IPSec tunnel is disabled

We have 3 IPSec tunnel set up between the cisco 1760 router and PIX 515e. IPSec tunnel is down by intermittent & son come only after compensation isakmp crypto & clear crypto its next to the router.

do we need to configure something else in router and end of pix so that tunnels are still in Active state (QM_IDLE).

Looks like the PIX loses its connection and the router is unable to say that the PIX has dropped.

Try the isakmp keepalive on both devices configuration but also check network links extended features.

See you soon,.

Paul.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • How to disable a particular IPSec tunnel on Cisco router

    Hi guys,.

    Someone knows a way to termporarily disable an IPSec tunnel on a Cisco router provided individual:

    -No configuration changes

    -Without affecting the other IPSec tunnels running

    -GRE is not used, so there is no tunnel interface to close

    Or in any event nearest to you to meet the requirement above?

    Thank you

    Andrew

    Andrew,

    There is no way to 'turn off' the tunnel without changing the config.

    I think the easiest would be to get the card crypto for this particular tunnel and remove the peer or the ACL:

    for example:

    labmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    no counterpart set 10.0.0.1

    labmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    no correspondence address 100

    or you can remove the key isakmp for this tunnel, that would, for example:

    No cisco123 key crypto isakmp 10.0.0.1 address

    That would prevent the tunnel to come without affecting the other tunnels.

    I hope this helps.

    Raga

  • IPSec Tunnel permanent between two ASA

    Hello

    I configured a VPN IPSec tunnel between two ASA 5505 firewall. I want to assure you as the IPSec tunnel (this is why the security association) is permanent and do not drop due to the idle state.

    What should I do?

    Thanks for any help

    Yves

    Disables keepalive IKE processing, which is enabled by default.

    (config) #tunnel - 10.165.205.222 group ipsec-attributes

    KeepAlive (ipsec-tunnel-config) #isakmp disable

    Set a maximum time for VPN connections with the command of vpn-session-timeout in group policy configuration mode or username configuration mode:

    attributes of hostname (config) #-Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
    hostname (Group Policy-config) #vpn - idle - timeout no

    attributes of hostname (config) #-Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
    hostname (Group Policy-config) #vpn - session - timeout no

    Thank you

    Ajay

  • DROP in flow of the IPSec tunnel

    Hello

    I am trying to use a VPN, who worked on one connection ASA months on ASA9.1 (2). I've updated to ASA9.1 11 (6) and it has stopped working.

    This is the remote ASA5505s making an IPSEC connection-a network head 5520. I can ride preceding and following 2 and 11 9.1 9.1 (6) and while the configuration does not change, the VPN starts working on 9.1 2

    Vpn connects, but there is no packets sent or received...

    I get this packet tracer...

    Output of the command: "packet - trace entry tcp teeessyou 192.168.190.2 5000 192.168.195.1 detail 80.

    Phase: 1
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Implicit rule
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xae1308e8, priority = 1, domain = allowed, deny = false
    hits = 622, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, l3_type = 0 x 8
    Mac SRC = 0000.0000.0000, mask is 0000.0000.0000
    DST = 0000.0000.0000 Mac, mask is 0100.0000.0000
    input_ifc = teeessyou, output_ifc = any

    Phase: 2
    Type: UN - NAT
    Subtype: static
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    NAT (teeessyou, outside) static source all all static destination teeessyou_ENCODERS teeessyou_ENCODERS
    Additional information:
    NAT divert on exit to the outside interface
    Untranslate 192.168.195.1/80 to 192.168.195.1/80

    Phase: 3
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype: Journal
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Access-group teeessyou_access_in in the teeessyou interface
    teeessyou_access_in of access allowed any ip an extended list
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xae24d310, priority = 13, area = allowed, deny = false
    hits = 622, user_data is 0xab6b23c0, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = teeessyou, output_ifc = any

    Phase: 4
    Type: NAT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    NAT (teeessyou, outside) static source all all static destination teeessyou_ENCODERS teeessyou_ENCODERS
    Additional information:
    Definition of static 192.168.190.2/5000 to 192.168.190.2/5000
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xae1ea5a8, priority = 6, area = nat, deny = false
    hits = 622, user_data is 0xae1e9c58, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=192.168.192.0 DST, mask is 255.255.224.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = teeessyou, output_ifc = external

    Phase: 5
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: volatile
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xa9678858, priority = 1, domain = nat-volatile, deny = true
    hits = 105, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0, Protocol = 6
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = none, output_ifc = any

    Phase: 6
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xae136910, priority = 0, sector = inspect-ip-options, deny = true
    hits = 622, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = teeessyou, output_ifc = any

    Phase: 7
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: encrypt
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xaeec4328, priority = 70, domain = encrypt, deny = false
    hits = 65, user_data is 0xb7dc, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=192.168.195.0 DST, mask is 255.255.255.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = none, output_ifc = external

    Phase: 8
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: rpf check
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    NAT (teeessyou, outside) static source all all static destination teeessyou_ENCODERS teeessyou_ENCODERS
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xae1eae48, priority = 6, area = nat-reversed, deny = false
    hits = 129, user_data is 0xae1e9d10, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=192.168.192.0 DST, mask is 255.255.224.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = teeessyou, output_ifc = external

    Phase: 9
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
    Result: DECLINE
    Config:
    Additional information:
    Reverse flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0xaea9f6b0, priority = 69 = ipsec-tunnel-flow area, deny = false
    hits = 129, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0xaea999c0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=192.168.192.0 SRC, mask = 255.255.224.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=192.168.190.0 DST, mask is 255.255.255.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = out, output_ifc = any

    Hello Spencerallsop,

    I recommend to add the keyword "no-proxy-arp" the end of the NAT statement, so the ASA try to answer queries ARP for the traffic(VPN interesting traffic), also this last phase 9 usually shows ignored due to a filter VPN defined in sometimes group policy, make sure you have not a filter VPN in a group policy that affect this tunnel then you will need to do the following:

    1. remove the NAT statement:

    -no nat (teeessyou, outside) static source all all static destination teeessyou_ENCODERS teeessyou_ENCODERS

    2 fix the NAT statement with the keyword "No.-proxy-arp" :

    -nat (teeessyou, outside) static source any any destination static teeessyou_ENCODERS teeessyou_ENCODERS non-proxy-arp

    3 disable the VPN ISA SA:

    -claire crypto ikev1 his

    4. run the packet tracer to check that the L2L has developed,

    To be honest I wouldn't recommend move you to 9.1.7 since it has some problems with the ARP entries, and it affects AnyConnect SSL somehow, which is still under investigation.

    In fact, this bug affects 9.1.7 (may affect your environment):

    - https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy28710

    Please don't forget to rate and score as of this post, keep me posted!

    Kind regards

    David Castro,

  • ASA: VPN IPSEC Tunnel from 5505(ver=8.47) to 5512 (ver = 9.23)

    Hi-

    We have connected tunnel / VPN configuration between an ASA 5505 - worm = 8.4 (7) and 5512 - worm = 9.2 (3).
    We can only ping in a sense - 5505 to the 5512, but not of vice-versa(5512 to 5505).

    Networks:

    Local: 192.168.1.0 (answering machine)
    Distance: 192.168.54.0 (initiator)

    See details below on our config:

    SH run card cry

    card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap_ibfw
    card crypto outside_map 2 pfs set group5
    outside_map 2 peer XX crypto card game. XX.XXX.XXX
    card crypto outside_map 2 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ikev1
    crypto map outside_map 2 set ikev2 AES256 ipsec-proposal

    outside_map interface card crypto outside

    Note:
    Getting to hit numbers below on rules/ACL...

    SH-access list. I have 54.0

    permit for access list 6 outside_access_out line scope ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 15931) 0x01aecbcc
    permit for access list 1 outside_cryptomap_ibfw line extended ip object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671
    access-list 1 permit line outside_cryptomap_ibfw extended ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671

    SH run | I have access-group
    Access-group outside_access_out outside interface

    NOTE:
    WE have another working on the 5512 - VPN tunnel we use IKE peer #2 below (in BOLD)...

    HS cry his ikev1

    IKEv1 SAs:

    HIS active: 2
    Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
    Total SA IKE: 2

    1 peer IKE: XX. XX.XXX.XXX
    Type: L2L role: answering machine
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE
    2 IKE peers: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
    Type: L2L role: answering machine
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

    SH run tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX
    tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX General-attributes
    Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
    tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX ipsec-attributes
    IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
    remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.

    SH run | I have political ikev1

    ikev1 160 crypto policy
    preshared authentication
    aes-256 encryption
    Group 5
    life 86400

    SH run | I Dynamics
    NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
    NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

    NOTE:
    To from 5512 at 5505-, we can ping a host on the remote network of ASA local

    # ping inside the 192.168.54.20
    Type to abort escape sequence.
    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.54.20, wait time is 2 seconds:
    !!!!!
    Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 ms

    Determination of 192.168.1.79 - local host route to 192.168.54.20 - remote host - derivation tunnel?

    The IPSEC tunnel check - seems OK?

    SH crypto ipsec his
    Interface: outside
    Tag crypto map: outside_map, seq num: 2, local addr: XX.XXX.XXX.XXX

    outside_cryptomap_ibfw to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer: XX. XX.XXX.XXX

    #pkts program: 4609, #pkts encrypt: 4609, #pkts digest: 4609
    #pkts decaps: 3851, #pkts decrypt: 3851, #pkts check: 3851
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 4609, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
    success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
    Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
    #TFC rcvd: 0, #TFC sent: 0
    #Valid errors ICMP rcvd: 0, #Invalid ICMP errors received: 0
    #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

    local crypto endpt. : XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/0, remote Start crypto. : XX. XX.XXX.XXX/0
    Path mtu 1500, ipsec 74 (44) generals, media, mtu 1500
    PMTU time remaining: 0, political of DF: copy / df
    Validation of ICMP error: disabled, TFC packets: disabled
    current outbound SPI: CDC99C9F
    current inbound SPI: 06821CBB

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0x06821CBB (109190331)
    transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914789/25743)
    Size IV: 16 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0xFFFFFFFF to 0xFFFFFFFF
    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0xCDC99C9F (3452542111)
    transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3913553/25743)
    Size IV: 16 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0x00000000 0x00000001

    --> The local ASA 5512 - where we have questions - tried Packet Tracer... seems we receive requests/responses...

    SH cap CAP

    34 packets captured

    1: 16:41:08.120477 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo request
    2: 16:41:08.278138 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
    3: 16:41:08.278427 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
    4: 16:41:09.291992 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
    5: 16:41:09.292282 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply

    --> On the ASA 5505 distance - we can ping through the 5512 to the local host (192.168.1.79)

    SH cap A2

    42 packets captured

    1: 16:56:16.136559 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
    2: 16:56:16.168860 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
    3: 16:56:17.140434 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
    4: 16:56:17.171652 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
    5: 16:56:18.154426 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
    6: 16:56:18.186178 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
    7: 16:56:19.168417 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request

    --> Package trace on 5512 does no problem... but we cannot ping from host to host?

    entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.1.79 8 0 detailed 192.168.54.20

    Phase: 4
    Type: CONN-SETTINGS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    class-map default class
    match any
    Policy-map global_policy
    class class by default
    Decrement-ttl connection set
    global service-policy global_policy
    Additional information:
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0x7fffa2d0ba90, priority = 7, area = conn-set, deny = false
    hits = 4417526, user_data = 0x7fffa2d09040, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = output_ifc = any to inside,

    Phase: 5
    Type: NAT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
    Additional information:
    Definition of dynamic 192.168.1.79/0 to XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/43904
    Direct flow from returns search rule:
    ID = 0x7fffa222d130, priority = 6, area = nat, deny = false
    hits = 4341877, user_data = 0x7fffa222b970, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
    IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
    input_ifc = inside, outside = output_ifc

    ...

    Phase: 14
    Type: CREATING STREAMS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    New workflow created with the 7422689 id, package sent to the next module
    Information module for forward flow...
    snp_fp_tracer_drop
    snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
    snp_fp_inspect_icmp
    snp_fp_translate
    snp_fp_adjacency
    snp_fp_fragment
    snp_ifc_stat

    Information for reverse flow...
    snp_fp_tracer_drop
    snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
    snp_fp_translate
    snp_fp_inspect_icmp
    snp_fp_adjacency
    snp_fp_fragment
    snp_ifc_stat

    Result:
    input interface: inside
    entry status: to the top
    entry-line-status: to the top
    output interface: outside
    the status of the output: to the top
    output-line-status: to the top
    Action: allow

    --> On remote ASA 5505 - Packet track is good and we can ping remote host very well... dunno why he "of Nations United-NAT?

    Destination - initiator:
     
    entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.54.20 8 0 detailed 192.168.1.79
     
    ...
    Phase: 4
    Type: UN - NAT
    Subtype: static
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    NAT (inside, outside) static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
    Additional information:
    NAT divert on exit to the outside interface
    Untranslate 192.168.1.79/0 to 192.168.1.79/0
    ...

    Summary:
    We "don't" ping from a host (192,168.1.79) on 5512 - within the network of the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20).
    But we can ping the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20) 5512 - inside the network host (192.168.1.79).

    Please let us know what other details we can provide to help solve, thanks for any help in advance.

    -SP

    Well, I think it is a NAT ordering the issue.

    Basically as static and this NAT rule-

    NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)

    are both in article 1 and in this article, it is done on the order of the rules so it does match the dynamic NAT rule rather than static because that seems to be higher in the order.

    To check just run a 'sh nat"and this will show you what order everthing is in.

    The ASA is working its way through the sections.

    You also have this-

    NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

    which does the same thing as first statement but is in section 3, it is never used.

    If you do one of two things-

    (1) configure the static NAT statement is above the dynamic NAT in section 1 that is to say. You can specify the command line

    or

    (2) remove the dynamic NAT of section 1 and then your ASA will use the entry in section 3.

    There is a very good document on this site for NAT and it is recommended to use section 3 for your general purpose NAT dynamic due precisely these questions.

    It is interesting on your ASA 5505 you duplicated your instructions of dynamic NAT again but this time with article 2 and the instructions in section 3 that is why your static NAT works because he's put in correspondence before all your dynamic rules.

    The only thing I'm not sure of is you remove the dynamic NAT statement in article 1 and rely on the statement in section 3, if she tears the current connections (sorry can't remember).

    Then you can simply try to rearrange so your static NAT is above it just to see if it works.

    Just in case you want to see the document here is the link-

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/132066/ASA-NAT-83-NAT-operation-and-configuration-format-CLI

    Jon

  • IPSec Tunnel upward, but not accessible from local networks

    Hello

    I have an ASA5520 and a Snapgear. The IPSec tunnel is in place and works very well. But I am not able to access the local LAN on both sides. Here are a few setups:

    SH crypt isakmp his

    Active SA: 1
    Rekey SA: 0 (A tunnel will report 1 Active and 1 Rekey SA during rekey)
    Total IKE SA: 1

    1   IKE Peer: 10.10.10.2
    Type    : L2L             Role    : responder
    Rekey   : no              State   : AM_ACTIVE

    Crypto/isakmp:

    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
    crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
    crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs group1
    crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-3DES-MD5 ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5
    crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
    crypto map outside_map interface outside
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 1 match address IPSECTEST_cryptomap
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 1 set peer 10.10.10.2
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 1 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 1 set nat-t-disable
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 1 set phase1-mode aggressive
    crypto map IPSECTEST_map0 interface IPSECTEST
    crypto isakmp enable outside
    crypto isakmp enable IPSECTEST
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    authentication pre-share
    encryption 3des
    hash sha
    group 2
    lifetime 3600

    Route SH:

    C    172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, VLAN10
    C    10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, IPSECTEST
    C    192.168.112.0 255.255.254.0 is directly connected, inside

    access-list:

    IPSECTEST_cryptomap list extended access allowed object-group DM_INLINE_PROTOCOL_1 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 object 172.20.20.0

    and here's the scenario:

    If I make a ping of the asa to the Remote LAN, I got this:

    ciscoasa (config) # ping 172.20.20.1
    Type to abort escape sequence.
    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 10.172.20.20.1, wait time is 2 seconds:
    No route to the host 172.20.20.1

    Success rate is 0% (0/1)

    No idea what I lack?

    Here's how to set up NAT ASA 8.3 exemption:

    network object obj - 172.16.3.0
    172.16.3.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    network object obj - 172.20.20.0
    172.20.20.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside, outside) source static obj - 172.16.3.0 obj - 172.16.3.0 destination static obj - 172.20.20.0 obj - 172.20.20.0

    Here's how it looks to the ASA 8.2 and below:

    Inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 172.16.3.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0
    NAT (inside) 0-list of access Inside_nat0_outbound

  • Cisco 1841 ipsec tunnel protocol down after a minute

    I have a strange problem where im manages to get a tha cisco ipsec tunnel 1841 to a RV016 linksys/cisco for about a minute and ping/encrypt the packets through the linen for about a minute before it breaks down. I tried different configuration and it all results in the tunnel for a minute then descend to come. I don't know if im hitting a bug and decide to if im doing something wrong.

    any help is appreciated paul

    RV016 firmware 2.0.18

    Cisco 1841: C1841-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4 (24) T

    my config

    no default isakmp crypto policy

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    BA 3des

    md5 hash

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    lifetime 28800

    ISAKMP crypto key address 0.0.0.0 eaton1234 0.0.0.0

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ESSTS

    transport mode

    no default crypto ipsec transform-set

    !

    Crypto ipsec profile ipsec_profile1

    Description in the location main site to site VPN tunnel

    game of transformation-ESSTS

    PFS group2 Set

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    Tunnel1 interface

    Description of the location of the hand

    IP unnumbered Serial0/0/0

    source of tunnel Serial0/0/0

    destination 209.213.x.x tunnel

    ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

    tunnel path-mtu-discovery

    protection of ipsec profile ipsec_profile1 tunnel

    !

    a debug output

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 the proposal

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

    (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 209.213.xx.46, distance = 209.213.xx.164,.

    local_proxy = 10.20.86.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    remote_proxy = 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    Protocol = ESP, transform = NONE (Tunnel),

    lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

    SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 0

    Apr 24 16:42:07: mapdb Crypto: proxy_match

    ADR SRC: 10.20.86.0

    ADR DST: 10.0.0.0

    Protocol: 0

    SRC port: 0

    DST port: 0

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)

    Apr 24 16:42:07: mapdb Crypto: proxy_match

    ADR SRC: 10.20.86.0

    ADR DST: 10.0.0.0

    Protocol: 0

    SRC port: 0

    DST port: 0

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (policy_db_add_ident): src dest 10.0.0.0, 10.20.86.0, dest_port

    0

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (create_sa): its created.

    (his) sa_dest = 209.213.xx.46, sa_proto = 50,.

    sa_spi = 0x4CF51011 (1291128849).

    sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 2045

    sa_lifetime(k/sec) = (4463729/3600)

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (create_sa): its created.

    (his) sa_dest = 209.213.xx.164, sa_proto = 50,.

    sa_spi = 0x1EB77DAF (515341743).

    sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 2046

    sa_lifetime(k/sec) = (4463729/3600)

    Apr 24 16:42:07: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel1, sta changed

    you to

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (key_engine_enable_outbound): rec would notify of ISAKMP

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (key_engine_enable_outbound): select SA with spinnaker 515341743/50

    Apr 24 16:42:07: IPSEC (update_current_outbound_sa): update peer 209.213.xx.164 curre

    NT his outgoing to SPI 1EB77DAF

    Apr 24 16:42:12: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 1,.

    local (identity) = 209.213.xx.46, distance = 209.213.xx.164,

    local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    remote_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4)

    Apr 24 16:42:12: IPSEC (sa_request):,.

    (Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = 209.213.xx.46, distance = 209.213.xx.164,.

    local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    remote_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    Protocol = ESP, transform = esp-3des esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),

    lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,

    SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 0

    Apr 24 16:42:42: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 2,.

    local (identity) = 209.213.xx.46, distance = 209.213.xx.164,

    local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    remote_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4)

    Apr 24 16:42:42: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel1, sta changed

    you all the downu

    All possible debugging has been disabled

    I would try to set up a VPN Interface virtual Tunnel on the IOS router base and the value of defined transformation in tunnel mode no transport.

    In history, I have had several issues with VPN between a router IOS and the series RV.

  • Traffic is failed on plain IPSec tunnel between two 892 s

    Have a weird case and you are looking for some suggestions/thougs where to dig because I have exhausted the options.

    Note: I replaced the Networkid real to a mentined below.

    Topology: a classic IPSec VPN tunnel between two 892 s of Cisco, with pre-shared key and no GRE. A 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet using PPPoE and has three network / VLAN behind it. A VLAN is coordinated to the PPPoE internet access. Access to the other two VLAN - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) is performed via the VPN tunnel.

    Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and a static route to the default GW. It doesn't have any defined interal network. If the router is strictly used to send traffic to VL92/VL93 to the domestic 892 via IPSec tunnel.

    Here's the problem: access to VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not work.

    Devices in VL92 I ping IP address of 892_DC through the VPN tunnel. The 892_DC router I can ping devices in VL92. However, I can't VL92 ping any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time the packets arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent through the VPN tunnel.

    I took the package trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to nathalie caron to VL92 packages and saw that the traffic coming to the 892_DC. I run the nathalie caron even on Branch_892, and there was not a single package.

    So... What's the problem? More interesting, I modified the way left on VL92 access list and still - no packets are sent through the tunnel.

    Any idea? Two routers config are below

    -------

    892_DC #show ru

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    hash sha256

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    isakmp encryption key * address 1.2.3.4

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

    !

    address of 1.2.3.4 crypto isakmp peers

    Description of-COIL-892

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

    Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

    !

    map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

    defined peer 1.2.3.4

    disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

    86400 seconds, life of security association set

    the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

    match a lists 101

    market arriere-route

    QoS before filing

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0

    IP 10,20,30,40 255.255.255.240

    IP 1400 MTU

    IP tcp adjust-mss 1360

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

    !

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.41

    !

    access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Branch_892 #sh run

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    hash sha256

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    isakmp encryption key * address 10,20,30,40

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

    !

    address peer isakmp crypto 10,20,30,40

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

    Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

    !

    map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

    defined peer 10,20,30,40

    disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

    86400 seconds, life of security association set

    the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

    match address 101

    market arriere-route

    QoS before filing

    !

    FastEthernet6 interface

    Description VL92

    switchport access vlan 92

    !

    interface FastEthernet7

    Description VL93

    switchport access vlan 93

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0

    Description # to WAN #.

    no ip address

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1

    !

    interface Vlan1

    Description # local to #.

    IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0

    IP nat inside

    IP virtual-reassembly in

    !

    interface Vlan92

    Description fa6-nexus e100/0/40

    IP 100.100.200.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Vlan93

    Description fa7-nexus e100/0/38

    IP 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Dialer0

    no ip address

    No cdp enable

    !

    interface Dialer1

    IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.248

    IP mtu 1454

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly in max-pumping 256

    encapsulation ppp

    IP tcp adjust-mss 1414

    Dialer pool 1

    Dialer-Group 1

    Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol

    PPP chap hostname ~ ~ ~

    PPP chap password =.

    No cdp enable

    card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

    !

    Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

    !

    access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 any

    access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 any

    !

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1

    Yes correct sounds - so another possible problem is the routing is routing 100% correct on both sides? Can you put the two sides config for review?

  • IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200

    Someone has set up an IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200? I can't get the right configuration.

    Agitation, these products are treated by the Cisco Small Business support community. Please refer to the URL: https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business

  • IPSec Tunnel between Cisco 2801 and Netscren 50 with NAT and static

    Hello

    My problem isn't really the IPSec connection between two devices (it is already done...) But my problem is that I have a mail server on the site of Cisco, who have a static NAT from inside to outside. Due to the static NAT, I do not see the server in the VPN tunnel. I found a document that almost describes the problem:

    "Configuration of a router IPSEC Tunnel private-to-private network with NAT and static" (Document ID 14144)

    NAT takes place before the encryption verification!

    In this document, the solution is 'routing policy' using the loopback interface. But, how can I handle this with the Netscreen firewall. Someone has an idea?

    Thanks for any help

    Best regards

    Heiko

    Hello

    Try to change your static NAT with static NAT based policy.

    That is to say the static NAT should not be applicable for VPN traffic

    permissible static route map 1

    corresponds to the IP 104

    access-list 104 refuse host ip 10.1.110.10 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

    access-list 104 allow the host ip 10.1.110.10 all

    IP nat inside source static 10.1.110.10 81.222.33.90 map of static route

    HTH

    Kind regards

    GE.

  • IPSEC tunnels does not connect

    Out of sudden IPSEC tunnel on remote site 202.68.211.20 is not plug in. Previously is OK. There is no change in config.

    IKE Phase 1 even not connect.

    I'm debugging, but I don't know what could be the error.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = PuTTY connect 2016.05.12 15:19:36 = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ = ~ =.
    12 May 12:06:50 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:06:50 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:06:53 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:06:53 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:06:54 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, case of mistaken IKE MM Initiator WSF (struct & 0xd84aff40) , : MM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_RETRY--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_TIMEOUT--> MM_WAIT_MSG2 NullEvent--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_SND_MSG--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_START_TMR--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_RESEND_MSG--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_RETRY
    12 May 12:06:54 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE SA MM:914f04ce ending: flags 0 x 01000022, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
    12 May 12:06:54 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, sending clear/delete with the message of reason
    12 May 12:06:59 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:06:59 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, initiator of IKE: New Phase 1, Intf internal, IKE Peer 202.68.211.20 address proxy local 10.215.20.0 address remote Proxy 10.210.0.0, Card Crypto (VPN_map)
    12 May 12:06:59 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, build the payloads of ISAKMP security
    12 May 12:06:59 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, construction of Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality
    12 May 12:06:59 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:07 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:07:03 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:07:03 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:07:07 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE new SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:07:09 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:07:15 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE new SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07:23 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE new SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07:31 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, case of mistaken IKE MM Initiator WSF (struct & 0xd8457958) , : MM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_RETRY--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_TIMEOUT--> MM_WAIT_MSG2 NullEvent--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_SND_MSG--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_START_TMR--> MM_SND_MSG1, EV_RESEND_MSG--> MM_WAIT_MSG2, EV_RETRY
    12 May 12:07:31 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE SA MM:be63ea64 ending: flags 0 x 01000022, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
    12 May 12:07:31 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, sending clear/delete with the message of reason
    12 May 12:07:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:07:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, initiator of IKE: New Phase 1, Intf internal, IKE Peer 202.68.211.20 address proxy local 10.215.20.0 address remote Proxy 10.210.0.0, Card Crypto (VPN_map)
    12 May 12:07:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, build the payloads of ISAKMP security
    12 May 12:07:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 202.68.211.20, construction of Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality
    12 May 12:07:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07:40 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0

    12 May 12:07:40 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:07:45 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE new SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    12 May 12:07:46 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0
    12 May 12:07:46 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.
    12 May 12:07:53 [IKEv1]: IP = 202.68.211.20, IKE_DECODE new SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 112
    q

    Hello

    It seems that the tunnel is blocked to MSG_2.

    You can check if the UDP 500 traffic is not blocked between peers?

    Please check with your provider.

    Kind regards

    Aditya

    Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

  • How to troubleshoot an IPSec tunnel GRE?

    Hello

    My topology includes two firewalls connected through the Internet "" (router) and behind each firewall, there is a router.

    The routers I configured a GRE tunnel that is successful, then I configured an IPsec tunnel on the firewall.

    I does not change the mode to transport mode in the transform-set configuration.

    Everything works; If I connect a PC to the router, it can ping another PC on the other router. However if I change mode of transport mode that they cannot.

    I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?

    Thank you.

    I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?

    To verify that the VPN tunnel works well, check the output of
    ISAKMP crypto to show his
    Crypto ipsec to show his

    Here are the commands of debug
    Debug condition crypto x.x.x.x, where x.x.x.x IP = peer peer
    Debug crypto isakmp 200
    Debug crypto ipsec 200

    You will see ACTIVE int the first output and program non-zero and decaps on the output of the latter.

    For the GRE tunnel.
    check the condition of the tunnel via "int ip see the brief.

    In addition, you can configure keepalive via the command:

    Router # configure terminal
    Router (config) #interface tunnel0
    Router(Config-if) 5 4 #keepalive

    and then run "debug keepalive tunnel" to see packets hello tunnel going and coming from the router.

    Kind regards
    Dinesh Moudgil

    PS Please rate helpful messages.

  • RV180 dhcp via IPSEC Tunnel

    Hello

    I have set up an ipsec tunnel between rv180 (site A) and asa5520 (site B) successful. The dhcp server to clients is on the B site. The dhcp clients request going through the tunnel, they leave the rv180 on the wan interface and arrive at site B with the wan-ipaddress from site A. The configured dhcp-relay on the website match the remote network (site B), configured in the on site A ipsec tunnel. Is there anyway that all traffic pass through the ipsec tunnel? We want it for security reasons.

    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Ralf

    Dear Ralf,

    Thank you to reach small business support community.

    Unfortunately the relay DHCP Relay not of DHCP request to the IPSec VPN tunnel.  I hope that this answer to your question and do not hesitate to contact me if there is any additional help with what I can help you.

    Kind regards

    Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
    Support Engineer Cisco client

    * Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • Outgoing PAT to the IPSec Tunnel

    Hello

    Situation is with range of IP private tunnel of 3rd party who already uses the same private beach, but not with any of the hosts that we need to connect to. All traffic from the office to the 3rd party must be secure.

    We want to configure an IPSec tunnel between the two sites (easy) and then use PAT on the PIX Office (6.3 (5)) to make all traffic office appear to be a single private address different.

    We tried to do with PDM, but it insists on having no NAT (with an exclusionary rule), or static NAT, but does not seem to allow Pat.

    I have attached a copy sanitized the office configuration. Any standard room in PIX have been removed for brevity

    I would like constructive guidance on where I'm wrong.

    See you soon

    Hello

    The PIX / ASA will make the NAT translation on the steps below. First, it will check if no no (order No. - nat) nat is configured, then it will check the static nat translation and finally, it will check the translation PAT.

    In your configuration, there is a NAT (0) command indicating not to translate any IP of 192.168.0.0 to the remote ip address range, then the PIX won't do the translation and the package is passed to the destination.

    Remove the NAT (0) command and edit list access outside_cryptomap_10 with the ip dried up to the remote ip address for this access list is responsible for interesting traffic that needs to be encrypted.

    pls control and dream of return.

  • Policy Nat and IPSec tunnel

    Hello

    I have a Cisco IOS router and you want to configure an IPSec tunnel between myself and the client.  Unfortunately, we have two overlapping of 10 network IP addresses.

    Is it possible for me to just Nat addresses IP on my side or should the customer Nat as well?

    I have configured NAT on the inside of the interface for 10.134.206.1 to 192.168.156.6 so that Nat happens before that packages are encrypted in the tunnel, however tunnel is not coming.    The client uses a sonic firewall and allowed their 10.91.0.0/16 network 192.168.156.0/24.

    See attachment

    Kind regards

    They are wrong to installation.  Remote local networks are not 10.134.206.0 and 10.134.206/42.  It is simply your public IP address.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot change the size of the text

    I tested a site and can get no response in FF mobile if I change the text size to the size of the text/display/settings. The text just stay the same size, regardless of whether I put small or very large. Site zooms 'text only' in FF Office and do so

  • HP Pavilion Elite GX610AA-A2L: HP product # does not match the version of Microsoft

    I tried to update the drivers etc, when I use the feature updates of research with my 'product name' he asks me so my OS.  The only option it gives me is "Microsoft Vista".  Well I have updated my OS to Win 7 a couple of years. -How can I check to se

  • Infrequent delays in executing DLL RTOS

    I've been profiling one program that I write that makes many DLL calls every 10 ms and runs for several minutes and I noticed a strange behavior. In the attached vi.png, you will see a very clean low VI it is enough to illustrate my question. Basical

  • Duration of data acquisition

    I did a USB9239 control program, then I have compiled in exe. I installed engine (8.6.1) DURATION LV, but still seems insufficient. This means that I have to install the DAQmx run-time engine, it is big enough. Are there other things I need to instal

  • "Save as" box pop up does not allow me to save the document.

    Hello"Save as" box pop up does not allow me to save the document. Displays a white screen. No idea what would cause this? I bought acrobat pro dc.Thank you!