is eazy customer vpn is supported only on the routers of the 800 pix 7.0 series iOS

Similar Questions

• Error: Execution of registry is supported only on the FPGA target

  I am trying to write a debugging tool to test the communication between objects FP on my host VI to a RT system and then to a FPGA system.  I thought I would "simulate" the three layers with queues between them in order to ensure that the parameters are received correctly - a comprehensive test of Communications virtually.  I want to be able to run this VI on the host.  There are a lot of bits being shifted and twisted and be able to define probes and braekpoints within a single host VI is an advantage.

  Initially, it worked fine after copying my FPGA code (with object instantiation of the registers and then reading and writing for them), but now then LabVIEW did another thing that disappears (with no goodbye or anything like that).  When I say that it worked, the values read from the FPGA objects that instantiate their own records showed the correct values when sending data.  This means that LV really instantiate records and has been able to address them individually.

  Since then, I get the error appearing in the title, whenever I try to run the VI.

  (1) should I really move my parts FPGA to a VI on the FPGA target and have the VI in parallel with the defined target to run in Dev mode (and sends data over the DMA channel)

  (2) why this work initially and then fail?

  Shane

  False alarm, I had no wired all my objects instantiated (and thus a communication VI received default objects with no valid registry.

  Program actually works very well.

  Still weird, but the error message doesn't really leave everything that was wrong.

  Shane.

• Tunnel VPN Firewall (both sides of the Site B, same IP series)

  Hi Experts,

  I'm in a weird situation, hope I can get an answer from you guys.

  I had created VPN tunnel to our customer on our firewall 3 years.

  Now we create the VPN tunnel for new customer, but the IP settings to the new customer is the same as the former client. How can we get through this that we can not change the IP settings on both clients.

  Here are the technical details

  Older Client settings:

  (1) our authorized Local LAN IP: 192.168.3.0/24

  (2) customer Local LAN IP authorized: 10.0.0.0/8 (as several range of network to the client end)

  New customer to make settings:

  (1) our authorized Local LAN IP: 192.168.3.0/24

  (2) authorized customer Local LAN IP: 10.10.16.0/24

  10.10.32.0/24

  Please help as well how we can make the settings without making any changes on the client side.

  I am using firewall Watchguard XTM 515

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Mandeep

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• a way vpn with asa to the 800 router

  people

  I have a site to site vpn set up between a asa 5540 and a 800 router

  I want only the vpn to be initiated from the asa with the 800 remote listen incoming connections

  I know that I can define the type of connection on the asa as only come but I can find an equivalent command to answer only for the 800 remote

  can anyone point me in the right direction or is it enough to simply configure the asa as are created only for this encryption card

  Thanks to anyone who takes the time to answer

  Hello

  I recommend you configure the tunnel as a dynamic to static tunnel VPN, the ASA will be the static counterpart, so it will be the initiator and the router will never be able to establish the connection.

  The ASA will be a common L2L configuration, but the router will use a dynamic encryption card.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008051a69a.shtml

  The PIX in the example is old, then you can simply adjust the controls to your current version, the important thing is to understand the concept.

  Please let me know if that answers your question,

  Thank you.

• Cisco VPN only supports only 32-bit

  Hi all, I have 64-bit ram (2 GB) and windows 7 installed on... but my Cisco VPN supports only 32-bit only... my query is can I buy an another 32-bit (2 GB) and insert it in another location... .will it compatible?  enjoyed your answers... Thanks maou

  No, that succeed not compatible, you could dual boot with Windows 7 32 bit and you'd be able to use the CISCO VPN, you must purchase an additional license for the edition of Windows 7, you are running.

  Please see the following article with useful information about dual-boot:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/can-I-have-more-than-one-operating-system-on-my-computer-multiboot

  Buy an additional license:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/buy/default.aspx

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/get-a-new-Windows-product-key

  or

  You can upgrade to Windows 7 Professional or ultimate edition if you run or another edition and download free Windows XP Mode and use it there:

  Run in Windows XP Mode requires:

  (1) Windows 7 Professional, Ultimate or Enterprise (not supported in Home Premium).

  Windows XP Mode and Windows Virtual PC

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/Virtual-PC/default.aspx

  Windows XP Mode now accessible to more than PC

  http://windowsteamblog.com/Windows/archive/b/Windows7/archive/2010/03/18/Windows-XP-mode-now-accessible-to-more-PCs.aspx

  Get started with Windows Virtual PC

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/Virtual-PC/get-started.aspx

  http://www.notebooks.com/2009/11/23/using-Windows-Virtual-PC-with-Windows-XP-mode/

  Windows 7 - upgrade Express features:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/Windows-Anytime-Upgrade

• Routing quirks SSL customer VPN - more

  I studied SSL VPN-Plus feature on NSX Edge Gateway and I noticed something really weird just how customer VPN traffic is routed. All client TCP connections are NAT'd to closest edge interface address, any other protocol is routed by using the IP address of the affected client Pool of IP.

  Example of

  Bridge Board with two interfaces

  -outdoor = x.x.x.x

  inside-a = y.y.y.y

  VPN client

  -IP address = z.z.z.z

  
  Ping ICMP customer VNP with IP address z.z.z.z arrives at its destination with IP address z.z.z.z

  UDP DNS queries to customer VNP with IP address z.z.z.z arrives at its destination with IP address z.z.z.z

  Application of TCP HTTPS client VPN with IP address z.z.z.z arrives at its destination with the IP edge gateway interface address y.y.y.y

  I have no NAT configuration defined by the user in place, only NAT rule is rule DNAT system default for the external interface (uplink).

  That's serious problem with SSL VPN-Plus, I filed a request for support if could, but since I am a student help on licenses NFR partner without support I can't.

  Ed. also tested the UDP

  There is a flag in configuration edge-> sslvpn-> private networks-> specific entry-> 'enable TCP optimization '.

  Disable that and you will see even the client ip TCP connections.

  Dimitri

• Is it still possible? Customer VPN traffic through a PIX for an another VPN?

  Hi, I just want to know if the following is actually technically possible? I'm starting to think I'm trying to implement a solution that is simply not possible.

  I have the following:

  VPN<->CiscoPix506e<->Cisco3000 Clients

  VPN clients running an IPSEC VPN for the 506th Cisco PIX and can access its "internal network" very well.

  The Cisco pix is running a VPN to another company where all network traffic is nat'ed to a single address IP RFC1918 before coming out of the tunnel (requirement of the other company to avoid the problems of overlap)

  and everyone on the "internal network" can access this great VPN.

  I want that people who use the VPN client to be able to access the other site-to-site VPN. I think that NAT forced to the external company VPN is a problem.

  All of the examples for VPN VPN cross-I see specify NAT should be disabled on the entire path. I can't do it in this situation. Is it possible to make this work?

  I guess with a good statement of ACL that all my problems will be solved.

  If you just get the users connect to the cisco 3000 rather than transversing my network. I don't have for the following reasons. I have no access to the cisco 3000 vpn concentrator and a very limited amount of the tunnels that they can open for my business. I was instructed to implement a solution to facilitate the life of employees (so that they only run a VPN tunnel at a time to do their work). For the moment, they need access to the systems within our corporate network and external society through the site to site VPN (it's actually a web application). They can do this at the office but obviously not home if they attempt to use remote access.

  I have attached a diagram of the network example PDF explaining the situation.

  Networks of each address is the following (change of the actual address of the innocents :))):

  CLIENTS_VPN

  192.168.10.0/24

  Internal network

  192.168.1.0/24

  External VPN end point

  192.168.20.0/24

  Address used for NAT on the VPN

  172.16.1.1/32

  the IOS config

  local IP pool - 192.168.10.1 VPN CLIENTS - 192.168.10.254

  inside ip access list allow a whole

  access-list allowed SHEEP ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  access list permits EXTERNAL-ACL-VPN ip 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  EXTERNAL-ACL-NAT of the list of permitted access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  IP address outside a.b.c.d 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  Global interface 2 (external)

  Global (outside) 1 172.16.1.1

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list SHEEP

  NAT (inside) - EXTERNAL-ACL-1 NAT access list 0 0

  NAT (inside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  outside access-group in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a.b.c.d 1

  Thank you

  Jason.

  I understand from your description of the scenario, you try to route traffic on the same interface on which it was received on the PIX. This is called pinning hair in traffic and is not currently supported in PIX (6.3).

• VPN Cisco ASA 5540 L2L - one-way traffic only for the pair to a network

  Hello

  I'm a little confused as to which is the problem. This is the premise for the problem I have face.

  One of our big clients has a Cisco ASA5540 (8.2 (2)) failover (active / standby). Early last year, we have configured a VPN from Lan to Lan to a 3rd party site (a device of control point on their end). He worked until early this week when suddenly the connection problems.

  Only 1 of the 3 networks the / guests can access a remote network on the other side. 2 others have suddenly stopped working. We do not know of any change on our side and the remote end also insists that their end configurations are correct (and what information they sent me it seems to be correct)

  So essentially the encryption field is configured as follows:

  access-list line 1 permit extended ip 10.238.57.21 host 10.82.0.202 (hitcnt = 2)
  access-list line 2 extended permit ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 198)
  access-list line 3 extended permit ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 173)

  Free NAT has been configured as follows (names modified interfaces):

  NAT (interface1) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP

  the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  permit for Access-list SHEEP-VPN-INSIDE line lengthened 2 ip host 10.238.57.21 10.82.0.202

  NAT (interface2) 0-list of access VPN-SHEEP

  VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252

  After the problem started only 10.207.0.0/16 network connections worked for the site remote 10.82.0.200/30. All other connections do not work.

  There has been no change made on our side and on the side remote also insists there has been no change. I also checked how long the ASAs have been upward and how long the same device has been active in the failover. Both have been at the same time (about a year)

  The main problem is that users of the 10.231.191.0/24 cant access remote network network. However, the remote user can initiate and implement the VPN on their side but usually get any return traffic. Ive also checked that the routes are configured correctly in the routers in core for the return of their connections traffic should go back to the firewall.

  Also used of "packet - trace" event raising the VPN tunnel (even if it passes the phases VPN). For my understanding "packet - trace" alone with the IP source and destination addresses must activate the VPN connection (even if it generates no traffic to the current tunnel).

  This is printing to the following command: "packet - trace entry interface1 tcp 10.231.191.100 1025 10.82.0.203 80.

  Phase: 1
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Implicit rule
  Additional information:
  MAC access list

  Phase: 2
  Type: FLOW-SEARCH
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

  Phase: 3
  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
  Subtype: entry
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  in 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 outside

  Phase: 4
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype: Journal
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Access-group interface interface1
  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Additional information:

  Phase: 5
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 6
  Type: INSPECT
  Subtype: np - inspect
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the http
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:

  Phase: 7
  Type: FOVER
  Subtype: Eve-updated
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 8
  Type: NAT-FREE
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Exempt from NAT
  translate_hits = 32, untranslate_hits = 35251
  Additional information:

  -Phase 9 is a static nat of the problem to another network interface. Don't know why his watch to print.

  Phase: 9
  Type: NAT
  Subtype: host-limits
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (interface1, interface3) 10.231.0.0 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 subnet mask
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 interface3 all
  static translation at 10.231.0.0
  translate_hits = 153954, untranslate_hits = 88
  Additional information:

  -Phase 10 seems to be the default NAT for the local network configuration when traffic is to the Internet

  Phase: 10
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (interface1) 5 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside of any
  dynamic translation of hen 5 (y.y.y.y)
  translate_hits = 3048900, untranslate_hits = 77195
  Additional information:

  Phase: 11
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: encrypt
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 12
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 13
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 1047981896 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:
  input interface: interface1
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  So, basically, the connection should properly go to connect VPN L2L but yet is not. I tried to generate customer traffic of base (with the source IP address of the client network and I see the connection on the firewall, but yet there is absolutely no encapsulated packets when I check "crypto ipsec to show his" regarding this connection VPN L2L.) Its almost as if the firewall only transfers the packets on the external interface instead of encapsulating for VPN?

  And as I said, at the same time the remote end can activate the connection between these 2 networks very well, but just won't get any traffic back to their echo ICMP messages.

  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.231.191.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.82.0.200/255.255.255.252/0/0)
  current_peer: y.y.y.y

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 131, #pkts decrypt: 131, #pkts check: 131
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  If it was just a routing problem it would be a simple thing to fix, but it is not because I can see the connection I have to confirm it by the router base on the firewall, but they don't just get passed on to the VPN connection.

  Could this happen due to a bug in the Software ASA? Would this be something with Checkpoint VPN device? (I have absolutely no experience with devices of control point)

  If there is any essential information that I can give, please ask.

  -Jouni

  Jouni,

  8.2.4.1 is the minimum - 8.2.4 had some issues (including TCP proxy).

  If this does not resolve the problem - I suggest open TAC box to get to the bottom of this ;-)

  Marcin

• My Lightroom update serial number 5 appearing only on the my products page. unnecessary support chat

  I bought a license of Lightroom 5 upgrade July 25.  I got a confirmation e-mail but my serial number is displayed on the order summary page after purchase.  I tried to register the serial number several times through the page of my products, but for a reason that was not appear serial number, even if the registration process present a successful result.  In addition, the Adobe products purchased in the Adobe store must be automatically registered according to the Adobe web site.  Apparently it must have failed.  I need to reinstall Lightroom 5 but the serial number still does not show up on top of the page my products.  I just spent an very frustrating of an hour with the cat 'Live' Adobe, who has done nothing but send me in circles and repeat the same canned answers over and over again.

  I am currently on hold with "hotline", but I am not optimistic because I've been waiting for 28 minutes.  The only other option support was a link on this forum, where this post.  I hope someone from Adobe can retrieve my serial number and contact me.  Otherwise, my only other option will be to contact VISA and open a support ticket.

  My comical-if-it-weren't-so-sad conversation with Adobe support:

  Hi, there are 36 customers online in front of you. We will be with you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.

  Hi, there are 35 client (s) online in front of you. We will be with you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.

  Hi, there are 31 client (s) online in front of you. We will be with you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.

  You are now talking to Bhagawan.

  Fanny: Hello! Welcome to the Adobe Customer Service.

  Joel: Hello

  Bhagawan: Hi Joel.

  Joel: I have to reinstall Lightroom 5 but my serial number is not displayed remotely in my products and Services on the Web site

  Joel: I bought a Lightroom 5 upgrade in July

  Fanny: I'll be happy to check and help you with this question.

  Joel: For some reason any registration of the product does not appear under my account. I have my VISA transaction info if it helps you to find my purchase.

  Joel: thank you

  Fanny: I'll be right with you.

  Joel: Okay

  Bhagawan: Okay.

  Bhagawan: Can I know the e-mail address, please?

  Joel: *.

  Fanny: thank you.

  Bhagawan: Let me check on that.

  Stephanie: For security reasons, could verify your full name and address of billing on your account please?

  Joel: ensure that:

  Joel: Joel *.

  Joel: *.

  Fanny: Thank you Joel.

  Joel: Joel, I see that your serial number is registered under your adobe account, please sign out and sign in your adobe account click on my products and service information to retrieve the serial number.

  Joel: I see that Lightroom 4... No Lightroom 5.

  Joel: But I'll try

  Joel: Give me a sec

  Bhagawan: sure.

  Joel: Nope... still shows that Lightroom 4

  Joel: Products in use Version registration platform when Lightroom 4 Mul October 4, 2012 to register new products

  Bhagawan: Okay.

  Joel: Don't know why it is not show my driver's license, upgraded to Lightroom 5

  Bhagawan: Please give me a minute or two.

  Joel: Okay

  Bhagawan: sure.

  Fanny: Thank you to stay online.

  Joel: np

  Joel: Joel, in this case, I put you this cat to our team in order to check and help you with the serial number.

  Joel: Okay

  Bhagawan: Please stay on the line.

  Joel: Okay

  Please wait while I transfer the chat to the appropriate group.

  You are now chatting with Naveen R.

  Native r: sorry for the wait. Please stay online.

  Native r: Hello! Welcome to the Adobe Customer Service.

  Joel: Okay

  Joel: Hello

  Native r: Hi Joel.

  Native r: I understand that you are unable to locate the serial number.

  Joel: I bought Lightroom 5 on July 25, 2013, as an upgrade for Lightroom 4. I need to reinstall Lightroom 5, but my serial number does not appear in the page products and services.

  Joel: I looked through my e-mail receipts and could not find an order confirmation (or whatever it is Adobe on my recent purchase.) After purchasing the upgrade, the serial number is displayed and I thought that I had recorded using Adobe account portal

  Joel: Apparently, it did not work. I have my VISA if necessary transaction information.

  Native r: thanks for the information.

  R: Naveen, I'll be happy to check and help you with that.

  Joel: thank you

  Joel: As I said to the agent, when I entered my products on the portal of Adobe, I can see my Lightroom 4 info, but the Lightroom 5 upgrade info is not there.

  Joel: a = go

  Joel: sry

  Native r: thank you for waiting. A moment please.

  Joel: Okay

  Naveen a: I'll be right with you.

  Native r: sorry for the wait. Please stay online.

  Joel: Okay

  Native r: thank you for waiting. A moment please.

  Native r: sorry for the wait. Please stay online.

  Joel: It will take a lot more time?

  R: Naveen let me check on that.

  Joel: Are you living?

  Native r: I'm sorry due to the error of the application that I'm unable to check on that.

  Joel: Can I please get a phone number to call? My only other choice would be to open a claim with VISA for fraud since Adobe seems unwilling to help in this matter

  Native r: I'll give you the steps to find the serial number on your Adobe account.

  Joel: I already know how to look for a serial number. The problem is that it does not appear in the Adobe account portal.

  A: Naveen please log in under another browser.

  Joel: Ever tried. Used IE then Chrome

  Native r: remove the cookies your browser update.

  Joel: Same problem

  Joel: Please provide me with a number to call

  Native r * one time that you sign in to the Adobe account, click on "My products" under the "my products and services.

  Naveen a: *, You can locate the serial number that you have saved.

  Joel: I already have.

  Joel: It is NOT listed

  Joel: which I said in the last 40 minutes +.

  R: Naveen can I know the address of e-mail that you connected to Adobe account?

  Joel: *.

  R: Naveen thanks.

  Joel:...

  Native r: thank you for waiting. A moment please.

  Native r: I see that your serial number is registered under your account.

  Joel: Lightroom 5

  Native r: I will give you the serial number by email after the end of that conversation.

  Joel: Okay, but please make sure that this isn't Lightroom 4 but my serial number Lightroom 5

  Native r: Yes. Due to a technical error, you are unable to locate him.

  Joel: ok please send serial number

  Naveen a: sure.

  A: Naveen is another thing I can help you?

  Joel: No.

  From left to right: you're welcome.

  Native r: please contact Adobe. We are available 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. Good bye!

  This chat session is over.
  Please contact Adobe.

  OK, I was able to recover my previous system image and fortunately it seems that you can get the serial number of the help-> System Info.  I tried to save the serial number again through my products page and while he said that the registration was successful, we'll see.  At least I should be able to install LR5 on my new machine now.

  Edit:  I also just found out that the serial number is listed under my orders, but not under my products.  Weird.  In my defense, I never thought to check the history of my order because I never received a confirmation email and the order has not been listed after purchase even as late as mid-August (when I checked last.)  Very strange but it's all good now.

  Edit #2: OK now I feel stupid.  I just got an email from Naveen with a real support AND if the correct serial number.  So, I was wrong.  Live Chat process still feel incredibly long with a few responses apparently canned / automated, but, in fairness, he did get back to me.  Thank God I washed my feet today...

• HRSSA Custom WF runs only when the required approval?

  We have problems with a custom function in the learning management. The URL refers to new features and workflows and seems to be correctly formatted (for us). All of our other HRSSA custom workflow triggers correctly when it is called.
  
  If the operation requires approval, the custom workflow is executed.
  
  If the operation does not require the approval, he returned to the seeded Workflow process, even if the URL indicates what he calls our custom features and workflows.
  
  We will copy / modify OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS and OTA_LEARNER_HOME_PARMS and we have replaced all references to the seeded functions and processes so that they point to those custom in the two parameters and the call of HTML. Our custom workflow is registered under the conditions of the SOUL for Oracle Self Service human resources and personalized features are stored in the custom Global Self Service menu.
  
  OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS
  
  OA.jsp? OAFunc = XX_OTA_LEARNER_HOME_PARMS & OAHP = XX_OTA_LEARNER_APP_MENU & OASF = XX_OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS & OAPB = OTA_PRODUCT_BRANDING & pFyiNtfDetails = N
  
  pAMETranType = OTA & pAMEAppId = 810 & pProcessName = XX_LNR_TRNG_APV & pCalledFrom = XX_OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS & pItemType = HRSSA & pFromMenu = Y & pApprovalMode = YD & pCertProcessName = XX_OTA_CERT_APPRV_JSP_PRC & pCertApprovalMode = YD
  
  OTA_LEARNER_HOME_PARMS
  
  OA.jsp?page=/oracle/apps/ota/learner/webui/LearnerHomePG & pAMETranType = OTA & pAMEAppId = 810 & pProcessName = XX_OTA_LNR_TRNG_APV & pCalledFrom = XX_OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS & pItemType = HRSSA & pFromMenu = Y & pApprovalMode = YD & OAFunc = XX_OTA_LEARNER_HOME_SS
  
  Looking at the details of workflow in State control, the following settings are missing for one who does not need approval (and ran the seeded workflow):
  
  Transaction ID
  ICX Session ID
  ID function
  
  We are on 12.1.3. We've seen a few similar posts, but nothing to exactly in this direction. Someone else met this kind of behavior?
  
  We have combed by OTN messages, Apps2Fusion, Anil Passi former site, the leading Workflow Solution book (which is very good btw) and google our little hearts.
  
  Thank you very much. Of course, we could use some ideas on this one!
  John
  
  (Inadvertently, we posted this question in another thread, before you know it, it was several years, so we're starting a new).

  The problem is that some function calls to OLM are hard coded.

  Here is the solution that we chose to go with:
  S ' ensure that seeded functions are included with all custom in learning functions current menu functions
  -Replace the call to "OTA_LNR_TRNG_APPROVAL_JSP_PRC" in the inscription seeded in learning and registration in Params learning functions to refer to our custom workflow process

  It is not a supported configuration, because we change something from seeds, but it's the only way we found to call our customized registration process requires no approval.

• Hi, I read your support page that the News widget is available only in the United States, the United Kingdom and Aus. When will it be available in Norway?

  Hi, I read your support page that the News widget is available only in the United States, the United Kingdom and Aus. When will it be available in Norway?

  Hello

  Just to let you know, it is a user to user community. You do not directly communicate with Apple here, so no one can say if or when Apple may have available in your area News widget, but what you can do is to provide feedback to Apple > http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

• Apple Watch: can I receive all messages from whatsapp on my Apple Watch, but not the Group whatsapp messages, don't know why... Help, please. Besides, my watch is custom in Spanish, but only answer messages Whatsapp understands English... someone kn

  I can receive all messages from whatsapp on my Apple Watch, but not the Group whatsapp messages, don't know why... Help, please.

  Besides, my watch is custom in Spanish, but only answer messages Whatsapp understands English... anyone know why? Thanks to you all!

  Hello

  To change the language for a response on your watch: Press answer > firmly press the screen > press on choose language > select Spanish.

• Boot Camp supports only Windows 7 or later installation on that platform. Please use a file ISO of Windows 7 or later installation.

  Hello

  I tried to fix this for hours, I hope someone can help me.

  I downloaded the ISO "Win10_1607_English_x64.iso" (4.29 GB) file and with him came a "info.plist" (2 KB), so they are both on my 64 GB USB Drive (format: MS-DOS (FAT32)) called 'WINSTALL '.

  I have the ISO on the USB key, and it is selected as the ISO image in Boot Camp. I also have the USB the disk of destination selected, and yet I get this error:

  Your bootable USB key could not be created

  Boot Camp supports only Windows 7 or later installation on that platform. Please use a file ISO of Windows 7 or later installation.

  I'm currently under OS X El Capitan Version 10.11.6 on my iMac (21.5 inch, end 2012) that is compatible with Windows 10.

  If anyone can help me I honestly love so much, I tried contacting Apple Support staff by phone, they said that they can't do anything, I tried to contact their Live Chat, but none of this has helped to solve the problem, and I tried to look online, but can't find too much.

  Thanks in advance for any answer!

  What OSX Version do you have? This site gives the requirements of Bootcamp: minimum system requirements to install Windows on your Mac with Boot Camp - Apple Support. And you did an upgrade? Could it be that the upgrade will not correctly for the OS?

  Looking at the 10 Windows version you downloaded, is the update of birthday, which was released less than a month ago. It could be that Apple is not reconisgin the Windows version when reading the disk, because it is too recent. I don't know if you have access to the download of the previous generation and do a Windows update?

• UC Logic Tablet supports only up to 10,10 Mac, what do I do?

  These guys: http://www.uc-logic.com/index.php?lang=en

  And here is a link directly to their drivers for the Tablet I use, the UC-Logic penates 10.1 SP: http://www.uc-logic.com/index.php?lang=en & action = support

  I've only had the Tablet year last too! x_x I've just updated to 10.11.4 mac and I kind of regret it because now my company as an independent artist is dead in the water because this Tablet does support up to 10,10 Mac. I don't know what to do!

  They never answer their emails and my phone folds out when I try to call their weird phone number. Is it possible to obtain software used exclusively for 10.10 work on a 10.11? I really need some sort of quick help, I won't be able to buy food and pay the Bills!

  Hello..

  You may be able to return to Yosemite v10.10 > http://www.macworld.co.uk/how-to/mac-software/delete-el-capitan-go-back-to-yosem ite-3581872 /

  Highly recommend to read all the information before proceeding.

  And back up all your important data before you return.

  If you are not comfortable doing it yourself, you can take your Mac to an Apple Store. They might come back your OS X for you.

  You can make an appointment at the Genius Barin advance.

• Toshiba 48L5445DG - Sat Receiver supports only 4 satellites?

  Hello

  today I installed 48L5445DG, but I see in the settings of the internal sat receiver only 4 Diseqcs, the problem is that I have 8/1 Diseqc and he wants to configure all 8.

  Is this possible?
  Just didn't expect internal receiver Toshiba supports only Diseqc 1.0.

  The TV supports internal DVB-S / DVB - S2 (HD) tuner.
  I think that the specifications of this tuner should be mentioned in the user manual.

  Have you checked it?

  Otherwise if the tuner supports 4 diseqcs I recommend to connect and to use a symbol external sat decoder.