Is it posible to the public ip address of the default locking?

Similar Questions

• BlackBerry 10 where can I find the default LockScreen background / 10.3.1

  Hello

  Maybe it's a silly question, I would like to use the default lock supplied with 10.3.1 background (the one below) as my main background as well, but I can't find it on my phone.

  Anyone know where it is stored? (not in "protected_media/wallpapers", apparently :-())

  

  Hello
  It's the wallpaper by default to your carrier, you can get it by going to options, display, and then click the Advanced button, which looks like an equalizer and then click «Reset for carrier wallpaper»

  Kind regards.

• I can map a public IP address on a pc using the router tplink?

  I can map a public IP address on a pc using the router tplink?

  Moved from the community involvement Center

  Original title: Port forwading

  Check with the support of tplink.

• Access to the COR to two XP systems behind a router with a single public IP address

  Hello

  is it possible to access the RDC to two XP systems, with two different port for the DRC, behind a router with a single public IP address?

  Please note this ia a small home network without any parameters of the field. I use IP to access DRC.

  You comments are appreciated.

  Thank you

  Use different ports for the DRC on both XP and configure the router to redirect to the appropriate port on the appropriate computer.

  See the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base How to change the listening port for remote desktop .

• Configure the router WRT54G with the PUBLIC IP address and use the DHCP protocol for internal computers

  Hello

  I have a service online Internet with 5 public IP addresses.

  The router and the AP are connected to a switch.

  I would like to set up a WRT54G Router with a public IP address and use DHCP (with private ip address) for the computers that will connect to the AP.

  That the AP is connected to the switch, it is possible that the other wired computers that are connected to the same switch can get an IP from the DHCP?

  Thanks in advance

  In this case, the routing is automatic.

  WRT54G configuration:

  WAN:

  Internet connection: static IP address

  IP address: 180.X. X 170

  Subnet mask: 255.255.255.248

  Gateway: 180.x.x.x (Ex: 180.x.x.1)

  DNS: servers your ISP DNS

  LAN:

  The IP address of the router: 10.10.10.1

  DHCP range: 10.10.10.100 of-online 10.10.10.200

• The router RSV4000 does support multiple public IP addresses

  I have a client who has a RSV4000 router. The customer also bought a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses for printers, either by configuring a static IP address on each printer directly or through mapping of intellectual property or any other method. Made support for RSV4000 using several treats public IP and if so what configuration is required in the router for printers to be seen by the outside world.

  Hi Winston,

  Thank you for posting. The functionality you need is one-to-one NAT, who does not have the RVS4000. Please watch the RV042 or RV220W for this feature.

• Numbering of the SIP Client IP addresses to public IP addresses

  Hello

  We are developing a new video network with VCS control and 2 highways of VCS. 1 expressway stressed the public internet address face and 2nd Expressway face partner network.

  Requirement: Internal SIP endpoint need dial IP address public (via Highway 1) and the IP address of the partner (via Highway 2). VCS control configured mode "calls to unknown IP address" to "Indirect".

  The two highways set up for 'Request to the unknown IP' mode to 'lead '.

  There is research on the VCS control rules to find the IP address.

  Priority 1 for IP address via 1st Highway

  Priority 2 for Ip address of partner via Highway 2.

  The two numbering IP addresses work, but component partner / IP address takes about 38 Sec to finish for the configuration of the call.

  When I look at the history of calls on the VCS control, I can see even for the search for the IP address of partners, 1 internet search Expressway and could not reach the IP address and then start to search on the highway of VCS partner and find the Ip address, like that it takes more time to complete the call.

  Sometimes, it is time and couldn't make a call of IP address to the IP address of the partner.

  is he kind, we can minismise the time for setting up call for the IP address of the partner numbering.

  Kind regards

  Chris

  Chris,

  try to disable SIP UDP on both motorways as this should reduce the appeal of 30 seconds preparation time.

  Hope this helps,

  Andreas

• EX90 two autonomous with the public IP address can make video calls among them self on the Internet or not?

  Dear expert;

  I am very new to VCS and TP Cisco.

  We implement now presence Cisco TV with VCS - C, VCS-E TMS, TCS, MCUS and endpoints with Jabber in a single edit.

  and in another configuration CUCM 10.5, UCCX 10.5 IM & P, Jabber with some 10 officers.

  Now the question is in our building on the 2nd floor we have an EX90 and on the 5th floor an EX90 and on local network, we can make video calls using the IP address.

  In the same way is it possible to make a video call between 2 devices EX90 (both have public IP) present in a location different in the same city on the Internet without the participation of VCS - C and VCS-E.

  It's the client request :)

  Concerning

  Paiva

  Yes, but leaving these systems outside in nature with public IP addresses, leaving you are vulnerable to a number of questions. See for example http://www.videonationsltd.co.uk/2014/11/h-323-cisco-spam-calls/

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12336591/sourceh323idcisco-incomingcalls

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12340591/nuisance-h323-calls-SX20

  The offers above with H.323 calls, in addition to this, you will encounter similar problems using SIP where the systems will be analyzed by tools such as SIPVicious

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and mark questions as "answered" as appropriate

• A Site to remote access VPN behind the same public IP address

  Got a problem quite stupid.  We have a VPN from Site to Site configured for a new data center, which will be responsible for general traffic management.  In addition, some users need to use use a VPN client to access certain areas.  The firewall at the Office only has a public IP address, so the two will come to the Site to Site VPN for remote access from the same source.

  This seems a problem with legacy Cisco VPN clients because encryption card matches the entry VPN site-to-site, even if they use VPN clients.  A good/simple solution to solve this problem?

  Some newspapers (198.18.85.23) is the address public IP for the office and the tom.jones is the user.  192.168.1.0/24 is the pool of the VPN client.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713130-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 737003-5-ASA: PISG: DHCP not configured, no viable servers found for tunnel-group "Corp-VPN.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713119-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713061: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, IPSec tunnel rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card remote proxy 192.168.1.4/255.255.255.255/0/0 local 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 on the interface outside

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x00007fff28dab560, mess id 0x37575f3c).

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713259-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, Session is be demolished. Reason: political crypto card not found

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-4-113019: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, disconnected Session. Session type: IKEv1, duration: 0 h: 00 m: 02s, xmt bytes: 0, RRs bytes: 0, right: not found card crypto policy

  January 7, 2014 19:12:53 ASA5515: % 713904-5-ASA: IP = 198.18.85.23, encrypted packet received with any HIS correspondent, drop

  Hello

  Don't know if this will work, but you can try the following configuration (with the rest of the VPN configuration)

  list-access CLIENT VPN ip enable any 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 is the VPN CLIENT address

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set peer 198.18.85.23

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-3DES-SHA

  The idea would be to have the ACL matches the VPN full Tunnel that the Client attempts to establish. (destination "any" from the point of view of the customer, the ASAs view source)

  I tested briefly on my own SAA by connecting from an IP address to which the ASA offers free VPN in L2L. But as I don't have the operational L2L VPN, I can't really verify the VPN L2L at the moment. Thus, certain risks may be involved if you can afford it.

  -Jouni

• Configure my VCSC with VCSe on the public IP address

  Hi guys,.

  I have a session of control VCS under my company Private IP and I my client on public IP VCSe.

  It will be possible to configure my VCSC with the VCSe after the configuration of the areas?

  The ports must be opened by my team of firewall in this scenario?

  Anything else I need to keep in mind.

  For the record, it is only for the objective test.

  You will appreciate any response.

  Thank you

  Saurabh

  > Then, practically there is no as such risk, and my client can use the public IP address on VCSe

  > without going to double network Option key. (which is used to secure more VCSe).

  Cisco highly recommend VCS-E deploy under the DMZ but it's true, too, many customers deploy VCS - E on public network directly.

  Please visit https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2154738?tstart=150 for more information security VCS.

  Next version of the plan to be supported VCS X7.2 software build - in the characteristic basic firewall, which allows configuration to allow/deny list based on the IP / port / protocol which should contribute to better security level or even VCS-E deployment on the public network directly.

  > So, I'll ask my client just buy a public IP address, that's all, and we are ready to go?

  A public IP will demand on VCS Expressway, VCS control can be use the NAT address glow (IE share internet access of the network of offices).

  You must also SRV DNS management (if small deployment probably better to use the external DNS service, there are a lot of company provide a service the two service also responsible DNS hosting and as free service).

• PIX 7 - several remote VPN sessions to the same public IP address

  Hello

  Here's my problem:

  Employee A and employee B make VPN connections to the PIX even with their Cisco VPN clients. The two employees are behind the same NAT device, so have the same public IP address.

  As soon as the second employee initiates the VPN connection, the first employee is disconnected.

  I have a similar situation with a PIX 6.x version and it does not. Two employees can connect at the same time with the same credentials.

  Here is the configuration of remote access VPN I use:

  attributes of the strategy group gpolicy

  DHCP-scope network 10.X.X.X

  VPN - 5 concurrent connections

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  enable IPSec-udp

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list splitTunnelAcl

  the authentication of the user activation

  the firewall client no

  remoteuser password remotepass username

  remoteuser attributes username

  VPN-group-policy labtronix

  VPN - connections 2

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  value of group-lock vpngroup

  tunnel-group vpngroup type ipsec-ra

  tunnel-group vpngroup General attributes

  address ip_pool pool

  Group Policy - by default-gpolicy

  Any contribution is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Most likely problem of nat - t

  Add "isakmp nat-traversal" in pix

• ASA 5520: SSL VPN by using a different IP address that the ASA public IP address

  Hi guys,.

  I'm trying to configure an SSL VPN on a Cisco ASA5520.

  Unfortunately port 443 interface OUTSIDE of the SAA is already used by Microsoft Outlook Web Access and I can not change the configuration of Outlook. This configuration already in place allows me to use the public IP address of the ASA as IP Cisco VPN for the Web page.

  I don't not want to use a different port so to keep life easy for users.

  I have a few available public IPs that I can use so I wanted to use one of them instead of the OUTSIDE of the ASA interface. Any idea how I could do?

  Thank you

  Dario

  Unfortunately you can not use any other public ip address, except the ASA outside IP interface to complete the SSL VPN.

  The only options that you have is to change the Outlook to use another port or the SSL VPN to use a different port.

• internal web server access to the content of the network using the public ip address

  Hi, I saw similar topics, but not a clear answer about it. I have a PIX 515e with two interfaces, a web server internal (ip 192.168.0.5) and internal users want to access the server by its (99.99.99.9) ie public ip address is not using DNS. Tried the command alias ' alias (inside) 99.99.99.9 192.168.0.5 "but does not work for http. I can access the server on the local network using the public address for smtp, pop3 and ftp with or without command alias, but not the http service. Any idea?

  a few quick comments.

  a function of the command "alias" is to force the pix to manipulate the dns response. However, you mentioned that you didn't use dns.

  'alias' command will also force the pix to send traffic to 192.168.0.5 when it receives a packet from the inside and intended to be 99.99.99.9. However, since the host and the server are located in the same segment, i.e. pix must re - route the packet to the inside interface, and this operation is not supported with pix v6.x.

  In addition, you mentioned the inside host can access the smtp, pop3 and ftp using 99.99.99.9. This is interesting because the host of 192.168.0.0 would not directly have access to the host of 99.99.99.x without router.

• ASA 5510 VPN - using a public IP address for the local network

  Hello, I have a problem which is probably very simple, but I can't seem to understand.

  I set up a site IPsec connection to another with a company, something I've done many times before without a problem. I use ASDM to configure this, because it is quick and painless, usually.

  We have one number of other site-to-site currently configured connections and works very well on this ASA, these are configured with the "Protected network - LAN" configured with the IP private of hosts within our network, we want to make available through the separate tunnels. This includes the configuration setting on our ASA for each connection to "guests aside ASA exempt from NAT.

  With this new link, however, the company asked us to use a public IP address for the host that we want to achieve through the tunnel. I don't know why, but they demand it. So I added a NAT rule for inside the host and set up the connection with the public IP address under "Local network". During the test to try to reach a host to their side, the tunnel didn't even try to open.

  What is the method here? I don't see where I'm wrong. I'm guessing that the 'host side ASA exempt from NAT' does not require for this, how if the ASA would know which internal host is the public IP address.

  Any ideas?

  Hi Leo,

  The steps are:

  1. Add the policy rule NAT for the specific host.

  2 - define the IP NAT as your LOCAL NETWORK address in the encryption settings.

  3 make sure that there is no rule NAT exempt for this host to the specific destination.

  What happens if you run a package tracer?

  Thank you.

• How can I hold the public IP address on a specific profile on the asa 5510

  Hi guys

  How can I hold the public IP address on my session NAT VPN cisco customer for no one else can use it? I have a cisco ASA 5510

  the Interior is 172.10.20.86

  public 166.245.192.90

  Need to call my ISP?

  Thank you

  Sorry to say but your qustion is not very clear. Can you please post what you are trying to achieve?

  Thank you

  Ajay