Is it possible to build a vpn tunnel to the DMZ on a pix 515 interface?

Similar Questions

• VPN tunnel between the concentrator 3005 and router Cisco 827

  I am trying to establish a VPN tunnel between the Central Office with VPN 3005 and controller branch Cisco 827 router.

  There is a router of perimeter with access set up in front of the 3005 list.

  I quote the ACLs on the Central perimeter router instructionsuivante to allow traffic to permit ip 3005 - acl 101 all 193.188.X.X (address of the hub)

  I get the following message appears when I try to ping a local host in the Central site.

  Can Anyoune give me the correct steps to 827 and 3005.

  Thank you

  CCNP Ansar.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  encryption of debugging engine

  Debug crypto his

  debug output

  ------------------

  1d20h: IPSEC (sa_request):,.

  (Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = 172.22.113.41, distance = 193.188.108.165.

  local_proxy = 202.71.244.160/255.255.255.240/0/0 (type = 4),

  remote_proxy = 128.128.1.78/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

  Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

  lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,

  SPI = 0x83B8AC1B (2209917979), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0x400D

  1d20h: ISAKMP: ke received message (1/1)

  1d20h: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM

  Former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): early changes of Main Mode

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): will increment the error counter on his: retransmit the phase 1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): will increment the error counter on his: retransmit the phase 1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 1,.

  You must also allow the esp Protocol in your ACL.

  access-list 101 permit esp any host x.x.x.x (address of the hub)

  Hope this helps,

  -Nairi

• Problems with VPN tunnels after the upgrade to PIX 7.0

  It seems that Cisco has revamped the VPN process on the new Version of PIX 7.0.

  After I've upgraded, I noticed that AH (i.e. ah-sha-hmac, ah-md5-hmac) was no longer supported and all my container transformation games OH no were not converted.

  Another question, if you have enabled on Versieon 6.3, names when you upgrade, tunnel groups will be created (formerly "identity isakmp crypto, crypto key isakmp peer ') which will include a hostname (hostname of identity) instead of IP as it was to the point 6.3. Guess what... Nothing works! Having to delete and recreate it using the IP address.

  See an example...

  tunnel-group OTHER_END type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group OTHER_END

  pre-shared-key *.

  The above does not work... Having to recreate using the IP address mapped to OTHER_END...

  tunnel-group 2.2.2.2 type ipsec-l2l

  2.2.2.2 tunnel-group ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  Furthermore, I have problems with my racoon and freeswan extranet... Did someone recently updated with success and other gateways VPN provider (i.e. checkpoint, Freeswan and Racoon) work?

  We found the solution for this problem. It appeared that the perfect forward secrecy is enabled at the other side. If a 'card crypto outside_map 10 set pfs' is necessary. With the pix 6.3 version that appears not to make the difference, the vpn works even with pfs disabled on the side of pix.

• Is it possible to build a paralellagram to consider the angle that produced an image?

  Is it possible to build a paralellagram to consider the angle that produced an image?

  You can correct for tilt using free transform > Skew, or control by dragging a handle from Center.  Is that what you meant?

  

• GRE and IPSEC VPN tunnel over the same interface

  My client is currently connected to a service provider of call through a GRE Tunnel over IPSEC. They chose to move all connections to a VPN site-to-site traditional behind a firewall, here, to your corp office.  As the questions says, is possible for me to put in place the VPN site to site on the same router? Interface Tunnelx both ethernet have the same encryption card assigned to the destination router.  I thought that traffic could divide by identification of traffic 'interesting '.  Thanks for all the ideas, suggestions

  Ray

  Ray

  Thanks for the additional information. It takes so that the existing entries in ACL 101 remain so the existing tunnel will still work. And you have to add entries that will allow the new tunnel. Editing an ACL that is actively filtering traffic can get complicated. Here is a technique that I use sometimes.

  -create a new access list (perhaps ACL 102 assuming that 102 is not already in use).

  -Copy the entries of ACL 101 to 102 and add additional entries you need in places appropriate in the ACL.

  -Once the new version of the ACL is complete in the config, then go tho the interface and change the ip access-group to point to the new ACL.

  This provides a transition that does not affect traffic. And he made it back to the original easy - especially if something does not work as expected in the new ACL.

  If the encryption of the remote card has an entry for GRE and a separate entrance for the IPSec which is a good thing and should work. I guess card crypto for GRE entry specifies an access list that allows the GRE traffic and for IPSec crypto map entry points to a different access list that identifies the IP traffic is encrypted through the IPSec tunnel.

  HTH

  Rick

• On Pix VPN tunnel to the same subnet

  I have a customer who want to set up a the PIX VPN tunnel located on each site. For some reason, each side has the same subnet number, for example. 10.10.10.x/32. I'm sure we must run NAT, but is it possible.

  This can help

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949f1.shtml

• How to get to the VPN tunnel to the subnet 2/3

  I have not yet tried something else a few years back I got on my back which head with an ASA firewall you cannot route traffic to a subnet of second or third (it's 2 or 3 jumps away) on a same VPN tunnel if you add routes to all LAN subnets in all required firewall and tunnels.

  I know other manufacturers such as SonicWall, here you can do it, so the question is, is possible in the firewall Cisco ASA with version 7.07 and 7.2.4? If this is not the case, is it possible in a future release? and if this is not possible, how can I make it work? I can't work with a firewall router 1 LAN to LAN s 3?

  Attached are also a network card for the visualization of all subnets.

  Thanks in advance

  Johan Mannerstrom

  ICT technician

  If the firewall HQ is already connected to LAN2 (way I mean), then you have even connect an interface on the firewall of HQ and in him giving an ip address that belongs to LAN2. As firewall HQ has a route to 192.168.20.0/24 and 18.0/24 and vice versa, that's enough.

  And you're on the point on the rest of the steps you have provided regarding the config.

  And of course, you must configure matching exemption to ACL and NAT image mirror on the remote VPN encryption too.

• Two VPN tunnels on the same device with the same protected networks

  There is a remote site that wants me to put in place two separate tunnels of VPN with the same internal IP at each end. FOR EXAMPLE

  LAN = 10.212.170.201/32, 10.212.170.202/32

  Remote network 192.168.0.0/24 =

  I currently have a tunnel between the above:

  End Point distance = 111.93.152.186

  Local endpoint point = 198.205.115.252

  Now, they want to set up a VPN for the same networks between:

  End Point distance = 115.115.130.34

  Local endpoint point = 198.205.115.252

  It is my understanding that the Cisco ASA 5520 can do. The only way I've seen this done with Cisco hardware is to use two ASAs, but there may be a way to use the costs of road or some other tricks to make it happen.

  I'm open to suggestions.

  Is a backup?

  In, specify endpoint remote second as a "backup" of the peer in the first virtual private network.  Alone will be active at the time - but there are toggled if the VPN in first dies.

• VPN Tunnel to the TOP but no traffic passing (PIX515)

  I'll put up a remote engineers access to off-site to access my network (using the cisco vpn client). I use PIX 515E software version 7.0 (3) 20 as a vpn server. I can establish a tunnel, but I can't access network resources. I can ping the external interface of the PIX. This is my setup: internet-router-pix-dmz(server farm). Please find attached my setup. Thanks in advance.

  After a glance at your policy, it seems that the Pool of IP, that is assigned to the clients behind the outside interface, runs behind the DMZ. I don't think it will work.

  In addition, defined distribution policy seems to be backward. Im sure that you intend to send traffic FROM the IP pool to 196.26.12.64/26. Your acl split is the opposite.

  In addition, your routing table does not contain a route for the 196 network, so the firewall will use the default route to the outside. If this is intentional, the clients and dst are on the outside, which is considered to be crossed. This is allowed on the SAA only with the same security setting configured.

• An easy - how bounce a VPN tunnel from the command line?

  I think I know the answer, but must ensure. Is - what the command to bounce a VPN?

  his clear crypto ipsec peer

  Just to check - this command does not delete the config, but simply bounces, right?

  For customers of IOS VPN...

  your order will only cause me to generate a new key when I send more traffic... just tried...

  For the ASA VPN Clients we have

  ASA - fw # vpn - sessiondb logoff?

  all the all sessions

  proxy email Email-Proxy sessions

  specific session to Index the index

  specific sessions address IP IPAddress

  IPsec LAN-to-LAN l2l sessions

  name user name specific sessions

  sessions specific Protocol

  remote access remote IPsec sessions

  sessions of customer VPN SSL SVC

  Group-Tunnel tunnel-group sessions

  Mgmt of VPN VPN - lb load balancing sessions

  WebVPN WebVPN sessions

• VPN tunnel using the public as IP being the preserve of LAN to LAN encryption

  I have a question who responded to variations throughout the forum, and I feel that my beginner status will be clear. Here is my installation problem... I use a Cisco ASA 5506 and I connect to a provider. I just need the configuration on the local side that they manipulate to their side.

  Internal IP range
  192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  Public IP address from ISP

  97.X.X.22

  174.X.X.194

  Config required by the seller.

  All Http Https traffic must come from the 97.X.X.22

  local peer 97.X.X.22

  remote peer 144.X.X.25

  Our local encryption field must be a public IP address: 174.X.X.194/32

  Areas of remote encryption:

  207.X.X.0 255.255.255.0

  144.X.X.90 255.255.255.255
  144.X.X.91 255.255.255.255
  144.X.X.22 255.255.255.255
  144.X.X.25 255.255.255.255

  currently I have the external value 97.X.X.22
  

  I know now that I need to NAT all inside the traffic destined for the remote areas of encryption to 174.X.X.194/32 and then move the valuable traffic to the VPN.

  I use the ASA Version 9.5 (2) can someone help me so that I can avoid interruptions of service, it will be very appreciated. ?

  You will need to modify the ACL Crypto to be the public IP address you use

  outside_cryptomap_1 list extended access permit ip host 174.X.X.194 object-group SP

  --

  Please do not forget to select a correct answer and rate useful posts

• Possible to assign security levels in the VPN tunnel?

  Currently I have a PIX-2-ASA VPN tunnel works without any problem.

  Here's my problem, I want to know if there is a way to configure one side of the tunnel as an interface "drop safety" of sorts. I want only one side to be able to open traffic.

  ACLs are not useful on one side at least as return traffic generated on the random ports. I want only one side to answer Insider sessions, but not be able to start a session on its own.

  Since the terminiates of VPN tunnel on the external interface, the security level of each side is '0 '. If all traffic behind on part and on the other the tunnel can innitate sessions.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Edit: One side is a v6.3 (5) of PIX515E, another ASA5510 v7.2 (1)

  Hello

  On your ASA, you can specify the following 3 connection types in your crypto card:

  1 crypto map set type of connection are created only

  2 crypto map set connection type response only

  3 crypto map set-type of two-way connection

  This should allow you to control what end can initiate the tunnel.

  Concerning

  Pradeep

• CSM and existing VPN tunnels

  I ran into an issue in the past. When you install the CSM for the first time in an environment where there is an existing VPN network, the product will not reflect existing VPN tunnels in the map view.

  I tried to import existing configurations using all means possible (to leave RDC, from text in my computer files or simply to find) but CSM doesn? t seem to fall under the existing configuration to view these pipes to the card. Looks like you have to build WHC otherwise they will not show.

  Someone at - he found a way to make this possible? Is this really possible? There is another technology that MSC will not pick up from an existing configuration?

  I understand that this may not be a problem given that the MSC is a policy management solution and not a follow-up, but it would be nice to be able to continue to add tunnels with CSM of a work in progress.

  I have? He's appreciate any input on this.

  What version of CSM do you use?

  Have you tried discovered vpn?

  If you are using CSM3.1, then you can discover the vpn and therefore be able to see the tunnel vpn for the card too.

  HTH,

  Radhika

• NAT, ASA, 2 neworks and a VPN tunnel

  Hello. I have a following question. I am trying to establish a VPN tunnel to a remote network used to be connected to our via a VPN tunnel. The problem is that the previous tunnel their share has been created for the x.x.x.x our coast network which will serve no more time a month, but is currently still active and used. As I'm trying to get this VPN tunnel as soon as possible without going through all the paperwork on the other side (political, don't ask) is it possible to make NAT of the new network in the network x.x.x.x for traffic through the VPN tunnel.

  Something like this:

  new network-> policy NAT in old x.x.x.x fork on ASA-> VPN tunnel to the remote network using x.x.x.x addresses

  It is possible to add the new policy, but sometimes it can conflict with the former.

• How to limit the bandwidth in the VPN Tunnels in RV082?

  Hello

  It is possible to limit the bandwidth of the IPSEC VPN Tunnels or the traffic that goes through the tunnels?

  Use IP addresses or port numbers the same way and clients when limiting bandwidth to clients in the local network?

  Thank you very much

  Oliver

  There is a way to solve internal IP addresses, protocols or ports and specify the bandwidth

  I send you the links to access information on how to set it up.

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=3c09b393e3744ffd98330fd0031a4aa2_4228.XML&PID=80&converted=0