ISE and self-registration

Similar Questions

• R2PS3: Issue when adding Custom Encryted UDF in Create User, edit user and self-registration page

  Hi all

  I have a requirement to add a field encrypted to create a user, change the user and self-registration pages.

  Currently, I get no option to add the encrypted type in the form field, the only option I get is to add "ADF w/Label input text. However, when I add the field encrypted as a text field in these forms, I am able to see the text entered by the user. Although, as the field is encrypted, the value of the field is not visible in the user display.

  A time implementation of this scenario?

  Snapshots:

  

  Question: Value of the attribute appears as a clear text.

  

  Thank you

  Swati Pandey

  I even tried with adf and the properties of the text of entry as the secret so that I am able to get the desired result.

• Cisco ISE password temporary self-registration

  Hello

  Is there a way to change the strategy of password on the temporary password that generates ISE during free registration on the portal of comments?

  Thank you

  Sarat

  Have you tried the settings under: guest access > settings > Guest Password policy

  Those setting are global and should have an impact on all the comments user passwords.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• I CAN'T GET THE WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER! Self-registration FAILED with Visual Studio 2010!

  Hello world!

  I just bought the Visual Studio 2010 Professional Edition, registered and everything. I have the Windows XP operating system and I wanted to do a media player using WindowsMediaPlayer, I. I saw on YouTube that all you had to do was simply right click, add click on choose the elements and go to components and click on WindowsMediaPlayer. I couldn't find that if I used Google and found that he had to go in System32, then click wmp.dll. After I did, he said

  "Self-registration impossible C:\WINDOWS\system32\wmp.dll.

  I want this thing so BADLY!

  Any help would be VERY VERY LARGELY APPRECIATED!

  Thank you

  TheElevatorMaster

  Hello
   
  Your Windows XP question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the public to MSDN development.
  Please post your question in the MSDN Visual Studio category. 
   
  
  I hope this helps.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• Self-registration in OIM 11G

  When a user registers with the free registration page. Approval workflow is triggered that is assigned to the system administrator. System administration approves the application (System Administrator) must assign the user organization
  
  My requirement is to include the attribute as an organization, Type of employee in the Self registration page and request auto shud approved.
  
  
  Please suggest on this
  
  
  Concerning
  A presilia

  It may be useful:

  http://identityandaccessmanager.blogspot.com/2011/03/suppress-approval-self-registration.html

• Installation of ISE and ACS

  Hi all

  I have a problem to install ISE and ACS on VM server. Linux Redhat Enterprise is detected by the system when the iso file is selected.

  But some dependencies of the package are noticed as openssl kernel-devel or cisco...

  The installation will stop from print virtual daemon.

  Any help!

  OK, I recommend:

  1. check that all the VM gusts are configured to meet the required specifications (RAM, CPU, disk space, etc.)

  2 re - download the ISO file and try the installation again

  3. download and try OVA

  Let us know how it goes :)

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

  I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

  When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

  Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

  networkdevicegroups.PNG

  

  And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

  devicecondition.PNG

  

  This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

• ISE and AirWatch MDM integration

  I have been using ISE with the integration of AirWatch for over a year.  Recently, it seems that AirWatch has updated their certificates and now I can't get ISE and AirWatch to communicate.  I can access the AirWatch API URL through a browser, and I see that the browser uses TLS 1.2.     According to TAC, Cisco, ISE does not support TLS 1.2.  I have cases open with two TACS, but have yet to find a resolution.

  Someone at - it ISE / Airwatch integration currently work?

  Wes,

  I have a client who had what sounds like the same issue.  It came down to AirWatch change the host he was using. It was a long journey to get to the right answer but when AirWatch changed host, things started working again.  It took several calls with AirWatch until someone had the idea to make this change.

  Hope that helps.

  Tim

• 1.2 of the ISE and made maximum PSN supported in my Persona config

  Hello people, I am setting up a way large-scale distributed of ISE and I was wondering if anyone could tell me what the maximum number of PSN is allowed in this configuration.   I was reading through an older training document with version 1.1 and suggested 5, that's why I wonder if the specs changed on 1.2 but I can't find them anywhere to practice.

  I have a large virtual machine running the MAIN admin character who is also secondary to my report & follow-up in my main data centre.

  In another State (bound to 10G) is another large VM acting as my character high school admin with primary oversight & reports.

  Across several States I want to have multiple Ssnp through geographic patterns of each State, but I don't know if I can put across enough with my current version of 1.2 and my persona config Ssnp listed above.    I need about 12 to 15 Ssnp.

  I was wondering if I need two VMs more out of my control as a node in DC1 and secondary surveillance in DC2 for more extensibility PSN.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  -Thank you

  As Marvin suggested, I would look at using 1.3 at this point, unless you have any specific concerns of this version and I really want to stay with 1.2. That being said, here are my recommendations/comments:

  -Two v1.2 and v1.3 fits in fact up to 40 knots PSN

  -If none of the nodes of your PSN will be put in the same place and are layer 2 adjacent I recommend putting them in a group node and behind a load balancer. If you do not have a load balancer, I would always put them in a node group. At this time a node group can have up to 10 PSN

  -If you have 10-15 knots PSN then you should spend 2 nodes for specifically for the character of monitoring

  -The period of maximum round trip between all nodes must not exceed 200 ms

  For more information, you can always reference the "Network deployment" section in the installation guide material for ISE:

  v1.3

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-3/installation_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide13/b_ise_InstallationGuide12_chapter_00.html

  v1.2

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_deploy.html

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• 1.3 of the ISE and NAC

  I have a client that 5508 WLCs runs through the area, and I'm catching IEEE802.1x authentication for the enterprise WLAN and WebAuth for WLAN of comments... they PSK now :(

  They have ad and ISE and NAC great interest, so my immediate thoughts are to integrate ISE AD and use ISE as RADIUS server for .1x on the WLC. Then use the WLC and ISE do WebAuth for comments... It's all of the standard stuff, but it gives the background.

  Now, we come to the interesting bit... they want to run BYOD. They are involved in the financial markets, so the BYOD must be tightly controlled. They ask on ISE coupled with the NAC, but I am not convinced that I need the NAC since the arrival of the ISE1.3. Of course, I will examine three (min) SSID, corporate knowledge, comments and BYOD, just logically distinct. I have nothing that ISE 1.2 cannot press the company and comments but BYOD must full profiling and reclamation prohibition or device before access to the net.

  Someone at - he comments or suggestions? Is ISE 1.3 enough NAC-like that I don't need more, or if this is not the case, what additional benefits does that ISE can support

  Thanks for your advice/comments/experiences

  Jim

  Hi Jim -.

  Version 1.3 offers an integrated PKI and a significantly improved services reviews experience. The internal PKI is nice if the customer does not have a PKI solution in place. Don't forget however that the PKI ISE internal can only issue certificates to BYOD devices which have boarded through the ISE BYOD "flow", you cannot use the ISE PKI to issue certificates to computers in the domain.

  With regard to the NAC: you need to specify exactly what is needed here. If you were to make "posture assessment" then ISE can do for machines based on Windows and OSX. You can check for things like: A / V, a/s, status of the firewall, Windows hotfixes. If you want to make the posture on mobile devices, so you will need to integrate ISE with MDM (mobile device management) solution such as: Airwatch, Mobile, Extend360 iron, etc. ISE may question the MDM for things like: the device is protected with a PIN, is the rooted device, is the encrypted device, etc.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and WLC Access-List Design/scalability

  Hello

  I have a scenario that wireless clients are authenticated by the ISE and different ACL is applied depending on the rules in the ISE. The problem I have seen is due to the limitation on the Cisco WLC that limit only 64 input access list. As the installer has only a few IVR/interfaces and several different access lists are applied to the same base on user groups interface; I was wondering if there may be an evolutionary design / approach according to which the access list entries can evolve next to create a vlan for each group of users and apply the access list on the interface of layer 3 instead? I illustrated the configuration below for reference:

  Group of users 1 - apply ACL 1 - on Vlan 1

  User 2 group - apply ACL 2 - on the Vlan 1

  3 user group - apply ACL 3 - on the Vlan 1

  The problem appears only for wireless users, he does not see on wired users as the ACLs can be applied successfully without restriction as to the switches.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  In fact, you have limitations on the side of the switch as well. Long ACL can deplete resources AAGR of the switch. Take a look at this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-3750-series-switches/68461-high-CPU-utilization-cat3750.html

  The new WLCs based on IOS XE and not the old OS Wireless/Aironet will provide the best experience in these matters.

  Overall, I see three ways to overcome your current number:

  1. reduce the ACL by making them less specific

  2 use L3 interfaces on a switch L3 or FW and the ACL is applied to them

  3. use the SGT/SGA

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Difference between ISE and NAC?

  Dear all,

  Can you please help to understand difference ISE and NAC?

  Thank you

  Eve.

  ACS + NAC Profiler + comments the NAC + Manager = EHT NAC NAC Server

  ISE does:

  Centralized strategies
  RADIUS server
  Evaluation of posture
  Guest access services
  Profiling feature
  MDM
  Monitoring
  Troubleshooting
  Reporting

• Profilinh ISE and Thin Clients

  I have 1.2 ISE and HP T610 customer light on the network

  802.1 x authorization works correctly, but clients are looming as HP-devices generics or HP printers

  I don't know how to create a strategy profiling custom for device "HP Thin Client.

  What conditions YES to assign customers HP T610?

  Thanks in advance,

  Vice

  Refer to the Profiler service to power down

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-2/user_guide/ise_user_guide/ise_prof_pol.html#wp1891315

  Profile services food application for permit in advance

• ISE and WLC for sanitation of the posture

  Please can someone clarify a few things regarding the ISE and posture wireless.

  (1) is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for conversion, or is it just an ACL to redirect some of the posture of the kickoff checking traffic?

  (2) can / a dACL/wACL list must be specified as a sanitation ACL?

  (3) the WLC ACL should be written in long format (manually specify source and dest ports/doesny direction any job?)

  (4) does anyone have working example ACL for redirect (CPC) posture and sanitation (dACL)?

  (5) any other advice or pointers would be as useful as any docs I have found so far, what he TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, do not seem to help me understand sanitation and WLC posture

  Thank you

  Nick

  Yes,

  This means that strategy available to your customer does not have a rule that will correspond to an entrepreneur who joined the network. Can you post a screenshot of the provisioning of customer policy?

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• ISE and ASA5505

  Hello all - I'm working with a client on a deployment of the ISE and that they would like remote locations enjoy to dot1X.  The potential problem I see is - what - they have ASA5505s for the tunnels to the main location, which is great, but they also use the integrated... switch I know there are problems with the largest ASAs requiring the IPN.  I wonder if they will need a different switch to make it work?  Don't think they plan on posture or whatever it is advanced.  More just to lock the switchports and avoid problems when people plug random devices to keep them out of the network...

  any suggestions are appreciated.

  Scott J.

  Scott,

  If you are referring to the ports on the SAA, these are not supported dot1x. You will need a switch different in order to get this dot1x features you're looking for.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.