Issue of tables merging

Similar Questions

• Tables merged does not appear in the expected location

  I generated a merge document that incorporates a Table. Once completed in v4.3, the table appears in the middle of the first page of the merged document. In the latest 5.5.2 table starts on the second page only, but since it's a long table break occurs on pages 2 and 3 of the merged document. How it makes the Table appear on the first page?

  Update: the problem in merged letters disappeared after update Pages 5.6.1.

• issue with tables and clusters

  Hello

  Another issue with the tables and clusters. I have three engines thatI move on XYZ and then measure something. I need to draw on the 3D, the result of the measurement. How to draw real XYZ and not the index of the data table positions? (I can't actully how to build the matrices 2D forX, Y and Z). In the figures, I give an example of what I need.

  Concerning

  You have to break the data out of the cluster and to present them to the graph 3d to a separate bays for X, Y, Z and W where 'W' is your values measured at the locations described by X, Y, Z.

  This thread shows how trace readings in space 3. The following image shows the data that the original author wanted to draw.

  

  Have fun

  Ben

• complex tables, merging

  Hello

  I've attached a photo, because it is difficult to explain, but I want to merge 2 tables 2D, but so that the empty spots do zero, is there a special table VI for that? See drawing:

  It could also end up in Rube Goldberg

  

• Issue of table + write to the file

  Hello, I am using USB-6009 with Labview 8.5

  I searched and passed tutorial table and still confused about acquisition of data...:)

  So here's what I'm doing (simple)

  I have two tension analog (AI0 AI1) returns through the DAQ assistant

  and I would like to follow up respectively and finally want to write them in lvm format or csv format...

  Question 1.

  Can I have an example of table VI with the DAQ assistant? all the tutorials I went on

  they are only about numbers--not the dynamic data...

  I think of... convert data into DBL and reorganize somehow to each table to the graph of the monitor

  Question 2.

  so I cut the data by using the table to display the monitor, then I will add both the value of the data in table

  to write to the file? or... is it possible to write in the file directly from the Daq Assistant, write on the file VI?

  Quesetion 3.

  If so, could you tell me how this writing on a file to save the data? 1st column with odd rank-> AI0

  1st column with the same line-> A1... something like that?

  Thanks, I spent about 3 hours of that, google them, read the help of labview and helped a lot

  1. you should be able to double-click the convert to Dynamic Data and convert the waveform in a table.

  2. just connect the output of the VI DAQmx Express write it on the Express VI of LVM.

• Related issue FrameMaker table...

  Hi all

  I have a table that was on Page 1 anchor marker.

  

  Then Tmeasurement starts at the 2 Page with title, the header of the table and the rows of the Table (only 2 rows and the other half of the page is empty); then additional lines must begin on Page 3.

  So, how can I make my table begins with the anchor marker and not let too many empty spaces?

  

  Hope my question makes sense. Thank you.

  The table extend pages?

  If so, the problem is probably the Format line keep with next/previous

  If the problem is that the table is to the page, but for the space occupied by the para anchor, see:
  Title, title, line-Align multi-column Tables

  Same trick works for a table to start at the top of the frame.

• two table Merge

  TABLE-A

  SELECT * FROM A

  ---------------------------

  ID

  --------------------------

  1

  2

  TABLE-B

  SELECT * FROM A

  ---------------------------

  NAME

  ----------------------------

  MARY

  JOHN

  I want to SELECT results

  ID NAME

  ---------------------------

  MARY

  JOHN

  1 MARY

  1 JOHN

  MARIE 2

  2 JOHN

  -----------------------------------
  How do I?

  Try the below

  SELECT CAST (NULL AS NUMBER (10)), the name OF tableB

  UNION ALL

  SELECT id, name FROM tableA, tableB.

  Post edited by: 000000

• Store XML in the schema issue generated tables and XML Validation against the schema.

  Hello friends,

  I am facing a problem where to store xml in a saved schema generated from tables.

  It's my diagram

  --

  <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"? >

  " < xs: schema xmlns:ds = ' http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig# "" xmlns: XS = " " http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema "xmlns =" " http://www.ABC.inf.in/test "targetNamespace =" " http://www.abc.inf.in/test" elementFormDefault = "qualified" attributeFormDefault = "unqualified" > "

  < xs: include schemaLocation = "abc.xsd" / >

  < xs: element name = "project" type = 'student' >

  < xs: annotation >

  < Intention > it is a Documentation < / intention >

  < / xs: annotation >

  < / xs: element >

  < / xs: Schema >

  -This is my xml document

  "< project versão ="2.00"xmlns ="http://www.abc.inf.in/test">."

  "< test xmlns ="http://www.abc.inf.in/test">."

  " < intest version ="2.00"Id ="testabc"xmlns: xsi =" http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance "  >

  < ide >

  < cUF > 35 < / cUF >

  < cNF > 59386422 < / cNF >

  < natOp > This is post < / natOp >

  < indPag > 1 < / indPag >

  < mod > 55 < / mod >

  < set > 1 < / series >

  < / ide >...

  .....................

  Giving not complete because it is too long.

  1. I registered successfully of the schemas in the database

  2. then I generate the saved schema table

  2. in my java code I have validated the document XML schema compared and it's valid successfully.

  3 but when I recorded this XML file in the generated table there me gives error

  As:

  INSERT INTO XMLTABLE

  VALUES

  (XMLTYPE (bfilename('MYDIR','testabc.xml'), NLS_CHARSET_ID ('AL32UTF8')))

  Error report:

  SQL error: ORA-31061: error XDB: XML error event

  ORA-19202: an error has occurred in the processing of XML

  LSX-00333: literal '94032000' is not valid with regard to the model

  And I have to store this xml in tables of this so what I have to do?

  Thanks for your reply odie_63.

  I got this my solution for the error. My XML document is not well structured based on my registered XML schema.

  Average in My XML Document is an invalid value and which do not match my schema model so it gives this error

  SQL error: ORA-31061: error XDB: XML error event

  ORA-19202: an error has occurred in the processing of XML

  LSX-00333: literal '94032000' is not valid with regard to the model

  For the Solution, we have two ways

  1. I changed this literal value "94032000" in my xml file, then save it.

  2.

  -To delete this schema can

  -We need to change the schema for the particular element model

  like: -.

  -then to store xml in the database, it works...

  Thank you.

• Select Into statement in the function db - query issued schema table

  problem with "select into" in the function db to point 10.2
  
  
  There are two schemas. "mdbdev" is the master database, and 'devusr' is granted SELECT access table to run queries in the mdbdev schema.
  
  
  with devusr, in SQL, I am able to run the following query
  
  Select wm_concat (strConcatedCountryList)
  from (select country_name as mdbdev.country_master mdbcm strConcatedCountryList
  where mdbcm.country_ship_status = < param? >
  order of country_name)
  
  
  
  but when I use the same procedure/function with 'select into' motion, failed to compile with error * "table or view does not exist."
  
  
  FUNCTION GETCOUNTRYLISTTOSHIP (SHIP_STATUS NUMBER)
  RETURN VARCHAR2
  IS
  var2CountryList VARCHAR2 (1000);
  BEGIN
  Select wm_concat INTO var2CountryList (strConcatedCountryList)
  from (select country_name as mdbdev.country_master mdbcm strConcatedCountryList
  where mdbcm.country_ship_status = value < SHIP_STATUS >
  order of country_name);
  Return var2CountryList;
  END;
  
  
  Please advise/help/suggestion :)

  You don't have to ask for the DBA, you can run a query to find out:

  select *
  from  all_tab_privs_recd
  where owner = 'MDBDEV'
  and table_name = 'COUNTRY_MASTER'
  

  What give you?

• Issue TOC which merged FlashHelp projects

  I was delighted to discover this morning that I can now merge FlashHelp projects!
  
  I'm running into a problem with my OCD, however. He does not appear. I made sure my child TOCs have projects, and they do. But the parent TOC is stubborn. Section content is there - but is listed.
  
  Also, after reading the help files with HR, they suggested that draft edition in a central location - which I tried, but it did not work. It's supposed to be for WebHelp or what I need to do for FlashHelp, too?
  
  It's my first time trying this, so I'm probably something wrong - maybe one of you pro can help?
  
  Thank you!
  Crystal

  Hi Crystal

  Then you run FlashHelp Pro ouptut and publishing in the RoboEngine? If this isn't the case, I don't think that you are able to merge generic FlashHelp you can with ordinary WebHelp.

  See you soon... Rick

• Issue of table 2D

  Hello!

  I have two 1 d arrey for example: 1 2 3 4 5 and 6 7 8 9 10.

  I wan't an arrey 2D or matrix that looks like:

  

  No idea how to do it?

  Thanks: Kolos

  How to tell you that you are faster than me.

• Why split cells in a table to work but merge cells is not yet highlighted in my choices

  alter - table - cell splitting works very well. I can select a line of cells and try to change merger - table - but the choice of the merger is not yet highlighted

  To modify > table > merge cells to work, many cells had to be selected. If you use Dreamweaver CC in Live View mode, a single element can be selected simultaneously. Therefore, merge cells is disabled. Merge the cells will also be disabled if you select a table row, because the cells inside the line that should be chosen, not the line itself.

  Switch to Design view to merge cells.

• rowSetIterator.getRow (key) is null first time click ADF table row

  Hello experts, I have very strange problem in ADF table with multiple selection mode. First time when I select a folder and a command button press to treat the selected query, rowSetIterator.getRow (key) throws null pointer exception.   Second time click on any record command button and hit it again, rowSetIterator.getRow (key) does not throw an error it gives me rather recording.  Here is my code:

  < af:table value = "#{bindings.paymentList.collectionModel}" var = 'row' "

  Rows = "#{Bindings.paymentList.rangeSize} '"

  emptyText = "#{bindings.paymentList.viewable?" "{"No request found.":"Access Denied."}"

  columnStretching = "column: c8" width = "860px";

  fetchSize = "#{bindings.paymentList.rangeSize} '"

  disableColumnReordering = "true" rowBandingInterval = "1".

  inlineStyle = ' height: 400px; "

  filterModel = "#{bindings.paymentListQuery.queryDescriptor} '"

  queryListener = "#{bindings.paymentListQuery.processQuery} '"

  filterVisible = "true" varStatus = "vs."

  selectionListener = "#{viewScope.myBean.currentSelectionListener} '"

  rowSelection = "multiple".

  ID = "t1".

  Binding = "#{viewScope.myBean.MyTable}" >

  < af:column... >

  .....

  < / af:table >

  < af:commandButton text = "ProcessRequest".

  ID = "cbProcReq".

  Binding = "#{viewScope.myBean.processReqCB} '"

  action = "#{viewScope.myBean.processRequests}" > "

  < / af:commandButton >

  currentSelectionListener():

  
  

  rksSelectedRows = searchResultTable.getSelectedRowKeys ();

  If (rksSelectedRows! = null & &! rksSelectedRows.isEmpty ()) {}

  System.out.println ("rksSelectedRows is not null or empty");   / / always runs

  }

  }

  processRequests():

  RowKeySet rksSelectedRows = myTable.getSelectedRowKeys ();

  If (null! = rksSelectedRows & &! rksSelectedRows.isEmpty ()) {}

  Iterator itrSelectedRows = rksSelectedRows.iterator ();

  RowSetIterator rowSetIterator = dcItteratorBindings.getRowSetIterator ();

  While (itrSelectedRows.hasNext ()) {}

  Key = (Key) ((List) itrSelectedRows.next () .get (0);

  If (null! = rowSetIterator.getRow (key)) {//works only 2nd time click.}  First, click on throw null for getRow()

  PaymentReq paymentReq = (PaymentReq) ((DCDataRow) rowSetIterator.getRow (key)) .getDataProvider ();

  reqList.add (paymentReq);

  } else {}

  System.out.println ("getRow() is null");

  }

  }

  I noticed that the key is never null.  Something is still getting filled.    No idea why this glitch.  Why always 2nd time click work?

  I also checked thatRow myRow = rsiSelectedRows.getRow(key); is showing  myRow as null  for the first time. But  2nd time when I click and hit button,  myRow is not null !!  Do not know what is this glitch.

  


  Appreciate your help.

  Thank you

  Finally I was able to solve the problem.   Noticed that code clear filter in backing bean caused this problem.   I am clear the filter of bean support when the user forgets to clear the filter in the user interface and that caused the issue with table selection.  I commented on this code and table selection works perfectly well.

• Merge Partition - Space Question

  We have a large table in 10g which has been partitioned from list. As the time has passed data with a valid value is not in any of the lists of the partitions has been inserted several times. These data fall into the default partition

  So we have something like this:

  Table ERRORS

  Partition E_1 values ('A', 'B', 'C')

  Partition E_2 values ('L', ', 'n')-size 600G

  Partition by default E_DEFAULT (but contains data of a single value 'Z') - size 50 G

  Now the seller would like to fix this by adding the values of 'Z' to E_2.

  They offer the following:

  ALTER table split partition (partition E_TEMP, E_DEFAULT) E_DEFAULT ERRORS;

  ALTER table merge E_TEMP, E_2 partition in partition E_2 ERRORS.

  I'm fine with the strategy. I have no doubt that it will work.

  I'm afraid that because the size of the partition is so great the merger will require a 650G extra free in the tablespace. Sellers seem to think that it will just add the 50G to 600G.

  Looking at the documentation, the merge partition section shows:

  "Use the ALTER TABLE ... M ERGE PARTITION statement allows you to merge the contents of two partitions into a single partition. "The two original partitions are deleted, as are all the correspondents index."

  This means to me that it takes two and creates a third, thus requiring the 650G of extra free space.

  But is this always the case if the third partition is actually one of the two being merged?

  For what it's worth, my plan was:

  Failure to Split

  Change the new partition with an empty temp table

  remove the new partition

  Edit E_2 to add the new value

  Insert ERROR select * from temporary table.

  drop temporary table

  I think that this requires free space of 50G.

  Thank you

  My main question, however, and this that I can't test (or do not know how to test) is the solution of partition of merger proposed by the seller requires free space equal to two partitions (in this case 650G) original to work? The seller says no. I think, but can not find documentation or evidence, Yes.

  If the seller says no, ask them for proof. I'm not aware that the internal process has been documented. But you should be able to test quite easily.

  The only reason why a new segment will be created being is if the data would actually be moved. In order to test whether the data is transferred.

  If the data is not moved, it's the same segment as before.

  1 put a line in P1 - examine the IDENTIFIER line

  2 put a line in P2 - examine the IDENTIFIER line

  3 MERGE P2 P1

  4. determine if the data transferred - what ROWID changed?

  The ID will be different if the data has been moved to a new segment.

  create table part_list (State varchar2 (2))
  list partition (State)
  (values of partition p_ca ('CA'),
  values of partition p_wa ('WA'),
  values (default) partition p_default
  );

  insert into part_list values ('CA');

  insert into part_list values ('WA');

  insert into part_list values ("NV");

  Select a State, rowid RID, DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO (ROWID) fno,

  DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER (ROWID) blkno,

  DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_ROW_NUMBER (ROWID) rowno

  of part_list

  STATE, RID, FNO, BLKNO, ROWNO

  CA, AAAV71AAEAAAAs0AAA, 4, 2868, 0

  WA, AAAV72AAEAAAAtEAAA, 4, 2884, 0

  NV, AAAV73AAEAAAAtcAAA, 4, 2908, 0

  ALTER table merge partitions p_ca, p_wa part_list in the p_ca partition

  Select a State, rowid RID, DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO (ROWID) fno,

  DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER (ROWID) blkno,

  DBMS_ROWID. ROWID_ROW_NUMBER (ROWID) rowno

  of part_list

  STATE, RID, FNO, BLKNO, ROWNO

  CA, AAAV74AAEAAAAtjAAA, 4, 2915, 0

  WA, AAAV74AAEAAAAtjAAB, 4, 2915, 1

  NV, AAAV73AAEAAAAtcAAA, 4, 2908, 0

  Note that the ROWID for 'CA' and 'WA' values are different. This means that the lines have been moved. The file number is the same, but the block numbers have changed as to have the line number for 'WA '.

  The fact that existing lines have been moved at all should answer your question about what really makes Oracle. In other words, is NOT just to add the 'WA' line for the existing partitions.

  If you do a SPLIT, but the data of the existing partitions is NOT affected, no data movement is performed. Check this example and see that all existing ROWID components remain the same

  ALTER table part_list split partition p_default ('OR') values

  in (p_or partition, partition p_default)

  He has not given "GOLD" in the partition by default so that Oracle has simply ignored this segment and created a new one for the new partition.

• RICs when MergeTable using with the names of multiple tables

  Hello world!

  I just saw, as v11 OWM MergeTable media with the names of multiple tables. As I couldn't find anything in the documentation, here's a question:

  It also means, that RICs are automatically taken into account regarding the order of INSERTS/CHANGES/DELETES?

  That would actually really great and simplify the merge of our application mechanism a lot.

  Kind regards

  Andreas

  Hi Andreas,

  This feature works the same MergeWorkspace, but with a smaller set of tables.  Tables will always be merged into the order of the child table first, then the parent tables.  However, foreign key constraints are not validated until all tables have been merged.  This would prevent a mistake to be triggered when the child table merging before the parent merging table data in the parent workspace.

  Kind regards

  Ben