kb2656351 and kb2487367 offer permanently for update

Similar Questions

• Keep installation of updates KB2656351 and KB2487367

  Win XP. NetFramework 2.0 Service Pack. NetFramework 3.0 Service Pack 2. NetFramework 3.5 SPI. NetFramework 4 Client Profile. NetFramework expanded 4.
  KB2656351 and KB2487367 - updates both updated several times and so did during these last months.
  According to the Microsoft Update site, in ' review your update history, he said: the two files were, indeed, properly installed, but if I update over there, or through "automatic updates", the same two files install repeatedly.»
  I can't help but feel that because I'm not able to go beyond these two files, I get no other, more recent updates, someone suggested to me could well be the cause of my internet speed more and more slow.
  The link to the .NET FRAMEWORK 4 installation of fails with the error "failed generic Trust ' 0x800b010e was not at all helpful.
  I missed one. NetFramework file, or is there actually a problem that is not adequately covered?

  Hello

  This happens if .net Framework components are corrupted you need to repair .net Framework components and check
  Reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976982 for detailed steps:

  Follow these steps:

  Step 1: To repair the .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, 4, you must uninstall several versions of the .NET Framework using the .NET Framework Cleanup tool, and then reinstall the components.

  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/08/28/8904493.aspx

  
  Step 2: Now, reinstall components one by one.

  .NET framework 1.1 ( http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=262d25e3-f589-4842-8157-034d1e7cf3a3)

  .NET framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 (SP1) (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A8F5654F-088E-40B2-BBDB-A83353618B38)

  .NET framework 3.5 SP1 (this will also install the .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and the .NET Framework 3.0 SP2) http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=22

   

  Step 3: Now, try to install the updates manually.

  Update of security for Microsoft .NET Framework 4
  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=28570

  Update of security for Microsoft .NET Framework 4

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?displaylang=en&ID=27050

• KB2656351 and KB2487367

  I get one to not update KB2656351 and KB2487367 with 0Ko again and again every time I'm staying on.

  Hello

  Method 1:

  If you get updates several times, I suggest you to follow these steps and try to hide the updates:

  a. click Start.

  b. click Control Panel.

  c. click on Windows update.

  d. After Windows updates or you are looking for updates, click on the link updates is available .

  e. right click on an update list that you want to hide, and then click hide update.

  If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password, or click continue.

  f. check if the problem persists.

  Method 2:

  You can also check out the link with the similar issue and a possible solution:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_xp-windows_update/kb2656351-and-kb2487367-continously-offer-for/c76ea934-9E81-450D-869c-16b937ad46e3

  Let us know if it helps.

• Change in the merger of insert and create a procedure for updating the records after

  Hello
  
  I have a table that contains about 50 M lines of partition, and every day I have an application that performs a merge to insert records statement about 100 k per day and it's 300 M updates a day.
  
  Because I both update and insert the application performs a merge.
  I need to make at least 500 M, updated day by day, and for this reason this solution doesn't have enough performance for what I'm asking.
  
  I think another solution that I will try to implement now, and I just posted this in an attempt to get help on the option that I may have to do.
  
  I want to start putting in place:
  -Locations is updated 'last_record_date' using 'KEY1' and 'Key2' "KEY3";
  -Change the application to only inserts into a temporary table.
  -Have two procedures, one that takes the new records from the temporary table and inserts it into the final table, and another that selects records which is updated and perform an update.
  -This two procedures will choose the records and delete them from the temporary table (or mark them as updated\inserted).
  
  The volume is very large, so performance is a challenge! That's why I'm writing this, because a solution with enough performance for the intermediate stage will be difficult.
  My final table is partitioned by date and the date is the area that I need to update (instead of create daily partitions in order to reduce the frequency of the movement of the line, I create monthly partitions)!
  It is currently my table definition:

  CREATE TABLE MY_TEST_TABLE
      (KEY1                           VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) ,
      KEY2                         VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) NOT NULL,
      KEY3                           VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) ,
      last_record_date                    VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) NOT NULL)
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    1
    MAXTRANS    255
     STORAGE   (
      BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
    )
    NOCACHE
    MONITORING
    ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT
    PARTITION BY RANGE (last_record_date)
    (
    PARTITION MY_TEST_TABLE_201112 VALUES LESS THAN ('20120101')
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    1
    MAXTRANS    255
    NOLOGGING,
    PARTITION MY_TEST_TABLE_201201 VALUES LESS THAN ('20120201')
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    1
    MAXTRANS    255
    NOLOGGING,
    PARTITION MY_TEST_TABLE_201202 VALUES LESS THAN ('20120301')
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    1
    MAXTRANS    255
    NOLOGGING,
    PARTITION def VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    1
    MAXTRANS    255
    NOLOGGING
    )
    NOPARALLEL
  /
  
  
  
  -- Constraints for MY_TEST_TABLE
  
  ALTER TABLE MY_TEST_TABLE
  ADD CHECK ("KEY1" IS NOT NULL)
  /
  
  ALTER TABLE MY_TEST_TABLE
  ADD CHECK ("KEY2" IS NOT NULL)
  /
  
  ALTER TABLE MY_TEST_TABLE
  ADD CHECK ("KEY3" IS NOT NULL)
  /
  ALTER TABLE MY_TEST_TABLE
  ADD CONSTRAINT pk_MY_TEST_TABLE PRIMARY KEY (KEY1, KEY2, KEY3)
  USING INDEX
    PCTFREE     10
    INITRANS    2
    MAXTRANS    255
  /

  Thank you
  Ricardo Tomas

  naoseionome wrote:
  Hello

  My version is:
  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production

  It's the DOF I used to create the database.

  The merger is common during every day for about 10 M records.

  There are several methods to do the update, but they do sequencially to avoid deadlocks (because I can't control the source and each process can update the same keys.

  The update uses "KEY1, KEY2, KEY3" to update the value 'LAST_RECORD_DATE' have impact by being date or varchar2?

  I'm still waiting to receive permissions in order to follow up the matter, but in the meantime, in that I am trying to implement this work around in order to accelerate a development in the case where it would be necessary! Comments only I have at the moment, it is that he is not able to process the total amount of records timely (order book is generated).

  Thank you
  Ricardo

  Well, the first thing we do is to change the type of data type varchar to a date. The main impact is that a date is not a string, it's a date. If you are adding data processes in different date formats (which is possible when you use a character to store information) you're going to be very sad (good luck converting back an effective date).

  An example of how this can happen easily.

  ME_TUBBZ?select to_char(sysdate) from dual;
  
  TO_CHAR(SYSDATE)
  -----------------------------
  12-jan-2012 10 55:33
  
  1 row selected.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
  ME_TUBBZ?alter session set nls_date_format = 'yyyy-mon-dd';
  
  Session altered.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
  ME_TUBBZ?select to_char(sysdate) from dual;
  
  TO_CHAR(SYSDATE)
  --------------------
  2012-jan-12
  
  1 row selected.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
  

  Assuming that the client passes the column as an Oracle DATE will make an (implicit) conversion to store the data as a string, which will be based on the current settings of the NLS for the session. This allows also for someone to completely non-jour the information in the column (super bad). It's just really bad form to use strings to store dates, numbers, anything that is not naturally a string.

  Based on the description of your problem, I can't imagine how your partitioning scheme performs one action in another that require more work in order to process the updates (which are most of your needs). Partitioning does not equate to increase performance. It is a tool that, like every tool has its place, but I do not think that this is justified for what you do (certainly not how you currently use it anyway).

  I say no partitioning can not be useful for you, but I don't think that on the column that you are currently using is 'good '.

  Something I would like to personally study (must be able to compare this approach to your course, if you need parameters for comparison) if I were you would be using a Table Index organized for it. It will take more time to perform the operations insertion, but that is a small part of all the work that you do for this process. For updates, it should eliminate a lot of IO, assuming that you are doing an INDEX seek followed by a table access by ROWID to perform updates. This recommendation assumes that everything you said is true. You have 4 columns in your table, of which 3 are components of the primary key and the 4th is a date (note I did not string :)) and that you refresh mainly, not fit.) Also that you have no 'secondary' on this entity index (and none are needed).

  I would investigate this approach before the solution of temporary table that you are currently studying.

  See you soon,.

• offer repeated for update

  Original title: kb2289162 update failed

  downloaded and continues to try to install it

  Hi jeff.barnes70,

  What status appear in the historical versions:

  a. Click Start, in the search box, type in update

  b. click on windows Update

  c. click view update history

  Follow the steps of it below the link which has some steps on how to troubleshoot Windows Update or Microsoft Update when you are repeatedly offered an update: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910339

  You can download the standalone product of the KB from the link below:http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=724d0ad6-ba5f-4dbf-b280-3fb36335d33b&displaylang=en

  With regard to:

  Samhrutha G S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Acrobat 8 Pro ' Check for Updates ' does not not (Windows 7, 64-bit)

  I have Acrobat 8 Pro installed on my Windows 7 (64 bit) system; specifically v8.1.3. When you try to use the feature of ' Check for Updates ' application, Adobe Updater displays the following message: "no Internet connection found.  Please check your Internet settings or firewall. »

  I do not encounter this error if you use the "Update" functionality with other applications such as Photoshop Adobe elements & Reader.  I have an internet connection.

  I installed on my laptop Vista Acrobat 8 Pro and the feature "Check for Updates" works as expected.

  All the words of wisdom on why I encounter this problem on my Windows 7 system and/or how to fix it?  Thanks in advance.

  Problem has been resolved (the solution in a post on the forum of the Adobe Web site):

  CONTROL PANEL > NETWORK CONNECTIONS >

  Windows "gave me" a "Wireless Network Connection 3" that has been identified as a "Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport Adapter"

  I clicked it and chose to "disable."

  Once the 'virtual' card has been deactivated, my Adobe Acrobat Update Manager launch worked well.  I've seen this problem on Windows 7; never lived with my XP or Vista systems.

• Select cursor for update: multiple columns of different tables

  Hello
  
  I have two tables test1 and test2. I want to udpate the column (DEPT_DSCR) from the TEST1 and TEST2 using select for update and current tables of the... with the cursor.
  
  I have a code drafted as follows:
  DECLARE
  v_mydept1 TEST1. TYPE % DEPT_CD;
  v_mydept2 TEST2. TYPE % DEPT_CD;
  CURSOR C1 IS SELECT TEST1. DEPT_CD, TEST2. DEPT_CD OF TEST1, TEST2 WHERE TEST1. DEPT_CD = TEST2. DEPT_CD AND TEST1. DEPT_CD IS 'AA' FOR THE UPDATE OF TEST1. DEPT_DSCR, TEST2. DEPT_DSCR;
  BEGIN
  OPEN C1;
  LOOP
  FETCH C1 INTO v_mydept1, v_mydept2;
  WHEN EXIT C1% NOTFOUND;
  UPDATE TEST1 SET DEPT_DSCR IS "PLSQL1" WHERE CURRENT OF C1;.
  SETTING A DAY TEST2 SET DEPT_DSCR = 'PLSQL2' WHERE CURRENT OF C1.
  END LOOP;
  COMMIT;
  END;
  
  The code above when it is run, declares that it runs successfully. But it does not update the columns you want [DEPT_DSCR].
  
  It works only when we want to update one or more columns of the same table... i. e by providing these columns after ' to UPDATE THE.
  I don't know what exactly is the problem when you want to update several columns of different tables.
  
  Can someone help me on this?

  user12944938 wrote:
  But it's more the notion of compensation and understanding.

  See the link below:
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B10501_01/AppDev.920/a97269/pc_06sql.htm

  See the section RESTRICTION in the link above.

  Twinkle

• Update Windows to ask me to update the files that I had already downloaded and installed successfully, KB2600217, KB2533523, KB2487367, KB2656351 and KB2468871

  Please help me I'm really at a loss... This is the 6th time I try to reinstall the files again. I tried to use the fix microsoft tool, but it does not at all help to 2 times.

  Now I really need help 7th time asking me again to install the following updates:

  1) update for Microsoft .NET Framework 4 on XP, Server 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Server 2008 x 86 (KB2600217)

  Download size: 17.0 MB

  (2) update for MICROSOFT.NET Framework 4 on Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 x 86 (KB2533523)

  Download size: 19.4 MB

  (3) update for MICROSOFT.NET Framework 4 on Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 x 86 (KB2468871)

  Download size: 18.9 MB

  4) update for Microsoft .NET Framework 4 on XP, Server 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Server 2008 x 86 (KB2656351)

  Download size: 5.4 MB

  (5) security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 4 on Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 x 86 (KB2487367)

  Download size: 2.1 MB

  Please help thanks :)

  Concerning

  In many cases repair .NET Framework 4 is sufficient to fix the corruption, but in some cases, need to uninstall and reinstall .NET Framework 4.

  Windows 7 and Windows Vista users follow these steps to repair the installation of .NET Framework 4:

  1. Close all running applications.
  2. Click Start, type Uninstall in the Start Search box, and then click uninstall a program.
  3. Double-click Microsoft .NET Framework 4 Client Profile.
  4. Select repair .NET Framework 4 Client Profile to its original state , and then click Next.
  5. Repairs completed, click Finish.
  6. Click restart now to restart your computer.
  7. Install the latest Windows updates by clicking the Start button, type Windows Update in the Search box, and then click on Windows Update.

  Ref: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976982

  If the repair fails, you need to reinstall .NET Framework 4

  Click on the following link to download the .NET Framework cleanup tool:

  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/08/28/8904493.aspx
  Downloads for framework if necessary:
  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa569263.aspx

• Is - is no longer offers a basic remuneration for it and it's yours for as long as you want with no updates of Adobe?  All programs are now a subscription?  Is it really not possible more to pay only once and that the program without updates until what yo

  Is - is no longer offers a basic remuneration for it and it's yours for as long as you want with no updates of Adobe?  All programs are now a subscription?  Is it really not possible more to pay only once and the program without updates until you decide to improve?

  You can buy cs6, Creative Suite 6

• I have Firefox 8.0.1 and since the update to it, some sites, I need to go so that Firefox will not accept certificates which is accepted in the previous version. I can not get the permanent exception and must uncheck permanent and do every time.

  I have Firefox 8.0.1 and since the update to it, some sites, I need to go so that Firefox will not accept certificates which is accepted in the previous version. I can not get the permanent exception and must uncheck permanent

  You can use this button to go to the Firefox profile folder:

  • Help > troubleshooting information > profile directory: opens showing the file

  It is not usually necessary to create an exception for the certificates.
  
  Possible causes are that a server does not send the full (intermediate) certificate chain or self signed certificates.

• Version 3.6.23 and page tells me to update, but clicking the link provides no update options and ' check for updates ' tells me there is none

  This is the link that is provided on the help page:

  ATTENTION: Is maintained only Firefox 3.6 with security and updates of stability for a short period of time. Please upgrade to the latest version of Firefox.

  It's page, need me to, and I can't find information about how upgrade to one later version other than "check for updates" in the menu options, which does not (I'm told that there is none and that Firefox will periodically check the updates)

  http://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/updating%20firefox

  The current plan is to start offering updates of Firefox 7 for current users of Firefox 3.6 within this week. For now, just 3.6 users get updates minor 3.6.x. If you want to install the latest version now, you can simply download and install from Mozilla.com.

• KB976569 offered via windows update again and again, properly installed

  Hello

  I have XP Home Edition SP3.  I installed this update several times, but he continues to appear in my list of updates on the site of Microsoft Updates of the software to install.  Whenever it says the installation was successful.

  It appears in Add/Remove programs as if it has been installed, so why is this update continuously displayed in the list of updates must be installed on the Windows Update site?

  Any suggestions or explanations would be appreciated. Eric

  What is KB976569 listed in Add/Remove Programs [Yes/No]
  
  Yes

  Automatic updates (or the Windows Update Web site) still offers KB976569? [Yes/No]
  
  Yes

  The following may solve the behavior:

  1. stop the automatic updates service:

  Start > run > services.msc (enter) > [OK]
  Double-click Automatic Updates > click Stop
  (Stopping the service will take a moment)

  2 remove the contents of the download folder:

  Start > run > %windir%\SoftwareDistribution (enter) > [OK]
  Open the download folder and delete its contents
  Close the window.

  3. go to the Windows Update Web site. Select CUSTOM and allow the analysis to be performed. Uncheck/unselect KB976569 and hide ("don't show me this update").

  4. start the automatic updates service:

  Start > run > services.msc (enter) > [OK]
  Double-click Automatic Updates > click Start
  (Starting the service will take a moment)

  NB: If you are running a manual check for updates at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com, you will see a prompt saying: 'you have hidden a significant update. You want to install it now? "Answer NO to this prompt.

  ~ Robear Dyer (PA Bear) ~ MS MVP (that is to say, mail, security, Windows & Update Services) since 2002 ~ WARNING: MS MVPs represent or work for Microsoft

• Service pack guard repeatedly offered on windows update, cannot install Service pack 2 and Internet explorer 9

  Original title: the Service Pack is installed a number of times.

  There are already five heads of the installation. He keeps on reappearing as an update of Windows Vista! What kind of error is it? It TI a malware? I can't install antivirus from other anti - virus vendors products. In this case I can not install Service pack 2 and internet Explorer 9, too. Please allows us to make a way to solve this problem.

  Hello

  
  1. is the Service pack 1 is already installed on your computer?
  2. what version of service pack offers you to install?
  3. do you get an error message?
  4 are. which antivirus products you referring?
  5. have you made changes on the computer before this problem?
  Method 1:
  You can run the fix - it from the following link.
  The problem with Microsoft Windows Update is not working
  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/windows_update/
  Method 2:
  You can perform a clean boot, and then try to install the updates. Read the following article.
  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
  Note: once you are done with the boot, please follow step 7 of article to reset your computer to normal startup.
  
  Method 3:
  Reset Windows update components, and then check if it helps.
  How to reset the Windows Update components?
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/971058
  Note: this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base. How to back up and restore the registry in Windows:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/back-up-the-registry
  Method 4:
  You can try the procedure described in the supplied knowledge base article and check.
  Cannot install updates in Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2509997
  Note: this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base. How to back up and restore the registry in Windows:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/back-up-the-registry
  Warning of CHKDSK
  Important: when running chkdsk on the drive hard if bad sectors are found on the disk hard when chkdsk attempts to repair this area if all available on which data may be lost.
  Note: make sure that you back up the data before proceeding with the disk check.
  See also:
  
  Solve common installation issues in Windows Update, Microsoft Update and Windows Server Update Services
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/906602

• How to get rid of the old and always offered updates - Vista

  Hello, I have Vista and it offers me a very old version of the updates to be updated and for this reason I can't get/retired new updates... Update window keeps on telling me that I have 165 updates to be downloaded and installed... It happened after re-installing the operating system as 4months ago and even after the automatic updates when I changed the settings to ask me before auto update... So I tried to make them hidden, but after each reboot, Vista offers me the same old * I don't want to have on my computer because after a re-installation of the wi - fi stopped working and I had to download the new drivers on the computer of my gf. Does anyone know how to get rid of them? Where a list or scheduled updates are stored? Thank you very much, I like Vista. He brought me only good times with my computer. Tomas

  Hello

  Follow these steps and check if that helps.

  Step 1:

  I suggest you to reset the updated Windows components and check if that helps.

  Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

  322756 how to back up and restore the registry in Windows

  Step 2:
  Problems with the installation of the updates.

• If I create a website for a client, it will be able to update certain content using another tool for Adobe (it won't use (and buy) DW just few updates)?

  If I create a website for a client, it will be able to update certain content using another tool for Adobe (it won't use (and buy) DW just few updates)?

  Why not contribute? Always sold, my clients love it. Each of them made. They all hate wordpress and Joomla, and when they try to contribute, they all thank me. I don't even have to teach them how to use it.  But if they do not spend a penny on any software, then you're kind of stuck.

  There is a CMS for Dreamweaver by Studio extend I think. I bought it, and it is not very good in my opinion. It is not integrated in the system uses DW model, then you will need to open each page and select a div at a time to make editable manually. Could be so much more. I think it's a domain Adobe completely blew with DW.  Absolutely, there should be an integrated way in order to offer a type CMS without Contribute workflow. Having to use WordPress is not something that I like. Most of my clients is a small business and need one, maybe 2 people to make fundamental changes to their pages. Built in CMS would be perfect. I continue to use DW to build sites, and I could let minor things without a disbursement of $200 for the customer.