KB979909, KB982168, KB2604092, KB2656407, KB2656352, KB2656369 are all offered on several occasions

Similar Questions

• Updates security offered at several occasions. - KB2604092 & KB2636927

  Original title: Windows security updates (* adds the title KB)

  In my history of update, it shows two updates have been installed successfully several times. They are:

  Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB2604092), and
  Update of security for Microsoft Silverlight (KB2636927)
   
  But whenever I start my computer, the yellow shield appears and indicates that these updates are still required. When I turn off my computer, it installs them again.
   
  I don't know if in fact they were not installed but just to show that they have been installed in the history, or if they were really installed and for some reason any somewhere in the system, it is not this.
   
  Would appreciate any help I could get.
  Hello
   
  I suggest you to refer to the following Microsoft article and check if it helps.
   
  Troubleshooting Windows Update or Microsoft Update when you are repeatedly offered an update:
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/910339
  Important: This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
   
  How to back up and restore the registry in Windows
   http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/322756
   
   

• KB2604092 KB2656352 KB2656369 KB2686828 KB2604110 and KB2656407 are still they need install

  ORIGINAL TITLE: Windows Update problem

  My laptop that is running Windows XP keeps repeating the need to download and install Net Framework security the following dates KB2604092 KB2656352 KB2656369 KB2686828 KB2604110 and KB2656407. 20 attempts later and they still see that I need to install even if they would supposedly downloaded ok. How can I solve this?

  Woozle,

  See the article after some troubleshooting for your question:

  Windows Update or Microsoft Update repeatedly offers the same update

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/910339/en-us >

  Please let us know if it did or did not help to solve your problem.

  UTC/GMT is 21:49 on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

• KB2656352, KB2656369 and KB2604092 redetecting updates and reinstall.

  Updates Microsoft, KB2656352, KB2656369 and KB2604092 redetecting and reinstall.  I get no error.  He says that the installation was successful each time. But these same 3 updates keep reports as needed.  I'm having this problem on 3 PCs (XP sp3) and on a single server (Server 2003).

  Two of these updates are from earlier dates, but this problem started when Microsoft released updates for the month of may 2012.

  3 updates all involve them dot net.  (details below):

  Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB2604092)
  Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB2656369)
  Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB2656352)

  I tried to uninstall dot net 3.5 and 3.0 (2.0 wouldn't let me uninstall it).  After you have reinstalled 3.0 and 3.5, these same updates are still needed.  I'm stuck in an endless loop...

  I think I finally solved this problem.

  First, I downloaded the dotnetfx_cleanup_tool.  When I ran, he gave me a choice as to what version of .NET I wanted to clean up.  I chose "All Versions of the .NET Framework".  It ran for about 10 minutes.

  Once it was finished, I looked in Add/Remove Programs, and all versions of .NET have now been uninstalled and is no longer.

  Then, I downloaded the full version of .NET 3.5 SP1 from Microsoft.  I ran the program (which takes about 15 minutes).  Once completed, I noticed that it had installed .NET 2.0, 3.0 and 3.5.

  Then I went on the site of Microsoft Updates and of course, I needed many updates to .NET.  But this time after you download and install, my machine 100% full with no other updates required reports.

• XP - offered continuously updates (KB974417, KB979909, KB982168)

  I hijacked this title because I seem to have a similar problem as the author is, except for the part of NERO.

  I uninstalled 2 of them using Control Panel, but the third was not found. Then, I downloaded the KB and tried to install mode without failure. Well, of course, this must have been wandering like all 3 the same mistake gave advice. something about the installer having ongoing not to run or you're in Mode safe... Duh :) I rebooted and install from the desktop, but still have the same question... updated guard offering all three.

  Any idea on how to solve this problem?

  I would also like to say that I had no problem until I installed NERO multimedia Suite 10... perhaps I should address it with them. Installation didn't complete the first two times I tried, the two default while preinstalling 9 necessary Microsoft points. He has not always 8 (Microsoft VS PIA Redist) the final error pops up on the screen was "Installation of the failed installation of Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 KB967328 program will leave." My choices were YES & NO; On the first try, I chose the second YES, I chose No. (having a choice seems to make little sense)

  After the attempt with the Safe Mode method and apparently successfully manual installed, NERO completed without error, but an inspection with the Belarc Advisor (update), I see that KB967328 isn't here and do not complain. Also 3 in the title of this post, only KB974417, KB979909 appear as 'not installed' and don't complain KB982168 either. .... I get always the three updates offered repeatedly.

  Thank you for your advice,

  Chris

  I was getting exactly the same problem, and what I've discovered, is that Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 KB967328 causes effectively corruption in the .NET Framework which translates KB974417, KB979909, KB982168 to be offered several times. Here is an answer I've included in another article:

  Tire of error: resource is not available (cannot install KB967328):

  For me, this corruption cannot simply fixed by removing the .NET Framework and put it back, because I install this program on 400 computers + to my company. There is no way I'm going to go visit each machine. So I had know what was corrupting the .NET Framework in the first place rather than fix once it was broken. After hours of work of this problem, here's what I discovered:

  KB967328 does not fail because there is a corruption in the .NET Framework, KB967328 CAUSES THE CORRUPTION! I tested a dozen times, the .NET Framework works very well... install KB967328, now the .NET Framework is corrupt. To be fair, it's more of a Microsoft problem and a problem of Nero. Only, it seems to be a problem with Nero because this is an unsupported patch that Nero can demand.

  So here's what I discovered. If you read the details on this fix KB967328 is no, you will see that all this is make updates a file called Presentationframework.dll to version 3.0.6920.4000. But it is a unsupported patch (which means you need to do a special request for double you send the file). We are supposed to only install this if we really need. Otherwise, we're supposed to wait for the next service pack for this update. Nero must, of course, so we have to find a way to update this file without altering the .NET Framework in the process.

  So, I did a little research and discovered that KB977354 contains a number of updates, including an update of Presentationframework.dll version 3.0.6920.4016. So if you simply replace KB967328 by KB977354, you will update the file, you must meet the requirements of Nero without altering the .NET Framework in the process. (KB977354 is in fact included in a rollup of the .NET Framework update, so I actually ended up replacing KB967328 with KB982524 rollup instead). I even asked Nero support on this idea, and they confirmed that it is a viable alternative.

  So if someone tries to install Nero silently with an unattended Setup script, simply swapping KB967328 with KB977354 (or the update rollup KB982524) will save you a lot of headaches.

• kb983583, kb979909, kb982168 kb976569 PROBLEMS!

  First, a bit about my system: HP Pavilion ZV5000, Pentium IV laptop clocked at 2.8 GHz (non-mobile), 1.12 GB of RAM (actually a stick of 1 GB and a 256 MB key, but the internal video card uses 128 MB of that), running windows XP pro...

  It is a fairly new installation and I had no problems with it so far...

  Here's what happened... I tried to install Nero 10...  before installing it, it gave me a list of things that were to be installed before we could install Nero, whom he proceeds to try to... He gave me problems on some components .NET, saying that he was unable to continue... I tried to install it again once or twice and the same thing has happened, except that this .NET component was the only thing on the list... I decided I should check windows update out I installed everything and see if there was something to install... it was what he, with an update not install it (not!), an updated .NET... do not think much of it at the time, I have advanced and tried to install nero again, what worked... and for the record, nero works perfectly...

  so I decided to try to deal with this update failed, so I went back on the windows update site...  3 critical updates appeared (kb983583, kb979909, kb982168) and an option updated software (kb976569)... I checked all four and click on install... updates, for some reason, install them in the order opposite of appearance, with kb976569 trying to install everything first, which proves to be defective (loser!) and the other three install sucessfully (completed!)... then I went back to the selection of windows update page and the same four updates appear, as if the three who actually did work not worked after all...

  I copied my windowsupdate.log file and will try to post a reply on this subject, in the case where it is useful (I tried to include it in this post, but iexplorer crashed and I had to retype this... ugh!)

  any help would be appreciated...

  Chris

  Hi Zappazapper,

  Follow these steps in the order in and then try to install the updates.

  Step 1: Check the error code

  a. clickStart, click all programsand then click Windows Update or Microsoft Update.

  b. on the Windows Update Web site or on the Microsoft Update Web site, clickview update history. A window opens that displays the updates that have been installed or that have failed to install on the computer.

  (c) in theState of this window column, find the update failed to install and then click on the red X. A new window opens that displays the installation error code.

  Step 2

  Put your computer in a clean boot and then try to install the update.
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353 (step 1)
  NOTE: Turn on your computer to a normal startup by following the steps inHow to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state

  Step 3

  If the problem persists, download the update manually and install the update.
  http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=8b9e4bb3-5a33-443e-bb09-9f9e506db519

  If the update still does not work, try step 4.

  Step 4

  Reset windows update components.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/971058

  Bindu R - Microsoft technical support.
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Why are all the links on the site of sierra going to El Capitan information...

  Why are all the links on the site of sierra going to El Capitan information...

  What site? The Apple - http://www.apple.com/macos/sierra/ - one is connected to what you expect, as do the links on the page at the top of this thread.

• The addons on Firefox stopped, but they are all still turned on?

  After you restart Firefox multiple times, it seems that some addons that I activated have stopped working, I have to say that all the addons are always enabled, but have stopped working. They are all updated and so is Firefox, they were compatible before restart me Firefox. Does anyone have an idea of what is happening and how to fix it? Thank you!

  It is possible that there is a problem with the files that store the registry extensions.

  Delete the files (extensions.json, extensions.sqlite, extensions.ini) extensions.* and compatibility.ini in the profile folder of Firefox to reset the extensions registry.

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/profiles

  New files will be created if necessary.

  See "extension corrupted files:

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_install_themes_or_extensions
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/unable+to+install+add-ons

  If you see disabled extensions or is not compatible in "Firefox button/Tools menu > Modules > Extensions ' and then click the Tools button at the left end of the search bar to check if there is an update available compatibility.

  If that didn't help then remove addons.json and possibly prefs.js in the case where there is a problem with preferences.

• There are all sorts of symbols in the upper part of the screen on different things. (Delete, answer, answer all etc)

  Thunderbird didn't work at all the other day and I had to keep going in the Task Manager to shut it down, but then he began to work the next day and it works. However, there are all these symbols covering in the upper part of the screen.

  It seems that you have a mixture of two different languages.

  Close Thunderbird.

  Back up your profile folder.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Thunderbird

  Uninstall Thunderbird:
  Via 'Control Panel' or 'Settings' > 'programs and features '.
  Select Mozilla Thunderbird and click 'uninstall '.
  uninstall all instances of Mozilla Thunderbird.

  Download the language appropriate for your operating system from the link below and install it.

  • https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Thunderbird/all/

  Report on the results.

• When I put pictures on my Mac, I chose my Aperture library. Now there is no pictures in Photos or Aperture! They are all in the photo library, but I don't know why they are not in the pictures when I open it?

  When I put pictures on my Mac, I chose my Aperture library. Now there is no pictures in Photos or Aperture! They are all in the photo library, but I don't know why they are not in the pictures when I open it?

  Sorry try again - your post does not calculate

  They are all in the photo library, but I don't know why they are not in pictures

  What version of the operating system and Photos you have? Explain what exactly you're actually seeing and what has changed since it worked

  LN

• Where are all my iPhoto images?

  So I've recently updated my mac to El Capitan however was shocked to find when I open the new "Photos" App, it was empty and I couldn't open iPhoto as I need the most recent version that is not free and not available in the United Kingdom. Where are all the photos that I have uploaded to iPhoto missing and I can access it again?

  The Finder, choose utilities go to menu, open the Script Editor and run:

  the value the_string file (shell script 'by default read ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.iPhoto.plist RootDirectory') POSIX have thong

  If the_string begins by ": ~:" then set the_string to (path to the AsString home folder) & items 4 thru-1 of the_string

  Tell application "Finder" to reveal the point the_string

  This will select the library in the Finder. Run iPhoto Library upgrade on it or drag it to the Photos icon in the Dock as needed.

  (143439)

• all of a sudden all of the emails I received before 14:00 today are all the source code for the new ones nsince PAREN then are all readable ideas?

  all of a sudden all of the emails I received before 14:00 today are all code source hyperlink the nine since then are all readable ideas?

  Right-click on the folder, select Properties, and then choose the button repair.

  Long term solution is to not allow your anti virus scan profile of Thunderbird folders.

• I still use OS 10.6.8 now Safari, youtube, etc. are all about to stop working.

  I need to keep the old Appleworks on my computer, so I always use OS 10.6.8

  Now, Safari, youtube, etc. are all about to stop working.

  What can I do?

  Someone suggested there was a way to run two OS on the computer - is it possible?

  Help...

  < re-titled by host >

  10.6.8. move a partition and upgrade the original score to a new version of OS X that you Mac can operate.

  You can then boot from 10.6.8 use AppleWorks or most recent version to run the new version of the software when you need.

  The other alternative would be to do away with AppleWorks migrating to newer applications, so you can just launch the new version of Mac OS X.

  AppleWorks has been finally updated by Apple in 1995 and declared dead in 2007. It's really archaic code.

• Mini bookmark icons are all screwed up.

  Mini icons in my bookmarks list are all incorrect. They are either empty or belong to another link. I'm on FF28, but this has happened for quite awhile now. How to fix this?

  You can paste this code into the command line in the browser Console (Firefox/tools > Web Developer) to let all the favicons will expire.

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/Tools/Browser_Console

  var fS = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/browser/favicon-service;1"]
           .getService(Components.interfaces.nsIFaviconService);
  fS.expireAllFavicons();
  developer.mozilla.org/en/XPCOM_Interface_Reference/nsIFaviconService
  

  You must use a bookmark to retrieve the favicon of Firefox.

• Are all third-party modules?

  I am required to my new job to disable/remove all third-party add-ons. Is it possible to discern which modules are third parties and which are not? Are all third-party modules? Please notify. Thank you!

  Hello girliegig, yes the absolute majority of the addons is from third-party developers. Mozilla's development / however has a few extensions (mainly the dictionary packs): https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/user/mozilla/