LabVIEW 2011 GPU accelerated?

Similar Questions

• Qosmio X 770-107 - question GPU acceleration and low of the FPS game while

  Hi all

  As everyone knows (i) hope including Toshiba tech we face breakdowns of sparks/Framerate GPU limitation/Low FPS during the game, even in the game of old or new brand and down or in the highest video settings.

  So lets start with the history of the mine: I bought my Toshiba Qosmio x 770-107-3D about $2600 so I was in Qatar to the 13.04.2012... In fact since the beginning of the purchased when I am faced with this famous problem of limitation GPU... I tried a lot of things, cleaning the fan, bios and driver chart updated-decommissioning, using software overclocking, combining different versions of graphics drivers with different versions of bios drivers, also including the suggestions in this tread:

  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=63615

  2 days ago, I sent an email to Toshiba UK support and local support. Unfortunately I have no answer, I probably wouldn't be as usual. And I left one term of 7 months. As everyone knows; even if I sent it to Toshiba repair service, 99% they say the fault of the user or the dirty vere fans and we reflash the bios. who has no sense for us and they're going to get him back without GPU acceleration problem soving...

  In summary that I am out of options, I'm really tempted to try to solve this problem of trottling gpu...
  Maybe I should sent cell phone service and with their report of nonsense I should consider rights costumer Court in my country... will be 4 to 6 months, but in the end 90% I win.

  I am really bored and tired of playing the games lag in every 10 minutes.
  Yesterday, with and without external display, + with slot and overclocking, + video settings further down, I played Company of heroes 2 and Battlefield 2 and 4 with ventilation of the limitation and the new GPU framerate... it's totally waste of money and my time of 2 years. I want to buy alienware instead of Qosmio 2 years...

  What should I do? You really have a permanent solution for this? I await your comments.

  Win7
  BIOS v2.10
  Graphics driver v33x.x

  Kind regards.

  I read the reviews of users and customers in the thread you link above and it seems that the limitation issue was already resolved. The combination of the BIOS (v1.1?) and nVidia Driver seems to be the key.

• Migrate from Vision Builder for LabVIEW 2011 2012

  Can I migrate LabVIEW 2011 Vision Builder AI 2012? Or I have to install LabVIEW 2012?

  Nope. If you have the Vision builder AI 2012 it supports LabVIEW 2011:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/A2639FCFCCB2A8B086257FA300559827

• Report Generation Toolkit compatibility with Microsoft Office 2013 and LabVIEW 2011

  Hello

  I design the 2011 Version of LabView to test solid state device and need to create test data after this unit tested.

  When I save the test data in the configuration of Excel after you run the Laview program, it created an error like "error - 41007 is is produced in NI_report.lvclass:New Report.v->... OR reports; Musr you have the LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office installed to create this type of report. The musr toolkit also have an activated license or be in trial mode. »

  Questions: Do I need to install LabView Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office on my computer? If Yes, what is the LabView Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office Version. Where can I find this software?. I use Labview 2011, Windows 7, MS 2013 in the computer.

  Thank you

  Jonathan Tran

  You can try this: http://download.ni.com/evaluation/labview/ekit/other/downloader/2011RGT.exe

  From this link: http://download.ni.com/evaluation/labview/ekit/other/downloader/

• PROFIBUS in Labview 2011

  Hello

  I recently updated my Labview from 2010 to 2011. And then I tried to install the latest driver for Profibus (DF_PROFI_II_LV_1.36.2.zip) that I downloaded from (http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/id/2687/lang/en). Release date: 10/10/2011

  Normally, this extension must be installed to the location following (C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\LabVIEW 2010\vi.lib\addons). However, I did find it in the folder "addons" Labview 2011. There never to this question? To resolve this problem, should I just copy Comsoft.lib in the folder "addons" from 2010 to 2011? Something else I have to do?

  Thank you

  Zhi

  I t looks like that it detected the LV 2010 version as the current and did not install anything in 2011. You should be able to copy files on the same path mentioned.

  DirkW

• FieldPoint for Labview 2011 W7 - 64 bit

  Hello

  I'm currently having problems running FieldPoint Labview 2011 on running on Windows 7 64 bit system. I installed the latest (6.0.9) FieldPoint driver which is compatible with 64-bit systems. However, when I try to make a simple program (see photo A). I met two main problems.

  (1) I'm not allowed to add a control, or a constant to the FieldPoint i/o Point in terminal (see illustration B). The option is grayed out.

  2) there is an error with the FPLVMgr.dll file that is used by virtually every necessary .vi for FieldPoint (see picture C)

  I'd appreciate any help. If you need to know the application, I have a Thermocouple cFP-RTD-122. I'm trying to implement a simple program to read out temperature (see picture D). E PIC shows my MAX.

  Thank you!

  Juan

  Hey Juan,.

  I see you are using 64-bit Windows, but you use a LabVIEW 2011 64 bit as well?  FieldPoint runs on a 64 bit OS, but does not work in the 64-bit LabVIEW environment.  I would recommend installation of environment 32-bit LabVIEW and go from there.

• Executable VI with Labview 2011

  Hello everyone, I'm doing an executable on LabVIEW 2011 SP1. I've never done before, but in my project, I go to tools-> Build Application (EXE) from VI... I check to make sure that all the Sub VI are in the Dependencies tab and I put the way I want the EXE to go, then I build it. Building compiles and I have good Run-Time Engine installed, but when I go to open the EXE file, I get a lot of mistakes because void VI could not be loaded. I checked these Sub VI that were not loaded and they are locked and password protected. Probably comes with LabVIEW, so they don't want to play us with anything. How can I get these included in the EXE and not return an error?

  Thank you.

  I deleted the Run-Time Engine and downloaded again, and I think it worked. Strange, but I accept it

• Ask for a link for Labview 2011 SP1

  I ask for the link to download the Labview 2011 SP1.

  I have a bug that corrects SP1 (damaged Panel before, cannot open vi, see the discussion http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-load-error-code-3-Could-not-load-front-panel/td-p/1895379/pa...), but the download link disappeared.

  Please, if anyone knows tell me the link to download (32 bit).

  I found it here

  http://download.NI.com/support/softlib/LabVIEW/labview_development_system/2011%20SP1/

  Anyway, there are a few problems with the link that you gave to me. I thank you all the same because what is happening is somethink wronk with national instruments site, which is not the same for all countries (web designers should check and fix the bug).

• 9.30 NIDAQ drivers not install LabVIEW 2011 - example. Microsoft .com's in LabVIEW 2010 under vi.llb

  I just upgraded to LabVIEW 2011 without uninstalling LabVIEW 2010.  I downloaded the last set of drivers DAQmx 9.30.  I find that these drivers are installed in a DAQmx folder under the vi.llb of theLabVIEW 2010 and NOT in the vi.llb of LabVIEW 2011.  The DAQmx features do not appear on the menus and the existing instances are reported as 'cannot be compiled. How can I get the DAQmx functions to properly install LabVIEW 2011?

  You must DAQmx 9.4.

  9.4 DAQmx

• LabVIEW 2011 compiled the application crash

  I'm writing an application DAQ simple enough to use in a freshman Engineering Lab is written to the USB-6211. Since it will be used at more than one campus, I try to make a compiled application. Demand, such as built in LabVIEW 2011, works very well. The problem is that the compiled executable hangs in the same places without fail. I've included the source VI unmodified and a version with the acquisition of data code disabled and some dialogue inserted to track the progress of the request. Executables for both are also included.

  I use a architecture of producer/consumer-events to manage the three tasks of data acquisition. Consumers loop will fail after one of the three DAQ events are executed. Consumers loop works very well for the exit event. I also returned to LabVIEW 2010 and recompiled, the same failures.

  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  Stuart

  I think that if you close the front panel to start the VI, it will leave the built application.

  Replace the properies "FP.open" with "FP." State"and toggle between 'Hidden' and 'Normal'. That seems to work in my limited testing.

• LabVIEW 2011 SP1

  I was wondering if anyone knows if\when Labview 2011 the service pack will be available?  Have just got the CD for 2011 of it Department, but realizing that they often release a service pack in February in order to don't want to lose a day to install the original on machines only to withdraw again.

  Service Packs generally download released, but NEITHER pre-announce them. Installation of LV2011 before the Service Pack is not a big deal, certainly useless "uninstall anything" before the Service Pack on your computer. If you include addons or tool boxes, these are usually not updated in the service pack there are a number of good reasons to go ahead and put 2011 on your computer now.

• Labview 2011 project with sbRIO cannot build app with Lv 2014 RT: error 1003

  Hello

  I have a project developed with labview 2011. It contains a PC application and a SbRIO-RT-FPGA app.

  I made a simple change in a RT VI. then I tryied to build the new application for my SbRIO.

  the problem is when I click on 'Build', an error dialog box appears saying that there is a VI with broken arrow. but my VI are OK.

  Can you help me please!

  Best regards

  

  
  

• LabVIEW labview 2011 2003

  I am completely new to labview and I want to do a compression test with frame of MTS

  I got a code that is written in labview 3 but it does not work (I think it's a problem compabality) in labview 2011 (the version I have access too and my acquisition of data works with)

  I have to fix as soon as possible because I do my research and I did not have enough time to understand the code. I use PCI-MIO-16-4 and I need to 3 channels for moving loadcell, extensometer and Phillips.

  I appreciated if anyone can give me a direction for this

  Thank you

  Roozi

  Your topic says 2003 but your message says version 3 - a huge difference. If you are able to load, it is not the version 3. See if you get an error message that the code is old to convert, then post to Conversion of Version map you linked to at the top of the page.

• Font size too small LabVIEW 2011

  Hello

  I'm new to LabVIEW 2011.  I'm running a problem when I load LabVIEW all the font size seems to be very low and I don't know how to do more.  It is difficult to see where everything is small.  Please see photo attached below.

  I tried to fix LabVIEW 2011 and I even uninstalled and reinstalled but the police still proved to be small.

  Help, please.

  Thank you so much in advance.

  Marlin12

  What operating system? Have you changed a setting in the operating system, like maybe the default font size or DPI settings? Try deleting the file labview.ini and have LabVIEW recreate from scratch (it will be repeated when you start and it can not find). You can also try adding these lines to the labview.ini file:

  appFont = "Tahoma" 13
  systemFont = "Tahoma" 13

  dialogFont = "Tahoma" 13

• Deal with failure when using LabVIEW 2011 and DSC MODBUS communication

  I'm currently reading from operating records a PLC with MODBUS/TCP. I confirmed that the PLC will update the values and in response to a MODBUS communication correctly by using a third-party program called Modbus Poll. However, when I try to query the PLC using the LabVIEW shared variable engine, I am unable to read the values of the same addresses that I consult with Modbus Poll.

  My installation is simply to a PC directly connected to the controller via Ethernet without a router between the two. I'm using LabVIEW 2011 SP1 with the DSC module.

  I opened the Manager of distributed systems OR to display the State of all variables in the Modbus Library that I created, and I noticed that the ILO CommFail permanently the value 'true '. All other variables with a 'read' access mode signal "failure of process". I tried to restart the process and stop and start the local variable engine without success. I also restarted my computer several times to see if any services did not exist, but this does not appear to have solved the problem.

  Finally, I resorted to listening to communications on the network card I have the PLC connected via Ethernet using Wireshark and found that while Modbus Poll communicates with PLC, number of MODBUS and TCP packet is sent and received. However, when using only LabVIEW or the DSM OR communicate with the controller, there don't seem to be any communication on the network card.

  Something that may be interesting to note is that I could communicate with the PLC and to read values with the DSM just once, when I understood everything first what address I should be reading of. All of this has stopped working shortly after. Prior to this, 'CommFail' was not generally set to 'true' with my current setup. Thinking it was my firewall, I have since disabled my firewall, but this seems to have had no effect on the problem either.

  Any help on this would be appreciated.

  So, I thought about it. It turns out that the IP address of the server i/o MODBUS must be set to the address of the MODBUS slave, not the local computer. The address of the i/o MODBUS server is defined by the navigation in the Explorer window projects, expanding the variable engine shared library for MODBUS and right click on the server MODBUS (for example Modbus1) item and select Properties.

  In addition, the addresses seem to be shifted by + 1.

  Thanks for the tip so.