Large swimming pool

Similar Questions

• How can I improve accuracy of swimming pool?

  I tried my new Apple Watch series 2 in the pool today.  The pool at the University I work is 15 m wide and I did 30 laps.  I don't flip turn.  After my workout my watch said I did 55 laps in one less than 30 minutes.  After checking the part passing through and taking care that the hand (my watch is on), I touch the side with, I think two things.  First, it considers the key on one side a tower.  Is there a way to change this?  Second, you can improve the accuracy of the Tower, well than doubled in my case, taking care not to touch with the same hand that your watch.  Can it be formed or changed somehow?

  Also, when I started my training you only gave me the choice of the number of calories to burn.  Is there a way to set a number of towers, or do a training session open, instead?

  Hello

  When starting a swim practice, slide sideways on the screen of the goal to choose a different goal, including a workout open-ended.

  Watch OS is designed to improve the accuracy of the estimates for training of swimming over time automatically by analyzing the effectiveness of your race.

  If you want to share your comments with Apple about your problems with the application, you can do so here:

  https://www.Apple.com/feedback/watch.html

• Swimming pool series 2 pool length QUESTION

  When I try to start a pool swim, why are my pool length options 0-x yards vs say:

  -vgs 25

  -25 m

  -50 m

  It's ridiculous and if I want to swim in an Olympic pool, how can I ensure training will be recording with precision (laps, distance, same HR)?

  so far, not good with series 2 for fitness addicts. It seems that this watch (like the latter) too focused on activity monitoring for older and/or shape (rings) people and is not good for people who are in need of fitness Garmin-esque data.

  You do not discuss Apple here. This is a user to user support forum, Apple does not participate.

  If you have Apple to know how you feel about this issue, then click on the link back here, http://www.apple.com/feedback and click on the box in this area.

• Two servers to connect internal using the virtual machine even in a swimming pool?

  I was deploying a pilot here VDI environment.  Working with the deployment with the planning guides, most things went smoothly.  However, in practice (and by the guides and information online) I learned that ultimately it works best to have two individual servers to connect internal (not replicated). a dedicated to access internal only, and the other coupled with a security server in the DMZ.

  My question is, can a system (physical workstation w / agent or VM) live in a resource pool manual for two managers of internal connections?  What is the best way to manage a scenario in which a worker would use a specific virtual machine during the day (and thus the internal connection manager), verus remotely using this same VM?

  Also, when you have a connection to Server 2, should a 2nd database of events created in SQL, or if it can share the same database of events?

  Thank you!

  sketchy00 wrote:

  However, in practice (and by the guides and information online) I learned that ultimately it works best to have two individual servers to connect internal (not replicated). a dedicated to access internal only, and the other coupled with a security server in the DMZ.

  Lol this is not correct. For a mode environment that supports both internal and external users, it is true that you should have one or more servers dedicated to the internal connection and one or more dedicated for external, but they should all work as a replica group. for example, to install the first as a standard instance and others as a replica instance. In this way, users can access the same pools they are internal and external, administration can be performed only once on the entire environment.

  Architecture and planning guide is a good reference.

  http://pubs.VMware.com/view-50/topic/com.VMware.ICbase/PDF/view-50-architecture-planning.PDF

  In particular, look at the diagram page 61 that shows this. All 4 connection servers are in the same group of replicated, then it will have been installed as a standard and others installed as replicas. Of course, you don't have to have 4 unless you have HA needs, you can have just two and so without balancing the load, but in all these cases, the connection servers share the configuration via the replication data.

  I hope this helps.

  Select this option.

• I can't get the page to scroll properly. It looks like its swimming pool when I go up and down the page and takes forever. How should I do?

  I had a conflict of interest in order to get rid of one of the display drivers.
  Since then, the page is a not properly scroll. I had this happen in the past and that you do not remember how I fixed it.

  This help if you disable smooth scrolling?

  Tools > Options > advanced > general: navigation: "Use smooth scrolling".

• Dedicated vs Shared Question

  I'm trying to understand if my DB run dedicated or shared. I have read several posts here, but some information is contradict each other on my server. Is my analysis up to now and it leads me to believe that I am running in dedicated server mode, but I'd love to help to better understand if I'm right. Thank you in advance for your help!
  
  1. we have a splitter, but you always get when you create a database with DBCA and this does not mean that the DB is running in common.
  
  SQL > show parameter dispatcher
  
  NAME TYPE
  ------------------------------------ --------------------------------
  VALUE
  ------------------------------
  channel dispatchers
  (PROTOCOL = TCP)
  whole MAX_DISPATCHERS
  
  2 Large_poole_size is 0 and I think that if the DB is shared then it will use the large pool, or use the shared pool.
  SQL > show parameter large_pool
  
  NAME TYPE
  ------------------------------------ --------------------------------
  VALUE
  ------------------------------
  Whole large LARGE_POOL_SIZE
  0
  
  3. If shared_servers is greater than 1, then the server is shared but ours is set to 1.
  SQL > show parameter SHARED_SERVERS
  
  NAME TYPE
  ------------------------------------ --------------------------------
  VALUE
  ------------------------------
  whole max_shared_servers
  
  Whole SHARED_SERVERS
  1
  
  4. the tnsnames.ora file has SERVER = DEDICATED, which means that the DB is NOT shared regardless of the top.
  
  5 ps - ef | grep $ORACLE_SID | grep d000 shows a splitter, but I think it's just the default.
  4456 1 Oracle 0 Mar17? 00:00:55 ora_d000_ENGTREQ1

  by default when you create a database using DBCA, it will be configured in dedicated server mode.

  1. those that you noticed is the basic configuration. the actual work of the shared server architecture will be launched when you specify a value for the DISPATCHERS parameter. By default, you will see this value as 1, but that doesn't mean database is to use it. as mentioned in another point, if you want to use shared mode, then SERVER = SHARED must be mentioned in tnsnames.ora on the client side.

  2 large swimming pool is 0 in your case because you use MEMORY_TARGET 11 g or 10 g SGA_TARGET (you did not mention the version of your database)

  3, here too, the default value for shared_servers is 1 and this is not that this option is enabled.

  If you want a shared mode to be effective, then you need to set the parameters at the db level below

  DISPATCHERS
  MAX_DISPATCHERS
  SHARED_SERVERS
  MAX_SHARED_SERVERS

  and the SERVER = SHARED must be mentioned in the client's tnsnames.ora file side.

• Group/pool FS7610 and EQL limits

  Hello

  Previously, I was informed here: -.

  "A FS76x0"single"comes as a unit of 2 knots (Controller) which can serve up to 509. If you add a 2nd FS76x0 and form a 'cluster' all numbers is doubled which means 1000 TB. »

  When talking to Dell to try to conceive and to buy a NAS solution to complement or integrate our storage EQL PS I had now some contradictory information about what you get by adding a second FS7610 and forming a cluster within a group/single pool, namely that the capacity is the same that there is 1 or 2 FS7610 nodes.  Note the last sentence.

  Anyway, it doesn't seem I can get 1PB without having at least 2 groups EQL on the same infrastructure, each with 1 or more FS7610 and up to 8 speakers. However if I've already said here is true I can at least postpone for a while that I'll be able to go from 4 to 5 years before I reached the limit of one group/pool/nas.

  Scalability

  The FS76x0 and the EqualLogic SAN offer a solution file, and can scale easily block and

  effectively, as customer needs grow over time. The flexible architecture of the fluid file system

  with paintings of the series PS allows expansion of storage capacity and performance capabilities within the

  a unique namespace. The FS device can address up to a maximum of useful capacity of 509 TB

  available from a single EqualLogic storage pool. 1 to 8 may consist of a pool EqualLogic PS

  berries (members) of the series.

  Notes:

  A group of EqualLogic can have only a single NAS cluster. A NAS cluster consists of one or two

  Devices FS providing file services.

  · A group of EqualLogic can have one or two devices FS76x0 NAS running together in a

  NAS cluster.

  · Can access a cluster consisting of one or two FS76x0 devices in a group EqualLogic NAS

  storage of file from a single pool of EqualLogic only. You can assign a device FS76x0

  a swimming pool and another of FS76x0 for another pool.

  ·

  The maximum capacity of the file a NAS cluster (and thus a group EqualLogic) able to export is

  509 to useful (all a single pool, EqualLogic).

  Currently, you can only assign a "SIN" to a single group and pool.  This NAS unit may consist of one or two main units.  If you have two, then it forms a single cluster and the two will have access to the same pool.   So, yes currently to serve our 1PB you would need two FS76x0 and two groups EQL with 509 to each.   As newer, larger drives are available which will increase.  I would check with your sales/reseller for an overview of the product road map.

• Maximum number of Pools of IP on ASA5540

  Hi all

  We currently deploy a new IPSec VPN solution to our customers.  Thanks to this that they can access their local desktop home off hours, so a typical VPN solution.

  The question I have is that we support more 1,200 sites, some of which could be grouped into larger units, so I can attribute a large 24 IP pool for them and others who may consist of one office, that in general we allocate one only 29 pool IP to.  The single desk type, we have more than 600 sites, of which most have so far not requested a VPN access.

  So my question is how IP pools can be configured on a Cisco ASA 5540?

  Thank you very much

  Mike.

  Mike,

  AFAIU, do us not resitrict amount of local swimming pools, I've never had to deal with this limitation.

  We do not restrict the amount of tunnel groups, however.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/vpngrp.html#wp1238985

  M.

• Movement of the members of the default pool

  I have a band with a PS6210xs and a PS6210x. The x is in the default pool and the xs is in a different pool. Together, they hold more than 26 TB of data, so any member can contain data in itself. We have also a new 6210 x that I'm about to join. I'm hoping to join the new table for the group, but not all have the data move to it at first, so I have a few questions.

  6210 x and 6210xs may be in the same pool (putting aside the question of space for a moment)? The hybrid to run raid 6 fast forward and the other just races raid 6.

  If they can do in a pool, there's a downside in terms of performance for this?

  Back to the question of space, and before reach us the new table, is it possible to move the 6210 x of the pool by default to other basins, if the Member of the other pool doesn't have enough free space in itself?

  If I can't do this, it is possible to join the new table for the group, but move to a brand new swimming pool until it begins to automatically get the data from the other Member of the default pool?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Because they have two members are not in the same pool, I would leave as-is.   You can have up to four pools in a group.

  When you add a member to a group, it has no RAID assigned level.  And so it has no space to provide for the group.  He is assigned to the default group, but you can create a new pool and it will install everything first.   Then set the RAID type.  In addition, you can delay making the space available for the group as an option to create time.  That would give you time to move the Member to a new pool.

  Kind regards

  Don

• Move again iSCSI LUNS in the new pool group

  Hi, we have currently 2 equalogic groups, each group has a swimming pool. They are on the same subnet. We are in the process of consolidation of the SAN into a single group, but before we do that we have a couple of LUN that we go to the target group. In addition to stopping the services on the servers involved and by copying new data targets, is possible to transfer a logic unit number between groups?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Sure.

  The transfer function of a logic unit between groups number is called 'Async '. Replication' :)

  1. configuration of the replication partner. The target has to offer 'space delegate '.

  2 Configure volume replication. After closure of the initial copy down all the connected servers and do a replication to transfer the last delta

  3 adjust the volume offline and on the target of the group perform a "promotion."

  4 disable replication

  5. check the ACL and reconfigure hosts

  Kind regards

  Joerg

• Delete the single pool of the Group

  Hello

  Is it possible to remove a member from a group that is the sole member of a swimming pool without losing data in this pool?
  I want to add that members of a new group and keep the pool.

  Kind regards

  Arnaud

  No, remove a member needs to evacuate all the data to the rest of the members first. If there is no member or free space left you can not remove the Member.

  Also delete removes the configuration of a member.

  Kind regards

  Joerg

• ASA VPN cannot ping ip local pool

  Hello

  We have ASA 5510 a device be deployed for a period of time. Everything works fine except customers local VPN cannot ping local customer VPN which get their IP address to the local swimming pool. They can ping anywhere on the local network of company, but not each other. I don't know there's a logical explantion for this because of an ACL but all appreciated the advice...

  Thanks in advance

  Keith

  Hi Keith,

  I think that, in order to allow a customer VPN reach another VPN client, the SAA should turn the VPN traffic (because it will receive the traffic of a VPN tunnel and re - again to send another tunnel.)

  Can you add "same-security-traffic intra-interface permits" and try again?

  Federico.

• ASA5520 migration pool VPN remote access

  Hi all, looking for an entry in the best way to migrate to a new pool to access remote a DHCP address assignment.  We currently use a 24 pool, allowing us to 253 IP addresses... during the recent hurricane, we reached 250 used IP addresses and had to start asking users to connect to our device ASA VPN to another country, not an ideal solution.  I would like to extend our current VPN subnet to a 23, but I'm not a free 24 subnet above (or below) our current 24 subnet.

  I can certainly affect a new/23 subnet, but I'm looking for the best with minimal downtime migration plan (no interruption of service would be better).  Can I just add the new range of pool to the section of general-attributes tunnel-group RAVPN the current pool, or should I remove the old swimming pool, disconnect all remote access VPN users and have them reconnect to start to use the new pool?

  We run ASA Version 8.2 (1).

  Thank you!

  Hello

  I need to confirm (EDIT: checked everything in writing it) myself that I have not needed to do this before, BUT to my knowledge, you should be able to assing more of a DHCP pool on a single Client VPN connection.

  Please check the Cisco ASA command reference for 8.2

  VPN configuration pool under Tunnel-group configurations

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/command/reference/A2.html#wp1656186

  VPN configuration pool under Group Policy configurations

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/command/reference/A2.html#wp1660582

  They are in fact at the same location in the same document.

  Seems to me that there should be no problem to add another 24 pool to your Client VPN configurations (and do the necessary ACL / NAT Configurations)

  -Jouni

• Pool view 6.1.1 horizon with persistent drive

  I have pool the disk use persistent

  When detach a persistent vm disk and recreate the machine in the same pool machine is created with the new name (old is removed from the display console and vcenter) but in events, I 16 000 with the message error events:

  "Provisioning error has occurred to the Machine VMKP005: unable to remove the Machine from the inventory.

  I tried this KB KB VMware: manual removal linked clones or embusked virtual office entries in the database View Composer VMwar...
  and machine with this name is not existing in ADAM or call DB.

  In the server connection log

  2015 07-21 T 17: 03:37.496 + 02:00 INFO (103 C-0A7C) < propagate-af856f12-0a3d-417d-83cb-ea185ede0cd6 > [PendingOperation] control of pool for office kp_2015_07 removes VM VMKP005

  2015 07-21 T 17: 03:27.464 + 02:00 WARN (103 C - 1 to 30) < PendingOperation-vm-25907-DeletingLC > [PendingOperation] failed to delete VM: /View/vm/Kanal_Partnerski_2013.02/KP_2015_07/VMKP005 of the View Composer inventory - cannot retrieve information from the virtual computer.

  2015 07-21 T 17: 03:27.468 + 02:00 ERROR (103 C - 1 to 30) < PendingOperation-vm-25907-DeletingLC > [PendingOperation] failed to mark /View/vm/Kanal_Partnerski_2013.02/KP_2015_07/VMKP005 VM as ERROR after failing to remove the SVI [LDAP: error code 32-0000208 D: NameErr: IDDM - 0310020 A, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best game of football from:]

  Any idea?

  When detaching comes from a survey then edit disc persistent to move to another pool and then recreate machine in the new swimming pool there is no error and works very well.

  Please try below steps:

  1. first of all restart view and vCenter servers as suggests below KB.

  VMware KB: Restarting recommended environmental VMware View Horizon Cycle

  2. If the problem persists, connect to the DB composer you use management studio and run the script against DB composer below.

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_TASK_STATE

  WHERE SIM_CLONE_ID = (SELECT ID FROM [dbo]. SVI_SIM_CLONE WHERE VM_NAME like 'vmkp005')

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_SC_PDISK_INFO

  WHERE PARENT_ID = (SELECT ID FROM [dbo]. SVI_SIM_CLONE WHERE VM_NAME like 'vmkp005')

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_SC_BASE_DISK_KEYS

  WHERE PARENT_ID = (SELECT ID FROM [dbo]. SVI_SIM_CLONE WHERE VM_NAME like 'vmkp005')

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_SIM_CLONE

  WHERE VM_NAME = 'vmkp005. '

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_COMPUTER_NAME

  WHERE NAME = 'vmkp005 '.

  DELETE

  TABLE [dbo]. SVI_VM_NAME

  WHERE NAME = 'vmkp005 '.

• want to install trial - confused about the ip pool/ip addresses

  So I downloaded the FVO and attempted to deploy devices (latest version of 5.7.x). When I tried everything first he said I need an IP pool. OK, so I guess that... Well I don't know why I need a pool of ip, but I created an and associated with the correct vsphere portgroup/network. Now, I need to choose the IP address - he invites in trust manual/fixed or dhcp - of course, I want to give fixed ip servers, but then it says "ip address cannot be in ip pool.

  huh?

  I don't understand - what is the purpose of the ip pool, otherwise to assign ip addresses to the devices?

  no problem, thanks for the reply.

  I have re-read the start guide however, and this time it was spotted in the network settings section configures where he describes the creation of the pool:

  "Do not select the checkbox enable the Pool IP and do not specify a range of IP addresses. You specify it

  IP address for the virtual machines in the TIME using the Deployment Wizard OVF VAPP. »

  Weird - and it worked. Not sure why we need a swimming pool in the first place, then. HMMPH