LDAP attribute on user card match no group

We currently have Anyconnect (client based) up and running on our ASA 5515 X 9.5 (1) running. I use AD LDAP for authentication and configuration of LDAP attribute maps and assigned to our LDAP on the ASA server config. Like many, we use these cards to allow ASA assign a group policy to a user based on the AD group membership. Basically I have one AD Group for regular of VPN users and a group for users Admin VPN advertising. It works pretty well, but there are cases where the user profile specific related to group policy 'Regular users of VPN' does not work for all users of this ad group. I was trying to find a way to adjust the settings for certain users based on the user name. Say the user needs setting up VPN from an RDP session, but I'm not all users have that so I would attribute a group different local\Configuration user profile based on the AD username that would allow the VPN from a RDP session. Still, the rest of the users would be blocked to the RDP VPN. Here is my map to attribute LDAP database:

map-attribute LDAP
name of the memberOf Group Policy map
map-value memberOf "LDAP path."
msRADIUSFramedIPAddress IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address card name

Now I could do here with the above configuration, I think it's to create a new group policy on the SAA for a certain group of users and then create a new value of the card with a new LDAP path that would point to a new group in AD, say "RDP VPN users". I then add the users I want Anyconnect group policies\user specific profiles for this particular ad group. But the question is that I would prefer not to have to create as many groups in AD.

I want to know is if there is a way to have a path of card value of LDAP attribute to a certain username AD somehow. As if the LDAP path was something like "CN =, OU = users, DC =, DC ='.»» This way I could affect a group policy to the majority of users in the group "Regular users of VPN" AD, but then assign a different policy to some users who require slightly different settings. That would allow me to match on a certain user, not one ad group? The Group cisco-attribute-name strategy addresses a user as if it were an ad group? I guess not, but not sure. I looked through the list of names of attributes-cisco - but didn't see anything that looked like it worked for AD user names.

Also, if anyone knows a better way please let me know I am open to suggestions. I hope that makes sense. Thanks in advance to the community for help.

I think that you need a completely different approach - DAP (dynamic access policies).

DAP allows a lot of motion of things, and you can create additive strategies.  So if you are a member of the group 'A' you add to this URL.  If you are also a member of the group 'B' you add this ACL.  If it can also do other things, like checking the registry keys, etc.

The Guide deployment of DAP.

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

I pretty much don't use DAP now (and no attribute is mapped) due to the significant increase in flexibility.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Auth of remote VPN through LDAP allow all users!

    Hello

    I have 5505 firewall and security license. I have configure remote VPN on firewall through CLI with the commands below. Remote VPN works well, but the problem is, it allows all remote VPN users. I need to restrict remote VPN access bit user, I need to configure via CLI, I don't want to go through ASDM, can someone help me with CLI?

    ASDM I can able to perfom below things I'm not able to perform through CLI

    Configuration-> access to the network (Client)-> dynamic access policies

    Through ASDM I'm able to set the VPN users are allow to remote VPN access, how to set up same thing through CLI

    Here's my CLI:

    LDAP attribute-map CISCOMAP

    name of the KFG IETF Radius-class card

    map-value VPN CN = VPN, DC = domain, DC = com noaccess_pri

    map-value VPN CN = VPN, DC = domain, DC = com noaccess_bk

    map-value VPN CN = VPN, DC = domain, DC = com splitgroup_pri

    map-value VPN CN = VPN, DC = domain, DC = com splitgroup_bk

    AAA-server ldapgroup protocol ldap

    ldapgroup AAA-server (inside) host 10.1.10.5

    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com

    LDAP-scope subtree

    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName

    LDAP-login-password Inf0rmati0n1

    LDAP-connection-dn cn = VPN, dc = domain, dc = com

    microsoft server type

    LDAP-attribute-map CISCOMAP

    internal noaccess_pri group policy

    attributes of the strategy of group noaccess_pri

    VPN - concurrent connections 0

    output

    internal noaccess_bk group policy

    attributes of the strategy of group noaccess_bk

    VPN - concurrent connections 0

    output

    internal splitpolicy_pri group policy

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSEC l2tp ipsec

    tunnel-group splitgroup_pri General-attributes

    ldapgroup group-LOCAL authentication server

    internal splitpolicy_bk group policy

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSEC l2tp ipsec

    tunnel-group splitgroup_bk General-attributes

    ldapgroup group-LOCAL authentication server

    Thank you

    Abhishek

    Hello

    You cannot configure the DAP via CLI Protocol because the configuration is saved in a file dap.xml and is stored in flash of the SAA.

    You can configure the DAP protocol using the following link:

    http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_white_paper09186a00809fcf38.shtml#T4

    Also note that the link mentions the following:

    Note:

    The dap.xml file that contains the attributes of selection policies DAP, is stored in flash of the SAA. Although you can export the file dap.xml out, the edit box (if you know about the xml syntax), and re - import again, be very careful, because you might ASDM stop treatment of DAP files if you have misconfigured something. There is no CLI to handle this part of the configuration.

    I hope this helps.

    Kind regards

    Anisha

    P.S.: Please mark this message as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

  • Mapping of LDAP attributes

    If you use LDAP attributes to map users to a specific group on the SAA is it necessary for group lock if I want a user to connect to a single group? I use the Cisco-Group Policy attribute to map an LDAP attribute = an employee service e.g. sales, marketing, research, etc..

    Kind regards

    Charles

    No, if you already configure map LDAP attribute, then there is no need to configure Group locking because map LDAP attribute will automatically map the user to the specific group policy you have created through mapping.

    Hope that answers your question.

  • Delivery set of users in a particular group in AD - custom or STANDARD?

    I can supply a specific set of users in a particular group within an LDAP (for example AD) using IOM OOTB?

    The customer wants a set in bulk users are created directly in a specific in the ad group so that users have access to this resource group. Hints/tips/ideas?

    If customization is required, then can which API/method be used?

    Thank you
    -oidm.

    You can create a field defined by the user and the recon on the IOM user profile to fill in this field. Based on this attribute, you can create a rule group membership and access policy related to that group and the disposal of these ad groups.

    -Kevin

  • How to match tunnel-group with auth ASA 8.2 and IPSec VPN Client using digital certificates with Microsoft CA

    Hello

    I set up a lab for RA VPN with a version of the ASA5510 8.2 and VPN Client 5 software using digital certificates with Microsoft CA on a Windows 2003 server. I did the configuration based on this document from Cisco's Web site:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080930f21.shtml

    Now, the vpn works fine, but now I need to configure a tunnel-different groups so I can provide different services to different users. The problem I have now is that I don't know how to set it up for the certificate is the name of tunnel-group. If I do an ASA debug crypto isakmp I get this error message:

    % ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group through OR...
    % 3 ASA-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, no group found by matching well payload ID: unknown
    % ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group via IKE ID...
    % 3 ASA-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, no group found by matching well payload ID: unknown
    % ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group via IP ADDR...
    % ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group using default group...
    % ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

    So, basically, when using certificates I connect always VPN RA only with the group default DefaultRAGroup. Do I have to use a model of different web registration for application for a certificate instead of the user model? How can I determine the OU on the user certificate so that match tunnel-group?

    Please help me!

    Kind regards

    Fernando Aguirre

    You can use the group certificate mapping feature to map to a specific group.

    This is the configuration for your reference guide:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/security/ASA/asa82/configuration/guide/IKE.html#wp1053978

    And here is the command for "map of crypto ca certificate": reference

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/C5.html#wp2186685

    Hope that helps.

  • Adding custom in iPlanet attributes resource user

    I have a custom attribute in LDAP called "CustomAttr1" created. I would like to add this attribute in user RO iPlanet so that I can update this attribute by the IOM. What is the process to add this attribute to the user iPlanet process and forms?

    Have you checked the Document connector and particularly the section where it says "extending of the connector?
    This: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11223_01/doc.904/e10446/custom.htm#CDEGCCEB

    -Marie

  • ACS 3.2 - users 'ghosts' of a group

    It is a bit of a strange. We run ACS 3.2 (1) on a Windows 2000-based computer. We have about 30 groups for different users. The only group (Group 1) always tells us that we have 30 users that are actually part of the group. The group says 90 users but when you list users there is only 60. I moved all users to a new group and now it says there are 30 users in the group, but when you a list of people, it gives you nothing. I have backed up the database, did a new install of 3.2 (2) on another machine and perform a restore to this area and I always get the same result. I'm trying to find out if the Group has not correctly or if there are 30 users 'ghosts' somewhere! I recently inherited the ACS boxes so I don't know when this problem started.

    There seems to be all known bugs related to this. Has anyone else seen this before?

    Thank you!

    We have definitely corrected the issue and the matter is now closed. What we did that I sent him a copy of backup of ACS server so he could watch. He then sent back me a backup file saying they found the problem and restore the backup file to the ACS. The TAC Guy sent email me looked like this:

    "We cannot create a Dump.txt we can do on ACS installed on Windows Server by the csutil-d option basically on the device.

    This dump.txt is a readable format of the database unlike the .dmp

    I downloaded the .dmp sent by you on the ACS (Windows Server) service at my end created a dump.txt, corrected by running the perl script and downloaded and then turn it back on to the ACS server by the-l option of csutil. They I took a backup of the ACS and sent it. I have check the .dmp even on the device at my end to confirm the correction.

    It basically an indexing problem, caused when the admin deletes users and link pointer not are deleted in the registry of the origin of the problem.

    As discussed, regular backup, and performance of the dbcompact should help prevent this problem.

    I have attached the perl script, you can use it if necessary in the future.

    Hope this helps, feel free to contact me if you have further questions. At this point I go ahead and close the request service, as discussed. »

    If you want I can send you the email of the script that the guy sent me. But obviously as it said and what I thought, it's a matter of pointer in the database.

  • ISE ERS user access to some groups?

    Hello

    I am trying to create a simple operational interface for ISE 1.4 for the helpdesk people add mac addresses from endpoint to endpoint internal DB via REST.

    I would like to have the filtered helpdesk access (so that they can only create endpoints in a group given, not all groups), but it seems that the RBAC in ISE control for users of the RHS is all or nothing.

    I created a Custom Data Access Menu permissions then defined that a user in a group ERS Helpdesk would have access to it. On RBAC policy, I can not only specify a data access authorization, the system always makes me choose a permission to access the Menu as first option.

    If so I said that to the endpoint Group X, to access the data for a group of ERS Custom Data Access, the ERS user gets access denied to the DB.

    Only when I put the user on the RHS Admin by default, the default Super Admin Data Access group, it is able to have access to the DB.

    I would like to ask if anyone of you has managed to control the data set that is at HIA outside access or read access and if so, how.

    Thank you

    Gustavo Novais

    PS: ERS debug logs:

    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = PAPFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> passing the filter!
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = AtnAtzFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: adminName = RHS
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 INFO [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-AtnAtzFilter 401Blocked: user is not authorized to access the requested resource.
    2015-09-19 09:38:47, 175 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# RateLimitFilter Servlet => continue with the response of the RHS, the current number of bucket: 49
    2015-09-19 09:39:15, 992 INFO [admin-http-pool279] [api.services.server.role.RoleImpl] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-extract the list of roles for entityFQN Information: NAC group: NAC
    2015-09-19 09:39:20, 328 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.persistance.dao.UserDAO] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-update of user as user name information: NAC Group: NAC:ers
    2015-09-19 09:39:20, 330 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.persistance.dao.MappingDAO] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-creating new mapping with rolebundle ' Global: Default "context" Global Context context: Global ' user ' NAC Group: NAC:ers' role ' NAC Group: NAC:RBACGroups:ERS Admin»
    2015-09-19 09:39:20, 333 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.server.mapping.MappingImpl] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-removing users from role with the name ' NAC Group: NAC:RBACGroups:ERS filters under contextFQN "Global Context context: Global", bundle Global role: by default "with transactional 'false' is
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 682 INFO [ers-http-pool732] [cisco.cpm.nsf.impl.UserIdentityManagement] -:-the internal authentication method to check if the policies in correspondence of the user groups duration is 7
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# RateLimitFilter Servlet => continue with the request of the RHS, the current number of bucket: 49
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = PAPFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> passing the filter!
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = AtnAtzFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: adminName = RHS
    2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: = RHS adminName is Admin ERS

    He does not seem to have many options when it comes to control access to resource api ers, I ended up doing my own local map in my web application to ad vs access groups groups endpoint.

  • Cisco ACS 4.2 a user in several local groups

    Currently, I like this group map

    ACS groups window

    GRP of GRP-A-B-1 and PDM - 2
    GRP - A. GRP - 1

    GRP - Grp-2 B

    For example currently a user test1 is part of two groups 1 and 2 under windows and is mapped to the Grp-A-B of the CSA. Is it possible if I delete the mapping of Grp-A-B in ACS and can see the user test1 speratley in both groups (Grp - A and Grp - B) to GBA?

    Salam Muhammad,

    If you have a local user in ACS, this user cannot be a member of both groups at the same time.

    The same concept applies to external users. They cannot be mapped to two different groups at the same time.

    If you delete the configuration of Grp-A-B, the test1 user will be mapped to the first group in the list because ACS 4.2 process mapping group in the order:

    ' the snip "'

    Order of group mapping

    ACS always maps users to a single group of TISA. However, a user can belong to several groups the group mapping. For example, a user named John could be a member of the ensemble of the engineering group and California, and at the same time be a member of the combination of Group Engineering and management. If the value of group ACS mappings exist for these two combinations, ACS must determine what group John should be affected.

    ACS prevents contradictory group set mappings by assigning an order of mapping for the whole group maps. When a user who is authenticated by an external user database is assigned to a group of ACS, ACS begins at the top of the list of groups for this database mappings. ACS sequentially checks group memberships of user in the database of the external user against each group mapping in the list. Where to find the first set group mapping corresponding memberships to external users in the user database, ACS assigns the user to the group this group map ACS and ends the process of mapping.

    ' the snip "'

    Reference:http://goo.gl/cvc474

    HTH

    Amjad

    Rating of useful answers is more useful to say "thank you".

  • Home page by default for OBIEE 11 g based on the users and the wise group

    Hi all

    I'm using OBIEE 11 g.

    I need set the page default dashboard for the user and the wise group.

    EX:

    User1 is belongs to Group1 and Role1 - they need to see the default homepage as Dashboard1.

    User2 is belongs to the Group 2 and Role2 - they need to see the default homepage as Dashboard2.

    Kindly guide me to achieve.

    Please answer as soon as POSSIBLE.

    Thanks in advance.

    RR

    It is generally considered poor form to scream as soon as POSSIBLE to a question. http://www.CatB.org/ESR/FAQs/smart-questions.html

    As far as your question goes, it is that the CHEMINPORTAIL variable is for:

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E23943_01/bi.1111/e10540/variables.htm#i1013436

    OBIEE - system (reserved variables) session variables | GerardNico.com (BI, OBIEE, data warehouse and OWB)

  • Apex 5, user "Is in the group" works for authorization seems to not work

    Hello team Apex,

    Apex 5

    I would use the construction Type of plan (user) "Is in the group" authorization feature, but it seems to not work.

    The user is in the group but nevertheless is not allowed.

    I checked this with "& APP_ALIAS. ' in the group element - that's how I would use it - and the Group static 'true' name too.

    (We have a group for all applications, where the group name is the same name of the App - just to understand the call below.)

    When I use it to place a further authorization scheme with "PL/SQL function body:

    Return apex_util.current_user_in_group (v ('APP_ALIAS'));

    -It works as expected.

    Can you please verify this?

    Thank you in advance!

    Concerning

    André

    Hi Andre,

    What type of authentication scheme you use? Because, according to the text of the authorization scheme aid groups will be just picked up for the authentication of the account of the APEX.

    • Group: enter a group name. Authorization succeeds if the group is activated as a dynamic group for the session (see APEX_AUTHORIZATION. ENABLE_DYNAMIC_GROUPS). If the application uses authentication to accounts Express request, this check also includes workspace groups that are granted to the user. If database authentication is used, this check also includes database roles that are granted to the user.

    I just tried "Is in the group" and had no problem to check my groups.

    BTW, in your PL/SQL code, there is no need to use the function of V, just use bind variables as syntax: APP_ALIAS

    Concerning

    Patrick

  • Verification of the users belonging to the Group spasfic weblogic server

    I built a simple service application web with jdeveloper 11.1.1.7 strategy (Wssp1.2 - 2007-Https-UsernameToken - Plain.xml) and deploy the weblogic 10.3. Everything works very well in both the client side and server.

    The client side is unable to call any method without specifying the username and password properties. The server automatically checks the user in users values define in weblogic server in the following path (summary of the areas of security > myrealm > users and groups). Hereby, the customer can access the system if he takes one of the users in this group even with the default user weblogic/weblogic.

    Question: How to limit the name to username/password check with specific usergroup?. That is, if the client mentions the name of user and password outside of the Group (even if the values are correct) the server rejects the request

    Problem, solved by (user name: Roque)

    in this link: java - verification of users within the spasfic group of weblogic server for the web service application - Stack Overflow

    Here is his answer for your reference:

    If you use the 'default' weblogic for users authentication method, you can follow these steps to set up an access group policy:

    • Connect to the weblogic administration console
    • Click on the links of deployments
    • Select your webservice
    • Click the Security tab
    • Click the sub-tab political
    • Choose your authorization provider in the menu drop-down (looks like by default)
    • Choose Add Conditions-> Group-> Type in the name of the Group
    • Finishing

    Now that the group you added should be able to invoke the web service. All other users should see something like:

    javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Access denied to operation myWebService

  • Shared Services 11.1.2 cannot remove affected user to a security group

    Shared Services 11.1.2 - trying to remove a user from the list of assigned users to a security group. Initially, I am able to delete the user and assigned users total decreases by one - but when I restart the properties of group - this user is still there? The change is not licensed. Any suggestion would be appreciated - thanks,

    Paul

    How about a quick restart HSS, see if this is useful and if not then:
    What is a MSAD user or a native user?
    It's happening with one user in all groups?
    This is what is happening with more then one user/group?

    See you soon... !!
    Rahul S.

  • Add grid user to the dba group

    Hello

    After installation of CARS, we are facing some problems in cluster. After investigation, Oracle support suggested adding the network user to the dba group. We missed to add the network user to the dba user in most of the nodes. It's Linux Redhat 5.
    How can I add user grid to the dba group and prevent the grid from other groups linux user? What is the correct order?

    Thank you
    Diego

    Hello
    As root:

    #### check before
     id  grid
    #### Change It
     usermod -a -G dba grid
    #### Check after
     id grid
    

    Levi Pereira

  • The last user to join a group of the network will have the peerID above?

    I thought a lot about how whether someone is the first user in a network group. Specifically, I was wondering if I could use the NEXT_DECREASING Mode send to see if someone had joined before a user. Michael Thornburgh said "the peerID persists for the duration of the connected NetConnection.  "as soon as he logs off, the peerID is destroyed and is never reused." That makes me hope that if a user leaves a mesh and joined to another, they would not get the same peerID. However, he also says that the peerIDs have a 'Pseudo-aléatoire' element in their generation, what makes me despair that she would follow a growing model. So to the heart of it: the last user to join a group of the network will have the peerID above?

    lol peer IDs are cryptographically pseudorandom and distributed between 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 and ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.

Maybe you are looking for