level locking monitoring line

Similar Questions

• How to get a level lock share line

  Is it possible to acquire a lock for sharing at the level of the lines, that would make all of the following conditions?
  1 prevent other update of this line.
  2. allow others to read this line.
  3. to allow others to update the other rows in the same table.
  
  
  I have the following scenario, where both transactions need eachother lockout:
  
  Implementation:
  Insert into TABLE_A (value_a) values ('ok');
  Insert into TABLE_B (value_b) values ('ok');
  
  Transaction r:
  Select value_b from TABLE_B
  If value_b = "ok", TABLE_A update set value_a = "not ok".
  
  Transaction B:
  Select value_a in the TABLE_A
  If value_a = "ok", TABLE_B update set value_b = "not ok".
  
  If transaction A runs first and then the final result is not 'ok' in the TABLE_A.
  If transaction B runs first and then the final result is not 'ok' only to TABLE_B.
  If both operations are running at the same time, it is possible to get the "not ok" in both tables. That's what I would like to prevent.
  
  
  A way to get what I want is to use "select for update":
  
  Transaction r:
  Select value_a in the TABLE_A for update
  Select value_b from TABLE_B for update
  If value_b = "ok", TABLE_A update set value_a = "not ok".
  
  Transaction B:
  Select value_a in the TABLE_A for update
  Select value_b from TABLE_B for update
  If value_b = "ok", TABLE_B update set value_a = "not ok".
  
  In this way that the two transactions will not perform their update unless they know the result if their selection will always be the same after that they commit. However, using "select for update" Transaction A has acquired an exclusive lock on the line TABLE_B. If a Transaction of C with the same content that the Transaction occurs simultaneously, then the two will be block eachother, even if both want is to read data from the same table.
  
  Another way is to use "lock table', however using it would block not only written on a specific, but written line in all the rows in the table. (In my example, there is only one line, but of course, this is just a simplified example).
  
  I looked at the "serializable" isolation level, but this doesn't seem to help because the queries and updates involve more than one table.
  
  
  I know that "readings do not block writes" is a fundamental part of the design of Oracle that makes Oracle what it is, but is it possible that I can do it explicitly will pass anyway? Or can you see another solution to what I want to achieve?

  Oracle does not have level shared row locks. The single line level lock oracle knows / uses is exclusive.
  The fact for example postgres (the syntax is... FOR ACTION) and the idea is exactly as above: you want to make sure that no other changes/deletions row but more than one transaction can contain this "guarantee" at the same time.

• Level lock table while truncating the partition?

  Below, I use the version of oracle.
  
  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  CORE Production 11.2.0.2.0
  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  
  I have a script to truncate the partition as below. Is there a table-level lock while truncating the parition? Any input is appreicated.
  
  ALTER TABLE TEMP_RESPONSE_TIME TRUNCATE PARTITION part1

  >
  Is there a table-level lock while truncating the parition?
  >
  No - it will lock the partition being truncated.

  Is there a global index on the table? If so they will be marked UNUSABLE and must be rebuilt.

  See the VLDB and partitioning Guide
  http://Oracle.Su/docs/11g/server.112/e10837/part_oltp.htm
  >
  Impact of surgery Maintenance of Partition on a Table partitioned local index
  Whenever a partition maintenance operation takes place, Oracle locks the partitions of the table concerned for any DML operation. Data in the affected partitions, except a FALL or a TRUNCATION operation, are always fully available for any operation selection. Given that clues them are logically coupled with the (data) table partitions, only the local index partitions affected table partitions must be kept as part of a partition maintenance operation, which allows the optimal treatment for the index maintenance.

  For example, when you move an old score a level of high-end storage at a level of low-cost storage, data and index are always available for SELECT operations. the maintenance of the necessary index is either update the existing index partition to reflect the new physical location of the data or, more commonly, relocation and reconstruction of the index to a level of storage partition low cost as well. If you delete an older partition once you have collected it, then its local index partitions deleted, allowing a fraction of second partition maintenance operation that affects only the data dictionary.

  Impact of surgery Maintenance of Partition on Global Indexes

  Whenever a global index is defined on a table partitioned or not partitioned, there is no correlation between a separate partition of table and index. Therefore, any partition maintenance operation affects all global indices or index partitions. As for the tables containing indexes, the affected partitions are locked to prevent the DML operations against the scores of the affected table. However, unlike the index for the local index maintenance, no matter what overall index remains fully available for DML operations and does not affect the launch of the OLTP system. On the conceptual and technical level, the index maintenance for the overall index for a partition maintenance operation is comparable to the index maintenance which would become necessary for a semantically identical DML operation.

  For example, it is semantically equivalent to the removal of documents from the old partition using the SQL DELETE statement to drop old partition. In both cases, all the deleted data set index entries must be removed to any global index as a maintenance operation of normal index that does not affect the availability of an index to SELECT and DML operations. In this scenario, a drop operation represents the optimal approach: data is deleted without the expense of a conventional DELETE operation and the indices are maintained in a non-intrusive way.

• Help. How to lock a line under a shape so it will automatically extend when you drag the shape?

  How to lock a line under a shape so it will automatically extend when you drag the shape? I can't figure out how to turn this feature on and outside.

  Maybe it's what you've done I didn't read all the post in the thread so if someone already mentioned what they give you the path.

  http://www.wadezimmerman.com/videos/connectors.mov

• How to find level locks table

  Oracle APPS R12
  
  Hi all
  
  How to determine the table level locks in oracle Apps R12. When I run my simultaneous program its taking too much time to complete, and two or three concurrent programs are running in parallel and taking the same base table data, so how to find the locks if it is on the table. Any help is highly appricatable.
  
  
  Thanks and greetings
  Srikkanth.M

  Hello

  How to determine the table level locks in oracle Apps R12.

  Please see old similar threads.

  Table locks
  http://forums.Oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=table+locks&objid=C3&DateRange=all&userid=&NumResults=15&rankBy=10001

  When I run my simultaneous program its taking too much time to complete, and two or three concurrent programs are running in parallel and to the same base table data

  Are these concurrent programs custom or seeded? You're correctly concurrent managers? Please see these documents for more details.

  A comprehensive approach to the performance of Oracle Applications systems [ID 69565.1]
  What is the size of "Cache" recommended for a Manager Standard [ID 986228.1]
  Troubleshooting problems of performance in the Oracle Applications / E-Business Suite [ID 117648.1]

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Solution campus 9.0: security at the level of the line - duration of the recording of a search process

  People,

  Hello. I implement 9.0 Solution on a University Campus. I faced a problem as below:

  Navigator:
  Campus community
  -Personal Information (student)
  -Add/update a person > Search EMPLID

  I can enter new information of a person in the system and save successfully. All the information of the people returned to the level of the SQL database > successfully. But in the browser, click on "Search", it returns "no corresponding value found.

  I followed the tutorial http://peoplesoftconcept.blogspot.com/2014/03/row-level-security-views-as-search.html review of research PEOPLE_SRCH (view) for the SCC_BIO_DEMO component. GBL step by step as below:

  Step 1:

  Check them that whitelists has been entrusted to the PS of the user on the user profile page below:

  Navigator PeopleTools > Security > (PS) user profile > general page

  There are 4 predefined whitelists:
  Browser home page: HCSPNAVHP
  Profile of the process: HCSPPRFL
  Elementary school: HCPPALL
  Rank of security: HCDPALL

  Step 2:
  Check security game and the Type of security access to the list of security permissions line HCDPALL as below:

  Navigator SetUp HRMS > Security > security level line Core > secure by the permissions list

  Whitelist: HCDPALL
  Security set: PPLOI (Description: unemployed people)
  Type of security access: 009
  Key 1: 00000-00007, 00008, 00009, 00010

  SQL > Select CLASSID, SCRTY_SET_CD, SCRTY_TYPE_CD, SCRTY_KEY1 from USER.PS_SJT_CLASS_ALL where CLASSID = "HCDPALL";

  His output: 42 selected lines. Type of security access 00009 has 5 ranks as below:

  HCDPALL PPLPOI 00000-00009
  HCDPALL PPLPOI 00009 00007
  HCDPALL PPLPOI 00009-00008
  HCDPALL PPLPOI 00009 00009
  HCDPALL PPLPOI 00009 00010

  Step 3:
  Check if these types of security and the security of key1 access access EMPLID.

  SQL > select EMPLID in user.PS_SJT_PERSON where SCRTY_TYPE_CD = '009 ' AND SCRTY_KEY1 = ' 00000';

  Its output:

  0075

  0076
  

  SQL > select EMPLID in user.PS_SJT_PERSON where SCRTY_TYPE_CD = '009 ' AND SCRTY_KEY1 = ' 00009';

  Its output:

  0064
  0065
  0066
  ...

  There is no selected line for SCRTY_KEY1 '00007', '00008', "00010".

  The above output means Permission list HCDPALL, set of security PPLPOI security type 00009 and security access key1 00000, 00009 to have access to all of the EMPLIDs. Thus, the outputs above must return in the browser browser:
  Campus community
  -Personal Information (student)
  -Add/update a person > Search "EMPLID.

  The problem is that the output above does not return in the browser browser:
  Campus community
  -Personal Information (student)
  -Add/update a person > Search "EMPLID.

  I see no error to find record PEOPLE_SRCH (view) running the process. I can't understand why the output does not return in the browser "Find" EMPLID.

  My question is:

  Is that what you would you please run the 3 steps above in your machine and to understand why the output does not return in the browser "Find" EMPLID?

  
  Thanks in advance.

  
  

  People,

  Hello. The problem is solved by myself.

  The thing is that we can get the information of a person into the system and return it as a person. But if we want to return as a student, the person needs to have registration and registration information. If the person is not admitted or not save you no matter what class, may not be back as a student.

  Thank you.

• BI Publisher data level / security at the level of the line

  I would like to know how we can give data level or line level of security defined in BI 11g Publisher.  If you have any best practice document/link, please provide.

  Don't know if you have already activated

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-Publisher/overview/WP-Oracle-BIP-row-level-security-132091.PDF

• How to lock monitor Adobe (emission of mercury associated with)

  I have installation AE to my current computer to a TV (Adobe Monitor 1). I want to do is keep a model specific to the TV while I change one of its comps in a separate window on my computer screen comp. With mercury pass, the image transmitted on television is still tied to my selected calendar.

  Normally when I work with two comps, I lock among the viewers of the model so that the AE pass the image when I pass a calendar to change the demo. I would like to be able to lock the model transmitted on television, so that I can change the demo on my primary monitor and see the direct differences on the computer on the TV.

  Is it possible and if yes, how can I do?

  This is possible in after effects CC 2015. You can "lock" a specific composition for external video preview by clicking the switch Viewer in the lower left corner of the Composition Panel. This switch also blocks the audio output of this composition.

  The switch Viewer is new in after effects CC 2015. After effects CC 2014 and earlier versions, the switch always found this view (also in the lower left corner of the Composition Panel) will act as the "lock" for the external video preview, in addition to its standard to choose what view of composition to use when you start a snapshot. In after effects CC 2015, now you can separately control these behaviors.

• Connect by level - with several lines of inpur

  Very simplified, I have this table - it has a 'table' as a variable-length structure.
  
  I need x line of output for each input line (do not use pipelining og PL/SQL function)
  Wih a single line as input of the "log in"-it works of course.
  

  drop table test3;
  create table test3 (id number, tekst varchar2(20));
  
  insert into test3 values (1, 'acbdef');
  insert into test3 values (2, '123');
  insert into test3 values (3, 'HUUGHFTT');
  insert into test3 values (4, 'A');
  insert into test3 values (5, 'AKAJKSHKJASHKAJSHJKJ');
  commit;
  
  with tal as
  (
  select * from
  (select a.*, rownum rn
  from test3 a)
  where rn < 2)
  ------
  select tekst, level , 
  substr(tekst,(level-1)*1+1, 1) content
  from tal
  connect by level < length(tekst) 
  ;

  How to achieve the same thing for several input lines?
  I know I can do it in PL/SQL using plan either pl or just a function in the pipeline, but I prefer a clean if possible SQL.
  I tried to do in a cross join test3 and (select different values of double the test3 table) and other versions, but all with syntax errors
  

  with tal as
  (
  select * from
  (select a.*, rownum rn
  from test3 a)
  where rn < 3)
  ------
  select * from test3 cross join table 
  (
  select tekst, level , 
  substr(tekst,(level-1)*1+1, 1) content
  from dual
  connect by level < length(tekst)
  )
  ;

  Oracle version will be 10.2 and 11 +.

  I think it's kind of what you're looking for:

  with tal as
  ( select 1 id, 'acbdef' tekst         from dual union
    select 2   , '123'                  from dual union
    select 3   , 'HUUGHFTT'             from dual union
    select 4   , 'A'                    from dual )
  ------
  select  id, tekst, level, substr(tekst,(level-1)*1+1, 1) content
    from  tal
  connect by (    level <= length(tekst)
             and  prior id = id
             and  prior dbms_random.value is not null
             )
  ;
  
          ID TEKST         LEVEL CONTENT
  ---------- -------- ---------- -------
           1 acbdef            1 a
           1 acbdef            2 c
           1 acbdef            3 b
           1 acbdef            4 d
           1 acbdef            5 e
           1 acbdef            6 f
           2 123               1 1
           2 123               2 2
           2 123               3 3
           3 HUUGHFTT          1 H
           3 HUUGHFTT          2 U
           3 HUUGHFTT          3 U
           3 HUUGHFTT          4 G
           3 HUUGHFTT          5 H
           3 HUUGHFTT          6 F
           3 HUUGHFTT          7 T
           3 HUUGHFTT          8 T
           4 A                 1 A       
  

• lock monitoring every second

  Hello
  
  is it possible to make a script that will monitor the lock on objects and remove this lock?
  
  my general script that will follow the lock must be:
  

  SELECT DISTINCT dbw.holding_session, fu.user_name apps_user, fu.email_address "Email", vs.username, vs.process "Client Process",
  vs.sid "DB SID", vs.serial# "DB Serial #", vs.MODULE "Module", vs.action "Action", vs.logon_time "Login Time", vp.spid "Server Process"
  FROM v$session vs, v$process vp, fnd_logins fl, fnd_user fu, dba_waiters dbw
  WHERE vp.addr(+) = vs.paddr
  AND fl.spid(+) = vs.process
  AND fl.end_time(+) IS NULL
  AND fu.user_id(+) = fl.user_id
  AND vs.sid = dbw.holding_session;

  now I need to issue the spid $kill-9
  
  I want to put everything in one or two sql script and put them all in a package.if dbms_job scheduling it is possible then how to achieve that?
  
  DB 10 g 2, OS rhel 5.5 32 bit.
  
  rgrds

  Study using DBMS_SCHEDULER to run an external shell script with parameters.

• my hp 2009f poster the power button locked monitor

  the screen power not turns off key lock. its very difficult to use the system

  You can try to hold the power button on off for about 30 seconds, while it is turned on.

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/desktop-lockups-freezes-hangs/power-button-lockout/TD-p/59866

• The implementation of the exclusive line locking in Oracle

  Hi all
  
  Since the beginning of learning Oracle, I've known that oracle has no row-level lock. Row level locking is achieved by ITL in the header of the block.
  In this context, I am curious how statement "lock table in exclusive mode of line" is implemented? Update for all ITLs lines all the blocks belonging to the table?
  
  Best regards
  Leon

  I'm not sure what you mean by Oracle has no blockage at the level of the lines. Line level Oracle most certainly is a lock. A single line in a table can be locked without blocking the other lines of the table, or even of other lines in the same block.

  You are right that this works through the ITL. When a DML is run, if a session doesn't has not already open transaction, Oracle will create one, by booking a slot/segment/wrap in the rollback segment header. Then, in the block where the line should be blocked, an ITL slot is reserved in the block header, that contains this transaction id, essentially pointing to this location of rollback segment. Now, to lock a specific line in the directory of the line, there is a byte of the lock. The locking byte is either 0, which means that the row is not locked, or she will 1.n value, where n is the number of ITL sites reserved in the block header. Thus, if the locking byte is not null, it points to slot ITL of the transaction that holds the lock. So, you can see that it is very easy for a transaction lock a single line in a block, or all lines in the block. Simply set the byte corresponding to the ITL (s) appropriate locking.

  This fact implies, it is that Oracle has no "centralized list of the locks on level line. Row-level locks are inherent in the structure of datablock, as stated above.

  Hope the helps to clarify your understanding.

  -Mark

• Conversion of a microphone to a level signal level signal line.

  Friday, June 24, 2016

  Re: My computer: Mac mini (mid-2010)

  The model number is A1347

  Very well. I wonder if the community of Apple Support can help me with this problem.

  I bought a version a SADES 810 Gaming Headset which is supposed to be compatible with Mac in 2016. I tried to plug the headphones on my Mac mini in the hope that I would be able to have conversations using a magic Jack. While I hear people talking to me perfectly clear with the magic Jack, they did not intend to talk into the microphone of the headset.

  I tested the helmet with a chip "phone and the microphone and the headphones worked well." Thus, the microphone is not defective. I discovered that my Mac mini to model requires a microphone level line. The microphone on the "2016 new Version for PS4 SADES SA - 810 Gaming PC Headset Headset" is not level line, it seems, but the lower level of the microphone. Thus, the microphone of the headset is not turn off force, that he needs to work in making the Mac mini line level microphone.

  On a site I saw this quote:

  "Mic Level is the amount of signal you get a microphone. It is much lower than the level of the line and therefore need to be stimulated by a preamp to be usable in a recording situation. »

  What I need is the gadget that will allow me to connect the microphone level 3.5 mm headphones microphone, on my Mac mini, which will convert then the microphone level low in a line level signal, when plugged (at the level of the line) microphone jack/plug of the Mac mini. Is there such a gadget?

  T he one or two 3.5 mm Sockets?

  The headphone jack on the Mac should include a contact for a microphone. To check see it:

  How to use the Apple earphones with remote and mic with your Mac - Apple Support

• AP INVOICE approval line level

  Hi all

  My business requirement must have AP invoice approval of line level based on the applicant at each level of the line.

  I created the approver group which will be applicant ID of all the invoice lines. I joined the line level, rule.

  When launch approval, fires of workflow for the first line, and after the applicant approves the first line, the workflow triggers the process for the second line.

  (1) However, our requirement is to launch when the approval, the approval process should trigger for both lines (line 1 and line 2 in this case) at the same time.

  Please help how to achieve this goal through the installation of the SOUL.

  (2) as only one matching row details must be sent to the respective applicant when sending the notification of the approval.

  For example, the line 1 / amount USD 500 / applicant's name: ABC

  Line 2 / 200 USD amount / applicant's name: XYZ

  As of now the details of the two lines will ABC and XYZ when we need to send only line 1 with 500 USD to ABC and Line2 with 200 USD to XYZ.

  It would be really great if we get a quick response on this. Thank you very much!

  Thank you

  Partha

  I don't think that is possible with current/seeds of invoice approval workflow design.

  Approval parallel for invoices of purchases is a new feature in 12.2.4 and may be extended to the return of 12.1.x by applying the hotfix referenced in this document:

  R12: New feature approval parallel processing invoices (Doc ID 1904137.1)

  However, the new invoice approval workflow currently supports parallelism at the header level only

  Concerning

• Enter data, lock and hide line in the form of web

  Hello
  
  I now use Hyperion 11.1.2.1.
  
  I created the web form "New loans", and I need to get a certain amount on line "Average life span within one month" and lock and hide that particular line. The columns are periods of time ranging from Jan to Dec. I need to enter the fure 1000 for each month and keep it static and lock this line and hide so that branch office users can mess with it.
  
  How can I do this?
  
  The layout of the web form is as follows.
  
  Columns - time periods (dimension)
  Lines - accounts (dimension)
  Versions of pages - years, (dimension), products (dimension), group (dimension)
  POV - scenarios (dimension), POV (size)
  
  Appreciate everyone's help
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: airwolf86 on July 25, 2012 23:25

  Hello

  You can also had a particular line.

  Select the line, you need to hide, and then in the option right pane you can see ' * properties Row: . " Select hide and this particular line would be hidden.

  I hope this helps.

  Concerning
  -SM

  Edited by: 918547 July 26, 2012 12:52

  Reference: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/hp_admin_11122/frameset.htm?form_lay.html
  You can hide individually hide columns and lines