Levels of raid Volumes Compellent

Similar Questions

• ESXi 5.0.0 not recognizing a RAID Volume on LSI MegaRAID.

  Hello

  I have a C220M3 with 9266-8i, LSI MegaRAID SAS controller. I used the utility MegaRAID to create a RAID volume, which appears as a virtual drive 0 in MMIC. My ESXi 5.0.0 installation (on flex flash) does not recognize this volume and I can't use it as a data store.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Joey

  Try to use the installation program OEM customize for Cisco as a CD installation virtual image using KVM or, Alternatively, you can burn it to a CD:

  https://my.VMware.com/Web/VMware/details/esxi50/dHRAYnQldGViZHAlJQ==#drivers_tools

  Zaira

• drives no raid after installing a new hard drive, deleted a raid volume.

  I recently installed a new hard drive on a dimension 9200. One of the two hard drives in the pc has been a failure. After installing a new drive, I had a working old drive and a new drive, I installed vista on the new drive and found I couldn't see the old drive in the computer, also the raid volume was always the same that before removing one of the old disks. After you delete the raid volume, I have now two non-raid drives. My pc would be better if I change those two to a Raid volume as were the two previous albums, and if yes, how can I do.

  
  

• two profiles/levels of audio volume for headphones vs built-in speakers like Macbookpro

  Hi all

  As in my macbook pro, can I make the computer don't forget the volume for headphones and speakers integrated levels?

  Headphones: 10 volume, volume integrated speakers 25 etc. If I remove the headphones, the volume is expected to increase to 25 and when I put headphones, it should decrease by 10 new... ! is not necessarily 10 and 25, it's just to get an idea... !

  Nevermind, it works like that already, cannot remove this question well.. !

• ESX 4.0 shows less available space on a RAID Volume as full size

  Server configuration:

  VMWare ESX 4.0.0 Update 1

  Mother SATA superMicro SuperServer 6025 B

  Intel E5405 2.0 GHz CPU quad-core 64-bit

  8 GB OF DDR2 ECC RAM

  GCCA 9690 3Ware storage controller - SA with the latest firmware (which

  supports VMWare 4.0.0 Update 1) and installed the ESX drivers.

  Disks 0 and 1 are 1 TB disks.  2-5 drives are 2 TB disks.  2 TB disks

  have already been used with Windows and has the GUID partition table, but now

  I want to use with VMWare.  It causes me problems I think.

  I created a volume of RAID1 1 TB of drives 0 and 1 and installed

  VMWare on this, and my first data store is on the remaining space on this

  volume.  I then created a RAID10 volume out of the 4 drives for 4 TB

  total space.  It's initialization through initialization in the background is

  immediately available via the controller.

  I tried to create a store of data on this volume. I had various

  complaints from the GUI, including "unable to get the partition information.

  and "object is not set to an instance of an object" I tried to click

  my way through.

  I did a little research and saw an article on how to create partitions

  manually.  But fdisk was complaining about the GUID partition tables, and

  even after I created the partition and restarted I wasn't able to find a

  device in VMFS to create the file system on.

  So I thought I would blow the entire partition table, so I used "dd".

  to kill the copies of the partition GUID in beginning and end table

  of the disc.

  Now ESX not be complaint, but it is said that the capacity of the disk is

  3.64 TB and TB 1.64 is space.  However there is no

  table partition at this point and "fdisk-u/dev/sdb" shows the full

  capacity of the volume.

  What I am doing wrong?

  ESX (i) can't stand no bigger than "2 TB - 512 Bytes" lun.

  What you need to do, is to divide your RAID and attend smaller LUNS ESX host.

  See Configuration Maximums

  André

• VMware ESX does not recognize the local RAID volume

  Hi all

  We are running VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3 on a G4 HP Proliant DL 380 with a Raid Smart Array 6i controller (this is our test platform).

  Since the VI Client, it is not possible to add a data store that corresponds to a local 200 GB Raid5 volume.  I can see this disc in the "Storage adapters" section (path: vmhba0:1:0, LUN ID = 0).

  We have updated the firmware on our server is no problem of conformity between VMware ESX and such old material?

  Thank you very much in advance for your help

  Connect directly to the server and try to create this VMFS volume?  I noticed on VC 2.5 that whenever I have create a server and try that he does not see the space when I try to add storage.

  Direct connection to the host ESX with the VI Client works every time...

• Volume of the voice channel Windows 7 very low, all levels of thin volume.

  Hello

  I have problems with a recent installation of Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit.

  Problem:
  All the sounds of voice work, but they have a very low volume. I tend to have to reduce all the other audio almost minimum, then come out the volume of the voice, the speaker volume and mixer Volume volume even hear max.

  This is true in games, both running in and out of the compatibility mode. This also applies to Windows Media Player videos and games in the browser and video in Firefox. It's even true in the unit.

  Tried solutions:
  On other forums, similar problems of some other people:
  -a suggested that I have turn off the cancellation of the vote under Kaeroke in sound effect Manager, it is already disabled.
  -a suggested that I put CP > Sound > Communications tab > in the 'status quo', no effect.
  -tried reinstalling the drivers, once again, no effect.
  -A forum suggested to another with the same question that he installed 64-bit windows 7, is not viable as 64-bit installs (despite the fact that I'm on Ubuntu 64-bit.)

  History:
  Previously, in windows XP SP3 it worked well, as it does now on Ubuntu 9.04 (Dual Boot)
  The change seems to have occurred at the same time that the installation of Windows 7.

  System:
  OS: Windows 7 build 7800 Ultimate.
  DirectX: 9.0
  Audio driver: Realtek AC 97 Audio (R) to Audio VIA controller. Version 6.0.1.6305 (current version)

  Please let me know if you need additional information or have any suggestions on how to solve this problem, it is quite frustrating.

  Thank you for your time.

  There has been no updated drivers since, however... I don't know how it works, but somehow update on the side of my computer of 9.04 ubuntu 9.10 seems to have fixed...

  No idea how it worked, I have made no other changes to system register windows virus definition facilities.

  Weird.

  Anyway,.
  Thank you for your time.

• After extending local RAID volume, additional space is not less add storage

  I have a Dell PE2900. It has 6 x 300 GB disks in a RAID5 volume.

  The other night, I added 2 extra 300 GB drives for the server, and then using OpenManage, I added these disks to the existing RAID5 volume. At the same time, I decided to convert it to a RAID6 volume. It's a converted / rebuild / not destructive process.

  It completed OK (took 2 days to get in the background).

  All of the above tasks were conducted with the ESX Server turned on and operation of the virtual computer. No problem here.

  When I look at my data stores, the is original VMFS volume 1.36 TB.

  When I go to the storage cards section and select the Dell PERC 6 / i adapter, I see 2 volumes of x. One of them is 1.63 TB LUN and the other is 278 GB.

  When I return to my data warehouses, I select the TB VMFS 1.36 and select Properties.

  In the new window, it shows (see screenshot):

  1.63 TB capacity

  Primary partitions: VMFS 1.36 TB

  If I click the button increase here, a new window pops up, but additional 278 GB DOES NOT appear here (window is empty, select No and click Next).

  If I try to add a new VMFS volume, the additional GB of 278 also appears (window is empty, select No and click Next).

  I haven't restarted the ESX Server again... downtime, I wish I had time for.

  Does anyone know of a way to make the ESX Server use the new free space on the disk?

  VCP3 32846

  VSP4 VML-306798

  What do you mean by VD? Virtual disk?

  Yes

  In the screenshot I provided, however when I try to add a measure is no free additional space available to add?

  If there is free space on the SAME logic (or VD) unit number you must use the function growe.

  Or use the CLI vmfstool.

  André

• Size of the RAID Volume?

  I'm new to working with large disks bays and would like some perspectives on the size of the volumes of people together to the top and use.   With disks of 3 x 2 TB in a RAID3 table on a controller from Areca 1880, I have the possibility of a large set of volumes (all 4 to) or several smaller Volumes.

  Regarding the configuration of the volume sets, I have the following thoughts on the use of a large single volume:

  • He might end up with a structure to file complicated over time
  • It should always be for Diskeeper to defrag and maintain

  My main goal is to use the wide range of storage/output files - o/s and zero will have on others, separate physical drives.

  Thank you

  Bill

  Bill,

  Whatever Disk Defragmenter, you use, it will take the same amount of time, or even more, when you have several sets of volumes.

  With the help of games of different volumes is as single Disk partitioning, it will not take anything besides more wear and slower perrformance. You have a unique small Bay 4 TB, then, what is the difficulty to keep it organized? I have a table of 10 TB and no problem now organized.

  My advice: use a set of simple volumes.

• "RAID volume is degraded. Dimension E510

  I have a Dell Dimension E510, running Windows XP Media Center, I bought in November 2005.

  I now have a permanent error message on a pop-up from Intel.  He said that "a hard drive is missing; the system works normally.  However, data protection is no longer available. »

  He said as I should be able to rebuild the volume on a disk hard nine, but when I try to do it tells me that 'the hard drive replacement lack of ability to use to rebuild the volume'.

  I tried to restore the system using Norton Ghost.  That worked, but does not solve the problem.  Is this likely to be a hardware problem?  What else can I try?

  TIA!

  
  

• Ultra 2 - RAID 0 volume is not expanding

  Hi all

  My apologies in advance if this is covered elsewhere, but I don't the have not found.

  I have a Ultra-2 with Frontview 4.2.26 (I think it's correct, he is not in front of me now, but this is the last).

  I use the disks out of the HD compatibility list.

  I used (1) 3 TB drive in a Raid 0 configuration. Now it's time to add another drive and I bought a 4 TB drive listed in the HCL (Western Digital Red, as the first).

  I'm ok with the Raid 0 configuration because the contents of the disc is automatically backed up on a Cloud Computing service and works well.

  What I wanted to do (or was really hoping would happen), is the addition of the new disk would seem logical and just more disk space for my existing volumes to extend to the. (I have 3 actions: audio, pictures, video).

  However, I not give me this option in Frontview.

  I appreciate all the advice that my reading of the literature seems to indicate that this is possible.

  Best,

  Stu

  Hi ssands,

  Welcome to the community!

  If the RAID volume is set to 0 and you started with one (1) disc and intend to add a new, there is no other way but to save data and reset the system with both drives installed.

  Kind regards

  BrianL
  NETGEAR community team

• Satellite A200 - 1 M 8 - fickle volume level changes

  HIII

  Need help with Realtek HD audio manager _volume level_ littile controller

  Toshiba Satellite A200 - 1 m 8 Winxp sp3... I'm not sure my version Manager realtek audio... but updated to the final version available

  When I adjust the level of the volume, the volume correctly level changes in the integrated... but it is transformed into fickle on the first and the third quarter levels in the volume level of program realtek... which is annoying and may not work with...

  I wonder if there is a way to solve this problem

  Thank you...

  In your case, I would check for an update from Toshiba Web site:
  http://EU.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com-online decision-making supported Downloads & => Download drivers

  Also, check if you have all updates (patches) for Windows XP is installed.

• Wave volume control keeps resetting to level lowest

  Volume slider control wave reset automatically level the lowest volume.  Sometimes the cursor moves down, resulting no sound, sometimes the cursor remains stationary with no sound.  Still, I can click on the cursor and its takes a few moments and then turns off.  I checked my drivers and they are the most current available.  I am running Windows XP with SP 3.  Suggestions are appreciated.  Thank you.

  I'm also facing this problem.  It is events actually very predictable.  It occurs approximately every 90 seconds.  VERY... WEIRD!

  Through the "Process Monitor" sysinternals.com program, I traced the culprit to svchost.exe.  When this happens I see a 'RegSetValue"and is defined as follows:

  HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\DeviceClasses\{6994AD04-93EF-11D0-A3CC-00A0C9223196}\##?#HDAUDIO#FUNC_01&VEN_111D&DEV_76D5&SUBSYS_1028040B&REV_1001#4&160BAD3A&0&0001#{6994ad04-93ef-11d0-a3cc-00a0c9223196}\#RearWave\Device Parameters\Mixer\ 2\Controls\ 0\Channel 0
  Type: REG_DWORD, length: 4, given: 0

  HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\DeviceClasses\{6994AD04-93EF-11D0-A3CC-00A0C9223196}\##?#HDAUDIO#FUNC_01&VEN_111D&DEV_76D5&SUBSYS_1028040B&REV_1001#4&160BAD3A&0&0001#{6994ad04-93ef-11d0-a3cc-00a0c9223196}\#RearWave\Device Parameters\Mixer\ 2\Controls\ 0\Channel 1
  Type: REG_DWORD, length: 4, given: 0

  (I guess "Channel 0" and "Channel 1" is ' left' / 'Right' respectively "").

  If I change with Volume control program, 'data' that gets value are a value non-zero.  (Volume min = 0; Volume max = 65536)

  When I check the 'stack' for this event, I see the following.  (This has been exported in a CSV file.  Should be visible in MS Excel):

  'Frame', 'Module', 'Place', 'Address', 'path '.
  "0", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0x6a6cc","0x805416cc","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe.
  "1", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0x2a0f5","0x805010f5","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe.
  "2", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0x1259b","0xa35dd59b","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys
  "3", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0x126bf","0xa35dd6bf","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys.
  "4", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0xf60c","0xa35da60c","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys
  "5", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0xb956","0xa35d6956","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys.
  "6", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0x11c59","0xa35dcc59","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys.
  "7", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0x169f","0xa35cc69f","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys.
  "8", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0x10887","0xa35db887","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys
  "9", "wdmaud.sys", "wdmaud.sys + 0xcca7","0xa35d7ca7","C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\wdmaud.sys.
  "10", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0x181e9","0x804ef1e9","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe
  "11", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0xa982f","0x8058082f","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe
  "12", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0xa2292","0x80579292","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe
  "13", "ntkrnlpa.exe", "ntkrnlpa.exe + 0x6a6cc","0x805416cc","C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe

  Not really sure where to go from here, but it's very annoying! @!!

• Preference of Volume Raid change

  All,

  We are looking to change the raid volume Preferences automatically in specific RAID.  We want to make sure that this change will doesn't have a huge impact on the performance as data is moved slower performance table table.  Any ideas or thoughts on this change would be very appreciated.

  Thank you!

  If you have enough free space, I proposes the PS6100 in its own pool, then move the volumes you need of R10 performance at this pool.

• PowerEdge R310 - expansion of Volume Raid H200

  I have a Dell PowerEdge R310 with the following specifications:

  OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard

  RAID controller: H200

  A RAID Volume: 500GB

  Presentation of RAID: Raid-1

  Basically, what I want to know if it is possible to install a disc more (I want to do a 2 TB drive) to replace the two 500 GB drives and extend the size of 2 TB Raid-1 volume, without losing the current data?

  Hello.

  cbn147

  Basically, what I want to know if it is possible to install a disc more (I want to do a 2 TB drive) to replace the two 500 GB drives and extend the size of 2 TB Raid-1 volume, without losing the current data?

  What you are wishing to perform is targeted for online capacity Expansion (OCE) which is not supported by the controller RAID H200 shouldn't we support re-taggable picture to allow you to upgrade to 2 TB on the same virtual disk (VD) discs. Make sure you have backup of your data. The only option available to you is to remove the existing VD and create another with 2 TB drives. Re-install the operating system and restore your data.