Limits of bandwidth on FCS v1.5

Similar Questions

• Are there limits of 'bandwidth' BlueTooth?

  Do not know if I use the right terminology here

  I have a MBP 15 "of the retina mid-2015.  I am using a keyboard Apple BT, Logitech BT mouse (from the store) and headphones from Plantronics BackBeat Pro BT.  When all are connected, the sound on the headphones stutters.

  Disabling the keyboard for example fix it.

  Are there problems of bandwidth, or some sort of claim of radio frequency, be it, I can fix?  3 devices didn't want that many in today's world.

  All communication channels have limited bandwidth.  The power of the sender to provide "strong enough" and the tolerance of the receiver (keyboards use sporadic interaction) will dictate the concurrency.  And as always... "your mileage may vary."

• Hello, can I ask a question about the limits of bandwidth RTMFP

  Hello, rtmfp downloaded from the node and the download to another node, but the FMS bandwidth bandwidth limits Client.getBandwidthLimit () seems only to limit the bandwidth of the server to the client such as RTMP, request how to limit the bandwidth between the nodes, such as RTMFP. MIKE HELP me THANKS!

  He has no control of bandwidth for P2P network traffic limit.

• Exceptions to the limits of bandwidth

  At MAX in San Francisco, I remember hearing with the permission of Adobe, we could get an exception to the bandwidth limit and the user. How is it difficult to get such an exception?
  
  A bit of history - I am researching different solutions to manage users in a small virtual world avatars could walk in and perform minor actions (jumping, racing, wave, cat, etc.). We are currently seeking around 100 concurrent users. With regard to bandwidth - we don't emit any video or audio. Perhaps using a whiteboard or two. I'm more worried about the limit to the bandwidth by user.
  
  Jonathon

  Hi Jonathon,

  We would be interested to hear more about your use case and what you're trying to do. Please send your application and any additional details at [email protected].

  Thank you
  Fang

• WRT54GS limits bandwidth

  I run a bandwidth test, measurement of the speed from my ISP in Los Angeles with different configurations on speedtest.net.

  My setup is that my PC connects to router Linksys WRT54GS v.4 via a Cat 5 cable, which in turn connects to a modem cable Motorola.

  If I connect my PC directly to the cable modem (bypassing the router) I get this speed:

  

  If I connect my PC to the router that connects to the cable modem, I get this speed:

  

  To be sure, I disabled the wireless and not had a single PC to connect to the router. I even updated the firmware on the Linksys router to the latest version. I always get the same result before and after the upgrade.

  If anyone else has noticed this? The Linksys router limits the bandwidth of my cable modem?

  Maybe it's time for me to get a new router?

  -> Yes, the router, you can handle more than 10 Mbps speed.

  -> No, if you get 20 Mbps in the router... you will not get accurate on the router.

  You can try this...

  Open an Internet Explorer browser on your computer (desktop) wired page. In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press ENTER... Let the empty user name & password use admin lowercase...

  On the Configuration tab change MTU size to 1300, then click on save settings...

  Check if it works for you... If not, I think its time to get a new router.

• How can I find the limits of my FMS on bandwidth 4.5 license and the number of simultaneous connections?

  Adobe apparently felt that making this information difficult to find a way to do this is somehow a good idea.  I need to be able to determine exactly what version of FMS 4.5 license my business uses, and I need to see what are the limits of bandwidth and concurrent connections (RTMP and RTMFP).  How would I be able to find it?  Thank you!

  http://: admin/1111/getLicenseInfo? auser =& apswd =<>>

• Windows 7 download bandwidth is strangely throttled, please help.

  Hi all

  Thanks for reading this.

  Here's my problem. I have my desktop PC running windows 7 Professional 64-bit (authenticated copy) connected wireless to a router connected to a modem cable (Time Warner Cable). I'm supposed to receive 40mbps 5 Mbps upload speed and download speed. This is where it gets strange. My home PC download gets only 2 Mbps but my upload is getting 5 Mbps. I thought it was very strange.

  Here's what I did:

  -J' I brought my laptop to friend, and his link windows professional wireless 7 to 40mbps on my router connection / Wireless even (which suggests that this is my desktop PC which is the problem)

  -My ipad and android phone on speedtests also get 30-40mbps when it is connected to the wireless router

  -J' got a new card wireless (thinking it was the USB dongle) and he's still only 2 Mbps (this is a link Wireless N PCI express - TP-4800)

  -J' tried a connection to the local network through my on-board GB ethernet to the router, still 2 MB/s download, 5mbps download

  -J' have switched Internet Options-> connections-> Lan Settings-> automatically detect the settings off (someone else said that fixed their problem) box

  -J' disabled carbonite, audio, anti-virus (sophos) and many other non-essential services in the services section of the Manager of tasks without result.

  -J' started in the safe mode and still download 2mbps

  -J' tried to add the following registry key based on someone of another experience DWORD32 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE->SYSTEM->CurrentControlSet->services->LanmanWorkstation->Parameters->DisableBandwidthThrottling 1

  -Download less than downloading is very suggestive that something is limiting the bandwidth to download on my PC only... I can't understand what he...

  My desktop PC is an AMD A10 7850 k kaveri CPU with the gigabyte card mother/AMD chipset drivers last A88x - D3h Council, and I tried several wireless and wired adapters and for some reason, it's just this PC. I have sophos AV installed and he was not accused of any threat to this system, nor I web practices to high risk.

  Any help on this would be greatly appreciated! Thank you

  OK... so I think I solved the problem.

  Here's how. I have Accelerator disabled random networks AppEx and wam! immediately improved bandwidth. In fact, I can check the box on and it slows down, uncheck the box and immediately my changes 1-2mbps to 50mbps. No other changes have been made except this one.

  It's crazy. It is supposed to speed things up, but it does the opposite. Mabye it's just with my material, but if it can help someone else, I'll be happy.

• Compress data in order to reduce the bandwidth?

  -What are the data transmitted by the agents on the Server OEM compressed somehow? I have limited available bandwidth and because it appears most of the data being downloaded are in XML format, compression would be an effective way to reduce bandwidth. Can someone give me information on the question of if the agents pass compressed data or how to do?
  
  Are there other ways to reduce or control the use of bandwidth by OEM? Thank you
  
  -TJ

  You can use ssh port forwarding (tunnel) to compress.

• IWeb to...

  Sandbox and Wix seek the best for me so far.

  I had GoDaddy.com to host my Web site and bought my four names of them also. Looks like I'll have to spend GoDaddy also because most of these design programs I like include accommodation.

  EVERWEB.com - software program $80; By one year $ 100-200; did not like their models and no blog page. copy the text and images of iWeb and sticking them in EverWeb. video http://www.everwebapp.com/support/iweb-to-everweb.html seems a bit complicated and very slow. EverWeb supported models of Master, which means that you can design your web site once and apply your site automatically changes to every page of your site. Not sure I like it. In iWeb, I could use different "models on each page if I wanted to.

  SANDVOX.com - program $ 80 a so-called extracted content from Web site... to extract the content of a website in a new document. After you enter the URL of your website, Sandvox will start to crawl into your Web site, consider the main content of each page and create the corresponding pages in your new document to the site.

  If everything is fine once the general appearance and feel is set up (drawing is chosen, site title entered, adjusted, banner etc.), add pages and more content, the major part of a site will have to be rebuilt but sounds like it would be even easier.

  3 choice accommodation: Multi this plan is the "medium term", $144 / year (equivalent to $12 / month), and it also includes a domain name *-in private life. This plan includes more bandwidth (45 GB transferred per month) and storage (10 GB). In addition, using this plan, you can use a single account to host up to 10 websites (with their own unique domain name). All your published sites are within the limits of bandwidth and the ability to plan. Choose this plan if you will host more than one Web site, or if your business or your personal site gets too much traffic for the limits of the single plan, or if you need more storage that includes the unique plan.

  WIX.com program is FREE. the best models, appears simple, similar to iWeb, gives instructions for the transfer.   They have four hosting plans. eCommerce is $192 per year; Unlimited is year $149, and the 'combo' $111. Don't see that much difference except eCommerce probably allows you to sell items. Domain names are free the first year about $10 after that. (recommended for Combo is probably enough) Model and design are related to the hosting subscription, so that you can not take the files to another host and still waiting for the forms to work. Ethnoid said that WiX is mainly for people who want a quick and easy option to set up a site online and who don't know really a lot of web design or sites. (hmmm that's maybe me!)

  Highway Express.com - 4 star reviews on version 6.12. FREE, but seems difficult to me.

  Flux4.com - (recommended by old Toad) $99 - very different to iWeb. "steeper learning curve." is really a professional web site design tool.

  Dreamweaver - $20 a month, $240 per year and you continue to pay $20 for a cost additional months. You can open your Web pages in dreamweaver with the command open from the file menu. But the cost is outrageous I think.

  He had to make a decision very soon.

  Freeway Pro/Express is no harder to learn that many others - you can try demo and download the demo for free.

  Flow is now on 6 stream, but yes, there is a steep learning curve, and it's probably more for those who know something about html/css.

  WiX is NOT similar to iWeb to all.  WiX is similar to other manufacturers online like SquareSpace, etc. of Wordpress.com.  You visit Wix and sign upward and create your site name and it's something like mynewsite/wix.com and you then create your site online and it is then published on the servers of Wix.  If you want you can pay an additional amount and get taken off the power adds, then bind your own domain name for the site that you created here, but yes, you are right in that you cannot move it later and you need to cancel your membership of Wix, if you want to do something different.

  You could take another look at EverWeb because I think that blog pages are intended to be available with version 2, which may already be out soon.

  On all of them, EverWeb is perhaps the best way to go to the ease of use and it is the most similar to iWeb.

  The other alternative is to use the CMS (Content Management Systems) that are Drupal, Joomla and Wordpress, and if you already have hosting with GoDaddy, then you can install these on any field you want with a single click.

  Drupal is a bit more complex, but Wordpress.org is good and there are a lot of good free templates, but you don't have to spend that much to get a nice looking model.

  You don't really need to know the html or css to use the CMS either.

• CarPlay audio quality of the voice when it is connected through the USB port is poor vs Bluetooth on Pioneer AVH-4200NEX

  Hello!

  I recently installed a Pioneer AVH-4200NEX unit, I was super excited to improve my car with the support of CarPlay, and everything works great except for one thing.  When I connect my iPhone (6s +) to the unit via a USB cable and a standard phone call, the audio quality is very bad - hail, very downsampled, and metallic sounding compared to the use of Bluetooth via the unit to pioneer for the same phone call (I'm on LTE, using HD voice, although the quality difference is quite noticeable on the calls not HD and on the 4 G calls).  I looked for an answer to this question, but the best that I can find mention of limited USB bandwidth and try to juggle than the bandwidth for the rest of the CarPlay experience, although I don't buy not because audio via the iPhone connected with USB playback is just as clear that it is through Bluetooth.  So my question is: How can I submit a bug report Apple about this behavior and (b) do you have other CarPlay users also be known this recent problem on a unit of Pioneer NEX (AppRadio included)?  It would be great if this is a bug of Pioneer for which they can release a firmware update, I'm just worried that it is a codec problem specified by the CarPlay, so non repairable.

  Thank you!

  -Seth

  Hello served,

  Thank you for using communities of Apple Support.

  I understand that when you use the USB cable for your iPhone in your car with the audio CarPlay is mediocre. I know how it is important for you to hear your calls clearly. In a situation like this, I recommend the steps described in the following article to help solve the problem.

  Configure CarPlay to use with your iPhone

  Specifically the section to get help:

  Get help

  If CarPlay does not work as you expect, here's what you can check. After each step, try to use CarPlay again.

  1. Make sure that Siri is turned on.
  2. Restart your iPhone and your car. Depending on your car, you can see the CarPlay home screen when you turn it on. If you do not, look for the CarPlay logo on the screen of your car.
  3. If possible, connect your iPhone to a different USB port in your car.
  4. Try a different lightning to a USB cable. Make sure that the cable is certified.
  5. Update to the latest version of iOS.
  6. Check the manual using your car. You may need to install updates of firmware for your stereo.

  See you soon

• Internet provider DOWNLOAD speed vs Airport Extreme

  Hello

  I had download speeds slow on my Airport Extreme for ipad, iPhone and imac.

  I have a modem connected via Ethernet cable to an ac Airport Extreme 802.11 Optimum.

  Ran to the application of speed test on my ipad II (within 5 feet of the airport).

  The results showed that the download is only 2.12mbps and upload is 24.97mbps. I pay for the 50mbps service.

  I tried the same thing by using a new iPhone SE and timed to 22,93 download and upload to 23.95. A little better but still not enough good.

  I contacted Optimum and they ran a couple of tests showing that my modem is online, signals are ideal, there is no loss of data to the modem and there is no failure in the region.

  They recommended connect a laptop directly to the router and without going through the airport. Will try it tonight to see the results.

  Assuming that the connection of the cable between the modem and the laptop is fast, what I can do to improve the speed of the WiFi?

  There is something to put in place at the airport? I guess there will be a reduction in speed between wired devices and WiFi but not this bad. What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support? I have at least 6 or more WiFi sharing schemes and wonder if this is the problem.

  Thank you

  Bob

  Please read using the Diagnostics wireless for you help to solve the problems of Wi-Fi on your Mac - Apple Support.

  What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support?

  Apple recommends 50. I got that three dozen sharing an Apple base station AirPort simultaneously with no noticeable performance degradation.

  The factor limiting the bandwidth will be the most restrictive of what follows, in no particular order:

  • your ISP
  • your local wireless environment, including other interference and competing wireless networks
  • the performance of the client machine
  • out of your control network conditions

  Your AEBS will not limit the bandwidth, but if you have reason to believe that it is, a "hard reset" is the only possible troubleshooting step. On rare occasions, an internal parameter becomes corrupted and this is the only way to fix it. By 'rare', I mean "almost never" and the last thing you should consider, after rule out all other possible causes of poor wireless performance.

• How to Segment LAN/WLAN with TimeCapsule and third party LAN

  Hello

  I have a bit of a delicate situation. I need to speed up my (W) LAN through segmentation and hope that many of you might be able to help here.

  Currently my TimeCapsule connects via its WAN for a FritzBox with DHCP port. 255.255.255.0 subnet / host 192.168.178.1 TC router is turned off (bridge mode). The TC creates a wireless network. The FritzBox connects to the ISP and a lot other customers outside the TimeCapsule.

  The first WLAN TimeCapsule is extended by a second TimeCapsule. A couple AppleTV and expresses the airport are connected in the scope wireless of the 2nd TimeCapsule but far out of reach for first time capsule. Apple network and FritzBox network clients need NOT communicate with each other. It will be even better if they were aware, because there are other AppleTV, printers, servers UPnP, stream movie, etc.

  Thus, the 2nd TimeCapsule acts as a 'bridge' for the internet.

  Now, I want to segment the LAN (W). The main reason is to reduce traffic. The two TimeCapsules to connect with a very low bandwidth, because there are a whole bunch of concrete between the two. Since then, there are a LOT of current traffic, customers and also the internet connection around my TimeCapsules is not responding to most of the time.

  Is it possible to segment the LAN (W) with my first TimeCapsule and create a LAN (W) dedicated?

  Thank you very much for your help!

  I think that you need good QoS or limitation if I read your message.

  Give me real numbers.

  What is the max download and upload becomes your Frtizbox? Many real world real... using ethernet for the Fritzy and anything else using the bandwidth.

  The first link to the TC1 on ethernet should be no problem... but the TC2 wireless link is probably give you mediocre results... and there is very little you can do about it... have you tried or considered using adapters EOP. (homeplug to the United States).

  If you take the link that will help you.

  Segment the network's not going help the problem that I see.

  What model is the Christopher? Is there a QoS limitation or even decent with the limitation of bandwidth?

  You can set IP alias or VLAN on that?

  What model is the TC?

• Question of Orbi Triband

  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Marcokamoto wrote:
  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Hello

  im not sure what you're asking, but as I know there is no bandwidth limiting characteristics on the orbi until what you ask is not possible

  in fact, you won't find bandwidth real limitation of capacity on several stocks apart from cab Gargoyle firmware, asus routers firmwares also make the limitation of bandwidth on some routers, but its not available for the orbi

  Standard QOS is not the limitation of bandwidth as it is just a priority based on the demand system that can not and does not normally do what you want

  -----------------------------

  in the second part of your question what do you by improving your overall speed of WiFi? you're talking about the internet or your actual sync to the system orbi speed

  Pete

• computer laptop 15-r250ne: is the replaceable my laptop gpu?

  If it is not replaceable, is there some sort of adapter that I can buy?

  No, it's hard to tell people, but cell phone video is a fixed thing. The chip is soldered to the card. No way to delete and update. Video output is common now, but I guess that you want something that will run games better. Video output on your generation of equipment is done via USB 3.0. She made that enable the extended desktop monitors to have several external displays. He still runs the same video card and USB 3.0 somewhat limits the bandwidth so not good for games; more for PowerPoint presentations and looking fellows.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• Broad-band spectral scanning ni5660 the disk?

  Hello

  I would use the ni5660 to save the (100 MHz) spectrum broadband on the disk.  I understand the limitations of bandwidth in time real (limitation of SDC to 1.25 MHz, 20 MHz bandwidth total possible if dumped first in the amount of memory on-board), but I do not know the limitations of scanning speed (how long can reset the niTuner to a new Central frequency and is there a risk to damage the tuner by sweeping too fast over a long period of time?).  My interest is the 2, 4-2, 5 GHz (ISM band of about).  I would like to imitate the 5660 demo Panel scanning feature, with a backup to disk option and, perhaps, I have Q data instead of amplitude only.  I'll save is worth a day of HD of the PC data.

  I'm looking for suggestions and code of y to achieve the highest resolution for adjustment of scan rates given.

  Thank you!

  Chris

  Yardov wrote:

  Hi Chris,

  The 5660 OR not is the best equipment to perform this operation. Mainly because the limitation you mention (1.25 MHz DDC). This means that you can enjoy at the maximum rate (64. MECH / s) and then the software will run the SDC operation that could take a long time. Now, there is no need to worry in tunning faster that the material can, the driver will not let you damage the unit and you will be able to get the data you need into pieces. You will then need to concatenate these data.

  The pilot DAMA performs this operation automatically but not the NI 5660 driver. Save all the data for a day would take the enormous amount of time and processing power. I recommend watching some of the latest devices with more bandwidth SDC as the NI PXI-5661 and NI PXI 5663 with respectively 20 MHz and 50 MHz of bandwidth SDC.

  If you have any other questions or thoughts about this.

  Yardov,

  Yes, it's a question of costs.  I have placed a proposal for the 5663, but will not have funding until the summer (or not at all ) and the 5661 would require the purchase of a new chassis SMU anyway.  Thanks for the info on the speed setting!

  Chris