"ListConfigurations" API returns only the "My Library Configurations?

Similar Questions

• Discover with function as datasource returns only the first line.

  Hello

  I created the following function to get the status of all the rules for the instances of SQL Server.

  The data type of the function output has been configured as 'List of SQLInstanceRuleStatuss', where SQLInstanceRuleStatuss is the custom type, I created in the same module.

  When I tested the function, it returns all instances of SQL Server with two other columns.

  But when I try to create a view with the Rows property that is configured to use the feature, it returns only the first line:

  sqlRules = new ArrayList();

  queryStatement = server. QueryService.createStatement ("(DBSS_Instance)");

  queryResult = server. QueryService.executeStatement (queryStatement);

  for (it in queryResult.topologyObjects)

  {

  sqlRule is functionHelper.createDataObject ("westjet_mark_dev:SQLInstanceRuleStatus", "none", "test");.

  sqlRule.instance = it;

  sqlRule.ruleName = 'test rule name';

  sqlRule.status = false;

  sqlRules.add (sqlRule);

  }

  Return sqlRules;

  Did I miss something?

  Thank you

  Mark

  Mark,

  I think I forgot something

  sqlRule=functionHelper.createDataObject("westjet_mark_dev:SQLInstanceRuleStatus","none","test");

  you create the test id

  change your line of

  sqlRule=functionHelper.createDataObject("westjet_mark_dev:SQLInstanceRuleStatus","none",null);

  This should allow the creation of a single object in your loop for

• return only the decimal value

  What function can I use to return only the decimal value of a formula

  (97 * 2.2) / 14 value returns 15.24

  I only want to use le.24

  Salvation is

  Use the formula - INT (formula)

  In the special case above:

  =(97*2.2)/14 - INT ((97*2.2)/14)

  You see two places to the right of the decimal separator in reason to be rounded off to the value real, in the shape of the cell to only show as two decimal places, either by setting the width of the cell close enough to force the rounding of the displayed value.

  Note that if the result is rounded (using the ROUND function) the actual value of the cell will be the rounded value. For the other two cases, the value displayed indicates only two decimal places, but the real value in the cell (and the additional calculations used by referring to this cell) is 0.242857142857144, which could lead to surprises in the results of the calculations downstream.

  Kind regards

  Barry

• How to return to the photo library in iPhoto w / black background?

  How to return to the photo library in iPhoto w / black background in 10.9.5?

  iPhoto-> Preferences-> appearance tab

  Note the cursor to the bottom

  

• My previous photo library has now been replaced by the opening one. How to return to the photo library?

  When I double click on an Aperture library (the app is no longer installed on my computer) Photos repaired and opened it.  My previous photo library has now been replaced by the opening one. How to return to the photo library? Where at - it go?

  < re-titled by hosts >

  You should have several libraries - hold down the option key while launching Photos and check every library in the window select library - you should find the original it

  LN

• Need help to write a MySQL query that returns only the peer matching records

  Because I don't know how to explain it easily, I use the table below as an example.
  
  I want to create a MySQL query that returns only the records that match counterparts where 'col1' = 'ABC '.
  
  Notice the ' ABC / GHI' record does not have a Counter-match ' GHI / ABC' record. This record must not be returned because there is no Counter-Party correspondent. With this table, the ' ABC / GHI' record should be the one returned in the query.
  
  How can I create a query that will do it?
  
  
  ID | col1 | col2
  --------------------
  1. ABC | DEF
  2. DEF | ABC
  3. ABC | IGS
  4. DEF | IGS
  5. IGS | DEF
  
  
  * Please let me know if you have no idea of what I'm trying to explain.

  I wanted to just the results where col1 = ABC, but I already got the answer I needed on another forum. Thank you anyway.

  SELECT a.col1,
  a.col2
  FROM table_name AS a
  LEFT OUTER
  Table_name JOIN b
  ON b.col1 = a.col2
  AND a.col1 = b.col2
  WHERE b.col1 IS NOT NULL AND a.col1 = 'ABC '.

• Process.exitValue () returns only the low byte of the exit code?

  Hi - I am executing a sub-process and then wait until he comes back and then examining the exit code of the subprocedure. The error returns the subprocess is 0xb03, but exitValue() doesn't see that 0x03. Other tests show that if I return my native process 0xbff, exitValue() or waitFor() return only 0xff. I've expanded it as a result of back 0xfffffbff, and of course, the methods of process only return 0xff.
  
  Someone knows what the deal is here? The return type for exitValue() and waitFor() are the two "int", so it seems reasonable to be able to return values to 0xffffffff. Is there a way to set up to prosecute the full int?
  
  Thanks for any idea.

  Exactly. UNIX and Linux that support 8-bit output code. The top 8 bits are reserved for an indication of normal speed.

• By comparing the two records and return only the differences

  Hi all!
  
  Assume the records as follows:
  

  USERID     USERNAME   STREET   CITY   PHONE        
  ---------- ---------- -------- ------ -------------
           1 John Smith Street 1 City 1              
           1 John Smith Street 1 City 1 (31) 234-1234

  UserID is PK on this table. Imagine that this application represents two versions of the same record on a table. This recording was 'day' and the phone field changed from null to "(31) 234-1234'.»
  
  What I´d like to do is to retrieve only (or fields) that changed between these 2 versions of the same record. The idea is to call this query (or process PLSQL) a trigger and save these data on a table. The data returned by the query (or process), on the example above, should be something like:
  

         USERID     USERNAME STREET CITY PHONE        
  ---------- -------- ------ ---- -------------
           1                      (31) 234-1234
  1 row selected.

  If two columns have been modified, (Eg., City column also changed "City 1' to 'city 12'), the return value should be:
  

  USERID     USERNAME STREET CITY   PHONE        
  ---------- -------- ------ ------ -------------
           1                 City12 (31) 234-1234
  1 row selected.

  Any idea?
  Thank you very much for your attention.

  Hello

  What I´d like to do is to retrieve only (or fields) that changed between these 2 versions of the same record. The idea is to call this query (or process PLSQL) a trigger and save these data on a table.

  Looks like you're simply wanting a trigger?

  Something like:

  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER audit_trg
    AFTER UPDATE ON your_table
    FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
  
   INSERT INTO audit_table(userid, username, street, city, phone)
   VALUES(
     :new.userid,
     nullif(:new.username, :old.username),
     nullif(:new.street, :old.street),
     nullif(:new.city, :old.city),
     nullif(:new.phone, :old.phone)
   );
  
  END;
  /
  

• Return only the hits that corresponds to 3 or more keywords in the search string

  I created a Multi context column index that works as expected.
  
  In my application, I would like to be able to search using the following (or similar) string:
  
  "man dog cat tree fetch stick."
  
  And I would like to return only results that contain 3 or more words. That is to say, any result which contained 'man' and 'dog' and 'stick' would be a match, but the results which contained only "fetch" and "dog" wouldn't.
  
  Can anyone think of a way to create such a feature?
  
  Thank you very much in advance for your suggestions.
  
  Andy

  The "accum" operator (shortened - ",") could help here. Accum is set such that several results are guaranteed to produce a higher score than the terms less. He did this in 'zoning' results - if you do a search of accum for two words, then suddenly will always score in the range 1-50, and and two hits will always be in the range of 51 to 100.

  You can so work with your terms of six search, the result will be something like:
  1 Word hit 1-16
  2 words hit 17-33
  3 words reached 33-50
  4 words hit 51-83
  5 words hit 84-100

  So the search for at least three words is: CONTAINS (col, ' man, dog, cat, stick, tree, look for ") 32 >

  See the complete example below:

  SQL> drop table foo;
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> create table foo(bar varchar2(60));
  Table created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo values ('man dog');
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo values ('man dog cat');
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo values ('man dog cat stick');
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo values ('man dog cat stick tree');
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo values ('man dog cat stick tree fetch');
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> create index foobar on foo(bar) indextype is ctxsys.context;
  Index created.
  
  SQL> select score(0), bar from foo where contains (bar, 'man , dog , cat , stick , tree , fetch', 0) > 0;
  
    SCORE(0)    BAR
  ----------    ------------------------------------------------------------
       17    man dog
       34    man dog cat
       51    man dog cat stick
       67    man dog cat stick tree
       84    man dog cat stick tree fetch
  
  SQL> select score(0), bar from foo where contains (bar, 'man , dog , cat , stick , tree , fetch', 0) > 32;
  
    SCORE(0)    BAR
  ----------    ------------------------------------------------------------
       34    man dog cat
       51    man dog cat stick
       67    man dog cat stick tree
       84    man dog cat stick tree fetch
  

  Of course you don't know the terms of research beforehand how many there are, in this case, you'll need to do the calculation, or use a lookup table to understand what are the limits of the partition.

• How can I open a new firefox window when the window open is only the bookmarks library?

  Open a new firefox window.
  Open Bookmarks window
  Close the firefox window that you opened in the beginning and open the Bookmarks window.
  Try again to open a new window of firefox Windows; You can't just; You must close firefox Bookmarks window FIRST, and THEN reopen.

  If the bookmarks library window is open and then displays Firefox still works.

  Open a bookmark, history item or this library folder opens a new Firefox window.

• Return only the records with a string of text that is less than a certain value?

  Hi people,
  
  I'm not sure whether this is possible or not, but worth-
  
  I need to be able somehow output only the lines with the text of a column field less to (because of the arguments) 30 characters (including spaces). I know that I can use CFs Left() function to cut the chain, but I don't want to have words cut off mid-sentence. Therefore, I want to somehow restrict the query to only the records that contain a string of less than 30 characters.
  
  Is this possible?
  
  Thanks in advance :-)

  You can use the length of the db function. It may or may not be named LEN()

  SELECT SomeColumn
  FROM YourTable
  WHERE LEN (SomeColumn)<=>

  Or you can retrieve all of the records and use one of the functions of the chain at cflib.org as FullLeft().
  http://www.cflib.org/UDF.cfm?id=329

• Foreach returns only the first line of a dataset object

  Hello, guys.

  I am having trouble with a procedure in Oracle 9.2.0.1.0.

  I have a query that returns the number of lines, but whenever I try to browse by using a foreach loop, I only get the first line and then the loop is completed.

  For example, here's the query:

  select 
        (
          CASE
            WHEN
              TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'),'DD/MM/YYYY') < DATE '2009-01-01'
            THEN DATE '2009-01-01'
            ELSE
              TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'), 'DD/MM/YYYY')
            END
        ) startdate,
  
  
        (
          CASE
            WHEN
            TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level) -1,'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'),'DD/MM/YYYY') > DATE '2009-06-08'
            THEN DATE '2009-06-08'
            ELSE 
            TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level) -1,'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'), 'DD/MM/YYYY')
            END
        ) enddate
       
      FROM dual
      CONNECT by trunc(DATE '2009-06-08','dd') >= add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','dd'),level - 1)
  

  Who shows me this output:

  STARTDATE	ENDDATE
  01/01/2009	2009-01-31
  02/01/2009	28/02/2009
  03/01/2009	31/03/2009
  04/01/2009	30/04/2009
  05/01/2009	31/05/2009
  06/01/2009	06/08/2009

  But whenever I run this code:

    for rec in
    (
      select 
        (
          CASE
            WHEN
              TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'),'DD/MM/YYYY') < DATE '2009-01-01'
            THEN DATE '2009-01-01'
            ELSE
              TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'), 'DD/MM/YYYY')
            END
        ) startdate,
        (
          CASE
            WHEN
            TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level) -1,'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'),'DD/MM/YYYY') > DATE '2009-06-08'
            THEN DATE '2009-06-08'
            ELSE 
            TO_DATE(
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level) -1,'dd') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'mm') || '/' ||
              to_char(add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','mm'),level - 1),'yyyy'), 'DD/MM/YYYY')
            END
        ) enddate
       
      FROM dual
      CONNECT by trunc(DATE '2009-06-08','dd') >= add_months(trunc(DATE '2009-01-01','dd'),level - 1)    
    )
    loop
      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line(TO_CHAR(rec.startdate, 'YYYYMMDD') || '-' || TO_CHAR(rec.enddate, 'YYYYMMDD'));
    end loop;
  

  I get this result:

  20090131 20090101

  I tried debugging and I checked that the loop runs that once, and then passes the end of loop. I'm doing something wrong?

  Thank you!

  Best regards

  Vinicius

  Try:

  for rec in

  (

  Select * from (select

  (

  CASE

  WHEN

  TO_DATE)

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "jj"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "mm"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), 'yyyy'), "DD/MM/YYYY")< date="">

  THEN DAY ' 2009-01-01'

  ON THE OTHER

  TO_DATE)

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "jj"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "mm"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), 'yyyy'), "DD/MM/YYYY")

  END

  ) startdate.

  (

  CASE

  WHEN

  TO_DATE)

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm') and level)-1, "dd"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "mm"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), 'yyyy'), ' DD/MM/YYYY') > DATE '' 2009-06-08

  THEN DAY '' 2009-06-08

  ON THE OTHER

  TO_DATE)

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm') and level)-1, "dd"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), "mm"). '/' ||

  TO_CHAR (add_months (trunc (DATE ' 2009-01-01', 'mm'), level - 1), 'yyyy'), "DD/MM/YYYY")

  END

  ) enddate

  OF the double

  CONNECT by trunc (DATE 2009-06 - 08 ',' dd') > = add_months (trunc (DATE 2009-01 - 01 ',' dd'), level - 1)

  )   )

  loop

  Dbms_output.put_line (TO_CHAR (rec.startdate, 'YYYYMMDD') |) '-' || To_char (rec.enddate, 'YYYYMMDD'));

  end loop;

  SY.

• Return only the columns with different values.

  Hi all
  
  I am trying to solve a seemingly trivial problem but can't seem to get any clear answer anywhere in any forum. Consider a single table with 5 columns and only two lines:
  

  row_id           first_name         last_name        age            gender
  1                    John                  doe               27             M
  1                    Jane                  doe               27              F  

  Assume that there is no primary key or any other constraint. Also assume that there are only and only two lines of this table. So I need basically a query that, overall above lines, would return first name and sex, because they are only different columns in two lines, as well as their values. Even if I can get sort of column names that are different and that would be enough that I can easily access the values later. It is also important to remember that I may not know the names of the columns in the columns, so basically, somehow, I use user_tab_columns in the process.
  
  Any help appreciated.
  
  Published by: 894302 on May 1, 2013 10:35

  Hello

  894302 wrote:
  The exact release could be just a varchar variable that lists all the columns that have different values with each column name separated by commas. We'll call the query you want as a QUERY. So, if I do something like

  Select the REQUEST of double; Output should be: 'first_name, equality of the sexes. Is this possible?

  In this case:

  SELECT     RTRIM ( DECODE (a.row_id,     b.row_id,     NULL, 'row_id,')     ||
                  DECODE (a.first_name, b.first_name, NULL, 'first_name,') ||
            DECODE (a.last_name,  b.last_name,  NULL, 'last_name,')  ||
            DECODE (a.age,        b.age,          NULL, 'age,')      ||
            DECODE (a.gender,     b.gender,     NULL, 'gender,')
             , ','
             )          AS different_columns
  FROM     rhit_table_x  a
  JOIN     rhit_table_x  b  ON  a.ROWID     < b.ROWID
  ;
  

  Output:

  DIFFERENT_COLUMNS
  ---------------------------------------
  first_name,gender
  

  This assumes that you have really a table, then you can use ROWID to distinguish the lines, since there is no primary key.
  If this isn't the case, you first assign ROW_NUMBER in a subquery.

• Where with to_date returns only the data a month

  SELECT col1, col2 FROM bill WHERE
  trunc (TO_DATE(time_stamp, 'yyyy/mm/dd HH:MI:SS AM') = trunc (TO_DATE('2012/01','yyyy/mm');
  
  This only returns data for the first day of the month data and the need for a month.

  user2002208 wrote:
  Tank (14) and the sample data 20120204103342 and 20120204152550

  IMPERFECT, not professional & fully amateur 'design '!

  NEVER store DATE in the column of type CHAR, VARCHAR2 or NUMBER!

  SELECT col1, col2 FROM bill WHERE substr (time_stamp, 1, 6) = '201201';

• Cursor Oracle return only the last record

  I am a newbie in oracle stored proc. I tried to select data using the slider, but it only return last record. The recording must be greater than 1.
  
  CREATE or REPLACE procedure MySchema.Test (myrefcur on sys_refcursor)
  Is
  
  Begin
  declare
  
  Cursor C1 IS
  
  Select mySerialNum from TableA;
  MyRecord C1% rowtype;
  
  Begin
  Open C1;
  Loop
  Fetch C1 into myrecord;
  When the output C1% NotFound;
  
  Open for Myrefcur
  Select SerialNumB from TableB where SerialNumB = myrecord.mySerialNum;
  
  End loop;
  Close C1;
  End;
  end;
  
  However, it only returns the last record in the list.
  
  Original case *.
  The original code is as below:
  
  1st, I'll need to select a list of ImageSerialNum of ImageSerial
  
  * 1 query:
  Select A.ImageSerialNum from ImageSerial A, ProductionOrder B, Bom C
  Where A.ProductionOrderID = B.ProductionOrderID And B.Assembly_Num = C.Model_Num and
  B.Revision = C.Revision And B.EngRevision = C.EngRevision and
  C.Bom_ID = passInVariable* and C.FactoryID = "7"
  
  2nd, I'll need to check the process of EACH series with the code below:
  
  * Low code a return process for 1 series only.
  
  Select t.processid, t.processname, t.assembly_num, t.revision, t.engrevision of
  (Select p.ProcessID, p.ProcessName, in. Assembly_Num, in. review, in. EngRevision, im.imageserialnum
  Process p, Routesequence rs, Imageserial im, ProductionOrder in.
  Where im. ImageserialNum = SerialNum* and p.ProcessID = rs. ProcessID
  And rs. RouteID = in. RouteID and rs. SequenceID = im. NextRouteSequence
  And in. ProductionOrderID = im. ProductionOrderID AND IM. STATUS OF '0'
  UNION
  SELECT A.REWORKROUTEID AS PROCESSID PROCESSNAME AS B.ROUTENAME, C.ASSEMBLY_NUM, C.REVISION, C.ENGREVISION, a.imageserialnum
  OF IMAGESERIAL A, B OF ROAD, PRODUCTIONORDER C
  WHERE A.REWORKROUTEID = B.ROUTEID AND A.IMAGESERIALNUM = SerialNum*.
  AND A.PRODUCTIONORDERID = C.PRODUCTIONORDERID and a.status = '0') t
  
  After that, I would like to combine the two in 1 stored proc code.

  in this case, you just want to join the two applications to use in the FROM clause
  As I don't have your tables, I created two tables, each representing the results of your queries. Substitute the names of table with your queries

  SQL> drop table master
    2  /
  
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL> drop table details
    2  /
  
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> create table master
    2  (ImageSerialNum varchar2(25));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL>
  SQL> insert into master values ('Serial1');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into master values ('Serial2');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into master values ('Serial3');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into master values ('Serial4');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into master values ('Serial5');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> create table details
    2  (ImageSerialNum  varchar2(25)
    3  ,ProcessID  number
    4  ,ProcessName varchar2(25)
    5  );
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> insert into details values ('Serial1',  1, 'Process1');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into details values ('Serial3',  3, 'Process3');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into details values ('Serial5',  5, 'Process5');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> select m.imageserialnum
    2       , d.processid
    3       , d.processname
    4    from master m
    5    left outer
    6    join details d
    7      on (m.imageSerialnum = d.imageserialnum)
    8   order by m.imageserialnum
    9  /
  
  IMAGESERIALNUM             PROCESSID PROCESSNAME
  ------------------------- ---------- -------------------------
  Serial1                            1 Process1
  Serial2
  Serial3                            3 Process3
  Serial4
  Serial5                            5 Process5
  

  your query will be something like

  select m.imageserialnum
       , d.processid
       , d.processname
    from () m
    left outer
    join (