Low flow on mentioned

Just bought a WRT1900AC router to replace a unit of Netgear.  Have 2 EX6100 of Netgear extenders that connect but do not have very good productivity with new router.

SpeedTest on router - 25mbps downloand, 6.9mbps download.  The two Extenders were 3.4mbps/1.3mbps.

All have the latest firmware and that you have rebooted everything several times.

Placement is key with repeaters\extenders. Signal too much or too little really effects performance.

Tags: Linksys Products

Similar Questions

  • WRT1900AC very low flow

    I am experiencing speed very low flow (cable) on my WRT1900AC. My ISP bandwidth is 70Mbps down and 6 Mbps to the top, if I connect my main POC directly to the modem, I get near these speeds (usually ~ 68Mbps down and 6.1Mbps upwards). When it is connected through my WRT1900AC, uplink speed is fine, but the downlink speed drops to ~ 15Mbps.

    I tried to turn off the two WiFi frequencies and disconnect all other peripheral cable with the same result, ~ 15Mbps in connection speed descendant.

    I have reset the modem (without change) and powered by the WRT1900AC down and upward - once again no change.

    Any ideas?

    Which Service provider Internet do you have? Cable or DSL?
    What ISP Internet Modem MFR. and model # you have?

    Prioritization of media is enabled? Disable it and retest.

    Make sure that you test browser with speed test sites and the location of server different speed for a good overall speed test.

  • AirPort Extreme A1408 (5th generation) low flow on both WiFi and wired

    Hi all

    I have an extreme A1408 Airport (5th generation), which is connected to the internet via a cable UTP (wall plug, the internet provider has its routers in the basement of the apartment building). My plan is to 1000 / 200 MB (down / up - Romanian RCS & RDS, Fib), however, I'm getting averages of 90 / 80 MB speeds on speedtest.net. The best I've ever had was about 180 / 200 Mbps, but that happened once.

    The low speed produce on both WiFi and wired (I have an iMac, a MBP, a 6s iPhone and an iPad Mini that connect through WiFi, on the 5 GHz network and a Mac Mini that is connected to the router), with my wireless devices to full signal strength and connection to 450 Mbps. Since low speeds correspond to the cable wire / WiFi (I expected to the Mac mini to outdo the other, since its on gigabit ethernet), this is not a discussion on how to choose the best channel (I tried auto or manual installation, with it on different channels) or change its placement (this corresponds with the MBP even right next to the router) to get the best reception.

    I tested the connection directly paste the cable in the MBP (via the adapter ethernet of love at first sight) and got 850 / 200 Mbps, then my provider connection works as expected.

    I also changed all cables UTP CAT 5, in order to support gigabit speeds to.

    My AirPort Extreme is on firmware 7.6.4, set up as follows:

    • PPPoE: always on
    • IPv6: link-local
    • Wireless:
      • WPA2 Personal (faster)
      • No network comments
      • the radio 802 mode value. 11A / n - 802.11b/g/n (self)
      • country of Romania
      • tried auto and manual selection of channels 2.4 Ghz and 5 GHz (by analyzing other autour networks)
    • Router mode: DHCP and NAT (NAT Port Mapping Protocol active)

    All iDevices I use are updated to their latest version of the OS.

    Is there something that I am missing? Any ideas?

    Thanks in advance for your time!

    Most likely the problem you see is that Apple has not designed the more practical to work with fiber Internet airport base stations. Although, the 5th generation 802.11n AirPort Extreme can manage, at best, 400 - 500 Mbps of throughput (in bridged mode) via its WAN - LAN interface, you will see about half of this when it is enabled as a router (as yours is.) In addition, if your ISP has their router activated ahead of yours, you can also receive a "Double NAT" error as well.

  • How to lower flow of songs on iTunes12

    Back in my days, I know that we had this option when I tried to transfer music in my iPhone, but there are still?

    If Yes, where can I find this option?

    If not, is there anyone know why they removed?

    Thank you.

    iTunes 12.3.3.17

    iPhone5s 9.3.1

    Kyokyokyo wrote:

    Back in my days, I know that we had this option when I tried to transfer music in my iPhone, but there are still?

    If Yes, where can I find this option?

    Kyokyokyo,

    Yes, the option is always there.  With your iPod connected, you will see on the summary tab:

  • Lower flow display of text in a string indicator.

    I need to display the test in an indicator of the string output, I see the test output

    in a display string, but it just export all text output at the end of the test.

    I want the text to scroll display more is attached.

    Basically, I want to see the output of text in real-time as soon as it is available.

    I saw on the answer to one of the close theme.

    If this is the way, can someone explain further?

    Basically, I don't how I can configure this attribute for my chain indicator mode!

    "If you want the text to scroll as it is.
    added, use the indicator string attribute node to set the scroll
    position. "

    Thank you

    Do

    Yes, as in the example.

  • New Firmaware = low flow and dead player now!

    Have a Sansa Fuze 8 GB, updated to the latest firmware and the volume levels decreased significantly. Now the player will not power even when connected to the PC via USB, nor does it display under load. Its dead

    I live in the United Kingdom and, unfortunately, Sansa give lines of work UK or info on where to get warranty service. I think that not wrong in thinking that Fuze players come with a warranty of 2 years UK?

    Any help as to whats that has gone bad, where can I get help will be greatly received.

    Thank you

    Try to reset the unit. Hold the power, slide the switch on the side in the top position for 20 seconds. If this does not work right away, try for more long (up to 30 sec.).

    The volume of compliance HAD edition and is explained & discussed in many threads already.

    One here is.

    Here is one another.

    But you'll notice that there is also a workaround solution.

  • How to bypass the bad internet connection low flow.

    I have a very bad internet connection and can not download Photoshop. How to get around this?

    use a different connection and download on a usb key if your computer is not transferable.

  • Recording of data at low speed

    Hello

    I am acquiring data through data acquisition. The sampling frequency is 20 k and sample read is 2 k. These parameters satisfies my needs. But the data I save are enormous, because I intend to acquire for hours. Therefore, I would be grateful if somone could tell me how to save data to low flow that is without changing the "sampling rate" or "sample to read." In addition, if I could set the frequency of data backup whenever I have start the aqusition.

    Thanks in advance for the help.

    Which makes it look like your data like, is it rapidly fluctuating or is relatively stable with occasional outliers or? I'm asking because the answer may vary in function resembles what data. Simply "decimation" (each sample X gain) may operate for some data, but then you may miss something 'important' Moreover, if the data is relatively constant, with occasional outliers, then by recording a sample every time that data moves to a set point (the new sample is X amount larger or smaller than the last 'set point') and then by setting new value to this value may work for other types.

  • Creative Cloud Files displays low-resolution Source 1080 p

    I make a low-flow (target 4, maximum 8) 1920 x 1080 H.264 with timecode burned in to the customer for review. This has worked pretty well for me and worked perfectly with the creative feature Cloud Files, until a few weeks ago. The video is now displayed in a window of 500 x 500. It can be downloaded very well, but on the Web site using the public access link (and also the consultation of my connected account) it indicates that this resolution wobbly. This isn't just the viewport, but it also gives that, as the resolution of the source on the details panel on the right side of the screen.

    I just checked a project video that I downloaded on 31 March using the same predefined custom media encoder that displays correctly, but even a video delivery for another client, I downloaded on April 12, which uses the stock Vimeo H.264 preset (even though I have switched on 2-pass VBR) poster in this strange resolution of 500 x 500 , so it doesn't seem as if it was just my delivery of custom project settings.

    Hi Gwhuff,

    We are aware of this problem and our experts are already working on this.

    Would be a great help, you can download a few screenshots.

    You can also check this link:

    Auto resizing of videos to 500 x 500

    We will keep you updated.

    Thank you
    Ilyes Singh

  • variables of user-defined data transfer

    Hello

    I use the etherCAT 9144 chassis and is only supported by this hardware FIFO range target. After a search, I realized that the only way to transfer data from FPGA to the host by using user-defined variables. But these variables do not support the notion of FIFO. So which is the best practice to transfer data after measures (provable 10 Hz measurement of 15 values) to host VI?

    Thank you

    As mentioned, the 9144 only supports the analytical engine.

    In regards to what you do, it really depends on the entire application. For example, what is the master? Are there other systems at issue here? Etc. It's a good read, in general, although it might not help this second right: http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14151/en/

    A high level, you need to decide what you need. If you have need for deterministic communication, low-latency over long distances from a RT controller, the 9144 is probably the right choice. If you need low latency + streaming over short distances to a RT controller, you should look into the RIO MXI chassis. If you need mainly not deterministic low speed (10 hz) data mixed with low flow continuous over long distances to a windows or host RT, then ethernet expansion rio (9146,7,8,9) is probably the right choice. If you need high speed continuous with low control latency over long distances to a windows or RT host, you need a full cRIO controller. Based on what you've posted so far, its uncertain is the right person.

    Lets say you're stuck with the 9144 for now. As you can easily hit 1 kHz scanning cycles, it should be perfectly possible to data 'stream' to 10 Hz. If you run the scan at 1 kHz engine, then you are 100 x oversampling. Where it gets complicated is this requirement of sync. By default, acquisition input/output is synchronized to the clock of the scan (and you can see when the clock of scan is set by a knot of e/s FPGA). However, you can take complete control of a module in the FPGA and read inputs and outputs at any time if you please. In other words, you can set up so when DIO0 goes high you immediately enjoy all the values of AI 15. You can then transfer these values HAVE switched to the host using the user-defined variables.

  • Extremely poor bandwidth WiFi - with Windows only

    I have two laptops running Windows 7. One is mine and is about five years old. The other belongs to my employer and is less than one year.

    Both computers have problems of severe flow with Comcast Internet service and WiFi router in a House to sleep during the work week. My room is one floor above the router, and horizontally, almost on top of it. The windows of the signal strength meter reports four bars. Windows has no trouble to make and maintain a liaison, but the flow is so poor that a simple web page takes several minutes to load, when I can load one at all. With common modern sites such as yahoo.com and ebay.com, the server usually expires before I can load a page at all. I have similar problems with e-mail.

    I tried to use my laptop a few feet away from the router (in the living room of my landlady). Flow was not excellent, but it was good and consistent.

    Last night, I tried to use the same computer in the lobby, about 20 feet from the router and separated by two walls. I had five bars and a very low flow.

    No computer is having problems with the WiFi in my house (also using Comcast) or at my place of work.

    I have a Kindle that communicates slowly but surely my rented room. It reflects the strength of signal as "good" or "fair". Another tenant uses a Kindle in the room next to me and has no problem. My owner use a MacBook and have no problem. She also has an old Windows XP machine which is connected to the router and gets a very low flow.

    So, in summary, two on two Windows computers have severe with this router and only this router flow problems, regardless of the strength of the signal, unless they are literally sitting next to him. A third has problems of large flow with a wired connection. And non-windows devices three out of three have no this problem.

    What happens here? Windows is just particularly poor to cope with real-world WiFi? Or is there some sort of incompatibility between Windows and this particular router or network upstream? How can I identify the problem and how can I solve this problem?

    I am writing this wrap. I bought a TP - Link PA4020P Powerline adapter kit. I chose it because I think that I mentioned in a previous post: a product of brand with many not bad reviews that raised red flags when I read the comments and a rating average high. I also held a direct power connector.

    I connected two adapters to two shots in my room and you press the pairing button. The lights of the fool said that pairing has been successful. I moved a lounge where the modem hangs my landlady, and presto, Instant Internet. After all I've experienced in the last two months, it was rather disappointing.

    I would like to again I knew what was wrong, but since I solved the problem I can't complain too much! I recommend this to anyone in a similar situation, as long as they would be satisfied with a wired connection.

  • Appasure seeding of the process

    I have set up replication and was seeding on a tough usb drive that works well and fairly quickly. This morning he told me that the drive was full, so I plugged another disc and I kept pointing to this new disc. He started, but slowed to 1 Mbps or there abouts.

    Any ideas why this happened?

    Add (again) to the replica of Tim, there are 3 things to look at:

    1. the length of the queue - as mentioned previously

    2 disk IO on the title bar of the disk activity (& green stuff in the graph)

    3. the highest active time - on the title bar of the disk activity. (& blue line on the chart)

    The most important is by far the higher activity time. Is not stuck at 100%, it means that the Player cannot maintain despite the low flow possible. Although whole queue waiting high indicates a bottleneck if the queue is low AND the activity time higher stop 100% (or in that vicinity) indicates that the storage environment is unable to follow.

  • Why waste your DVD before burning is complete?

    Adobe Premiere 9. NAR jeg brenner en DVD loser den nar den har brent 85-95%. Dytter Frohes igjen inn og brenningen fortsetter, men nar jeg spiller av Platinum hakker, butcher og filmen Word slutten fryser. HVA jeg gjor?

    RVS

    Let us examine the situation before considering to Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 to 12.

    Important information to know is what the dialog box burn shows for required space and flow when you have a checkbox next to 'Fit content of available space' just before you click the burn button.

    Just a reminder, the DVD disc labeled 4.7 GB / 120 minutes is actually 4.38 GB, not 4.7 GB. And, if you went to a labeled to 8.5 GB DVD disc / 240 minutes, which is not 8.5 GB 7.95 GB, actually. You say that the space required is 4.3 GB. You are probably the disk capacity or more. If you used 'Fit content space' and you will see a Bitrate less than 8.00 Mbit/s, then the project lowers the flow to make the adjustment. Low flow rate means a lower quality. If this is the case, how low is important. So, what is the speed of transmission in the dialog box burn before you hit button burn here?

    The other factor in front of you, if you do a big project in Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 is computing resources. Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 is going to be an app 32 bit, if it is running in 32-bit compatibility of a 64-bit mode or 32-bit system. That means maximum supported installed RAM = 4 GB on which 3.2 to 3.0 GB or less available.

    In the foregoing, thoughts could be to consider the disc with the DVD double single layer (8.5 GB / 240 minutes) and Premiere elements 10, 11 or 12, which would be a 64 application when run specifically on Windows 7, 8 or 8.1 64 bit... Premiere Elements offers 64-bit resources.

    However, you must decide within or on the content of the timeline and irregularities in there (placement of the transitions, fragments in titles, audio placement, etc.) as well as the requirements of size and resources timeline.

    A very thorough inspection of the extended timeline is important here.

    You said that you were able to burn on record (presumed 'Record 4.7 GB'). If you need your DVD-video on DVD now and burn it on is not yet resolved, you can take the VIDEO_TS folder in the backup folder and bring it to DVD-VIDEO on DVD using the free ImgBurn program (category 'Write the files/folder on drive')

    http://www.Afterdawn.com/guides/archive/burn_dvd_folder_imgburn.cfm

    You don't have to bother with any Audio_TS folder which could be mentioned in the article.

    With all downloads, be careful for your choices during the download and installation so that you don't get unwanted software on your computer while ImgBurn program download and installation.

    If you need assistance with the ImgBurn program, please let us know.

    Use it only if you need your DVD-VIDEO on DVD disc now and burn on doesn't work yet.

    Did you open a new project and as a mini series of tests, tried a burn on a disc with a smaller content of chronology? If Yes, how? If so, then look at the size of the project problem as well with regard to irregularities in the extended timeline.

    We will look for your results.

    Thank you.

    RTA

  • Portege A600-133: DVD player disappears from my computer

    Hello

    I have a laptop Portege A600-133.
    First of all, it is slow at the opening of my computer screen.

    Second: after ejecting a disc dvd or cd, Windows still shows the contents of the disc, the system hangs for a while, a USB unplug sound can be heard and the dvd player disappears from Windows (in my computer / Explorer / Device Manager)

    What this may be?

    I did already the round of upper/lower filters in the registry, but it does not solve the problem...
    I opened the computer laptop and checked the wiring to the dvd drive, cleaned the contacts, supported on the connectors.

    But the problem is still there...
    OS = Windows XP SP3

    Kind regards

    Arjan

    Hello

    My first idea was to remove the upper and lower registry key filters, but it seems that you have already done this.

    Nevertheless, here is a knowledge of MS on the upper and lower filters article mentioned.
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/270008/en-us

    Hmm if the unit is not present in the device manager then this means that the device is not connected or he's dead

    You should check if the ODD (optical disc) is recognized in the BIOS.
    You should also check if it of possible to boot from the bootable CD.

    If this is not possible then it may mean that your WEIRD malfunction

  • ProBook 4520 s - exchange of the wireless network card

    Hello everyone.

    I think the exchange of the wireless network card in my Probook 4520 s, due to the low flow.
    So I searched for a while a 5 Ghz supporting the card and found out that I am only able to get in the "white" cards list working. Then I looked at this page:

    http://h20000.www2.HP.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/document.jsp?lang=en & CC = US & objectid = c02487851 & jumpi...

    These cards can be any, that have been used in 4520 s. Mine (according to the Device Manager) is the Broadcom 4313 802.11b/g/n. This thing only supports 2.4 Ghz. Now, I looked at the list for a 5 Ghz supporting the card. I think that the 802.11A/B/G/N WLAN Intel HMC 572520-001 minicards can operate on 5 Ghz, because I read, that A appears only with maps of 2.4/5 Ghz. I read too, that maps of 2.4 / 5 GHz have 3 antennas, but on this card I only the slots for 2. Is this good? And this card would go into my 4520 s?

    Greetings,

    Colony

    Hi, colony:

    You are right about your statement about the cards being described as A/B/G/N dual-band.

    The best thing to do is look at Chapter 3 of your service manual.

    You can only order one of the cards listed as supported and it MUST have the HP reference on it or it won't work.

    I see only two possibilities for you...

    The 6200 Intel and Broadcom 4322.  Make sure you also get the part # that corresponds to what country you live.

    If your current Broadcom card has integrated Bluetooth, you will lose your Bluetooth capability if you order an integrated HP bluetooth module and probably the cable too.

    None of the dual-band cards have embedded bluetooth.

    Link to the service manual.

    http://bizsupport1.Austin.HP.com/BC/docs/support/SupportManual/c02439213/c02439213.PDF

    Then, you can order a card on the link below.

    If you do not live in the United States, you can change your country at the top of the page to yours.

    http://h20141.www2.HP.com/hpparts/default.aspx?mscssid=6857BCBBC4CD4470B9282F130A563697

    Paul

Maybe you are looking for