LRT214 InterVLAN routing databases

Similar Questions

• InterVLAN routing for S4810 VLT

  Hello

  I just want to clarify things because I get confused all intervlan routing if it is possible to implement if I used VIDEO Lottery devices

  First of all when I configured the VLT field in sweetheart two switches (S4810), I need to have an itinerary for my VLAN

  -what I used intervlan routing is my favorite, but when the peer routing, active in VLT intervlan routing is applicable or supported in routing peers. ?

  -also all configurations of the two peer switches must be identical or same

  • example: when I configured intervlan routing in Peer-1, also, I need to configured intervlan routing in Peer - 2

  I want to have an answer if I need intervlan or OSPF configuration with this problem

  Thank you very much

  BRENT

  This technical guide I think answer all your questions. Yes, you can have VLAN routing enabled on the switches. The guide goes through many examples, including examples of switches that is configured to perform the VIRTUAL LAN routing. It also includes examples of configuration that you can use as a reference.

  http://Dell.to/1wfDl3n

  Let us know if this helps out.

• InterVLAN routing problem

  Hi friends,

  I have a question related to the Inter-VLAN routing. I have 2 switch a 3850 L3 and another is 2960 L2 (Pure L2). I even vlan on both switches and IP routing enabled on switch L3. But not woking switch l3 to L2 Intervlan Routing switching systems.

  Configuration as below:

  L3 switch:

  hostname L3

  !

  IP routing

  !

  pvst spanning-tree mode

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  switchport access vlan 7

  spanning tree portfast

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/2

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/3

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/4

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/5

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/6

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/7

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/8

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/9

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/10

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/11

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/12

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/13

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/14

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/15

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/16

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/17

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/18

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/19

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/20

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/21

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/22

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/23

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  Are connected to the L2 switch

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2

  !

  interface Vlan1

  no ip address

  Shutdown

  !

  interface Vlan2

  IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan3

  3.3.3.3 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan4

  4.4.4.4 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan5

  5.5.5.5 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan6

  6.6.6.6 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan7

  7.7.7.7 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan8

  8.8.8.8 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan9

  9.9.9.9 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  IP classless

  -----------------

  The L2 switch configuration:

  !
  hostname SwitchL2
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  pvst spanning-tree mode
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/2
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/3
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/4
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/5
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/6
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/7
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/8
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/9
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/10
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/11
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/12
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/13
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/14
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/15
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/16
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/17
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/18
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/19
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/20
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/21
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/22
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/23
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/24
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport nonegotiate
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/2
  !
  interface Vlan1
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Vlan2
  1.1.1.2 IP 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Vlan7
  IP 7.7.7.8 255.255.255.0
  !

  -------------------

  Note: I do not have any router.

  When I test the same setting on packet tracer then get error:

  1. the destination IP address is not the broadcast address, and it does not match the IP address of the port. The appliance ignores the packet.

  Please resolev question:

  Kind regards.

  Deepak Kumar

  I think that Reza questions 3 and 4 are more important than questions 1 and 2, but perhaps do not go quite far enough. The two switches to assign certain ports to a vlan specific and use the vlan by default for most of the ports. There are no statements on a switch which create the vlan but only statements that a port must Access a specified VLAN

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  switchport access vlan 7

  On some versions of switches that may be enough to create the vlan, but on other switches, it is necessary to create the vlan before using it. Maybe something like

  VLAN 7

  name server_vlan

  I would ask if the VLAN on each switch existence?

  There is another question in this config. The switches have created more than 3 VLANs (vlan 1 - the vlan by default and vlan 2 and vlan 7.) But the L3 switch configured more than one interface vlan (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9). Without a vlan underlying pertaining to these layer 3 interfaces vlan will not work.

  HTH

  Rick

• [SOLVED] Problem with the ACB and InterVLAN routing

  Hello.

  I have Cisco 3750 G with IOS k9 - mz.150 - 2.SE4 Service of intellectual property. In my network, I have 4 VLANs with 4 internet gateways. I have set 4 static route for each gateways and with PBR to match this static routes. If I use "set ip next-hop" all traffic goes through the specific gateway interVlan routing does not work (I need to because the customers interVlan routing in different VLANS must be), and if I use 'set ip default next-hop', I was incapable of it attributed to Vlan (road-map lan14 not supported based on routing strategies).

  Model SDM is on the road that ip Routing is enabled.

  Here is my config for 2 of these VLANS:

  interface Vlan7
  IP 192.168.7.254 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 107 to
  !
  interface Vlan14
  IP 192.168.14.254 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 114 to
  !
  IP http server
  IP http secure server
  !
  !
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.70.254
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.140.254
  !
  access-list 107 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
  access-list 107 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 114 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
  access-list 114 allow ip 192.168.14.0 0.0.0.255 any

  lan7 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 107
  IP 192.168.70.254 jump according to the value
  !

  lan14 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 114
  IP 192.168.140.254 jump according to the value

  !

  Where is my error in config?

  Please help me, I'm stuck here almost three weeks.

  Hello

  You have created courses 2-card to set the next hop for a portion of the traffic classified with an acl.

  If you want any other traffic manager you must create an empty instance of your roadmap

  Example:

  lan7 allowed 10 route map

  football game...

  map of route allowed lan7 20 ==> Add this instance and leave it empty. You say the switch/router that he must refrain from other traffic but nothing to apply.

  Hope that this clear.

• No "ip Routing" command on the switch and still intervlan routing.

  Hello

  In my companies 4500 switch I see there is intervlan routing configured for 4 VLANS there but I don't see any command "ip Routing" on this subject

  to enable routing on the switch. A switch can route the same if the command is not there?

  Ninja,

  Default configuration options often do not appear in "show run".  Please try «performance see all»

  Kind regards

  Christopher

  PS your switch and device business, not small business.

• Cisco SG300 / ASA 5505 intervlan routing problem

  Dear all

  I have a problem with the configuration correctly sg300 layer 3 behind the ASA 5505 switch (incl. license more security)

  The configuration is the following:

  CISCO SG300 is configured as a layer 3 switch

  VLAN native 1: 192.168.1.254, default route ip address (inside interface ASA 192.168.1.1)

  VLAN defined additional switch

  VLAN 100 with 192.168.100.0/24, default gateway 192.168.100.254

  VLAN 110 with 192.168.110.0/24, default gateway 192.168.110.254

  VLAN 120 with 172.16.0.0/16, default gateway 172.16.10.254

  Of the VLANS (100,110,120) different, I am able to connect to all devices on the other VIRTUAL local networks (with the exception of Native VLAN 1; is not the ping requests)

  From the switch cli I can ping my firewall (192.168.1.1) and all the other gateways of VLANs and vlan (VLAN1, 100, 110, 120) devices

  Asa cli I can only ping my switch (192.168.1.254) port, but no other devices in other VLAN

  My question is this. What should I change or installation in the switch configuration or asa so that other VLANs to access the Internet through the ASA. I will not use the ASA as intervlan routing device, because the switch does this for me

  I tried to change the asa int e0/1 in trunkport (uplink port switch also), to enable all the VLANS, but as soon as I do that, I can not ping 192.168.1.254 ASA cli more.

  Any help is greatly appreciated

  Concerning

  Edwin

  Hi Edwin, because the switch is layer 3, the only necessary behavior is to ensure that default gateways to the computer are set on the SVI interface connection to the switch to make sure that the switch is transfer traffic wished to the ASA.

  The configuration between the ASA and the switch must stay true by dot1q, such as the vlan all other, unidentified native VLAN tagged.

  Also, if I'm not wrong, on the SAA you must set the security level of the port to 100.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• C3750 interVLAN routing - no internet access for customer switches

  I have a stupid question with my itinerary (intervlan).

  I have a test configuration to a stack of C3750 as core and a few 2960's like access switches.

  http://users.fraeco.be/setup.png - switch at the bottom is the new network (VLANNED). The switches on the left is the current network of production (10.1.1.0/24)

  The C3750 to the router is a 30 network.

  There will be 6 VLAN but at the moment I have one configured. VLAN50 - 10.5.1.0/24

  The C3750 I can ping my network current production, internet, other VLANs in the testsetup... Everything.

  Of the C2960 I can ping other VLAN, join the entry door, reach the router, reached the currenct production network. But I can't reach internet. I have configured 'ip default-gateway 10.5.1.254' on the C2960. C3750 relevant config is down below.

  How can I reach other networks connected to the router and the internet not switches to access? I'm trying just to ping 8.8.8.8.

  !

  IP routing

  !

  !

  GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface

  No switchport

  address 172.16.1.2 IP 255.255.255.252

  !

  !

  interface Vlan50

  IP 10.5.1.254 255.255.255.0

  !

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1

  Hi, Maxim,.

  I have no idea about your configuration exactly but for the account information that u as far as I can tell... Configure all the respective host to its ip address vlan respective gateway.

  There should be a static route pointing to the router on the switch of the MLS.

  And also, make sure that it should be static (or entered dynamic in case you use PGI) of all subnets of VLANs pointing to the ip directly connected inverter MLS.

  It will certainly work.

  Thank you

  Amit

  Please rate if this post would be useful.

• Problem of layer 3 of SGE2010 with installing intervlan routing

  I'm new to the switches for small businesses and could use assistance in the configuration of routing for intervlan between several VLANs on the switch. I changed the 3 layer mode and configure the VLAN. When I enter an IP address for VLAN2, I disconnect (VLAN1 ip) configuration on the switch interface and I can't access the switch unless I reset it. I tried several times and each time it has the same. Is there something else I need installation before you configure the ip address for other VLANs?

  Hi Jacqueline,.

  Thank you for your participation in the community of support to small businesses. My name is Nico Muselle of Cisco Sofia HWC.

  This is the normal way for the switch to behave. There are 2 ways to work around this problem.

  1. You assign a port to the VLAN2. After the configuration of the IP address, you connect your PC to this port and make sure that it is in the same subnet as the address IP 2 VLAN.
  2. You assign a static IP address for the vlan by default first and make sure your connected PC is in the same subnet.

  The reason for this behavior is that the switch has its DHCP client enabled, if no DHCP server is available, it will return to its default IP 192.168.1.254 (which I assume that you connect to the configuration).

  However, once you set up a static IP address on the switch, the DHCP client and the default IP address is disabled, which means that the obtained from DHCP or the default IP address 192.168.1.254 are more accessible.

  I would go to step 2, because it's the simplest solution to your problem and you would like a default static IP VLAN in any case, I guess.

  I hope this helps!

  Best regards

  Nico glacier

  Senior Network Engineer - CCNA

• InterVLAN routing - N4000

  Let me start by saying that it seems like I'm missing something obvious. I'm trying to add segmentation VLANS in a network that is already in place and run so I keep taking baby steps, and I try to get an end-to-end testing prior to deployment in a greater way.

  We are in a basic configuration collapsed with a N4032F acting as the nucleus and in order to test a 5548 and a trendy on 3524.

  I have a client connected to 1/e7 and set to VLAN 12 the 3524. Another client on the 5548 item in gi1/0/6 and position VLAN 11. Both are subnets single 24 bit (192.168.70.0 and 192.168.50.0 respectively).

  Clients can ping the gateway (192.168.xx.1) and even the opposite gateway ping (192.168.50.10 can ping 192.168.70.1 and vice versa).

  However, the clients cannot ping each other. Something is not properly configured to route packets to the vlan opposed and I'm stumped! I'm new to configurations VLAN, but thought I was about there because I could ping all the gateways for routing.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  This seems to be due to a problem with the switch 3524. If I keep the two clients on the same VLAN (and good subnet) on the 3524 then it is fine. However, if I try to separate them or VLAN can ping gateways or each other. So basically the feature that I have seen above with the 5548, I can't duplicate it onto the 3524.

  UPDATE! : it works! Now my configs are all good. So I can ping every client on different switches. It seems that the 3524 may have limits on the number of VLANS, it can send through a trunk. When I just VLAN1 (for general traffic) and the routing of VLAN12 works correctly.

  However, when I try to put VLAN1, VLAN11 AND VLAN12 on the 3324, I am more able to send anything through the trunk. (Even if the 11 and 12 are identified as being allowed on the trunk)

• Need help with set up on PC6624 InterVLAN routing

  Hello

  I stack 5-switch 5548 Dell PC / 1 PC 6624 switch for layer 3 routing.

  I connected battery to PC6624 with 10 GB fiber cable.

  I created several VLANs on the layer 2 stack. Now how to set up communication Inter VLAN switch PC 6624?

  Concerning

  Marion

  Hello

  Page 507 of the manual explains how to enable IP routing on the switch ftp://ftp.dell.com/Manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/powerconnect-6248_User%27s%20Guide2_en-us.pdf

  Here is a document explaining the Setup on an older switch, the concepts are the same http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pwcnt/en/app_note_38.pdf

• SG300-28 questions - InterVLAN routing

  Hi all

  I am trying to switch SG300-28 place and do work for several days, with a very simple configuration, but this device is just to stuborn giving me headaches. I hope that you will tell me a solution to my problem.

  So I configured the VLAN on the switch, assigned to all ports, given IP addresses for VLANs, etc.. But I digress not test phase where I try to rattle of two stations of different VLANS.

  I have pictures of the attached current configuration. Stations are on ports 4 (VLAN4) and port 15 (VLAN3). First good 192.168.30.x a station address with the default gateway 192.168.30.1. Second station address of the 192.168.5.x and gateway 192.168.5.1. The two stations can ping the two gateways, but not eachother. Traffic within a VIRTUAL local network works fine, so routing is the most obvious problem.

  There is no active ACLs.

  Please see attached photos and give me something to try, because I spent three days to experiment without luck!

  One of the biggest mistakes I see relies on 'ping' to see if things work. Do not forget that the 'ping' sends a request to echo, that does not force the customer to send and echo response. Ensure that stations are configured to respond to pings or try to access a share, or a service configured on clients. Another thing to consider, that the client ports access ports and not General, this can be a problem, but it should be allowed, as is.

  On a side note, the current configuration you cannot access anything out in the cloud. If you need to access cloud do not forget to add a default route on the switch.

  I hope this helps!

• SGE2000P - InterVLAN Routing & internet Gateway

  Hi all

  I read articles and discussions on the forum for a while now, as I'm collecting information before the design of any change to network or make purchases.

  Currently, we have a simple network and we intend to 'upgrade' it a bit. We want to implement VLANs to separate wireless clients, Desktop + servers and infrastructure equipment form between them.

  From now, we have no VLAN and no manageable. We have a RV016 that handles both Internet service providers and a 3rd party connection for branches of office service (I think they are using Frame Relay, but we know, we are not concerned because we cannot touch their devices)

  The reason behind the title, pointing to the famous SGE2000P, is that my workplace is located in Argentina... and we do not have as much choice as some of you guys! Actually, I was trying to get a Cisco partner to contact me unsuccessfully. We would like to replace the with a cisco RV016 1941 (and a HWIC change card).

  So, back to business... ! Assuming that we use SGE2000P switches, I thought on the definition of VLANs with 802. 1 q seven of these switches, as well as a router from Cisco 1941. I'm waiting for the 1941 to manage a balancing between the two ISPS and the 3rd party link. Now, for what is the Inter VLAN routing I would have gigabit traffic between the VLANS. It is not imperative but it would be a nice feature and appreciated, (Besides, our current system works at speeds of 10/100. I know, it's hard to believe, but it's the truth!).

  so my question is...

  Is it possible to use an EMS as Layer 3 to hande traffic inter VLAN mode (gigabit speed) while using the 1941 as an endpoint device to reach internet (using PAT)?

  Would you suggest me to use the 1941 for Inter VLAN routing, despite the limitation (*) 10/100 and use all the EMS is in L2 mode?

  (*): We need to two Internet service providers, a third link to connect to EN and finally the LAN interface. As far as I know, I'm limited to integrated into a thin WAN gigabit interfaces, am I right?

  Thanks in advance!

  Agustin.

  Hi Agustin, the switch is able to control the traffic of inter - vlan in layer 3. The trick to make it work is to ensure the default gateway of connection of hosts to be that they are a member of the SVI.

  I highly recommend that you do not use the stack of these switches feature, especially if you plan to have 7 of them. The implementation of the stack is kind of poor and can give problems of reliability especially in mode layer 3.

  I think it's probably better to have the switch to handle routing more before he goes to the router, it should help the performance of the network, such that it should aggregate traffic.

  You need only 1 of the EMS in mode layer 3, the rest should stay mode layer 2, unless you have a specific reason otherwise. For the performance of the network, the other 6 switches must be layer 2.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Layer 3 intervlan routing

  Hi all

  I'm still working on how to route between the 7 VLANS I installed on my sg-300 in layer 3. When I look at the routes static ip4 I see that him vlan management is listed as local, but there is no other local interface. That's what confused me that some like all my VLAN has an assigned IP address.

  someone could make the light on how the 300 series to route between the VLANS, as it never stops timing when ping interfaces

  Hi, Patrick!

  Thank you for your participation in the community of support to small businesses. My name is Nico Muselle of Cisco Sofia HWC.

  You say that you have created the 7 VLANS, but you'll see as your default VLAN in the static as routes being local, if I understand correctly?

  When you checked this, are there had clients connected to other than the default VLAN? In fact, these static routes are added dynamically as soon as at least a client is connected to the VLAN. So if you connect a client Let's say VLAN 2 and refresh static routes, a route to VLAN 2 should be added as local.

  Please try it and let me know if it works.

  Best regards

  Nico glacier

  Senior Network Engineer - CCNA

• The SG300 - ACL support intervlan routing

  I have Setup SG300 - 52p mode switch layer 3.

  I have 3 VLAN (10,20,30) and the affected ports to each vlan.

  Each host can ping its own gateway (according to the VLAN).

  I want to enable some of the traffic of a vlan to a specific host (server) on a different VLAN. I try with ACL, but no can do.

  Can someone help me how to do this?

  Thank you very much.

  Hey Ruy,

  My isa very restrictive ACL.

  Restrict_FTP extended IP access list

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.10 0.0.0.0

  output

  It allows only the 192.168.10.0 network to get host 192.168.20.10 IP host.

  There is also perhaps (in red);

  Restrict_FTP extended IP access list

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.10 0.0.0.0

  deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  allow a full

  output

  I must confess that I prefer to use the GUI to produce my ACEs.  The table he creates shows how the ACL will work. and especially in what order.

  • The switch through ACEs in order from top to bottom as seen in the GUI.
  • The ACL that is attached to an interface, boss of matching incoming packages (coming into the switch).
  • ACE entries use reverse masking can be confusing.  Perhaps the following tehnote may be useful for understanding the inverse of masking;

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps1018/products_tech_note09186a00800a5b9a.shtml

  What about Dave

• Exempt NAT and in cisco ASA intervlan routing scenario

  Hi, I'm new to Cisco ASA. I did some study on Cisco ASA recently and you try to understand how it works.

  The chart above illustrates the architecture of network in my company (attachment). The two FW (5520, version 8.0) are configured with nat control and same-security-traffic permit inter-interface. I have a ping of device A to unit B (10.10.105.244 > 10.10.70.70/24).

  At FW 02, I added an inbound ACL (10.10.105.0/24 > 10.10.70.0/24) because of the difference in level of security between the input and output interface (SL 50 < sl="" 100).="" for="" the="" return="" traffic="" (10.10.70.0/24=""> 10.10.105.0/24), I only need to add a device nat exempted from the rules as I have it configured with permit same-security-traffic inter-interface. My understanding is correct?

  FW 01, I need to add an entry ACL (10.10.70.0/24 > 10.10.105.244). Without the rule, my ping will be unsuccessful. Can I know why I need to add this rule to incoming traffic, because same-security-traffic permits inter-interface is set to FW 01? Can I know why I have no need to nat exempt traffic (10.10.105.0/24 > 10.10.70.0/24)?

  Sorry for the long explanation. I hope to get clarification and to ensure that my interpretation is correct.

  Thanks for all the comments. Have a nice day :)

  Hello

  For your first question: ""I know why I need to add this rule to incoming traffic, because the same-security-traffic inter-interface permit is set to FW 01?".

  It probably has to do with the ICMP inspection. By default, ICMP traffic is not inspected by the ASA for the return of the device traffic B to the device will be dropped on FW 01. You must activate the ICMP inspection by adding it to the MPF on the SAA default configuration.

  For your second question: "I know why I don't not need to nat exempt traffic (10.10.105.0/24 > 10.10.70.0/24)"?".

  NAT-control does not affect the same security interfaces, i.e. the same security interfaces can communicate without NAT even if NAT-control is turned on (with some exceptions). See this link for more information.