Maximum number of errors to input registers, tried different settings to XML

Similar Questions

• Table of ODI and Error Message (Oracle CKM) errors and maximum number of errors

  Greetings,
  
  
  I have two questions that I hope you can give me some advice.
  
  --> In an ODI Interface, while on the "checks" tab, I chose 100% the maximum errors (by pressing checbox % and typing 100), this does not at all errors, instead, I see in operator whose Interface has failed because he has reached the maximum limit of errors.
  
  
  -> The delicate one: I was looking for in Oracle CKM, and I can't find information on where odiref.getFK ("MESS") is built. The output of this method call is editable? When this error Message is built and how can I customize it?
  
  
  
  Thanks for your help,
  Best regards

  Hello

  Can you please increase ODI parameter below location and check the same

  ODI menu > user settings > operator limit display (0 = no limit)

  Display the change operator (0 = no limit) limit: 100 as 100000 (1 lakhs)

  Kind regards
  Phanikanth

• Windows 7 disk management utility does not allow for creating simple volume: maximum number of partitions exceeded error

  I am trying to create a new partition in Win7 using the disk management utility. Shrank lecteurC existing to create unallocated space. Am not able to create a simple volume with this space unallocated due to the following error message.

  "You cannot create a new volume in this unallocated space because the disk already contains the maximum number of partitions".

  How to fix this or go around with another method to create partitions?

  Hello

  You will need to convert the dynamic disk before creating the extra partition. To do this in disk management:

  -Right-click the disk 0 (gray area) which indicates the total size of your hard drive

  -Select 'convert to dynamic disk.

  Once you have converted to dynamic disk, you will be able to go and create the new simple partition.

  I hope this helps.

  Best regards, Damian

  Damian Coverly

• Windows Explorer crashes and get this error in the event log: maximum number of ATI EEU session has been exceeded

  Windows Explorer crashes and it is what I have in my event log. Can anyone help?

  Exceeded maximum number of ATI EEU session

  Hi TodFranklin,

  1. when exactly you receive this error message?

  2 did you do changes on the computer before the show?

  Follow the suggestions below for a possible solution:

  Method 1:

  Step 1: Start in safe mode and check if the problem persists.

  Start your computer in safe mode

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/start-your-computer-in-safe-mode

   

  Step 2: If the problem does not occur in safe mode, you can put your system to boot (in normal mode) to solve the problem.

   

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

   

  Note: After troubleshooting, be sure to configure the computer to start as usual as mentioned in step 7 provided in the above article.

  Method 2: I also suggest that you scan your computer with the Microsoft Security Scanner, which would help us to get rid of viruses, spyware and other malicious software.

  The Microsoft Security Scanner is a downloadable security tool for free which allows analysis at the application and helps remove viruses, spyware and other malware. It works with your current antivirus software.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

   

  Note: The Microsoft Safety Scanner ends 10 days after being downloaded. To restart a scan with the latest definitions of anti-malware, download and run the Microsoft Safety Scanner again.

  Important: During the scan of the hard drive if bad sectors are found, the scanner tries to repair this sector, all available on which data may be lost.

  Let us know if that helps.

• error ora-00036 maximum number of levels of sql recursive (50) exceeded

  I have a trigger of the declaration on the LEVELS table, I want to update COMPONENTS field when another field is changed in TIERS, in order to avoid the calculations, I used to ch line shutter COMPONENTS to complete a package, but I get this error ora-00036 maximum number of recursive sql exceeded (50)

  It's my trigger:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS

    after update on tiers 

   

    I INT ;

   

    FOR I IN (PKG_TIERS. TAB. FIRST)... (PKG_TIERS. TAB. Last) LOOP

  UPDATE to levels

  PUT REFERENCE_EXTERNE = "YYYY"

  WHERE LEVELS = PKG_TIERS. TAB (I). I_TIERS;

    END LOOP;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS;

  
  

  This is ma for each trigger line:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E

  after Update FOR CODE_TYPE_TIERS on LEVELS

    for each row

  V_CPT INTEGER ;

    IF : NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS IS NOT NULL THEN

  IF PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST IS NULL THEN

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). I_TIERS: =: NEW. BLEACHERS;

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). CODE_TYPE_TIERS: =: NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS;

     ELSE

  V_CPT: = PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST + 1;

     END IF;

    END IF;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E;

  Clearly, you have past of recursion.  After updating the table of LEVELS, then a statement trigger level (after update) as the fires that updates the table LEVELS... which will cause then itself to once again fire... which will cause himself to fire once again... which will cause itself to the light again... etc etc.

  If it is a business logic that should be implemented, so you don't want to include it as a trigger, you want to just have a code in a package that updates the table once.

  If it were me, I would scrap two triggers in this case.  Have a trigger is fired for each row updated (in SQL) which has then cross to the PL/SQL package for details of this update line, means you to act so the context switching between SQL and PL/SQL for each update line, which will affect the performance of the updates.

  Explain what you're actually trying to do (business logic), with a few examples and data tables and we might be able to propose a better approach, which is not abusing triggers in this way.

• NonLinearFitWithWeight do not erturn of error if exceeded the maximum number of iterations

  Hello

  It seems to me that the NonLinearFitWithWeight function does NOT return an error if the maximum number of iterations is reached without achieving a solution – unlike the description in the manual...

  Previously, I had reported a bug related to the NonLinearFitWithMaxIters function that has been fixed in CVI2009 (bug ID 183434). However, since this function nonlinearfitwithweight is new on CVI2009, there could well be a bug too...

  Wolfgang

  
  

• DAQmx C API - maximum number of simultaneous input available channels.

  I develop software to purchase customized using the C/C++ API. I have no particular problem with implementing the sample clock, tampons, modes etc. But I have a problem with determination one of the properties of a device:

  What is the maximum number of supported Ia-sampled tracks simultaneously (in a task) for a particular device...

  I managed to read all other properties (maxrate, physical, ranges channels, Terminal configurations...), but the mentioned property is not found in the API reference. This is related to the error -200168: "number of acquisition channels exceeds the maximum of the device. Well order is not for this, I need the "maximum of device", MAX points out as 'maximum number of channels allowed:» Is this hardcoded in MAX property and must be known for each device, or is there a corresponding value in the DAQmx API? Also if this is the case, where in the documentation and/or specifications of each device is it said?

  If it's interesting - I use for most devices M-series (USB6211, USB6009, USB6212...).

  Thanks in advance. I will be grateful for all comments and suggestions.

  ttaneff is a kind of corner cases where you have multiple copies of the same physical channel in your task.  It is sometimes useful for various reasons (for example to be able to enjoy the same channel with a different terminal configuraiton or with another range of entry, or maybe something like this).

  Fast experience, the M Series devices can have up to 4095 channels. The 6009 can have up to 8. There is no property node that refers to these values, and I'm not even not aware of any documentation with respect to them.

  However, you can have more channels configured (on each device) if all of the following characteristics apply:

  1. you have sets of channels with a similar configuration (physical channel, range, terminal configuraiton all identical)
  2. these strings are grouped consecutively to the task (e.g., chA, chA, chA, chB, chB, chB,...)
  3. the number of channels in each group of consecutive channels is the same (I'm not sure of the limit of the maximum size of the groups - memory and performance problems are probably your factor limiting)
  4. the number of groupings is limited to the numbers above (4095 M series, 8 for 6009).

  Here are some examples:

  

  

  

  EDIT: I just realized that you are using the C API, apologies for examples of LabVIEW - I hope that the examples always wise.

  Best regards

• Maximum number of partitions errors

  Original title: impossible to assign the unallocated disk space.gives drive letter an error ' you cannot created new volume in this unallocated space because the disk already contains the maximum number of partitions. Please help, thank you. Lesley Fernandes

  Impossible to assign the unallocated disk space.gives drive letter an error ' you cannot created new volume in this unallocated space because the disk already contains the maximum number of partitions. Please help, thank you. Lesley Fernandes

  You are allowed a maximum of four partitions. More than likely you have created four "Primary" partitions

  If you want to access this "Unallocated" space, you have two choices:

  (1) Expand/extend the last partition to include the unallocated space.

  (2) (delete the last partition "Primary" (save your data first) and create an 'Extended' partition, which can then be used to create one or more logical drives.

  JS
  http://www.PAGESTART.com

  Never be afraid to ask. This forum has some of the best people in the world to help.

• Maximum number of simultaneous connections error

  Hello!

  After a year of using my BB app, some users have reported to me that following error occurred yesterday:

  net.rim.protocol.iplayer.device.IOException: reach Maximum simultaneous connections to net.rim.protocol.iplayer.queue.IPLayerReceivingQueueManager.puttinQueue(IPLayerReceivingQueueManager.java:171) to net.rim.protocol.iplayer.thread.ListenForClientsPackets.run(ListenForClientsPackets.java:116)

  I searched, but it seems rare to find this error. Can someone tell me what this acutally?

  Thank you!

  Does that help?

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/maximum-number-of-simultaneous-connections/t...

• Error already have the maximum number of partitions, impossible to reclaim the unallocated disk space

  Original title: recovery disk unallocated space - please help

  I bought a lenovo z370 and it came with a partition of a disk c with 653 GB NTFS and d lenovo 30 GB drive and two other drives without names like d or e simply unamed with 200 MB of space and another with 14 GB of space... now to partition C drive more far I used the shrink option and shrunk 200 GB which now shows as unallocated space and when I try to create a new volume on it it says I already have the maximum number of partitions... What do I do now? How to restore this 200 GB of unallocated in my c drive space or do in another player... Please please help

  And see if I've followed the process this last link of how to re-partition my drive is what I did in the first place and because I got 4 partitions as I detailed it in the other answer, I have written that if I reduce my c drive, it becomes unallocated space, and even with the new volume Wizard does not become a player since I get an error message have already 4 partitions...

• I'm trying to reinstall CS2 on an XP that has never been installed. The download works fine, but will not accept my serial number to activate. I copy and paste from my account to ensure accuracy. Continue to receive the serial number incorrect error. What

  I'm trying to reinstall CS2 on an XP that has never been installed. The download works fine, but will not accept my serial number to activate. I copy and paste from my account to ensure accuracy. Continue to receive the serial number incorrect error. What would be my next step to get this race?

  CS2 (or earlier version) activation server has disappeared, then read below

  You MUST use the special number on the page, not your original serial number

  l http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/Policy-Pricing/Creative-Suite-2-activation-end-Life.htm

• I just bought first elements13 and I installed it. But whenever I try to get my license number, an error message appears that says that my computer is not connected to the internet. I've tried everything. Help!

  I just bought first elements13 and I installed it. But whenever I try to get my license number, an error message appears that says that my computer is not connected to the internet. I've tried everything. Help!

  Check your hosts among other common problems, sign in, activation or connection errors. CS5.5 and later, Acrobat DC

• OBIEE 11 g: error - exceeded configured the maximum number of authorized release

  Hi guys,.
  
  We are implementing the OOTB repository, after some reports of loading data show the following error msg. Can someone tell me where to change the limits?
  
  «Error loading of list "«display error»»»
  «"Exceeded the configured maximum number of allowed output prompts, sections, the lines or columns»» It must be because of the restriction on the number of records in a report"
  
  Thanks in advance

  Hello user,.

  Even I faced the same error and solved in the way below: -.

  Error: Exceeded the configured maximum number of guests allowed output, the sections, the lines of OBIEE 11 g.

  So to solve this problem, add the below tags mentioned in the instanceconfig.xml file that is located under

  \Middleware\instances\instance1\config\OracleBIPresentationServicesComponent\coreapplication_obips1

  http://bidevata.WordPress.com/2012/04/27/exceeded-configured-maximum-number-of-allowed-output-prompts-in-OBIEE-11g/

  Mark useful/correct.

  Thank you
  OBIEELearner.

• < cfspreadsheet > and "...". "maximum number of fonts has been exceeded" error in Excel 2007

  A client and I both live the same error message when you open a spreadsheet generated by ColdFusion version 9.0.0 (deployment of Windows). The generated workbook is relatively complex, with a summary tab and about 25 other tabs.

  Here is the exact error that opens in Excel 2003 and 2007:

  Some text formatting may have changed in this file, because the maximum number of fonts has been exceeded. It can help to close other documents and try again.

  This only happens when the amount of data stored in the document is larger (but I can't tell you exactly how big the document must do in order to start to trigger this error). I'm no formatting with fonts, which explains why this error is confusing for me. There are some columns I'm formatting in different data formats in each tab, things like this:

  <cffunction name="formatEventSheet" hint="Formats a given row in a spreadsheet and returns the spreadsheet object.">
      <cfargument name="spreadsheet" hint="Spreadsheet object to manipulate. Active sheet must be set to sheet to modify.">
   
      <cfset var loc = StructNew()>
   
      <!--- Currency formatting --->
      <cfset loc.currencyFormat = StructNew()>
      <cfset loc.currencyFormat.dataFormat = "($##,####0.00);($##,####0.00)">
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 5)>
   
      <cfreturn arguments.spreadsheet>
   
  </cffunction>
  

  
  

  <cffunction name="formatEventSummarySheet" hint="Formats a given row in a spreadsheet and returns the spreadsheet object.">
      <cfargument name="spreadsheet" hint="Spreadsheet object to reference. Active sheet must be set to sheet to modify.">
   
      <cfset var loc = StructNew()>
   
      <!--- Currency formatting --->
      <cfset loc.currencyFormat = StructNew()>
      <cfset loc.currencyFormat.dataFormat = "($##,####0.00);($##,####0.00)">
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 4)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 6)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 8)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 10)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 12)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 14)>
      <cfset SpreadsheetFormatColumn(arguments.spreadsheet, loc.currencyFormat, 16)>
   
      <cfreturn arguments.spreadsheet>
   
  </cffunction>
  

  I can post some more code if need be (there are lots of it), but I was wondering if anyone has run across this in general and they did to remedy.

  Post edited by: Chris Peters - added syntax highlighting.

  Here is some information from a post on experts-exchange website. It seems that this could be applicable in your case...

  This error is generated when you have maxed out the internal formatting tables.

  Here are a few notes on the reduction of the use of the entries in the table formatting...

  A common misconception is that at some point in formatting any range of contiguous cells results in smaller workbooks. It is, for the most part, is not true. The only time where excel keeps the size of the workbook is when a column of cells is formatted to a starting cell to the bottom of the worksheet. The starting cell can be on a line, but the last cell must be on the last line of the spreadsheet. Layout of several contiguous columns at the bottom of the worksheet gives the same result as formatting each column individually.

  Note that when formatting of the horizontal borders in a column, do not set the bottom as border doing so will require as much file size as if every cell in the column have been formatted separately. Set inside horizontal border only.

  A quick test shows this behavior. Create two new workbooks. In the first, select the A2:A65536 cells, set the background color and save. In the second, select the A2:A65535 cells, set the background color and save. Using Windows File Explorer, look at the size of the files of the two workbooks. Note that the first workbook is approximately 12 KB in size, while the second is more than 2 MB.

  Formatting columns of cells in this way has another advantage: the used range is unaffected. In other words, if the formatting of the cells A2:A65535 the used range is set to A2:A65525. However, if the A2:A65536 cells are formatted, the used range is affected. Note that this is not true in line or horizontal direction. In other words, a line in the format of the column at the right IV reset the range used to include column IV. Also, note that this problem has been corrected in Excel 2003 and lines behave like columns in 2003 regarding the used range.

  Another interesting aspect of formatting of columns to the bottom of the worksheet is that the completed workbook file size advantage is not compromised by reformatting the individual cells within the larger range. For example, if A2:A65536 of cells are formatted as cell A1000 is then formatted another way, the size of the workbook file continues to be small.  This is true even if cell A65536 got rid of all formatting. Note that the unformatted cells consume space because they are exceptions to the first formatting and so services provided by the formatting at the end of the worksheet are eroded as more and more cells are positioned to other formats or erased formats.

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded

  All respected DBAs,

  Today I faced an issue. I found below statement alertlog file and when I tried to connect to the base of this error came on the command line.

  "ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 150.

  Then I restarted my Oracle Service, connected to the database and questioned

  select * from v$ resource_limit and found this result.

  Process

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 52

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 61

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 150

  LIMIT_VALUE = 150

  Sessions

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 53

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 60

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 248

  LIMIT_VALUE = 248

  If my process is exceeded then why MAX_UTILIZATION = 61 only? Please, help me to understand this.

  This view is dynamic (it will reset on reboot) and restart you the database.

  So you can only say that after the restart of the database the number of processes is already 61.

  -------------

  Sybrand Bakker

  Senior Oracle DBA