Memory access Internet via USB...

How can I access the internal memory? When I connect via USB, only showed storage is the SD card, I installed. I don't see the internal storage. I would like to add my photos of my old Captivate to my new Atrix 2, but I can't. I have a 2G SD card, which has been very long since I save the images in the phone's memory and make a back up periodically. So, how can I put my old pictures on the phone, not the SD card? I tried the port USB, MotoLink (which I discovered is not compatible yet) and the portal of phone... nothing. Help please!

On the Captivate, I could plug it into the USB port and two drives will appear... one for the internal memory of the phone and one for the external SD card. How it works with the Atrix 2? Thank you!

The Captivate and Atrix 1 have an external SD card and what is called an "internal SD card" - not really an SD card, but the system thus so you have storage even if no SD card is connected.

The Atrix 2 does not have an "internal SD card." The internal memory is for only - just like unreachable on the Captivate application storage.

You need to get a bigger external SD card if you want to take more pictures. I know that Buy.com just had 8 GB for $10 while they are very affordable now--yet more low-speed 32 GB are less than $50.

Tags: Motorola Phones

Similar Questions

  • Can not access internet via wireless HTTP 404

    I plugged a wireless (NetGear) adapter to my PC to be able to access the internet via the card my husband Verizon Wireless.  He says that I'm connected to the internet, but the only thing I get when I try to connect to any site is error 404 web page not found.  It's probably something simple, I need to set up on my desktop, but I can't find a way to solve this problem.

    Thank you... I actually got a response via Widgetbox.com yesterday.  I had to go to the workstation, Panel, network and Internet Options, Internet connections, connections and go to LAN settings and uncheck all checked it (the checked was something to do with a proxy server).  And that's all that it was him - everything has worked correctly!  Hope this helps someone else.

  • Access Internet via WiFi with E3200

    Hello

    is it possible the E3200 router to connect to internet via wifi (WLAN) interface?

    In fact I can use the ethernet port called 'Internet' to connect with my router Fritz Box (which is responsible for my internet connection to my DSL provider).

    But I don't want to use 10 m or over ethernet cable in my apartment, so it would be good to use just wifi.

    Can someone help me get this to work?

    Thank you very much.

    Lol it is not possible. It's a completely different operation mode. The E3200 has an access points wireless that accepts incoming connections from clients. You want the E3200 to connect to a different wireless access point, either you want the E3200 to customer connect to an another acccess points.

    Which is like a cell tower: it accepts connections, but it connects to the other rounds (at least not using cellular frequencies).

    This has nothing to do with the routing to this level, but only with basic connectivity.

    The E3200 with Linksys firmware requires a wired connection.

    3rd party firmware may allow you to use the E3200 as bridge or wireless Repeater same as wireless, perhaps with the FritzBox. But we have to ask in a dd - wrt forum for this.

  • No split tunnel-access internet via isa in dmz

    Hello

    I have configured my asa 5520 v 7.2 for remote VPN. Its works fine. I need to provide my customer internet access without activating split tunnel. I went through a few example below of a doc:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

    the preceding is not enough more me like one have different needs

    I want my client VPN to ASA and access to internet, I had ISA connected to the VPN device. All my vpn clients want access to the internet, it must use this operation to access the internet. My ISA server is in the same subnet of the VPN device by using a different gw for internet access.

    Pls comment

    Add the below: -.

    attributes of the strategy of group staffvpn

    use a MSIE-proxy-server method

    Internet Explorer-proxy server value x.x.x.x

    Disable Internet Explorer-proxy local-bypass

    attributes of the strategy of group staffvpn

    use a MSIE-proxy-server method

    Internet Explorer-proxy server value x.x.x.x

    Disable Internet Explorer-proxy local-bypass

    attributes of the strategy of group newstaffvpn

    use a MSIE-proxy-server method

    Internet Explorer-proxy server value x.x.x.x

    Disable Internet Explorer-proxy local-bypass

    adel username attributes

    use a MSIE-proxy-server method

    Internet Explorer-proxy server value x.x.x.x

    Disable Internet Explorer-proxy local-bypass

    username weppe attributes

    use a MSIE-proxy-server method

    Internet Explorer-proxy server value x.x.x.x

    Disable Internet Explorer-proxy local-bypass

    Remote VPN group no matter what you want to test with. where x.x.x.x is the IP address of the ISA server computer.

    HTH.

  • ASA 5505 VPN works great but can't access internet via the tunnel to customers

    We have an ASA 5505 ASA 8.2.1 running and using IPSec for Remote access clients in the main office.  Remote access is a lot of work, with full access to network resources in the main office and the only thing I can't get to work is access to internet through the tunnel.  I don't want to use split tunneling.  I use ASDM 6.2.1 for configuration.  Any help is appreciated.  I'm probably missing something simple and it looked so much, I'm probably looking at right beyond the error.  Thanks in advance for your time and help!    Jim

    Add a statement of nat for your segment of customer on the external interface

    NAT (outside) - access list

    then allow traffic routing back on the same interface, it is entered in the

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    *

    *

    * more than information can be found here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a00807...

    On Wednesday, 27 January 2010, at 23:12, jimcanova

  • Can't access internet via Firefox on the XP machine after that some message McAphee, although can be accessed via Internet Explorer. Solution?

    My wife noticed that she has received a message from McAfee (forgotten) just before that the problem has begun, and that a green McAfyestee search engine appears on his yahoo email account shortly after.

    Check the McAfee settings to make sure that it is not blocking Firefox. For more information, see Configuration of McAfee Internet Security or McAfee Total Protection configuration.

  • Unable to access internet via a wireless connection

    original title; Wireless cannot be used. Only the adapter! Help someone

    someone help me please my wireless can't be used but only my adapter can be used my laptop is aspire 4741g

    On many models, there is a hardware switch - check that it has not set to the OFF"" position.

  • error when you try to connect to the internet via a modem usb - 6 error: the handle is invalid

    error 6: the handle is invalid - I see this error message when you try to connect to internet via usb modem

    I'm using windows Vista Home Basic and attempts to connect to the internet via a usb Huawei modem.

    but when connect this device on windows xp pro his works very well.

    but with vista I see this error msg

    The handle is invalid

    any idea to solve this problem?
    Thank you

    You can get in trouble with your device drivers, firmware and/or software.  Go to the Device Manager by going to start / find and type Device Manager and enter and then double-click on the program icon that appears.  Check each device to a red x, yellow! or white?  These identify devices with problems probably (drivers, but also of conflict or something else).  Click on each for more details and troubleshooting tips.  If you need to get the drivers (and you shouldat least make the modem and everything you have time to do - they can help way beyond simply solve this problem), let the computer dealer or the manufacturer of the device (NOT of Microsoft Updates).  In fact, you must disable automatic updates in Windows Update driver as follows: http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/how-to-disable-automatic-driver-installation-in-windows-vista/. Follow these steps to get the drivers: http://pcsupport.about.com/od/driverssupport/ht/driverdlmfgr.htm.  Once you have the drivers, you can install them via the Manager device as follows:http://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/193584-device-manager-install-driver.html.

    Try to uninstall and then reinstall the modem again.  Remove the modem through Control Panel > phones and Modems, then uninstall the modem in Device Manager. Once the reboot is complete and it is reinstalled it should work (as long as you use the update of the above paragraph).  Make sure that you uninstall in this order.

    Are you sure that the modem is compatible with Vista and the rest of your system?  What is the manufacturer, brand and model?  You can find here:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-vista/.

    I hope this helps.

    Good luck!

    Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

  • Internet through USB on El Capitan

    Anyone know why I can't connect to internet via USB?

    I got Yosemite, just upgraded to El Capitan 10.11.4 and my usb modem no longer works.

    any ideas?

    Thank you

    You don't say what to do with the USB modem you have. Many drivers USB stopped working after upgrading to El Capitan, I think that white USB modem old own Apple. In some cases manufacturers have since issued new drivers to make their products compatible with El Capitan, but Apple do not plan to issue a new driver for their old USB modem.

  • I can't connect to internet via wifi

    I use a laptop and a second laptop can connect but my office will not connect to any kind of work more after about one year.

    Hello pjw7167,

    Welcome to the Microsoft community where you can find all the answers related to windows.

    According to the description, it seems that you have problems with the wireless connection. As I understand it, that you can not access Internet via Wifi.

    I need to ask you some questions to help you better.

    1. do you get an error message when you try to connect?

    2. the problem when you try to connect by cable?

    3. were there any changes (hardware or software) to the computer before the show?

    Perform the steps in the link and check.

    How to troubleshoot wireless network connections in Windows XP Service Pack 2

    Answer to us if you are experiencing problems with wireless networks or any other problem of Windows, and I'd be happy to help you.

    Good day!

    Hope this information helps.

  • DMVPN and INTERNET VIA HUB RENTAL ISSUES

    Hello everyone,

    I really wish you can help me with the problem I have.

    I explain. I test a double Hub - double DMVPN Layout for a client before we set it up in actual production.
    The client has sites where routers are behind some ISP routers who do NAT.

    How things are configured:

    -All rays traffic must go through the location of the hub if no local internet traffic on the rays.
    -Hub 1 and 2 hub sends a default route to rays through EIGRP. But only Hub 1 is used.
    -Hub 1 is the main router to DMVPN. In case of connection / hardware failure of the Internet Hub 2 become active for DMVPN and Internet.
    -Hub 1 and 2 hub are both connected to an ISP and Internet gateway for rays.
    -Hub 1 and 2 hub are configured with IOS Firewall.
    -On the shelves I used VRF for separate DMVPN routning Global routning table so I could receive a default route of 1 Hub and Hub 2 to carry the traffic of rays to the Internet via the location of the hub

    What works:

    -All rays can have access to the local network to the location of the hub.
    -All the rays can do talk of talk
    -Working for DMVPN failover
    -Rais NOT behind the router NAT ISP (i.e. the public IP address) directly related to their external interface can go Internet via hub location and all packages are inspected properly by the IOS and Nat firewall properly
     
    What does not work:

    -Rays behind the NAT ISP router can not access Internet via Hub location. They can reach a local network to the location of the hub and talk of talks.
    IOS Firewall Router hub shows packages from rays of theses (behind a NAT) with a source IP address that is the router og PSI of public IP address outside the interface. Not the private address LAN IP back spoke.
    In addition, the packets are never natted. If I do some captge on an Internet Server, the private source IP is the IP LAN to the LAN behind the rays. This means that the hub, router nat never these packages.

    How to solve this problem?

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    Well I don't know that's why I need your help/advice :-)

    I don't know that if I have to configure a VRF on the location of the hub gets also like things might mess upward.

    The problem seems to be NAT - T the rays that are not behind a NAT, among which go over the Internet through a Hub and inspection of Cisco IOS and NAT are trying to find.

    I tested today with the customer at the start them talking behind nat could ping different server on the Internet but not open an HTTP session. DNS was to find work. The IOS Firewall has been actually

    inspection of packages with private real IP address. Then I thought it was a MTU issue, so I decided to do a ping on the Internet with the largest MTU size and suddenly the pings were no more.

    I could see on the router Hub1 IOS Firewall was inspecting the public IP of the ISP NAT router again alongside with rays and not more than the actual IP address private. Really strange!

    Attached files:

    I attach the following files: a drawing of configuration called drawing-Lab - Setup.jpeg | All files for HUB1, BRANCH1 and BRANCH2 ISP-ROUTER configs, named respectively: HUB1.txt, BRANCH1.txt, BRANCH2.txt and ISP - ROUTER .txt

    Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch2 (behind the NAT ISP router):

    Branch2 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

    Type to abort escape sequence.
    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.110.1
    .....
    Success rate is 0% (0/5)

    * 06:04:51.017 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (110.10.10.2:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

    If the IOS Firewall does not inspect the true private source IP address that can be, in this case: 192.168.110.2. He sess on the public IP address.

    HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
    Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
    UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

    There is no entry for packets of teas present NAT

    Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

    7 7.355997 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo
    So that the firewall controllable IOS to the 110.10.10.2:8 public IP sniffing capture said that the package come from private real IP address

    Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

    114 14.123552 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

    If the private IP address of source between local network of BRANCH2 is never natted by HUB1

    If the server sees the address source IP private not natted although firewall IOS Hub1 inspect the public IP address 110.10.10.2:8

    Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch1 (not behind the NAT ISP router):

    Branch1 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

    Type to abort escape sequence.
    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source 192.168.100.1 address
    !!!!!

    * 06:05:18.217 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (192.168.100.1:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

    This is so the firewall sees the actual private IP which is 192.168.100.1

    HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
    Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
    UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:22 192.168.100.1:22 200.200.200.200:22 200.200.200.200:22

    The real private source IP address is also find natted 1 Hub outside the public IP address

    Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

    8 7.379997 192.168.100.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

    Real same as inspected by IOS Firewall so all private IP address is y find.

    Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    67 10.441153 80.10.10.2 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

    So, here's all right. The address is natted correctly.

    __________________________________________________________________________________________

    Best regards

    Laurent

    Hello

    Just saw your message, I hope this isn't too late.

    I don't know what your exact problem, but I think we can work through it to understand it.

    One thing I noticed was that your NAT ACL is too general. You need to make it more

    specific.  In particular, you want to make sure that it does not match the coming of VPN traffic

    in to / out of the router.

    For example you should not really have one of these entries in your NAT translation table.

    HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
    Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
    ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
    UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

    Instead use:

    Nat extended IP access list
    deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
    allow an ip
    deny ip any any newspaper

    If you can use:

    Nat extended IP access list
    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything
    deny ip any any newspaper

    Also, I would be very careful with the help of the "log" keyword in an ACL, NAT.

    I saw problems.

    What are the IOS versions do you use?

    Try to make changes to the NAT so that you no longer see the entries of translation NAT

    for packages of NAT - T (UDP 4500) in the table of translation NAT on the hub. It may be

    This puts a flag on the package structure, that IOS Firewall and NAT is

    pick up on and then do the wrong thing in this case.

    If this does not work then let me know.

    Maybe it's something for which you will need to open a TAC case so that we can

    This debug directly on your installation.

    Mike.

  • ACCESS INTERNET ON H P TAB 7 TAB (VOICE) VIA A USB CABLE FOR MY COMPUTER NETWORK

    I CAN'T ACCESS INTERNET ON H P TAB 7 TAB (VOICE) VIA A USB CABLE FOR MY COMPUTER NETWORK. PLEASE HELP ME.

    Hi AR7, welcome to the Forums of HP. I understand that you can not connected to the Internet. HP offers no support for this configuration, as a result, here's the method to connect to a WiFi network.

    Connect to a wireless (Android KitKat, Jelly Bean)

  • Could not connect to the internet via a USB Modem

    Could not connect to the internet via a USB Modem from my Nokia 6275 CDMA phone.

    Windows vista detects my phone connected via Nokia PC Suite via USB cable, but I couldn't connect to the internet using my phone as a USB modem dial. However, I am connected to the internet through the same dial-up access when I use bluetooth to connect to my phone as a modem. Please give me an emergency solution. I'm using windows vista 32-bit edition. It's windows vista Home premium.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-Vista/default.aspx

    Windows Vista Compatibility Center

    First thing to do is to check its Vista compatibility at the link above, and if not to see what patches/solutions are available from its manufacturer...

    And contact the technical support of Nokia: http://www.nokia.com.au/get-support-and-software/download-software#.

    See you soon.

    Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

  • Only browsers and AVAST cannot connect to internet via ethernet. Computers on the same router via WiFi, MS update, ping cmd - all access

    Help! I'm about to commit the homicide of the computer!

    I have been troubleshooting for weeks and am now bald from ripping my hair!

    Computer: Dell Inspiron 537 s Slim Desktop  w / Pentium Dual - Core CPU E5200 @250 GHz

    Network card: Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller (checked several times, through Windows, it works correctly)

    System: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-bit with Service Pack 1

    Router: Netgear N600 model #: WNDR3400v2

    Cable router: SBV5220 Surfboard Motorola

    Now several months ago this desktop computer once more had SOME programs lose the ability to access the internet via an Ethernet cable.

    Affected programs:

    MS Internet Explorer

    Mozilla Firefox

    Avast! Security Suite

    Work of MS Security Update

    Ping works sites (Yahoo, etc.)

    Other computers connected to this network via WiFi - no problem getting on the internet.

    Run the network troubleshooter advises all is working properly, no suggestion.

    Attempted fixes:

    Turn off all extensions on IE (but don't forget Firefox and Avast! are also unable to access.)

    Disabled all start-ups and the package process

    Restarted in Safe Mode - still not able to access.

    Ran check complete virus, then check virus run start. Minor ad-ware 'virus' not found, all corrected automatically.

    Rebooted the router and the computer to infinity and beyond! s

    Tried other computers using the same ethernet cable connected to this wireless routers cable, no problem accessing the internet.

    Disabled functions package

    Off MS Firewall

    IP Reset configuration (memory: netsh ip net reset c:\resetlog.txt - without DOUBT NOT EXACT - OF THE MEMORY.) Command worked)

    As I said, this had happened before and then miraculously fixed itself after a short period (less than 1 week). This time, no joy.

    Of course, it's one of two things:

    (1) a configuration problem I just can't find/understand.

    (2) the problem of equipment more strange, more selective, in the universe.

    Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

    Thank you more can I possibly Express for assistance.

    You could win the lottery and have a lot of beautiful children!

    (M.) Kel

    Hello team zig - zag,

    I wanted to thank you for your help. I finally broke down and reached out to our friends at Microsoft directly for assistance. They had me a role through all the things that you suggested (again). And finally (after many hours of phone and chat discussions) came up with an answer: "* shrug * we don't know what is the problem - choose a restore point and come back to that.» What I did. This has solved the problem of internet access, but created other problems I'm trying (nothing that I have to post here, they are specific to a particular program package).

    Still, I wanted to thank you for your time and effort on my behalf. I'm very, very happy!

    All my best,

    Kel

  • Impossible to attach Windows 10 laptop computer to the Internet via cable USB iPhone 5 c after update to iTunes and iPhone (March 2016)

    System information:

    Tactile Lenovo Y50-70

    Construction of 10.0.10586 of Windows 10-10586

    iPhone 5 c - iOS 9.2.1

    iTunes - 12.3.2.35 / 64-bit

    Cell carrier: Etisalat AF

    Last year in Afghanistan, I have used my iPhone 5 c to attach my laptop to the internet simply by connecting via USB.  It has always worked.  Was very simple.  When I returned to the States for R & R in November 2015, I've updated my iPhone and iTunes to the latest versions and upgrades Windows 8.1 to Windows 10.

    I am now back in Afghanistan and USB tethering no longer works.  WiFi tethering works half the time.  The other half of the time, when I try and connect to the network of the iPhone, it is said, you cannot connect to this network.  When I can't connect to the phone, I disable the personal hotspot, WiFi and Bluetooth on the phone and then I turn it back on.  I also turn off my WiFi adapter on my laptop and turn it back on.  Which usually solves the problem and then I can connect via WiFi.

    Do some research on the internet, I read that there was a file corrupted when the current generation of iTunes, but Apple had set and you just need to reinstall the current version, which I did.  I have reinstalled iTunes by suggestions from different site.  After reinstalling iTunes and restart, I can always have my phone to connect to internet via the USB cable.

    I want to be able to connect my laptop to the internet using my phone via the USB cable.  I want it all works just as it did previously.  Connection via WiFi is a pain in the ass, because it does not work half the time and disconnects on a regular basis.

    Please tell us what should I do to solve this problem.

    Thank you.

    OK, I finally understand how to solve this problem.

    I was able to understand because of this post:

    https://discussions.Apple.com/message/29267225#29267225

    The problem is that Windows 10 was not install appropriate drivers for my iPhone.

    You can see 2 places to see.  We're in the control panel.  After you plug in your iPhone, the iPhone will be displayed and highlighted as not having is not a compatible driver.  The other place is in "Devices and printers", there you will see 3 apple devices: 1 Apple Mobile Device USB Driver, iPhone 2, and 3. Apple iPhone.  All three appear when I plugged in my iPhone.

    However, the problem was one that said iPhone really should have said "Apple Mobile Device Ethernet".

    So, how to fix this?

    Open devices and printers-> right click Iphone which should be under "Unscpecified"-> properties-> hardware-> Propterties tab-> change settings-> tab driver-> update driver-> Browse my computer for software Local-> Browse to the directory "C:\Program Files\Common Apple Mobile Device Support".

    Make sure you have the files box to include under verified.

    Who did.  Windows successfully installed the necessary drivers.  Now, I can easily connect to the internet via the USB cable again without any problems.

Maybe you are looking for