Metric IGP into BGP MED copied.

Similar Questions

• I can't paste clip art into windows mail. (copied from word document - using IE8) How can I fix?

  I can't paste clip art into windows mail. (do not give me the option.)   I copied the clipart in Word document.  I use IE8, IE9, but unnstalled have in the hope of resolving the problem.   Thank you, Pam

  You cannot copy and paste images (especially the cliparts) of the word.  You need to refer to a disk image.  So use Insert | Picture to insert the image.  The image must also be a format that IE can display, as it is used to show messages in WinMail.

  IE9 is not a problem for that. See here for IE9 questions: www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#15

  Steve

• Original Site BGP attribute

  Dear friends,

  I tried to get a good understanding of the Site of origin of BGP attribute (not so EIGRP). I understand his idea and its impact, but there is a problem that I couldn't wrap my head around yet.

  Quoting RFC 4364, Section 8:

                       We add one more restriction on the distribution of    routes from PE to CE: if a route's Site of Origin attribute    identifies a particular site, that route must never be redistributed    to any CE at that site. 

  My understanding of this statement is that a site must be identifiable by a given value of the attribute of so, or in other words, there should be a way to assign a specific value of the attribute so to the entire site. Then, knowing the value of the so for the entire site, a route once appeared on this site should never be announced to him.

  This is where my problems start. We know that there is not a strict mapping one to one between a site and a VRF. A site can consist of one or several VRF and is not actually represented by a single object in the IOS - it's rather a simple collection of VRF who share routing information in such a way that for mutual communication, the use of the vertebral column is not required. There is no representation of the site as a single object in the IOS and there is therefore no way to assign a particular site so as a whole. In addition, the attribute so is not yet configured on a basis of by-VRF, instead, it is pushed on the individual courses from USING a road map or a per neighbor configuration. What is so attribute on a given prefix from, then? I simply do not see how a whole VRF or an entire site is assigned its own value of so unique for comparison purposes, in a manner similar to the assignment of identifiers of road or road of targets based on per VRF.

  So my question is: If the attribute so is pushed on routes from one THIS and these routes are announced to an another EP on the same site, how is the EP another knows the correct value of the site of the so so that it can compare to the so on prefixed receipt and not advertise routes to the site they came from? The VRF simply "inherits" the individual itineraries so as they are received and processed by a road-map set- ting so?

  Any help and clarification is appreciated!

  Best regards

  Peter

  Hi Peter,.

  So for BGP is "related" to THAT neighbor. Thus, when a prefix must be announced to a neighbor, we check the so of the prefix with the so of the BGP neighbor. For anything else, he is bound to the interface.

  The configuration can be done in four different ways (the setting of the so and the verification of the so is related to that):

  (1) ' road-map in ' on what neighboring BGP command

  (2) directly on the order of CE BGP neighbor

  (3) plan of the site on the interface of the VRF and redistribution of the (static) IGP into BGP routes and (static), IGP point to this interface

  (4) plan of the site on the command interface and network VRF

  General principle (but you know it):

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/iOS/ios_xe/iproute_bgp/configuration/guide/irg_neighbor_soo_xe.html

  With the help of a roadmap and setting different for different prefixes from the same neighbor BGP SoO doesn't make much sense, so I guess that we were never bothered by possible nonuniqueness in the configuration when you look at what a 'site' is.

  Thank you

  Luke

• BGP announcement: How do I remove the attributes "next hop" and "metrics" inherited from OSPF?

  Hello

  I use a router THAT WAN Cisco ASR1001 connected via BGP AS65075 with our ISP.

  This router is connected through OSPF with our Cisco 7206VXR/NPE-G2 firewall.

  Topology:

  ISP <- bgp="" -="">RT 1001 <- ospf="" -="">FW 7206 <->LAN

  On the WAN router, static routes are set to null0 to always announce our class C networks.

  Route IP 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 250

  ...

  Network guidelines are placed in our BGP configuration:

  router bgp 65075

  The log-neighbor BGP-changes

  neighbor EBGP-PEER-IPv4-peer group

  EBGP-PEER-IPv4 neighbor fall-over bfd

  neighbour 192.168.88.138 distance - as 65200

  192.168.88.138 a neighbor EBGP peers PEERS-IPv4

  192.168.88.138 ISP IPv4 neighbor description

  next password 192.168.88.138 7 unknown

  !

  ipv4 address family

  ...

  network 192.168.10.0

  ...

  a neighbor EBGP-PEER-IPv4 soft-reconfiguration inbound

  EBGP-PEER-IPv4 neighbor distribute-list prefix-v4 on

  an EBGP-PEER-IPv4 neighbor prefix-maximum 100

  neighbor EBGP-PEER-IPv4-1 filter list out

  neighbor 192.168.88.138 activate

  neighbor 192.168.88.138 filter-list 2

  output-address-family

  A part of these networs are also learned through OSPF. If these routes are present in the routing table:

  RT-01 #sh ro ip 192.168.10.0

  Routing for 192.168.10.0/24 entry

  Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, metric 1 forward

  Published by bgp 65075

  Last update to 192.168.0.79 on Port - channel1.28, 7w0d there is

  Routing descriptor blocks:

  * 192.168.0.79, from 192.168.0.71, 7w0d there is, through Port - channel1.28

  See metric: 20, number of share of traffic is 1

  Because these roads are active in the rounting table. Announcing BGP based on his and attributes "next hop" and "metric" are inherited from OSPF:

  RT-01 #sh ip bgp neighbors 192.168.88.138 announced-routes

  ...

  Network Next Hop path metrics LocPrf weight

  ...

  * > 192.168.10.0 192.168.0.79 20 32768 I

  ...

  Is it possible to remove the legacy of OSPF into BGP attributes?

  How to set the "next hop" to the value 0.0.0.0 and "metric" to 0?

  Thank you

  Best regards

  Jérôme

  Hello Berthier,

  NEXT_HOP is a hill & attribute mandatory path including the eBGP value is the IP address of the BGP peer (specified in the neighbor's remote control) where the router learns the prefix. Thus, your peers (eBGP) will still see the IP 192.168.88.138 in your BGP Next Hop as updates. I agree you the output of the command ' sh ip bgp neighbors 192.168.88.138 roads announced "can be confusing, but not worried about it.

  Metric 20 is cause of path must be acquired by OSPF. Copy in default atributte MED BGP metric. So I see that you have only a peer is very important change this value because MED is not transitive, if this value is not propagated by other ACE access your provider. Anyway, if you want to change, you must:

  1. create a list of prefixes with one or more prefixes that you want to "reset" the MED value:

  list of prefixes prefix-to-reset-MED seq 5 permit 192.168.10.0/24

  list of prefixes prefix-to-reset-MED seq 10 permit X.X.X

  2. create a roadmap

  allowed to reset - MED card route 5

  match of prefix-to-reset-MED IP prefix-list

  the metric value 0

  road map provided to zero-MED allowed 10

  !

  The last road map is necessary to ensure that the rest of the prefixes are sent.

  3. apply the road map

  a neighbor EBGP-PEER-IPv4-roadmap given to zero-MED on

  Concerning

• Why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?

  Can dear all, someone tell me why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?
  And I use GNS3 to this practice, the IOS Version: 12.4 (3)
  TKS...

  Back to the beginning:
  192.168.23.0/24 192.168.12.0/24
  RA(F0/0)-(f0/0) RB (s2/0) - RC (s2/0)
  [AS1]                    [AS2]                    [AS3]

  Configuration:
  * RA *:
  A #do sh run (config - router). b r b
  router bgp 1
  no synchronization
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
  192.168.12.2 neighbor remote-2
  setmed map of nearby route 192.168.12.2 out
  No Auto-resume

  IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

  setmed allowed 10 route map
  the metric value 20

  * RB *:
  B (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
  router bgp 2
  no synchronization
  BGP always-compare-med
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  BGP bestpath missing-as-worst med
  neighbor 192.168.12.1 distance-1
  neighbour 192.168.23.3 distance-3
  No Auto-resume

  * RC *:
  C (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
  router bgp 3
  no synchronization
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
  neighbour 192.168.23.2 distance-2
  No Auto-resume

  IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

  But when I checked out table RB bgp, as below:

  B (config - router) #do sh ip bgp
  BGP table version is 2, local router ID is 192.168.23.2
  Status codes: deleted, cushioning d s, history of h, * valid, > best, i - internal.
  r SIDE-failure, stale S
  Source codes: i - IGP, e - EGP,? -incomplete
  Network Next Hop path metrics LocPrf weight
  * > 1.1.1.0/24 192.168.23.3 0 0 3 I
  *                          192.168.12.1            20                         0  1 i

  The prefix is assigned a MED of 0, but also the best path value when I use "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" in how to configure bgp... :-(

  Please take a look at the discussion on the configuration of drugs to an eBGP neighbor:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/343397?TSTART=0

  Note that BGP MED is set to 0 even if the injected BGP route from a connected route.

  The first time I came across this problem sending MED was there in a picture of 5-6 years service provider. Routes were injected into BGP with the command 'network', has been validated by OSPF routes or static to null0. Involuntary consignment of drugs was mess with load balancing between 2 links of our inbound traffic from the same upstream service provider.

  Also note that if a route is learned via iBGP, border router removes MED before the road to advertising for an eBGP peers (i.e. the above comments apply a when a route is injected locally into the border and then router BGP sent to an eBGP peer).

  I don't know what the cause of the problem that you said in your last post. It delivers last for a long time or that it does not change after a while?

  p.s. Sorry, I edited post because I said "iBGP" instead of "eBGP" at some point.

• "bgp as path bestpath ignores" in 1006 ASR

  Hi all

  I want to configure BGP to ignore as the path for the best choice of path to the router ASR 1006. But in BGP configuration mode, this isn't the option as path access list. It's showing as unrecognized command.

  RTR1(config-router)#bgp bestpath ?
  compare-routerid  Compare router-id for identical EBGP paths
  cost-community    cost community
  igp-metric        igp metric
  med               MED attribute
  prefix-validate   Prefix origin validation
  RTR1(config-router)#
  

  IOS version details are:

  RTR1#sh ver
  Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(4)
  S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)
  Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Compiled Mon 23-Jul-12 20:02 by mcpre
  IOS XE Version: 03.07.00.S
  Cisco IOS-XE software, Copyright (c) 2005-2012 by cisco Systems, Inc.
  All rights reserved.  Certain components of Cisco IOS-XE software are
  licensed under the GNU General Public License ("GPL") Version 2.0.  The
  software code licensed under GPL Version 2.0 is free software that comes
  with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.  You can redistribute and/or modify such
  GPL code under the terms of GPL Version 2.0.  For more details, see the
  documentation or "License Notice" file accompanying the IOS-XE software,
  or the applicable URL provided on the flyer accompanying the IOS-XE
  software.
  ROM: IOS-XE ROMMON
  RTR1 uptime is 31 weeks, 17 hours, 51 minutes
  Uptime for this control processor is 31 weeks, 17 hours, 53 minutes
  System returned to ROM by reload
  System restarted at 23:29:29 IST Sat Apr 6 2013
  System image file is "bootflash:/asr1000rp2-adventerprisek9.03.07.00.S.152-4.S.bin"
  Last reload reason: PowerOn
  

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thanks to all in advance

  Irfan,

  The command can be hidden, but maybe it can be accepted if you type in its entirety. See here, this is a 2691 12.4 (15) T13 IOS:

  R1(config)#router bgp 1
  R1(config-router)#bgp bestpath ?
  compare-routerid  Compare router-id for identical EBGP paths
  cost-community    cost community
  med               MED attribute
  R1(config-router)#bgp bestpath as-path ?
  % Unrecognized command
  R1(config-router)#bgp bestpath as-path ignore ?
  % Unrecognized command
  R1(config-router)#bgp bestpath as-path ignore
  R1(config-router)#do show run | sec router bgp
  router bgp 1
  no synchronization
  bgp log-neighbor-changes
  bgp bestpath as-path ignore
  no auto-summary
  

  Best regards

  Peter

• Redistribution of BGP with EIGRP

  Hi all

  I'm trying to redistribute BGP, EIGRP, and vice versa. I'm succussfully EIGRP to BGP redistribution, but cannot get the EIGRP routes into BGP.

  Here is my config. Any guidance or help would be very appreciated.

  router eigrp 100
  network 10.18.72.0 0.0.0.255
  redistribute static route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE
  redistribute bgp 65535
  passive-interface default
  no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
  !
  router bgp 65535
  bgp router-id 172.18.2.1
  bgp log-neighbor-changes
  redistribute eigrp 100 route-map EIGRP_REDISTRIBUTE
  neighbor 172.18.2.2 remote-as 65535
  neighbor 172.18.2.2 password ciscobgp
  no auto-summary
  ip access-list extended EIGRP_ROUTES_TO_BGP
  permit ip any any
  !
  !
  ip prefix-list DEFAULT seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0
  !
  route-map EIGRP_REDISTRIBUTE permit 20
  match ip address EIGRP_ROUTES_TO_BGP
  !
  route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE permit 10
  match ip address prefix-list DEFAULT
  

  Thanks in advance.

  Neil

  Add "internal to redistribute bgp' in your bgp process. By default, iBGP redistributed in a PGI. The reason for this is simply the amount of roads that can receive a bgp router can overload an igp very easily, if you want to filter routes during this operation.

  After adding this, disable your bgp neighbors and you should start to see roads.

  HTH,
  John

  Please note all useful messages *.

• Difference between are created by default and 0.0.0.0 network in BGP

  Hello

  Please I need someone to clarify what is the difference between the command "come from default" and "network 0.0.0.0 - ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 null0" commands. I see both serve the same purpose by a default route to a counterpart of the advertising, but at the same time, I feel a difference on them.

  THX

  Kind regards

  B....

  Dear friends,

  Lingam summarizes the options to inject the default route in BGP very well. Thank you!

  In addition, let me point out a few differences between these approaches.

  The default information is created, redistribution from a different source and the network 0.0.0.0 are all similar in the resulting effect: they will inject the default route in BGP RIBS and it will be announced to all the BGP neighbors. The difference is originally from the default route that is injected into BGP:

  • default information is created causes the default route generated artificially and injected in the BGP RIB, launch to know if it is present in the routing table.
  • Redistribution and 0.0.0.0 network will inject the default route in BGP only if the default route is currently present in the routing table, and in addition in the case of redistribution, if learned by a specific protocol source we're redistribution of.

  The nearby X.X.X.X are created by default is different in that the default route is announced only this specific BGP neighbor and not to all the existing BGP neighbors as with previous approaches. The default route will not present in the BGP RIBS of the router that is configured with the command nearby X.X.X.X are created by default and so it will not usually be announced to all the BGP neighbors. At the same time, this command is similar to the default information are created in that the default route is generated artificially and didn't need to be present in the routing table.

  Lingam, let me correct a small inaccuracy: you wrote:

  The "network 0.0.0.0" command enables the router to advertise the default route because the router thinks that 0.0.0.0 is directly connected via Null0.

  In regards to the PMO, the network command does not seek for networks connected directly (as opposed to IGP protocols) but for the networks present in the routing table. They do not need to be directly connected. Properly, the statement should say:

  The command 'network 0.0.0.0' active router advertise the default route because the router has the 0.0.0.0/0 road shows in its routing table.

  Best regards

  Peter

• Exclude the network using BGP network command

  Hello:

  I am using BGP and I do redistribution of OSPF into BGP while I read the best way to do it is to use the network command.

  Now, I do the redistribution of OSPF in BGP using a list of prefixes that specifies the network to redistribute.

  Is possible to do so by the order of network?

  My network to redistribute is the 8.0.0.0 / 8 but the 8.0.0.0 / 16 is excluded.

  The IGP network is with specific directions of IP, so I think I also use the Auto-resume option or set the order of the aggregate-address.

  Another option that I prefer is to advertise the network into parts because some routers of entry to ACE are better for the first part of the network and the other are better in the second part. So I intend to announce that this networks.

  • 8.0.0.0 / 9 (excluding 8.0.0.0 / 16)
  • 8.128.0.0 / 9

  Thank you very much for your help. In this case, Juan.

  Hi you

  By default, network control announce only mask what u applied and it should be existed in the routing table.

  Another option, you can use the roadmap as well with the network command

  Respect,

  Kazim

  "Please miss me so useful post.

• Copy in a folder hidden in Win8.1 (64-bit)

  I have an extra set of data which, for some unknown reason, needs to go in the ProgramData directory on the C: drive. As this is a hidden directory, Admin permission must copy into it (wise precaution). However, rather than ask permission than the OS simply refuses to perform the task of me don't give a sign of "" when I try to use the drag-and - drop to copy the file and grizzled on the paste option when I try to use the copy-and - paste.

  My particular system sign me with my Microsoft account. Since then, I never remember guest to be implemented as specific administrator account I wonder if I have access to Admin work at all. If it turns out that I do now, how to deepen these functions?

  I am running 8.1 Windows 64 bit on a system with an i5 processor and 4 GB of RAM (I expect to move to 8 GB this week assuming that everything works, but that will not affect this situation). The data in question are not the kind of file that affects the function of the software in question, so there is no reason to think that it would be unwise to add to the directory (and it's a clean file). The program in question is called hero Lab and is an assistance program of player for tabletop role-playing games (used to create characters) - the file is a set of pre-made characters where examples can be imported into the program, copied and then adjusted. It goes in ProgramData so that it is accessible in the menu of the program.

  Hello

  You will probably have to TAKE POSSESSION of the ProgramData folder...

  As standard practice, what to do for my whole C; ------disc shortly after installing a new OS...

  You can find this in the Security tab of the properties, click the advanced down...

  You can click on EDIT and adds to permissions, but it is doubtful, if you get denied...

  Windows 8 is blocking things that previous operating system was not... at least as much...

  The fact that you are using a Microsoft Account and not a Local account means that you will get even more the message of type access denied...

• Admission control TE MPLS

  Hi people,

  I'm pretty new to the topic of MPLS TE, and I have a question for which I can't find an answer on my reading

  mpls_te.PNG

  

  Suppose we have the topology in the attached diagram

  IS - IS is used as the IGP; MP - BGP for VPN, EP to THIS eBGP East traffic

  Each link is a link 10 Mbps, 6 Mbps are used by YOU.

  each node has a master tunnel which has a default tunnel and a tunnel LLQ

  the metric of YOU was left by the default value (to the IGP metric)

  every single node a tunnel to all other nodes (mesh full tunnels)

  all tunnel interfaces have the config below

  interface Tunnel10

  Description you RX (Master)

  bandwidth 10000

  IP unnumbered Loopback0

  way of tunnel mpls traffic-eng

  tunnel destination 169.254.1.2

  highway tunnel mpls traffic-eng announce

  Master of exp-bundle tunnel mpls traffic-eng

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng exp-bundle Member Tunnel11

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng exp-bundle Member Tunnel12

  !

  interface Tunnel11

  Description you Rx (default)

  bandwidth 6000

  IP unnumbered Loopback0

  load-interval 60

  way of tunnel mpls traffic-eng

  tunnel destination 169.254.1.2

  highway tunnel mpls traffic-eng announce

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng 7 7 priority

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 4000

  dynamics of path-option 10 mpls traffic-eng tunnels

  mpls traffic-eng record-road tunnel

  mpls traffic-eng fast-diversion tunnel

  tunnel of mpls traffic-eng auto-bw frequency 300 setting threshold 5 max - bw 4000 min - bw 1000

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng default exp

  !

  interface Tunnel12

  Description you RX (LLQ)

  bandwidth 4000

  IP unnumbered Loopback0

  way of tunnel mpls traffic-eng

  tunnel destination 169.254.1.2

  highway tunnel mpls traffic-eng announce

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng 7 7 priority

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth under pool 2000

  dynamics of path-option 10 mpls traffic-eng tunnels

  mpls traffic-eng record-road tunnel

  mpls traffic-eng fast-diversion tunnel

  tunnel mpls traffic-eng exp 5

  My Questions are

  1. have the MPLS TE metric by default equal to the IGP metric and assuming that the path will R9 in R8 is still the best path from the point of view of the PGI

  the LSP used to get R1 to R9 is R1-R8-R9 and all the available bandwidth was used (6 Mbps), so we have 4 Mbit/s left on the R8 - R9

  R2-R8-R9 is the best way (best metric IGP/TE)

  When RSVP is reported the LSP to go to R2 to R9 is the FSA will be built using a least favorite way in terms of metrics or control that result in and admitted failure?

  2. bandwidth is sous-pool dedicated interface of main tunnel or Tunnel 12?

  Thank you very much in advance for your help

  Kind regards

  Mehdi

  HI Maria,

  I think Yes, because when RSVP message the way it send on all possible paths, in this case the best way not enough bandwidth and suboptimal Yes, the LSP is even on the suboptimal way.

  Who is King

• Dynamic routing for VPN Failover L2L

  Hello

  Can someone offer me some advice on this please?

  I have attached a simple diagram of our EXTENSIVE referral network.

  Overview

  • The firewall is ASA 5510 running 8.4 (9)
  • Basic to the Headquarters network uses OSPF
  • On ASA static routes are redistributed into OSPF
  • On ASA for VPN static routes are redistributed into OSPF with 130 metric so redistributed BGP routes are preferred
  • Basic network has a static route to 10.0.0.0/8 to Corporate WAN, which is redistributed into OSPF
  • Branch Office WAN uses BGP - routes are redistributed into OSPF
  • The branch routers using VRRP for redundancy of the IP for the default gateway of local customers.
  • Branch router main past off VRRP IP to router backup when the WAN interface is down
  • BO backup router (. 253) contains only a default route to the internet
  • In normal operation, the traffic to and from BO uses Local Branch Office WAN
  • If local BO WAN link fails, traffic to and from the BO uses IPSec VPN via public Internet

  I try to configure dynamic routing on our network for when a branch switches to the IPsec VPN. What I want to happen (not sure if it is possible) is for the ASA announce the subnet to the remote end of the VPN in OSPF to Headquarters.

  I managed to get this working using IPP, but for some reason any VPN stay up all the time when we are not in a failover scenario. This causes the ASA added the table as a static route is the remote subnet in it and do not use the announced route of OSPF from the core network. This prevents the BO customers access to the Internet. If I remove the IPP on the VPN setting, ASA learns the route to the subnet via the WAN BO - resumes normal operation.

  I have configured the metric of the static routes that get redistributed into OSPF by ASA superior to 110. This is so that the routes redistributed by the WAN BO OSPF BGP, are preferred. The idea being that when the WAN link is again available, the routing changes automatically and the site fails to WAN BO.

  I guess what I need to know is; This design is feasible, and if so where I'm going wrong?

  Thank you

  Paul

  Hi Paul,.

  your ASA maintains the tunnel alive only because this path exists on ASA.  This is why you must use IP - SLA on ASA to push network taffic "10.10.10.0/24" based on the echo response, using the ALS-intellectual property

  Please look at the example below, in the example below shows that the traffic flows through the tunnel, only if the ASA cannot reach the 10.10.10.0/24 network via the internal network of HQ.

  This configuration illuminate ASA.

  Route inside 10.10.10.0 255.255.2550 10.0.0.2 track 10

  (assuming 10.0.0.2 ip peering from inside the ip address of the router to HO)

  Route outside 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 254

  (value of 254 is a more expensive route to go via IPSec tunnel and x = the bridge by default-ISP)

  ALS 99 monitor

  type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.10.10.254 inside interface

  NUM-package of 3

  frequency 10

  Annex monitor SLA 99 life never start-time now

  track 10 rtr 99 accessibility

  Let me know, if this can help.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• Insert the file numbers

  How can I insert a file of numbers in my document pages? I tried to copy and paste, but the numbers file exceeds a single document page and document only adds a new page.

  Pages V5.6.2 only will allow you to insert PDF and image files supported.

  Select the cells of v3.6.2 of numbers that you want to appear in v5.6.2 Pages and then copy the selection to the Clipboard. Open Preview, then choose in the menu file: new from the Clipboard. You now have a PDF file that is not registered in the preview. You can then save the PDF file, and then drag and drop it into Pages, or copy the content of the PDF preview to the Clipboard and then paste them into Pages (in PDF).

  Once you have a PDF of your selection of worksheet Numbers in Pages v5.6.2, representation you can select the tab reorder and click the original size, scale and then rotate 90 degrees to fit the provision in the Portrait.

  If numbers v3.6.2 selection can be inserted in the layout of the portrait of Pages, and then select the cells in numbers, copy and paste in the Pages are possible. When you do so, Pages presents a menu of additional editing: entry of paste formula which is preferred over other results paste options when you want to keep the formulas. Pages won't allow rotation of the selected tables.

• deploy Firefox with localstore.rdf changed for all users

  Hi all
  I'm trying to deploy Firefox 24.3 ESR. I have configured the original menu of the toolbar to be without downloading and the menu bookmarks, leaving only the home button, but I can't figure out how to put the localstore.rdf changed in the files\user install profile when FF is run for the first time for this user. It maintains overwhelming. I put a copy in the \core\browser\defaults\profile installation location {source}, the installation copies to the new user profile, but when FF opens, it crushes him. I can copy in the mod file and use it then, but don't want to do this installation script, as happens in a finished format Thinapp.
  Everyone manages to force into a saved copy of localstore.rdf in a recent copy of FF
  I tried to follow this (http://mike.kaply.com/2012/03/30/customizing-firefox-default-profiles/), but the onmi.ja turns out to be broken.

  Thanks in advance

  I worked, I Thinapp FF.
  -Open capture
  -pre-scan
  -modified FF installation
  -Open FF
  -close FF
  -Copy of localstore.rdf in the user profile
  -After analysis
  -Save Thinapp

  FACT!

• HP Photosmart B110a: OCR

  Hello

  I have recently upgraded to Windows 10 and since then I cannot perform the following:

  I need to translate documents from French to English and it would usually

  I scan the document in a TIF file that would be saved in the my documents file, I would then go into documents and copy and paste the document into Google translate, but since the update the document goes into an image tool and I can't copy and paste.

  Can someone please help, I tried the upgrade of new readers, but it tells me that there are no more updates.

  I would be grateful if you could please not the technical answers.

  Thank you very much

  Try the free OCR programs on the web.

  Free OCR to Word or free OCR.

  They work very well.