Dynamic routing for VPN Failover L2L

Similar Questions

• Ontario Regulation distributes dynamic routes via VPN S2S

  Hi halijenn / experts

  (1) please let me know if IPP works on a Site in tunnel

  (2) I have a behind remote ASA 10.10.1.0 and 10.10.2.0 network that must be distributed to another branch ASA with S2S ASA remote via OSPF

  3) there is an L3 Switch behind the ASA of the branch and Switch L3 there is a router that has a default route pointing router WAN

  Router WAN
  |
  |
  Users-> router-> L3 Switch-> ASA-> Internet-> remote ASA branch (10.10.1.0, 2.0)

  Note: 10.10.1.0 2.0 AND are already configured in the ACL Crypto at the ends.

  Users are able to reach the 10.10.2.X network to the remote end.

  Now for the 10.10.2.0 static routes are already there in the router and the switch finally pointing the ASA branch however as the network grows, it is impossible in the router behind the switch to add static whenever routes (such as the default route to router WAN points). This is why in order to learn routes dynamically, I will add an ospf process to the ASA to branch with the following configuration. Please let me know if iam correct when I add IPP and other OSPF commands to the ASA of the branch. (hope I have nothing to do on ASA remote associated with IPP or OSPF?)

  I take just an example of a remote host 1 10.10.1.4. Inside ASA interface leading to users is 172.16.1.0/24

  access-list redistribute allowed standard host 10.10.1.4 255.255.255.255

  router ospf 1
  network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
  Journal-adj-changes
  redistribute static subnets redistribute route map

  In addition, I will also be allowing the order for IPP in the encryption of the VPN S2S said card.

  Please help me understand if I'm wrong

  Pls set the OSPF firstly on the SAA process before removing the static routes. Once you have confirmed that the OSPF is configured correctly and the roads are in the OSPF database, then you can delete the static routes. Static routes will always take precedence over OSPF because it has higher metric. Please keep the default route configured on the SAA.

  Hope that confirms it.

• Making the NAT for VPN through L2L tunnel clients

  Hi.I has the following situation in my network. We need for users who log on our site with the VPN clients to connect to another site via a tunnel L2L. The problem is that I need NAT addresses from the pool of VPN client in another beach before going on the L2L tunnel because on the other side, we have duplication of networks.

  I tried to do NAT with little success as follows:

  ACL for pool NAT of VPN:

  Extended list ip 192.168.253.0 access TEST allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Extended list ip 192.168.253.0 access TEST allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT:

  Global 172.20.105.1 - 172.20.105.254 15 (outdoor)

  NAT (inside) 15 TEST access-list

  CRYPTO ACL:

  allowed ro access list extended LAN ip 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  allowed ro access list extended LAN ip 255.255.0.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 172.20.105.0 RO allow extended access list 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 172.20.105.0 RO allow extended access list 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Am I missing something here? Something like this is possible at all?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  We use the ASA 5510 with software version 8.0 (3) 6.

  You need nat to the outside, not the inside.

  NAT (outside) 15 TEST access-list

• ASA does not propagate any routes for VPN users

  Good afternoon

  I m a problem concerning the spread of the roads to authenticated VPN users through the asa tunnel-group.

  I have a VPN-users-pool where my users receive their IP address, and after authentication and the tunnel is established the idea is that the user get to the networks defined in the following ACL:

  access-list within the standard allow 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list within the standard allow 192.168.15.0 255.255.224.0

  Now, the problem is that, after the tunnel is set up the only way, that the user receives is the default route (which is not supposed to be sent). The user does not receive the roads specified in the ACL list above. It has not received the network mask and assumes one 8 netmask (given that the pool of network from where it receives the IP address is a class A network).

  Network routing works as expected (when I add the static routes directly to PC users, everything works OK). It s just the matter of the ASA do not spread the roads as it should.

  Here is my split tunneling settings:

  attributes of Group Policy DefaultRAGroup

  VPN-idle-timeout 1

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec

  disable the PFS

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value inside

  (...)

  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value inside

  (...)

  Any ideas?

  I have apreciate your help

  Best regards

  Just a question, I see:

  attributes of Group Policy DefaultRAGroup

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value inside

  internal DefaultRAGroup_1 group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy DefaultRAGroup_1

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  It looks like your policy

  DefaultRAGroup_1 you set ACLs and the other doesn't seem to be for L2TP/IPSEC. How do you connect to the ASA, using L2TP/IPSEC or Cisco IPSEC client? In addition, if your users are devoted to this group policy:

  DefaultRAGroup_1 it looks like the acl is missing for the split tunneling

• The router configuration VPN VTI adding a third site/router

  Hello

  I currently have two cisco routers configured with a connection to a primary WAN interface and a connection to an Internet interface. I have a VPN configured using a VTI interface as a secondary path if the primary circuit WAN fails. IM also using OSPF as a dynamic routing protocol. Failover works and itineraries are exchanged. The question I have is that if I want to put a third-party router in this configuration I just add another interface tunnel with the tunnel proper Public source and destination IP and new IP addresses for a new tunnel network.
  The current configuration of the VTI is below:

  Any guidance would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  Andy

  Router1_Configurtation_VTI

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key Cisco12345 address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Crypto IPsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac T1

  Crypto IPsec profile P1

  game of transformation-T1

  !

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0

  IP ospf mtu - ignore

  load-interval 30

  tunnel source 1.1.1.1 Internet Source * Public

  2.2.2.1 tunnel * Public Destination Internet destination

  ipv4 IPsec tunnel mode

  profile P1 IPsec tunnel protection

  !

  Router2_Configuration_VTI

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key Cisco12345 address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Crypto IPsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac T1

  Crypto IPsec profile P1

  game of transformation-T1

  !

  interface Tunnel0

  10.0.1.2 IP address 255.255.255.0

  IP ospf mtu - ignore

  load-interval 30

  2.2.2.1 tunnel source * Source public Internet

  1.1.1.1 tunnel * Public Destination Internet destination

  ipv4 IPsec tunnel mode

  profile P1 IPsec tunnel protection

  Since this config is configuration of keys ISAKMP using address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 is not required for a new encryption key isakmp with the new address of the site. Simply configure the VTI on the new router and one or both of the existing routers.

  One of the aspects of this application that should consider the original poster, that's how they want data to flow when the third-party router is implemented. With both routers, you have just a simple point-to-point connection. When you introduce the third-party router do you want one of the routers to use hub? In this case, the hub router has tunnels each remote Ray. Each remote RADIUS has a tunnel to the hub. Talk about communication talk is possible but will have to go to the hub and then out to the other remote. The other option is a mesh configuration where each router has VTI tunnel to the other router.

  HTH

  Rick

• Policy NAT for VPN L2L

  Summary:

  We strive to establish a two-way VPN L2L tunnel with a partner. VPN traffic is one-to-many towards our partner, and our partner they need of a many-to-one to us (they need to access a host on our network). In addition, our partner has many VPN, so they force us to use a separate NAT with two private hosts addresses, one for each direction of the tunnel.

  My initial configuration of the tunnel on my grown up side of Phase 1, but not IPSec. Partner ran debug that revealed that my host did not address NAT'd in the NAT policy. We use an ASA5520, ver 7.0.

  Here is the config:

  # #List of OUR guests

  the OURHosts object-group network

  network-host 192.168.x.y object

  # Hosts PARTNER #List

  the PARTNERHosts object-group network

  network-host 10.2.a.b object

  ###ACL for NAT

  # Many - to - many outgoing

  access-list extended NAT2 allowed ip object-group OURHosts-group of objects PARTNERHosts

  # One - to - many incoming

  VIH3 list extended access permit ip host 192.168.c.d PARTNERHosts object-group

  # #NAT

  NAT (INSIDE) 2-list of access NAT2

  NAT (OUTSIDE) 2 172.20.n.0

  NAT (INSIDE) 3 access-list VIH3

  NAT (OUTSIDE) 3 172.20.n.1

  # #ACL for VPN

  access list permits extended VPN ip object-group objects PARTNERHosts OURHosts-group

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 192.168.c.d PARTNERHosts object-group list

  # #Tunnel

  tunnel-group type ipsec-l2l

  card <#>crypto is the VPN address

  card crypto <#>the value transform-set VPN

  card <#>crypto defined peer

  I realize that the ACL for the VPN should read:

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 172.20.n.0 PARTNERHosts object-group list

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 172.20.n.1 PARTNERHosts object-group list

  .. . If the NAT was working properly, but when this ACL is used, Phase 1 is not even negotiating, so I know the NAT is never translated.

  What am I missing to NAT guests for 172.20 addresses host trying to access their internal addresses via the VPN?

  Thanks in advance.

  Patrick

  Here is the order of operations for NAT on the firewall:

  1 nat 0-list of access (free from nat)

  2. match the existing xlates

  3. match the static controls

  a. static NAT with no access list

  b. static PAT with no access list

  4. match orders nat

  a. nat [id] access-list (first match)

  b. nat [id] [address] [mask] (best match)

  i. If the ID is 0, create an xlate identity

  II. use global pool for dynamic NAT

  III. use global dynamic pool for PAT

  If you can try

  (1) a static NAT with an access list that will have priority on instruction of dynamic NAT

  (2) as you can see on 4A it uses first match with NAT and access list so theoretically Exchange autour should do the trick.

  I don't see any negative consequences? -Well Yes, you could lose all connectivity. I don't think that will happen, but I can't promise if you do absolutely not this after-hours.

  Jon

• Why no implicit route for traffic from IPSec-L2L tunnel?

  In a hub-and-spoke IPSec environment, it is not difficult to implement routing by spoke to the hub.

  But on the side of the hub of a tunnel, where the gateway of last resort for traffic by spoke it, it seems almost counterintuitive than the ACL instructions and even cryptographic doesn't implicitly create a route for the traffic of the station in the tunnel at the end (talk).  It could always be replaced with a static if necessary.

  There is probably a good reason for this, but I can't think of it.  Or am I the only person who thinks it is strange... or maybe an opportunity to feature?

  Hello

  This feature exists and is called reverse road injection. The route is created dynamically (based on ACL Cryptography) and is only available when the SA is up.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gt_rrie.html

  HTH

  Laurent.

• Two links one for VPN Site to Site and another for internet on the same router configuration

  Hi all

  I have 2 internet links an ADSL and lease terminated on the same router. I need to configure ADSL for VPN site-to-site of HO and internet leased line dedicated for all users.

  my site IP subnet is 10.10.100.0/24 and HO subnet is 10.1.0.0/24.   Please find attached Config and advice it will be OK and works fine

  Thanks in advance...

  Mikael

  Hello

  For me, it looks like it has configured the route correctly;

  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet4 -> for all traffic to the internet.

  Road 10.1.0.0 ip 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 -> for vpn traffic to HO.
  

  The public_IP_HO must be defined according to the map of encryption using the set by the peers command.

  I want to add is on the isakmp policy hash attribute, you can choose between sha/md5 or whatever available on your device. Make sure that the isakmp policy to match political isakmp of your HO.

  The other thing is the acl for the internet. You may want to consider replacing the deny statement if you want to deny traffic only to your jar currently it is said to deny all traffic 10.10.100.0 10.0.0.0 network, not to the 10.1.0.0 HO (network).

  HTH,

• VPN failover to WAN, test

  Hello

  I had a previous post on this topic. After receipt of the resolution of the data center has added a new problem to my test plan.

  The purpose of this test VPN is ping on a real server, VPN tunnel through, without the possibility of remoest cause a crash.

  I have a switch 3750 L3 behind my firewall, and the default gateway is the firewall. I want to create an ip address of loopback on this unit for purposes of test for the VPN tunnel. I then will source a ping since the closure to the Ip address of the server to my remote data center. My EUGHEA links do not pass through the firewall.

  By the data center, they have routing configuration that all /10.0.0.0/8 address 192.168.0.0/16/ will be forwarded to their WAN EUGHEA affair. The States of data center

  I need to create a unique ip address to stock up the pings of the kind he will return the their Checkpoint fw, then the tunnel between us.

  I think the loopback address might look like this 100.255.255.1/32

  If I ping the ip address of server of the L3 switch with the loopback source address, it shuts down my WAN EUGHEA link because that's how routing is configured.

  The question is how can I hide the destination server, IP address so that the ping does not take the EUGHEA path but borrows the fw, then the tunnel?

  My thought is a 1-to-1 nat in the firewall of the server to DC.

  static (inside, outside) (Server natted ip) (the current server IP) subnet mask 255.255.255.255

  I then add this 'ip address of the server natted' VPN policy to the REMOTE NETWORK.

  natted ip address must also be an IP outside the 192.168.0.0/10.0.0. scopes

  This server natted ip address would be 100.255.254.1

  Then I could ping the loopback source. natted ip address

  A question I have is the remote data center will have to reverse nat on their end to allow the ping to reach the correct destination?

  Advice of experts for this very important issue.
  

  Hello

  You speak of a firewall and L3 switch configuration. You also talk EUGHEA which I do not know what that means? You just talk to a separate VPN device? A simple network diagram could clear the configuration for a lot of people reading this post.

  If I understand the installation program, then you have a link dedicated between your site and data center site. And you want to add is that there is a path between these networks over a VPN L2L connection also.

  But if that's the case I still don't know how this VPN L2L would be used between the sites.

  If you really want to get a redundancy between the 2 sites, it would be better if you can run that a dynamic routing between each connection protocol and that looks like the L3 device at each end through which link/connection, they should reach the other site.

  In this configuration it seems to me that you'd have to hide the IP addresses of the two network in order to use the VPN at the same time, while the real dedicated connection is in use.

  -Jouni

• Traffic of Client VPN routing via VPN Site to Site

  Hello

  We have the following scenario:

  • Office (192.168.2.x)
  • Data Center (212.64.x.x)
  • Home workers (192.168.2.x) (scope DHCP is in the office subnet)

  Connections:

  • Desktop to Data Center traffic is routed through a Site at IPSec VPN, which works very well.
  • Welcome to the office is routed through a Site IPSec VPN Client.

  The question we have right now, is the Client VPN works, and we have implemented a split tunnel which includes only the subnet of the Office for a list of network.

  What I have to do, is to route all traffic to home' to 'Data Center' by site to Site VPN is configured.

  I tried to add the ranges of IP data center to the list of Client VPN Split tunnel, but when I do that and try to connect at home, I just get a "connection timed out" or denied, as if she was protected by a firewall?

  Could you please let me know what I missed?

  Result of the command: "show running-config"
  : Saved
  :
  ASA Version 8.2(5)
  !
  hostname ciscoasa
  domain-name skiddle.internal
  enable password xxx encrypted
  passwd xxx encrypted
  names
  name 188.39.51.101 dev.skiddle.com description Dev External
  name 192.168.2.201 dev.skiddle.internal description Internal Dev server
  name 164.177.128.202 www-1.skiddle.com description Skiddle web server
  name 192.168.2.200 Newserver
  name 217.150.106.82 Holly
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/4
  shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/5
  shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/6
  shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/7
  shutdown
  !
  interface Vlan1
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Vlan2
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  ip address 192.168.3.250 255.255.255.0
  !
  !
  time-range Workingtime
  periodic weekdays 9:00 to 18:00
  !
  ftp mode passive
  clock timezone GMT/BST 0
  clock summer-time GMT/BDT recurring last Sun Mar 1:00 last Sun Oct 2:00
  dns domain-lookup inside
  dns server-group DefaultDNS
  name-server Newserver
  domain-name skiddle.internal
  same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
  object-group service Mysql tcp
  port-object eq 3306
  object-group protocol TCPUDP
  protocol-object udp
  protocol-object tcp
  object-group network rackspace-public-ips
  description Rackspace Public IPs
  network-object 164.177.132.16 255.255.255.252
  network-object 164.177.132.72 255.255.255.252
  network-object 212.64.147.184 255.255.255.248
  network-object 164.177.128.200 255.255.255.252
  object-group network Cuervo
  description Test access for cuervo
  network-object host Holly
  object-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_1 tcp
  port-object eq www
  port-object eq https
  object-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_2 tcp
  port-object eq www
  port-object eq https
  object-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_3 tcp
  port-object eq www
  port-object eq https
  object-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_4 tcp
  port-object eq www
  port-object eq https
  access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any
  access-list outside_access_in remark ENABLES Watermark Wifi ACCESS TO DEV SERVER!
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp 188.39.51.0 255.255.255.0 interface outside object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_4 time-range Workingtime
  access-list outside_access_in remark ENABLES OUTSDIE ACCESS TO DEV SERVER!
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_3
  access-list outside_access_in remark Public Skiddle Network > Dev server
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 interface outside eq www
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp object-group rackspace-public-ips interface outside eq ssh
  access-list outside_access_in remark OUTSIDE ACCESS TO DEV SERVER
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp object-group Cuervo interface outside object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1 inactive
  access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 host dev.skiddle.internal object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_2 inactive
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark HTTP OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq www
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark HTTPS OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq https
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark SSH OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq ssh
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark MYSQL OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any host 164.177.128.200 object-group Mysql
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark SPHINX OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any host 164.177.128.200 eq 3312
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark DNS OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit object-group TCPUDP host Newserver any eq domain
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark PING OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit icmp any any
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark Draytek Admin
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 eq 4433
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark Phone System
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 eq 35300 log disable
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark IPSEC VPN OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit udp any host 94.236.41.227 eq 4500
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark IPSEC VPN OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit udp any host 94.236.41.227 eq isakmp
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark Office to Rackspace OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark IMAP OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq imap4
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark FTP OUT
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq ftp
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark FTP DATA out
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq ftp-data
  access-list inside_access_in_1 remark SMTP Out
  access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit tcp any any eq smtp
  access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips
  access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0
  access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips
  access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any 192.168.2.128 255.255.255.224
  access-list inside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips
  access-list outside_1_cryptomap_1 extended permit tcp 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips eq ssh
  access-list RACKSPACE-cryptomap_1 extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 object-group rackspace-public-ips
  access-list RACKSPACE-TEST extended permit ip host 94.236.41.227 any
  access-list RACKSPACE-TEST extended permit ip any host 94.236.41.227
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel remark Inside for VPN
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel standard permit 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel remark Rackspace
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel standard permit 164.177.128.200 255.255.255.252
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel remark Rackspace
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel standard permit 164.177.132.16 255.255.255.252
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel remark Rackspace
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel standard permit 164.177.132.72 255.255.255.252
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel remark Rackspace
  access-list InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel standard permit 212.64.147.184 255.255.255.248
  pager lines 24
  logging enable
  logging console debugging
  logging monitor debugging
  logging buffered debugging
  logging trap debugging
  logging asdm warnings
  logging from-address [email protected]/* */
  logging recipient-address [email protected]/* */ level errors
  mtu inside 1500
  mtu outside 1500
  ip local pool CiscoVPNDHCPPool 192.168.2.130-192.168.2.149 mask 255.255.255.0
  ip verify reverse-path interface inside
  ip verify reverse-path interface outside
  ipv6 access-list inside_access_ipv6_in permit tcp any any eq www
  ipv6 access-list inside_access_ipv6_in permit tcp any any eq https
  ipv6 access-list inside_access_ipv6_in permit tcp any any eq ssh
  ipv6 access-list inside_access_ipv6_in permit icmp6 any any
  icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  icmp permit any outside
  no asdm history enable
  arp timeout 14400
  global (outside) 1 interface
  nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
  nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  static (inside,outside) tcp interface www dev.skiddle.internal www netmask 255.255.255.255
  static (inside,outside) tcp interface ssh dev.skiddle.internal ssh netmask 255.255.255.255
  access-group inside_access_in in interface inside control-plane
  access-group inside_access_in_1 in interface inside
  access-group inside_access_ipv6_in in interface inside
  access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
  route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.254 10
  timeout xlate 3:00:00
  timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
  timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
  dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
  aaa authentication telnet console LOCAL
  aaa authentication enable console LOCAL
  http server enable 4433
  http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  http 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  no snmp-server location
  no snmp-server contact
  snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
  crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
  crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 86400
  crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs group1
  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-3DES-MD5 ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5
  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set security-association lifetime seconds 28800
  crypto map outside_map 1 match address RACKSPACE-cryptomap_1
  crypto map outside_map 1 set pfs
  crypto map outside_map 1 set peer 94.236.41.227
  crypto map outside_map 1 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA
  crypto map outside_map 1 set security-association lifetime seconds 86400
  crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
  crypto map outside_map interface outside
  crypto ca trustpoint _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
  crl configure
  crypto ca certificate chain _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
  certificate ca xxx
  quit
  crypto isakmp enable outside
  crypto isakmp policy 10
  authentication crack
  encryption aes-256
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 20
  authentication rsa-sig
  encryption aes-256
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 30
  authentication pre-share
  encryption aes-256
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 40
  authentication crack
  encryption aes-192
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 50
  authentication rsa-sig
  encryption aes-192
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 60
  authentication pre-share
  encryption aes-192
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 70
  authentication crack
  encryption aes
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 80
  authentication rsa-sig
  encryption aes
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 90
  authentication pre-share
  encryption aes
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 100
  authentication crack
  encryption 3des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 110
  authentication rsa-sig
  encryption 3des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 120
  authentication pre-share
  encryption 3des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 130
  authentication crack
  encryption des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 140
  authentication rsa-sig
  encryption des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  crypto isakmp policy 150
  authentication pre-share
  encryption des
  hash sha
  group 2
  lifetime 86400
  telnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  telnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  telnet timeout 5
  ssh timeout 5
  console timeout 0
  dhcpd auto_config outside
  !
  dhcprelay server 192.68.2.200 inside
  threat-detection basic-threat
  threat-detection scanning-threat
  threat-detection statistics host
  threat-detection statistics access-list
  threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept rate-interval 30 burst-rate 400 average-rate 200
  ntp server 194.35.252.7 source outside prefer
  webvpn
  port 444
  svc image disk0:/anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 1 regex "Intel Mac OS X"
  group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes
  vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec webvpn
  group-policy skiddlevpn internal
  group-policy skiddlevpn attributes
  dns-server value 192.168.2.200
  vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
  split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  split-tunnel-network-list value InternalForClientVPNSplitTunnel
  default-domain value skiddle.internal
  username bensebborn password *** encrypted privilege 0
  username bensebborn attributes
  vpn-group-policy skiddlevpn
  username benseb password gXdOhaMts7w/KavS encrypted privilege 15
  tunnel-group 94.236.41.227 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 94.236.41.227 ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *****
  tunnel-group skiddlevpn type remote-access
  tunnel-group skiddlevpn general-attributes
  address-pool CiscoVPNDHCPPool
  default-group-policy skiddlevpn
  tunnel-group skiddlevpn ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *****
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  message-length maximum client auto
  message-length maximum 512
  policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect dns preset_dns_map
  inspect ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect h323 ras
  inspect rsh
  inspect rtsp
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect skinny
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect sip
  inspect netbios
  inspect tftp
  inspect ip-options
  policy-map global-policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect icmp
  inspect icmp error
  inspect ipsec-pass-thru
  inspect ftp
  !
  service-policy global_policy global
  smtp-server 164.177.128.203
  prompt hostname context
  call-home reporting anonymous
  Cryptochecksum:6c2eb43fa1150f9a5bb178c716d8fe2b
  : end
  

  You must even-Security-enabled traffic intra-interface to allow communication between vpn VPN.

  With respect,

  Safwan

  Remember messages useful rate.

• PIX and ASA static, dynamic and RA VPN does not

  Hello

  I am facing a very interesting problem between a PIX 515 and an ASA 5510.

  The PIX is in HQ and has several dynamic VPN connections (around 130) and IPsec vpn remote works very well. I had to add a PIX to ASA L2L VPN static and it does not work as it is supposed to be. The ASA 5510, at the remote end, connects and rest for a small period of time, however, all other VPN connections stop working.

  The most interesting thing is that ASA is associated with the dynamic map and not the static map that I created (check by sh crypto ipsec his counterpart x.x.x.x). However, if I make any changes in the ACL 'ACL-Remote' it affects the tunnel between the PIX and ASA.

  Someone saw something like that?

  Here is more detailed information:

  HQ - IOS 8.0 (3) - PIX 515

  ASA 5510 - IOS 7.2 (3) - remote provider

  Several Huawei and Cisco routers dynamically connected via ADSL

  Several users remote access IPsec

  A VPN site-to site static between PIX and ASA - does not.

  Here is the config on the PIX:

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

  Dyn - VPN game 100 Dynamics-card crypto transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec

  Crypto dynamic-map Dyn - VPN 100 the value reverse-road

  VPN - card 30 crypto card matches the ACL address / remote

  card crypto VPN-card 30 peers set 20 x. XX. XX. XX

  card crypto VPN-card 30 the transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec value

  VPN crypto card - 100 - isakmp dynamic Dyn - VPN ipsec

  interface card crypto VPN-card outside

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  crypto ISAKMP policy 65535

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  access list ACL-remote ext ip 10.0.0.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Thank you.

  Marcelo Pinheiro

  The problem is that the ASA has a crypto acl defined between host and network, while the remote end has to the network.

  Make sure that the acl is reversed.

• PIX515 &amp; dynamic routing

  Central office:

  LAN - 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0

  PIX 515 - int branches - branches (through the cloud of MPLS VPN)

  internal int - LAN

  int outdoors - WAN

  Branch:

  LAN - 10.20.16.0.255.255.255.0

  C1760 - int s0/0 - Central officr (through the cloud of MPLS VPN)

  PIX501 - int outdoors - WAN

  internal int - LAN

  The PIX515, I had a static route to the path to service-

  Route of the branches 10.20.16.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.16.1 1

  I want up VPN channel between PIX501 (int outside) of the Executive Board and the Central PIX515(int outside).

  To do this, I created card crypto to PIX515 and ACL:

  outside_crypto_map_10 ip 10.20.0.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.20.16.0 255.255.255.0

  card crypto 10 TEST matches the address outside_crypto_map_10

  Here my question: I want to remove static route of PIX515 and use dynamic routing, but I hesitated because I have ACLs for VPN, where branch destination LAN (and will serve as an int on the outside) and dynamic road that shows the way to the domestic LAN through branches int PIX515. How this will be live together? And what will be used first - road or ACL?

  The PIX can run RIP and OSPF today, but not those of a VPN. If you want to learn routes dynamically through the VPN you can do that, so you need to use static routes instead. Looks like you might be interested by the DMVPN function in IOS routers.

  Routing, regarding all the traffic that you want to use a VPN must first be routed on an interface that has the appropriate encryption card applied, then if this traffic matches an ACL encryption card it will be encrypted and sent to the corresponding VPN peer. That's to say routing goes first for the outbound VPN traffic, then encryption. No matter if channels are static or learned dynamically, except, as I mentioned above, you can now run a routing through a VPN Protocol in the PIX.

  Does that help?

• VPN failover between the ASA

  I do a search in the search of the best solution for switching between two ASA and hoped that someone wants to point me in the right direction.

  The situation is this, we got:

  -Head Office 2:

  Each is equipped with an ASA 5505

  -10 branches

  Each is equipped with a 887 integrated services router.

  Each is BranchOffice must have a redundant VPN connection at the headquarters of these two, and they all need to use the first person as main and the other in high school. In case of failure, all branches need to use the second connection VPN going the second seat.

  In my research, I'm looking for the best possible solution, with faster failover, but have no idea where to start my research.

  I hope someone has a good answer for this one.

  Thank you very much in advance,

  Kind regards

  Dwayne

  I do not understand why people continue to use ASA devices for VPN endpoint.  the ASA is NOT designed for complex VPN scenarios.  It is designed for simple scenarios.  In terms of VPN by using comparison, ASA is a person with a basic education while Cisco IOS is like a person with a college degree.

  For the scenario, you will be much better using Cisco IOS routers everywhere, where you can implement the GRE/IPSec or DMVPN.  Both cases will be sastify to your needs.

• S2S VPN Failover

  In the case where we have 2 routers each with a WAN link provided by the only ISP we can configure HSRP with SSO for the classical solutions IPSEC failover. But in a case where there are 2 routers but differ from the WAN links (services provider) we will not be able to use HSRP because the IP (subnet) will be different and assign a virtual ip address that is impossible.

  In this case, this type of the best possible solution for the recovery of link to function? ASIT with cryptographic cards? because in this case we can do 2 tunnels each with different source and IPSLA or dynamic routing routes of change for a failover.

  If you want to route based on the source IP address that some sources are going through the tunnel and not others?

  That could be solved with the policy based routing.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• Please help to configure the router for internet connection 871W!

  Hello world!

  I just started styding for CCNA, so I'm totally new to Cisco stuff. Recently bought a router 871W and spent two days in a row trying to configure internet connection with no luck! I use the port console for the configs and SDM/CCP. Would be greateful if someone could tell me how to do simple configs of internet connection. I googled everything but it's still confusing. I can't assing all-IP ports FA 0-3. I used instead of the VLAN. But all tutorials use FA0 and when I try to assign an IP address to FA0 it gives me some L2 cannot be assigned or something... :/ And I am also confused at what address IP use for WAN.

  I connected the cable between the Modem and the LAN of the PC port and copied some IP addresses which I think I have to use to configure the router for internet connection. And here they are:

  ISP IP: 76.114.54.255

  SUBNET: 255.255.248.0

  GATEWAY: 76.114.48.1

  DHCP: 69.252.97.4

  DNS: 75.75.75.75

  75.75.76.76

  If you can, please help! Thank you!

  Hi david,

  Looks like your 871w can not get a dynamic IP address: % unknown DHCP problem... No possible allocation

  you could ask your ISP to perform a reset/clear MAC add and try again?

  also, kindly post lastest "show run".

  Edit: just to see you've updated your screenshot. could you add command under 4

  Mac-add 0001.4af9.8b83