MULTIPLE IP ADDRESSES

Similar Questions

• How to send UDP packets to multiple IP addresses

  I can see the full dissemination of forwarding UDP (IP value FFFFFFFF) but I do not see how to send the UDP packet even two or three specified multiple IP addresses.

  Is it still possible?

  Thank you

  Pawel says:

  The multicast would work with other receivers of udp (no-LabVIEW) operating in a mode normal unitcast? Or all networking needs receivers operate in multicast mode?

  Clients must join a multicast group in order for the multicast work. This essentially means that you tell the OS you want traffic received on a specific IP address (multicast groups are the IP addresses within a specific range) and on a specific network interface.

• EA6500 multiple IP addresses on the Internet interface

  I have verizon fios business with 5 static IP addresses and am set up for ethernet wan. I can use EA6500 as the router instead of use the own router to Verizon, but I can't understand how to assign every 5 static IP on the internet interface addresses. I have already affected the first IP address in the Web interface, but don't see a way to add multiple IP addresses internet interface or NAT section where I can create static NAT.

  Is it still possible with EA6500? If so, how?

  I don't think it's possible, given that the router support 1 address static IP at a time.

• From single to multiple IP addresses external IP traffic internal

  We are transitioning to a Symantec SMS to a Cisco ASA 5505, and I'm running into a lot of trouble to replicate our configuration for inbound traffic. We currently have a Setup something like this:

  (Of course I pick up a bunch of arbitrary numbers here.)

  1.2.3.4 port one--> 10.1.0.1 port one

  1.2.3.4 port b--> 10.1.0.5 port b

  1.2.3.4 port x--> 10.1.0.20 port p

  1.2.3.4 port is--> 10.1.0.21 p port

  1.2.3.4 port z--> 10.1.0.22 p port

  1.2.3.4 is the unique external IP address we use for traffic that passes through, and 10.1.0.x internal host. x, y and z are ports chosen arbitrarily in a sequence.

  I'm doing it via the ASDM. The ASA is running 9.1 2 software and I use ASDM 7.1 (3). I'm trying to accomplish this by using Configuration > firewall > public servers.

  What I do is the following:

  1. In Configuration > firewall > objects > network objects/groups, create objects for the external IP address and all internal hosts.
  2. In Configuration > firewall > objects > objects/Service groups, create objects TCP ports x y z, and a TCP object for p port (which is not in the default set). Protocols on ports a and b are in the game by default, so they do not need to be defined.
  3. In Configuration > firewall > public servers, add a series of entries of public server with the external host as public IP, address the external interface as the public Interface, the internal as the private Interface interface, the host in question as IP address private, and in the case the two first entries, the protocol chosen as the private service sector. In the case of the last of three entries, I also selects "public address specify if it is different from the private Service. This will allow the static PAT. "I then selects the associated service from port p as the private Service and the service associated with the ports x, y or z (respectively) in the public service.

  .. .or at least, that's what I'm trying to do. I have encountered the following problems:

  1. If I do not use 'Specify the public address if different of the private service', the first mapping I do works very well and pass the traffic correctly. If I do, it does not. (I'm testing it trying to connect from the outside and I get a connection in the case of the former, but not in the latter scenario.) I generally choose tcp/aol as my test "public service" and are trying to connect to the external IP address on port 5190, which is the port for tcp/aol.)
  2. At the time wherever I try to do a second mapping, the system rejects saying «server address configuration comes into conflict with a rule of existing translation»
  3. Even if it worked, when I select "Public address specify if it is different from the private service", it only shows me the list of integrated service objects, not everything I've created. This isn't really the end of the world - I could divert just a series of services that we do not - but it would be nice if I could get actually ports my users are already using so that I could make a transparent exchange rather than giving them all the new connection information.

  Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. I guess I'm missing something pretty obvious, but I'm not that knowledgeable about the Cisco ASA family at this point, I can probably use a few pointers get this working.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  There's something really weird happens with the end of your post. The second section of numbered points has its text completely messed. The lines of text are on top of eachother.

  I don't personally use the ASDM at all to configure ACL and NAT configurations.

  I could help with the configuration of CLI format however.

  Seems that you are trying to configure static PAT (Port Forwarding) for several internal hosts using the public IP address unique who will be on the external interface of the ASA.

  In general, you can use this format for all NAT configurations

  network of the object

  host

  NAT tcp service interface static (inside, outside)

  Naturally, the names of the interface may be different and could be "udp" instead of "tcp". Also since you can configure a large number of these I suggest you come up with a clear policy naming for your 'network of the object' so that they are easy to read and to clarify the purpose.

  Each 'object' that is created can be used on your external interface ACL to allow traffic. However if you want to configure a large number of these configurations PAT static and there are several ports for host even then it might be easier to make different 'object' to be used in the ACL list or it can be annoying.

  Could resemble a basic ACL corresponding to the "nat" above configuration rule

  access list permit tcp any eq object

  Once again the ACL above may look different in your use. You can limit the traffic of certain source addresses that would mean multiple ACL lines.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• LUN with multiple IP addresses

  I have two questions actually. The first one being: I have a machine running OpenFiler with 3 iSCSI targets. This machine has two network cards with its own IP address. There are two ESX hosts. Currently in each, I added a new datastore VMFS among those LUNS and then added two more as extensions to this VMFS datastore. This is reflected on the hosts and all using only one of the IP addresses of the exploitation of SAN and openfiler Vmotion between two hosts. Could I take a host and add the LUNS through the second IP address and ESX still not see it as a shared storage for as each host could access the same LUN via treated separate IP and have still Vmotion works through them? If so, exactly how this would and would there be predictable performance/stability problems?

  Second, what sort of questions would be that we are facing if I place a second physical machine running OpenFiler and added the LUNS on this second box as extensions to the same data store? Theoretically, this should create the massive data store over two physical and accessible machines as a store of data shared by both ESX hosts. Thoughts?

  NOTE: I know that we can paste the two network cards in the SAN, but we had a lot of performance/stability problems when we had the machine running a linux distro standard with servile NIC and an NFS share as the data store. I also came across reliabillity issues when you try to bond in OpenFiler where I could access the web interface and then it would become randomly inaccessible and then later come back online and back. Whatever it is, we are witnessing a DRASTIC increase in performance on this unique nic with openfiler LUN iSCSI on any other scenario, we had Setup.

  In fact, Yes. Make sure that IP addresses are on different subnets for interfaces A and B:

  ESX-VMK1 192.168.100.5 = talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254
  ESX-VMK2 = 192.168.200.5 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254

  Under NO circumstances should you use the same subnet for the multiple interfaces...

  If you have TWO ESX hosts, you can cross-available network cards so HostA 'prefer' subnet-1 and host b "prefer" subnet-2:

  ESX-A-VMK1 = 192.168.100.5 talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254 (preferably manually in the LUN path)
  ESX-B-VMK1 = 192.168.100.6 talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254

  and

  ESX-A-VMK2 = 192.168.200.5 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254
  ESX-B-VMK2 = 192.168.200.6 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254 (preferably manually in the LUN path)

  This arrangement gives you the bandwidth "dedicated" without losing the redundancy in case a card NETWORK goes down on one of the three hosts... If the subnet 1 becomes unusable (i.e. your D-Link switch dies) then a failover to the other switch will happen auto-magiquement.)

  If you find my comments useful, please assign points. Thank you.

  -Collin C. MacMillan

  SOLORI - Oriented Solution, LLC

  http://blog.Solori.NET

• How can I combine multiple lists addresses in a list in my Thunderbird AddressBook?

  None seems to be necessary.

  Opens the address book
  View of the Tower in the pane directory if it is not already.
  Pane view-Layout-directory
  Select the address book contacts YOU're moving to show in the main window
  Select the contact or contacts you want to move.
  Drag the contacts to the new address book folder and drop them there.

  Selection of a contact and then pressing CTRL + a will select all.

  The personal book and the collected book Thunderbird by default and can not be deleted.

• Can I create multiple notebooks address with some of the same people in more than one case?

  I have several addresses for different accounts books. I can move people in an address book, however, which removes them from the first. I want to be able to 'copy' instead of 'move', while some are at more than one address book.

  Hold down the CTRL key while dragging from an address book to another.

• BlackBerry Smartphones Multiple Calendar/Address Book Synch problems

  New torch, using 1 month.

  Well At & T. works usage provider. Former user of Windows mobile. New to blackberry.

  Had already existing Outlook calendar and list of Outlook contacts.

  Using the email four accounts on phone (verizon.net (Outlook), Gmail x 2 and hotmail.com)

  Trying to avoid having to restart the phone back to the factory setting and try again.

  My Outlook to synchronize to my gmail on phone contacts list which in turn double my contacts list because has already synched to my list of contacts from at & t on the phone. The software does not recognize the list of contacts of at & t on the phone, wants only sych to gmail one.

  My calendar wants to sync to all Calenders and in turn have multiple copies of the appointments for the same day/month/year.

  I don't have a wireless sync to one of the accounts.

  Can I delete certain contact and/or calendar on the phone to prevent multiple synchronization to all accounts on the phone?

  Tried default calendar (doesn't), unable to the list of default contacts (no option for this).

  Have deleted all the emails, accounts, but their corresponding list of contacts and calendars will not disappear, even after re-booting.

  Is there any resolution? Or do I just start and resume phone to the factory settings and sych from scratch? I have all the necessary data on my PC.

  Thank you for your help.

  
  

• Rule for VCS looking to account for multiple IP addresses

  It is possible to specify several IP addresses in a search rule? Basically, I want to have a search rule can reach any server of CUCM, without having to recreate the search rule X the number of times for each Subscriber.

  THX

  RF

  Hey rf,.

  Check:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/config_guide/Cisco_VCS_Cisco_Unified_Communications_Manager_Deployment_Guide_CUCM_8_9_and_X7-2.PDF

  Considers that this review especially Appendix 4 (page 40,...)

  You can configure cucm (needs to support areas) using a neigbor area, if you

  can add the IP addresses of the cluster in the area and point to it the rule of research.

  The rule of research itself can only match on a ground but not fork the call to do different destinations incl. change of address

  (if I understood you right here).

  I had made a request to feature some time ago to clone the searchrules and other parts of the config,

  via the Web interface, which could be handy to help you generate several quite similar search rules.

  The best way to do so is to use the cli, empty your rule to work, modify it and add a new

  rule with additional content.

  Please note the validations and set the thread solved if it is.

• WIndows Server with multiple IP addresses in different VLANS

  What I'm trying to achieve: -.

  A Server Windows 2008 R2 Virtual machine with of 6 vNIC each with an IP different address of VLAN different & connected to the corresponding ports on VIRTUAL LAN group.

  Now how to make sure that traffic is properly flowing as traffic for VLAN specific are coming and get out of that vnic so that it can flow through port designated group

  As a single gateway can be mentioned, I guess we need to add static routes for that to work, but if it's static routes, then please explain to me how these roads will need to be added for each IP address.

  Or if there is another way to make her even if you please let me know.

  
  

  Thanks in advance...
  

  
  

  I was wondering what I really need to add roads since I am not asking that two different VLAN is talking to each other. Guess that's when I need the static routes.

  I guess in this case if I have 3 NIC with 3 different IP addresses would not be the traffic corresponding VLAN will come automatically the corresponding card.

  That would not be in the range 1.2.3.x traffic flows automatically NIC1 & 5.6.7.x runs automatically NIC2 & etc.?

• Script to get multiple IP addresses by vm?

  Hello

  I have several virtual machines with vNIC 2 or even 3, each with different ips, I'm trying to get the list of the vm name, different IP addresses and the dns name, is it possible?

  I found a script and modified some parts, but I don't have the first IP.

  $VMs = get - VM
  {foreach ($VM to $VMs)
  $VM = get-view $VM.ID
  $nm = $VM.name
  $hn = $VM.guest.hostname
  $ip = $VM.guest.ipaddress
  $vm | Select @{Name = 'Name'; Expression = {$nm}}, @{Name = "Hostname"; Expression = {$hn}}, @{Name = 'IP address'; Expression = {$ip}}
  }

  Thank you!

  The only difference I see is that my script retrieves the IP addresses of the object of comments.

  Which is only filled when the VMware tools are installed.

  Which could explain the difference?

  Maybe try my script but then with $_. IpAddress, so instead of $_. Guest.IpAddress.

• Can a VPN 3005 cause multiple IP addresses on the external interface?

  Nice day

  Can a VPN 3005 cause several IPS on an external interface?

  I expect to use it in an environment that has 2 ADSL connections to an internet service provider. For the sake of the exercise, we could call them ROUTER1 and ROUTER2.

  We have a few VPN we always want to spend by ROUTER1 and some VPN we always want going through ROUTER2.

  Is this possible?

  Thank you very much

  No, not possible, sorry.

• Tunneling split with Web sites that have multiple IP addresses

  Hundreds of famous sites (such as YouTube and Facebook) are blocked on our remote sites. We owe these site VPN to our headquarters to access. We need to split tunneling.

  These sites Web consists of many IPs from different subnets and distributed through the Internet. When you split tunneling based IPs, it is impossible for me to add IP one by one.

  So, what is the best way to handle this?

  Han

  Yes, it will be difficult to say, since the decision is made by the FB server.

  HTH.

  Portu.

• Cisco SRP 521W with multiple WAN IP addresses

  Hi all

  I have an unusual scenario that may require the use of a SRP 521W-, the scenario is as follows:

  Temporary installation:

  • Cisco 857 ADSL router until the Ethernet Hand-off is installed
  • Several IPS delivered on the ADSL WAN service
  • Cisco 857 in Bridge Mode and connected to the WAN - SRP 521W port
  • Cisco 521W manages authentication and routing
  • Check Point Firewall system connected to SRP 521W LAN-1
  • Check Point Firewall has IP WAN 203.XXX.XXX.XXX
  • Cisco UC-540W connected to SRP 521W LAN-2
  • Cisco UC-540W has 203.XX WAN IP. XX. XX

  If you understand the situation described above, I'm curious to know if this is possible and if so how? I need a totally separate networks and the only thing they have in common is the Cisco SRP 521W.

  It is also worth noting that the SRP 521W is used because the ADSL service is only temporary, while the fiber build is complete and the carrier provides an Ethernet Hand-Off, then Internet service will change to this type of presentation and the ADSL router will be relegated in the dark loneliness world.

  I went through the router and have been playing around with the settings, the problem is that I have nothing in LABORATORY work more that can I would like to reproduce this environment and test it before deployment... SO I hope someone can help to shed light on this case in order to reduce the amount of trail and error, I have to meet to operate.

  For any help or suggestion is appreciated.

  See you soon,.

  David.

  Hi David,

  Is your PC provides you with all the public addresses within the same subnet?  that is the WAN IP of the router is part of the same subnet as the address 203.x.x.x?  Or well, is separately assigned WAN address?

  If the addresses are all part of the same subnet, I fear the SRP520 will not support what you are trying to do - this product does not support the concept of a single address on the WAN port forwarding/DMZ use.

  If the sunet inside is routed via the WAN address, then it should be possible to turn NAT and attack the VLAN local accordingly.

  PS: The SRP541 host multiple WAN addresses for port forwarding/DMZ.

  Kind regards

  Andy

• 506th Cisco multiple external IP addresses?

  Hello

  Is it possible to define several public addresses on the external interface of a Cisco Pix 506th? The old firewall would take requests in ony four IP addresses, and then we had a NAT that would direct traffic. It's a bit like DMZ a poor man. Now the old firewall has been replaced and I can't find any option that would allow me to set multiple IP addresses to the external interface. What I'm missing here?

  Any help would be greatly appreciated

  You use PAT = Port Address Translation to do this, here is an example:

  acl_outside list access permit tcp any host 1.1.1.2 eq http

  acl_outside list access permit tcp any host 1.1.1.2 eq 21

  Access-group acl_outside in interface outside

  static (inside, outside) tcp 1.1.1.2 192.168.1.10 http http netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (inside, outside) tcp 1.1.1.2 192.168.1.20 ftp ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  # Make sure the clear xlate resets all sessions.

  clear xlate

  sincerely

  Patrick Iseli