Need higher resolution of the image in the workspace

Similar Questions

• I downloaded the version low resolution and now I need high-resolution for purchases

  I downloaded the version low resolution and now I need high-resolution for purchases. I can serch by name? Customer's fault the image... AdobeStock_78710038_WM.jpeg

  Do the following once you have acquired a license of the image.

  I downloaded my 10 free images and they all have the Adobe watermark on them, so I can't use them. Why have a watermark on them?

• Satellite Pro A60 image need high resolution

  Hello

  One of you have an image of high resolution of the TOSHIBA Satellite Pro A60

  It's the one I want to:

  

  but in high resolution.

  TOSHIBA had it once but no more.

  Thank you!
  suddste

  Hello

  Visit the Google Web site and choose the image looking for option.
  There is a special option of Google only for the photo.
  I sure you will find some nice pictures of m.

• How to manage the high resolution of the images for 9860/9850 devices?

  The recently published 9860/9850 device having a display of 800 x 480.

  This means that we need to recompile applications with high resolution images for this device? Is it possible to have the BONES emulate 320 x 480 for the App (it's what iOS does for their retina display).

  Otherwise, I see this break many apps.

  Thank you

  -MO

  VK = virtual keyboard

  It's an investment of time very wise to make the resolution app agnostic, so that the layout is relative to the available real estate.

  In this way only a few minor assets will have to be updated and the application will still work out of the box.   According to the design of the application (i.e. using bitmaps full vs tile stuff) it might even not need to be adjusted at all.

  5.0 + provides a high quality, scaling, it is a valid option (I use it to support 5.0 320 x 240 devices, using the same assets than 7.0).

• Complex script to automate the Conversion of Images high resolution for the Web

  I use Actions in Photoshop (currently using CS4) all the time, but have never tapped into the scripting features, so please forgive me if these questions are obvious.
  
  The basic description of my project is simply creating web images in jpg format, among our library of high-resolution print images.
  
  We have a folder with a copy of all the images we need to convert. File types from TIF, PSD, EPS, and JPG.
  
  The challenges (for me) are:
  
  1. these images vary in orientation to be big or wide; I need the higher between dimensions, whether the height or the width, 400 pixels; and then I need to canvas has added to the other dimension to make the picture a perfect square of 400 x 400. I don't know how, or if I can, do PS choose the bigger dimensions, to 400 px.
  
  2. some of these images have clipping paths; I need to use these roads to clear the background in the pictures; the names of these masks are not the same in each image.
  
  Thus, the basic flow of the script would open the file; Set the maximum size to 400 px; Add a blank canvas to fill the other dimension and that also make 400px; use an image clipping path if it has one to erase the background of the image. Save for web in jpg format, adding "-400" at the end of the name of the file (but before the '.jpg'); size 115 value and save for web, by adding '-115' to the name. value size 80 and save for web, by adding '-80' to the name.

  A new version has been downloaded more than PS - Scripts Sean this now creates a record of each file selected with the name of "JPEG" and there the possibility to include subfolders.

• Higher resolution of the photos?

  Years I'm locked in a montage sequence Adobe to create (*.) PSD album pages) (8.5x11x300pix ~ 47 MB), then save them in (*.) (JPG) (8.5x11x300pix ~2.5MB). But the email them, it's to make them easily readable on any monitor, I have them shrink down to an acceptable (*.) (JPG) (3.86x5x300pix ~ 600 KB) size. I have more than 4000 album pages, each recorded in 3 sizes above! (I think that it is not possible), but my question is, how can I get a (net) e of the higher resolutionunacceptable image that can be presented in the same way that I use at the moment, it's still easily readable on any monitor do?

  I think you should probably have been on the forum of Photoshop, but I'll answer anyway.

  First let's get the terms straight. San you create images, the PSD and Some JPEG size 8.5 X 11 X 300pix... I think you mean 8.5 X 11 at 300 PPI. This means that the images are 2550 X 3300 pixel. There is no difference in the resolution or sharper of the PSD vs the JPG provide you don't compress the JPEG format to the death. The only difference is the size of the file and the quality of the information in pixels of each individual pixel. The quality setting of 100% for a JPEG, it would be very difficult to distinguish between the pixels of an image JPEG and PSD A. In order to test this open from your PSD files and then place a JPEG of the same image on the top layer of the PSC and set the blending mode to difference. All that's not completely black pixel is a pixel where information in JPEG format is different from that in the PSD.

  Now scared to talk to the images you want to e-mail. You say that they are registered to 3.86 X 5 X 300 pix. Once again, I think you mean 3.86 X 5 at 300 ppi. This means that the smaller JPEG images are 1158 X 1500 pixels. According to today's standards, these are terribly small images. There is also another point. The PPP settings for the images that you want to send any at all. The TPP for the images that you want to put on a web page is not serious at all. The PPI also makes no difference if the image is intended to be used in a video or flash or displayed on a computer screen. Only the images intended for a printer to print on paper or some other media care about the PPP settings. Everything must be sized by the dimensions in pixels.

  To prove my point download these two images and open them in Photoshop and check the setting of the PPI. The place in something on a printer as a doc word or Illustrator set up for a print document and to check the size.

  

  

  My iPhone push 2448 X 3264 pixel, and I send all the time. You can see almost every pixel on a standard HD screen. Sending your 1100 images of wide pixels to a HD monitor would fill only about half of the screen.

  

  So, here's the long and short of it. Most cameras now days hoot over 2500 images big pixel. Even my Sony point and shoot them takes pictures that are 4000 X 6000 pixels. If you resize your original images and reduce the number of pixels you reduce the resolution of the image regardless of the DPI setting. You limit your ability to manipulate the images again later. I didn't do it. Save for printing on 8.5 X 11 at 300 PPI is probably good enough, but with some high quality todays printers you can increase by 400 or maybe even more. In regard to the fixing of the jpegs to the e-mail or by sending them to a computer screen or monitor you want the images at least a scale display is in pixels. Many email clients will automatically reduce an image as an attachment to 600 or 1000 pixels wide, but in a modern 4K or even 5K monitor these images would be very small. I would design my workflow with final destination in mind and you ensure that I don't reduce the size of the camera originals. At least that's my 2 ¢.

• Higher resolution than the standard resolution is bad for your mac?

  Hi guys,.

  So my mac works normally on 1440 x 900, but with an application, I can go to full screen resolution supports and which is 2880 x 1800.

  So I was wondering, is - this bad for my mac? Is it bad for the map display, battery, processor, video or something else?

  Or is it perfectly save?

  Thanks in advance.

  If your Mac CAN operate at a higher resolution, everything that said is the lowest resolution you were using before was not the maximum resolution for your Mac.

  On CRT screens, you could push a little and squeeze more pixels horizontally on the screen than recommended.

  LCD flat screens have a pixel on the screen corresponds to a pixel in memory, the maximum resolution, and no compression is possible. Try to post more than that and he either cut them off or the screen goes wonky.

• problem of monitor high resolution: why the interface is so small?

  I installed Adobe master suite cs6 in my new Dell XPS 13 Pentecost a 3200 x 1600 px screen resolution. The interface of all programs (photoshop, illustrator etc...) except acrobat pro, seems so small you cant'work. For example, the height of the voice of the menu police is less half millimeter. I installed the latest update of Adobe and put in Photoshop interface parameters 'large font', but nothing changes.

  Can someone help me?

  The programs included with a membership of cloud are updated for the new operating systems and hardware

  See for yourself if the LATEST version of Cloud works with a 30 day trial

  Cloud Plans https://creative.adobe.com/plans

• To the bottom of the sample unnecessarily high resolution in the book?

  Hello

  I said in the forum Photoshop my workflow is strange and I don't have no need to do any resizing photoshop because there is the option at the bottom of the sample images of a unnecessarily high effective resolution is it in InDesign.

  So if I have a lot about 17.4 inches wide color jpeg photo and I want to put in JPEG 5.4 "black and white in a book of say 15 chapters and then export the book in pdf format, how can I avoid using photoshop? And where is the control at the bottom of the sample at 300 dpi or less?

  Thank you

  Garrett

  (I'm down here too... sniff.)

• My display has high resolution, if the toolbar and the menu looks very small, how to adjust the size without changing the resolution?

  ATT

  See the link below:

  Experimental features

  The scale of the user interface of 200 percent for screens high densities

• Unable to get the high resolution on the external display.

  Just upgraded my Mac OS of Sierra and now my LG Ultrawide is 1920 x 1080 and in the display preferences, I can't find an option to get the 2560 x 1080 recommended.

  If you open the display preferences, then press on and hold the Option key, and then click scaling options are available?

• HP 6500 scan high resolution works well with the solution Center HP; but is solid black w/imgage software for editing

  I got an OfficeJet 6500.

  If I try to scan a picture at a very high resolution, using an image of image editing software will come out black.

  I can scan the image using the HP solutions, at the same high resolution Center, and the image will scan very well.

  I think there is a setting for the Windows operating system that needs to be adjusted. I know because I had this same problem once before.

  I found the solution to my problem. but my computer crashed and I had to reinstall the full Windows operating system. I lost the changes I had made. It was in January 2011.

  I don't remember when I had the answer to my problem but I thought that I asked the question in the HP forum (it would have been some time in late 2010) and then someone answered with the solution to my problem. But I can't find the post I did then.

  -My operating system is Windows 7, with a 64-bit operating system.

  -The processor is an Intel Celeron 2 .50GHz.

  I would appreciate any help someone can offer.

  Hello JimTrail

  After watching this on the web, it seems that you is maybe to something. From what I found, GIMP uses a lot of resources, especially true for larger images. He isn't able to handle the scanning of an image as large as 4800dpi without additional RAM or virtual memory to compensate for the RAM.

  My suggestion would be to increase the size to the recommended or higher. Out of curiosity how much physical RAM have you? Microsoft recommends that virtual memory for no more than 3 times the amount of RAM installed. See article: change the size of virtual memory.

  You can also see the article below on the Tile Cache GIMP.org.

  How to set your Tile Cache

• The proxy editing low resolution, then apply changes to high resolution

  Hello

  I'm developing a continuous image of a great wall that will be seen about 1-2 feet of viewing distance. There are about 100 dpi.

  My image is currently 21 600 x 8100 pixels in 8-bit CMYK. It can grow. I don't do a lot of manipulation, but a lot of it is with the help of brushes and the smudge tool.

  2 questions:

  (1) I have a Mac Pro 12-core with 24 GB of RAM. The smudge tool is slooowly when working on this image (like a finger to the max brush size takes 15-20 seconds to enter into force).

  (2) is it a "string mesh" tool that I can use instead of the finger tool?

  Is it possible for me to edit a version low resolution of this image, then apply the changes that I made to the version high resolution? then I can use the tools anti-dirt and brush, and the finesse my work without the machine bogged down and Imaging will look correct. I'm looking for a way to use these tools in real time while working with this large image.

  This seems to be the solution (at least it is for me). I can apply my changes to the proxy low resolution by registering the mesh and then apply this same mesh to image high resolution. The brush sizes large (compared to the resolution of the image) that I am available in version low resolution are presented through the high resolution because the changes are not applied as strokes of brush, but as changes in the global network. changes made to the mesh are what is transferred when you export and import.

  Applying the mesh is pretty slow and it requires a bit of tinkering at the level high resolution, but makes me 95% of the way. I think that is achievable.

  To sum up - here are the steps:

  (1) I make a version low resolution of the image (like 1200px wide)

  (2) I make my changes to the image using fluidity

  (3) before committing the changes in fluidity, I have 'Save Mesh' in the Liquify tool

  (4) I opened my image in high resolution

  (5) I use liquify, but I do not use brushes, but rather load my saved the low-resolution mesh

  (6) profit.

  Thanks for the help of the people!

  --------------S

• Can I use still images high resolution in Keynote?

  Prepare a presentation in Keynote that requires a lot of photos/movies - it is to be broadcast from an international conference in the world.  So I don't want to spoil.

  I have some high resolution photos (the originals were RAW, I converted them to PNG).  I want to build my speech with the high-resolution PNG, or what I want to batch convert to JPEG before their insertion in the speech?  What would be an optimal size by peak.  There are probably about 100 stills or so, more than a dozen of short films (that's an hour and a half presentation I think).

  Or, if I don't use a high-resolution PNG (15-20 megs), is there a function in Keynote, which reduces the size of the files?

  And, if so, I'm better batch convert PNG to JPEG, or simply use the PNG and let Keynote optimization?

  For movies I'll all convert H264 (same resolution - 1920 x 1080 - Keynote presentation using the same optimal data rate that you would use for Vimeo).

  All ears,

  Ben

  Size of the images to match the slide size in Keynote;   in this case, they should be 1920 x 1080 pixels

  because they are PNG files keep than

  Convert a batch of images as follows:

  Open all of the batch of images in preview

  Select all the thumbnails in the sidebar - click on an image in the sidebar then (Command-A)

  on the Tools menu, choose Adjust size

  use the custom size and enter 1929 x 1080

  Save

  Place the images in Keynote, as follows: drag all the images in the browser (the sidebar on the left) and a new slide will be created for each image, centered and scaled to full screen

  If images are larger than the size of slide, they look better, they simply more space

  If the images are smaller than the size of slide, they will reduce in quality

• Good resolution of the device

  Hi all

  I'm trying to understand if I set the resolution of my appropriate cell. If anyone has a spare time could you please give me some comments.

  That's what I know: rated power LC is +/-0.5348 mV/V and requires 10 v excitation.  Applied load of +/-115N offers (Max) + / 5 out of LC .348mV.

  So 1µV = 0.021N.

  What I'm confused about is this. After that I connect LC SG24 unit with excitation 10V and gain 100, should I even when the relationship between µV and Newtons as before or should I recalculate it according to this 100 gain, such as:

  Applied load of +/-115N (Max) provide 1µV and +/-534 .8mV LC output = 0.000021N?

  Sg24 signal will pxi-6221, which has 4 lines/res., so my understanding is once the relationship µV and Newtons is correctly calculated to get the resolution of LC in some range of PXI unit, say (+/-200 mV-> 6.4µV resolution), I just need to multiply my value of 6.4 1µV.

  Thanks in advance

  There is a gain of 100 on the SCC-SG24 but it will be transparent to the voltage, you will see when to acquire in your program.  The reason for the amplification is to use the full range of the ADC on the PXI-6221.  Thus, your input signal, seen by the NI PXI-6221 will (max) 5.348mV * 100 = 534.8mV.  If you set the range to the PXI-6221 of +/-1V, then you will be able to have a very high resolution on the signal amplified (2V/2 ^ 16 = 30.5 uV).  However, the output signal, you will see will be is scalable down into the 5.348mV software was seen initially by the SG24.  No conversion is necessary.