NEMA OUTDOOR FOR CISCO AP 3702

Similar Questions

• It is recommended to have a vulnerability for Cisco ASA device scan.

  Dear everybody.

  I have a doubt about the analysis of vulnerabilities for Cisco ASA device. Currently we have a vulnerability to network devices include firewalls. But after race for cisco ASA vulnerability scanning, found nothing in the analysis report.

  Is it is recommended to have a Cisco ASA vulnerability scanning and it will defeat the purpose of the firewall?

  I do not understand you ask you can set the ASA to allow an external user, run an analysis on the internal network?

  If so the answer is generally no. The ASA, by default, not allow incoming connections (or attempts of connections) that are not explicitly allowed in a list of inbound access (applied to the external interface). In most cases there should also be (NAT) network address translation rules configured.

  If you had a remote access VPN, you can allow external scanner to connect through that, then they would have the necessary access to analyze internal systems (assuming that allowed VPN access to all internal networks)

• Is there an SSH for Cisco LMS interface?

  Hello

  Is there an SSH for Cisco LMS interface? Now when I try SSHing in I'm just met a guest for ciscoworks scp. I am trying to access so that I can add new devices by using the dcrcli command without having to RDP in the machine that is running on LMS.

  In addition, is accessible for LMS api soap from the outside? I tried to make it work using soapui but ended up which put on hold after that I read somewhere else that the API is not available outside, I thought I'd check here if to see if it's actually true.

  Thank you

  When LMS runs on one machine virtual ('soft machine'), ADE-OS based on Linux is exposed through ssh.

  When LMS is running on a windows server, there is no interface to ssh for the application of the LMS.

  In this case, the command line utilities are more or less accessible via a Windows command prompt that would require the native console or server access to the RDP.

  The different functions available cli are detailed here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management _...

  I've never seen someone try to use LMS via the API if you are in a very small set of users there. LMS being in its sunset, I wouldn't hold much hope for us to open.

• Cannot configure the static IP address for Cisco Touch 8 "

  Hi all

  I found that I can not configure the static IP address for Cisco Touch on TC7.0.1 / 7.0.2 with the procedure described below.

  1. upgrade a codec (e.g. SX20 TC6.3 or less) and a touch paired with the codec for TC7.0.2.

  2. after the upgrade, désapparier (with the help of désapparier Touch button) touch and it reboot.

  3. tap on "IP settings."

  4. Select "Manual IP allocation".

  5. Enter the IP address, subnet mask, default gateway, and then press "Save".

  Even though we have configured the static IP address with the above procedure, IP allocation remains 'Auto' (= DHCP) and the IP address, subnet mask, default gateway is also empty.

  In this situation, the only way to configure the IP address for the Touch is to use the DHCP server.

  I guess many users uses the static IP assignment like us, so please fix it as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Best regards

  Kotaro Hashimoto

  Hi Kotaro,

  It is a known problem in TC7.0.1 and TC7.0.2. The id of the bug is CSCum82147.

  To work around the problem, set IP address you want the button before moving on to TC7.0.x.

  The bug has been fixed and will be included in the next version of the TC software.

  Kind regards

  Jonas Tysso

• Windows 2003 & Management Center for Cisco Security Agents

  I'm sorry if this question has been asked before, but I was unable to see the answer here.

  The management center of CiscoWorks for Cisco Security Agents can be installed on a Windows 2003 Server?

  I'm asking because I am that it is difficult to find a new server that comes with Windows 2000.

  I'm not in the office at the moment, but I think the version I have is 4.5.

  Thank you

  Ian

  You're welcome and good luck.

• Pilot Windows 10 for Cisco M10 hotspot

  I'm not savvy computer even if this cannot be stated very well.  I upgraded Windows 10 when Microsoft has suggested what to do. However, there are two problems when I tried to use Windows 10: I couldn't access the Internet and my Cisco wireless access point would not work.  I received two error messages: 1) problem with the driver for the card box (Internet) connection. (2) problem with the driver for the wireless network connection card.

  I guess that the problem of wireless driver requires something to be fixed by Cisco?  If this is correct when Cisco will provide an updated for Windows 10 driver?  Or am I misinterpreted the error message as to who should solve the problem?

  I went back to Windows 7 since without internet and 10 wireless was useless for me.

  Help or suggestions would be appreciated.

  P.S. I think that my firmware/software is up-to-date.

  Don't worry, leod. Incidentally, what is the Roku to your TV? It still works with your router? If so, this means that your router is good.

• PowerConnect 6248 switch for Cisco router

  Hello

  I'm new to this forum and I have a problem at the moment between a Cisco router and a dell pc6248. The problem is that I lost conectivity in VLAN 1 when I connect the router to a trunk port in the switch, however I conectivity VLAN 2 through this link to trunk. The configuration of the switch:

  interface ethernet 1/g48

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1-2

  output

  interface ethernet 1/g43

  switchport mode access

  switchport access vlan 2

  output

  On router

  fast interface 0/1

  no ip address

  no downtime

  fast interface 0/1.1

  encapsulation dot1q 1 native

  IP 192.200.3.1 255.255.255.0

  fast interface 0/1.2

  encapsulation dot1q 2

  IP 192.168.51.33 255.255.255.248

  output

  With the above configuration, I lost conectivity with the host in the vlan 1 - 192.200.3.x/24, but I win conectivity VLAN 2, when I connect the router to the 48 trunk port in the switch. This means that the trunk link for VLAN 2 work but not for VLAN 1.

  I read on the port of general mode, where I can configure the pvid of the port as 1 (vlan1) and it would be the unttag VLAN (even natively in Cisco), and I can configure the VLAN 2 like the tag, all this in the same port. What do you think about this? Someone have set up something like that?

  Best regards

  Erasmo

  PD: I write from Chile, I apologize for my English.

  I agree with you, I would try the general mode on the PowerConnect switch.

  mode console # switchport general

  Console # switchport General allowed vlan add 2 tag

  Console # switchport pvid General 1

  Keep us updated.

• PoE for Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L

  Hello

  Will deploy this device for a small office. Just a quick question, a Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-l switch provides PoE on all its 8 ports or simply powered through his PoE uplink port.

  Read the URL below, but did not have much info. TIA!

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/produc...

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  Sorry John, my comment is not directed at you.  The link you posted, the content is very, the lack of a better term, misleading.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps12200/prod_models_comparison.html

  Go to this site instead.  It shows that the model you have chosen has NO PoE.  Instead, it uses the PoE of a switch upstream to turn.

• Changes in prices for the contracts of Support for Cisco IDS/IPS

  Nice day

  My boss asked me if there is no value added regarding Cisco's recent move to charge separately for hardware and software support for IDS/IPS product line.

  Other than what is obvious (need software support for updates of signature, need of material support in case something breaks), I'm having a hard time to provide a response.

  Can anyone suggest what is the increased value, other than annual recurrent costs more we get as a result of this change of license?

  Also, was there any release press or other notice to the client about this change?

  I am at a loss...

  Alex Arndt

  Alex,

  Cut through the spin and the hype... the software support allows us to finance a development team dedicated to signature, which has improved our signature rejection rates and response times. In addition, it is allowing us to expand our coverage to keep IDS 4.1 to get the support of the signature. It is contrary to our previous policy which would have seen 4.1 updates to signature cut shortly after 5.0 released.

  A side effect of this is that our development team is now free to focus on the development of the feature, and you will see more updates, more often.

  Can't comment on press releases and others, they make your head spin my ;)

  Scott

• See the version for Cisco Blocker

  Hello

  As I am not really tech savvy here, we currently have a problem where we need to check a serial number for blocker of Cisco. However, the customer says that they didn't show version and we provided instead the system state information. However, her, we can derive the correct serial No. Anyone who is familiar with how to interpret the State of the system to get the correct serial number for Cisbo Blocker? Or are there other options that the customer can give us to get the correct serial number?

  I enclose the status of the system provided by the customer.

  Thank you

  Cathy

  Spare part

  BV277F1 is a valid serial number for blocker of Cisco.

• a question about upgrading memory CF for Cisco 3745

  As we know, the cisco 3745 has 2 locations CF. memory One is internal with a 32 MB of memory by default CF card, another one is external.

  My question is:

  1 is the same as the internal memory card CF CF external memory card?

  2. If I choose the upgrade of the plant CF memory from 32 MB to 128 MB, which slot will be used? Cisco remove the memory of 32MB CF card and install a new 128 MB card in the internal slot or simply add an additional CF memory card through the outside slot?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  the reference for the internal and external numbers are different, which suggests that they are not compatible. So you will have to specify what you want to, for example, MEM3725-32U128CF (which is the internal upgrade) or MEM3725-128CF-EXT (which is the external upgrade).

  In all cases, internal and external cards are not cumulative, in order to get e.g. 128 MB flash, you must either internal, or external card with these 128 MB:

  Q. can partition you the internal Cisco 3700 Series Compact Flash card and the card Compact Flash external to combine or separate them?

  A. No, you cannot join two separate Compact Flash cards or you can their partition.

  HTH,

  GP

• Switchport security best practices for Cisco IP phones

  Hello.

  I have some difficulty to understand what the safest method is to ensure a Cisco IP Phone.

  Can't get info on how many course connect a switchport and a telephone computer IP Cisco with a daisy chained to him.

  The thing I fear more precisely is how to secure against attacks of Double VLAN tagging and COP on this port.

  I searched regardless of the possible resource for the answer and you have not found anything useful.

  I also have a question regarding port security on a switch: can you set a minimum amount of MAC addresses active and then limit the period of ageing on the MAC addresses on a specific switchport, such that if someone disconnects the phone and sets up a Cisco switch or other device of thugs, then the port should be stopped during the period of ageing.

  Let me know, what you would suggest to better secure the hose between the Cisco IP phone and the switch.

  Best regards

  Casper.

  If you see all these as the attack vector for your environment, there are only 802. 1 x that can help you.

• Questions of VLAN and configuration for Cisco AIR-CT2504-25-K9 Controller

  Hello

  It's my first time thanks to the Cisco wireless solutions, so I was hopping someone could help me with the following:

  We just bought the AIR-CT2504-25-K9 controller with some points of access for the AIR-CAP1702I-E-K9.

  The network is as follows:

  Peripheral layer 3 (managed by third parties): it's on the domain network. (VLAN by default, 1 - unidentified)

  ADSL router - it's the network without comment thread. (Default Vlan 4 - tagged).

  VOIP: VLAN 5.

  Both fittings go into a switch Cisco SG500 52 (Layer 2). There is a port to shared resources on the switch SG500 with VLAN 1 (Tagged) and VLAN 4 (with tag). The WLAN controller is plugged into this port trunking.

  The data and management network are in the same subnet and on the same VLAN (1).

  I used the wizard on the controller setup.

  There are three interfaces:

  management VLAN ID 1 IP 192.168.1.2 Port 1 (configured with a gateway domain network, DHCP, etc.).

  VLAN wireless identifier 4 IP 192.168.5.1 Port 1 comments (configured with modem router ADSL, DHCP, etc.).

  Virtual IP 192.0.2.1

  Proxy DHCP active overall.

  There are two wlan networks:

  (1) area - management Interface - SSID abc.

  (2) comments - comments Wireless Interface - SSID xyz (the wizard put to management, but I changed it to the wireless).

  Are the AP connected to another SG500 switch which is shared resources to the switch with the controller.

  Ports of the APs are connected to have only 1 VLAN unidentified. They don't have 4 VLAN Tag or not identified. However, everything seems to work as expected.

  When I join the guest network (SSID xyz), I get an IP address from the router ADSL and all Internet traffic goes through him. When I connect to the domain network (SSID abc), I get an IP address from the DHCP in Windows Server and all traffic goes through the device of layer 3 (I checked the public IP address in my browser). I can't ping anything from one network to the other.

  My questions are the following:

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Thank you

  A

  Hello

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  Yes, I'm with CAPWAP:

  More information: http://lets-start-to-learn.blogspot.de/2014/08/cisco-wireless-understand...

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  If you want that mgmt interface must be unmarked and then put 0 otherwise you can use vlan 1.

  I do not have what is configured under mgmt and comments interface, but according to the name I'll say yes, you must set the comments under comments wlan interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Yes, there are many things that you can configure, but I'll leave most of the default of things unless you really need to change!

  The following best practices: http://www.borderlessccie.net/?p=270

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Port forwarding for Cisco RV042G TSE

  Hi, I have just configured a Cisco small Business routers on my network RV042G. My problem is that I would like to allow TSE through the WAN1 and I am not able to do. I place this information in the menu:-Setup / Forwarding TSE[TCP/3389~3389]->192.168.1.15 - firewall / access rules: allow TSE [3389] WAN1 192.168.1.15 ~ 192.168.1.11 192.168.1.15 ~ 192.168.1.15 still configuring it please? Thanks for your help.

  Thanks for the reply.

  There is nothing else that can be done on the router RV042G. all the configuration is in place.

  The only other way to make this work is to see if you can do the port forwarding on your modem and then forward all ports to the WAN address of the RV042G, or if the modem allows to create a DMZ, then you can connect the router to the DMZ port, but that's all.

  Please let us know.

• Plug-and-Play for Cisco Small Business 300 Series managed switch

  Nice day

  What are the automatic installation options available for the Managed Switch series of Cisco Small Business 300?

  It seems there are not, the operating system is not the standard IOS I used to.

  I would use with ability to bridge the Infrastructure first Cisco PnP.

  Concerning

  Stone

  First Infrastructure use and assume an agent CNS (Cisco Network Services) on the other side, when you enable the 'plug & play '. Series 300/500 do not run IOS and does not include the CNS agent, but there is a way to activate the automatic configuration. Switches supported by the automatic DHCP configuration (using DHCP options 66, 67, etc.) in which case they automatically download their config to a TFTP server at boot time. This allows an administrator to put the configs for all switches on a TFTP server and simply start a default switch factory in order to obtain config.

  Seal a document shows how this is done.

  Hope that the information would be useful.