PoE for Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L

Similar Questions

• Compatibility matrix for Cisco Catalyst 3012 Switch Module

  Hello

  I'm checking the compatibility of the VMware vSphere 5.5U1 Guide and an IBM switch module Part Number: 43W4401 product name: Cisco Catalyst Switch Module 3012. The search of the matrix returns Cisco 1GigE I350 LOM who seems to identify the drivers of Cisco.

  Can anyone help clarify and check if this IBM re-branded chassis switch module is supported and to a specific firmware for the switch code? Thank you all.

  L2/L3 switches are off-limit of drivers for vSphere hypervisor, so you don't find on the HCL...

  Here's IBM BladeCenter matrix interop for VMware:

  IBM ServerProven compatibility

  and here is the interoperability of the switch Cisco Catalyst 3012 with IBM BladeCenter chassis:

  IBM BladeCenter Interoperability Test program

  I hope this helps...

• Cisco Catalyst 2960-S switch configured for 802. 1 x sends a query to access the Radius Server Radius

  Setup

  Cisco Catalyst 2960-S running 15.0.2 - SE8

  Under Centos freeRadius 6.4 RADIUS server

  Client (supplicant) running Windows 7

  When Windows client is connected to the port (port 12 in my setup) with authentication of 802. 1 x active switch, show of Wireshark that catalyst sends ask EAP and the client responds with EAP response. But it made not the request to the Radius server. The RADIUS test utility 'aaa RADIUS testuser password new-code test group' works.
  Here is my config running. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
  #show running mySwitch-
  mySwitch #show running-config
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 2094 bytes
  !
  version 12.2
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  no password encryption service
  !
  hostname myswitch
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  activate the password secret 5 $1$ Z1z6$ kqvVYRQdVRZ0h8aDTV5DR0 enable password!
  !
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA dot1x group group radius aaa accounting dot1x default start-stop radius authentication group!
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  1 supply ws-c2960s-24ts-l switch
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  control-dot1x system-auth
  pvst spanning-tree mode
  spanning tree extend id-system
  !
  !
  !
  !
  internal allocation policy of VLAN no ascendant interface FastEthernet0 no stop ip address!
  GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/3
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/6
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/7
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/8
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/9
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/10
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12
  switchport mode access
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  dot1x EAP authenticator
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/13
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/14
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/21
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/26
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/27
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/28
  !
  interface Vlan1
  IP 10.1.2.12 255.255.255.0
  !
  IP http server
  IP http secure server
  activate the IP sla response alerts
  recording of debug trap
  10.1.2.1 host connection tcp port 514 RADIUS-server host 10.1.2.1 transport auth-port 1812 acct-port 1646 timeout 3 retransmit testing123 key 3.
  Line con 0
  line vty 0 4
  password password
  line vty 5 15
  password password
  !
  end

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20

  Have you run wireshark on the server because the request to switch? If so you make sure that there is a response from the server? For Windows network POLICY Server (I've never tried Centos), you must ensure that the request is related to a policy which then authenticates, or denies access. Usually, it is a matter of such attributes and the seller.

  Regarding the configuration, it seems a bit out of the AAA. Try to remove the:

  line "aaa dot1x group service radius authentication" and this by using instead:

  "aaa dot1x default radius authentication group". After the dot1x word you are supposed to provide a list of the authentication or the default Word if you do not want to use a list.

• PC8132F to Cisco Catalyst 3600

  Nice day

  I hope someone can help me here, I'll have questions, get a channel on port with 802. 1 q, working between a stack of 2 devices of the switches 8132F and a single Cisco Catalyst 3600, this switch series switch cannot be removed due to regulations graduates by a Government Department that works to and I need to put an effective link between the switch and our new 8132F switches (this was easy until the network was fully Cisco) but for the life of me I can't not operate. When I connect the ports (well I connect only 1 because I'm testing only at this stage, in the end, it will be two)

  Here's the configs for two switches

  Cisco:

  Interface Port-Channel 4

  Description box EtherChannel to Dell Core

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

  switchport mode trunk

  broadcast storm control 60.00

  interface GigabitEthernet1/3

  Description box to Dell Core EtherChannel * PORT 01 *.

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

  switchport mode trunk

  broadcast storm control 60.00

  spanning tree portfast trunk

  spanning tree guard root

  channel-group mode 4 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/4

  Description box to Dell Core EtherChannel * 02 PORT *.

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

  switchport mode trunk

  broadcast storm control 60.00

  spanning tree portfast trunk

  spanning tree guard root

  channel-group mode 4 on

  !

  Dell:

  interface port-channel 24
  Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
  dvlan-tunnel mode
  port-channel min-links 1
  output
  !
  interface Te1/0/24
  Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
  active in mode channel-group 24
  Storm-control broadcasts 60
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
  dvlan-tunnel mode
  output
  !
  interface Te2/0/24
  Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
  active in mode channel-group 24
  Storm-control broadcasts 60
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
  dvlan-tunnel mode
  output

  Any help would be appreciated more

  Concerning

  Justin

  jpsimmonds, I sent an email and look forward to your response.

• 6248 FI Cisco's UCS with Cisco catalyst 2960 connectivity

  In our environment, UCS, connects the two fabric as a Cisco Nexus 9 k switch upstream with vPC and it works well. But we need to isolate some virtual servers on the blades of the UCS on an entirely separate DMZ switch which is Cisco catalyst 2960.

  (1) so can we connect cables separate physical twinax of FI uplink ports to catalyst 2960 and connectivity to the servers in the DMZ keeping YEW to nexus connectivity as it is?

  (2) in this case, as there are 2 switches to nexus core 1 and 2 so we will require 2 cisco catalyst 2960 for disjoint such a network? or otherwise we can connect A FI and FI B to one on his 2 numbers 2960 switch. Gig SFP ports + 10?

  (3) also suggest things must be taken in charge, the best guides practice or an illustration in this context.

  The assignment is static and cannot be changed.

  location 1 - uplink 1

  slot 2 - uplink 2...

  If a property has no blade, the corresponding uplink is not used and that can not be changed!

  This dedication of uplinks of IOM is of course a lot of resources: cables, ports on FI, allowed port,...

• Connection Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to Cisco Catalyst 6500?

  I watch a lot of design with the Cisco UCS solution guide and everywhere it is Cisco Nexus 5000/7000 connects to the uplink ports of Cisco UCS 6120 FI with the benefits of technology to the vPC.

  How about connect Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to 10GE ports in Cisco Catalyst 6500 (without VSS and VSS)? It is possible to design?

  If I use C6500VSS there will be port-channel of the aggregation of the UCS Nx10GE all the bandwidth?

  And what happens if I use C6500 (without VSS) - how it will be on the many links between UCS and two boxes C6500? It will be blocked by STP? A little on the other?

  Please explain to me, because we have only C6500 switches in our data center and want to test a Cisco UCS schassis.

  Yes, you can connect the 6120 s to cat6500s with or without vs. With VSS, you get a vPC as port channel where 2 links to a single 6120 can be connected to different 2 6500 s in a port LACP-channel.

  VSS is not necessary, you can connect a 10 G uplinks / 1 G of 1 or more of a 6120 at cat6500s. I you have 2 cat6500s (non - vss) and 2 uplinks by 6120, then you want to connect 1 cat6500-1 and the other to cat6500-2. I would recommend going ahead and creating a single port-channel port so that you can easily add the uplinks in the furture without interruption of service.

  Ideally, for non - vss, I would have 4 10 uplinks by 6120; 2 in a channel port cat6500-1 and 2 in a port in cat6500-2 channel

• Cisco Catalyst 4503-> Cisco 3560 L3-> Cisco 2960 L2-> Cisco SMB switch

  Hi Experts,

  I am trying to add a Cisco SMB SF300 - 24 Switch to an infrastructure that has only the Cisco Catalyst switches

  The base layer is Cisco Cataylst 4503. Distribution is Cisco Catalyst 3560 and Cisco 2960 switches access layer.

  There are about 30 VLAN present in the infrastructure that is announced to all switches using VTP. Inter VLAN routing takes place at basic switches

  by creating the Interface VLAN for each VLAN of L2.

  1. the new 150 VLAN must be created on the new Cisco SMB switch. If I create a corresponding interface 150 VLAN on core switches, it will forward the other VLANs traffic just as he is currently working for Cisco 2960 Catayst switches?

  2. While they inspected, I could see that the DERIVATIVE is not supported on the Cisco SMB switches and I would need to go GVRP if I need to make advertising information to other switches VLAN. But since GVRP is only supported on CatOS and there is no inter operability between GVRP and DERIVED, I would need to manually create the VLAN on the new switch. Is this correct?

  Help, please!

  Thank you very much

  ANUP

  Good afternoon Anup Sasikumar

  Please use our forum

  My name is Johnnatan I am part of the community of support to small businesses, I saw your post and I understand that you want to configure VTP and GVRP.

  I'm afraid you will have to configure it manually each Vlan in each device CatOS GVRP, in order to keep their databases vlan in sync. As you say, VTP is support it not in CatOS

  You can try to connect the two protocols, but I encourage you do not follow this procedure.

  On your question about intervlan routing, if you create a corresponding interface 150 VLANS on switches to base it is routed, if your configuration is correct (port access, ports of junction, intervlan etc..)

  I hope that you will find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory to you, please indicate the question as answer.

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer

• Replacement Module supervisor in Cisco Catalyst 6500 VSS 1440

  Hello forum Cisco team!

  I am trying to replace a defective supervisor (Sup720 VS 10 G) on a pair of Catalyst 6509 VSS. I received the RMA and the document Replace Module, supervisor of the Cisco Catalyst 6500 Virtual Switching System 1440 (the document is attached) with the procedure. After going through the steps, I have a few questions during the installation of the new supervisor:

  1. do all links (including the VSL) must be connected before feeding the new supervisor? It comes from before that image and the boot config is copied to the new supervisor.

  2. once the startup config and the image is copied from the active VSS switch in the new supervisor, the document said to check orders for priority switch in the copied startup config form the active VSS, but the priority of each switch is not stored in the startup configuration as far as I know. Can you please clarify this?

  My goal is to add the new supervisor engine without disrupting the current active VSS switch.

  Thank you in advanced for your support!

  Hey,.

  With regard to your questions:

  1. do all links (including the VSL) must be connected before feeding the new supervisor? It comes from before that image and the boot config is copied to the new supervisor. - Yes

  2. once the startup config and the image is copied from the active VSS switch in the new supervisor, the document said to check orders for priority switch in the copied startup config form the active VSS, but the priority of each switch is not stored in the startup configuration as far as I know. Can you please clarify this? - Once you convert the switch for VSS priorities will be stored in the startup configuration file. Please visit the following link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst6500/IOS/12-2Sx/configuration/guide/book/VSS.html#wp1111770

  However, it is no longer recommended and therefore should be avoided. I suggest you not setting is not the priority.

  HTH.

  Kind regards

  RS.

• Cisco Catalyst 3750 G cable StackWise Query

  Hi everyone, I hope you can shed some light on my question.

  I have a job reserved Friday to add a switch to an existing fireplace. I was wondering at what point I need to use a longer cable to complete the ring.

  The existing stack consists of 2 x Cisco Catalyst 3750 G-24TS-24 switches are the 1.5U models and I will be adding a 3750 G-12-12 to the stack. So a total of 4U.

  So I guess my question is, do you think that the CAB-STACK - 50CM = cable supplied with the unit will be long enough, or do you think I will need to order a CAB-STACK - 1 M =? It's been a while since I've done it and I think remember me being quite stiff and bulky cables. All switches are in order without a space.

  Kind regards

  Mike

  Disclaimer

  The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose. Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.

  RESPONSIBILITY

  Any author will be responsible for any damage that it (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

  Poster

  If you do the 'classic' connections, i.e. 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3, 4, and 4 to 1, and the 50CM won't reach between 1 and 4, you should be able to use shorter cables as: 1-2 and 1-3 and 4-2 and 4-3.

  PS:

  BTW, remember that 12-12 can use SDM models incompatible with the 3750 G.  I.e., ensure the 12-12 has a model SDM compatible before connect you to the battery.

• Tecra A7: Not possible to update driver display for Mobile catalyst 6.9

  I tried to update my display drivers for Mobile catalyst 6.9, but during the installation, I get this error annoing: "failure of the installation run installation: an error occurred during a seek operation.

  I tried to uninstall the old drivers and then installing the new, but I get the same error and I don't know the cause. A few days ago that everything works perfectly, so I guess it's a software I as causesc this problem.

  Help, please!

  Hello Vlad

  It is well known that on most new units is not possible to install the graphics drivers designed by graphics card manufacturers. He is always shown in Setup error as in your case. It's the material.

  Graphic driver Toshiba designed is a kind of sanitized version. Sorry, but I'm afraid there is nothing to do. You claim your previous assignment of fan performance. If this driver can be installed, I fear that this graphics card may be forced to run faster and produce more heat.

• Cisco Catalyst 6509 and 6513 goes into config race disk0: / Backup Script

  We use a Cisco Catalyst 6509 and 6513 switches in our network LAN and Man.

  Please help me and share the script to take backup of all respective running to their disk0 configuration switches: / per week.

  Double post.

• Cisco Catalyst 6509 and 6513 running config backup to their respective disk0: / Script

  We use a Cisco Catalyst 6509 and 6513 switches in our network LAN and Man.

  Please help me and share the script to take backup of all respective running to their disk0 configuration switches: / per week.

  Kind regards

  Vinay

  Double post.

• NEMA OUTDOOR FOR CISCO AP 3702

  Hello!

  One of my clients want to settle and NEMA (enclosure) for cisco AP 3702 OUTDOOR, but I can´t find the part number to order it!

  Can someone tell me if there is a reference number? I found http://www.terra-wave.com/cisco-3702e/http :// www.terra-wave.com/cisco-37...

  but obviously not cisco.

  So I guess the question is: cisco cell of this Articles? If yes where can I find part numbers?

  Thanks in advance

  You're right, Cisco does not. In this document, they recommend one of the following providers:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/wireless/technology/apdeploy/8-0/Cisco_Aironet_3700AP.html

  Third-party sources for the envelopes of NEMA type include:

  www.oberonwireless.com

  www.sparcotech.com

  www.Terra-Wave.com

• It is recommended to have a vulnerability for Cisco ASA device scan.

  Dear everybody.

  I have a doubt about the analysis of vulnerabilities for Cisco ASA device. Currently we have a vulnerability to network devices include firewalls. But after race for cisco ASA vulnerability scanning, found nothing in the analysis report.

  Is it is recommended to have a Cisco ASA vulnerability scanning and it will defeat the purpose of the firewall?

  I do not understand you ask you can set the ASA to allow an external user, run an analysis on the internal network?

  If so the answer is generally no. The ASA, by default, not allow incoming connections (or attempts of connections) that are not explicitly allowed in a list of inbound access (applied to the external interface). In most cases there should also be (NAT) network address translation rules configured.

  If you had a remote access VPN, you can allow external scanner to connect through that, then they would have the necessary access to analyze internal systems (assuming that allowed VPN access to all internal networks)

• Is there an SSH for Cisco LMS interface?

  Hello

  Is there an SSH for Cisco LMS interface? Now when I try SSHing in I'm just met a guest for ciscoworks scp. I am trying to access so that I can add new devices by using the dcrcli command without having to RDP in the machine that is running on LMS.

  In addition, is accessible for LMS api soap from the outside? I tried to make it work using soapui but ended up which put on hold after that I read somewhere else that the API is not available outside, I thought I'd check here if to see if it's actually true.

  Thank you

  When LMS runs on one machine virtual ('soft machine'), ADE-OS based on Linux is exposed through ssh.

  When LMS is running on a windows server, there is no interface to ssh for the application of the LMS.

  In this case, the command line utilities are more or less accessible via a Windows command prompt that would require the native console or server access to the RDP.

  The different functions available cli are detailed here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management _...

  I've never seen someone try to use LMS via the API if you are in a very small set of users there. LMS being in its sunset, I wouldn't hold much hope for us to open.