OR PCIe-7851R compatibility?

Hello

I'm going to get a PC the appropriate for the Board of the NI PCIe-7851R. But I do not know what bus card PCIe use this forum, x 1, or x 4 or x 16? I'm sure it can work with x 16 'remote connection', but what about x 1?

In addition, another thing is the memory required for the FPGA PC target. On the site it is said

Resource memory requirements vary according to the target FPGA; While 2 GB of memory is sufficient for typical screw FPGAS, the unique characteristics of each FPGA design can affect the amount of memory required:

  • FPGA Virtex-5 and earlier versions
      • Recommended: 3 to 4 GB of memory (32-bit OS)

This mean for the FPGA target computer, we need to better use at least 3 GB of RAM? What is the minimum requirement for this?

Also, if my main computer is 64-bit system, it will be compatatible with target FPGA 32-bit PC?

Thank you

Jean-François

Hello wjchen,

It uses the chassis 1 x.

System memory requirements depend on what your program does overall, what operating system you use, and what other programs you run in the background. 3GB tends to be limited to any Windows 7 machine, but it should work fine if you're just under LabVIEW and you do not need to store a large amount of information in RAM. I would recommend even when at least 4 GB of RAM, especially considering how cheap it is.

How your 64-bit machine communicates with the 32-bit computer that is hosting the target FPGA? You can communicate between two computers via TCP/IP, network-has published the shared variables and other methods. This communication is independent of the operating system.

You can also use the PCIe-7851R directly on a 64-bit system - just be sure to install 32-bit LabVIEW.

Note that the 7851R does not include a processor or a real time operating system - it is an FPGA with DIO and AIO that communication with your computer.

Tags: NI Hardware

Similar Questions

  • Compatibility of Linux NOR PCI 7851R

    Hi y ' All!

    I take into consideration this based FPGA Board to make digital acquisition/generation, plug it into a location PCIe to a PC running LabVIEW for Linux in a Red Hat environment.

    The data sheet of the "NI R series Multifunction RIO", it's the series in which this Council falls, does not list Linux in the paragraph "needs and compatibility." only several Windows OS.

    However, the description of the "NOR-RIO drier 14.0 for Linux" (which is the one used for this Board) mentions clearly PCI-7851R in the list of supported devices.

    Find these two statements a bit confused, I ask you if this material is actually compatible Linux.

    See you soon!

    Hi, as explained in RIO for Linux (http://www.ni.com/download/ni-rio-14.0/5027/en/) driver:

    14.0 driver NOR-RIO for Linux provides Runtime support for devices OR RIO Scientific Linux 6.x, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.x and 7.x and openSUSE 12.x and 13.1. Please see the file Readme for the full operating system supported.

    This means that you can use the card PCI 7851R in a Linux OS computer is compatible such as Red Hat Enterprise.

    Good day

  • Size of flash memory in the NI PCIe-7851R

    Hello

    How can I know the size of available onboard flash memory in the device of PCIe-7851R?

    Thank you

    Neville

    Hey Neville,

    I need to make a correction to my previous post. The 128 kb of memory is volatile RAM. There are actually 2 MB memory non-volatile Flash bits of files stored on. The following knowledge base article describes it.

    http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/03A50BB86120E930862572F40005ED5C?OpenDocument

    That is why you are able to put your file of 1000 Ko bit on this R-series card flash memory.

    Kind regards

    Josh B

  • IMAQ PCI-1424 compatibility with Labview 8.6

    Hi, the computer that I used for image analysis had a broken motherboard issue, and I replaced it with a new one. I removed both the drives and the jury from the old computer to the new and then installed IMAQ Labview 8.6, but Labview 8.6 is not compatible with the software programmed with labview 5.0, so I uninstalled Labview 8.6 and re-installed Labview 6.0 image processing. I still have some problems to run the Analyzer software and image processing. After you have uninstalled the software or labview, the computer does not start correctly, poping up error as information "check your hard drive to ensure that it is properly configured and completed. Run CHKDSK /F to check for hard drive corruption, and then restart your computer."

    Some basic information on this computer and the image acquisition system (introduced in 2000) are as follows:

    • Windows 2000 operating system;
    • LabVIEW 5.0 basic package;
    • IMAQ vision for Labview advanced;
    • IMAQ PCI-1408, Cables IMAQ-BNC-1 and or-IMAQ for Windows NT / 95;
    • IMAQ-A2504-1 (1 m).
    • Sony XC - 55 1/3 "Interline transfer progressive scan CCD, 659 (H) X 494 (V), C-mount with JB - 77, SERVICES-12 p-02 and DKT503M;
    • Computar H1212FI 1/2 "mount C 12 mm w/focus and iris (10 inches FOV at 24 work dist.);
    • Extension tube Kit Computar VM100;
    • GRAFTEK high frequency fluorescent light 11 ";

    -What hardware IMAQ I use compatible with Labview 6.0 or 8.6? Should I install also drivers for the hardware of the IMAQ when I remove the card IMAQ? All the solutions for my problems? Thank you very much in advance!

    Hi simpra,.

    Here are two links to articles that list compatibility between Windows & LabVIEW and LabVIEW and IMAQ.   Why do you say that the image processign software was not compatible with the LV 8.6?  A message appear?  Or it simply did not work?  Also, are you talking about Module Vision Development, by chance?

    I'm afraid that I can't help hard drive corruption, if that's the case here.  Have you been able to go beyond that?

    My suggestion is to upgrade to the latest version possible.

    I hope this helps!

    Kristen H.

  • Windows 7 64-bit PCI-7813R compatibility & PCI6225 cards.

    We have a desktop PC that works under Windows 7 (64-bit). Labview 2012 64-bit version is compatible with

    PCI-7813R & maps PCI-6225?

    There is no 64-bit versions of the FPGA or RT modules at this time. The interface LabVIEW FPGA host does support 64-bit, but it's just to interface with the target once a bitfile has been deployed and does not allow you to create a new 64-bit LabVIEW bitfiles.

    So, if you are doing development on this machine, you must use the 32-bit version of LabVIEW (works great, even on x 64 OSes). Your hardware all still work no matter what. I just wanted to be clear that for development, you should use the 32-bit version of LabVIEW when working with modules FPGA or RT.

  • PowerEdge T105 server with SAS HBA PCI card compatibility model UCS - 70

    Hello

    We have a PowerEdge T105 server and want to connect Dell LTO-6 SAS Tape drive to this server.

    There are available PCI slots... but I wanted to know if this server can host this HBA card?

    Thank you

    Hello Suren24,

    Here is a link to the map you need to connect the drive LTO6 to. Accessories.us.Dell.com/.../ProductDetail.aspx

    Please let us know if you have any other questions.

  • How can I transfer more 64-bit data to the target host?

    Hi all, I currently use fpga PCIe-7851r card to drive my camera. There were 64 lines to remotely control. So what I did generates the commands on the host pc and transfer it to the target via DMA FIFO. The data type of the FIFO is U64, i.e. each digit control 64 DIO lines. But the issue becomes complex when I transfer 66 command-line. I tried to create 2 FIFOs, but I can hardly do the 2 Sync FIFO.

    I think I might be able to create 2 tables U64, one contains the original 64 line, s command and the other for the 2 line (a loss) information. And then I have them interleave in hospitality and decimate them in the target. There should be enough cycles to it. But I don't think it's a good solution. Is there a better method? Thank you.

    LabVIEW 2009, Windows XP, PCIe-7851R

    Kind regards

    Bo

    Using the techniques highlighted in this tutorial:

    http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/tut/p/ID/4534

    You can use code like this:

  • Compatibility pci Z220

    I have a newly purchased Z220 which replaces an older machine. A criterion for selection of this machine was the backward compatibility of the PCI bus.

    We use a video capture card Srat Tech PEXHDCAP. This because it's pretty much the only PCI card on the market that is actually reliable. However, this is not the question...

    The video capture card uses the interface PCI-e1x (as marked on the motherboard), the PCI bus on the card mother Z220 is marked, "PCIe2" and is advertised as "backward compatibility". The PCI bus is not the video capture card.

    Yes, we have replaced the video card in the machine being replaced and it stil functions in this machine. Yes, we have uninstalled and reinstalled the PCI Buss.

    We have updated the Z220 BIOS to the latest available on HP website.

    I hope HP will step up and provide a solution. However, I welcome all input.

    Hello

    HP has no official presence on this forum that moderation and administration.

    You can get assistance on the HP Enterprise Business Forum.

  • Graphic card vs compatibility PCI - E motherboard

    Hello

    I have a new card in my PC, but I'm afraid a bit with the PCI-E card and the motherboard.
    My PC can be found here: http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c01982717
    While the map I want to buy can be found here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=14-130-827

    I'd rather not settle to learn more or less of this card because it seems very beneficial for the things I do. But let's go hunting. As you can see, I am almost sure that my motherboard is a PCI-E 1.0, while the card I want to buy is a PCI-E 3.0. I also clearly aware that I need to replace the power SUPPLY and the things for this card, so no worries about that. I also measured and it looks perfect. I did some research on compatibility and it seems that they are backward compatible, which is great... but I ran into things on the internet State it is only towards the back-compatible 2.0 and 1.1. Although 8 have read, it will decrease the performance which I'm not terribly worried. If a card is not as powerful as this one but is PCI-E 2.0, that would be fantastic.

    I would like to very positive and in-depth responses from anyone who does not give an answer because I wouldn't rather send the card back or even lose money.

    Thank you

    Peter

    Yes.

    PCIe x 16 2.0 is fully backward compatible with any PCIe x 16 slot.

    It is when you go beyond the 2.0 that you are having problems.

  • Creative Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 PCI sound card drivers compatibility

    Creative Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 the PCI card is not compatible for 64 bit Windows 7. I tried this system does not detect automatically or manually. If anyone has the driver please post the link or the other using this card with windows 7 then tell me how it installed.

    I got creative sound blaster live 5.1 PCI sound card then visit this link but it does not work... not compatible with windows 7... : ()

    The Webcam Live! sound card was "placed" as a "legacy" product until Windows 7 was first be "shipped".  You will have a problem finding drivers and even less how it works.  I tried the "replacement: Audigy to work on my Windows 7 and it was a new model from Creative Labs."

    You should probably consider a replacement of the sound card.

  • Compaq Presario SG3550IL: compatibility of an adapter pci wireless on your old desktop of 8 years

    Hello, I have a confusion on that I want to install Adapter PCI express wireless in my old PC but I'm not sure it will support or not. I want to make this PC has enabled the wireless (WIFI) network, I currently have a graphics card installed to rest all the PCI slots are free.

    It comes to the specifications of my computer desk - http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c01383110

    It's the one thing I intend to install-

    http://www.TP-link.com/LK/products/details/cat-11_TL-WN881ND.html

    Please help me with this

    @Ryuzaki, welcome to the forum.

    The adapter in your link should work fine.  It is said that it is compatible with Win 7.

    Please click on the button + Thumbs up if I helped you and click on accept as Solution If your problem is resolved.

  • QT587AA - HP USB 3.0 PCIe x 1 compatibility

    Hello! I want to upgrade my HP Pavilion Slimline S5 - 1030uk LN920EA (including motherboard M2N68-(Narra6)) with QT587AA (HP USB 3.0 Port SuperSpeed PCIe x 1 2 x 2 card), but I don't know if it's completely compatibile. Could someone answer me please?

    Hi Omaco78, your motherboard has two the PCIE expansion slots.

    the QT587AA will fit very well as long as you have a free slot and do not use these connectors for extension for something else

    Here is a tutorial on how to properly install expansion card:

    http://h20565.www2.HP.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.page/public/PSI/setupInstallDisplay/?sp4ts.Oid=5080757 & spf_p.tpst = psiContentDisplay & spf_p.prp_psiContentDisplay=wsrp-navigationalState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c02916983-13%257CdocLocale%253Den_US & javax.portlet.begCacheTok = com.vignette.cachetoken & javax.portlet.endCacheTok = com.vignette.cachetoken

    ADI.

  • N Alvorix-RS880-Μatx, mini PCI compatibility.

    I have this computer: http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c02629593

    I would like to be able to upgrade the Wi - Fi card. The current 'integrated' card in what I can identify as a machine slot "mini PCI express. Every ounce of research I did said that there should be documentation that tells me what are the cards will work with the motherboard. but I can not find this material anywhere.

    If anyone knows where I should look for this documentation, I would be grateful!

    Specifically, the map I want must be able to strips 5.0 GHz and 2.4 GHz, so to have the bluetooth feature.

    I already bought an Intel Centrino card from this page: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007QXLIU0/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 and had to return, as the drivers do not work on my PC. I contacted Intel support and all they could tell me was that I needed to find the above documentation for my motherboard.

    -Stephen

    Ok thank you. This is useful. I'm not sure what Intel you expect to do with 'literature '. Your motherboard is here: http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c02560084
    ... who says just you have a mini PCIe location. I noticed that the Amazon reviews were mixed. It seemed to work for most people, but there were a few that had similar problems. Looks like the people who had questions were configurations ASUS/AMD... that yours is as well. I imagine that this Intel card would work pretty well along with an Intel chipset. Like you, I found nothing of system requirements Intel on this product that he mentions would be incompatible with a PCIe version sort. I'm puzzled. I can not recommend one brand over another, but a little research for one that works better with an AMD chipset?

  • Compatibility of Mini-PCI HP Pavillion DV4-1281us & BT/Wifi cards?

    It's the Ralink RT3090BC4 half minicards N-Wifi with Bluetooth RT3090, HP p/n: 602992-001, compatible with my HP Pavillion DV4-1281us laptop as a replacement for the original Intel Wifi card?

    Thank you!

    Hello

    Check the page #5 this Book:

    h10032.www1.HP.com/CTG/manual/c01597750.PDF

    Kind regards.

  • Compatibility «?» (Mac Pro Tower / Firewire / climax together, etc..)

    I take Logic Pro 9, but after looking at all the improvements for Logic Pro X, I can't wait to get up to speed.

    I like the look of the improvements to the plug-in; logic adding distance (not available for LP9?); Drum Kit Designer, synthesizer, etc.

    When he (LP10) announced that there is a flagrant limitation I had with my current set-up but I don't remember what the hiccup was... perhaps there is none and I could be good-to-go.  Can anyone confirm if and where I'm looking at compatibility problems?

    System: Mac Pro Tower (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xenon

    OS: 10.10.5 (Yosemite)

    Interface: Climax together - Firewire

    If I remember, the question I met was first introduced with the announcement of Logic Pro X was he needed El Capitan - which did not offer the divers "Core Audio" / support, which means that overall height (Firewire) would be uncertain if even not work at all.  "" Looking at the "tech specs" on Logic Pro X, it supports OS X 10.10.  That looks promising (if it in fact the issue with El Capitan and the lack of support for Core Audio driver still exists).

    Can I run Logic Pro X to Yosemite?

    Can I run overall height (FireWire) in El Capitan without the Core Audio Driver issues / Firewire?

    Thanks in advance!

    I must add, additional hardware, I am running is a UAD PCI card in the tower.

Maybe you are looking for