OSB: Proxy proxy publish async

Similar Questions

• OSB: Proxy Service Configuration

  If I understand the "Proxy service" called the service '' Business. ''
  When I set up the "ProxyService" so it should be a section of 'Service create existing' in the 'General Configuration '.
  
  But in my workshop, I don't see the "Create from existing Service" section.
  There is no way I can bind the Proxy and services businesses.
  
  No idea why this article is missing in my workbench and how to solve?

  But in my workshop, I don't see the "Create from existing Service" section.

  Not sure why it is not available with work table.

  There is no way I can bind the Proxy and services businesses.

  You can bind services to businesses with a proxy service yet. What you need to do, it's that configure the workflow of the proxy and mail flow messages add a node of the route. From this node, you can call the business service.

  Alternatively, you can add pipeline request and response in mail flow (before the node of the route) and you can use publish/service legend action from there to call a business service.

  Please see-

  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E13159_01/OSB/docs10gr3/Userguide/modelingmessageflow.html

  Kind regards
  Anuj

• using weblogic unit-of-order (PUA) in the osb proxy service

  Hello
  
  I have a deployed on Weblogic server JMS queue. The messages in the queue are grouped using Weblogic JMS_BEA_Unit-of-order (PUA).
  
  Now, I have an OSB 10 g of Proxy Service that reads messages from the queue. The problem is, upon receipt of a message, acknowledgement of receipt is sent immediately, thus eliminating the message from the queue and the next with the same unit-Of-Order message is ready for processing.
  
  But the business scenario is the first message to read, processed and then decide to recognise or not. The second message should not be interpreted, unless the previous message is processed successfully.
  
  Can someone help with this scenario?
  
  Thank you
  Alex
  
  Published by: user9024636 on February 11, 2010 02:57

  with PUA, you'll need to do the syschronous transaction.
  1. make transacation enable XA
  2 using the road for the sychrounous transaction
  3. use the routing options, and then select mode = request-respone
  4. If the Proxy service is based on the jms then you should also together WHAT JMS Transport-> Advance settings-> XA is required-> checked

  Kind regards
  http://SOA-Street.blogspot.com

• Operational situation in OSB Proxy logging

  Hi all

  I'm trying to set the logging level to 'ERROR' for proxy I have, but every time that the project is deployed the setting is to be overloaded with the value 'DEBUG '. Is there a way of this package with the code or make this setting persistent in the proxy, even after the redeployment?

  Aditya

  Hi Aditya,

  Check the script here...

  https://docs.Oracle.com/middleware/1221/OSB/administer/GUID-7535D97D-6EBD-4969-8A6D-C736B44C5555.htm#OSBAG-GUID-DDE7E532-F62A-435D-9C8A-38AD51BEE063

  See you soon,.

  Vlad

• Message access control in the OSB proxy service when the Service Type is the Any SOAP Service

  Hello

  We have a proxy OSB service where the Service Type is 'no matter what SOAP Service'. We use Auth.xml to authenticate messages to achieve this proxy service.

  It is, ca we apply Message this proxy access control so that only user A is allowed to sent message has and only user B is allowed to message sent B?

  Us know if the proxy OSB service is based on a wsdl, then we can apply access control message for each operation in the Security tab - and thus specify which user can access the operation. But unfortunately, we have not a wsdl, because this service proxy is a proxy gateway and must accept any SOAP message reaches.

  For example, if the user name in the SOAP header is msgAUser, get is accepted.

  "< soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">"

  < soapenv:Header >

  "< xmlns:wsse wsse: Security ="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">."

  < wsse: UsernameToken >

  < wsse:Username >msgAUser< / wsse:Username >

  < wsse:Password >msgApwd< / wsse:Password >

  < / wsse: UsernameToken >

  < / wsse: Security >

  < / soapenv:Header >

  < soapenv:Body >

  <Get>

  ...

  < /Get>

  < / soapenv:Body >

  < / soapenv:Envelope >

  If the user name in the SOAP header is msgBUser, then MessageB is accepted.

  "< soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">"

  < soapenv:Header >

  "< xmlns:wsse wsse: Security ="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">."

  < wsse: UsernameToken >

  < wsse:Username >msgBUser< / wsse:Username >

  < wsse:Password >msgBpwd< / wsse:Password >

  < / wsse: UsernameToken >

  < / wsse: Security >

  < / soapenv:Header >

  < soapenv:Body >

  <MessageB>

  ...

  < /MessageB>

  < / soapenv:Body >

  < / soapenv:Envelope >

  Any suggestions please?

  Understood.

  My current client, we have faced the same problem and implemented a similar design which nevertheless has important benefits.

  The problem with proxy input all SOAP is not only in the complexities of authentication. Most important, resources fine grain (thread) management becomes impossible: proxy entry has a workmanager, one constraint of son max. If any single service behind entered proxy knows an influx of requests (because of a peak or a misconfigured customer), he eats the workmanager dry and the rest of the services become too inadmissible.

  In this spirit, we have implemented the following diagram. It's a little more complicated, but it serves us well for a few years already:

  EntryProxy 1-> Interceptor entering Proxy-> Proxy 1

  EntryProxy 2-> Interceptor entering Proxy-> Proxy 2

  ...

  Enter proxy doesn't do Nothing but shall forward the request for interception of incoming traffic. Power of Attorney of the entry, however, has its own WSDL, authentication and the workmanager which allows precise control.

  Another important aspect of a proxy of the entry, it is that it passes a custom header containing the name of the destination of the interceptor, e.g. TargetURI = "ProxyService/Paypal/Paypal.

  Incoming Interceptor Proxy performs all recording, the error handling and other common tasks.

  Then, according to the last header, the proxy of the interceptor makes a dynamic call to route to the specified destination.

  Yes, this design has an additional moving part - a proxy entry - but he a) works b) guard control all in our hands. The entry proxy is a very small point; When I need to make a new one, I just copy an existing one and replace the WSDL file and the value of the TargetURI - 30 seconds of work.

  Hope that helps.

  Vlad

  http://vladimirdyuzhev.com

• OSB Proxy Service execution Timeout

  Dear Experts,
  
  How can I configure Oracle Service Bus proxy service timeout exactly? My scenario requires several service legend.
  
  Thanks in advance.
  Mike.Di

  Mike,

  Yes, the proxy of the OSB will continue running if it has launched its own transaction until the JTA timeout / any other service call error timeout/all occurs, whichever comes first (in this case the flow moves to the error handler). If proxy is running in the context of overall transaction that began at the source and then global transaction gets abandoned, then execution of the proxy will also get abandoned.

  I'll start proxy via the test console.

  This will fall in the first case (where OSB starts its own transaction)

  Kind regards
  Anuj

• BEA-382051 any transaction not found on the OSB Proxy Service

  Hello
  
  I have a proxy mq service and that has properties enabled for 1. Mandatory transaction 2. Same operation required for a response. Also added routing with QoS Options to "Exactly Once" actions to publish and c/o Service.
  
  MQ proxyQ-> proxy1 local-> localPS11-> localPS12-> localPS13
  MQ proxyQ-> local proxy2-> localPS21-> localPS22-> localPS23
  
  All these PS11, 12,... have publish and service a/s for various DB operations such as readBS, insertBS and updateBS.
  
  I searched a few threads in the forum, Anuj has also suggested to activate Options routing with QoS to "Exactly Once".
  What I did is I added and allowed to c/o/Publishing Service requesting this property [insertPS-> insertBS] and [updatePS-> updateBS] only.
  * NOT for [readPS-> readBS] area.*
  
  What is the cause of this error? I mean, what do I need to enable to publish them all and s. c/o actions regardless of readPS or updatePS?
  I also tried with httpProxy instead of mqProxyService service
  
  Error: BEA-382051 any transaction not found on the current Thread
  
  Your suggestion is very apprecited.
  
  Thank you
  
  Edited by: 1002815 may 6, 2013 07:59

  Yes, no need to add this legend and node of Road Service by participating in the overall transaction by default.

  Kind regards
  Anuj

• Question about the OSB proxy service

  Hello
  
  I'm new to the world of SOA/OSB. I'm working on a POC from the OSB for our existing application. I have a question about the definition of the URL endpoint to the proxy service. It is possible to specify a generic url endpoint to a proxy service. Something like / SomeService / *. I tried and got errors. Is it possible to do somethig like that or it is a mistake on a conceptual level.
  
  Thank you

  anything you type in the uri of the endpoint of entry will be the contextroot to your service, so /SomeService should indeed be sufficient or as mentioned Pierluigi/SomeService/blabla is also valid (Betty is not a parameter query, but only a part of the contextroot)

  If you want to use a service like http rest

  / SomeService/blabla would still be the contextroot, and after that, you can use the query parameters

  / SomeService/badarou? var1 = test & var2 = test or/SomeService/blabla/employee/id/1

• Search for OSB proxy service

  I create a dynamic road in a proxy OSB service. Is there a way to search for a service proxy by using its 'Endpoint URI"?
  
  Thanks for any help!
  
  The f

  I think that Pascal describes the only possible way for your case.

  As far as I understand, you want to have a function that looks somehow in the current configuration. Something like getProxyByEndpoint(). Am I wrong? I had a similar need, so I filled the enhancement request in Oracle support. I encourage you to do the same. You will not get your service anytime soon, but someday maybe... :-)

  There is a huge 'thinking skills' gap in OSB. I think that we can help make OSB a better product describing our needs in an enhancement request form.

• OSB Proxy: response with failure: not getting caught in BPEL CatchAll block

  Hello
  
  I have a scenario where the Composite SOA name PS of OSB. In the PS OSB error handler, I use a response with failure at the end, and when this happens, the flow does not block the BPEL Tote, rather than the BPEL flow is get executed successfully. I believe that when we meet with failure (code 500), the current should go to the customer error handler.
  
  Please someone confirm what is the expected behavior.
  
  Thanks in advance.

  have you tried to call in the service of soapui and check the weather, you receive an envelope of soap fault?

  You can try to replace the body in the handler service error with a fault (hardcoded) soap envelope, simply too self how the capture of bpel is on it

  http://www.xenta.nl/Blog/2010/07/17/Oracle-service-bus-11g-handling-SOAP-faults/
  Maybe one is of no use

  We use the same in our middleware implementations and catches in bpel works very well for use (response failure + failure in the SOAP body)

• Consume message JMS work through proxy OSB service unit

  Hello

  Someone knows how to consume a unit of work (UOW) JMS message using a type of OSB Proxy Service of JMS?

  I can present a work unit JMS message (which is composed of several constituent messages) using a combination of service OSB proxy & business and defining the UOW transport headers properly. I can also separately produce and consume Java objects via a JMS queue where consumption is made via the proxy OSB (of type java request message), but these are not messages UOW.

  Apparently, as soon as it is a message of the UOW then consumed message is ObjectMessage ArrayList and we use the type of 'Java' request for the proxy consumer JMS message, but I'm not sure of how to create the jar of simultaneous customers for use in the transport configuration of the proxy service same JMS for output ObjectMessage ArrayList (message UOW).

  Ideally I would like to consume a single UOW XML message via a proxy OSB JMS service.

  Pointers would be appreciated.

  R

  Finally got this working!

  For posterity: necessary to insert messages JMS Java object on the side of the producer (Business Service) OSB JMS with UOW correct jms header set in the node of the transport route. Then consume the message of working group on the other side via the proxy service of jms with "java" request message type, with appropriate jar containing the class of the object as the 'Customer' jar in Transport JMS configuration. In the same JMS consumer proxy I had to make a legend of java, by transmitting the contents of $body, using java.util.ArrayList and javax.jms.ObjectMessage as entry in a method (.. decodeJavaMessage (ArrayList ...)). In this legend of java class, you can get to each ObjectMessage individual via the cast method get() on Arraylist to (ObjectMessage) and then just catalogued the getObject() on this Objectmessage in your original Java class (the same as what you have inserted initially on the queue).

  I hope someone saves some time in the future!

• How to get the OSB to stop adding port # in a published WSDL endpoint

  This is the thread more close to you I could find in my question, but is still not quite what I'm looking for: How to get the ip number in WSDL instead of host name? I have a server behind a VIP of the OSB, and I publish a proxy for external customer service to call. The VIP only accepts connections over SSL/https. OSB hosts only services over http port 80, and the VIP manages connectivity and security between them.
  
  I wrote a wsdl by hand, set my endpoint address (https) VIP point, has created the proxy service and deployed to the OSB. I can test the service throughout the day in SoapUI calling the VIP, well. However, when the client calls https://VIP/myService/?wsdl, he sees endpoint from the wsdl populated as http://VIP/myService:80.
  
  How can I prevent the OSB adding: 80 endpoint in the wsdl file? This makes it unusable for any appellant client generate the code by calling? WSDL, so we have to export the wsdl file and schema files and provide customers by hand. What configuration settings we can change that will fix this behavior?

  We had the same problem.
  in the cluster/http configuration, change the HTTP/HTTPS port number, which will appear in the generated WSDL from the frontend

• No matter what xml Vs mail proxy service

  I am bit confused about the difference between any xml service and mail service with the type of request message of XML in osb proxy service config. any help pls?

  Hello

  If you use a load XML in and out, I don't see much difference...

  See here...

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E28280_01/dev.1111/e15866/ui_ref.htm#i1318149

  Service - select this option to create a service that can receive messages from e-mail data, type and respond with messages of a different data type.

  Any Service XML - select this option to create an XML service that does not have an explicitly defined interface and concrete.

  See you soon,.

  Vlad

• OSB Service post a Message in the queue JMS twice or duplicate

  Hello

  I have an adapter of the poll of OSB Proxy Service database

  Strategy of the poll: logic of delete

  Column name: status

  Read value: P

  Unread value: N

  Form #1:

  Change of status to "n" and given an end point valid URI of the JMS queue

  Success: DBAdapter > > OSBProxy > > PublishToJMSQ and the situation has changed to 'P '.

  Form #2:

  Change in status of "n" and in view of an invalid endpoint URI of the JMS queue. That is to say, remove resources from JMS queue

  Error: DBAdapter > > OSBProxy > > OSBBusinessService (@Service Error Handler) > > DBAdatper and the situation has changed to 'E '.

  Both work as expected when they are tested one by one. However, if I change #1 & 2 # Record Record and commit at the same time, the status changes to 'P' and 'E' correctly, but the message is published in the JMSQ TWICE (Duplicate) of the first disc. Please note the folder payload #1 and #2 are different.

  It is a behavior strange and unable to understand why it's happening and how it is resolved.

  The two ""required Transaction ","Same Transaction for answer"were not affected ways unchecked. "

  I took non - XA Datasources and QoS in road @Stage activity Publish Options is exactly once. And the version is 12 c

  Your help is very appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello, the problem has been resolved by defining lines of data per Transaction on 1 in the DB adapter configuration.

• Non-transactional Database query in OSB 12 c

  Hello

  I "ve a scenario like this:"

  Success: DBAdapter > > OSBProxy > > PublishToJMSQ and status-> P

  Error: DBAdapter > > OSBProxy > > OSBBusinessService (@Service Error Handler) > > DBAdatper and status-> E

  Strategy of the poll: logic of delete

  Column name: status

  Read the value: P

  Unread value: N

  
  

  Error in the stream of the OSB, the status set to 'E', but do not be RolledBack to P. (That's what the case currently)

  DB one adapter queries a table on a field, status and connected to the OSB proxy service. READING message is published in JMS Q via OSB business. The status field should be updated to E error via an adapter DB one another through business services.

  I tried several options but could not get the expected behavior. I want to achieve no transactional behaviors that to get what I think.

  Could you let me know your thoughts. Also can you tell me if I need transactional or non-transactional this scenario.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Krishna, thanks for your response.

  In fact, the flow goes well only. However, restoration takes place after update the field to 'E' error.

  If there is an error, it is nothing that we can do on the pipeline no response?

  I solved this problem so that you have two data sources and make sure all are no-XAs only.

  Enjoy your time.