Similar Questions

• VPN Config after PIX of the utility of Conversion of ASA

  After that I ran the PIX of the Conversion of the ASA tool he changed my key was she in a single asterisk.  It will work or did the utility BUMBLE?  Here is an example:

  xxx.117.34.5 tunnel ipsec-attributes group

  pre-shared-key *.

  Thank you

  Thomas

  Thomas,

  I've never used it, but if you want to check the following command on the SAA isue.

  more: the execution of the system-config

  If you still see asterisks with this command key must then be reinstated. Otherwise, you should see the real keys.

  I hope this helps.

  Raga

• PIX led to the issue of ACL conversion

  In a simple 3 legs PIX Setup with a single conduit allowing access from the outside of a DMZ host and no restrictions on traffic inside for external connections; How convert leads him to an ACL on the external interface, which will allow the outside to traffic to DMZ host, without a showdown of the return traffic from the inside to the outside connections?

  David

  Hi David -.

  Leo did a great job of answering your exact configuration.

  Let's look at the ASA - algorithm Adaptive State - which is at the heart of the pix for more details to respond to your questions above.

  We scroll a scenario-

  1 - packet is received on an interface

  2 is part of package of existing stream?

  Yes - accept the package and pass it on.

  No - continue through this routine

  3 - ACL exists on the interface?

  Yes - treat against ACL

  No - go to step 5

  4 - Pack of process against the ACL on the interface.

  Permitted by the ACL - traffic and create the State

  Denied by the ACL - drop and log in if necessary

  5 - since there is no ACL and there is no State, use the levels of security associated with the interfaces to determine behavior.

  Interface from upper to lower?

  Yes - permits and establishing State

  No - Drop and log if necessary

  The example above does not take account of appropriate translations that need to be configured.

  I'll get a more detailed example of the behaviour ASA on CCO.

  Give me your thoughts on the above.

  Thank you

  Peter

• W2000 PPTP in the path through the PIX PIX

  Inside of a configured simple PIX I have a w2000 customer VPN with PPTP. The client cannot talk to one another otside PIX configured with VPDN.

  Everything works as expected if I put in a nat-Firewall NETGEAR801 instead of PIX siple.

  See PIX config and syslog. Waths evil?

  6.2 (2) version PIX

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  activate 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted password

  FAXRuw8pF2Tl7oBe encrypted passwd

  HMS host name

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol they 389

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  names of

  access-list acl_outside allow icmp a whole

  access-list acl_outside allow accord a

  Allow Access-list acl_outside esp a whole

  pager lines 24

  opening of session

  recording of debug console

  recording of debug trap

  host of logging inside the 194.132.183.10

  interface ethernet0 10baset

  interface ethernet1 10baset

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  external IP 217.215.220.221 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 194.132.183.2 255.255.255.192

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  Access-group acl_outside in interface outside

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 217.215.220.1 1

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0: 10:00 udp 0:02:00 CPP 0: h323 from 10:00 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  No sysopt route dnat

  NSM #.

  Syslog sed:

  % 305011-6-PIX: built a dynamic TCP conversion of ide:194.132.183.10/1366 to outside:217.215.220.221/1124

  % 302013-6-PIX: built 212 for outbound TCP connection: 194.71.189.109/1723 (194.71.189.109/1723) to inside:194.132.183.10/1366 217.215.220.221/1124)

  % 3 PIX-305006: failure of the regular creation of translation for the internal protocol 47 src: 194.132.183.10 outside dst: 194.71.189.109

  % 3 PIX-305006: failure of the regular creation of translation for the internal protocol 47 src: 194.132.183.10 outside dst: 194.71.189.109

  % 3 PIX-305006: failure of the regular creation of translation for the internal protocol 47 src: 194.132.183.10 outside dst: 194.71.189.109

  % 3 PIX-305006: failure of the regular creation of translation for the internal protocol 47 src: 194.132.183.10 outside dst: 194.71.189.109

  % 302014-6-PIX: disassembly of the TCP connection 212 for side:194.71.189.109/1723 to inside:194.132.183.10/1366 duration 0:00:10 TCP fins 788 bytes

  First off I would say don't not cut and paste your config PIX here, or at the x.x.x.x at least on your external IP address.

  The PIX does not support PPTP thru PAT (nat/global). PPTP uses the Protocol IP 47 (GRE), and the PIX cannot PAT these cause there is no TCP/UDP port number to use.

  PIX 6.3 code it will however support, but it won't be available until the beginning of next year. At the moment the only way to circumvent your situation is to define a one-to-one NAT translation for this internal host. Something like:

  > static (inside, outside) 217.215.220.222 194.132.183.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  will do for you, providing you 217.215.220.222 routed and available. I would also change

  > acl_outside of access list allow accord a

  TO

  > acl_outside gre 194.71.189.109 allowed access list host 217.215.220.222

  It's a little safer.

• pix 501 vpn problem

  Can connect, I see not all network resources.

  The Vpn Client, worm: 5.0.01, is running on an xp machine.

  It connects to the network is behind a 6.3 (5) pix501-worm.

  When the connection is established the remote client gets an address assigned to the pool 192.168.2.10 vpn - 192.168.2.25:

  The vpn client log shows:

  Line: 45 18:07:27.898 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100034

  The virtual card has been activated:

  IP=192.168.2.10/255.255.255.0

  DNS = 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  WINS = 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Area =

  Split = DNS names

  It is followed by these lines:

  46 18:07:27.968 12/08/09 Sev = WARNING/2 CVPND/0xE3400013

  AddRoute cannot add a route: code 87

  Destination 192.168.1.255

  Subnet mask 255.255.255.255

  Gateway 192.168.2.1

  Interface 192.168.2.10

  47 18:07:27.968 12/08/09 Sev = WARNING/2 CM/0xA3100024

  Failed to add the route. Network: c0a801ff, subnet mask: ffffffff, Interface: c0a8020a Gateway: c0a80201.

  48 18:07:28.178 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100038

  Were saved successfully road to file changes.

  49 18:07:28.198 12/08/09 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100036

  The routing table has been updated for the virtual card

  50 18:07:29.760 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM/0x6310001A

  A secure connection established

  * ...

  I can ping the remote client, on an inside ip behind the same pix

  When I get the 'route add failure' above, but I cannot ping the computer name.

  I activated traversal of NAT using the PDM, but when I connect with this option, I get the error that the "remote endpoint is NOT behind a NAT device this end is behind a NAT device" and ping fails.

  Behind the pix are a few computers with no central server, so I'm failed a WINS server for remote clients.

  I created the vpn with the wizard.

  The configuration file is attached.

  Any suggestion would be appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Hugh

  Hugh, sure you can classify based on the whole conversation, but you don't have to do but be certainly provide assessments.

  To sum up the shrinking global problems, the main objective was to ensure configuration VPN RA on the PIX501 has been corrected.

  1. we have enabled NAT - T on the firewall - even if it wasn't the question, but need it either it should you RA other places - travseral NAT VPN sensitizes the firewall on the other ends NAT devices - here is some good information on NAT - T for reference in the future

  http://www.Microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/cableguy/cg0802.mspx

  2. we fixed the VPN-POOL/28 network as well as the access list and acl to be coherent crypto sheep.

  Here is a link for future reference with many PIX configuration scenarios

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/prod_configuration_examples_list.html

  Finally, your only question remaining, we can say is purely isolated with the customer software vpn and MAC machine.

  You could maybe try a different version of the client in the MAC, or also look at the release notes for the open caveats to avoid cisco cleint managing versions and MAC versions if there are problems.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/prod_release_notes_list.html

  Concerning

• Pix access lists

  I am facing convert statements leads on our PIX 520 access lists. Is there a better way to do this will be as little as possible traffic interruption? For example, to create access lists and then remove the conduit, or vice versa?

  Second, is there a priority recommended in order to access list?

  Hello

  This is a very good paper on the conversion of lines to the ACL, also when writing ACL always have your most important ACL on top of the ACL work from the top down. When you make changes to the ACL or static lines always issue the command clear xlate and save with RAM command.

  http://www.giac.org/practical/GSEC/Bill_Donaldson_GSEC.pdf - by Bill Donaldson, GSEC.

  If you want more information/inf, then let me know.

  Thank you / Jay.

• PIX - ACL order

  Hello

  a year before, this is a conversation about the issue on the agenda in which the PIX - ACL are applied.

  There where some of the different opinions about it.

  Are applied on a basis first match as IOS - ACL or on an adjusted basis?

  I remember someone saying that the old 'led' - statements have been applied to the adjusted basis.

  Is this good? and what does "adjusted"?

  And what of the ACL?

  "If they are not applied" first match "it wouldn't make sense to give them an order in the MDP.

  Another question: I wonder how the PDM can add rules in the middle of the access list without disrupting traffic. In IOS - ACL without sequence numbers, I have to rewrite the entire ACL to change a line in the middle.

  ducts - adjusted

  ACL - first match

  Adjustment of the means that the PIX will scan all lines and choose the one that * best * corresponds to the traffic (source/destination/ports etc...).

  The PIX does not run IOS. You can remove a line of an ACL without removing the entire ACL.

  Scott

• PIX SMTP NAT or Port based NAT?

  I have what may seem like a strange question...

  I have a client with a PIX and a SMTP server inside their network. They were using a NAT Port basis via the following command (all IP addresses are changed to protect the innocent):

  static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 tcp smtp 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 smtp

  It worked well for incoming and outgoing email except to go to particular mail servers. What was going on, it was that they were receiving messages from rebound as below:

  Where IP address 1.1.1.2 combined with overall command of the client.

  Once I changed the nat to use a normal NAT rather than on a port a whole worked well. Download

  static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255

  My question is can I do nat based on the port works for IP addressing in the two directions or am I stuck with the help of a single IP NAT?

  I guess what is happening, is that the NAT based on the port looks only to conversations from the incoming direction (ie the conversation is with port 25 on 192.168.0.1), no conversations from the outgoing direction (ie the conversation is with port 25 on an external IP address).

  Rgds,

  Peter

  Excellent analysis and you are immediately. Just a simple set-config that lack of most people. Try the following:

  static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 tcp smtp 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 smtp

  Global 2 1.1.1.1 (outside)

  NAT (inside) 2 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255

  The static method will match the traffic from port 25 to the mail server. So when your mail server sends outgoing traffic on one port other that the 25, he uses the nat/global configuration you have defined for the other hosts on the inside interface. Who obviously doesn't like the other e-mail server.

  Hope that's clear, but if not, let me know.

  Scott

• Security IOS vs PIX Firewall / ASA

  Could someone point me to some docs on cisco.com in comparing the use of an IOS on a secure router & using a cisco firewall? I want to use a SRI w/fix ios if possible but don't know if I can lock the outside of the network as well as I could with a pix or asa, so I want to make sure I'm doing everything I can and do the right thing. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  There is a discussion in this forum on this topic; Check "Firewalling: PIX vs IOS Firewall" last conversation was released January 10, 2006. Let me know then if it helps.

  Rgrds,

  Haitham

• Difference b/w PIX & router (router with the firewall option)

  Hi all

  I want to know that how we can differ with router (router with the firewall option) PIX bcz can also make Staefull packet filtering. What PIX device that reviewed by the customer to use PIX of the router.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Guelma

  Hello

  There is a discussion in this forum on this topic; Check "Firewalling: PIX vs IOS Firewall" last conversation was released January 10, 2006. Let me know if it helps.

  Rgrds,

  Haitham

• PIX 515E without NAT from upper to lower

  Dear all,

  Pls find attached schema and configuration PIX 102 and 105 PIX.

  Network 192.168.105.x, 192.168.102.x can communicate with the outside world and from the outside we can access 192.168.102.x some open ports.

  192.168.105.1is on the interface of higher security and 192.168.102.3 is on the low safety for PIX105 interface.

  192.168.105.x can communicate with 192.168.102.x using NAT.

  Now the question is:

  192.168.105.x cannot communicate with 192.168.102.x without Tried NAT. using the special conversion rules and Nat 0 but cannot continue to communicate.

  192.168.105.X is unable to connect to 192.168.101.x (road via PIX 102 and router)

  192.168.101.X cannot communicate with 192.168.102.x

  I don't want NAT to use between 192.168.105.x, 192.168.102.x and 192.168.101.X

  Grateful if you can help do ASAP

  Kind regards

  Prashanth

  you said "192.168.101.x need to access 192.168.102.x for object group dc."

  provide that you will speak the traffic is initiated by sous-reseau.101 for sous-reseau.102, then you need to apply another State on pix102.

  for example

  static (intf2, inside) 192.168.101.0 192.168.101.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  clear xlate

  Apart from that, I see no error with the two pix, the config of the router config.

  to check the question it either relates to the data center router, try ping pix102.

  First, ping the int data center router series, then ping the router the data center sous-reseau.101.

• Lost remote access to the internal network after upgarding PIX to 7.0

  I improved our box of PIX 515E Cisco to release 6.3 7.0 (5) and lost connectivity outside of the internal servers through a VPN connection. Any ideas as to why or how this happened?

  If you use the split tunneling, this is probably the question.

  Is the bug id: CSCeh69389

  This Bug says:

  When you upgrade a PIX 6.x to 7.0, if split tunneling is underway

  used for remote access clients, then the conversion of config

  process will not convert the list of split tunnel command, because

  the ACL of splitting 6.x tunnel was allowed to be of type 'expanded '.

  whereas in 7.0 the ACL must be ' standard '.

  To solve the problem, take the extended ACL and manually convert it to a

  Standard ACL, specifying the networks you want encrypted. Times

  the new ACL is in the config, it must be applied under the

  Group Policy.

  EX:

  SplitTunnel list standard access allowed 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  internal RemoteAccess group strategy

  Group Policy attributes RemoteAccess

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list SplitTunnel

• Outlook web app on the pix firewall

  Hi guru firewall,.

  Can someone here help me install my firewall cisco to work for external outlook web access. I changed a few settings and do turn internally... However I can't access outside.

  That means, when I open outlook web app on our LAN that it works, but when I try to open it via internet ISP I can not open it... "page not found".

  Pls advice how you it is resolved through the configuration of firewall pix if anyone of you has met the same thing.

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Jeric

  Jeric,

  I am very surprised to read this thread. I really appreciate your effort to do this task.

  I said, listen to me, don't forget to add a statement static so that this works, but I'm not saying you port coz I'm still looking for it.

  I had a good conversation with our cisco consultant Ken. I show him the config and it's what Ken told me to do.

  We lack this static entry.

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface www inside_mail_server www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  also add to this list of access

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq www

  Pls let me know the result. Hope that the system will work.

  PLS, do not forget to 'Clearly Xlate' and save it.

  See you soon.

  Dennis

• Convert the VPN Site-to-Site of PIX to ASA 8.2

  I worked on the conversion of a config above a PIX an ASA 8.2 but I am running into trouble with the site to site vpn. The PIX has a VPN client and site to site. Given that some of the configs for the cross from site to site on the VPN client I'm confuse. Any help would be apperciated.

  Below are excerpts from just the PIX VPN related orders.

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 list Remote_splitTunnelAcl 255.255.0.0 any

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl ip access list allow any 192.168.0.160 255.255.255.240

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl Zenoss_OS CNP 255.255.255.0 ip host allowed access list

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl SilverBack NOC 255.255.255.0 ip host allowed access list

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl allowed host NOC 255.255.255.0 enoss_Hardware ip access-list

  outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 ip access list allow any 192.168.0.160 255.255.255.240

  outside_cryptomap_20 Zenoss_OS CNP 255.255.255.0 ip host allowed access list

  outside_cryptomap_20 SilverBack NOC 255.255.255.0 ip host allowed access list

  outside_cryptomap_20 Zenoss_Hardware CNP 255.255.255.0 ip host allowed access list

  IP pool local DHCP_Pool 192.168.0.161 - 192.168.0.174

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl

  Sysopt connection permit VPN

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac

  Dynamic crypto map outside_dyn_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 value

  outside_map 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto outside_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_20

  card crypto outside_map 20 peers set 205.x.29.41

  outside_map crypto 20 card value transform-set ESP-DES-SHA

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  client authentication card crypto outside_map LOCAL

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key address 205.x.29.41 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-config-mode no.

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 180

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 20

  ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash

  20 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 40

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 40

  ISAKMP policy 40 sha hash

  40 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 40 86400

  vpngroup address pool DHCP_Pool GHA_Remote

  vpngroup dns 192.168.0.11 server GHA_Remote

  vpngroup wins 192.168.0.11 GHA_Remote-Server

  vpngroup GHA_Remote by default-field x.org

  vpngroup split tunnel Remote_splitTunnelAcl GHA_Remote

  vpngroup idle 1800 GHA_Remote-time

  vpngroup password KEY GHA_Remote

  I guess what I really wonder is if someone can convert the version of site to site of this VPN ASA 8.2 config so I can compare it to what I have. I need to have this, so I can just fall into place and work.

  Also, it does appear that political isakmp 40 are used, correct?

  On your ASA in Setup mode, simply type vpnsetup steps for remote access ipsec or vpnsetup site - not and it lists what it takes or you can download the PIX of the ASA migration tool.

• English Mail App - rated to organiser a conversation

  Mail - nominal date Organizer app a conversation?

  Hello

  In the Mail (on Sierra) application I organize my conversations by mail.

  In Inbox, I can sort my emails by date, but you'd host a conversation by date?

  Car the current presentation organizes me them from the oldest to the newest. And me I want from the most recent to the oldest...

  What may seem logical for some is not pay others. When a 200 mails in a conversation and we want to avoid going down with her laetitia down pour mail to meet the last ;-)

  I would like to add that I had Apple by Chat support which was a great help... No en not knowing comment ;-) and me offering me to recall by a technician in order to take control of my computer! Waowww, the I was amazed by the efficiency :-) (the little humor)

  Someone would have had the same problem? Not with assistance but with the Organization of e-mail?

  Open Mail > Preferences > display

  Check "Message most recent show at the top.