PLS-00307: too many statements - overloaded method w. the date and time stamp

I ran in an overload situation but can't seem to find out exactly why the following error occurs:
create or replace package pkg_overload
as
  procedure overload(p_in in date);
  procedure overload(p_in in timestamp);
end pkg_overload;
/

create or replace package body pkg_overload
as
  procedure overload(p_in in date)
  as
  begin
    dbms_output.put_line('overload > date');
  end overload;

  procedure overload(p_in in timestamp)
  as
  begin
    dbms_output.put_line('overload > timestamp');
  end overload;
end pkg_overload;
/
When I run the overloaded methods sysdate and systimestamp, I get an error on the timestamp:
exec pkg_overload.overload(sysdate);

overload > date

exec pkg_overload.overload(systimestamp);

Error starting at line 27 in command:
exec pkg_overload.overload(systimestamp)
Error report:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'OVERLOAD' match this call
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
06550. 00000 -  "line %s, column %s:\n%s"
*Cause:    Usually a PL/SQL compilation error.
*Action:
It seems that Oracle is trying both the implicit conversion of the timestamp to date and no conversion, thus obtaining the error PLS-00307. Can anyone provide more insight in this? Is their still around him (in addition to creating a single method named timestamp procedure)?

Thank you

Martin
-----
http://www.talkapex.com
http://www.clarifit.com

SYSTIMESTAMP is a TIMESTAMP WITH time ZONE SCHEDULE. You must provide a separate overload for the TIMESTAMP WITH time ZONE SCHEDULE (and you'll probably want one for a setting of TIMESTAMP WITH time ZONE SCHEDULE LOCAL as well).

SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf

  1  create or replace package pkg_overload
  2  as
  3    procedure overload(p_in in date);
  4    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp);
  5    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp with time zone);
  6    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp with local time zone);
  7* end pkg_overload;
SQL> /

Package created.

SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf

  1  create or replace package body pkg_overload
  2  as
  3    procedure overload(p_in in date)
  4    as
  5    begin
  6      dbms_output.put_line('overload > date');
  7    end overload;
  8    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp)
  9    as
 10    begin
 11      dbms_output.put_line('overload > timestamp');
 12    end overload;
 13    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp with time zone)
 14    as
 15    begin
 16      dbms_output.put_line('overload > timestamp with time zone');
 17    end overload;
 18    procedure overload(p_in in timestamp with local time zone)
 19    as
 20    begin
 21      dbms_output.put_line('overload > timestamp with local time zone');
 22    end overload;
 23* end pkg_overload;
 24  /

Package body created.

SQL> set serveroutput on;

SQL> exec pkg_overload.overload( systimestamp );
overload > timestamp with time zone

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Justin

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • PLS-00307: too many statements of 'F' is this call

    Hi friends,

    I created a package (OL) using procedure overloading.

    Package specifications:

    CREATE or REPLACE package SDR_SPRUSR.ol as
    f procedure (number p);
    f procedure (p varchar2);
    f procedure (p q number, varchar2);
    f procedure (p number, q varchar2);
    f procedure (number p, q, r varchar2);
    end;
    /

    Package body:

    CREATE or REPLACE package body SDR_SPRUSR.ol as
    f procedure (number of p) is
    Start
    dbms_output.put_line ('f < number > called');
    end;

    f procedure (p varchar2) is
    Start
    dbms_output.put_line ('f < varchar > called');
    end;

    f procedure (p varchar2, number of q) is
    Start
    dbms_output.put_line ('f < varchar > called, called < number > f');
    end;

    f procedure (number, varchar2 q p) is
    Start
    dbms_output.put_line ('f < number > called, called < varchar > f');
    end;

    f procedure (p, q number, varchar2 r number) is
    Start
    dbms_output.put_line ('< number > f called < number > called f, f < varchar > called');
    end;

    end;
    /

    But here's the problem:
    When I pass NULL as a parameter like

    BEGIN
    SDR_SPRUSR. OL. F (NULL);
    END;

    I get an error in SQL * more:

    ERROR at line 3:
    ORA-06550: line 3, column 4:
    PLS-00307: too many statements of 'F' is this call
    ORA-06550: line 3, column 4:
    PL/SQL: Statement ignored

    How can I get this error? Please give me a solution...
    (My requirement is to display a friendly message when NULL is passed).

    Thank you.

    Kind regards
    Vivek

    Published by: 847837 on March 28, 2011 01:35
    Can't we display a user friendly message showing "PASS SUFFICIENT VALUES"? 
    

    Why so no change your function as follows

    procedure f (p number) is
    begin
    if p is null then
      dbms_output.put_line('f  called ==> pass sufficient values');
    end if;
    end;
    

    But even in this case you need to qualify your input parameter with to_number to_char for overload to work properly

    or give the default value for your setting if possible

    Best regards

    Mohamed Houri

  • PLS 00307 too many statement of P corresponds to this call

    I am trying to display the data with a timestamp of the values using htp.p in my package, but it makes with the above specified error

    HTP.p ("< td align =" center"> ');
    HTP.p (detrec.created);
    HTP.p ("< table > '");

    Pls suggest on this

    Thank you

    What is detrec.created? timestamp (date value)?

    Then use to_char.

       HTP.P ('');
       HTP.P (TO_CHAR ( detrec.created, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
       HTP.P ('');
    

    G.

    Published by: Ganesh aboumagahrif June 7, 2011 09:27

  • DBMS_SQL PLS-00307: too many 'PARSE' this call statements

    I'm trying to accomplish the DOF in a program, I'm here to ask you for PLSQl help since I have done very little. I get the docs of oracle plsql well. Please do it without asking the reaosn I must do this in a program.

    alter system kill session ' < sid > < serial # > ';


    sql> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE mykill(mysid IN NUMBER, myserial in number) 
      2  AS
      3      cursor_name INTEGER;
      4      rows_processed INTEGER;
      5  BEGIN
      6      cursor_name := dbms_sql.open_cursor;
      7      DBMS_SQL.PARSE(cursor_name, 'ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION '':x', ':y''',
      8                     DBMS_SQL.NATIVE);
      9      DBMS_SQL.BIND_VARIABLE(cursor_name, ':x', mysid);
     10      DBMS_SQL.BIND_VARIABLE(cursor_name,':y', myserial);
     11      rows_processed := DBMS_SQL.EXECUTE(cursor_name);
     12      DBMS_SQL.CLOSE_CURSOR(cursor_name);
     13  EXCEPTION
     14  WHEN OTHERS THEN
     15      DBMS_SQL.CLOSE_CURSOR(cursor_name);
     16  END;
     17  /
    
    Warning: Procedure created with compilation errors.
    
    sql> show error
    Errors for PROCEDURE MYKILL:
    
    LINE/COL ERROR
    -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
    7/5      PL/SQL: Statement ignored
    7/5      PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PARSE' match this call
    sql> 

    jmft2012 wrote:
    I had the following worked, it's a DML rather than the DOF.

    Yes, it is the DOF and therefore won't take a bind variable. Your code of the scrap and use of execute immediate:

    CREATE OR REPLACE
      PROCEDURE mykill(
                       mysid IN NUMBER,
                       myserial in number
                      )
        IS
        BEGIN
            EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION ''' || mysid || ',' || myserial || '''';
    END;
    /
    

    SY.

  • Default settings - too many statements

    Hello

    I have 2 procedures overloaded in package has

    P1 (param1 varchar2,
    param2 varchar2,
    param3 varchar2,
    number of param4,
    param5 varchar2)

    P1 (param1 varchar2,
    param2 varchar2,
    param3 varchar2,
    number of param4,
    param5 varchar2,
    param6 varchar2)

    Now, I add a variable with a default value to these two methods. Then, it will be like this:

    P1 (param1 varchar2,
    param2 varchar2,
    param3 varchar2,
    number of param4,
    param5 varchar2,
    number of param6: = NULL)

    P1 (param1 varchar2,
    param2 varchar2,
    param3 varchar2,
    number of param4,
    param5 varchar2,
    param6 varchar2,
    number of param7: = NULL)


    Now if I call the P1 procedure with 6 parameters, it should go to the second method. But I'm getting too many statements. I understand that 6th parameter which I use to call the method, can be the 6th for the first method too. How to troubleshoot this scenario? Even if the data type is different (the one I am passing is varchar2, but the default param in the first method is the number), I get this error message. Thanks in advance.

    What version of Oracle are you using?

    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
    
      1  create or replace package pkg_foo
      2  as
      3    procedure p1( p1 varchar2, p2_a number := null );
      4    procedure p1( p1 varchar2, p2 varchar2, p3 number := null );
      5* end;
    SQL> /
    
    Package created.
    
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
    
      1  create or replace package body pkg_foo
      2  as
      3    procedure p1( p1 varchar2, p2_a number := null )
      4    as
      5    begin
      6      p.l( 'First overload' );
      7    end;
      8    procedure p1( p1 varchar2, p2 varchar2, p3 number := null )
      9    as
     10    begin
     11      p.l( 'Second overload' );
     12    end;
     13* end;
     14  /
    
    Package body created.
    
    SQL> exec pkg_foo.p1( 'Foo', 1 );
    
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    
    SQL> set serveroutput on;
    SQL> exec pkg_foo.p1( 'Foo', 1 );
    First overload
    
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    
    SQL> exec pkg_foo.p1( 'Foo', 'Bar' );
    Second overload
    
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    
    BANNER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    

    Justin

  • overloading a DATE with time STAMP function to avoid the "too many declarations.

    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE util
    AS
      FUNCTION yn (bool IN BOOLEAN)
        RETURN CHAR;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a varchar2, b varchar2)
        RETURN BOOLEAN;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a date, b date)
        RETURN BOOLEAN;
    
      /* Oracle's documentation says that you cannot overload subprograms
       * that have the same type family for the arguments.  But, 
       * apparently timestamp and date are in different type families,
       * even though Oracle's documentation says they are in the same one.
       * If we don't create a specific overloaded function for timestamp,
       * and for timestamp with time zone, we get "too many declarations 
       * of is_same match" when we try to call is_same for timestamps.
       */
      FUNCTION is_same(a timestamp, b timestamp)
        RETURN BOOLEAN;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a timestamp with time zone, b timestamp with time zone)
        RETURN BOOLEAN;
    
      /* These two do indeed cause problems, although there are no errors when we compile the package.  Why no errors here? */
      FUNCTION is_same(a integer, b integer) return boolean;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a real, b real) return boolean;
    
    END util;
    /
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY util
    AS
      /********************************************************************************
         NAME: yn
         PURPOSE: pass in a boolean, get back a Y or N
      ********************************************************************************/
      FUNCTION yn (bool IN BOOLEAN)
        RETURN CHAR
      IS
      BEGIN
        IF bool
        THEN
          RETURN 'Y';
        END IF;
    
        RETURN 'N';
      END yn;
    
      /********************************************************************************
         NAME: is_same
         PURPOSE: pass in two values, get back a boolean indicating whether they are
                  the same.  Two nulls = true with this function.
      ********************************************************************************/
      FUNCTION is_same(a in varchar2, b in varchar2)
        RETURN BOOLEAN
      IS
        bool boolean := false;
      BEGIN
        IF a IS NULL and b IS NULL THEN bool := true;
        -- explicitly set this to false if exactly one arg is null
        ELSIF a is NULL or b IS NULL then bool := false;
        ELSE bool := a = b;
        END IF;
        RETURN bool;
      END is_same;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a in date, b in date)
        RETURN BOOLEAN
      IS
        bool boolean := false;
      BEGIN
        IF a IS NULL and b IS NULL THEN bool := true;
        -- explicitly set this to false if exactly one arg is null
        ELSIF a is NULL or b IS NULL then bool := false;
        ELSE bool := a = b;
        END IF;
        RETURN bool;
      END is_same;
      
      FUNCTION is_same(a in timestamp, b in timestamp)
        RETURN BOOLEAN
      IS
        bool boolean := false;
      BEGIN
        IF a IS NULL and b IS NULL THEN bool := true;
        -- explicitly set this to false if exactly one arg is null
        ELSIF a is NULL or b IS NULL then bool := false;
        ELSE bool := a = b;
        END IF;
        RETURN bool;
      END is_same;
    
      FUNCTION is_same(a in timestamp with time zone, b in timestamp with time zone)
        RETURN BOOLEAN
      IS
        bool boolean := false;
      BEGIN
        IF a IS NULL and b IS NULL THEN bool := true;
        -- explicitly set this to false if exactly one arg is null
        ELSIF a is NULL or b IS NULL then bool := false;
        ELSE bool := a = b;
        END IF;
        RETURN bool;
      END is_same;
    
      /* Don't bother to fully implement these two, as they'll just cause errors at run time anyway */
      FUNCTION is_same(a integer, b integer) return boolean is begin return false; end;
      FUNCTION is_same(a real, b real) return boolean is begin return false; end;
      
    END util;
    /
    
    declare
     d1 date := timestamp '2011-02-15 13:14:15';
     d2 date;
     t timestamp := timestamp '2011-02-15 13:14:15';
     t2 timestamp;
     a varchar2(10);
     n real := 1;
     n2 real;
    begin
     dbms_output.put_line('dates');
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(d2,d2) ));
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(d1,d2) ));
     dbms_output.put_line('timestamps'); -- why don't these throw exception?
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(t2,t2) ));
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(t,t2) ));
     dbms_output.put_line('varchars');
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(a,a)));
     dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(a,'a')));
     dbms_output.put_line('numbers');
     -- dbms_output.put_line(util.yn(util.is_same(n,n2))); -- this would throw an exception
    end;
    /
    Originally, I had just the a function with the arguments of VARCHAR2. It worked not correctly because when the dates were gone, the automatic conversion into VARCHAR2 lowered the timestamp. So, I added a 2nd function with the arguments to DATE. Then I started to get "too many declarations of is_same exist" error during the passage of time stamps. This made no sense to me, so, although documentation Oracle says you can't do this, I created a 3rd version of the function, to manage the TIMESTAMPS explicitly. Surprisingly, it works fine. But then I noticed that he did not work with TIMESTAMP with time zones. Therefore, the fourth version of the function. Docs of the Oracle say that if your arguments are of the same family, you can't create an overloaded function, but in the example above shows, it's very bad.

    Finally, just for grins, I created the functions of number two, one number, the other with REAL and even these are allowed - they are compiled. But then, at runtime, it fails. I'm really confused.

    Here's the apparently erroneous Oracle documentation on this subject: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B12037_01/appdev.101/b10807/08_subs.htm (see overload subprogram names) and here are the different types and their families: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e17126/predefined.htm.

    Published by: hot water on 9 January 2013 15:38

    Published by: hot water on 9 January 2013 15:46

    >
    So, I added a 2nd function with the arguments to DATE. Then I started to get "too many declarations of is_same exist" error during the passage of time stamps. It makes no sense for me
    >
    This is because when you pass a TIMESTAMP Oracle cannot determine whether to implicitly convert to VARCHAR2 and use your first function or implicitly convert to DATE and use your second function. Where the "too many declarations" error exist.
    >
    , even if said Oracle documentation you can not do, so I created a 3rd version of the function to manage the TIMESTAMPS explicitly. Surprisingly, it works fine. But then I noticed that he did not work with TIMESTAMP with time zones.
    >
    Perhaps due to another error "too many declarations? Because now, there will be THREE possible implicit conversions that might be made.
    >
    Therefore, the fourth version of the function. Docs of the Oracle say that if your arguments are of the same family, you can't create an overloaded function, but in the example above shows, it's very bad.
    >
    I think that the documentation, of the family of 'date', is wrong as you suggest. For WHOLE and REAL, the problem is that those are the ANSI data types and are really the same Oracle data type; they are more like "alias" that different data types.

    See the doc of SQL language
    >
    ANSI SQL/DS and DB2 data types

    The SQL statements that create tables and clusters allows also ANSI data types and products IBM SQL/DS and DB2 data types. Oracle recognizes the ANSI or IBM data type name that differs from the Oracle database data type name. It converts the data type for the equivalent Oracle data type, stores the Oracle data type under the name of the column data type and stores the data in the column in the data type Oracle based on the conversions listed in the following tables.

    INTEGER NUMBER

    INT

    SMALLINT
    NUMBER (38)

    FLOAT (Note b)

    DOUBLE-PRECISION (Note c)

    REAL (Note d)
    FLOAT (126)

    FLOAT (126)

    FLOAT (63)

  • Too many statements of "SET_REPORT_OBJECT_PROPERTY" corresponds to this call

    Hi guys,.

    I'm writing a program unit that will accept the file name of the report to run and try to set the report object filename runtime as follows:-


    PROCEDURE RUN_PRODUCT_PROC(report_filename VARCHAR2) IS
    Start
    SET_REPORT_OBJECT_PROPERTY (REPORT_ID, REPORT_FILENAME, report_filename);

    -run reports
    report_message: = run_report_object (report_id, report_param_list);

    end;

    But when I try to compile this unit then it gives me error-
    307 error at line 45,
    too many statements of "SET_REPORT_OBJECT_PROPERTY" corresponds to this call

    Can help any one on this?

    AV.

    Where is my reward useful/correct ;)

  • Pulling in too many sheets when printing to the printer.

    I have an Officejet 7310, which pulls in too many sheets of paper when it prints. This seems to be the case with all types of 8.5 "x 11". Any ideas? Thank you!

    What is the weight of the paper

    If you use 20 lbs

    try the 24lbs

    Also check the properties of the printer of somewhere the on this box or

    It's in the preferences

  • Too many States are bad?

    I think to implement a large number of States, more than 100.  Do all the components included in each State stay loaded in memory?  Or they get allowed out of memory when a State is not active?

    Thank you.

    Yes very bad and difficult to manage. Try some of the properties of your component binding to toggle data parameters you don't need to put in some States.

  • Too many items to menu in the application will result in failure project packaging

    Hi all

    I have a problem in my application when the number of the menu in the application items exceeded a certain number of the packaging project fails.

    When I tried to the bottling of the project in eclipse, an error message was the result:

    I/o Error: Cannot run program "jar": CreateProcess = 2 error, the system cannot find the file specified
    Packaging project Myproject failed (taken 6,391 seconds)

    But when I remove one menu item package succeeded.

    What could be wrong.

    Thanks in advance.

    Thank God,

    I found the solution:

    I'm not sure but I think becaue I use (Blackberry JRE 5) so I need JDK 6 more to update 20.

    But what makes issue resolved that:

    I installed (JDK 6 update 21) and put the path to the bin folder in environment variables.

    Here is the link to download (JDK 6 update 21):

    http://download.Java.NET/jdk6/6u21/promoted/b05/binaries/JDK-6u21-EA-bin-b05-Windows-i586-29_may_201...

    To add the environment variable:

    Right click on my computer > properties > advanced > environment variables:

    system variables:

    Double click PATH, and then add the path to the bin folder (can be like this: "C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_21\bin")

    I hope this will help one.

  • Too many files are returned by the search

    I have thousands of files I need to travel from time to time for specific identification numbers.  The numbers are in the format "00-00-00 '.  When I do a search for content of file using Windows Explorer, I continue to receive files with even part of the search string.  I went into the folder options and not them 'find partial matches' and ' language search natural use "options, but I always get a hundred of files returned, do the wasted effort.  I tried to enter the string search with and without quotes, but it seems to make no difference.  My question is 1) is there something special I have to do because the research focuses on numbers and 2) so I have a result of unacceptable research, so I have to delete the Index or something to not keep the same result?

    Try this special syntax:

    content: ~ = "00-00-00 '.

    Use the name: ~ = "00-00-00' if it's parts of file names that you are looking.

    The symbol of the hyphen, as symbols of most special is not available without the use of syntax as ~ =, which means "corresponds to anywhere."

    [Update: apparently special search symbols such as ~ = do not work with the content when property indexed research places, but work during the search in unindexed locations.]

  • Too many slashes in DW 4 the old code, the new code is good to DW MX

    Hi all

    I've been on this forum for Adobe Premiere and Adobe After Effects, but it's my first time for Dreamweaver.

    I am currently using Dreamweaver MX 2004 on Windows 8.1.

    I have an old site, I did that I am the resurrection, it is archived on a CD, and the last time it was online in 2008.  College-simile of the HTML pages in the beginning, I created in Dreamweaver 4 between 2000 and 2005, and the new pages were created in 2006 and 2007 in Dreamweaver MX and in 2008, pages worked and display correctly in what were then current versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox.

    But now, in Google Chrome (last updated) and Internet Explorer 11, more older pages that I created in Dreamweaver 4 have a slash at the beginning of each image and each name link in the page code, and all the slashes make it bit so none of the pictures appear and none of the links work in the current version of Google Chrome and IE 11 , but the pages that I created in 2007 in Dreamweaver MX, everything works fine in modern browsers, because the code in these pages does not have a slash before the name of each image and each link name.

    Examples...   ' / imagename.jpg " against "imagename.jpg" or " / nextpage.html " from "nextpage.html"

    From what I understand, older browsers to tolerate these stray oblique at the beginning of each image name and the beginning of each link name in the HTML code of the page, and these older browsers would display images and links work on a Web page or not those extra reduced forward were in code.

    But apparently the most recent browsers Google Chrome and IE 11 will not tolerate these oblique extra, and so these Web pages of mine created in Dreamweaver 4 especially vacuum display in browsers... I did not yet any test in Firefox or the new versions of all other browsers.

    So MY QUESTION IS... is it possible in Dreamweaver MX to quickly remove all the obliques that appear at first the name of the image and at the beginning of every link in the code names, without deleting all others forward slashed.

    Do this manually or with "Find and replace" in the code is not an option... most of these pages slices or with large sections of slices and a large number of links on every page so edition manual is not a solution for this problem.

    I tried variations of the command, "Clean up HTML" in Dreamweaver MX, but that did nothing.

    Thanks for any input.

    Digi

    If I had to change the links to my pictures, I use find and Replace dialog as follows

    I do this because I know what I'm doing and know that the action cannot be reversed once started.

    This is the reason why Murray asked for a link to your site so that it can give you a solution tailored to your problem.

  • Too many clicks on any of the PPT Slides

    Hello

    I'm having a problem when you import PowerPoint slides in Captivate 5 (from PowerPoint 2003). Most of the slides are importing animations, transitions and text very well. However, a few slides have a problem with the number of clicks needed.

    On these blades instead of the user having to click once to see the first line of text, image, etc, click around five times before everything is displayed. Whenever the user clicks on, the playback in the .swf skin indicator momentarily changes to pause, indicating it is playing and then returns to play. This shows that the clicks are recording and the timeline progresses, but nothing happens.

    The original PowerPoint files do not require these extra clicks.

    I added navigation buttons to each slide, but I put to not pause playback until the user clicks. I also have a box to click on 'continue' final on the slides that has been added by Captivate during the import. These work on 90% of the slides, but not issues.

    I had the same problem with a .flv video embedded. As a slide with the inserted video, it stops at about four different stages will fade before it has been made clear and video could be played correctly. I disabled the transition between slides (no longer discolor or fade in and out) and this fixed the problem with the video. Unfortunately turning off transitions has not worked with these other slides.

    I guess there is something in my editing that is causing this problem, but I don't see what it is. If anyone has any ideas I would like some advice,

    Thank you.

    I found a reasonable solution to this issue. It seems to be related to the PowerPoint slide. The problem arises when I delete the slide from the slide layout, and then it is imported into Captivate.

    To resolve this problem, I'll be back in the PowerPoint slide show and apply the layout of slide. I can update the blade as necessary and even leave a text box empty if necessary.

  • ORA-02045: too many local sessions involved in the overall transaction

    Hello
    It has to do with the solution I got from my previous in post

    change the column using the trigger

    This solution works in my local scheme. But when this test in the real application.
    I got above error.

    may I know what is the reason?

    Thank you

    You are most welcome ;)

  • I'm watching a commercial Web site in the United States (I'm in the Canada) and I'm getting blocked by something called SONICWALL - how can I get rid of this?

    What is SONICWALL & how can I stop it blocking my attempts to access a Web site?

    Hello

    What is the site?

    Check with the support of SonicWall

    SonicWall
    http://www.SonicWALL.com/

    I hope this helps.

    Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle=""><- mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

Maybe you are looking for