PPCC2015 actually ADDING noise to the export.

Similar Questions

• Adding a RAID card to help speed up the export (and another question reader) in first Pro CC

  First of all, I read the Page Tweakers export section because that is my main concern is. First my questions, then the background and my current and proposed configurations:

  Question 1: Adding a hardware RAID controller, for example an LSI MegaRAID will sufficiently remove the burden of parity management CPU on my RAID 5 software that the CPU will jump of joy and export faster?

  Question 2: If true for above, then compare thoughts on adding smaller SSD for either a RAID 0 or less two RAID 0 volume volume complete HDD RAID 5. In other words, I think the purchase of four Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB SSD to put in a four disk volume to handle everything (projects/media, media, previews, export cache), or split it into two volumes of two disks of each and divide the tasks, or keep the idea of volume four disc and previews and exports on my drive HARD RAID 5 array.

  The 850 are valued at SEQ write: 550 / 470 MB/s so I could get around 2000 / 1500 MB/s read/write to a disk four RAID 0 or 1/2 who, if I divided in two volumes to minimize the volume of read/write at the same time, if it really matters with these SSD?

  The Tweaker page made some comments. A split is carried out the tasks between different drives, rather than a large effective RAID can really slow things down. Because SSDS are much faster than a single HARD disk, I think its more accurate than so I'm leaning towards the configuration of four discs put OS & programs on the C drive, media & projects on media on SSD (2 disks RAID 0) Cache and D (HDD RAID 5), file exchange & Previews & export on 2nd SSD RAID 0 (or combine the two RAID 0 and their functions).

  Just trying to get a point of view here, since I have not bought anything yet. Any experience/stories, I would be grateful.

  My current setup of training:

  My D drive is a software RAID 5 consisting of four 1 TB Western Digital RE4 (RED) 7200 RPM hard drives with CrystalDiskMark SEQ read/write of 339 / 252 MB/s.

  The C drive is 500 GB SSD (Samsung 840 (not Pro) and fact 531 / 330 MB/s.) My OS, Program Files and Page file are on C and media data/files/projects, etc. that are all about the RAID drive.

  Problem:

  Current configuration allows for smooth installation, just export seems slow, usually taking between two and two and a half times the video length to export. Thus, a 10 minute video takes 20-30 minutes for export. 15 minute video can take 30-40 minutes to export. The first 10% of the export of re-encoding takes less than a minute (seems fast), but it becomes slower when the final 10 or 20 percent may hang for several minutes as my system is running out of steam. So, where's the waste?

  I activated the hardware acceleration (because the GPU hack my GPU is not listed) and it can break through to 25% use a few times and eat up to 600 MB of VRAM (I have 2 GB of VRAM), otherwise it is slowed down export set. The CPU can boost at 50%, but it seems either too busy.

  Our calendar is simple with two video and two audio streams (a little music and especially the voices), with simple transitions (jump cuts or cross dissolves). Sometimes, we fast correct color, so that could use the GPU? Also, given that we are filming in 1080 P 60 p and 1080 export 29.97 FPS, I think who is scaling and using the GPU. I know that without the GPU, it takes much longer. I excluded buy a faster GPU because it doesn't seem to be breaking a sweat. I just need to know if my system is a bottleneck at the level of the disk hard because I am using software RAID and my disks are slow and hardware RAID will considerably reduce the processor load so it can export more quickly.

  Our files are not huge in nature. Most of our clips are several MBs each. Total files in the project are between 5 GB and 10 GB for each video with Windows Media File export being 500 MB to 1.2 GB on average. Look using Panasonic Camcorders, so the original files are AVCHD, I think (.) MTS files?).

  Considerations:

  1. I think to buy (and future proofing) a LSI Logic MegaRAID 9361-8i is 12 Gb/s SAS and SATA (because some SSD current can exceed the standard 6 Gbps).

  2. I will not replace my current HDD RAID 5 as not in my budget to spend 6 or more large SSD. These discs are more important to me for temporary storage because I delete files saved once. I don't mind a few smaller SSD inexpensive if they can make a significant difference for editing and export.

  I can only guess my RAID HDD is slow but the CPU is burdened by parity. I guess running RAID 10 would not really help.

  My configuration:

  my configuration:

  CPU - CPU i7 - 3930K @4.5 GHz

  RAM - G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32 GB (4 x 8 GB) DDR3 2133 @2000

  Motherboard - ASUS P9X79 WS LGA 2011

  GPU - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 OC 2 GB (performed the hack of compatibility list to activate hardware acceleration).

  Drive C - 500 GB Samsung SSD (programs and Windows 7 Pro 64-bit) 840.

  D drive - four 1 TB WD RE4 enterprise hard drives 7200 rpm in RAID 5 software

  Box - Cooler Master HAF X

  CPU fan - Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO with 120 mm fan

  Power - series Pro Corsair AX 850 watts 80 Plus Gold

  Optical drive - Pioneer BDR - 208DBK

  Thanks in advance,

  Eric

  OK, after overload of information on everything I tried (free), which might be my answer here. I went from codecs to export. When you use Windows Media File, Premiere Pro seems chugging along much slower than when you use the h.264 (not h.264 Blu - Ray). I don't know if it's because Microsoft has found a way to break it or what. But I'm the CPU usage of 70-85% on the 2 Pass of 2 as well as the use of the memory of 40% (or 12 GB). It exported in 14 minutes. Woo - hoo. I then did a similar test using Windows Media File. It took 31 minutes to export. The CPU has spent much of his time in the 30%, especially down in the 1930s mid-1940s with spike for memory usage was only 24% to 35% and 50%. Since then, I've read how h.264 codec is 'plu' for online files. It compresses better with less compression artifacts. He seems better, etc. Well, they both seemed on the same thing for me. I play both on my TV 70 "before I could comment further. In the future, I will consider a RAID controller and upgrade the HDDs to SSDS.

• Preset and actual resolution to the export of the project

  I'm PE11 video edition.

  Source of GoPro's 1080@60. He has not preset in PE for this resolution and framerate so I chose a preset with AVCHD squarepixel 720p@60 by mistake. Couple days of editing before I realized that it, and from what I see, I can not change the resolution of project now...

  So the question is:

  If the original file is 1080 p, the project preset is 720 p and I export it with setting 1080 p - did I lose this quality/resolution? I mean, DON'T downsample my 720 p video and then change again to 1080 p? Who would lose quality result. Like trying to save 480 p 720 p etc. ?

  Or maybe, it's just internal preset for the purporse only edition and in the end, I get my files original 1080 p?

  IF IT ISN'T... Can I somehow copy my work on the new project defined as fullhd?

  faziasty

  Thanks for the reply.

  Let me clarify the 3rd of the 3 for what I believe to be your choice for this project under the above circumstances.

  Major circumstances... that's what you now... you set a project 720 p 60 preset for your project 1080 p 60, made your changes, cannot go back to set the parameters of the correct project (1080 p 60) unless you open a new project and start from the beginning. If you have more files 1080 p 60 to add to this project, fine. If this is not the case, head for the export of this timeline to 1080 p 60 content using the workflow details I already posted. I mean that the result will not be as bad as you seem to be projecting. This seems to be the only choice in the circumstances to save this project.

  Thanks for the details on your question on why export same size of file for your 720 p and 1080 p.

  According to the description of how you made the comparison, the same or comparable file size would be expected for these exports.

  Consider that each will have the same bitrate (32 Mbit/s) and duration of 9 seconds.

  32 MB/s (megabits per second) x 9 seconds = 288 megabits

  If we convert these 288 megabits in KB (kilobytes per second), we get 36000 KB (kilobytes) like the estimated file size.

  Compare my calculations with what you have observed in fact

  720 p file, 35649 KB

  1080 p file, 35659 KB

  Please consider.

  Looking forward to your results according to your schedule.

  RTA

• Error adding audio to the accordion Widget

  I am trying to use the Accordion widget that ships with Adobe Captivate 7. In the properties of the Widget, you can add audio to the description under each tab. When I go to select a narrated audio file (which has been recorded using Adobe Captivate) in the library, I get this error message indicating that I "chose the type of wrong file...» ». If someone has encountered this? What other types of audio file can be added?

  

  Hello

  While I have not seen the exact behavior you describe, audio did not for me on this gadget until I did the following steps.

  1. export the audio library. Mp3 format.

  2. starting at the widget when adding audio, choose the import option and direct to MP3.

  I tried export from the library in WAV format and actually saw the message you have described. But by following the above steps it worked for me.

  See you soon... Rick

• NOON adding loops to the loop browser

  I recently bought a few loops Loops the Looploft and Platinum. Some were the rest of MIDI and audio. Audio loops added very well. LUNCH will however not appear in the loop browser when adding. Is there a procedure I need to follow? I've just them slipped into the loop browser in the folder I copied in my home folder. Logic has done its thing spinning for a while, but never added loops.

  (1) Midi Apple Loops (green) are not the same as plain old loops Midi... so adding plain loops Midi for the Apple loop browser will not work... and therefore will not show in the loop browser. Regular midi loops can be simply dragged into the window Finder arrangement or the logic file browser.

  (2) to create an Apple Midi loop... (Green type) so you can add it in the loop browser... You must create a noon... with software instrument region etc... Select that region and then right or command to the left... click it to bring up the context menu and choose export > add to the loop library and fill in the relevant details in the next dialog box...

  Note: Can not find the export function? Turn on ALL the advanced tools in the preferences of Logic...

• IMac 27, making a strange noise in the rear lower left

  A few days ago that my Imac is strange a hum, which last usually 1 or 2 hours after I turn it on, then abruptly stopped. I tried all these things without permanent result:

  1 reset the SMC

  2 reset the PRAM and NVRAM

  3. clean the vents

  4. store any electrical device that might make the interference.

  My iMac details

  (27-inch, late 2012)

  2.9 GHz Intel Core i5 processor

  8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Thanks in advance!

  LuchoAGV,

  IMac 27 inches, model 2012 late has some elements that could make a noise in the section at the bottom left of the material.  Your steps so far have helped to understand what is happening!  There are a set of speaker on the lower left side of the computer, but also a hard drive Assembly.  Don't forget to back up your information as soon as possible in which case it is the last. If the problem persists when starting Internet recovery (computer turn off power then back on holding Cmd + Option + R), you can confirm that it is actually a hardware problem and will have to bring the service unit.

  You can perform a test of material using this article: using Apple Hardware Test - Apple Support

  * Note * the hardware test does not include if there is a hardware failure.

• 6035-E high frequency noise reduces the resolution of 14 bits.

  Dear Technical Support Group OR and MF DAQ,

  I don't get the complete 16-bit on my DAQ 6035 - E cards and 6034-E resolution because of the high frequency noise.
  The Test Panel and the actual catches show 1.2 mV peak-to-peak noise with entries is is failed the GA right input in differential ended mode and single connector - Test Panel screen grab and connector attached picture.
  With a range of +-10V, noise LSB + half expected specified in the manual should be only 305 microvolts (20/65536) which is four times less than what I see.
  So far, I've been scanning (a channel) to ten times (60 KHz) the rate I need (6 KHz), then SavGol the filtering and sampling downstairs.
  The problem is that I need to sweep the four channels that now exceeds the capacity of 200 KHz of the card and also results in huge quantities of useless data.

  Have considered buying a new USB DAQ with better record, I fear that all products OR suffer the same flaws and gave the purchase.

  Please, share your ideas.

  Thank you.

  GPSman salvation,

  Looking at your control panel test plot, it would seem that there is a discrete steps on your axis is between - 0.0019 and - 0.0012 or 700 µV.  Then you can see that there is about a little more than 2 discrete steps to your signal, which brings value to about 300 microvolts, exactly as the resolution makes clear.

  You can also find that there is a specification of noise and precision in specification.  You can find for a single point, the accuracy in the +/-10V between 1,085 millivolt.  This is on page 4.  This would allow your signal of +/-1 mV of the expected value, the test also indicating panels.

  Does that help?

  best,

• Problems with the export of

  Hello

  I had problems with the export feature in Photoshop 2015 CC. I think that the problems started some time around the most recent update, but it is possible it all started when I used the photo frame Script (filter > render > photo frame). I'm not sure. But as you'll see below, it is almost that the software attempts to create a setting when I try to export an image.

  In any case, when I try to use the export function, the image that appears in the dialog box is stretched and distorted.

  

  I can resize the box and the image will then appear normal, but then when I click on "Export all", the screen looks like this:

  

  The box save never actually appears. It's just a white box with a black column. It's almost as if the screen is not complete the drawing.

  And it seems that this problem starts even before I got to export in the form box. The beginning of Photoshop screen looks like this:

  

  The file names (which I have gray here) are not complete. They end up just with a white line that reaches out to the right of the screen.

  This has happened for at least a few weeks now. Stop smoking out and restarting does not help. I tried to reset my preferences and that did not help. I tried to delete the preferences file and it still happens.

  BTW, the Save for Web feature works very well.

  I work on a Mac with the following attributes:

  

  My Mac software is up to date, as well as Photoshop.

  Can someone help me understand what is happening and how to fix it?

  Thank you-

  Mary

  If you see a picture frame in the preview, but not in the exported file, I think that you have driver video card problems.

  If you go into Photoshop preferences > Performance and uncheck 'Use Graphics Processor', the problem goes away?

• Removal of the exported files

  If I change a photo into lr then export to desktop, send to where I want, then remove countertop, I'll still be able to edit in lr or is it gone?

  Thank you

  One, exported image is a separate file. To export the means to make a copy of the original file with usually a file Extension different, JPG or TIF instead of extending RAW file and at the same time, apply the changes, you did so that the exported image. LR is not really the original images. The changes you make on images in LR are saved in the catalog file or XMP file, or in the case of DNG, TIF or JPG the changes are actually stored in the original file in a special area that does not alter the original image. The only time you can see the changes made by LR is when you view the image within LR and or when you export an image. Then the changes applied to the exported image.

  So in answer to your last question.

  If you change an image and then export this image on the desktop, and then decide to delete the image you exported to your desktop remains the original images, and Yes you could / can still see in LR and make edits more on it or remove and or modify the changes you had made previously in this topic.

  Please review some of the very good tutorial available LR on the NET, and perhaps even buying a book on LR.

• Display the export value of the drop-down list instead of the element

  I'm showing the value to the export of a drop-down list instead of the selected option or the user selects BLACK, but the value of exports of BLK is actually displayed.  I can find many discussions on how to get the value of the exports and display it or use it to trigger another answer in another area and I can usually tweak my existing JavaScripts when I need something new, but I just can't wrap my head around this!

  This is my last attempt (failed)

  var f = this.getField ("eyes");

  If (event.value is 'Black - BLK')

  f.Value = "BLK".

  I use Acrobat PRO DC.

  Any help is appreciated,

  Thank you

  Xavier

  
  

  I've been doing this for a long time and have never heard of anyone who wants something like this, so it is interesting. Remove your current script and try the following script Format customized drop eyes:

  Custom drop-down list Format script

  Event.Value = event.target.getItemAt (event.target.currentValueIndices, true);

  This defines what is displayed in the drop-down list in the value of exports of the selected item. Select the 'Value selected to validate immediately' option to the drop-down list for smoother operation.

• Why the font size is so great when adding text to the photo in high resolution?

  Why the font size is so great when adding text to the photo in high resolution?

  Font size is usually determined by the size in points. 72 points equal to 1 inch. the size is independent of the size of your actual file. You might have a file that is located at 72 dpi, which is set to a 5 X 7 "and the police would be the size even if it is a 1200 dpi image 5 X 7.

  

• PNG sequence for the Export movie anime characters

  Hello

  I'm having a problem doing my video animate when export to Flash Professional CS6. When I select file > export > export movie... and then select PNG sequence, it records the full video in the form of PNG files, as requested. Unfortunately, it does not animate the characters, resulting in the feet and the head is animation not at all. In other words, it looks like the preview mode that Flash gives you when you animate. (probably same thing happens for GIF and JPG as well) Anyone know how to get this animation correctly?

  BTW, the reason that we export a PNG sequence is because the export as an actually desperately blurry video, so if anyone knows how to export without compression, crisp animations let me know and I can skip the step above.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Brian

  Well, I woke up today and the solution was in my head. As usual, I did something stupid. I export the video to 320 x 200, because it was the resolution of the Amiga computer that I do this art of the bitmap in tribute to. For some reason, leading his blurry, even if the pixels themselves should adapt very well in 320 x 200. Instead, I exported in 1280 x 800, and now the pixels look crisp. Such a solution easy, so much lost time...

  Thank you for all your help. If someone here knew I was exporting to this size it probably would have been resolved quite quickly.

• Missing data value on the export

  I use FDM v11.1.2.2, and I get an error during the export step. The message export shows that there is no value for the record. I put the data value for the location as < entity currency >, and I don't know why the dimension value is missing from the dat file that is produced. The adapter is FM11X-G6-A. I don't have any scripts in the application.
  
  Anyone seen this before?
  
  
  Range: 2, error: cell invalid for the period Jan.
  Actual; 2012; Jan; YTD; 2891_DIVN; FFS; [ICP no]; [None]; OM; LOAD;-182.49
  > > > > > >
  
  
  Error message in the error log
  * FdmFM11XG6A Runtime Error Log entry to start [2013-23 / 01/11: 54:06] *.
  -------------------------------------------------------------
  Error:
  Code of... 10002
  Description... Data loading errors.
  Process... clsHPDataManipulation.fDBLoad
  Component... C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\products\FinancialDataQuality\SharedComponents\FM11X-G6-A_1016\AdapterComponents\fdmFM11XG6A\fdmFM11XG6A.dll
  Version... 1116
  
  Identification:
  ... The user xxxxxxxx
  Name of the computer... XXXXXXXX
  
  Connection of FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:
  Name of the application...
  Name of the cluster...
  Field...
  Connect status... Open connection

  Check the .dat itself and see if the value is there. There is a bug where the user HFM error log does not display the data value. The .dat should be printing If it is defined in the location. If it is printed in the .dat, the line can be an invalid intersection.

• How to get help with conversion ROCK on the export of PDF?

  How can I get help with the quality of the PDF documents converted to word format export.

  Not likely to have, you're doing a "happy dance" but a scanned image is "the ear of the sow" and (Yes, I'll say).

  You can't have a scholarship of silk in one ear of the sow.

  Make you a picture of the text content. You get a result of OCR of all that is recognized. The character by character recognition accuracy is generally quite good. But - No image/photo file actually holds information on format, layout, fonts, etc. - it's just a picture. Acrobat OCR makes some assumptions about all this.

  -You have a bunch of each of the characters being exported to Word. Individual characters, not paragraphs, sentences no, no words, no values "white space", etc.

  So you get an export that is a "best estimate" of the less desirable source. Sometimes, it isn't so bad. Sometimes it's just awful. In all cases, you will need to do some cleanup of the exported content that landed in the Word file.

  The alternative is to transcribe the hardcopy to the Word file.
  In fact it can often be higher as a workflow rather than the scanning-ocr-export-cleanup shuffle

  .

  For really nice export "spot - we ', you must start with a PDF file from an application of creation (not a scanned image) which is a well-formed tag PDF (for example ISO 14289-1, PDF/UA-1).
  The purpose of the tagged PDF document is not only Accessible PDF is also how PDF supports actively the re-use of content (for example, export).

  Be well...

• Dimensions of the exported PDF

  Thanks to anyone who can help me with this.

  I designed a standard header 8.5 "x 11" (actually 10.98 "per the specifications of the printer) in InDesign.

  When I export to PDF, bridge shows the dimensions of the document to be 648 x 827, which leads me to think the file exported to 72 dpi.

  The printer's specifications indicate 2551 x 3295 must be file format.

  I feel I'm missing something basic but have no chance of research here and not elsewhere online.

  Any help/advice would be most appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Patrick

  A PDF without a resolution. Open it in Acrobat to check the dimensions.

  Bob