Prevent the user from interacting with the control

I have a plan I want to "lock".  I don't want the user to be able to zoom or scroll the map at all, I tried touchEvents ignorant, but who has not worked for me.

Any thoughts?

In this case, I would usually throw in an "overlay" object, so it appears above the element in question (a simple way is to use a DockLayout and make sure the second element is defined after the first element, resulting in a higher position in the Z-order) in layers. The purpose of recovery would intercept activities of users and basically throw it out.

According to the provision in question, however, it is probably easier to use the touchPropagationMode property VisualNode: https://developer.blackberry.com/native/reference/cascades/bb__cascades__visualnode.html#property-to... on the article in question, or its parent.

Tags: BlackBerry Developers

Similar Questions

  • Prevent a user from changing the ID of project in P6 EPPM 8.3.7

    Anyone know if there is a Global privilege or project security profile that prevents a user from changing the project on an existing project ID?  We use Primavera P6 EPPM 8.3.7

    Thank you

    Eric

    Hello

    Security of the project profile below can help you

    Change the details of the project with the exception of costs / Financials

    Determines if the profile will allow users to modify fields in general tabs, Dates, default values, resources, and settings of the project details. To assign a project of baselines, users must also have the privilege of project 'assign the planning of project"assigned to their profile.

    Kind regards

    Marcos

  • Prevent a user from changing

    Hello

    : Is thr possible to prevent a user to perform the DML operation

    Hello

    LOCK TABLE tablename in EXCLUSIVE MODE;

    We can use this to prevent a user from some time handling

    If you want that the user don't not to access permanently to revoke the privileges of this user.

  • Prevent some users from connecting

    Is there an easy way to prevent users from my LDAP directory with a special connection to the CMC role? Or would need a custom for this component?

    If this is not the case, is it possible that I can remove the role 'authenticated' of these users? I looked at maps of credentials, but does not know how to remove a role with a card.

    "authenticated" by itself really means little, this role does not have the permissions set in COE out of the box.  By default, users are granted the role of "guest", who has read access to the security group 'Public '.  Remove this 'guest' read permission would allow a connection, but no access to anything other than an error page.  Simply connected usually isn't a problem, it is usually more what a user can access once logged.  This is where a user roles has become important.

    In my opinion, the simplest method is to set the provider LDAP to examine a certain OU to its users and include only users in this ORGANIZATIONAL unit that will use COE.  This suggestion is based on the information at hand.  If you use the portal, SOA, etc. in the same domain, this approach is perhaps not possible

  • How to prevent a user from opening multiple instances on the same computer?

    On site oldnavyweekly.com , there is a .swf which prevents users to open multiple instances of the site at the same time on the same computer. If you open the site and try to open it again in another window, it will not load. Cannot open the site again until the first window is closed. How did they implement this?

    My analysis, that is NOT:
    1. cookies - the block always takes place if you try to open it in Internet Explorer and also try to open it in Firefox at the same time.
    2 flash Cookies - the block always takes place if I disable flash cookies.
    3 IP Based Block - you are not blocked if you open the site on two separate computers with the same outgoing IP address. From my analysis, their server does not help in the block at all.

    It seems as if their .swf creates a sort of object throughout the global system which can be detected in other instances of the application on the same computer. How did they implement this?

    Thank you!

    use localconnection.  everyone has a localconnection to send and a receiving localconnection.  the lc reception closes the current application.

  • the user can interact with db directly using obiee dashboard dynamically

    Hai,

    can any user interacts directly with the database and can store data using the OBIEE dashboard? in the affirmative, please let me know that.

    It's very urgent.
    Thanks in advance...

    You have a problem with your date format

    UPDATE DASH_ALERT_MSG set DATE_UPDATION='7/28/2008' WHERE DASHBOARD_NAME='Media'
    

    See this article for how to manage date format (and don't care about the Casting information):
    http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/OBIEE/logical_sql/obiee_cast_as_date

    One solution is to change your NLS_DATE_FORMAT:

    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT = 'MM/DD/YYYY/'
    

    but you can choose to change the date format OBIEE to match the format of database.

    See you soon
    Nico

  • Any creative ways to prevent some users from always using the console?

    Our Organization strives to encourage people to use RDP to access servers, but also provides the use of the console as a backup.  We want users to use the console as sparingly as possible.  Any suggestions on ways that allow the use of the console but make sure users will choose RDP on the console?  Perhaps bringing to logout the user after a period of time?

    My first reaction is of course the sharks with laser beams on their heads but I don't understand how this can cause logistical and budgetary problems. My second idea would be to only allow access to the consoles of a jumpbox they also RDP. So I guess that users would acquiesce to all RDP'ing to the box, that they wanted to administer anyway rather than the double jump, but give them the Console in case there was a situation of emergency or clear need.

  • process of splwow64.exe which prevents other users from printing

    Windows 2008 server 64-bit - on remote desktop, printing of the 32-bit application as a "modular" user, the splwow64.exe process opens and the job is printed application.  Once the splwow64.exe process opens for the user "modular", logging as long as another user to the 'mistest' application, the user cannot print from the 32-bit application.  Only when I end the splwow64.exe for the "modular" user process the user "mistest" will be able to print and then the splwow64.exe process left to the user "mistest".

    I found the Microsoft Article 2513330 and implemented the splwow64.exe registry key with a value of 0 in HEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\Sysprocs and then restarted the server.

    The registry setting has not solved the problem - the splwow64.exe process remains still open.  Microsoft has a solution to automatically close the splwow64.exe process after the print job is finished?

    Thank you

    Albert

    Hi Albertmis,

    The question you have posted is better suited in the TechNet Forums. Please see the following link for more information.

    Category of the Windows Server

  • How to prevent standard users from access to certain folders?

    I use Windows vista Ultimate OS, and I have two users on my laptop namely, administrator and Standard user.

    I don't want the standard user to see some of my personal records.
    Please help me, how can I do this. ???

    Password protect your account.  Users can log on their but yours is inaccessible to them.

    Go to start and click the icon at the top right which will take you to user accounts.

    Click on create a password for your account.

  • Progress bar - prevent the user from moving forward

    Adobe Captivate 9

    Is it possible to prevent a user from moving the progress bar?  I like including the progress bar, so that users know their progress but do not want to make them to move anyway.

    Any ideas?

    The easiest (only for HTML output) using the new widget from CpExtra of InfoSemantics. It has many more features that can be very useful, but it is not free:

    Introduction to CpExtra | Infosemantics Pty Ltd

  • Prevent the user account to change the time? Policy and security?

    I came across this site:

    http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/113557-date-time-allow-prevent-users-groups-changing.html

    I followed him.

    So, I logged in using the account that I am limited. It worked like a charm. I can't change the date and time. But problem, using the limited account, I can also access the "secpol.msc" and change the settings. If the person that I have limited knows how to make their account able to change the date and time using the secpol.msc, so it would be useless.

    What can I do to prevent some users from accessing the "secpol.msc"?

    Hi Erebore,

    Please follow the steps below and check to prevent certain users to access secpol.msc

    1. To open the local security policy MMC snap-in, click Start, type secpol.mscand press ENTER.
    2. In the console tree, double-click Application control policies, and then double-click AppLocker.

    3. Right-click executable rulesand then click create default rules.

    4. Three rules are created and listed in the Details pane of the MMC console:
    • To allow all users to run files in the default Program Files folder.
    • To allow all users to run files in the Windows folder.
    • Allow members of the built-in Administrators group to run all the files.

    When you create these three rules, you automatically prevent all administrator users to run programs that are installed in their user profile folder.

    I hope this helps. Back to us for any additional information on the question above. We are happy to help you!

  • Vista's Parental control prevents the launch of iTunes Store - allowing sites Web does NOT resolve.

    My daughter is unable to launch the iTunes store in iTunes when parental control is on.  If I turn off parental control it works.  See this post- http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistamedia/thread/64a593eb-8ae4-4605-86f6-8a941244f2d1/ - the answer it does NOT solve the problem, and you can see at least 3 others have the same problem as I am.

    To reproduce:
    -Download and install iTunes.
    -Create a user of Vista with Parental controls active.
    -Log in as user, and launch iTunes.  This method works.
    -Try to access the iTunes Store.  It hangs and never ends.
    -Add web sites to the list of 'Green' in the Parental control as suggested in the post mentioned above.  This has no effect.
    -Select "allow all websites and content.  There is still no effect.
    -Disable Parental controls for the user.  link iTunes Store arrives without problem.

    I find that my daughter is unable to access the iTunes store unless I have turn off the parental control.  I would use Parental controls.  Help, please.  Thank you.

    Rock you.  Yes, it seems that this problem could be solved by adding iTunes in the HTTPExemptions list.  In particular, adding a String key under:

    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Current Version\Parental Controls\HTTPExemptions

    The key name and the value must be the path to the executable to iTunes (c:\program files\iTunes\iTunes.exe on my machine).

    I guess the drawback here is that now that my kids could, theoretically, use iTunes to access any URL on the internet, but to my knowledge, there is nowhere in iTunes where they could just type a URL and go.  In addition, there are Parental control built into iTunes as well.

    Thank you!

  • prevent the file name change and auto complete field

    With the help of Acrobat DC Pro.

    Is it possible to prevent a user from changing the name of an acroform file if they save or save as?

    If it is not possible to prevent the user from changing the file name, is it possible to automatically fill a form field with the new file name when saving, or when you submit the pdf?

    I hope someone can help.

    Avoiding it is not possible.

    However, you can prevent the submitted file if it has a

    different name. This would require using a script, however.

    It is also possible to set the field to display the file name, by using this code

    at the level of the doc:

    this.getField("FileName").value = this.documentFileName;

  • Prevent users from opening a PDF form in preview Mac

    When I create an AcroForm, it does not have the same thing when someone doesn't fill it out in preview, and when I get the form back from them, some of the information in the fields of the form is missing.

    Is there a way to prevent Mac users from opening the form in the preview? Or give them a message that the form must be completed using Reader?

    You can't stop them to do (except while standing next to their computer with a big stick).

    You might consider having a large field on the warning page that the file should be used (or other), what is hidden using Acrobat JavaScript.

    Be aware that we are now dealing with a very large number of PDF readers.

    Included with computers: overview of Mac OS, Windows player.

    Included with the browsers: Chrome, Firefox.

    Included with portable devices.

    Anyone who gets a computer these days actually gets a PDF Viewer that's bad with shapes. You must give them a good reason to download additional software. (Or even, frankly, to renounce forms PDF. "I think that their day has passed to a general public who could fill out a form of browser).

  • Flex 4.6 Mobile Scrollbar optimization prevents the scroll position layout?

    Hi all

    With the release of flex 4.6, it seems that the mobile version of the wheel has been optimized. Now the wheel differs from creation of the scroll bar until the user interacts with scrolling... That all sounds good performance wise, faster page creation etc...

    But if I want to return to the position of the wheel before the user has interacted with the subject, IE to access particular viewpoint before you start to scroll, I don't know what to do. Initially I would have something like... myScroller.horizontalScrollBar.value = 100... but courses myScroller.horizontalScrollBar now has the value null.

    Am I missing something - y at - it another way.

    J

    OK found a work around...

    I extended the scroller class and added a few features such as...

    public function scrollerCreateHScrollBar (): void

    {

    If (! this.horizontalScrollBar & this.horizontalScrollBarFactory)

    {

    this.horizontalScrollBar = HScrollBar (this.createDynamicPartInstance ("horizontalScrollBarFactory"));

    Group (this.) Skin). AddElement (this.horizontalScrollBar);

    partAdded ("horizontalScrollBar", this.horizontalScrollBar);

    }

    }

    then called to create bars of the amine, when I want to that they...

    Hurra.

    J

Maybe you are looking for

  • find errors returned by the error handler simple vi

    When running the application in the development environment and after the application of the error handler code, I found would be Manager of simple errors that VI is a few errors which I do not know where on the block diagram the source code. Is it p

  • [Re: C4240 all-in-One] Printer is installed, but am trying to re - install when

    Greetings- I'll have a more annoying problem. My C4240 is installed and works fine, except that whenever she is on (I'm not my gear on 24/7), the PC detects it as "new hardware" and 'new storage device' and passes by the automatic installation proced

  • {MOVED} my built in mic does not work...

    I bought dell inspiron 15r 5520 and his microphone won't work, when I try to record my voice and reproduce it nothing washear, I check the microphone properties and it says it works, please help me,

  • Dead pixel blackBerry Smartphones and the problem with the case of my BlackBerry 9780

    Hello world Recently, I bought a BlackBerry 9780 by Vodafone Spain (23 December) and I found a few problems. One of them is the presence of a dead pixel in the upper right and the feeling of the case a little weak in the left side that, when you touc

  • Upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8 question

    I bought a 8 upgrade to Windows 7 Ultimate E winodws upgrade disc and when I run the Setup from the disk, it gives me the error message; You cannot install an intermediate version on an no intermediate version with the installer. How can I fix?