Problem of image quality in the publication

Similar Questions

• The image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs... The 5Dmark3?

  I use Leica lenses on a canon with an adapter body.  Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar?  A reason to get one against the other?  I like the idea that I can change the viewfinder on the Mk 2 screens. Any overwhelming improvement in the 5Dmark 3 that would justify the review?  Thanks to those who have used the two boxes.

  The main advantage of a Mk3 on the Mk2 is the AF.  Most points and it can focus with f/8.   If your Leica lens is manual focus, then you would not care to this topic.  3 5 has a bit of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor.  Another one, I'd say that IQ is the same.

• Problem of image quality when you print the brochure in PDF format

  Hello!

  I searched the whole web, trying to find a solution for my problem, but I couldn't find anything...

  I created a vertical page A5 document in InDesign CS6, filled with high quality photos. Now, I want to print in a brochure (in PDF format) in order to save it and print it in a professional facility.

  The problem is when I do this, the image quality turns out to be terrible...

  I checked my print settings and I can not find something wrong...

  Installation - A4 horizontally, and Graphics - Images - send data - is set to all.

  Is there anything else I can / try? What can I do it wrong?

  Here is a picture of my print settings:

  

  When I export the document normally in format PDF the image quality is fine, but it doesn't have the booklet layout I need, it exports all single A5 pages one after the other. If I try to print this pdf file as a booklet in Adobe Reader, the same thing happens to the images, they lose quality.

  Help, please!

  Thanks :))

  tepatroni wrote:

  Now, I want to print in a brochure (in PDF format) in order to save it and print it in a professional facility.

  Have you checked withthei 'professional establishment' as to what they want. Printers will not, in general, impose you the document. It's their job and they do it in a way that corresponds to the study and the equipment they use for printing.

  That said, your problem with low quality images is probably the default PDF settings. Change them to something useful in Pringter in the Windows properties, or click the settings button in the print dialog box to access the driver from there and set them as you want. I'm sure that when the default installed PDF printer is 'standard' gives you the output of RGB 72 ppi.

• IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

  Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

  Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

  Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

• The upgrade and image quality [compare the elements to Photoshop]

  Hello:

  I've been using 6 items (yes I know, pre-historic) to edit and organize my photos. My collection of items has about 2600 images. Time to upgrade and I am convinced that Lightroom is the way forward for the organization. My question is for the Assembly. Almost all of my editing has been managed by the elements basic stuff. I wonder if I need the full Photoshop provided with Creative Cloud.

  My first question is program Photoshop will produce a better quality in a picture if I did the same editing with my old Elements 6. There was an improvement in the image processing program?

  Notice please.

  Jim Rendos

  Hi Jim

  Camera RAW is certainly improved, the come of great change with PV2012 (process Version 2012 aka ACR 7) introduced with Photoshop CS6.  Other changes have been made to Camera RAW, and Lightroom even more, but their impact on the image quality is zero (AFAICR).  Of course, you'd have the same version of treatment with the recent versions of Lightroom if you take this route.

  The difference between PV2012 and PV2010 are noticeable in the shadow and highlight recovery.  Especially to hide him.  You remember produces bad artifacts setting shadows / highlights.  PV2012 allows you to push the bejazus from a RAW file while keeping things at least somewhere near sensitive.  I've always hated the shadows / highlights and could never understand the fuss people do about it.

  Who help me?

• Image quality of the slices

  I'm using the slices and the highest quality jpg of ' JEPG better quality ' is not enough high quality.

  How can I ideally change the image quality of JPEG, or export in a lossless format.

  IM using CS3 but I not thave CS5 access if necessary.

  Thank you

  Select SLICES.  Open the OPTIMIZE.  Change the setting value in the format PNG 24.  EXPORT (and not save) slices by choosing File > export.   HTH

• How to keep image quality after the downward revision

  I have a jpg of high quality, but after the scaling down to 30%, the quality is terrible when I Zoom. See the image below. How can I fix?

  

  You're both wrong. The solution is high end and then reduce a precomp. And Rick Gerard, I would appreciate that you stopped to insult my AE skills. I am a professional paid for 8 years. It's just something that doesn't come every day.

• Can someone explain images poster on the publication on the Web?

  I just realized that my poster images were not behaving properly and this led me to this scenario:

  I publish using 'Web' checked in the settings of publication. An image of the poster IS created in the folder images (maybe because I did it manually). My question is, where is out of calling her edge? Between the .html and the _edge.js, or contain the word "post". I want to see how it is used, but can not find not actually used.

  Now, reference is made to the "poster" in the file edge.5.0.1.js, but Edge animate like jack names, and mine would actually be 'poster2.png '. Then it wouldn't even find it anyway.

  In documentation of edge on the parameters of publication, the two publish options OEM and iBooks gives a picture of the poster-special mention, but the 'Web' option does not work.

  Can someone please explain this to me? Only the OEM and the iBook are capable?

  Thank you very much!

  Nevermind, it seems that it was not publish correctly. After the restart and publish it again all of a sudden, I got everything I was looking for in the head. Like many things with this program... who knows. Thanks for the deletion.

• Problem of image quality in zoom back

  My video Flash contains a jpg image with a white sign with black text. Over a period of 4 seconds the screen zooms a close-up of the disconnection at a glance full of the whole image. I get some "hesitation" or "quavering" in the image sign during this transition (a bit like a mirage in a desert). When I have a problem in the video mounted with Premiere Pro I would normally use Photoshop to add a blur to the image which usually resolves (a problem deinterlacing if I understand correctly). But this trick doesn't seem to work in Flash 8. Someone else has run into this problem or a solution? Thanks for any help you can provide.

  Thanks for the suggestions. I have improved the appearance until it is acceptable. I increased from 12 to 24 and 30 fps. I have shortened the period of about 3 seconds to 1 second zoom and used a higher resolution instead of jpg png (which increased the size of my file of 160 to 422 KB). I'll work on getting the size of the file down. But it is presentable. Thanks again.

• Regrowth problem: very bad quality of the text

  Hi, thanks for taking the time to read my question.

  I am just familiarize themselves with CS5 and were very excited to try the new feature 3D regrowth, BUT when I do the text is of very poor quality, judge for yourself:

  

  Or: http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx195/eXqutr/Quality.png

  I use a new laptop, I bought it at the beginning of the summer.

  TECHNICAL DATA:

  OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

  Processor: Dual Core Intel Core processor i3 - 350 M (2.26 GHz, 3 MB L3 Cache)

  Graphics card: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 (512 MB)

  Memory: 4 GB (2 DIMMs) DDR3 system memory

  HARD drive: 500 GB at 5400 RPM or hard drive hard drive 500 GB-7200 RPM

  Display: 15.6 "diagonal high definition HP LED BrightView (1366 x 768)

  If there is any other information that could help, let me know. Thank you in advance.

  -Metin k.

  Hi Metin,

  What are your see is the quality setting interactive for rendering (without anti-aliasing). If you want to see the smooth contours change render settings > quality: to Ray Traced (draft or Final).

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/CS/using/WS9895072D-F6CF-4C39-B28B-D8B49769DF1A.html

  

  Kind regards

  Steve

• Loss of quality of the image after you have placed?

  Hi people, I could really use some advice here. Currently, I'm going to print a document and have encountered some problems in image quality.

  More specifically, when I compare the quality of my original images (fit) to the quality of the images placed in InDesign, images in InDesign (and later, in the events of printing) are heavily pixelated.

  I don't know if this image as an attachment is important enough to illustrate this problem, but the small window is open TIF image (and zoomed in) in Windows Picture and fax viewer and it is superimposed on the image when zooming-in in InDesign.

  I've only used InDesign for a couple of years, so I really hope that I made an obvious mistake, but I can't seem to find a solution to this problem after having spent the afternoon on Google and Adobe forums trying to find a.

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Aryn

  

  Additional information:

  -with the help of InDesign CS4

  -J' set the display of high-quality performance

  -J' checked the link

  -J' tried to rebinding

  -l'image has not been resized in InDesign

  -J' tried to create a new image and place again, with the same results

  Windows Image & Fax Viewer is not really the best tool to inspect the images with. I suspect that your original image can be as pixelated as InDesign shows, while the Image Viewer smooth it on enlargement; It is certainly * not * show "real pixels as rectangles.

  (Word is another program that did this same dirty trick - prompting complains like "my image looked better in Word," while in fact they are worst but blurred into oblivion.)

  You need to see in a real program, such as Photoshop. (The actual pixel dimensions that Peter also claims would help.)

• Who has the highest image quality?

  I'm working on a huge project, analysis of the thousands of books, documents and files that I have collected over the years in the form of PDF files. I use a scanner high speed when possible, using a dish only for items that cannot be digitized with a scanner high speed (large size files and folders in several pages for example). My plan is to digitize everything as quickly as possible, so I can have a digital copy safely stored in my computer and some external hard drives. This is probably what I need to do for only text files, which I can throw then (the copy of the paper, that is).

  However, I want to make a new image analysis (and perhaps some elements of text) at a higher resolution on my scanner so I can have copies of higher quality. Then I'll try to figure out the best resolution and what file type to save as. I use a scanner Epson Perfection V33. Am I right in thinking that quality would be offered by a .tiff file, followed by a .jpg with a .pdf file file lower quality?

  The quality of most of my material is not extraordinary, and I probably won't be much as TIFF, scanner due to the huge file size. So I think that the best option for images (and the text that I might want to scan as an image) is jpg. Is there any particular optimal resolutions that you would recommend?

  Thank you.

  "Image quality" in a document PDF is created by the image quality of the image that is presented in the PDF document.

  A PDF file can and often there are a lot of images with each having a different image resolution.

  If you have content text on paper and that you want to scan it, go to TIFF and then create a PDF of TIFF.

  This optimises the accuracy of OCR recognition.

  JPEG production involves typically "ugly" compression (compression by destructive removal of content) - not too goof to images of text that you want to pass by OCR.

  Analysis of the text to TIFF - 300 dpi will suffice in most situations. Avoid JPEG compression.

  Be well...

• Why image quality is lost when I publish my slide show on a DVD?

  After you have created a slide show big in movie maker, when I go to publish on DVD there is then a BIG loss in the quality of the image, makes me very sad :-(
  Any idea on how to keep the image resolution during the publication on DVD?

  After you have created a slide show big in movie maker, when I go to publish on DVD there is then a BIG loss in the quality of the image, makes me very sad :-(
  Any idea on how to keep the image resolution during the publication on DVD?

  ====================================
  If your (registered) publication WMV video files are not the
  resolution you expected... you may need to use a Custom
  Profile:

  Personally, I find the following .wmv profile to be
  useful when recording movies.
  Slide show-1024x768WMV9

  Download from the following site...

  Movie Maker - economy
  Movies - profiles custom WMV
  http://www.Papajohn.org/mm2-SavingMovies-CustomProfiles.html

  Right click / Save target as... drop in the following Vista folder:
  C:\Program Movie Maker\Shared\Profiles
  (you will need to create the profiles folder, if it is not there)
  Profiles customized for Win XP, Movie Maker will work with
  Vista Movie Maker 6.

  The last section of the following article explains how
  Publish (save) by using a custom profile.

  Windows Vista
  Create custom movie settings
  for Windows Movie Maker
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/create-custom-movie-settings-for-Windows-Movie-Maker
  Volunteer - MS - MVP - Digital Media Experience J - Notice_This is not tech support_I'm volunteer - Solutions that work for me may not work for you - * proceed at your own risk *.

• More specific anti-aliasing prevents multiple images rendering at the same time after awhile

  Hi all.

  I am experiencing inconsistent memory, behaviour management when rendering my AE project that prevents me from making several images at the same time when some elements of film use accurate antialiasing.

  I have a processor 8-core i7 MacBook Pro with 8 GB of RAM and I am using AE CS5.5. I visited a project with several Illustrator layers imported to keep things nice and crispy. Here is a 3D with one camera, DOF, composition and they are continuously rasterized. On some of the vector assets I have to set the antialiasing for "More precise" in the dialog box interpret footage to address some problems with image quality. Here's what I noticed when rendering:

  1. when anti-aliasing on all assets of Illustrator is set on "Faster" return it without issues composition.

  2. I change the setting of antialiasing on some assets of the Illustrator to "More specific" to improve the quality of the image. Made of several images at the same time is off. Composition makes for a while, but eventually I get an error: "after effects error: unable to allocate enough memory for file antialias (50:5).

  3. to work around the error I load AE to empty the memory cache all 5 images or less via the Secret menu in the preferences. This prevents the error from happening and I can see the RAM being deallocated when from time to time as expected. This allows me to return the quality I need, but it is slower.

  4. in order to expedite things I light made simultaneous multiple images. I use the conservative settings: AE is to use only two hearts with 3 GB of RAM by heart (the maximum allowed). The rendering is accelerated. However, I see that the system "in use" RAM continues to increase at each image made up until the computer runs out, how AE automatically turns off made simultaneous multiple images and begins to display one image at a time. This does not happen whe all vector assets are defined to use fast antialiasing one I can make indefinitely with simultaneous multiple images rendering, but I don't get this way the desired quality. Please note that there is enough RAM for the carrots for multiple images rendering, but it seems as if having made a frame, the system is not free or reuse the memory when assets use specific anti-aliasing and will use another piece until there is no more.

  Also, I'm outputing to a sequence of images.

  Please help me to find a workaround for this problem. Thank you!

  This is probably a software design limitation (or bug) in the underlying code of Illustrator and there is no work around for this. You might dutifully report it here, but it's as good as it gets, and even when you do, you shouldn't be pregnant it be fixed anytime soon. In 12 years of use AE, that kind of thing never worked 100% right...

  Mylenium

• low image quality

  Why the quality of the image is so low that "Lossless" is selected in the settings?

  I used the image you provided and published three versions of it through presenter 8.0.1.

  The parameter without loss of image quality produced the worst result.

  http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p6ur1ich3eq/

  The high quality setting produces the most beautiful version of the image (and the file more large size enough curiously).

  http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p6bly926qu0/

  The medium quality setting produces an image that seemed acceptable, but noticibly less in quality at high speed.

  http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p1t9fyfx3fi/

  I would use the high quality setting as this seems to yield the best results for this image.