Problem of image resolution

Similar Questions

• H satellite L505-13 - problem with the resolution of games

  Hello, I have a problem with the resolution of games, I just that:
  800 x 600 and 1024 x 768
  Yet, I have the latest version of the ati driver and directx 11...

  Windows Dectet my monitor properly (plug-and-play), and my screen resolution works well for: 1366 x 768 and 800 x 600.
  on the other hand, when I start a game I have only the choice between these two resolution: 800 x 600 and 1024 x 768...

  All the games don t fit the full screen and there is always a black area on the right and left.

  Some games (crash)... and I thought it made a link with said that I have only 2 resolution.

  I have a toshiba L505 - h - 13 (PSLS9E)
  my graphics card: ati mobility radeon hd 5145 graphics card
  OS: win 7 32 bit

  I hope someone can help me find a solution
  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  I put t know what games you want to play, but generally speaking, it of also depending on the game you can use screen resolutions. For example if your game supports only 2 screen resolutions, you can only use these resolutions.

  So all you can do is update the driver DirectX and display. Then, look for an update (patch) for the game.

  Good luck! :)

• I have a problem with the resolution of Photoshop 6.

  I have a problem with the resolution on my laptop my laptop Lenove userface has a resolution of 3200 x 1800, my 2560 external monitor x 1440, and on two monitors of the user, the interface is so low that I can't read anything. What I am doing wrong.

  On my screen, that the same thing is happening with Bridge and Lightroom, on my laptop, these 2 programs are ok. I use on my Lenovo Windows 8, on my second laptop, I am running Windows 7 and here, I have no problems. I would really appreciate the help.

  There is nothing to do. CS6 does not support displays high-resolution.

  Mylenium

• When the maximum image resolution will be improved?

  1600 x 1600 pixels is just too low a maximum image resolution, especially for a product with the reputation of Photoshop. This means that I can't even record an image captured on my iPhone 4s to its original resolution. Why, if other applications can run layers and still save at higher resolutions can not Adobe? For what is supposed to be a high-end application, it offers images of low-end.

  This is an excellent suggestion cjh! Some of our other users requested this improvement as well. You can Add your vote for this proposal as well as offering other suggestions in the ideas of this forum section. Our product team is constantly looking at the list of ideas of our clients to determine the priority of the new features and improvements.

  Thanks for your comments,

  Luanne

• image resolution from 72 to 300 for printing

  Hello photoshopers.

  If I want to print a large banner or anglo-saxon who will be 10 meters by 5meters height.lets say that I do my documents settings 10 cm x 5 cm, 72 dpi for the mac work faster, could I then change the parameters of the document at 300 dpi or my impression would be pixelated?

  is it recommended to change the resolution from 72 to 300 at the end of a project?

  Thank you.

  You do the math in your report of scaling.  What you have to do, is reach around 100ppi resolution of image to the final size of 100% for display panel output large-format.  You might get away with a resolution of 72 DPI of image, so if your scale is 400% (or size of file @ 25%); a 300ppi in the file image resolution will work.  Now, to answer your question... No.  Final resolution should be predetermined in construction of file / origination.  So, if you want 300 dpi resolution of the document at 100%; the resolution of the file must be 1200 dpi / min 300 ppi.  Try to get used to prepare your files in this way.  There go that final resolution of your needs are for each project.  It is faster to work at 72 dpi, however, I'm not sure that it is a good idea because generally, the effects of rasterization do not regenerate well sizing up to 300 DPI afterwards.

• How can I change screenshot image resolution?

  If I want to take the image on the screen in Encore CS5 and save it as a photoshop image resolution is 70 DPI.  Is it possible to change the resolution?  I would like images plus net if possible, 100 DPI to 200 DPI if possible.

  Yet CS5

  Processor 2.4 ghz Core 4

  6 GB of Ram

  700 GB of free hard disk

  Windows 7 64 bit

  except why photoshop would still show as 72 pixels/inch and Womble as 100 pixels/inch, shouldn't they show the same thing?

  If you look back to the top the dimensional differences between the images of these two programs, you will see the difference. Do not have these exact dimensions at hand. If you change the size of the Image of the PrPro version to 100 PPI, with her resample UNCHECKED, the inches x inches dimensions should be very, very close. In addition, in the press, the difference between a 72 vs 100 PPI, although inches x inches dimensions were identical, would be almost impossible to see.

  Good luck and we hope this helps,

  Hunt

• Recommended image resolutions / ratios for PDF files

  Hello

  is there a recommended image resolutions / ratios for PDF files? As if I want my image to 100 x 100 pixels, should its JPEG source or what is 500 x 500 pixels? I want to make a good impression / about zoom, but without compromising the size of the file.

  Thank you!

  I take this to mean that you expect people to print on a desktop printer, is not that you are planning to print 10,000 on a press.

  In this case, you can safely downsample at 150 dpi to reduce the file size without seriously damaging the image quality to print (but use a high quality zip or jpeg compression).

• Problem with the resolution when you connect to a projector

  I regularly used my laptop connected to a projector via a cable VGA for PowerPoint and video clips view in Windows Media Player.   It is automatically detected and adjusted for different sizes of screen of the laptop screen (1366 x 768) and projector (1024 x 768) and projected with success.   Recently I connected the laptop to a second monitor - also 1024 x 768 - instead, and even once, it fits perfectly.

  It suddenly stopped setting for the resolution of the projector; When I go to the resolution of the screen, the option to set the resolution of the second screen is grayed out.   No matter if I use extend or duplicate, he insists that the two screens are 1366 x 768.   This has happened with two projectors, all two used to work properly.   I also tried different VGA cables.  The end result is that the image of the projector is hurry to tray.

  I can connect fine to the second monitor via the VGA port and sometimes with different resolutions for both screens.   I can also connect to a TV via an HDMI cable.   I can't try a HDMI cable for the spotlight as it is ceiling mounted, and the other is old and is not an HDMI connection.

  I checked the drivers and they seem to be up to date.

  My laptop is a Dell Latitude running Windows 7.   The graphics card is an Intel HD Graphics 3000.   I tried many suggestions already given on these forums without success.   The real puzzle is that it was working fine and nothing I can draw has changed except that I connected on the other monitor.

  Hi Tony,.

  Thanks for the reply with the status of the issue. I'm sorry to know that the issue is still unresolved, your efforts to solve this problem are much appreciated.

  I suggest to follow the method below and check if that helps:

  Method 1: Perform a system restore.

  System restore

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/system-restore

  System restore WARNING: when you use the system restore to restore the computer to a previous state, the programs and updates that you have installed are removed.

  Method 2: Uninstall all hidden devices:

  Step 1: See the article below to activate the devices hidden in Device Manager.

  Look at a hidden devices

  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/Windows/hardware/ff553955 (v = vs. 85) .aspx

  Step 2: After you enable hidden devices, remove devices from Device Manager.

  1. press start.

  2. type device manager in the start search box.

  3. Select Device Manager in the search result.

  4 uninstall everything that are grey also uninstall the drivers to display completely.
  5 restart the computer and install the drivers to view the manufacturer's Web site.

  Hope this information helps, just reply to the State of the question to get help.

  Hi Rizwan

  Unfortunately, I do not have a restore point old enough until the problem occurred.   I have not found any that was relevant in hidden devices, but in normal Device Manager mode when I clicked on "monitor" it opened a "Generic PnP" entry even when there was no extra monitor or projector fixed.   When an additional monitor has been attached, there were two of these entries.   I disabled them both, and I found that I can now adjust the resolution of a second monitor to a different setting of the laptop screen.

  Thanks for your help.

  Tony

• BlackBerry Smartphones image resolution / size changes by itself

  I found very frustrating problem with my Bold 9700. I took the picture with a great resolution and Superfine quality. Strangely, after a few viewing (+ zoom in/out) of all pictures taken, I found little had changed the resolution of the images! I tried taking another picture, consultation, ensuring that the resolution is great, then multimedia applications, closing and reopening and viewing of the image again. It happened again after the second observation if I did a few zoom / out.

  I'm very angry that some pictures are now small resolutions, and I can't trust viewing through media Apps again before copying the files to my computer first.

  Is this a bug or is there something that I did wrong while looking at the pictures? It's really annoying to have your photos changing by themselves without any warning whatsoever...

  linklunk wrote:
  Uploaded photos are very good. Also it looks like if I just leave the BB not used for a while (or just reset it), the images are at their original size. It's so clearly a problem with sort properties showing the different image size after zooming. (While the properties are sizes wrong; the thumbnails become too small, which makes me think of the media App reduce the size of the images.)

  in the multimedia application, the thumbnails and the file properties are stored in a cache file. It is likely that this cache was corrupted. Simply destroy this cache, and then the media application wil recreate immediately.

  the cache consists of a single file named BBThumbs.dat in each folder on the media card that contains a media file (mp3, ringtone, picture, voice, video note).

  1. Device connected to your computer after you enable the USB Mass Storage.
  2. Open Windows Explorer to view the contents of the media card (do not use the Desktop Manager or Media Manager orMedia Sync).
  3. View the & system files
  4. do a search for the BBThumbs.dat files and erase all (don't worry, recreate them will take only a few seconds).
  5. Unplug the computer
  6. Launch the media application. In the bottom of the screen you will briefly see a bar goes blue white. It's the indexing process which will recreate the cache.

• image resolution lower than that on the technical side, it should be

  PS / ID CC 2014

  Hello. I place a picture, don't resize it, real and effective ppi identically 468 (no tranparencies...), view the set of high quality, high quality set up in preferences. Post script screen resolution as a whole (which never seemed to be a problem before, but the "New Documents predefined resolution" this thread is speaking of a disappeared in any case). The images displayed at a resolution about half or less, and exported accordingly, as seen in Acrobat Pro.

  Why? What should do?

  Thank you.

  Know everything first, DISPLAY QUALITY THAT is only for your Indesign work faster or look better.

  Any file resolution imported in Indesign will not be changed.

  The only way to control the outcome of the resolution (not included the indesign effects like shadow), is the OUTPUT PANEL.

  If you have a high-resolution PDF in acrobat, you must change the output PDF Panel.

• Problems with images after the subclips

  Hey there

  Today I woke up to see all subelements, I made my most recent project. Just today, footage looked more pixelated and blurry.

  What might of happened? When I stop the image the quality is exactly as it was before. But when played his more pixelated.

  Some of the images was shot at a lower resolution, but when I put the size of the screen to the appropriate resolution quality always looks bad.

  Would this have something to do with the manufacture of the subitems? Even go back and see the clips that came the subclips: the film is even more 'pixely '.

  Any help appreciated

  @

  Hi pavalanche11,

  Sorry for the problem. If it is fixed?

  Please consider these points for this problem:

  1. it looks in any case related to subitems.

  2 as you mentioned after a break the clips, they look very good, but not the same case playing; It could be linked to the resolution Pause and play in the monitor Panel.

  You can get these settings, either by clicking the exit button in the lower right of the monitor Panel or by right clicking on the items in the monitor Panel.

  3. you also said that you pulled these clips at a lower resolution. By changing the values in the resolution of reading as suggested above, they may work properly.

  Here is the text of pdf help Prelude:

  Some formats are difficult to display in full motion by reason of their high compression or broadband playback. A lower resolution playback faster but at the expense of the quality of the image. This compromise is particularly visible when you view the other H.264 and AVCHD-based codec of the media. Less than full resolution these formats have turned off error correction, and artifacts are common during playback. These artifacts, however, do not appear in the exported media.

  Use separate reading and resolutions of break to better control the monitoring experience. With images high resolution, resolution of the reading to a lower value (for example, 1/4) for smooth playback and the resolution of the break in full. These settings allow you to check the quality of the details of development or the edge when you stop playing. Cleaning put the monitor resolution of reading, stop no resolution.

  

  I hope it helps. Customer feedback is important to us. Continue to write in the case of any confusion.

  Thank you

  Mayjain

• Old problem with images HD upgrade taking into account

  Hi all

  I've been here with this issue since day one with my rig (2.5 years).

  I'm not able to edit HD images correctly, the editing process is super slow, I can't seem to get an overview of the sequence, because it comes to accuse.

  The images are numerous cameras each film, DSLR, GoPro, MTS, etc..

  I work at 90% of the time with a single video stream.

  
  

  My current setup is:

  I7 2600 k 3.4 (no OC), p8z68 v pro MOBO, 16 GB of ram (4x4Go G.Skill RipJaw X Edition Dual Channel CL7-8-7-24)

  GTX 560 Ti

  caviar black 500 GB sata for os 3

  2 * 1 TB caviar black sata 3 raid for project & media

  2 * 1 TB sata 3 raid of black caviar to Scartch, Renders, etc..

  caviar green 2 TB for backups.

  * using the embedded raid controller.

  
  

  My workflow is really painful, I work with proxy files to overcome the problem of slow editing;

  1. get clips hd from the client

  2 encoding files in low resolution avi/mpeg

  3 mounting

  4 link sequences HD media (manually - approx. 30-40 minutes)

  5 error checking

  6. review of the movie - very slow due to the HD

  7. export

  Then. any movie, takes forever.

  A lot of people are trying to help with my current hardware, but I couldn't find a single solution to the problem.

  So, I want your advice, I had to upgrade my rig? because if I know that the update in a budget will have things smooth, it will be worth it in the short term.

  If you recommend the upgrade, which should go for? What can I keep?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Mehdi.

  Biran, welcome to the forums

  Because of your GoPro and DSLR media without any overclocking you really need a lot more CPU power.  At least a hex-core.  But the first thing you need to do is read encyclopedia of prejudice on building a computer Assembly for Premiere Pro on our web site, in particular its Pages Tweakers.  Especially look at this chart to see why you need this upgrade of the CPU.

  

  Note that the GoPro and DSLR QT are both very intensive CPU.  Initially you could just start with a new motherboard, processor and CPU cooler; and possibly reuse your RAM, GPU and hard drives.  We should know more info about your business supply and power.  The next update (later) would be in the area on the hard disk.

• Problems loading images png in flex 4.

  For some reason any in my application when I use specific PNG images they will not load.  They do not have a high resolution, or they are very important.  For example: does not load in a component of mx:Image, but will be.  Does anyone have an idea, what would be the difference between the two?

  the mxml that I use is something like < mx:Image source ="IMG/imagename.png"/ > where IMG is a file in the main directory.  The two images are stored only in those places and yet it will load and the other won't.

  It's incredibly complicated to me, and I would be grateful for all the assistance.

  First of all, I would like to try, in your IMG file, rename badfile.png to xbadfile.png and then duplication goodfile.png to badfile.png, without changing your code.  Then, run it and check that you do not see the png.  That is to ensure that the problem is really with the png and not your code somehow.

• Flash - how is the HUGE issue of image resolution and HD - support

  Hello Flash Forums,

  It's been a while since I've posted, but I would love to inform me of some of the old pros here concerning best practices using flash for large-scale environmental labelling:

  1 flash supports high definition correct? I did a google search and see that it does - but not sure that I need a plug-in or it is just a parameter? My question is more inspiring-animation flash maybe highDef, or only the videos that it displays?

  2. I'm working on a graphic very large environment (like 40 ft high) and curious to know if anyone can tell me how you deal with images at this size? I remember vaugely that they do need to be 300 dpi, but I still need to maintain a certain resolution?

  Thanks for any help you can provide!

  B

  The limiting factors, that you're going to have case are more likely to see with what will actually being run / play your Flash content and feed it to this view. Who is responsible for the implementation of the computer system that displays this could answer. Discover the resolution of their screen set up. It will probably take a projection installation, which shows regardless of the media to a size of enlargements of. Ask if the HD 1080 video will work and if they used before, and how did he watch, etc.

  If the screen ends up having a resolution of something of significantly higher resolution monitor 'high' of what a designer is, have not necessarily to have your Flash showing 100% and fill all these pixels. You can have good results by creating your Flash to width reasonale & height and then scaling that 150%, 200%, etc.

  Flash displays no problems dispalying 1080 HD video, and nothing is required other than the Flash plugin. It continues to be updated to Flash Player for improving video support, so make sure you get the latest version installed on any computer that plays. YouTube has begun to show the full HD (1080) all the time, and the thread and so you can always check this site to see videos how smooth are.

• Problem of image quality in the publication

  All my images in my publication are TIFF - and very high quality images. There are some images that show the pixelated very high (and printing). They are sized to fit their bounding box properly and I even tried completely remove the image and re - insert. Any ideas what could cause this problem? All but two images are very well... I don't get what is happening here. I use CS3 on a PC platform. The images have been prepared as a PSD in Photoshop then flattened and saved as .tiff files.

  Thanks for your help!

  Do you mean that place the PSD files directly in the composition is very good as well?

  Yes, it's what Bob says. It is not only beautiful, but it may be better.

  I have create a PSD that contains all the settings for the picture having a layer turning them into black & images in white who is the final adjustment that I do and I then create them versions color and black & white this.

  You could save those DICE, place it in InDesign and control layer visibility in InDesign. You would only have a single image, placed on two occasions and could transform the power adjustment layer to get your color and b & w versions.

  Of course, none of this directly addresses the issue of the quality that you see. It would take probably more detail regarding the size/resolution of the image and attitude to solve problems which here of output.