question static pix 515

Similar Questions

• Question of pix 515 2 ISP

  I have a client with a 515 cisco pix. Is it possible to have 2 separate configs on the pix and power quickly select what config you want to begin? My client had problems lately with his main ISPS who happens be the fastest connection between the 2 and when it comes down there do intellectual property changes on the pix to perform the failover manually.

  Ok..

  I have a client with a 515 cisco pix. Is it possible to have 2 separate configs on the pix and power quickly select what config you want to begin?

  -YES, YOU CAN CONFIGURE YOUR PIX 515E IN MULTIPLE CONTEXT

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808d2b63.shtml

  My client has had problems lately with its main ISP which is be the fastest connection between the 2 and when it breaks down there manually make changes to intellectual property on the pix to make the transition to the

  -YOU CAN CONFIGURE "FAI DOUBLE FEATURE."

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml

• Question STATIC pix

  I have a static mapping for my mail server (public to private IP address) and I was curious about the behavior of a static mapping. I got just as much as to process the incoming packets. But what happened in outgoing traffic from the server? The pix to see a package of outgoing e-mail and insert this public static address as the IP source address?

  Yes, he does. It uses the static statement as it would NAT, except that it always uses this external IP address assigned instead of pulling an IP from the NAT Pool address.

• A question about the old Pix 515

  Hi Experts.

  My client needs additional interfaces of FE and do not want to migrate the chassis 515E.

  Can the data sheet of the former 515 Pix no longer available due to the declaration of the EOS, you please confirm that the Pix 515 supports 1FE - PIX and PIX - 4FE cards before ordering one of them?

  Thank you

  The 515 supports 4 interface cards. Make sure they are running a UR pix license if - 515R takes only supported 3 interfaces.

• PIX 515 DMZ problem

  Hello

  We have some difficulty in moving traffic in and out of a Cisco PIx 515 firewall. We use it with two demilitarized. The first DMZ has a mail in her Server (before end mail server) that communicates with a different mail server (back end mail server) inside, it is called DMZ1. The second DMZ (DMZ2) has some users who are expected to pass through the firewall to the outside and use the internet and must have access to the e-mail DMZ1 server. Inside users must be able to use the Internet and can access DMZ1. Here's the important part of our Setup.

  What we were doing, we can correctly access from inside, inside users to access internet permit to join the DMZ1 e-mail server and the mail in DMZ1 server the inside. Our problem is that we are unable to browse the internet on the DMZ1 Messaging server if we put DMZ1 as gateway ip address on that server and the address ip of the DNS of the ISP is propely located on the same machine. Also, we could not do DMZ2 users browse the internet, although we allowed the www Protocol in the fromOut access list. One last question, can we do the DMZ2 a DHCP server on the interface on the PIX and do distribute ip addresses to users on that subnet only? Thanks for any help in advance.

  6.3 (3) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 car

  Auto interface ethernet1

  Auto interface ethernet2

  Auto ethernet3 interface

  !

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  nameif ethernet2 dmz1 security50

  nameif ethernet3 dmz2 security40

  !

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  !

  names of

  !

  IP outside X.Y.Z.163 255.255.255.248

  IP address inside 192.168.0.9 255.255.255.0

  dmz1 192.168.10.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  IP address dmz2 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  fromOut list of access permit icmp any host X.Y.Z.162 source-quench

  fromOut list of access permit icmp any host X.Y.Z.162 echo-reply

  fromOut list of access permit icmp any unreachable host X.Y.Z.162

  fromOut list of access permit icmp any host X.Y.Z.162 time limit

  fromOut list access permit tcp any host X.Y.Z.162 EQ field

  fromOut list access permit tcp any host X.Y.Z.162 eq telnet

  fromOut list access permit tcp any host X.Y.Z.162 eq smtp

  fromOut list access permit tcp any host X.Y.Z.162 eq www

  !

  fromDMZ1 list of access permit tcp host 192.168.10.2 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  fromDMZ1 list of allowed access host ip 192.168.10.2 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  !

  fromDMZ2 list of access allowed tcp 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  !

  pager lines 24

  !

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  dmz1 MTU 1500

  dmz2 MTU 1500

  !

  Global (outside) 1 X.Y.Z.164 netmask 255.255.255.248

  Global (outside) 2 X.Y.Z.165 netmask 255.255.255.248

  NAT (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

  NAT (dmz1) 1 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.255 0 0

  NAT (dmz2) 2 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

  static (inside, dmz1) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0

  static (dmz2, dmz1) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0

  static (dmz1, external) X.Y.Z.162 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  !

  Access-group fromOut in interface outside

  Access-group fromDMZ1 in interface dmz1

  Access-group fromDMZ2 in the dmz2 interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.Y.Z.161 1

  Hi jamil,.

  There is a sentence on the URL I sent you, you can now activate dhcp option within the interface. Just check this...

  REDA

• Upgrade from PIX 515

  Hi all

  My company needs upgrade its PIX 515 to have the function VPN 3DES for remote site connection. So I just need to buy a license of 3DES for the PIX functionality? and can I also upgrade the IOS 6.1 so that I can use PDM to config the PIX? And I also need to upgrade the memory in the PIX?

  Thank you very much!

  Best regards

  Teru Lei

  Yes to the first question.

  Better 6.2 and pdm 2.1 I think.

  How much memory do you have? Reach

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/prod_release_note09186a00800b1138.html#xtocid4

  There is memory for pix 6.2 requirements

  Good luck!

  --

  Alexis Fidalgo

  Systems engineer

  AT & T Argentina

• How to open a port and limit the range of addresses that use it on PIX 515?

  I have a Pix 515 v6.3 and a new piece of software that I'm getting soon need aura 5080 open port for incoming & outgoing HTTP traffic. The server will be in my DMZ to 10.0.0.1

  I would like to restrict inbound access to this port so that it can be used in 4 specific IP adderess foreign xxx.xxx.xxx.24 through xxx.xxx.xxx.27 and also, if possible, limit the outbound destination using this port to a single specific foreign IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.30.

  Could you please tell me the best way to do it.

  Thank you in advance for a relative novice to PIX.

  PIX (config) # access list acl-outside permit tcp host xxx.xxx.xxx.24 host MyWWWPublicIP eq 5080

  PIX (config) # access list acl-outside permit tcp host xxx.xxx.xxx.25 host MyWWWPublicIP eq 5080

  PIX (config) # access list acl-outside permit tcp host MyWWWPublicIP eq xxx.xxx.xxx.26 host 5080

  PIX (config) # access list acl-outside permit tcp host MyWWWPublicIP eq xxx.xxx.xxx.27 host 5080

  PIX (config) # access - group acl-outside in interface outside

  PIX (config) # access list acl - dmx permit tcp host 10.0.0.1 xxx.xxx.xxx.30 eq 5080

  PIX (config) # access - group acl - dmz dmz interface

  static (inside, outside) MyWWWPublicIP 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  See also:

  PIX 500 series firewall

  http://www.Cisco.com/pcgi-bin/support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=hardware:PIX & s = Software_Configuration

  Configuration of the PIX Firewall with access to the Mail Server on the DMZ network

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008015efa9.shtml

  sincerely

  Patrick

• DNS traffic blocked after PAT - PIX 515

  I have PIX 515 with 3 named NIC (internal, external, dmz)

  I have 2 servers (Exchange and Windows 2000 with SMTP) in the demilitarized zone.

  I currently have a static command pointing to doamin for exchange Server IP address in the DMZ.

  I wanted to PAT on the IP address of the e-mail domain so that the configuration will look like as follows.

  The IP field will be used for the global IP

  all pop3 for global ip traffic will go to Exchange

  all www for the global IP traffic will go to Exchange

  all smtp for global ip traffic will go to the Windows 2000-based SMTP relay (SMTP relay is configured to send the e-mail received in exchange Server)

  I hosted DNS udp and tcp traffic to the servers.

  before pat, the server can use DNS to resolve IP domain e-mail and send mail to the Internet.

  As soon as I PAT the Internet e-mail delivery stops.

  When I did an NSLOOKUP command returns an error indicating that the DNS server cannot be resloved.

  The servere DNS used by these 2 servers are servers DNS of ISP.

  Is there any concern when you PAT.

  Thank you

  Hello

  I found the problem:

  for now, your dmz servers can go to the internet with pop3, smtp, and www. Only for these protocols is a (static) translation to provide in the config file.

  You will need to will provide you a translation for other protocols (for example, dns) also. This can be accomplished with one of the following two things:

  create a nat - pair overall for the DMZ for outdoor

  NAT (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Global (outside) 1 200.100.100.168 (already exists)

  create a static translation for each of the other protocols (next to pop3, smtp, www), you want to pass from the dmz to the internet (you already did that for www, pop3 and smtp).

  Kind regards

  Tom

• MM, pix 515 and mac filtering

  I have an application called MeetingMaker, located at the back of my pix 515 that is used off site by 5 users. Since accessing this program on the internet, and users can have dynamic addresses, it is possible to filter by mac address somehow to allow access through the firewall to the app? Thank you.

  MAC addresses not browse the limits of layer 3. In others, your MAC address of clients cannot be seen or known once the traffic passes through the default router for that subnet. So the answer to your question is 'no '.

  You can use AAA to handle this. How your clients connect to the server? (port/application)? If its HTTP/S, the Pix can check this name of user and password before allowing access. If it is a part on request/port, you can still use authentication by requiring them to connect to the web server out there first. This will cause the Pix to authenticate by using the challenge of browser, and the Pix can be configured to allow connections to the hosts authentiated.

• PIX 515 no traffic on the new IP address don't block

  We have received a new range of ips 213.x.x.x/28 from our ISP. They are routed through our existing entry door 92.x.x.146.

  The problem:
  We can not all traffic to the pix on the new 213.x.x.x/28 range.
  -If we try to ping 213.x.x.61, we get the lifetime exceeded.
  -ISP Gets the same thing of their router.
  -ISP tries ssh and gets no route to host.

  The ISP has ticked then double the Routing and the MAC address of our external interface. They are correct.

  The strange thing is that we cannot see THE log messages about the new range of incoming connection attempts. The Pix is running at the level of the journal 7.

  Does anyone have an idea what could be the problem? or suggestions for debugging the issue?

  Excerpt from config:
  7.0 (7) independent running Pix 515
  outside 92.x.x.146 255.255.255.240
  inside 192.168.101.1 255.255.255.0
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 92.x.x.145 1
  Access-group acl_out in interface outside
  acl_out list extended access permit tcp any host 213.x.x.x eq www
  acl_out list extended access permit tcp any host 213.x.x.x eq ssh
  static (inside, outside) 213.x.x.61 192.168.101.99 netmask 255.255.255.255
  ICMP allow any inaccessible State

  192.168.101.99 is a test with http and ssh linux server

  Any help much appreciated.

  PM

  dsc_tech_1 wrote:
  I have spoken to the ISP and confirmed the MAC address of the outside interface Ethernet0
  
      ISP says
  
      ...we are sending this correctly to your pix, you should see any traffic destined for a 213.x.x.0/28 address hit your interface at 92.x.x.146/32
  
  Yes 217.x.x.81 and 217.x.x.82 are routers owned by our ISP.
  Is there anything else I can ask the ISP in terms of testing/debugging? I've run out of ideas.
  

  If the routers are owned by your ISP, then the fault lies with them. They have a routing loop in their network and that's why packages are not your firewall. You have them shown the traceroute?

  They must focus on the routeurs.81 et.82 to establish why the packets are looped between these 2 routers. Until they fix this packet will never get your firewall.

  Jon

• Translation problem group on PIX 515

  Hi can someone help me with this?

  I'm trying to configure a PIX 515 to pass messages icmp from the interface vlan dmz configured on interface (Vlan 3) PIX inside interface.

  setting it up like this

  interface ethernet0 100full

  interface ethernet1 100full

  interface ethernet2 100full

  physical interface ethernet2 vlan2

  logical interface ethernet2 vlan3

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  nameif ethernet2 msx interieure4

  nameif dmz security7 vlan3

  SH nat

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  NAT (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  NAT (msx) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  Global HS

  Global (inside) 1 interface

  Global interface (dmz) 1

  Global (msx) 1 interface

  At this stage I am not concerened with access lists that I get the error message is as follows

  155:-echo request ICMP dmz:192.168.3.1 to 10.240.2.2 ID = 512 seq = 11520 length = 40

  305005: no translation not found for icmp src dmz:192.168.3.1 dst domestic group: 10.240.2.2 (type 8, code 0)

  I'm not an expert when it comes to the PIX can someone help. Two other things can help shed light on the problem, there is no configuration of routing between Vlan interfaces, this could be a problem? I tried a static command and still have the same error that the order was... static (dmz, inside) 192.168.3.1 192.168.3.1

  Hi David:

  As you try to allow host from an interface for low security to a high security interface, you must have

  static (high, low) high high

  In this case, you must:

  static (inside, dmz) 10.240.2.2 10.240.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  I assume that you already have an access list to allow the icmp message of echo applied to the DMZ interface. If it is not already there, just add an ACE to allow the icmp message to echo that you should be good to go.

  Sincerely,

  Binh

• PDM with PIX 515 does not work

  I just upgraded our PIX 515 of 6.1 to 6.2. I also added support FOR and loaded the version 2.1 of the PDM. I am trying to browse the MDP, but I can't. What Miss me?

  Hello

  have you added the following lines to your config file and have you used HTTPS to access the pix (http is not taken in charge, only https)?

  Enable http server

  http A.B.C.D 255.255.255.255 inside

  A.B.C.D is the ip address of the host from which you are trying to reach the pix with the pdm.

  If you're still having problems after the addition of these two lines, you might have a look at this page:

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/customer/110/pdm_http404.shtml

  Kind regards

  Tom

• PIX 515 and software version 6.3 (4)

  We have a PIX 515 (not 515E). Currently, we are running software version 6.2 (2). I was wondering if we can improve the software to version 6.3 (3) or 6.3 (4), or do we need to replace the hardware with PIX 515E?

  Also what should I do on my current PDM version 2.0 (2) if it is possible to upgrade the PIX to a 6.3 version?

  Thank you.

  You can run on the Pix515 6.34. It takes at least 16 MB of flash and 32 MB of RAM.

  If you use PDM, you will need to be updated also.

  Josh

• Limit the number of users for a pix 515 uauth

  I have a PIX 515 authenticate and authorize against a Cisco Secure ACS server for outbound internet connections (using the web prompt). For the purposes of scale, I need to know the maximum number of sessions competitor for these types of users. I know there is a limit of 16 reviews on simultaneous approval process (the process of logging in first), but once they are connected, is there a limit?

  Once connected, the number of connections is limited by the number of concurrent connections that can handle a PIX. For example, the PIX 515 E can handle a maximum of 130 000 concurrent connections.

• Cisco Pix 515 VPN problems

  Hi all

  Here's my problem, I have 2 PIX 515 firewall...

  I'm trying to implement a VPN site-to site between 2 of our websites...

  Two of these firewalls currently run another site to site VPN so I know who works...

  I can't do the second site to the site to launch the VPN... when looking on the syslogs I get refused packages...

  Protected networks are:

  172.16.48.0/24 and 172.16.4.0/22

  If I try to ping from the Cisco (172.16.48.4) to 172.16.4.5, I get the following syslog:

  2 sep 02 2008 08:59:47 106001 172.16.48.4 172.16.4.5 incoming TCP connection doesn't deny from 172.16.48.4/1231 to 172.16.4.5/135 SYN flags on the interface inside

  It seems that the tunnel is trying to initiate, but something is blocking the internal traffic to penetrate through the VPN.

  Don't know what that might be, the other VPN are working properly.

  Any help would be great...

  I enclose a copy of one of the configs...

  Let me know if you need another...

  no road inside 172.16.4.0 255.255.252.0 172.16.48.1 1

  Remove this path should you get. Please rate if it does. Similarly, if you have a road similar to the other end, it should be deleted as well.