Re: Qosmio xX770-11W - game performance issues

Similar Questions

• Performance issue Windows 7 after installing a game Psychonauts

  Original thread: I defragmented my hard drive, my computer won't start?

  While I was trying to run the game "Psychonauts" steam, which had worked fine on this computer, back on the first installation of Windows 7 I had. In November my OS stopped working completely, and to this day I don't know why. I had Ubuntu since then, and I got Windows 7 back on here again in July, the same person who bought the computer from. Psychonauts worked until I got to the world of Waterloo (a level in the game). Research online told to defragment my hard drive, so I jumped into that knowing exactly what I was doing. Smart, I know. I don't know how long it was, but all of a sudden my computer is turned off and shut right down before arriving at the Toshiba screen. I left for a few hours and came back, turned on, and ran startup repair. He finished after about 20 minutes, said I had to check Microsoft for solutions or something, then it prompted me to shut it down. I did, tried to leave it to the top, it works. Sorry for the long intro. I just want to know if my computer will be correct? Is this what I can run (the irony) to check it out? I had so many problems with it already, I don't know how much more it can survive.

  Hello
   
  
  1 is that the problem is specific to the game Psychonauts?
  2. you receive an error message/code?
  3 are you facing any other issue on the computer windows 7?
   
  Follow the steps.
   
  Method 1: resolution of Performance problems to automatically find and fix problems. If please click the below mentioned link and follow the instructions.
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/open-the-performance-Troubleshooter
   
  
  Method 2: to help troubleshoot error messages and other issues, you can start Windows by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
  Note: Follow step 7 to reset the computer to start as usual after the boot process.
   
   
  Method 3: perform the steps mentioned in the statutes of the help.

  The problems of the game performance

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/fixing-game-performance-problems

  Diagnosing basic problems with DirectX

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/is-is/Windows7/diagnosing-basic-problems-with-DirectX

   

  Response with more information to help you.

• Performance issues when coming out of sleep

  I recently built a gaming PC. On Christmas day, I finished putting the thing together. It has an Intel i7-4790 CPU running Intel HD Graphics, 8 GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM, an Asus Z97 - A Mobo and a 2 terabyte Seagate HDD. I installed Windows and put everything in place. Then a week later, my MSI GTX 970 arrived in the mail.

  So, I take the thing to sleep and decreases the performance of the whole thing. Videos YouTube stutter, simple as games fight of World of Tanks to run at its usual rate of 60 fps. To avoid this, I simply restart my comp and then it works fine. performance is back to normal.

  A few weeks, Windows gave me a message on one of the Nvidia drivers causing performance issues when you wake up from sleep. I don't think a lot of it and rejected it. I'll try to reinstall all my Nvidia drivers. I uninstall the Intel HD graphics driver a few days ago and has not changed anything. I would appreciate an answer to this problem because I would like to continue to use the "sleep mode" because it consumes less energy and prolongs the life of my case of LED. Thank you!

  In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

  If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

  
  

  Please run the trace when you encounter the problem

• Satellite A200/W00 - abandoned game performance

  I have a laptop Toshiba A200/W00.
  It has 32 bit Vista Home Premium installed on it, a 2.2 gHz Core 2 Duo processor, 2 GB of RAM and an index of performance of 4.7.
  It has two hard drives of 160 GB in it.

  Several months ago I had problems with my laptop which made me resort to having to run my recovery disks to bring the laptop to default values. This bothers me not at all, as everything I had on it was recoverable.

  This recovery wiped only my HDD 'hand', leaving the other completely intact and works perfectly, all this that was on it was always there, etc.

  After I had reinstalled, updated my laptop completely (running DirectX 10 as opposed to the 11 that I had before), there has been a noticeable drop in performance in my games.

  The games that I could run easily before no longer work. I used to be able to play Assassin Creed on parameters almost at the maximum and play Unreal Tournament 3 on smaller settings without a single problem. But trying to play these games now, they usually freeze and crash when I try to play them. An other ways I noticed a drop in performance was in the Warcraft 3 game with friends, playing DotA.

  My laptop used to load at the same exact time as laptop from my friend and now mine takes about twice as long as it used to load up. And to add on top of that: I bought a laptop a few years older than mine as my Toshiba loaded faster early last year.

  If someone would get to know what may have reduced the performance of my laptop and can help me, I would be very grateful. Thank you.

  In many cases a slow game performance is caused by a wrong or old graphics driver.
  So is that you have updated your graphics driver? You can find it on the Toshiba site.

  In addition, you must install the latest version of DirectX.
  Visit the Microsoft Web site to download and make sure you have Service Pack 1 installed.

  Everything right now that s what I can say.

• Upgrade Vista 32 and 64 for the recognition of additional memory and game performance

  I have a question for the computer.  I have a HP Pavilion Elite m9040n who has Windows Vista 32 - bit SP2 with 3 GB of memory.  From what I've been able to determine, the 32-bit version doesn't recognize up to 3.5 GB of memory and I need to install the 64 bit version of Windows Vista for additional memory can be installed AND recognized.  This system comes with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 (K) 2.4 GHz, at 1 066 MHz front side BUS and Socket 775.

  My question - would be upgrade to Windows Vista 64-bit and install another 4 GB for a total of 7 GB of extra memory for increased game performance.  Also, I have a graphics program which because of some image sizes (up to 96 inches - 19200 pixel everywhere) program that the bombs on me with "out of memory" messages.  I play World of Warcraft and Starcraft 2 right now.

  Thank you.

  Just another Hacker ol '

  In your case a newer graphics card improve performance much more compared to buying new RAM. You can then add more RAM. "A programmer is just a tool that converts the caffeine in code" Deputy CLIP - http://www.winvistaside.de/

• HP Elitebook 8570p - Windows XP USB very slow and the transfer rate performance issues.

  Hello. I was wondering if anyone else knows some performance issues with the HP Elitebook 8570p and Windows XP Pro - SP3.

  I get a VERY slow start, general poor performance (waiting time when opening files and programs).

  I asked to burn in tests that show that everything is good.

  USB transfer rates are VERY slow (tried all ports of a Seagate FreeAgent USB drive, which works fine on other laptops etc.) for example a 30-minute transfer a 7gig single file of the USB HD on the desktop. Only 3 minutes to do the same on another laptop.

  I think there are problems with the drivers, like Windows 7 works very well and does boot from a bootable USB.

  USB transfer rate are also good when starting from a Windows boot environment.

  I installed HP SoftPaq Download Manager, and all the drivers are up to date.

  Hello:

  I think outside of the box here... Select the Intel (r) 7 Series Chipset Family SATA AHCI Controller instead.

  If it does not, I raise the white flag.

  Paul

• ThinkPad X220t - how to increase FPS and game performance?

  Hi all

  I have question about how to increase the frames per second for purposes of gaming performance.  I have a Lenovo X220t ThinkPads with a processor i7 with 8 GB of RAM and graphics card by default. Sometimes, I use the computer for games even if it is not specifically designed for this.  I have a problem so far with most of the games, but some of the games that are more graphic intense tend to be slow and have a FPS very low.  I know that the main reason for this problem is that the built-in graphics card is not designed for serious games, but I'm looking for advice or tips that will help.  For example, disable the ability of the touchscreen would increase game performance? Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Cole

  p.s. other than this computer game has exceeded all my expectations. Excited use really touch Windows 8 features.

  
  

• HP 15 laptop: the problem with game performance

  I am computer usin 15-g206ax hp laptop and it has a Quad Core processor and 4 GB of ram and a 2 GB graphics card but its gaming performance isn't right please tell me what I can do to improve game performance

  There's not much to do. You have the graphics card AMD HD 8570 M with video memory dedicated. It's in the middle of the spectrum game is in question. Much better than most computers laptops but much less powerful than a true game machine. Just keep the current drivers is all. Lower Visual effects. There is no possible upgrade for the hardware.

• Smartphone blackBerry Storm performance issues (and suggestions)

  I want to start and say that I don't like my phone.  When it works (which is most of the time), it works fine.

  But there are certainly problems of software.  As a software engineer, the OS has some memory serious management problems.  This seems to cause most of the problems I'm having with the phone.  I'm running the latest Verizon S/W (v4.7.0.148).

  Problem #1:

  I am a paranoid person.  There are a lot of personal information on my phone, I have currently international calls helped that I need this feature.  So to protect me my phone is locked when it is the case or after a period of inactivity time.  It is a good practice.  Part of the draw to the fate of the Blackberry is the security that you can configure on the device (I'm not paranoid enough to allow all the protections of encryption - yet).  Problem of the storm is that it can take 1 to 5 minutes to get the phone unlocked when unholstering.  It is not an exaggeration.  As the performance of the memory gets worse, time takes more time.  If I had to make an emergency call, it could be the difference between life and death.  5 minutes is a long time to wait to call 911.  This must be corrected!

  Problem #2:

  The phone must be "reset" once a day to remember "lost."  It is just poor programming.  I don't know if this problem of BB OS or Apps I'm running, but in both cases, this isn't fair.  After the reboot if I go to the display of memory under options I could have about 3-5 MB of free memory.  After a few hours of use, this will almost always '0 '.  I installed MemoryUp Pro, which seems to have extended the period of time between the battery grips, but I still don't think we should ask all owners of BB Storm to pull there battery once a day.  The other answer I get is "do not run so many Apps.  I get all my applications when finished.  Are the only ones that I continue to turn: Blackberry Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, Google Talk and Google Maps (Latitude).  Other applications running, you can't get out (phone, browser).  I tried doesn't work is not the 'optional' tricks and performance has not really much better.

  Problem #3:

  Missed calls.  This is probably related to problems of memory above, but if the storm can be used as a phone, then I should buy something else.  Although the occurrence of this problem has gone down because I installed MemoryUp Pro and perform the reset once a day, sometimes still about 1 to 5 times.  It takes so long for the phone to 'wake up' when a call comes in (especially if it is holstered), at the time where I hit "Answer", a call has been Messaging voice or even worse, the phone doesn't ring at all.  All I get is a notification of appeal lacks the 'unknown number '.

  Problem #4:

  Battery performance could be improved.  The battery that comes with the storm has about 24 hours on 24 with the Radio and Bluetooth.  Really, this isn't a problem if you know it.  I solved the problem by buying a 2700 mAh battery for extended life of BoxWave I use when traveling.  Makes the storm bit bulky, it will give me 2-3 days of life.  I don't know how this could be improved if not

  I hope that the developers of RIM are trying to solve some of these performance issues.  Certain tasks should be a higher priority as they seem to have (like phone & Unlock).

  Sean

  Here is the link...

  http://www.BlackBerryForums.com/General-9500-series-discussion-storm/196496-latest-9530-OS-4-7-0-208...

• increase game performance

  Hi all

  Game performance increase by ReadyBoost in Windows technology?

  ReadyBoost provides an additional cache that allows you to read data from your hard drive faster than the hard drive itself. It is not a 'memory RAM', but it can be used to unload your system RAM from similar to caching techniques if the amount of available RAM is low. On the other hand, using an external USB device operations are significantly slower that operations within the actual system memory, so memory problems on game performance should be addressed by increasing the system RAM.

  Two observations: I tried ReadyBoost with 1.5 GB of RAM system and did not notice any improvement (maybe even some decrease in performance because of the additional operations of unloading on the USB device). With 8 GB of RAM, the most gourmet of memory games are rarely more than 3 GB, so there is no need of 'tricks '.

  Wrote BossDweebe, gives another aspect: 'Memory' for the games includes both large and largely independent, video memory and system memory. Memory system provides the data read / write to the hard disk, video memory (on the GPU / video card) allows to treat by the GPU calculations faster. You cannot accelerate the VRAM by increasing the system RAM and vice versa.

• upgrade performance issues - see my profile

  Hello world

  I have suffered from some performance issues and would like to hear comments on my current set in place.

  USE

  I use InDesign, Photoshop and Illustrator also throughout the day.

  SETUP

  -Intel i7 - 3770K @ 3, 5 GHz

  -16 GB Crucial RAM

  -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  -WDC WD1000DHTZ-04N21V0 1 to 10 k RPM 64 MB cache SATA drive at 6 GB/s (internal)

  I have not yet attributed this player for something specific

  -WDC WD5000HHTZ-04N21V1 500 GB 10 k RPM 64 MB Cache SATA drive with 6 GB/s (internal)

  It's my drive disk OS, applications, files of work and scratch

  -Software: Win7, WAA CC (not this latest version, there were issues, we had to go back to the previous version).

  WEAKNESSES

  1 RAM is small, I put at level 32 GB this week.

  2. video card is pretty low, but I rarely use first so maybe ok for now?

  3 discs: do you think that improving an SSD for OS and Adobe CC?

  I look forward to your opinions. Thanks in advance!

  Thanks for the information, Mohammad,

  What would you suggest for my existing 10 k TPM?

  I am considering a 256 GB SSD for my OS and applications. But think my scratch disk 500 GB and the 1 TB for my working files.

  Your thoughts?

• Performance issues with large number of nodes

  I am creating an application to display graphics (large), for example:

  

  But I ran into some performance issues, even for a relatively small number of nodes in the scene graph (+-2000 in the picture above). The graph is built, step by step, adding circles and paths to a StackPane. Circles and paths can be semi-transparant. For a small number of nodes, I get a solid 60 FPS, but this decreases over time to about 5 frames per second. As soon as I stop adding new nodes, the framerate shoot again up to 60 images per second. The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  My questions are:

  * Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  * This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)
  * JavaFX pulse recorder says such things, are there meaningful information in that I'm missing?

  PULSE: 1287 [163MS:321MS]

  T14 (0 + 0ms): col of CSS

  T14 (0 + 5ms): layout pass

  T14 (6 + 152ms): waiting for the minutes of the previous

  T14 (158 + 0ms): copy the State for graphic rendering

  T12 (159 + 0ms): dirty opts calculated

  T12: Path of the slow form for null

  T12 (159 + 160ms): painted

  T12 (319 + 2ms): Presentable.present

  T12 (321 + 0ms): completed the presentation of painter

  Counters:

  Background image of the region used cached: 14

  NGRegion renderBackgroundShape slow path: 1

  Nodes displayed: 1839

  Nodes visited during rendering: 1840

  Kind regards

  Yuri
  

  Basically, try some optimization of performance ranging from the simple to the complex.   Each of the changes below may provide you with an increase in performance.  Some will probably increase performance much more that others (depending on where is the real bottleneck).  I would probably start by replace the paths to the lines and reduce the number of Platform.runLater calls (as adding nodes that fall within the viewport can be difficult only).

  > The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  Place the nodes in the graph, which fall inside the viewport.

  > Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  Yes, there is no reason to call it more than 60 times a minute when the framerate of JavaFX is capped at 60 frames per second by default.

  > This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)

  Yes, it's a graphics system relatively low-end.  But, look at the comment of developer below - your CPU and choice of graphic primitives can also affect rendering speed.

  > Adding circles and the paths to a StackPane

  You don't need a StackPane to this, a group is a container easier and probably better.

  > may be semi-transparant

  Remove transparency * may * cause acceleration.

  ----

  You run may be:

  https://JavaFX-JIRA.Kenai.com/browse/RT-20405 : improve the rendering of path performance

  Maybe if you use lines rather than the paths, performance might improve.

  A comment by a developer on this performance tweak application is:

  «It is quite normal for applications that use arbitrary paths (if the node path objects, SVGPath, polyline, or polygon) because these paths are rendered in software.» As card circle, Ellipse, line and Rectangle very primitive forms easily to the operations that can be performed entirely on the GPU, which makes them essentially cheap. There is no need to compare the rendering of a complicated shape for rendering of simple primitives for this reason. »

  ----

  Setting the cache indicators can help, but probably only if you animate nodes.

  ----

  Present level of detail of your graph functionality so a chart with zoom out is not make as many nodes as a part of zoomed in.

  ----

  You run any code important calculation on the JavaFX application thread that could stall it?

  Can make you available a ftom so that others can reproduce your problems?

• Management performance issues and huge catalog

  I shoot architecture and real estate. I turn every day hundreds of frames and my current catalog becomes huge. I'm also starting to see a huge performance hit recently. Last night I just changed until 03:30 because LR would take some time as 20 seconds to perform a single task (like changing a slide or photo of the flag). A lot of time spinning beach ball. I have an external hard drive which I support to locally.

  What I was wondering is if I have everything except the most recent project files copy the disk external then keep it unplugged when I WIP edition if it would help performance issues?

  MacBook Pro (10.9.5) and LR CC running. I optimized my catalog and I also have a Cocktail for Mac running on my system to clean the memory, etc.

  Other ideas of huge catalogs management would be useful. I prefer not to make a new catalog for each customer that I shoot several each day and passing backward between catalog every day would be a pain in the thigh.

  Hi KristianWalker,

  Have you tried to increase/purge your Cache? See How to improve and accelerate the performance of Photoshop Lightroom for more ways to optimize Lightroom.

  Also what size is your catalog at the moment?

  Kind regards

  Assani

• Adobe Air performance issues?

  I have recently finished a huge project in Adobe Muse and I love the new sensitive design tools. However, as the project continued to develop, Muse has become increasingly slow to react and interact with the sensitive cursor was almost impossible. As someone who worked for Apple, I'd be the first person to point the finger my Mac and offer to buy a new computer, but it is a new, maxed-out MacBook Pro 15 inches. All other Adobe CC applications work without problem. When Muse was first published, as I remember, it was written on top of the Adobe AIR platform, instead of being natively written in C++. That this has something to do with performance issues that I see? If so, is there something I can do to improve performance, I see?

  Air is not basis for Muse more for a long time. Nativly revised muse was released in early 2014.

  In my view, the Muse team works actively on performance boosts, but I think that we should not expect any miracle: no other application I know not a calculate and display real-time changing dynamically and the same objects interactively from time on endless pages in response.

  In my opinion, the only way to significantly increase the speed would be gray on all goods during the move of the scrubber.

• Is there a performance issue associated with SPARQL property path?

  Is there a performance issue associated with SPARQL property path?

  When we use paths property is our SPARQL queries, the queries never ends. I have a general problem, or do you have a problem with Jena and jena adapter version?

  We run Oracle 12 c. The Jena adapter has version 12.1.0.1.

  Thank you

  By Oyvind

  None of these requests ends. We have 300000 tuples in the model.

  SELECT subclass, superClass

  TABLE (SEM_MATCH)

  "SELECT? subclass? superclass WHERE {? rdfs:subClassOf + subclass? superclass} LIMIT 10'.

  SEM_Models ('isall1_x'),

  NULL, null, null, null,

  (= T, timeout = 100, qid = 123, STRICT_DEFAULT = F'));

  SELECT subclass, superClass

  TABLE (SEM_MATCH)

  "SELECT? subclass? superclass WHERE {graph? g {? subclass rdfs:subClassOf +? superclass}} LIMIT 10'.

  SEM_Models ('isall1_x'),

  NULL, null, null, null,

  (= T, timeout = 100, qid = 123, STRICT_DEFAULT = F'));