Re: Question of color photos JPEG export

Just discovered this problem myself, it of a big disappointment since I work in a studio doing Visual effects and tried to defend the features of After Effects as a tool of great composition of hordes of users Nuke looking down the tip of their nose to After Effects for years.   After trying everything to solve this problem, including scouring bulletin boards and forums without finding a solution to this, I finally got on a chat session with someone from tech at Adobe.  After they me asked to run all the tests that I had already run unsuccessfully, final suggestions for the Adobe agent was this:

"Well maybe can't do after effects; I'm sorry. »


Despite the expertise of this person, I refuse to believe that there is no solution.  But until there is one, I have to make my Photo - Jpeg using Nuke quicktimes, which will probably lead to my finally give up After Effects and pass it once and for all.  I hate to throw away years of experience and to make each AE plug-ins you can name, but if I can't do my job because Adobe can't make them then, that leaves few options.

We fixed a color change with QuickTime PhotoJPEG in the update after effects CC 2015 (13.6):

http://Adobe.LY/1MVxHgX

Try it and let us know how it works for you.

Tags: After Effects

Similar Questions

  • Question of technical Photo-JPEG

    I am doing a project where a client provided me with 400 Photo-JPEG files. (video by stock of Digital Juice). They charge and just fine reading in a sequence that was created by using the sequence button to do.

    A well-informed person told me that I should not use Photo-JPEG and should have converted all the clips in a QT film format (Prores or other). The only restriction that I came across is that the clips do not accept metadata, but it is unnecessary for this edition.

    The time spent making that seemed probibitive, but I just wanted some of the technical experts of the forum to confirm or deny what was told.

    If the sequence of images works, why not use it? As you say, you're unnecessarily spending time converting to another format that may or may not give you direct benefits. It's large forces of Premiere Pro: the ability to import anything and work with it directly, with no required conversion or reversal.

  • Question of color in Lightroom, export not correct color

    Recently on export, the images in the folder are discolored, but when the same image is uploaded in blogstomp and PASS previews are discoloured but the image seen online is correct. So today I downloaded some pictures in my Showit Web site and they have been bleached even online. I have reset to the defaults in the Preferences/presets section, but that did not help... I don't know what is happening.

    You are exporting in ProPhoto and display in a browser without color management. I simulated here in converting the 'good' copy to ProPhoto and assigning sRGB:

    Always export to sRGB for the web (or anything else that has no color management complete). It's in the export dialog under "file settings".

  • Color change with jpeg export

    The color of the exported jpeg image is different from the color of images in Lightroom cc. The image is set to Adobe Standard in Lightroom. I export in sRGB. The exported jpeg image is darker and more saturated. I have a NEC of good quality screen that is regularly calibrated. Operating system is Windows 10.

    What Viewer you use to display the exported JPG file? Microsoft software tends to be less assured than it should be.

  • How I gradually fade one side of a photo jpeg in white?

    How I gradually fade one side of a photo jpeg in white?

    • Create a new layer and move it to the bottom, and then fill this layer with white
    • Select the layer that has your picture on it, and then click the icon at the bottom that looks like a circle within a square. This will create a mask.
    • Click on the new thumbnail that was created on your image layer to select
    • Look at the bottom of your toolbar on the left and see if you have a black and a white color swatch. If they are a shade of gray, press d on the keyboard (if they are of one color other than black or white - e.g. blue and yellow: the thumbnail of the mask was unsuccessful)
    • Click on the gradient in the toolbar on the left (shortcut key g - if the paintcan is enabled in the tool bar, then hold down the SHIFT key when you click the g key)
    • In the upper tool bar on the left side is a gradient, click on the arrow down just to the right of the gradient
    • Select the black and white gradient. third vignette)
    • Now you can drag a gradient across your image - don't forget not black hides the image and watch white image, so white and black are reversed from what you want, you can click on the check box turn in the top toolbar.
    • When your done, click on the thumbnail of the image on your image layer to deselect the mask thumbnail.

    I know it looks like a lot of steps, but once you've done a few times, it's really a quick process. If you have any questions, post a screenshot of photoshop with the Panel layers open.

  • Yellow colors appear dull export, drives me crazy, need help

    When I export a photo from lightroom in JPEG with sRGB color space, I see huge differences mainly yellow colours.

    The photo of sRGB washed yellow which is a huge difference to the development version.

    I have a very basic knowledge of color management and Lightroom and understand the theory of color spaces and that he will always be differences in color because of the conversion from Lightroom (Prophoto with tonecurve of sRGB) in sRGB.

    But what I don't understand is that my yellow in color space sRGB exported look much more washed out and ugly so similair pictures I find on the net. (which are also in the sRGB color space)

    For example, the image below, which includes rich yellow colors in my browser (Firefox4):

    - http://www.Flickr.com/photos/mrsmagic/379546943/sizes/l/in/photostream/

    - http://www.Flickr.com/photos/druclimb/459126182/sizes/z/in/photostream/

    If I compare to my image exported (with saturated colors high in lightroom), I see a huge difference in the yellow color:

    - http://Tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2hfooc4 & s = 7

    What is confusing to me, is that when I open the Flickr images locally in Photosop I see that the yellow GET washed, there, as well (probably because that the PS is color management).

    So I thought that maybe it's the webbrowser (Firefox 4) that incorrectly displays the photos, but then again, why not my photos look so washed out in Firefox4 and other flickr sRGB photos, they also have an sRGB profile... (Firefox4 should be color management).

    In any case I can reproduce these solid yellow colours using Lightroom to export. (IN Lightroom, it seems very well)

    -My screen is calibrated using a spyder3 pro colour. (I do not have a range wide lcd)

    -J' using Lightroom 3.3 for editing and using full export of RAW to JPEG color space sRGB.

    Fands,

    I wouldn't start compared to other photos on flickr with yours, but comparing the view to develop it in LR with sRGB off LR export.

    Issues related to the:

    Compared with the view to develop in LR

    • What looks like a JPEG look exported in Photoshop?
    • What looks like a JPEG look exported in Firefox 4?
    • How an exported JPEG looks in LR, after you import it?

    If they all look the same (more or less) the same, there is no problem with your JPEG export.

    The two images from flickr, you are referring to DOES NOT include any color or same profile tag. So depending on how Firefox 4 manages photos not marked, you might just be looking at their using your profile display or something else (I don't have Firefox 4 installed to discover, in Firefox 3, there are gfx.color_management.display_profile to be specified). In addition, be aware that Firefox 4 (AFAIK) is beta, so bugs should not be ruled out.

    Gossweiler beat

    Switzerland

  • How to keep the transitions of the Apple Photo Jpeg codec

    I made a slideshow a few years ago using iPhoto and exported in the form of film. It uses transitions strongly, especially of crossfades. Now when I try to upload it to a site like vimeo, the video must be converted using a standard codec such as H.264. Once converted, all transitions are lost to the gross final video in comparison.

    Is it possible to convert this video and preserve transitions?

    Format:

    Apple Photo - JPEG, 640 × 480, in Millions

    Apple Photo - JPEG, 640 × 480, in Millions

    Apple Photo - JPEG, 640 × 480, in Millions

    Cross fader, 640 × 480, in Millions

    16-bit integer (Big Endian), Stereo 48,000 kHz

    DV, 720 × 480 (640 × 480), in Millions

    FPS: 0.36

    Data rate: 6852.76 Kbps

    Duration: 0:00:05:15.41

    Normal size: 640 x 480 pixels

    Try to open the file with QuickTime X and must convert the modern use.

  • Canon MX922: Why won't my scanner scan color photos?

    Hello, my Canon MX922 produced copies of any color, but when I scan a color photo, the results of the analysis of a color photo are only in black & white, even when I push the Start button 'color' to scan.  However, the scanner will produce color documents scanned.  Please adivse how/where I need to adjust the settings to produce color photos scanned copies.  Thank you!

    Hello!

    In order to ensure the most accurate information is provided, we will need to know the version of Windows or Mac, in use.

    If it is a time sensitive question, our team of technical assistance to the United States is standing, ready to help you 24/7 by Email http://bit.ly/EmailCanon or by phone at 1-800-OK-CANON (1-800-652-2666) Monday to Friday between 10:00 and 10: 00, et (07:00 to 19:00 PT).

    Thank you and have a great day!

  • person who receives my email windows live photos jpeg can't open them

    Windows xp when emailing windows live photo gallery photos recipient cannot open them

    person who receives my email windows live photos jpeg can not open them. Thank you BL

    Hello meebee43,

    The best place to ask your question of Windows Live is inside Windows Live help forums. Experts specialize in all things, Windows Live, and would be delighted to help you with your questions. Please choose a product below to be redirected to the appropriate community:

    Windows Live Mail

    Windows Live Hotmail

    Windows Live Messenger

    Looking for a different product to Windows Live? Visit the home page Windows Live Help for the complete list of Windows Live forums to www.windowslivehelp.com.

  • Scanning color photos, but get out of black and white

    I am new to scanning - I'm scanning color photo, but it's scanning in black & white.  How it scan in color?

    original title: digitization of color photos

    The following articles might offer something useful:

    Windows Vista - Windows Photo Gallery - scan a picture
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/scan-a-picture

    Windows Vista - scanning: frequently asked questions
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/scanning-frequently-asked-questions

    Scanning in Windows Vista by using Windows Photo Gallery
    http://hpanswers.blogspot.com/2008/07/scanning-in-Windows-Vista-using-Windows.html

    Windows Live Photo Gallery - acquire Photos from a Scanner
    http://www.digitalmediausers.com/tabid/63/default.aspx

    How to scan Photos in Windows Live Photo Gallery
    http://www.Dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-scan-photos-in-Windows-Live-Photo-Gallery.html

  • Hello, I have a Windows 7 Pc, where 5 Lightroom is installed.  When I opened a photo using "verkenner" I see a good color photo.  When I open a photo from Lightroom 5, the picture will be too dark. This gives the difficluties for the shaping of photograph

    Hello

    I have a Windows 7 Pc, where 5 Lightroom is installed.

    When I opened a photo using "verkenner" I see a good color photo.

    When I open a photo from Lightroom 5, the picture will be too dark. This gives struggling during the shaping of the photograph. Can someone help me solve this problem?

    Kind regards

    Marianne

    Hello Marianne,.

    I have something even. JPEGs are fine, naves are a few weeks ago 1.5 stop underexposed. It only happens with LR and Photoshop. Not with Nikon View or Capture. It only happenes when I use the d-lighting option active with one of my Nikon several. Is equivalent to your problem or is there something else?

    Erik

  • color photo can be printed on t-shirts?

    I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question but I hope that there are enough users here with t-shirt printing experience.

    I created a realistic work of photo for printing labels for a customer as a requirement of style. Now they also want this work longer printing on t-shirts and told me they will give him to another designer to vectorize it for this purpose. Technically, the work can be considered a color photo of landscape with a group of people at the front. I'm worried, how the image will look like after this, but from what I've seen impressions t-shirt are for the most part, with some dull colors or rulings art works. I think these are limits and I can't imagine how the work can look at something close to it. I don't have a lot of experience t-shirt but I understand vector vs raster and I don't know if my client knows what they are doing and wonder what you would do if you're in my situation.

    I would greatly appreciate your advice

    [a] color photo can be printed on t-shirts?

    Of course, it can. You can even order have made it one-off measures, online. On clear or dark substrates. Without even properly prepare the image, or even have an idea on how to do it. (My wife does all the time for gifts and arts mechanical and such.)

    .. .a photo realistic illustrations for printing labels for a customer. Now they also want this work longer printing on t-shirts and told me they will give him to another designer to vectorize it for this purpose... I don't have a lot of experience t-shirt but I understand vector vs raster...

    They [the customer]? and maybe even the other designer, do not know what they are talkking about. Contrary to widespread belief, work doesn't have to be "vectorized" in order to print on clothes, more that there must be vector illustrations in order to print on paper. Just like printing on paper, the work must be:

    • .. .the sufficient resolution for the size in which it will be printed.
    • ... color separable, appropriately for the used printing method.

    People talking about garment printing often confuse the concept of 'vector and raster' with "line from continuous tone art." Work of Contone must be 'your projected' (not talking print here) in order to print using color quadri (printing a small number of "primary" colors in a sort of model to simulate other colors).

    Contone work tone control must be done in printing, textile, everything as it should be done in the offset printing on paper. This is true regardless of what printing process is used for printing textiles. For printing directly on the fabric, the work must be the halftone color separation points (or other shapes), or stochastic points or bosses. The same should be done if textile printing is by heat transfer (the transfer must be color separation) or any other method of marking.

    Again, this has nothing to do with the work to be vector or pre-rasterized. It has to do with its continuous tone. You said that the work is "photo realistic". Yet whether vector work; It suggests only that we work continuous tone.

    Technically, the work can be considered a color photo of landscape with a group of people at the front.

    Technically, it's a description quite ambiguous. A picture of a landscape with people? Photo of a landscape color stacked behind some vector drawings of people?

    .. .to go from what I've seen t-shirt prints are for most works with some dull colors or line art screens.

    Then, you need to get out more. Today, you can easily find that t-shirts printed with images of contone printed in a variety of print and the tone of screening methods.

    I think these are limits and I can't imagine how the work can look at something close to it.

    Each printing method has limits. In general, people assume T-shirt silkscreen prints (as in screen printing, printing, but the screens are not silk these days). Screen printing requires generally relatively course tone control (either points of halftones, halftone lines and diffusion dither, dashed), compared to offset printing. And Yes, this is a limitation for offset printing. But it is also one of the reasons why the "requirement" of vector artwork is a myth. A requirement of vector artwork isn't all about resolution independence, contone compared to the line drawings. And the resolution is generally not a problem to print on a T-shirt, something originally designed for offset printing because the resolution requirements are relatively modest.

    Each printing method also has its own advantages. One of the advantages of screen printing is that its use of the printing process is not necessarily limited to only four inks. Another is that the screen printing inks can be opaque; You can actually highlights made impression on top of tones and semitones. That is why it is very bright and very saturated coloring can be done in silkscreen using technical dotted Posterization or taking the place of classic AM or FM your screening. And that is why the best screen printing very frequently creative use these methods instead of regular halftone screening.

    .. .wonder what you would do if you're in my situation...

    If you are looking for advice here, I would like to show a screenshot of the work. As almost always in this forum (or any other like him), best advice very much depends on the nature of the particular work.

    If it was me and my work, I ask the customer which is the company printing the packages he has in mind and then find out if its capabilities to respond to the work and the results expected. If it is not, I would recommend a suitable textile printing company and I would be optimal the work so that he makes me (and charge accordingly).

    JET

  • Problems with Photo JPEG mov

    Hi people,

    I need to edit Photo JPEG and MJPEG files in Quicktime (mov) on Windows 7 format in first Pro CS5. When I play the files from Quicktime player, they play very well, at 1280 x 720. But when I import into first or Adobe Media Encoder, it tells me that they are 160 x 120. If I have more I just get jaggy fuzzy artifacts. In fact, I noticed in Quicktime that they will open by default like 160 x 120, and only when I select "Normal size" they play at 1280 x 720. These files play very well in VLC before even I installed Quicktime.

    No idea why first think they are 160 x 120? How can I get to recognize these files to the appropriate size of 1280 x 720?

    Thank you

    Lyle

    Try MPEG Streamclip for Windows; It is downloadable for free, without installation required.

    Of SBDAs with Streamclip to open, and then select file > save as choose MOV serving of container (should be default) and choose a name/location; Save the file. This will basically copy the video to the first file in a new and correct of the weird questions like this is sometimes useful.

    If it works, you can add all files to a batch (under the menu list) and do the same for each of them. It should be fast because there is no reencoding past, just a repackaging.

  • Print color photos appear under the name of b & w, as soon as I hit

    Color photos are suddenly appear in black and white as soon as I hit 'Print' and print in b & w only!  It is a new issue for me.

    Hello

    1. What is the brand and model of the printer?

    2. have there been recent changes to the computer before the show?

    First of all, make sure that the color cartridge/toner is not empty or blocked.

    I suggest to adjust the color settings in the printing preferences and check if it helps.

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/choosing-print-options

    For your reference: Printer in Windows problems:

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/printer-problems-in-Windows

    Hope this information is useful.

  • scanning color photos come out blank and blach k

    My scanner is an all-in-one photosmart 5520 and when I scan color photo they come out black and white.

    I am a pensioner and not very computer but think it must be something to do with settings, can someone please help. Thanks a lot Shirley01

    You must have somehow set it or choose a mode that is black and white only. How do you scan? Computer or printer with the ' scan to '? If from the computer, which is the type selected? If the printer are you scan a document or photo, pdf, pdf seachable etc? If of course, change the setting and see if the colors come out?

Maybe you are looking for