Relay 2 4410ns with the VLAN

Greetings,

I recently bought 2 4410n APs with the hope to fill some buildings together. Ive found that the APs have a limited support to connect a SSID to a VLAN and AP even accepts traffic marked side wired (obviously, for several virtual local area networks). Howerver, it does not appear that fill 2 tagged APs traffic passes together on the bridge... Miss me something, or APs does not send tagged traffic in the wireless?

Thank you

I think I have it working. on the wireless > VLAN & QoS tab, select "VLAN Tag on WDS.

Tags: Linksys Routers

Similar Questions

Problem with the VLAN routing

I try to put in place several VLAN on a Cisco 3560 switch. These new segments must be able to communicate with the VLAN 1 and even Internet access. I managed to add the VLAN and have network connectivity between the new VLAN. However, these VIRTUAL to VLAN1 networks routing was not working properly. Certainly something is missing or correct in this configuration. It would be much appreciated if someone can shed some light. Thanks in advance.

Basic IP information:
- Gateway 10.1.1.2
- VLAN1: 10.1.1.1/24
- VLAN2: 10.1.2.1/24
- VLAN3: 10.1.3.1/24
What works:
- Hosts in VLAN 1 can ping the DG and access the internet
- LAN 2 and 3 communicate with each other. Hosts in VLAN2 (e.g. 10.1.2.2) can ping hosts in VLAN3 (e.g. 10.1.3.2) on the same switch
- Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 can ping to the IP of VLAN1 (10.1.1.1) interface
What does not work:
- Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 cannot ping hosts in VLAN 1 on the same switch, or vice versa.
- Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 cannot even ping the DG.
Yched blocks my post if I understand the config. I'm sorry that I have to include it as an attachment.

We have no information on the DG - what it is, how it is configured. It is likely:

1. unknown subnet vlan2 and vlan3 ranges. Therefore can not to return packages for them.

2. the default gateway for vlan1 customers is 10.1.1.2, so when customers vlan1 are trying to answer to vlan 2, 3, packets is directed to a DG, which probably ONLY has a default route to the Internet.

3. once it is somehow solved (extra static on DG), Internet for vlan 2.3 will require same NAT rules with respect to the vlan 1.

SWITCH Cisco/Linksys SLM224G: Problem with the VLAN

Hello!

I'm trying to set up a VLAN in my baskets. I have some knowledge about VLANs, but I still can not configure in my path.

My situation:

I have PC that contains two virtual machines, which works as a router between three networks: LAN, WAN, LAN2. It's a bit complicated, but I'll try to draw:
```
                                                 |-------------||----------------------------|                   |           e1|-to-eth1-VM2-----WAN|VirtualMachine 1        eth0|---trunk-VLAN1&2---|g1         e2|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2|eth0=VLAN1 eth1=VLAN2       |                   |           e3|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2 etc.|                         PC |                   |   SWITCH  e4||VirtualMachine 2            |                   |           e5|-to-eth1-VM1---wire-to-LAN2|eth0=VLAN3 eth1=VLAN4   eth1|---trunk-VLAN3&4---|g2         e6|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1|----------------------------|                   |           e7|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1 etc.                                                 |-------------|

gX = Gigabit portseX = 100Mbit portsVMX = Virtual machine numberwire-to = patch-cord connection between ports on the switch

Schema of routing and logical visibility:

LAN1---VM1-----VM2---WAN              |LAN2----------|
```
Important note is that LAN1 and LAN2 must be separated (visible only through routers). WAN must be visible through VM2 to LAN2 and through by VM1 and VM2 to LAN1. It seems easy, but VLAN that I did on this passage seems doesn't work.

I do it like this:

Step 1: Management of VLANS / create a VLAN...

Creation of VLANS 1, 2, 3, 4 (numbers meters right now - I have now this number 1 is restricted to the switch).

Step 2: Management of VLAN / Port to VLAN...

Setting up VLAN1 with ports g1, e5 (the two labelled or not identified?-I have not seen any difference)

Implementation VLAN2 with ports g1, e6, e7, etc...

Implementation VLAN3 with ports g2, e2, e3, etc...

Setting up VLAN4 with g2, e1 ports

Step 3: Management of VLAN / Port setting...

Implementation of ports e1 to PVID4 (chassis type = all I guess, but with "capture filter"?)

Setting up port e2 at PVID3

Setting up port PVID3 e3

etc...

Setting up port e5 for PVID1

Setting up port e6 at PVID2

Setting up port e7 for PVID2

etc...

Thus, on this configuration and that the switch it does not work for me

I know that the switch is to see Mac since VLAN which is carried out by PC, because when I arrive in "Admin / dynamic address" I see pimps on the correct ports, with good VLAN ID. So the problem is to transmit a VLAN for their ports, then clear frames of ID and let the packets to go (and return: clear packages, add the VLAN ID and send to their Gigabit ports).

Show the configuration is one of the many I tried :/ but I think this one is the best.

Or maybe I don't know VLAN as I think and this scheme is impossible? Please tell me.

Concerning

and waiting for any suggestions,

READ

Hello.

These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

* If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

* Do not forget to give a 'congratulations '. Thank you!

Help with the VLAN and RVS4000

I am trying to Setup VLAN on a RVS4000 to share our Internet connection with another office but do not allow access to our network of the other network. We have a BEFSX41 connected to Internet and also connected to our other site via a virtual private network to another BEFSX41. Port 1 on the BEFSX41 connects to Port 1 on an EZXS88W switch.

The other company has provided the RVS4000 and also provides a WRT54GS router. I want to connect 2 ports on the BEFSX41 to Port 1 on the RVS4000 and 2 ports on the RVS4000 to track 1 on the WRT54GS.

Port 1 on the RVS4000 is member of the default VLAN1 and Port 2 will be a member of VLAN2.

Our IP network is 192.168.20.0/24

BEFSX41 is 192.168.20.1

The DHCP service is disabled

The RVS4000 has a static IP address of 192.168.20.254 and is configured as a router

DHCP is also disabled

The wireless network is as follows:

IP network is 192.168.21.0/24

The address IP of WRT54GS is 192.168.21.254 and is static and also configured as a router.

I don't know how to actually Setup the VLAN from here and the instructions are not useful. My questions are:

1 port 1 on the RVS4000 must be safe, with label or Untagged?

2 If the interval routing disabled?

3. If so, how do I route between the RVS4000 and WRIGHT so the two networks have access to the Internet, but not to other networks?

The befsx41 should be one that is connected to the internet so that your final point so that the vpn tunnel work. The wan port on the wrt54g must be connected to the lan of the befsx41 port.

If your server is located behind the befsx41, you should be able to port forwarding. If your server is located behind the wrt54g you may experience the problem with the redirect because you need to forward ports on both routers and according to me, there are some applications that do not work on double NAT.

If you want to have access to the internet on both VLAN of the rvs4000, it should work as a router so its internet port must be connected to the port the befsx41 lan.

Help with the VLAN routing

I'm pretty green when I just went and routing configurations please bear with me. I'm available what I want to achieve and what I could do until now (although it may be completely wrong).

I have an office where we run low on IP addresses for our local network, the obvious answer is to get VOIP phones on their own subnet. So, I have a switch PC6224 I want to use to create the second subnet.

Existing Workstation LAN = 172.22.144.0 (255.255.255.0)

Default GW for the LAN = 172.22.144.1 for all devices on that subnet

I would like to create an IPPhone = 172.22.145.0 (255.255.255.0) subnet

Here's what I have "Achieved" so far:

Currently, I can ping from a client on 172.22.145.x to the 172.22.144.12 (VLAN 3 ip interface) but cannot ping any other 172.22.144.x that is not directly connected to the 6224 switch device. Trying to ping the network 172.22.145.x device leave a device plugged into the 172.22.144.x VLAN on the switch of packets results was sent to the default gateway for the network (172.22.144.1) who does not know what to do with them.

Here is my config of 6224 switch operation:

Console execution #show
! Current configuration:
! Description of the system "PowerConnect 6224, 3.3.6.4, VxWorks 6.5.
! 3.3.6.4 system software version
! Passage mode is configured as disabled
!
Configure
database of VLAN
VLAN 2-3
VLAN 2 1 routing
VLAN 3 2 routing
subnet of VLAN association 172.22.144.0 255.255.255.0 3
subnet of VLAN association 172.22.145.0 255.255.255.0 2
output
battery
1 1 member
output
IP address no
IP routing
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.22.144.1
interface vlan 2
name "IPPhone.
Routing
IP 172.22.145.1 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 3
name "TWLAN".
Routing
IP 172.22.144.12 255.255.255.0
output
level of 746f7a78621059d80fdc538acc40cbf2 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
!
interface ethernet 1/g3
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g4
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g5
switchport access vlan 2
output

!
interface ethernet 1/g6
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g7
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g8
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g9
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g10
switchport access vlan 2
output
!

interface ethernet 1/g11
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g12
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g13
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g14
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g15
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g16

switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g17
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g18
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g19
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g20
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g21
switchport access vlan 2

output
!
interface ethernet 1/g22
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g23
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g24
switchport access vlan 2
output
output

Console #.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Grant

What port connects to 172.22.144.1 the jump according to the internet?

What should happen is we need a VLAN 'remote' separate just for the connection between the 6224 and your 172.22.144.1 jump following the internet device.

If 172.22.144.1 remains the same, then you must create another local network VIRTUAL to "TWLAN". Eventually, VLAN 4 with a range of ip addresses of 172.22.146.1 - 254 255.255.255.0. Where the VLAN 4 interface has an IP address defined as 172.22.146.1. Once that all connected devices again VLAN 4 that were in the VLAN 3 need to change there IPs and gateway 172.22.146.1

So the only port that has configuration of VLAN 3 is the connection to 172.22.144.1 port next to the internet break. The IP address defined on the interface VLAN 3 should be in the same subnet as 172.22.144.1 range.

Here is a diagram that can help you to see the whole upward. VLAN 100 in the diagram represent VLAN 3 in your case. Switch 2 would represent your device from the internet of next hop.

Help with the VLAN on SG200-18 and two switches SG200-08

Hello world. My apologies, but I'm only average at best with my CISCO skills. I have simple installation running some network devices connected via 3 CISCO switches. It is small office and two bedrooms - one with the servers and the other with the printer and pc. Each room has 8 ports SG200-08 pass.

Router / firewall is Sonicwall TZ215 and manages the internal routing between VIRTUAL networks. Each SG200-08 was directly connected to TZ215 (no SG200-18 again) and VLAN worked perfectly. Please see diagram below...

Problems started when I added in the Center SG200-18 more to handle additional devices. Everything that I'm doing wrong, but I can't do VLAN longer works. Something I won't set up correctly in SG200-18.

Please help me to Setup VLAN here - tag, unidentified, PVID, trunk... I am completely lost and already had to reset SG200-18 twice.

My work without port switch 18 Setup was like that.

SG200-08 (1)
G1 1 trunk 1U, 100 t
G2 1 trunk 1U
G3 1 trunk 1U
G4 1 trunk 1U
G5 1 trunk 1U
G6 1 trunk 1U SERVER3
G7 trunk 100 100U SERVER1
G8 trunk 100 100U Server2

SG200-08 (2)
G1 1 trunk 1U, 50 t, 200 t
G2 1 trunk 1U
G3 1 trunk 1U
G4 1 trunk 1U PC1A
G5 1 trunk 1U PC1B
G6 trunk 50 50U PC2A
Trunk PC2B 50 50U G7
NETWORK PRINTER for the 200 trunk 200U G8

Thank you in advance.

VLAN.jpg

Hello

Oh I'm sorry. I understand that you have 3xSG200-08 and 2 of them with the same configuration :-). So no need to use this port for now.

Kind regards

Aleksandra

2910al - 48G Switch: problem with the VLAN

Hi all,

I write a new message because I don't know what is happening on my SW series 2910al - 48G and v1910 - 48G.

I put on the main core SW VLAN 610 and I put to this VLAN IP addreess 100.110.10.1 24-bit etc and it worked fine until yesterday. I change only PLEASE and I enebale STP - loop protect for ports in the range 1-52. (now I rolback this settings as was before)

STP configuration

Now, every PC that has for a long time what IP range 100.110.10.1 24-bit works fine, but new PC have problem with to get the new IP address. I tested it add a static and same address does not work.

Introduced in second v1910 SW - 48 G VLAN as below

I connect this flexible switch this \port SW 2910 - G 48, 46 (Vlan 610 tag) <>- at v1910-48G\ port 50 SW (Vlan 610 tahgged) other ports on this switch I put not marked.

Configuration file for sw v1910 - 48G looks to below:

#
activate default domain system
#
LLDP enable

#
domain system
disable the access limit
Active state
Disable Idle-cut
self-service-url disable

#
rstp STP mode
enable STP
#
NULL0 interface
#
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
hybrid type port link
port hybrid vlan tagged 610 620
untagged port hybrid vlan 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/3
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/6
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/7
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/8
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/9
access port vlan 610
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/10
access port vlan 610
#

#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/49
hybrid type port link
port hybrid vlan tagged 610 620
port hybrid vlan 1 10 untagged
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/50
hybrid type port link
port hybrid vlan tagged 610 620
port hybrid vlan 1 10 untagged
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/51
hybrid type port link
port hybrid vlan tagged 610 620
untagged port hybrid vlan 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/52
hybrid type port link
port hybrid vlan tagged 610 620
untagged port hybrid vlan 1

etc...

Could you help me when I made a mistake?

THX

The problem was that solve this problem.

I have blocked all ports. It was a problem. I change several settings and everything works well.

Trouble with the voice and data Vlan vlan translate between CT3905 and SF300 - 24 p

Hey actually, we have the solution to monitoring of implementation with CT3905 phone, SF300 - switches 24 p cameras and AIR-AP1041N Access Points

We have the problem with the vlan tag in SF300 switch ports - 24 p we can´t tag vlan of the voice and data VLANs on the same port on SF300 - 24 p it is Possible or we must dedicate a port for each VLAN or ussing the same data segment of VLANs and vlan voice?

Someone has an answer or technical documentation that can help us

Best regards

First of all,

Please disable lldp transmit in SF 300 switch.

The command is "no lldp transmitted."

After you disable check the following steps.

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-27005

facing the same problem with cisco SG 300 and 3905 ip phone switch.

And nested thing was my 7945 and 6941 phones use to work properly, without above configuration.

Cisco 3905 became not vlan Ip address votes and even if I put static, it did not work.

After a long struggle, I was able to solve the problem. Now both phone and system work fine in the same port.

Samantha

Configuration of VLAN 6248 - link IP subnet to the VLAN

We have 200 node network with no VLAN (small private company that developed quickly)

All nodes / devices / etc. of PCs spread evenly over 6 Dell 5448 switches with no regard for the Department, location or usage.

(1) L3 is 6248 - we've added 6248 route VLANs (everything is on VLAN 1 still - i.e. without marking)

(2) L2 several VLANS by switch - the best of cases, 2 VLANS by 5448

(3) trunk / general uplink L2 s 5448 using LAG (44, 45 ports) - should be labelled all traffic, but since it will be a conversion / migration on an e-commerce network 24 x 7, we thought that we would have to do uplink between 5548 s and 6248 General and changes to the trunk later

(4) for the conversion, all uplinks of trunk/general will have several VLANs marked as vlan1 untagged traffic

(5) we know fixed us every VLAN gateway IP to the IP address of 6248 maintenance the VLAN, but can't decide how to proceed with no one-to-one correspondence of VLAN LAG uplink

Questions on 6248

Q1: we would use "bind the IP subnet to the VLAN ' the 6248 to configure routing between VLANS or do we define the belonging to a VLAN by LAG?

Q2: would we be able to ping the IP of the bridge VLAN configured in the 6248 a down host link / node / PC marked for the same VLAN?

Any suggestions would be most appreciated.

On the 6248 allowing to the VLAN routing you must just ensure each VLAN has an IP address assigned to it:

Console (config) #interface vlan 5

Console (config - vlan) #ip address 192.105.1.1 255.255.255.0

Then enable routing on the switch:

Console (config) #ip Routing

That's all that needs to be configured on the 6248 for VLAN routing to work. One thing to take steps, is that on the 6248 the management VLAN is not routable. By default, the management VLAN is VLAN 1. Two options are to move the management VLAN a VLAN different:

Console # configure

Console (config) #ip address vlan 99

Or not use VLAN 1 at all. Place traffic on other VLANs.

The answer to your second question is Yes. With the VLAN routing enabled a customer to any what VLAN should be able to ping the gateway of the 6248.

When it comes to generals and trunk mode. General mode is like a combination of access and trunk, you can send several VLANS not identified. General mode is most commonly used on the 6200 switches when connecting with the new switches, trunk sometimes doesn't connect when it is connected to a most recent switch. I suggest using the general mode on the 6248 and if it works, leave it in general mode.

Here is a list of various white papers which all have some good info to have.

http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/networking/w/wiki/2580.networking-whitepapers.aspx

6248 user's Guide

FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_User%27s%20Guide2_en-us.PDF

6248 cli guide

FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

5548 user's Guide

FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524p_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.PDF

5548 cli guide

FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

Having to update firmware of the switch can help with interoperability.

6248

http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-6248/drivers

5548

http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-5548/drivers

See you soon

How create VLAN (12,14,15) on switch S5000 and it should communicate with all the VLANS?

I have a server blade and s5000 620 switch (16 servers with NIC 10gig), I want to create three different VLAN's (12--> 192.168.12.1,15--> 192.168.15.1,192.168.8.1) and I want to assign VALN ip to the Server Blade, please help me on this configuration

Here is an article that guides you through the controls to create a VLAN and assign an interface to this VLAN.

http://Dell.to/2dlz74E

And here's a video of assignment of an IP address on the VLANs.

http://bit.LY/1Kgcs8e

Hope that these will help you get the configured switch.

VLAN Management with the 1000V and UCS

If I want to use 10 VLAN management, to configure the following:

1000V - VM vEthernet port profile coelio with VLAN 10, Ethernet uplink profile includes 10 VLANS

UCS - vNIC in the Service profile, VLAN 10 and include the UCS uplink trunk VLAN 10

Switch upstream: include 10 VLANS in trunk port.

Ok?

Now, this management VLAN, I then jeutiliser can for everything? I mean to 1000V management VLAN, vSPhere management, management FI and switch? For example management of 1000V or different from others?

Hi Atle,

Yes, is that what you mentioned, it's good in terms of activities you need to perform. However, I wish to add a few:

(1) define him vlan on the UCS - except if you do this, that you won't be able to add to the vnic. More once you have set the vlan automatiaclly will get added to the list of trunk on uplink ports (unless you l2-disjoint set up)

You can have the same vlan for all management, unless you have some traffic that you would not want some devices to see / meet.

. / Afonso

Channel Port LACP with VMWare ESXi IP hash Message: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: < MAC > host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port

Hello

Currently I have a VMWare ESXi host with 2 network including 6 cards (3 of each) ports are connected to a X 3750. I configured LACP on the switch and the Port of vDS group road based on IP Hash (802.3ad), my looks of config as follows:-

src-dst-ip port-channel load-balance

Interface Port-channel15

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

priority queue

MLS qos trust dscp

spanning tree portfast

channel-protocol lacp

active in mode channel-group 15

Currently I see many MAC beat in the log of the switch. From my understanding, I expect the MAC address out all ports, because that's what'd ESXi when you use 'route based on the hash of the IP. I'm worried about the impact this might have on the CPU / switch.

August 6, 09:42:05.700 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.0939 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/16 and article gi1/0/15

August 6, 09:42:16.479 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.28e4 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/20 and 0/article gi1/17

August 6, 09:42:18.719 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.7f6a to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/19 and article gi1/0/20

August 6, 09:42:20.766 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.0939 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/16 and article gi1/0/15

Is it by design, if so can I disable the message? If this isn't the case, please can you advise where I can check/change the configuration?

Thank you

Peter

It is really gud who... .you mentioned your solution here.

Can you please mark this question as answered, thatâ so it can help the other guys.

Concerning

Please rate if this can help.

Communication between 2 SG300 - 28 p with an OFFSET of the VLAN

Hello

I have 2 SG300 - 28 p without a router used for the use of the backbone.

The switches are configured in L2.

I want to configure on the two switches:
- The default VLAN Id 90
- A VLAN with 80 Id to access databases
- A VLAN Id 70 to access the backup server
- An agregate with port 25, 26, 27, 28
- The ports 1 to 8, 13 and 20 with VLAN 80 (90UP/80 t)
- 9 to 12 ports, 21 to 24 with VLAN 70 (70UP)
Computers that connect to the VLAN 70 won't be intended for the VLAN 70.

I would like to use the mode of access ports in VLAN 70.

Computers that connect to the VLAN 80 will not be intended for 80 of VLAN.

It seems that servers on the local network VIRTUAL 80 switch 1 can communicate with servers on the 80 VLAN on switch 2.

My problem is that the servers on the VLAN switch 70 1 access to the servers on VLAN 70 on switch 2.

I guess it is because the 90UP of LAG 25/26/27/28 configured.

Any idea to solve this problem?

The OFFSET is like any other link. It is configurable. You should be able to connect to the CLI

config t

PO1 int

switchport mode trunk

switchport trunk vlan native 90

switchport trunk allowed vlan add 70,80

-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages

SG300-28 - Firmware 1.2.7.76 with the MAC: how to use the VLAN? (Bugs00131469)

Hallo,

can you please explain to me this problem more in detail, please:

##################################################################

Problem: When a port Transceiver allowed tent of to re-authenticate and RADIUS

attributes no longer target attributes VLAN, re-authentication breaks down and the

port must become unauthorized. This is not the case, and the port is not.

(Bugs00131469)

Solution: Do not delete attributes of VLANS on a RADIUS server or unplug

network cable and plug it in again to force the failure.

##################################################################

I use an assignment VLAN dynamic for my known hosts of the network (authentication MAC) based only. But there are people from other companies who use their own computer and this computer does not know on my RADIUS server. These people should use the VLAN comments. In general they disconnect the LAN cable from a host that is known on my SHELF and put the LAN cable into their laptop (which is not known by the RADIUS server).

Does this mean that this port will remain in the VLAN old or the switch will change the port the the guest VLAN?

And what happens if I reconnect the computer to know about this port?

This feature is very important to me, but I need the functionality of the new firmware RADIUS accounting. So please give me some advice!

Thank you very much!

Alexander Wilke

Hello, Alexander.

When connecting to an unknown host to the switch, it should go to a VLAN authenticated or if you use the VLAN comments, it must be created statically a VLAN on the switch. With the comments-VLAN-Enable, the switch automatically assigns a port as a member not marked. When the port is allowed, the switch will have to move the port to VLAN comments when the first applicant authorizes.

Basically, this bug listed above says not to make changes to your information RADIUS server of VLAN and if you do, unplug the network and reconnect it.

-Tom

RV220W works only with the PPTP server on one VLAN only

Hello

I have a RV220W (firmware 1.0.3.5) but I can't seem to work with the PPTP server on one VLAN only.

My default VLAN is in 192.168.1.1/24.

I created a VLAN ID 10 in 192.168.50.1/24 inter - vlan routing: disabled and device management: disabled.

(Menu network > LAN > belonging to a VLAN and multiple VIRTUAL local network subnets).

Then I configured a PPTP server on the IP 192.168.50.200 to 192.168.50.210 range.

Finally, I created my user.

(Menu VPN > IPSEC > VPN users).

The PPTP tunnel is at work, but on all of my local network and not only the VLAN ID 10.

Any idea? ...

This seems to be a limitation of the firmware 1.0.3.5. Firmware 1.0.4.x will support the rules on access inter - VLAN, which I hope, can be used to restrict traffic VLAN by default your VLAN ID 10.

Relay 2 4410ns with the VLAN

Similar Questions

VLAN.jpg

Maybe you are looking for