remote access to the unit errors

Unity 6,0000 UH, with Exhchange 5.5, CCM 3.3 (4)

Having a problem trying to access the Web unit of Terminal Server page - the error is: Server.CreateObject (AvSaLocalization.AvSaLocalization.1) has failed.

This is most likely an error with a DLL, probably AvSaLocalizationSvr.dll or perhaps AvSaLocaleInfoSvr.dll.

Verify that these files are present and registered with REGSVR32.

Also make sure that the appropriate MsgStoreRes.dll file is present.

Cannot continue.

(From: SaLocalizationInc.asp #1).

This message appears in the browser window, can someone help me to look into this, thank you.

For fun, because he was working... and it is not now...

Restart your ISS services on this machine...

still does not work, try another machine...

Otherwise... it doesn't hurt to do a regsvr32 dll files...

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • AppPortal error: remote access to the server is not enabled

    I'm lost on this one.

    Using the full client of AppPortal on a Win7 64 bit machine (version 8.0 of the customer)

    Double-click the icon, download authenticated - published applications show, then double click a published application, the end user receives:

    Remote access to the server is not enabled.

    This happens only on a single computer

    From this profile of users on the given computer I can MSTSC on the same server without problem

    The error also follows the profiles on the given computer.

    I have closed the Antivirus and Windows Firewall and still can not get this to work.

    Even uninstalled and reinstalled the client.

    From my computer, I can easily log in as this user.

    Customers get automatically configured through an XML file.

    After installation, I tested this laptop and he always gave the same error.

    I ended up him to give me the phone for a few hours.

    Uninstalled the version that was there (build 8.0.0.forget) and scoured the Windows Explorer for all left overs (a little here and there in user profiles and delete).

    Then scoured the registry for expressions; vWorkspace, Quest Software and Provision Networks and remove all instances

    Reinstalled all THE SUCCESS with the new connector to our servers (8.0.306.1427)

    Thanks for the help Dave

  • Access to the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE error

    Hello

    people 8.42.15, CRM88 Oracle on a Win 2003 Server tools
    When loging as sysadm via SQLPLUS, I have the following error:
    C:\Documents and Settings > sqlplus sysadm/s*@MYDB

    SQL * more: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production Wed Nov 26 16:00:54 2008

    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.

    Access to the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE error
    WARNING: Product user profile information has not loaded!
    You may need to run PUPBLD. SQL as SYSTEM

    Connected to:
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.7.0 - Production
    With partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
    Release 9.2.0.7.0 - Production jserver

    Any idea? I thank.

    Run the Oracle script %ORACLE_HOME%\sqlplus\admin\pupbld.sql

    Nicolas.

  • The Routing and remote access could not start, error 214500037 (0x80004005)

    My windows server 2003 r2, failed to start the Routing and remote access services. And in the event an observer log, it has error code
    Event ID: 7024, with service specific error 2147500037 (0x80004005)
    I tried to reset tcp/ip and replace ias.mdb and dnary.mdb by a new, but it did not work.

    Thank you

    Hi budhihartono,

    Since you are facing problems with windows server 2003 r2, it would be better suited in the Technet Windows forum. Please post your question in the following TechNet Windows server forum to improve assistance:

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

  • Static IP remote access for the media center

    I NMH410 work through a WRT610N router.   My ports are configured for static IP access.  Seems to just going through www.ciscomediahub.com does not work well for me.

    Can someone provide the 'exact' URL I would enter in order to access my media center?

    Documentation of assistance through Cisco shows: https://Wan_IP_Address but that doesn't seem to work.  The demand is just there and finally once outside.

    To everyone:

    Apparently, I discovered and corrected the problem that I had with 'Remote access' to my Media Hub.

    Somehow, there are two configurations of router that had to be done.  On two port forwarding configurations has been necessary and once allowed me to access the media center.

    It seems that my ISP has a 192.168.x.x address router that was different from the address of my router 192.168.x.x.  It is on the home router when I incoming and make changes to the information of port forwarding.  The fact that I was getting an error message indicating that I wasn't even reached my router alerted me to the fact that my ISP was blocking remote access.  In the end, that's where my problem was discovered.

    Translate:

    If you have problems to access your media "at a distance" pole through its IP address (and not by the cisco media center), make sure that you configure the ports of the router specified by your Internet provider address, as well as the ports of the router that you have on your network home.

    I have forwarded port 443 on the two addresses of router port, and I can now access my media hub remotely.  Now if I can't play videos remotely, I'll be set.  This leads to another problem that I'll send it in another thread.

    Thanks for the help and suggestions of each.

  • Remote access to the site to site VPN

    We currently have a VPN site-to-site set up on a direct line between our two data centers. Hosts on site one can speak to guests at site B, and talk to the hosts to site A to site B guests.

    I've recently implemented a site A. VPN VPN remote access clients can access all of the resources behind the ASA at A site without problem. However, strange things happen when they try to contact the site B.

    I have set up corresponding exemptions of NAT on each side of the connection. The remote site reported no abnormalities. When you attempt to connect to a remote VPN client to site B, the only errors that appear are on the SAA to site A. When a remote client attempts to connect to a host at site B, the following errors appear in the log:

    % ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for tcp src outside:10.3.0.1/60851 dst ds3:10.0.1.42/22

    I have the exemption following NAT set up on site A:

    access-list sheep; 3 items

    access-list 1 permit line sheep extended ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    allowed to Access-list sheep lengthened 2 ip line 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    allowed to Access-list sheep line 3 extended ip 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    I work on it for a few days now and hesitate to open a ticket of TAC. I've seen a few similar questions on the forums, but have found zero with a working solution. I tried to follow the technical notes on Cisco's Web site for a configuration similar to, but had no luck.

    Also, I enabled same-security-traffic on intra and inter-interface interface.

    Any help would be appreciated.

    HUB of the ASA, is this your topology? If so try below suggestions.

    Inside 10.1.1.0/16 Net

    Net 172.16.0.0/28 - net through Tunnel L2L 10.0.0.0/16 end DS3

    VPN RA Net 10.3.0.0/24

    To RA to access the L2L tunnel end hosting you will need to exempt sheep rule applied to the ds3 interface.

    based on the journal

    % ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for tcp src outside:10.3.0.1/60851 dst ds3:10.0.1.42/22

    Try this

    no scope list ip 10.3.0.0 access test allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0

    test the ip 10.0.0.0 allowed extended access list 255.255.0.0 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0

    test access list 0 Tan (ds3)

    on the end of the tunnel (spoke), to allow the network of RA from the FOCUS of the ASA in the interesting traffic.

    Let us know how it works

    Concerning

  • No remote access to the admin page local account mynetgear

    I used happily log into my RN10200 remote and access to everything, including the local administration page. Who has been using ReadyCloud, i.e. before the access of the Web page without hope we get using mynetgear. Page Web tells me that it is no longer accessible on the same network?

    It's pretty useless, because I want to manage my remote NAS box as well!

    I want my access admin back please!

    I would add that I always get very happy fully my ReadyNAS Duo ReadyNAS Remote, even the admin page via. This makes me wonder why I got a downgrade from my accessibility on a new product?

    The images worked and I saw them, they just had not been approved yet (just fixed).

    Have you tried to download the ReadyCLOUD application using a different web browser?

  • Routing and remote access to the Server 2003

    I configured the remote access and routing service in my Server 2003 duly NAT enabled. All my clients are not in the field. All use internet and intranet connection using my proxy authentication provided by the administrator of the proxy server. I would like to restrict the clients except intranet connection. How to limit the customer?

    Post in the Windows Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

  • Remote access via the internet between Windows 7 PCs and a Windows 7 Pro and a Windows PC Vista Home

    I am running Windows 7 Professional on a laptop Dell Studio 1569 (64-bit). I want remote access to one Dell Inspiron, Windows 7 family, but also an another Dell Inspiron running Windows Vista Home edition, via an IP connection over the internet. I can do this and if so, how? I used GoToMeeting.com, but I hope that I can avoid paying their connecting directly. Thanks in advance.

    Take a look at TeamViewer. Boulder computer Maven

  • The unit - error message

    After installing the 4.0 unit (4) SR1, I loose any all users, but I'm looking for a way to disable greeting error for all users.

    If I disable the message error home either through the SA or the Advanced Settings tool, the appellant will be disconnected if an invalid entry is detected during greeting subscribers. Not sure if this is a bug, but I can't find one in the browser Bug.

    The installation of the last unit that I did I had to manually open all subscribers error greetings and put them to loop back to their own greetings. It is very time consuming.

    Is there a way to disable the error message home w/o disconnection to the appellant or to make a big change to all subscribers greetings from error to have looped to the own greeting subscribers instead of opening of wishes?

    Thank you

    -Ryan

    You can't disable the greeting of the error. He must be active to treat the error handling.

    BulkEdit has a special option just for what you want (the option "loop back to itself") - you can easily remap everyone greeting error loop on itself in a single shot.

  • Easy access of the unit

    Hoi,

    Currently working on a solution to make available to users of GSM unit. It's partly resolved using aliases directory with the unit numbers.

    Is it possible to disable the password only prompt for GSM users and when they dialin directly to their Inbox vm to enter in this box?

    This function calls easy access? As I do not understand this feature

    No, currently if the password is set it will always ask for him few matter where you call out.

    The simple sign is if you listen to your greeting message (i.e. you are dialing your own DID and transferred to voicemail), it assumes that it is the use and request only your PW when you select * to connect, it is not also make you enter your login ID.

  • Lost remote access to the internal network after upgarding PIX to 7.0

    I improved our box of PIX 515E Cisco to release 6.3 7.0 (5) and lost connectivity outside of the internal servers through a VPN connection. Any ideas as to why or how this happened?

    If you use the split tunneling, this is probably the question.

    Is the bug id: CSCeh69389

    This Bug says:

    When you upgrade a PIX 6.x to 7.0, if split tunneling is underway

    used for remote access clients, then the conversion of config

    process will not convert the list of split tunnel command, because

    the ACL of splitting 6.x tunnel was allowed to be of type 'expanded '.

    whereas in 7.0 the ACL must be ' standard '.

    To solve the problem, take the extended ACL and manually convert it to a

    Standard ACL, specifying the networks you want encrypted. Times

    the new ACL is in the config, it must be applied under the

    Group Policy.

    EX:

    SplitTunnel list standard access allowed 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

    internal RemoteAccess group strategy

    Group Policy attributes RemoteAccess

    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

    value of Split-tunnel-network-list SplitTunnel

  • Remote access to the apex applications

    Hi all

    I I find a way to allow access to applications apex of remote machines in my local network. Local access works very well. I need allow users to access their customers-browser web applications by using the URL as http://lugao-pc:8282 / apex. I use Apex 4.1.1 in Oracle 11 g 2, using Embedded PL/SQL gateway

    I've seen other posts that say remote HTTP connection allow the database using DBMS_XDB EXEC. SETLISTENERLOCALACCESS (false); in SQLPlus as SYSDBA. But that doesn't did not help me. I think it is because I use the PL/SQL no Oracle HTTP Server gateway. If am not wrong how do I allow remote access using existing installation?

    Concerning

    Sadik

    Hello

    You must run DBMS_XDB EXEC. SETLISTENERLOCALACCESS (FALSE); If you use Embed PL/SQL gateway.
    If you want to use another HTTP server then it is useless.

    Did you try to turn your firewall server to and see works the connection then?

    Kind regards
    Jari
    -----
    My Blog: http://dbswh.webhop.net/htmldb/f?p=BLOG:HOME:0
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jariolai

  • & quot; Security for access to the url error & quot;

    Hello
    I have two problems,
    an I get error of scripts cross-domain as indicated in the title of the message is to say "security to access the url error.
    I tried to access using webserice and http service requesta and a web service request. I kept getting the same error. I tried to put the crossdomain.xml file in the root of the server and he had no luck either. Any suggestions would be helpful.
    one of the operations in the wsdl file is called getlookupvalues, and it takes 4 parameters, database, username, password and lookupid. the lookupID is a GUID.
    When I tried to create a request to getlookupvalues with the above parameters that it kept giving me compile erros saying incompatible correlation of type guid and string. Think is because I am past the guid as a string. A way to pass a guid as a guid instead of a string?

    Thank you very much

    Aerts

    Sort the cross-domain problem using mx:Webservice, and not a httpservice.

  • Instruments GPIB remote access through the GPIBConf device names

    Hello

    I am trying to run the Labwindows 2009 SP1 code on a PC based office while trying to exploit the GPIB instruments

    on another part of the network.

    Normally, this isn't problem with VISA server on the target computer and the use of names of Alias VISA within the

    Office PC code.

    But this code was inherited and uses a different method which has been the best over time.

    The code uses device name strings that have been defined using the GPIB utility: GpibConfig.exe,.

    on the target computer. So when a device is first initialized, the name defined in the GPIB utility is used

    by the code and the associate instrument access are reached. It works fine when the code and

    the instruments are located on the same PC.

    My question: is there some way I can use VISA access server remote GPIB instruments help

    defined names on the computer target with the GpibConfig.exe utility?

    Thank you

    Gary.

    The low-level GPIB functions have no knowledge functions VISA or aliases. This must be a very old application since the VISA has been around for 10 years. Have you always the source code so you can change your GPIB for VISA?

Maybe you are looking for