Routing and remote access to the Server 2003

Similar Questions

• Routing and remote access - on three subnetworked, two subnet unable to reach to the internet!

  Hello

  Good evening everyone.

  I had a problem in Routing and remote access on windows 2003 server.  This server is already configured as a file server, domain server, and application server. Also configured as a router (thanks to access routing & remote) to connect the three different networks with each other. If this server has three NICs installed and each separate NIC network cards represent.

  three different networks are - 192.42.160.0/24, 192.42.161.0/24, 192.42.162.0/24

  Three cards of the NETWORK adapter installed on the server as with the IP - next

  NIC - 1 = 192.42.160.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  NIC - 2 = 192.42.161.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - 192.161.220.112 (this ip address for internet access then 4 g router IP)

  -3 = 192.42.162.220, NETWORK cards, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  Now the question is I can get Internet & (also scathing in router ip 192.42.161.112) one network i.e. - 192.42.161.0/24, BUT when I try to access the internet from another two network (192.42.160.0/24 & 192.42.162.0/24) I can not access and in addition can not ping to internet router ip - 192.42.161.112...

  So, how do I access the internet to another two network also?

  I was already the configuration of static routing for all three network but I wasn't always successful. I don't really know what exactly static routing this should be done in access routing & remote area so that all three network can reach to the internet?

  Here is the result of the current track...

  D:\Documents and Settings\Administrateur > route print

  IPv4 routing table
  ===========================================================================
  List of the interface
  0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
  0x2... 00 30 05 8f ad 5 c... Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet - Mi Teefer2
  niport
  0 x 3... 0E 00 c4 f8 a7 0c... Network Intel(r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter - Teefer2 M
  iniport
  0 x 4... 0E 00 0c a7 c5 85... Intel (r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter #2 - Teefer
  2 miniport
  ===========================================================================
  ===========================================================================
  Active routes:
  Network Destination gateway metric Interface subnet mask
  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.42.161.112 192.42.161.220 1
  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
  192.42.160.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.160.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.160.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.161.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.161.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.161.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.162.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  192.42.162.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.162.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 1
  Default gateway: 192.42.161.112
  ===========================================================================
  Persistent routes:
  None

  Sorry if I'm not able to explain properly. Please let me know if you have to explain more about it...

  Thank you all.

  Mahesh

  Hello Manu,

  Please post this question in the forums TechNet for Windows Server 2003. They will be able to guide you further.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• The Routing and remote access could not start, error 214500037 (0x80004005)

  My windows server 2003 r2, failed to start the Routing and remote access services. And in the event an observer log, it has error code
  Event ID: 7024, with service specific error 2147500037 (0x80004005)
  I tried to reset tcp/ip and replace ias.mdb and dnary.mdb by a new, but it did not work.

  Thank you

  Hi budhihartono,

  Since you are facing problems with windows server 2003 r2, it would be better suited in the Technet Windows forum. Please post your question in the following TechNet Windows server forum to improve assistance:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• AppPortal error: remote access to the server is not enabled

  I'm lost on this one.

  Using the full client of AppPortal on a Win7 64 bit machine (version 8.0 of the customer)

  Double-click the icon, download authenticated - published applications show, then double click a published application, the end user receives:

  Remote access to the server is not enabled.

  This happens only on a single computer

  From this profile of users on the given computer I can MSTSC on the same server without problem

  The error also follows the profiles on the given computer.

  I have closed the Antivirus and Windows Firewall and still can not get this to work.

  Even uninstalled and reinstalled the client.

  From my computer, I can easily log in as this user.

  Customers get automatically configured through an XML file.

  After installation, I tested this laptop and he always gave the same error.

  I ended up him to give me the phone for a few hours.

  Uninstalled the version that was there (build 8.0.0.forget) and scoured the Windows Explorer for all left overs (a little here and there in user profiles and delete).

  Then scoured the registry for expressions; vWorkspace, Quest Software and Provision Networks and remove all instances

  Reinstalled all THE SUCCESS with the new connector to our servers (8.0.306.1427)

  Thanks for the help Dave

• Routing and Remote Access Server & VPN

  We have Server Windows 2008 R2, which is our domain, but also DHCP server controller. On this server we have Setup RRA for VPN and it works fine. We had to stop our DC due to a failure and after I got the domain controller to the top and it is a problem for users that connect to the VPN.

  When users try to connect to the VPN, it connects successfully. But they did not access network as usual. I looked in the VPN properties, and it receives an IP address of 169.254.xxx.xx which is not the correct network IP address. So while the user who is remote think they are connected, they are currently not connected.

  Does anyone have advice what is the cause of this and how to troubleshoot or resolve?

  Hello

  Given that you are working on Windows 2008 R2 please post your question here:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• EA2700 and remote access to the DVR

  Does anyone have a solution for the router settings allow access remotely
  Recorders digital windows and Linux?

  Justme2012 wrote:
  OK, so now I activated Remoting but the remote routers
  Management port is different from the default port on the DVR.

  The ports must be different. In this way it will not create a conflict. No two devices must use the same port numbers. Once again as what has been mentioned in this thread, you must use the port number provided by the manufacturer for the DVR and just leave the router uses it is default remote management port. This is to ensure that there will be no conflict. To check if the ports were opened successfully you can do an audit of port. You can use this site to check it out. http://ping.EU/port-chk/

• Server ezvpn 887 router for remote access

  Hello.

  I'm having a problem with the implementation of remote access using easyvpn server on a router 887.  I followed the tutorials and also used Assistant cisco configuration professional easyvpn server to the configuration but still having a problem.

  I see, but Phase 1 finished, Phase 2 will fail with the following error...

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: (2003): check IPSec proposal 8

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: turn 1, ESP_AES

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-SHA

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: key length is 128

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: program is 1 (Tunnel)

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: service life of SA (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xC4 0x9B

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: (2003): atts are acceptable.

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 the proposal

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

  (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 88.xx.xxx.174:0, distance = 80.177.185.185:0,.

  local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

  remote_proxy = 192.168.21.12/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

  Protocol = ESP, transform = NONE (Tunnel),

  lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

  SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 128, flags = 0 x 0

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: map_db_find_best found no corresponding card

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: IPSEC (ipsec_process_proposal): proxy unsupported identities

  09:43:26.515 Oct 10: ISAKMP: (2003): IPSec policy invalidated proposal with error 32

  'Proxy unsupported identities' research indicates a NAT problem maybe, but I don't see where this would be.  In my view, the problem is elsewhere.

  I use the VPN Client 5.0.07.0440 and using transparent tunneling IPSec (on TCP/10000) that the client is located behind a firewall/NAT device.

  Does anyone know what may be the issue?  Attached full config.

  Hello Mick

  Before that, one more try. .

  Remote control the pfs as follows

  Profile of crypto ipsec RemoteAccess

  no set pfs group2

  Remove and add the virtual model crypto back

  type of interface virtual-Template1 tunnel

  No ipsec protection RemoteAccess tunnel profile

  Profile of tunnel RemoteAccess ipsec protection

  I hope this will solve your problem

  Henin,

• The managed behind router switch remote access?

  What is the best way to access remotely to a switch behind a router?  I will use a switch SF300, and there is no server.

  For points of access (PA) behind a router, I give each a diffferent LAN address and port number.  In router I have forward TCP traffic with the single port/LAN IP.  Then using the port numbers with the address of the static router, the browser can remote access to the router or the attached AP.  But where do I put the managed switch LAN port number?  Assume default is port 80 and I would change to 8001 to switch #1; 8002 to switch #2; etc.  Could not find this info in the manual of configurtion.

  Hello

  At this point, I would recommend a call to the Cisco Small Business Centre at 1-866-606-1866 support so that action can be taken and your configuration can be reviewed.

  I have reproduced the concern here and I am able to remotely manage my switch SF300 with an RV082 as the router.

  My rule in the RV082 are as follows:

  Creating a custom topic UPnP service.  Create SF300 application name (it is a basic text field and can be any name), 8001 an external port and internal port 80.  I send to the address IP internal SF300 switch and click the check box.  From there on, I select Add to the list.  Once it appears in my list, I then click Save settings at the bottom of the page.

  Thank you!

  Dave

• Why Windows Explorer (Windows 7 PC to the Server 2003 AD domain) keep crashing when accessing files on a network share.

  1. Why Windows Explorer (Windows 7 PC to the Server 2003 AD domain) keep crashing when accessing files on a network share.

  Hi John,.

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the link below.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itprosecurity/threads

  Hope this information helps.

• Filtering of VPN and local access to the remote site

  Hello

  I set up vpn, filtering on all my VPN l2l. I have limited access to remote resources at the local level to the specified ports. It works perfectly.

  But I want to have as full access from local to remote networks (but still retain the remote access to the local level). VPN filter now works as I have two-way with a simple ACL. So is it possible to open all the traffic from the local to remote and all by limiting the remote to the local traffic?

  ASA 5520 8.4 (3)

  Thanks in advance

  Tomasz Mowinski

  Hello

  Well let's say you have a filtering ACL rule when you allow http local network traffic to the remote host

  LAN: 10.10.10.0/24

  remote host: 192.168.10.10/32

  The filter ACL rule is the following:

  FILTER-ACL access-list permit tcp host 192.168.10.10 eq 80 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  I think that this ACL rule would mean also that until the remote host has been using source port TCP/80, it may access any port on any host tcp in your local network as long as it uses the source TCP/80 port.

  I guess you could add a few ranges of ports or even service groups of objects to the ACL rules so that not all well-known ports would be accessible on the LAN. But I guess that could complicate the configurations.

  We are usually management customer and completely different in ASA L2L VPN that allows us to all traffic on another filtering device and do not work in this kind of problems. But of course there are some of the situations/networks where this is not only possible and it is not a feasible option for some because of the costs of having an ASA extra.

  Please indicate if you have found any useful information

  -Jouni

• Why can't connect to a session of console on the Server 2003 x 64 SP2 by using the/admin or/console switch RDP from either a windows XP or windows 7 PC

  Server that I am trying to connect

  Windows Server 2003 Standrad x 64 with SP2 and most if not all of the updates

  PCs in use Windows XP ar (GUI remote desktop and add / admin or/console) and Win7 (same methods but also run the market and the command line command with / v: /f-console)

  I can NEVER get a console session and must go in the server room to install applications

  I should add - the server is in Terminal Server services mode to allow several users to connect and I checked the group policy for restrictions and can't find.

  Server gurus hang out here and would likely be better able to manage this type of problem:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

  We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

  Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

  My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

  Hi John,.

  Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

  CSCuc75090  Details of bug

  The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

  Symptom:

  When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

  Conditions:

  It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

  The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

  Workaround solution:

  N/A

  Some possible workarounds are:

  Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

  Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

  Below some information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

  Hope this helps,

  Luis.

• I just installed an airport extreme router and WiFi works, but the status light still flashes.

  I just installed an airport extreme router and WiFi works, but the status light still flashes.

  Open airport utility... Click EI... and see what the cause of the problem. It will give the list of questions on the summary page. Click on each of them and he will offer you even solutions.

  for example the firmware needs to be updated... nothing major... or DNS is wrong or double NAT...

  Without our crystal ball, we do not know what is the issue.

• SUN grant writing back and allows access to the GL

  Hello
  
  SUN grant writing back and allows access to the GL
  
  Sravan

  If ODI can do it then you can assume generally that SUN will not.
  It seems that everyone forgets to press the useful buttons, correct these days.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Win 7 Pro - make a name of user and password request when accessing to the server computer in the workgroup. Credentials, then considered non valid.

  Recently bought a Dell Dimension 3847 with Windows 7 Pro to replace a workstation that is connected to a network that uses Windows Server 2003. I already set up two other PC's (not same model) with Win 7 Pro, for existing users and had no problems whatsoever. The user of this workstation is an existing one (implemented as an administrator).  I've set up his account and she joined the working group. The other computers in the workgroup are listed under network location. However, when I tried to access the server computer in the Working Group, I got a pop-up window asking for a username and password. This would not have taken place. However, I entered the username and password for that particular user and received a message that the user name and password were not valid. I set up my user account (it has administrative privileges too), on this computer, joined the Working Group, Windows recognizes the other computers in the workgroup, but when I tried to access the server computer I got the same pop-up and had the same problem with my credentials not being recognized. While remaining under my user name, I tried and then access the server computer again but when I arrived at the prompt for the user name and password, I used the 'Administrator' user name with the appropriate password (the credentials used to connect to the server computer) and it worked. I registered to the account of the other user and used the same method to access the server and it worked as well. Any ideas why the user credentials, other than the administrator account, are not recognized?

  Hello

  Sorry for the late reply.

  This problem is better suited in the TechNet forum where we have experts working on the same topic.

  Please post your request in the below link:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  I hope this information helps, get back to us if you need help with Windows.

  Thank you.