Remove values lower than the desired increment

Hello

When you perform a simulation of multi-body with a step size fix that I receive some additional values smaller than the normal increment in output data or values are duplicated. The time channel looks like:

0

0.0002738

0.001

0.002

0.002

0.003

0.004

....

I think that with a simple script I can remove the extra valuues (in this case 0.0002738, 0.002).

E offer this code, but it does not work:

Hello Fischerg,

I would like to know how it works:

Option Explicit
Dim timechannel, CLength CNumber, dBase, limit, K, CurrValue, Epsilon, Delta

timechannel = "[1] / TIME."
CLength = Val (ChnPropGet (timechannel, 'length'))
CNumber = NOC (timechannel)

Epsilon = 0.00001
Limit = 0.001 - Epsilon

dBase = CHDx(1,CNumber)
For K = 2-CLength
CurrValue = CHDx (K, CNumber)
Delta = CurrValue-dBase
"Compare using the value of the Epsilon. Compare float numbers
"with '=' does not always work
If (Delta< limit="" )="" then="">
CHDx (K, CNumber) = NULL
On the other
"Set new base
CurrValue = dBase
End If
Next
Call ChnCharacter (timechannel)
'Delete tagged values. If there are more channels in parallel to the string "TIME."
"those who can be adjusted with the same call. See the online help for ChnNovHandle for more details
Call ChnNovHandle(timechannel,"","Delete","X",1,1,0)

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?

    Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?

    Hello, TopDog16!

    Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7.  From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone.  I would be happy to help you with that!

    Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning).  The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however.  The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen.  Check here to see if sound comes out.

    This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications

    Have a great rest of your week!

  • JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

    JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

    Hi all

    When you try to extend my domain, it fails with the above error.

    any suggestions on a fix?

    is this related to the Fusion Infrastructure ADF RCU utility?

    Thank you

    Hi JCGO,.

    Installed on your DB schema is 12.1.2.0.0, but the Extension of domain requires 12.1.3.0.0.

    One solution is to run the 12.1.3.0.0 UCR, fall of the existing on your DB schema followed by installation 12.1.3.0.0 on the DB schema, so that the extension of area Gets the 12.1.3.0.0 schema

    Something more is to open the template on which you spread the field. The models are present in ${MW_HOME} / oracle_common/common/models/wls, explore requirements inside the yourtemplate.jar and comment out the store schema version prerequisite credentials. This is not a good approach, but again, it's going to be a good solution since the schema 12.1.2.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0 won't much difference.

    Thank you

    Shiva Shankar B N

  • ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for this column?

    Hi guys:

    I'm stuck in this error when I try to do an insert into a table. My Source has 581K records, but only this code and the values described below gives me a headache.

    Here's the DDL for the source and the target.

    CREATE TABLE WRK. VL_FREED
    ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
    NUMBER (15.7) "VL_FREED".
    )

    CREATE TABLE WRK. VL_RENEG
    ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
    NUMBER (15.7) "VL_RENEG".
    )

    CREATE TABLE WRK. WRK_XPTO
    ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
    NUMBER (15,10) "VL_XPTO".
    )

    ------------------------------------------------
    The values for the VL_FREED AND VL_RENEG tables:


    CODE = 458330728 (same on both)
    VL_FREED = 191245.3000000
    VL_RENEG = 74095.3800000

    -------------------------------------------------

    When I try to run this insert:

    INSERT INTO WRK. WRK_XPTO
    (
    CODE,
    VL_XPTO
    )
    Select
    T1. CODE,
    T1. VL_FREED - T2. VL_RENEG
    of WRK. VL_FREED T1, WRK. VL_RENEG T2
    WHERE
    (T1. CD_CODE = T2. CODE);

    I got the error:
    ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for the column

    But how can this be? The result of 191245.3000000 - 74095.3800000 is not greater than a number (15,10).

    Can someone help me on this?

    Number (15,10) means 15 total digits, 10 of which are to the right of the decimal separator, leaving only 5 on the left.

    190 000 - 75 000 = 115 000 (6 digits).

  • Store the value less than the current week and the year.

    Hi all

    I have a table called BACK, which structure is like this
    ITEM_NUMBER   YEAR_WEEK   MS
    ...........   .........   ..
    1N58          2012-WK02   01/15/2012
    1N58          2011-WK02   01/15/2011
    current my procedure I store the value in my new table that is less than the current week. But I want to retain the value less than the current week and the current year. Please, help me to get how I can do this.
    PROCEDURE BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW IS
      BEGIN
     DELETE BACKLOG_LT_CW;
     COMMIT;
          INSERT INTO BACKLOG_LT_CW
            SELECT 
                  DC_UTIL.GEN_YEAR_WEEK(MS) YEAR_WEEK,
                  ITEM_NUMBER,
                  MSD
    
                  FROM BACKLOG
              where to_char(MS, 'IW')<to_char(sysdate, 'IW');
    
      END BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW;
    Currently, with the above code is to store the value in my table of BACKLOG_LT_CW but if you see the data in the table from the BACK you will find YEAR_WEEk 2012-WK02 falls next year, but again it is store in my table because IW took only. Please help me get the soln

    Thanks in advance

    Concerning

    Are you looking for this?

    ...
    where to_char(MS, 'YYYYIW')
    
  • ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for the column '

    When inserting the different entries of cheaper products in this table PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE, I'm having this problem of "java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for the column '.»


    As I see it in the tables (desc pf4. PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE; & PFCA4 of ESCR. DCS_PRICE_LEVEL;), I see the accuracy for the price of the table PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE as NUMBER (12.7) & accuracy for the price of the table DCS_PRICE_LEVEL as NUMBER (19.7). There is therefore a difference in precision 7 units for the price in the PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE table that is causing this problem. So that would be the solution.


    Could you please post my comments, so that I can change the accuracy for the price of the PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE table.
    Need to confirm other columns in the table PF_PRODUCT_VIEWS_PROFILE does not exceed their precision values before making this change.

    Hello

    Ideally avoid data loss as you increase the length of the column as it really is. You have to worry about this in the case if you reduce the length. It is always better to be doubly sure, so also check other tables.

    see you soon

    VT

  • Why the 2d graphics score is much lower than the 3d

    upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

    upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

    The score is less on your computer because your video (graphics) card was obviously designed for its 3D graphics was paramount while 2D was a secondary function.  (You have a game system).

    What specific video card do you have?

  • Why the imported videos have characteristics lower than the source of the videos?

    Hello!

    I do a video for the first time and am totally confused.

    I shot the videos with a digital SLR, videos 1280 x 720.

    I imported the video into Premiere Pro CS5, double click on a video imported so that it has been shown in a window, then I played this video, only to discover its quality was average poorer than the video source - color was inappropriate and there is more noise.

    What's wrong?

    I put the format of pixels in place, I will do 16:9?

    Any help will be rock :))

    Check the resolution of your reading. Its default value is set to 1/2.

    There is a button in the program monitor, it has three colors: red, green, and blue.

  • Move an item of text lower than the rest.

    I'm wet behind the ears here and need a

    step by step instructions on how to move the 2 in H2O slightly

    less than the rest of the text. I have a background layer that must

    to stay blue.

    There may be several ways, but a simple method is the following:

    1. Select the text (T) tool.

    2. your visible CHARACTER Panel by selecting window - character

    3. click on your layer text and using the mouse select just the 2 in the chain of H2O.

    4. in the CHARACTER Panel, put a negative value in the baseline shift box bottom left.

    5. you can change the size by changing the value in the font size at top left as well.

    -Christmas

  • Assets of image import as a res lower than the source

    I have seen several posts similar to this discussion and have never seen a response. Whenever I attempt to ad an image, sometimes half of the original asset. I tried format PNG, JPG, Gif etc. and it's all the same. Years ago, when I used first Muse, it didn't happen. Just to put everything everybody some time, yes I'm saving the images correctly and the size/resolution 100% I'm looking. I did this for a loooong time. For example, I 1600x600px image at 72 dpi. Save the images in the same way and the same resolutions I would entrust to any developer.  My Muse file is located at standard resolution. I deselected retina, hoping that would solve the problem.

    What happens is when I drag the image a Muse W 1600px site, the image comes in about 1/2 - 1 / 3 of the original size. (Note: I also can't not proportional to scale while holding SHIFT as is the norm in Adobe products). I used really love using Muse for prototypes show customers, but for this reason probably, and my inability to get an answer, I gave up. Once and a while, like now, I'm, hoping things will work properly.

    Please let me know if you know what's the deal. kind of makes me crazy. It's used to work fine a few years back.

    If HiDPI is on images will be important to half size. That's how 2 x HiDPI works. A 1600px by 600px image will appear at 800px of 300px Dimensions in Design view and on screens in standard resolution. On a screen HiDPI image will always be physically the same size on screen, but 1600 x 600 pixels will appear.

    How did make you the image in Muse? File > Place and click on the page will bring the image in original size, unless it would be much bigger than the size of your page (in which case Muse will resize itself it down to manageable dimensions). If the image is used as a background fill Image sizing is controlled by the fill parameters (i.e. the scale to adapt, evolve to fill, etc.).

    Regarding the scaling proportional, for better or worse, the default behavior in Muse is the resizing of the images is proportional. If you want the disproportionate scale (free style), then hold down the SHIFT key. Note that this applies to the placed images and the images in the slide show. It does not apply to elements with a background image fill.

  • retrieve a NEW VALUE rather than the OLD VALUE when firepartialaction called even

    Hi gurus of the OFA.

    I have an advanced table where to enter a value. This table is populated using vo.

    (1) now I have a firepartialaction with a parameter with one of the columns of the table.
    (2) I noticed that when I change a value and the hover out of this column, the parameter returns the OLD value of the table.
    (3) the question is, how do I get the new value? If the creation of a parameter for the firepartialaction event will NOT recover the NEW value, what is the best why to get it back!

    Thank you!

    In the settings of the firePartialAction, you must by the way some settings for the resulting values in the CO.
    In general, the format is ${oa. ViewInstance.AttributeName}

    For your case try using ${oa.*current *.} AttributeName}
    This will give you the new value.

  • HP Elitebook RAM running frequency values lower than possible hardware (factory setting)

    As part of the upgrade of RAM (from 4 GB to 8 GB) on my HP Elitebook 8560W, I did several tests to find out what type of RAM to my PC a. I was surprised that my RAM (Samsung, PC3-10600 DDR3 SDRAM SO-DIMM) runs only on 666 MHz = 6.67 * 99.8 MHz (9-9-9-24 calendar, 1.50 V voltage).

    However, the factory often supposed to be 1 333 MHz. RAM How can I set correct values of RAM clock 1 333 MHz?

    More info: updating my BIOS: 68SVD worm. F.42; 07/15/2013 Motherboard: HP 1631 & Chipset: Intel QM67 (Cougar Point) (B3)

    If you need additional information, feel free to ask me questions.

    Thank you in advance for your help!

    Since your stick of ram is a Double Data Rate (DDR3) as any other RAM sticks of today, its actual frequency still shows 2 times less.  What you see is correct.   In the past, SDRam yielded 1 data at each clock, with DDR ram, 2 the data are transferred to each clock (hz), so the performance is doubled = equivalent to twice the frequency.  Two-channel will accelerate the transfer of ram using two sticks at the same time, but you can still see 666 mhz cpu - z.

    Been built several computers game, when I set the frequency in bios to the right pair, it always show 2 x less, don't worry!   PS.  I have 1600 mhz DDR3 sticks and show 801,3 mhz of CPU - z.

    In ADDITION, if you upgrade your ram, so that they can operate in dual channel, be sure to buy a stick of the same size (4 GB), frequency (1333 mhz), calendar (9-9 - 9-24) and voltage (1.50 V).  Those who should be easy to find.  It is always better to buy Kit with two since they are tested to work exactly the same, there may be difference of manufacturing between brands and models, but it shouldn't matter much if these 4 parameters are the same.  If you buy a lower frequency stick, the other fits than slower.  If possible, buy one of the same brand to be absolubly that they match (Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9)

    The BIOS * could * be reflashed at a CV not a compatible with your motherboard, but there are a lot of risks for this purpose, up to an unusable computer (motherboard will need to be removed and would need a new BIOS chip, a reprogrammed chip probably welded or a new motherboard).  That's what tells the computer parts, how to work with each other.  Also, your computer will be out of warranty.  You don't need it to be since your ram is working as expected.

    A lot of information here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Everything-You-Need-To-Know-About-DDR-DDR2-and-DDR3-Memories/167

    And here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Everything-You-Need-to-Know-About-the-Dual-Triple-and-Quad-Channel-Memory-Architectures/133

  • Percentage of battery PC stopping at values lower than 100%

    I have a Samsung laptop for almost 5 years, running Windows 7, and last year, I had some problems with my battery that couldn't charge more. I decided to replace the battery and so I bought a new 3/4 months ago. However, this battery is already getting a few problems I've ever seen. It is possible to recharge, which is good, but the battery percentage never reaches the value of 100%. In addition, the values that it prevents become lower and lower: last week it stopped at 80%, but this week can't go more than 50%. I presume that in several 1/2 weeks I won't be able to use it.

    I think it is my laptop that is, somehow, to "destroy" the batteries, but I already searched on the internet and not a clue. How can I solve this problem?

    Thank you

    Nuno

    Hello!

    the power on the power cable converter box may sometimes have problems. Unplug the device from the laptop, inspect the cable, see how hot the box is. Check the PIN that goes into the laptop. All the lights indicating the load or the power cable. the small icon in the taskbar wiggle cable see if the icon changes.

  • 5 GHz network connection is much lower than the 2.4 GHz of E3000 connection?

    I have an E3000 who has double bands, 2.4 GHz and 5 Ghz.  On the computer at home, I have a USB adapter Wireless-N dual band who sees the two networks.  I primariliy use the net of 5 GHz for the XBox 360 and the net for 2.4 GHz computers, but I noticed that the computers all to see the net with a much lower 5 GHz signal strength.  Reading the marketing hype, I expected the opposite.  Obviously in this case, it's the same router, the same computer in the same physical location and the same card.  Why he would see the net 2.4 GHz with very good to excellent signal strength and 5 GHz net as very low or weak signal strength?

    This article can help you find what is the cause of bad signal.

    Don't forget, with the increase in the frequency, scope decreases generally. Accordingly, 5 GHz systems are generally less than those operating in the 2.4 GHz band.

  • ODI 12 C | Error ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for the column

    I keep getting this error when trying to load an XML file exchange rates in a table of data warehouse. I defined the type of XML data model to NUMBER (18,15), identical to the target and it works for rates with an accuracy of 1, then when the transformed with an accuracy of 4 it generates this error. This was really frustrating... There must be somewhere a temporary table created with precision different, right? Any help with this would be appreciated.

    The example data:

    Result of currency rates

    1.4454325324 COL AUD

    1.3943435826 CAD PASS

    8.9824929424 COL CNY

    4326.4323456123 COP FAIL

    You seem to be confused with the terminology you use here. The precision is the total number of digits allowed in your number in your definition, i.e. NUMBER (18,15), precision 18, which means that you can have up to 18 digits in your number. However, you have also defined a scale value of 15 that denotes the amount of numbers that are sitting to the right of the decimal point. This means that you have only allowed for the 3 digits to sit to the left of the decimal point that is precision - scale (18-15). That's why you get the error when you try and load the COP currency that your definition of data type does not support having more than 3 digits left of the decimal separator.

Maybe you are looking for