route all traffic through wrt openVpn 1900ac Server

Similar Questions

• Tunnel of RV042 V3 that routes all traffic to the VPN

  Hi all

  I use Cisco Linksys RV-042 with V2 hardware to set up a VPN tunnel that route all traffic to the remote gateway (a Cisco ASA 5510). This configuration works very well, and I can access the local router and other resources to the central site.

  I'm doing the same thing with Cisco RV042 with version V3 of the material, but I can't access the local router until the VPN breaks down. I can ' ping, SNMP the local router, or access but I can access the central site. Very strange.

  Do you know what can I do to access the router local (for example, hardware V2) with connected VPN?

  Thank you

  Rafael

  Just a hunch, but in the remote network you agree with what the network and subnet?

  I've seen this symptom before.

  LAN on the RV series.

  10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Trust remote networks

  10.10.1.0 255.255.248.0

  It is traffic destined to the router on the 10.10.2.1 ip address is through the tunnel forward. So, for this purpose, you can only access the router LAN interface when the tunnel is out of service. I'm not sure why ping works but it does. I'm looking into this symptom on a different device, but the device has a similar graphical interface.

  I would like to know if you have a similar setup.

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  Randy Manthey

  CCNA, CCNA - security

• How to send all traffic through the VPN, RV082 material v3

  Hello

  I found this guide to send all traffic to RV042 branch to the RV082 of central office:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadBody/10261-102-1-22927/Small_Business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc

  But this guide is for the material of v2. I tried and did not work, so I wonder if there are new modules for hardware v3 (firmware v4.2)

  I have a RV042 brach office connected through the VPN Tunnel work to a central office RV082. I want to route all traffic

  Office of brach in the RV082 from the central office.

  Thank you very much

  Oliver

  Hi Oliver, this is called esp wildcard forwarding (full tunnel).

  Here are a few useful topics

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3766661

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3816181

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Send all traffic through the vpn tunnel

  Does anyone know how to send all traffic through the tunnel vpn on both sides?  I have a server EZVpn on one side and one EZVpn client on the other.  I'm not natting on each side.  I use the value default 'tunnelall' for the attributes of group policy.  On the client side all traffic, even if not intended for the subnet of the side server, seems to pass through the tunnel.  But if I ping the side server, the same rules don't seem to apply.  Traffic destined for rates aside customer through the tunnel, but the traffic that is not pumped on the external interface in the clear.  That's not cool.

  Hello

  Clinet traffic to server through tunnel, that's right, right?

  Traffic from server to client through tunnel, but the rest of the traffic is not, no?

  This works as expected because in ezvpn, politics of "tunnel all ' is for traffic is coming from the client., do not leave the server.

  Side server, customer traffic will pass through tunnel, the rest used.

  Sian

• QUESTION by RV180W: All traffic through the router is considered to be the router IP

  Beta Firmware: 1.0.2.3

  Of Web server log showing the problem:

  2013-03-08 05:39:21 192.168.1.102 POST /somewebpage/somefile.htm - 80 - 192.168.1.1 - 404 0 0 6098 410 457

  QUESTION: 100% of the traffic transmitted via the router takes the IP address of the router when it arrives at the web server level. In this case, 192.168.1.1

  My mail server and FTP servers have adjustments because of the anti-hammering problem this creates.

  Has anyone seen this problem and know of a fix for this?

  @Cisco... Before you suggest that I have to call tech support, I already have. I just had the race and they told me to call level 2 support and do not provide me with a phone number. For some reason, he refused to escalate the call. He simply told me to contact a person of a previous issue, in which they gave me the beta firmware to download and I spent a lot of time on the phone to get there. I don't want to talk to the same person who spoke to my last question.

  Yes, I have seen this problem and reported it. Should have the Bug ID CSCue49377, but I can't verify this, because I don't have access to the bugs database.

  See https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2196509

• WRVS4400N will not route all traffic on IPsec

  All my remote sites use various routers to route all their traffic via IPsec.  However, I have a WRVS4400N w/firmware configured 2.0.2.1 with a tunnel of work.  My problem is that I need to define the Group of remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 so all traffic is forced through the IPsec tunnel and not on the local gateway.  When I make the mistake, Remote Security Group and Local security group cannot be in the same network. However, it works with Cisco/Linksys RV042.

  Any ideas?  Attached are the screenshots of each.

  Transmission of wildcard ESP isn't a feature support, therefore not documented in the product documentation. If you need a wifi router that supports this feature, you can see the series Cisco ISR, which is base IOS.

• AnyConnect: How to route ALL traffic over VPN

  In the past, when I use a built-in Windows VPN (PPTP), I could choose everything would go through the VPN, or if only the things that did not resolve been there. I copy/paste the VPN connection and rename them so we called something_all and the other something_std. I choose which one I needed and start this one.

  Now I use Secure Mobility Cisco AnyConnect Client (on my Windows 7 machine), I don't seem to have this option. I seem to be locked in a mode where only the URLS that fail to solve find themselves through the VPN. It works for the private areas, my employer. This means having access to machines which are not turned to the audience.

  My problem is that, sometimes, I want everything to go through it. For example, if I'm in Europe and that someone (in America) tells me that I need to visit a site and solve a problem, what I find is that despite type in American URL, I get redirected to the European site, because it is a public site. I want to switch the VPN in the mode 'road everything', or even better, to have a list that I manage areas I want to go through it (even if the all or nothing is all that I really need).

  Is this possible? I saw the option called something like 'allow access to the local network', but this doesn't seem to be something useful.

  The ultimate test is that if I go to one of these sites, what - is - my - ip - address, it does not say I'm in Europe, but on the contrary says: I'm in America (or as much as the goal of the VPN is, I have several choices of my employer).

  If instead of "tunnelspecified", we use the keyword "tunnelall" the value with 'split-tunnel-policy', which will push the route 0.0.0.0/0 for the session of your client.

  It is indeed the wildcard character that you are asking about.

• WRT 1900 ACS - Impossible to carry web traffic through openvpn

  2.3.11 OpenVPN windows 7 X 86. Router information

  Firmware version:	1.0.0.169041
  Serial number:	18E1060B503339

  By default, OpenVPN only sends traffic over the VPN, which is intended for the VPN. Normal traffic to Web sites, for example, is not sent by the VPN. Which can be modified to send all traffic through the VPN?

  @alexdemon

  Router WRT1900ACS is a SOHO router. It doesn't have a feature of access rule where the web traffic can be managed and regulated. The tool of Parental control of your Linksys Smart Wi - Fi account is designed for local customers only.

  Note:

  OpenVPN can create the tunnel from the remote host to the main network and thus web traffic cannot be routed through the router firewall.

  Ann_18678
  Linksys technical support

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Try to route all ipsec traffic

  Hello

  Can anyone help me please with config below. I am trying to route all traffic (web browsing) by the router.

  For now I can connect to the vpn and browse the network, but users cannot resolve web pages (page loading without end). If I activate split tunnel web browsing works but not what I'm used to.

  LAN pool 192.168.10.0/24

  local pool 192.168.20.0/24

  I assume it has something with ACL and NAT, but I can't understand that.

  Config is attached.

  Thank you.

  I think your config should work.

  The router which model is it and what version of software you are running?

• Configuration of VPN server easy to tunnel ALL traffic?

  Hi guys,.

  Someone at - it a link or a tutorial to point me in the right direction?  Here is the example that I follow:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/ps6659/prod_white_paper0900aecd80313bdf.PDF

  I would like to than the easy VPN client to tunnel all traffic through the vpn.  This includes internal and external.  Thus, for example, web browsing also would be through the tunnel from the client computer.

  Thanks for the help!

  Jason

  Hi Jason,

  Since no split-tunnels are configured here, yes all traffic will be sent through the tunnel.

  Please evaluate the useful messages

  Best regards

  Eugene

• All traffic Vlan to the Interface of the Proxy Server

  Hello!

  I need little help to route all the traffic on VLAN to the proxy server.

  I have different VLANS on switches L2 200-26 and by 300-28-L3 for routing.

  I have already created VLANs and able to rout them, but facing problem for routing traffic to the interface proxy for internet access.

  I have different VLAN for example Vlan 10, 10.10.10.0/24 sales, Vlan20 10.10.20.0/24 Marketing. I have trunk between switches interfaces and default 1U is the same on all switches.

  My proxy server has two NICs, one is connected to a dsl modem and other one to the switch port that uses the IP 192.168.0.2 to default vlan1.

  I am able to surf the internet using vlan1 but not on ther VLAN.

  I put the route defaults to the switch of 192.168.0.2, but don't not routing for internet to another VLAN.

  Thank you

  Hello

  To answer your questions:

  1. I have to update the following files?

  https://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283019617&release...

  Yes, please let me know what firmware and boot code, that you have right now and I'll tell you what is the best way for you to upgrade because you shouldn't go straight to the latest firmware unless you run already 1.3.5.58 or later version.

  2. it supports to 8 dhcp pools. I have swimming pools, but I have more than 8 VLAN. I put all the settings, works very well.

  You are right and I forgot to mention the limitation of only 8 DHCP pools, I'm sorry. That being said, make sure that your current DHCP server uses IP addresses assigned to each VLAN on the switch as the gateway by default for the VLAN respective.

  3 for the Proxy Server, I need to find a way to point back roads of VLAN to vlan mapping static address on the switch. I'm confused in this little piece.

  I understand that this can be confusing, let me see if I can explain it a little better.

  Assuming that everything on the switch is configured according to my recommendations can

  1. you need a single, a route by default on the switch, so that when a PC is connected to one of VLAN on she tries to go online, an unknown IP address to the switch, it will send it to the Ip address of the router, because the proxy server will be able to reach this IP public, unknown to any Web site.

  2 - when the traffic is back to this Web site, it will be intended for another subnet that the proxy server is on. Suppose the answer is looking for 10.10.10.100 (subnet unknown to the proxy server), without a static route on the proxy server it say where to send this traffic, packets are simply deleted.

  3. you need to create as many static routes on the proxy server as the amount of VIRTUAL LANs, you have on your network.

  For now I know that the proxy server is 192.168.0.2 on VLAN 1 but I don't know what the IP address of the switch is on the same VLAN, it should be something on the 192.168.0.x range.

  All journeys should look like this:

  10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 send 192.168.0.x (IP address of the switch on the VLAN 1)

  10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0 send 192.168.0.x (IP address of the switch on the VLAN 1)

  Alternatively, if all your internal VIRTUAL local networks are on the beach of 10.10.x.x then you should be able to create a single rule to summarize all the VLAN as this:

  10.10.1.1 255.255.0.0 send 192.168.0.x (IP address of the switch on the VLAN 1)

  Please let me know if it was a little clearer.

  Feel free to ask any questions.

• Configuration of the router to allow VPN traffic through

  I would like to ask for assistance with a specific configuration to allow VPN traffic through a router from 1721.

  The network configuration is the following:

  Internet - Cisco 1721 - Cisco PIX 506th - LAN

  Remote clients connect from the internet by using the Cisco VPN client. The 1721 should just pass the packets through to the PIX, which is 192.168.0.2. Inside of the interface of the router is 192.168.0.1.

  The pix was originally configured with a public ip address and has been tested to work well to authenticate VPN connections and passing traffic in the local network. Then, the external ip address was changed to 192.168.0.2 and the router behind.

  The 1721 is configured with an ADSL connection, with fall-over automatic for an asynchronous connection. This configuration does not work well, and in the local network, users have normal internet access. I added lists of access for udp, esp and the traffic of the ahp.

  Cisco VPN clients receive an error indicating that the remote control is not responding.

  I have attached the router for reference, and any help would be greatly apreciated.

  Manual.

  Brian

  For VPN clients reach the PIX to complete their VPN the PIX needs to an address that is accessible from the outside where the customers are. When the PIX was a public address was obviously easy for guests to reach the PIX. When you give the PIX one address private, then he must make a translation. And this becomes a problem if the translation is dynamic.

  You have provided a static translation that is what is needed. But you have restricted the TCP 3389. I don't know why you restricted it in this way. What is supposed to happen for ISAKMP and ESP, AHP traffic? How is it to be translated?

  If there is not a static translation for ISAKMP traffic, ESP and AHP so clients don't know how to reach the server. Which brings me to the question of what the address is configured in the client to the server?

  HTH

  Rick

• Impossible to route traffic through a tunnel "will" in a frame relay Center and spoke environment.

  Hello

  I have a network star frames environment.

  Headquarters (hub) and around seven remote branch offices.

  I'm trying to encrypt all data between the hub-and-spoke is borrowing point gre tunnels to point of the hub-spoke.

  I made the necessary set up on all routers and using SDM and all tunnels appeared.

  The problem when I tried to redirect all traffic to the respective subnet through the tunnel s assigned

  nothing is happen.

  I decided to do a bit of troubleshooting with a radius of one and test the connection to the hub.

  Ping from Headquarters to the tunnel endpoint

  Router01 #ping ppp.168.140.14

  Type to abort escape sequence.

  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to ppp.168.140.14, wait time is 2 seconds:

  .....

  Success rate is 0% (0/5)

  Ping of speaks to the tunnel endpoint

  router04 #ping ppp.168.140.4

  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to ppp.168.140.4, wait time is 2 seconds:

  .....

  See nearby networking is learned by talking about following the eigrp process

  router04 #sh ip eigrp not

  Neighbors of the EIGRP intellectual property to process 10

  H address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq

  (s) (ms) NTC Num

  14 40 2280 0 2493678 2d21h Se0/0/0.1 0 10.x.x.1

  See nearby networking learned by Hub following the eigrp process

  H address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq

  (s) (ms) NTC Num

  8 ppp.168.160.16 Tu2 31 00:00:26 1 5000 1 0

  7 ppp.168.150.15 Tu1 13 00:00:47 1 5000 1 0

  3 ppp.168.170.17 Tu3 14 00:00:59 1 5000 1 0

  2 ppp.192.168.190.19 Tu4 13 00:01:05 1 5000 1 0

  0 ppp.168.140.14 Tu0 31 00:01:18 1 5000 1 0

  11 10.x.0.6 Se0/0/0.4 12 02:40:20 53 318 0 399684

  1 10.x.x.9 Se0/0/0.7 11 02:41:20 1380 5000 0 377427

  9 10.x.x.5 Se0/0/0.3 11 02:44:28 47 1426 0 370651

  4 10.x.x.7 Se0/0/0.5 12 51 306 0 363006 1d23h

  5 10.x.x.8 Se0/0/0.1 12 77 462 0 1210492 2d06h

  12 11 51 306 0 395295 2d21h Se0/0/0.8 10.x.x.11

  6 10.x.x.4 Se0/0/0.2 14 53 318 0 284379 2d21h

  Router01 #.

  I have a closed configurations of the hub and one of the RADIUS (the problem as outline above that happens for all the rays).

  There is also the pre-shared keys were Strip and IP set up for security reasons.

  Concerning

  Jomo

  Sure no problem.

  Have a good holiday.

• ASA - Tunnel all traffic, allow rays to communicate with each other

  Well, I hope someone can help me with this headache! Switching to employ a PIX and VPN 3005 concentrator Office at home in an ASA5510 for firewall and IPSEC tunnels. It is pretty much a

  • VPN on a stick, multiple rays.
  • All traffic sent by tunnel
  • Internet access through main office (using the web filter) of
  • VOIP to VOIP between rays
  • All departments are using the clients VPN 3005 HW or ASA 5505 s

  HEADQUARTERS: 10.0.0.0/24

  Speaks 1: 192.168.11.0 / 24

  Speaks 2: 192.168.12.0 / 24

  Speaks 3: 192.168.13.0 / 24

  -continues to 192.168.31.0 / 24

  Spoke with the current configuration, 1 can communicate with all the resources in the home, office and Internet integrated properly checked by a tracert. However, the rays cannot communicate with each other. This is required for VOIP traffic, when all TALK TALK calls are made (sites).

  Logging information when talk of talks initiated icmp:

  • No group of translation found for icmp src, dst outside: 192.168.31.1 inside: 192.168.11.1 (type 8, code 0)

  If I remove the nat (outside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.00 - rays will begin to respond to each other, but then the rays cannot tunnel through the Home Office Internet traffic. My brain is so scrambled after the cramming of VPN configurations for these days, so I hope someone has an idea. I've always used concentrators 3005, so it's a little different! In the search for documentation for this configuration, I was surprised that this isn't a most common topology. It seems that this article would (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml), but there is no rays! In any case, I'm sure this has something to do with NAT rules and perhaps who need access for traffic list speaks of talking.

  =============================================

  ASA Version 8.2 (1)
  !
  hostname asa5510

  interface Ethernet0/0
  Speed 100
  full duplex
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP address 97.65.x.x 255.255.255.224

  interface Ethernet0/1
  Speed 100
  full duplex
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP 10.0.0.40 255.255.0.0

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  the DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 object-group network
  object-network 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0

  object-network 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list sheep extended ip 10.0.0.0 allow 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

  Allow Access-list extended wccp servers ip host 10.0.0.83 a

  Redirect traffic extended access-list deny ip any object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1

  Redirect traffic scope permitted any one ip access-list

  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep
  NAT (inside) 1 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 97.65.x.x 1
  Route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 1
  Route inside 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 1
  Route inside 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 1

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  Crypto ipsec df - bit clear-df outdoors

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 1 transform-set RIGHT

  map mymap 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  mymap outside crypto map interface

  crypto isakmp identity address

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  crypto ISAKMP ipsec-over-tcp port 10000

  management-access inside

  a basic threat threat detection

  no statistical access list - a threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception

  WCCP web cache redirect-list Redirect-traffic group-list password xxxxxxx wccp-servers
  WCCP 90 redirect-list traffic Redirect wccp servers group-list password xxxxxxx

  WebVPN

  internal MJHIvpn group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy MJHIvpn
  value of server WINS 10.0.10.1 10.0.10.2
  value of 10.0.10.1 DNS server 10.0.10.2
  allow password-storage
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall
  mjhi.local value by default-field
  allow to NEM

  username field-3002 SjfS1Pq2xZGxHicx encrypted password

  attributes of username field-3002
  VPN-access-hour no
  VPN - 250 simultaneous connections
  VPN-idle-timeout no
  VPN-session-timeout no
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  allow password-storage
  type of remote access service

  remote access to field tunnel-group type

  General-field tunnel-group attributes
  Group Policy - by default-MJHIvpn

  IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group field
  pre-shared-key *.

  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect the skinny
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the sip
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the tftp
  inspect the they
  inspect the icmp
  !
  global service-policy global_policy

  Hello Ala,

  In Act got to be with the Nat configuration.

  So basically you want to tunnel the traffic on the rays to communicate with each other.

  OK, it would be with a nat 0 with the access list with the corresponding traffic outside.

  Also on the crypto ACL for each site configuration, you must add an entry for the traffic of other offices.

  I hope that I have explained myself.

  Have a good

  Julio

  Note all useful posts!