Configuration of the router to allow VPN traffic through

Similar Questions

• SSL VPN may be configured on the router from Cisco 881/K9?

  I'm now confused if SSL VPN can be configured on the router from Cisco 881/K9.

  Please someone advise me.

  If Yes, for only 5 users, what I need to buy the license or license is supplied with the router?

  Thank you.

  Yes, and you need a license:

  FL-WEBVPN-10-K9

  License SSL VPN functionality for up to 10 users (incremental), to 12.4 T based only IOS versions

  FL-SSLVPN10-K9

  License SSL VPN functionality for up to 10 users (incremental) for the only based 15.x IOS versions

• How do I know if my router has been compromised if a hacker does not any change in the configuration of the router?

  How do I know if my router has been compromised if a hacker does not any change in the configuration of the router?

  Do you know how to access the Linksys configuration screen?  Click Administration.  You should be able to access the logs from here.

  What happens if they have an older linksys router?

  

  Click on the Windows "Start" button and select "All programs." Click on "Internet Explorer" to open a web browser.

  Type "192.168.1.1" in the address text box and press "enter." This IP address is the default value for a Linksys router. If you have reprogrammed the router to have a different IP address, enter your IP address instead.

  Click the log tab

  model # here

  http://homesupport.Cisco.com/en-us/support?ICID=global-header-support-link

  192.168.1.1 is an IP address that is normally used by the routers broadbandfrom Linksys.

  If the router has an IP 192.168.1.1, you can connect by opening a Web browser and visiting

  http://192.168.1.1/

  This allows to connect you to the console of the router administrator and access its configuration screens.

  http://compnetworking.about.com/od/routers/g/192_168_1_1_def.htm

• "Printer settings not comply with the configuration of the router.

  Hello

  I'm trying to establish a wireless connection with my printer to my computer, but the answer above, "printer settings not comply with the configuration of the router" someone has the solution please. Peter

  Hello

   
  • What is the brand and model of the printer?
   
  You can check this link:
   
  Network printer problems
  
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-network-printer-problems
   
  I also suggest you to check the manufacturer support for assistance to correct the settings of the printer.

• IP NAT on the router on SSL - VPN appliance

  Someone at - it allows to transmit 443/SSL on a SSL VPN Cisco 891 - K9 unit?

  (I have never encountered this situation before as the router VPN terminated public face directly or we had several IPs public to assign the VPN device directly a public IP address).

  With ' ip nat inside source static tcp 44.55.66.255 443 10.10.10.150 443 extensible "is supposed to pass the SSL request to the appliance SSL VPN to 10.10.10.150 to have VPN applications ended here.

  But failed miserably body 891 - K9 created a virtual ARP entry for 10.10.10.150. So two MACs with the same IP address.

  So 443 requests were sent to its interface. At the hearing of NAT, I can't ssh inside SSL - VPN, but by the time the statemet disappeared, I can ssh and warning dupliacte ARP goes.

  * 1 Nov 19:22:46.871: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  * 1 Nov 19:23:18.083: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  * 1 Nov 19:23:48.295: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  RTR #sh clock
  * 19:24:26.487 UTC Sunday, November 1, 2015
  RTR #sh ip arp 10.10.10.150
  Protocol of age (min) address Addr Type Interface equipment
  Internet 10.10.10.150 - e02f.6d96.8dd0 ARPA Vlan10
  RTR #sh ip arp 10.10.10.150
  Protocol of age (min) address Addr Type Interface equipment
  Internet 10.10.10.150 - e02f.6d96.8dd0 ARPA Vlan10
  RTR #sh sh ip route 10.10.10.150

  Cisco TAC to reproduce this problem at the moment to report dev.

  Does anyone else have this problem or a workaround?

  Thank you.

  I may be misunderstanding but isn't your NAT statement backwards IE. If you want traffic to pass to 10.10.10.150 it shouldn't be-

  ' ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.150 43 43 44.55.66.25x.

  isn't the device for SSL connection on interface 'ip nat inside '?

  Jon

• WRT160N v3: unable to connect to the page web configuration of the router with Firefox or IE

  Whenever I try to connect to my router's admin page, I get "the connection to the server was reset while the page is loading."  This happens with FIrefox 11 and started when I upgraded to 8 or 9.  A machine running FF 3.6 does not have this problem; I get right in.  Words IE 9 is "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" (after complaining about the certificate has expired).

  I ran Wireshark to see if I could learn something, but everything that I could understand was:

  https handshake was OK.

  First TLS packet is received by the router, which then immediately issues a reset and the connection is interrupted.  I don't know why.

  Has anyone seen this? or I have a setup that is screwed to the top (or router)?

  Then I did a full-on reset. I had tried to get in the Mode of administration, following an article in the FAQ, but the web page came in normal mode, default 192.168.1.1. From there on, I WAS able to make the success of downloading the new firmware from 2010 (v3.0.03). Unfortunately, once I've reconfigured the box to a similar to the previous configuration, I have the same problem: connection to https://10.244.122.1 of Firefox 3.6 works; 12 Firefox (now), it will fail, get the error "reset while page is loading". My last try will just disable the https - I just discovered where I can - and see if it will work. Because it's only on my home network, if traffic to the configuration page is not encrypted it really doesn't matter that much. (I had previously determined using Wireshark happened to reset during the TLS negotiation after the HTTPS had finished). And hell, that worked. So my problem is not resolved, but it is bypassed and I'll mark it closed.,.

• I am trying to disable the option 'comments' on my wireless internet connection. I was told to go to my configuration of the router, but how do the router on my PC?

  In the past, I have activated the 'comments' option while others may have access to my wireless internet, but now I want to turn it off.  I got to go to my router configuration. How do the settings on my router on my PC?  I forgot how I activated the option.  Thank you very much.

  Hello

  You must contact the manufacturer of the router for the best assistance.

• Problem with multiple downloads with the router. Allows you to change the TCP MSS value?

  Original title: TCP MSS

  Hi all.

  I currently have a problem with multiple downloads with my current router.  If I have two current downloads at the same time I have no access to all web sites.  It's almost as if the downloads take my meaning of bandwidth there is more nothing for ordinary surfing.

  As a test I put an older router on my system and have a significant improvement in performance.  I have 2 downloads in progress and also surf at the same time.

  To compare two routers, I noticed that the only real difference between the two is that the TCP MSS value is set to '0' on the router of the problem, and then assign him 1392 (MTU - 40) on the router to elderly who gives better performance.

  It is my understanding that this value governs the size of transmitted packets.

  My question is this:

  What is the MSS value which is causing the problem?

  Congratulations in advance.

  Be sure to interpret the values. The '0' means no not literally because the link would not work. It is likely, that it allows the local device set limits for the link. Don't forget that there is a Maximum value and as such can be any value up to such limit as defined by all devices in the path.

  You can try capping manually but it is unlikely that any local limit will come to effect unless you set very low.

• Problem with the configuration of the router

  Hello

  I use the WRT160Nv2 and want to redirect a port, but when I go to advanced settings in the EasyLink Advisor and log on to the router of the page it is not loading properly page.

  Here is a picture of what it looks like:

  http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9386/BasicSetup.PNG

  What should I do to fix this? And there at - it another way to redirect ports?

  Emil

  Do not use the Easy Link Advisor.  Simply use a wired computer and go to 192.168.1.1, then.  If the same, press and hold the button of reset for 30 seconds then release.  Wait 10 seconds and cycle power to the router.  Reconnect with username password 'admin' empty and check.

• Is it still possible? Customer VPN traffic through a PIX for an another VPN?

  Hi, I just want to know if the following is actually technically possible? I'm starting to think I'm trying to implement a solution that is simply not possible.

  I have the following:

  VPN<->CiscoPix506e<->Cisco3000 Clients

  VPN clients running an IPSEC VPN for the 506th Cisco PIX and can access its "internal network" very well.

  The Cisco pix is running a VPN to another company where all network traffic is nat'ed to a single address IP RFC1918 before coming out of the tunnel (requirement of the other company to avoid the problems of overlap)

  and everyone on the "internal network" can access this great VPN.

  I want that people who use the VPN client to be able to access the other site-to-site VPN. I think that NAT forced to the external company VPN is a problem.

  All of the examples for VPN VPN cross-I see specify NAT should be disabled on the entire path. I can't do it in this situation. Is it possible to make this work?

  I guess with a good statement of ACL that all my problems will be solved.

  If you just get the users connect to the cisco 3000 rather than transversing my network. I don't have for the following reasons. I have no access to the cisco 3000 vpn concentrator and a very limited amount of the tunnels that they can open for my business. I was instructed to implement a solution to facilitate the life of employees (so that they only run a VPN tunnel at a time to do their work). For the moment, they need access to the systems within our corporate network and external society through the site to site VPN (it's actually a web application). They can do this at the office but obviously not home if they attempt to use remote access.

  I have attached a diagram of the network example PDF explaining the situation.

  Networks of each address is the following (change of the actual address of the innocents :))):

  CLIENTS_VPN

  192.168.10.0/24

  Internal network

  192.168.1.0/24

  External VPN end point

  192.168.20.0/24

  Address used for NAT on the VPN

  172.16.1.1/32

  the IOS config

  local IP pool - 192.168.10.1 VPN CLIENTS - 192.168.10.254

  inside ip access list allow a whole

  access-list allowed SHEEP ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  access list permits EXTERNAL-ACL-VPN ip 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  EXTERNAL-ACL-NAT of the list of permitted access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  IP address outside a.b.c.d 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  Global interface 2 (external)

  Global (outside) 1 172.16.1.1

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list SHEEP

  NAT (inside) - EXTERNAL-ACL-1 NAT access list 0 0

  NAT (inside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  outside access-group in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a.b.c.d 1

  Thank you

  Jason.

  I understand from your description of the scenario, you try to route traffic on the same interface on which it was received on the PIX. This is called pinning hair in traffic and is not currently supported in PIX (6.3).

• VPN traffic through incoming port

  On my ASA 5510 I want for the VPN clients can connect on the outer harbour and have their internet traffic directed back on that same port, with the internal traffic inside port.  Is this possible?  If so, how does do this?

  Will be transmitted traffic VPN based on the routing table after out of the tunnel.

  If you do not want to let Internet traffic to turn on the external interface, you must add

  -permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  -make the Association NAT change such as

  Global interface 4 (external)

  NAT (outside) 4

• VPN; list of access on the external interface allowing encrypted traffic

  Hi, I have a question about the access list on the external interface of a router 836. We have several routers on our clients site, some are lan2lan, some are client2router vpn.

  My question is; Why should I explicitly put the ip addresses of the client vpn or tunnel lan to the access list. Because the encrypted traffic to already allowing ESPs & isakmp.

  The access list is set to the outgoing interface with: ip access-group 102 to

  Note access-list 102 incoming Internet via ATM0.1

  Note access-list 102 permit IP VPN range

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.123.32.0 0.0.0.255 192.123.33.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 102 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 102 permit esp a whole

  Note access-list 102 Open VPN Ports and other

  access-list 102 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq isakmp newspaper

  I have to explicitly allow 192.123.32.0 (range of lan on the other side) & 14.1.1.0 (range of vpn client) because if I'm not I won't be able to reach the network.

  The vpn connection is not the problem, all traffic going through it.

  As far as I know, allowing ESPs & isakmp should be sufficient.

  Can anyone clarify this for me please?

  TNX

  Sebastian

  This has been previously answered on this forum. See http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.ee9f970/0#selected_message for more details.

• Configure the firewall to allow VPN connections to a remote site

  Hi all

  I do a lot of how to configure VPN servers, so please bear with me if I explain a bit wrong!

  If all goes well a quick question, I am trying to connect a VPN client that is located behind a firewall at a remote PIX server using RADIUS authentication. I am able to ping remote IP of VPN server, but cannot connect - errors are "peer remote unresponsive" for UDP and "has not established TCP connection" for TCP.

  Topology of the short...

  Local PC, fixed IP 192.x.x.1, using VPN Client 4.0.3

  Connect through firewall type unknown to the Internet

  This firewall has outgoing ping enabled, and temporarily all UDP and TCP ports open for pc local ip above fixed.

  VPN client configured with access to the group, and I tried to use UDP and TCP, with and without transparent tunnel.

  Does anyone have any suggestions as to why the connection cannot be made even if the IP of the target can be crazy?

  Thanks in advance,

  Dave.

  Please see the latest posts by Dave and myself.

  Let me know if they help.

• Weird behavior of the router 871 on VPN tunnel

  Hi, I have established a tunnel VPN site to site with a cisco 871 to a cisco 2800. This drug is right and work. So, what's the problem? Let's see:

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  !

  map SDM_CMAP_1 6 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  Description Numintel

  defined by peer 213.192.208.242

  86400 seconds, life of security association set

  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

  match address 100

  !

  Archives

  The config log

  hidekeys

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0

  !

  interface FastEthernet1

  !

  interface FastEthernet2

  !

  interface FastEthernet3

  !

  interface FastEthernet4

  IP 196.12.229.218 255.255.255.252

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto

  !

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.169.15.100 255.255.255.0

  no ip redirection

  no ip proxy-arp

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 196.12.229.217

  !

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  the IP nat inside source 1 list the interface FastEthernet4 overload

  !

  access-list 1 local observation

  access-list 1 permit 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  The thing is that when I apply list local access, lo leave the 192.169.15.0 guests have access to the internet, I can't reach the other end of the tunnel. (Say ping at 192.168.3.35). When I disable local access list: access-list 1 permit ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255, the tunnel works. I can access the other end of the tunnel of any of the hosts to 192.169.15.0, but I don't have access to the internet. Can someone explain what is happening and how to fix? Thank you.

  Hello

  You have to do traffic IPsec NAT of derivation. Traffic IPsec must be denied in the access list. Use extended access list example:

  access-list 120 deny ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 120 deny ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 120 allow ip 192.169.15.0 0.0.0.255 any

  IP nat inside source interface FastEthernet4 list 120 overload

  HTH

  Sangaré

  Pls rate helpul messages

• Separate the internet access and VPN traffic

  Hello everyone!

  I have a VPN Client that connect with the office, the vpn works great. Now all traffic, including internet´s access goes through the tunnel. I would separate it, I know I can use a split tunnel, but does not work for me.

  Here is the config:

  internal remote group strategy
  Group remote attributes policy
  value of 192.168.0.11 WINS server
  Server DNS 192.168.0.13 value
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  Split-tunnel-policy excludespecified
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list Accesso_Restringido
  XXXX.xxx value by default-field

  Accesso_Restringido list extended access denied object-group ip VPN remote everything

  Any idea?

  Concerning

  KC

  You should ignore the NAT for traffic between the vpn to the DMZ network client

  1 remove the following text

  No inside_nat0_outbound access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list allow 255.255.0.0 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

  2. Add the following

  permit dmz_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (DMZ) 0-list of access dmz_nat0_outbound