RV042 Dual WAN Port DMZ not acquire an IP from ISP

Similar Questions

• RV042 dual wan port forwarding challenge

  I have the latest firmware for this router. Here's what I want to do.

  WAN1 is connected to our primary ISP and has a static IP address. We pass a bunch of ports to our SBS 2003 for VPN server and the purpose of remote desktop. Redirect us P - FTP and FTP ports to another computer on the domain to use as FTP server, and we have access to this computer directly from our office as a mapped drive.

  WAN2 is connected to our secondary ISP that has a static IP address. I want to forward ports 80 and 443 of this connection to our FTP server (which has the internal IP address of 192.168.1.21) as well for this same computer can host our project Web site without needing us to get another computer that we would have to have in the office.

  This doesn't seem to be easily possible with the RV042.  I am open to any suggestions on how I can do that; I have another router I could throw into the mix if that would solve the problem.

  In fact, there to make a NAT on a public IP address to match an internal IP address of your choice.  I used the static IP address of the second internet connection and mapped it to our FTP server.

  The only downside is that the FTP server is no longer protected by the firewall, so I had to install a software firewall to protect it from the outside world ;-)

• R7000 WAN Port does not use LAN as a substitute?

  I have a problem with my R7000. The WAN port is dead. I used it in access point mode for some time connected to one of my LAN ports, but I need to go back to a main router. Is it possible to run it in router mode outside of a LAN port, or I'm out of options and need to replace the router? Past the WAN port, everything works fine. Thank you!

  Ive never used Merlin, but I think you need to activate the dual WAN mode and just use the secondary interface for your main WAN while leaving the other disconnected.

• LRT224 - Dual WAN port forwarding

  Can you move forward say port 80 1 Wan IP and port 80 from WAN 2 to a different IP address. ?

  Also can you somehow choose TCP & UDP rather large only one or the other?

  I just replaced 2 routers with LRT 214 and LRT 224 TPLink its all works well. Except port forwarding

  With LRT224, a port forwarding rule is applied to the two WAN ports and two rules are necessary if you want to ship to TCP and UDP to the same internal IP address.

• RV042 dual wan vpn

  Hi all

  I have the cisco RV042 vpn router. I have 1 mb lease line in my office and around 15 to 20 users. can I use this Rv042 vpn router to share internet in my office .i need not creat vpn and all. I want only internet share in my .will be only desktop support?

  Hi chandrakant,.

  Thanks for posting your question. You want to share internet with your employees? If so, yes it is supported. You can plug the switch into the router and plug your PC used in the switch. All users will have access to the internet.

• RV042 different internal port on a port forward?

  I would like to set up some redirects the monitoring SNMP port, but some of my devices cannot be changed from the default port 161. Is is possible to configure a port forward for, say, port 171 who goes to a port internal 161?

  Hi Justin,

  Not on the RV042 it only can carry the port 161 for example forward, and do not change this destination port number.

  But if you need dual WAN ports with this feature, why not try its big brother, the series SA500.

  If you don't need dual WAN port and only need a single WAN port with this feature check out the RV120W or the old RVS4000.

  I've included a few screenshots below show the required functionality on first a SA500 and then on a RV120W

  I need to define the service, I have not done in the examples below.

  But I can before UDP or TCP ports regardless of the port, say 171 to a host IP LAN and translate the port to 161.

  

  Screenshot on SA500

  

  screenshot from a RV120W

  Sorry Justin, may not be the answer you want to hear.

  Best regards, Dave

• com ports are not not in Device Manager

  Windows Vista Ultamate

  I need to find what my gps device usb com port is turned on and set manually baud rate etc.
  Went to control panel option "Hardware and sound" not shown.
  Find Device Manager via "system" in the control panel but "ports" were not.

  Apart from evolution into another version of windows, what should I do

  You can add Ports manually via the control panel "Add Hardware". In the Add Wizard of material, choose the option "Install the hardware that I manually select from the list (user)" then click on the button "next".  Under "Common hardware Types" scroll down and clilck on Ports (COM & LPT) click the button "Next" and complete the wizard.

• LAN/WAN ports not supposed to be Gigabit? Capped at 250Mbps, NOT because of the ISP LAN devices.

  Hi all

  Have a bit of a problem here. I have Internet Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) with Bell Canada and have their Fibe Gigabit service which is 940/120 speeds up and down, respectively. I was able to bypass his combo modem/router using a switch connected to the optical network terminal (HAVE) where the fiber cable enters the House (which serves mainly my base modem) and using custom settings of VLAN and DNS in ports specific for my fiber IPTV service Bell and receivers work together through my router.

  So, I have a few routers that I tried this with to try to solve my problem. My Asus RT-AC5300 and others have no problem with having me my subscribed speed - certainly through devices connected to gigabit LAN and also via WiFi on compatible devices. But I'm not concerned about WiFi - it is specifically wired ethernet devices that are the cause. I use CAT5e and CAT6 cables only because he is a Gigabit connection. The issue I have with my Time Capsule (3 to, latest model AC) is that, literally, speeds for gigabit wired devices will not exceed 250Mbps downstream. Download speeds can hit 125Mbps without problem. Why is this? Is there something my Time Capsule prevents leave the LAN ports operating at gigabit full transfer speed? It is not only a device - I have multiple gigabit devices I tested, on all three of the TC ports, and none of them exceed 250Mbps. Yet when I connect them to another router gigabit, such as the Asus I've described but also others, they have no problem hitting 900 + Mbps downstream on the exact same network configuration and Setup at home.

  Thanks for any ideas, comments or suggestions. Y at - it a setting I have accidentally enabled that is the cause? I had much rather use the TC of the most convenient airport for my network I was planning on getting multiple Airport extreme to position around the House to cover literally home WiFi and LAN bridges through the simple installation of these devices, but I do if I can't use my fiber subscribed speed.

  OR maybe I have a defective unit. Thanks again for the help!

  See you soon

  The issue I have with my Time Capsule (3 to, latest model AC) is that, literally, speeds for gigabit wired devices will not exceed 250Mbps downstream. Download speeds can hit 125Mbps without problem. Why is this?

  Apple AirPort routers have been designed to work with the cable standard and DSL connections.  The fiber is the new ball game, and Apple knows yet how to play the game, let alone to understand the rules.

  Most of the problems associated with connections to high speed on airports is a result of the decision of Apple to eliminate any kind of manual settings to manually adjust the speed of the WAN port on the router... and are based rather on an "Auto" setting.  Automatic adjustment seems to work pretty well on the fiber up to approximately 100 Mbps connections, but the WAN port is struggling to negotiate with high-speed connections when it is connected directly to the fiber. LAN ports can also be affected.

  Some users have reported that insert a Gigabit switch between the connection of the fiber and the Time Capsule or AirPort Extreme has helped with speeds. The theory here is that the switch can negotiate with the fiber connection much better than the WAN port on the Apple device.  If you have a handy Gigabit Ethernet switch, that it could not hurt to try this "Workaround".  Other users report no benefit when they try it.

  Yet when I connect them to another router gigabit, such as the Asus I've described but also others, they have no problem hitting 900 + Mbps downstream on the exact same network configuration and Setup at home.

  The time Capsule is not directly connected to the fiber connection, so it OK to talk and negotiate with what he sees as a 'normal' a conventional router connection.

  Don't forget also that the 802.11ac products were designed before 2013. Current products have not changed since their introduction in June 2013.

  The bottom line... Apple needs to decide whether it wants to be an actor, or leave the routing other players company established. Such what, Apple is far behind the curve... my opinion.

  While it might not hurt to take the time Capsule to an Apple Store to check over the machine, you might want to ensure that they have in fact a fiber connection high speed to test.

• RV180 getting is not gigabit/1000 WAN port speed

  I have my RV180 connected to a modem Motorola SB6121 cable into the WAN port. The modem indicates that the connection to the router is only 10/100. If I plug my laptop directly into the cable modem, it indicates that the connection is full gigabit.

  RV180 configuration, less Networking > port management, the WAN (Internet) port is enabled and Full Duplex value and speed of 1000. Auto-negotiation and flow control are unchecked. I also changed the WAN port for auto-negotiation and restarted the RV180. But none of these settings seem to affect the speed detected on the modem end. He always shows a light orange Link that says 10/100Base-T, instead of a blue light of the link indicating full 1000Base-T.

  Am I missing another setting somewhere, or is there another reason why the modem insists that the connection to the router is only 10/100?

  If I plugged my laptop into the RV180 rouoter's WAN port, I do not see how that would be a proper test.
  

  Then two different cables do you use?  The reason why I ask because there are some cables Cat5/Cat6 "shonky" that are not properly completed.  If they are properly finished cables, you can obtain 1 Gbps.  If this isn't the case, you will get 100 Mbps.

• When you run XP mode USB ports will not accept XP drivers or if they remain Windows 7? Should I really go to a Dual Boot System?

  I am running Windows 7 Professional.  I have a piece of equipment that has only Windows XP drivers, I desperately need to work.  I read up on top of the virtual systems and XP mode.

  When you run XP mode USB ports will not accept XP drivers or if they remain Windows 7? Should I really go to a Dual Boot System?

  Thank you

  Andrew

  You must attach the USB device to Virtual PC XP Mode: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/824369

• Dual WAN router and protocol binding

  Hello! I'm trying to find a dual WAN router with support VPN, which allow me to redirect part of the traffic to a specific port WAN and balancing of this specific traffic in the case of this WAN failure (the latter is preferred but is not entirely necessary) load.

  RV042/G could help me with this? In this case, allow redirection Protocol only? What port/ip forwarding? Or some sort of filtering of packets to redirect to specific WAN ports?

  Maybe I need another router in the conduct of business?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi Jose, RV0XX model (g) supports a protocol source LAN link to extended network destination set. It can be a host of high-end LAN or a single host LAN. It may be the customer service or all services. In the case of a failure of network SCOPE, all links in the Protocol are "ignored" and switch to the active WAN until normal operation is restored.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV082, Dual Wan, VPN + protocol bindings

  Hi all

  I have this kind of Setup and I can't figure out how to think this router.

  My Installer uses Dual Wan load balancing mode. I only need one VPN tunnel. High availability is my concern.

  Site 1 has fiber and Cable

  Site 2A cable and FTTN

  Each ISP provides a static IP

  VPN works very well in the event of failure. I am always disappointed that it works in the case where a single primary WAN breaks, but is not operational if primary WAN on Site 1 stops at the same time secondary Site WAN 2 stops. It is very rare but can happen.

  In any case, my problems are where I need binding protocol to ensure secure WEB (https, banking, portal provider) sessions.

  I bind, at the least, port 443 to my primary WAN. In this way, I can access the Web sites and keep me logged.

  So, if I browse a HTTPS across the VPN server, binding protocol always attempts to pass port 443 by the WAN1. He will not even consider the VPN as a valid route first.

  (Maybe) can problem I reduce Hop Count for Site 2 less than 35?     P.S. I replaced the addresses I don't think they are relevant.

  Destination IP Subnet mask Default gateway Number of hops Interface

  ADDR network WAN2 255.255.255.252 * 0 eth2 WAN1 network addr 255.255.255.248 * 0 eth1 Site 2 255.255.255.0 Site 1 fiber Gateway 35 eth1 Site 1 255.255.255.0 * 0 eth0 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 15 eth1 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 cable WAN2 40 eth2 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 40 eth1

  Thank you all,

  Bruno

  I would like to conclude this is a bug and requires further investigation. I wouldn't call it a limitation if it was my decision (not that I have so much importance in this regard)

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Second Airport Extreme in Bridge mode, ethernet ports does not

  I have two routers, I want to use. The first is a time Capsule (old model 2 TB) connected to a single cable modem. The second is an Airport Extreme (also a little older, the 'flat' last body model until they began to sell towers). Both have the 7.6.4 firmware.

  The problem is that I want to use the second to extend my network, but I don't want to use wifi. I have the second of the WAN port connected via an Ethernet cable to the network served by the time Capsule, but when I launch the extreme in Bridge mode with a Mac Pro plugged into one of the ports ethernet to the extreme, it says it is not connected to the net.

  Y at - there a trick to getting the second router work ports ethernet when used in this way?

  Thanks in advance!

  Deleted message, thread posted by mistake.

• The WAN Port is communicating with the Ethernet switch?

  I have a Comcast gateway that the router is disabled in so it acts only as a modem. This is related to an Airport Extreme, which serves as my router via the WAN on the AE port. I created a different WAP with a Capsule temporal from the airport, located downstairs with an Ethernet cable from one of the Ethernet ports on the AE to the WAN on the TC port. I think it's what we call a 'roaming network.

  My question is, can I connect my switch Gigabit 8 ports in one of the Ethernet ports on the TC to complete connections wired to all devices connected on it, or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the port WAN TC to complete my network "roaming"? In other words, plug it into the port WAN AE or TC still allows you to use other Ethernet ports as a switch?

  Thank you!

  can I plug my Gigabit 8 ports switch in one of the ports Ethernet on the TC to complete wired connections to all devices connected on it

  Yes, assuming that the TC has been configured to run in Bridge Mode, which would be normal.

  or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the TC WAN port to complete my network "roaming"?

  It would be considered preferable to wiring, if it is convenient to do so.  For example, in the configuration of the wiring in the previous example just above... If there is a problem with the time Capsule, then all devices connected to the switch to the time Capsule would have a problem as well.

  If the switch is connected to the AirPort Extreme, and the TC is then connected to the switch... If the TC has a problem, the other devices connected to the switch of will not be affected.

• lrt224 dual wan router

  Hi im new in dual wan configuration. Help, please.
  Here is my problem

  1 dynamic globe telecom primary WAN
  WAN static pldt 2 telecom
  Link failover mode

  1 router is connect to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin for wifi wireless
  1 cctv dvr connected to port 9000 webport lrt224 9100 with auto detection parameters parameters

  Now:
  Sometimes cctv camera released to public ip address when the wan2 switch but sometimes cannot show also
  All around, with 1 wan dynamic as primary

  Hi @engkanto.net,.

  I agree with the suggestions. It is best to connect the IP camera to one of the LRT224 router's Ethernet ports. Then you must configure the Port Forwarding or Port Address Translation If you have more than one camera using the same internal port.

  Thank you.