RV220W - rules of access/redirection of port with multiple WAN IP addresses

Similar Questions

• Cisco SRP 521W with multiple WAN IP addresses

  Hi all

  I have an unusual scenario that may require the use of a SRP 521W-, the scenario is as follows:

  Temporary installation:

  • Cisco 857 ADSL router until the Ethernet Hand-off is installed
  • Several IPS delivered on the ADSL WAN service
  • Cisco 857 in Bridge Mode and connected to the WAN - SRP 521W port
  • Cisco 521W manages authentication and routing
  • Check Point Firewall system connected to SRP 521W LAN-1
  • Check Point Firewall has IP WAN 203.XXX.XXX.XXX
  • Cisco UC-540W connected to SRP 521W LAN-2
  • Cisco UC-540W has 203.XX WAN IP. XX. XX

  If you understand the situation described above, I'm curious to know if this is possible and if so how? I need a totally separate networks and the only thing they have in common is the Cisco SRP 521W.

  It is also worth noting that the SRP 521W is used because the ADSL service is only temporary, while the fiber build is complete and the carrier provides an Ethernet Hand-Off, then Internet service will change to this type of presentation and the ADSL router will be relegated in the dark loneliness world.

  I went through the router and have been playing around with the settings, the problem is that I have nothing in LABORATORY work more that can I would like to reproduce this environment and test it before deployment... SO I hope someone can help to shed light on this case in order to reduce the amount of trail and error, I have to meet to operate.

  For any help or suggestion is appreciated.

  See you soon,.

  David.

  Hi David,

  Is your PC provides you with all the public addresses within the same subnet?  that is the WAN IP of the router is part of the same subnet as the address 203.x.x.x?  Or well, is separately assigned WAN address?

  If the addresses are all part of the same subnet, I fear the SRP520 will not support what you are trying to do - this product does not support the concept of a single address on the WAN port forwarding/DMZ use.

  If the sunet inside is routed via the WAN address, then it should be possible to turn NAT and attack the VLAN local accordingly.

  PS: The SRP541 host multiple WAN addresses for port forwarding/DMZ.

  Kind regards

  Andy

• How to access the PDB (s) with multiple shared users?

  is it possible to access the PDB files with multiple shared users?

  Consider the scenario:

  I have two common user:-c# a PDB and c ##b:-PDBTEST

  I am facing problem:

  When I connect with the common user - c ##b, I am not able to see the table of PDBTEST created by connecting you with c# a.

  However, I have assigned rights in PDBTEST for both users c# a and c ##b.

  For the common c ##b user, is there another way, I can access PDBTEST?

  I'm following measures:

  Connect as sysdba

  1 > created two user c# a and c ##b (container = ALL)

  2 > common role granted with all privileges: c ##role (container = ALL)

  3 > assigned c ##role both user: c# a and c ##b (container = ALL)

  4 > created PDB: PDBTEST

  Changed session and containing value = PDBTEST

  5 > granted c ##role to two users: c# a and c ##b inside the PDBTEST

  6 > connect with c# a (and not as sysdba)

  Changed session and containing value = PDBTEST

  7 > table created and inserted record: TestTable

  8 > connection with c ##b (and not as sysdba)

  Changed session and containing value = PDBTEST

  I'm not able to access the record of "TestTable" after you connect with c ##b...

  Even more, if I connect with c# a, I can access inserted records.

  Help, please.

  Hi Big Boss,

  It has nothing to do with the PDB, it is just the works of oracle way - to query a table that belongs to another yo uhave to precede their schema name unless you do one of 2 things

  (1) create a synonym (public or private) for their purpose

  (2) use alter session set current_schema

  So in your case you'd be (both logged in as ##b c)

  (1) create synonym c# table_name #a.table_name;

  (2) alter session set current_schema = c# a;

  Now, if you say

  Select * from table_name as c ##b it will work.

  (1) is permanent

  (2) must be adjusted each time you connected

  I think you're confusing a pdb with a schema file.

  See you soon,.

  Rich

• What does this mean and how to fix: the router address you entered is not compatible with your WAN IP address.

  I connect to an access provider via Airport Extreme, which is extended through two Airport Express.  When I try to edit anything in one of these devices, even a name, I get this message: "you have entered the address of the router is not compatible with your WAN IP address.  My connection seems to work, but there is clearly something wrong with her.  The Express has no DNS and will not update without the same message.  I have no idea what this is all about and will greatly appreciate the ideas.

  This means that WAN Setup does not or does not install across the network.

  The best way to solve this problem is beginning on...

  Reset all three at the factory and reconfigure each in turn. Do the extreme first and make sure it works... Then add the express.

  If you need help with that we will need to know which modem or modem router to your ISP gave you and possibly the type of services to wide band... and who is the provider.

  Give us screenshots of each installer as you do.

• I'm waiting times tries to access a parallel port with VISA

  I get VISA time-out errors when you try to write to the parallel port. MAX said that the port works and I should be able to communicate with him. Device Manager Windows 2000 also said that the device works. I use writing to the parallel port with VISA example I found on the site of nor. To make it even more confusing (or), it runs on one computer but not another. All software and drivers are the same on both machines. On one who gives me the error of time-out, I am able to write to the parallel port using "accesshw".

  What a coincidence. The computer that I had problems with is also a Dell Optiplex. The pins of wiring together the way that you have specified has solved my problem of timeout. The cable I got with just bad has terminals 11 and 12 low attached as indicated on the page with a link to the code sample titled "with the help of VISA to access the Parallel Port in LabVIEW" I know why the original cable worked with a bridge but not a Dell Optiplex. Thanks for the quick fix!

• Desktop remote access simultaneously in windows with multiple session in Windows Server 2008 support?

  I would like to have a remote desktop solution that allows me to connect to remote computers even while users are connected, with the help of another session. The idea is that the user working locally in the remote system can function normally undisturbed by the remote user. I have tried TightVNC , but I couldn't understand how to enter an independent session. I am using Windows Server 2008 and I want two users access to the server with two different sessions as remote users.

  There are forums dedicated to Windows Server, please transfer your question in the relevant Microsoft Technet forum here:

  http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-us/category/windowsserver .

  Thank you.      :)

  (I'm sorry, but I can't move this thread for you because the two forums are working on separate platforms)

• SRW248G4 switches - link particular port with a particular ip address

  Dear Sir.

  Please tell me how I can bind IP specific with particular port so another ip address cannot work on this port.

  Please tell me solution for the same as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Thanks and greetings

  Chandra Prakash

  09829590021

  Hi gv.

  Thanks for the reply.

  I did not understand clearly.

  can u tell me step by step

  Thanks and greetings

  Chandra Prakash

  09829590021

• Several short pictures with multiple static IP addresses

  Hello

  I have the following problem:

  I created an Oracle Linux 64 - BIT image with short V3.1. I put the NAT network connection and only registered intellectual property in my Host file with my host name. Everything worked well, because I used a static IP address > as configured in the Host file and installed short later.

  But now, we would like to use this image for the training. So I would like to copy this image like 10 times and use static IP addresses for each image. BUT each image has a different static IP address.

  The problem to which I face today is that I can't connect to my server via the Terminal short or the Studio. The static IP address of one of my images is 172.31.10.20. I have configured my Host file like this:

  172.31.10.20 localhost.localdomain

  127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain

  Short server starts but I can't connect to it and get the message:

  "Could not connect to the server short at localhost:7001.

  Does anyone know how I can fix this problem so that I don't have to re - install short for each image?

  Thank you!!

  Marco

  Hi Marco,.

  Please see here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E40521_01/server.761/es_admin/toc.htm#Hostname%20resolution%20in%20the%20Endeca%20Server

• RV220W transfer of a range of ports

  How can we transfer a port range?

  Suppose that I have defined the following service:

  Service: TEST

  Port type: UDP

  From port: 5060

  End port: 5070

  and I want to send to a specific IP address. Then, if I create a new port forwarding rule for this service he asked me to specify a unique port number to be used internally as:

  Action: Always allow the

  Service: TEST

  Source IP: no

  Destination IP: 10.0.0.100

  Internal port:?

  I want to forward all ports 5060 to 5070 5060 to 5070 internal range.

  How can I do?

  I have the same problem with the duty to convey a range of ports to a single ip address. At the moment I can't put the rv220w in the network to test because we are in the middle of the day and I can't take the network down.

  Just a warning:

  * This has not been tested in an active network *.

  I've done the following:

  Go to the firewall.

  Access rules

  Add the new rule:

  Type of connection: incoming (wan (internet) > LAN (local area network))

  Action: Always allow the

  Service: 'TEST '.

  Source IP: no

  Send to the Server Local (DNAT IP): 10.0.0.100

  Press on save and it "appears" to work. Yet once I have not tested myself so just be careful because I don't know if it works correctly now. When I am able to put the router of the network and test this I will follow.

• RV180 need some advice/Suggestion regarding the rules of access and Services

  Hi, I expected to get some advice or suggestion with a RV180 question.  I have a cable modem connection that connects to my port WAN RV180 and we have a single static IP address on the WAN port and everything works great.  We have an internal Exchange Server, so we have a few inbound rules access allowing for ports 443 and 25.  It all works.

  This is the question that I encounter.  We have now another service internal now needs outside inside access on port 443 (https), but I already have this configuration on the router for Exchange and when I have both sense, of course, it won't work correctly because the router just takes the first rules of access and use the one that works very well for traffic Exchange , but not my other service.

  Is there another way to get this job where I can have two internal services on port 443 and the router can forward traffic appropriate to each of them since my first IP? (it doesn't really matter if I had two IP addresses because it always hits the same access list for internal services)

  All advice or suggestion would be great

  Hi, yours is a general networking, not specific to RV180 problem.

  As you have only one IP public (on the WAN port), you only have a single port 443, you can support two services outside-to-inside.

  The cheapest solution is one of the services to another port, if the service permits.

  The most expensive solution is to have public IP addresses.

• RV180 rules of access and NAT

  OK, I have a RV180 that I'm going to have some problems with access rules and one to one NAT.

  What I have is very basic with regard to needs. Outgoing Internet flows very well.

  I have an FTP server that does not use the WAN interface for the public IP address, so I created a One to One private NAT range Begin 192.168.8.28 for the inside address. I then enter the public IP 1.1.1.1 set the length of the range to 1 and the FTP service (also tried everything) and then saved.

  In my access rules I created and rule of incoming traffic always allow ANY for FTP

  192.168.8.28 is sent to the Server Local (DNAT IP)

  Use another WAN IP address is active and set to 1.1.1.1 and the rule is enabled

  No joy in the FTP connection and I don't see anything in the papers, showing the blocked port. What I'm missing here?

  After you configure a rule one by one, the outbound traffic is allowed by default and incoming traffic is allowed by the services defined in the one-to-one NAT rule.

• Issues of access to the port noticed when using wireshark

  1. I noticed CDP on wearing my workstation, I could see how this could be useful in using a sniffer to find out which port on a switch, you are connected to. I discovered running on this port without activating cdp avoid advertisements of cdp on port. Most of you turned it off or they leave?  If so is it a company policy to do?

  2. the next strange package race was spanning tree (BPDU?) packets, I saw.  I thought that this is coelio why would you see protocols spanning tree on an access port?  I used the command spanning tree bpudguard suggests that would prevent me from receiving bpdus on an access port.  This did not work, what order you we just to not receive bpdu?

  3. the last one is the one that I find it extremely odd that I receive eigrp Hello of my main switch this switch of access level. The eigrp should just broadcast to other switches running eigrp?

  Hello

  1, it depends. If you have Cisco phones, you have cdp enabled on the interfaces. If you don't use phones, you can disable cdp on the interfaces.

  2, Spanning-tree is a loop prevention mechanism. you want to use the tree covering all the interfaces where a loop can occur. You can introduce loops on the access port if you connect a switch on that port. A switch will always send packets bpdus on access ports unless you specifically configure the switch does not to do this. Spanning tree bpduguard is used to protect a port of bpdu packets. If a bpdu is received on a port with bpdu guard enabled, the port closes because it is an invalid configuration. BPDU guard does not filter packets bpdus on a port. If you want to filter packets bpdu on an interface, you use spanning tree bpdufilter. spanning tree bpdufilter stop bpdu packets sent on an interface.

  3, Hello Eigrp packet are sent on all interfaces enabled for eigrp. To prevent the eigrp packets out all interfaces running eigrp, use the passive-interface command in eigrp configuration.

  Thank you

  John

• Firepower does not work when using the Active Directory group as a rule filter access control

  I am PoV of Cisco ASA with the power of fire with my client. I would like to integrate the power of fire to MS Active Directory. Everything seems to work properly.

  -Fire power user agent installation to complete successfully. Connection to AD work fine. The newspaper is GREEN.

  -J' created a Kingdom in FireSight and you can download users and groups from Active Directory.

  -J' created a politics of identity with passive authentication (using the field I created)

  -Can I use the AD account "user" as a filter in access control rule and it work very well.

  However, if I create the rule of access control with AD Group', the rule never get match. I'm sure that the user that I test is a member of the group. Connection event show the system to ignore this rule and the traffic is blocked by the default action below. It doesn't look like the firepower doesn't know that the user belongs to the group.

  I use

  -User agent firepower for Active Directory v2.3 build 10.

  -ASA 5515 software Version 9.5 (2)

  -Fire version 6.0.0 - 1005 power module

  -Firepower for VMWare Management Center

  Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  You should check the download user under domain option. Download the users once belonging to a group is specified on the ad and then test the connection.

  Thank you

  Yogesh

• Control access to the network with ACS device

  Hi all!

  I currently have in place an Appliance, Cisco Secure ACS using Windows as main server authentication. Cisco Secure acts as a GANYMEDE server +. I have two groups defined in Cisco Secure: Netadmins and security ITD. Users of the Netadmins group need access to all switches and routers on the network. ITD security must only access async line 53 on a router 2611 for a band of a firewall and no other access to all network devices offline. How can I limit access to the Cisco Secure security ITD group to line 53 only?

  My current config on this router is:

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login netadmins group Ganymede + line

  connection ITDSEC authentication group Ganymede + line of AAA.

  RADIUS-server host 10.30.X.X

  RADIUS-server host 10.18.X.X

  key radius-server XXXXXXX

  line 53

  No exec

  authentication of the connection ITDSEC

  transport of entry all

  StopBits 1

  Speed 115200

  line vty 0 4

  exec-timeout 30 0

  login timeout 120 response

  login authentication netadmins

  but users in the ITD security can still access by vty and then reverse telnet to any asynchronous line on the router. In addition, security ITD always access any switch or router using telnet: what should be my setup on these devices? I do an ACS configuration?

  All other devices:

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login netadmins group Ganymede + line

  RADIUS-server host 10.30.X.X

  RADIUS-server host 10.18.X.X

  key radius-server XXXXXXX

  Line con 0

  password 7 141C015C5806

  login authentication netadmins

  line vty 0 4

  password 7 11020A 524310

  login authentication netadmins

  line vty 5 15

  password 7 11020A 524310

  login authentication netadmins

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  In the security group, I would create a Restriction of access to IP network with an entry permit. Essentially to allow access to the single port on 2611 only.

  The AAA Client field is the name that you gave to the 2611 in the network config. Address will be * unless you want to restrict access to the ip or address. Port... never quite sure with async if the port value must be "async 53" or "line 53".

  If you look in the pass/fail for the nas-port attribute, you'll see what that T + sends to the ACS. This should help you know what to put in the NAR.

  Mounira

• ports access the trunk ports - no (or minimal) downtime

  Take even for someone and not an expert, so forgive me if it's pretty simple.  I did a lot of research and that you have yet to see a response.

  There are 4 hosts in a cluster - Nutanix - are NETWORK adapter, all in 1 GB ports in a single switch for a subnet (let's call him. 128/25) currently configured as access ports - no VLAN ID is set to the vm network ports and we use standard vswitches.  The port group is called "VM Network".

  I have 8 new ports on two physical switches now configured with sheath with VLAN ID and 4 VLAN that will be needed in this cluster - where the change.  One of the seront.128/25 subnets I noted above.

  If I leave a host, move cables and configure the port groups for each of the 4 subnets calling prod1 thanks prod4, once the host starts the marking of the packages I will able to vmotion for the new configuration, host of one of the other three?

  Thank you

  Mike

  

  Since you can't computers vMotion virtual from one host to another if the port group name is different, my recommendation is:

  1 evacuate VMs to host you want to create new groups of port with tagging VLAN;

  2. create new groups of port with the appropriate names and VLAN.

  3. on the host without tagging VLANS, create groups of ports but without VLAN.

  4. change the network interface virtual VM on the new appropriate port group;

  5. the virtual machines to the new host of vMotion.