SatelliteL755 - 2.4 GHz i5 processor performance index fell

Similar Questions

• In Windows experience Index of my computer's processor performance are increased from 5.8 to 4.7.How can I increase this?

  This Windows experience index per second processor calculations

  1 don't get too concerned about the experience index itself, the methods used to determine these scores is rather crude and produce no good empirical results and should be used only as a general guide.

  Also, the algorithms used are sometimes modified to allow changes in the technology available so can produce slightly different results from a previous run.

  Finally even if the utility is supposed to be able to compensate for other tasks, so it can be influenced by other processor loads may produce lower figures. Make sure the system is in the same State when comparisons.

  Processor performance has limited options to improve. Have you ridden any new memory since the last test?

• Qosmio G50-12 X - Windows 7 performance index decreased

  After having changed the HARD and WIN7 32-bit drive to SSD and Win7 64 bit Windows Experience Index decreased:
  for processor - 6.1 to 3.9
  for memory (RAM) - 5.9-4.5.

  This isn't good, is it?
  Does anyone know what might be a reason?
  Does anyone have the same problem?

  All the official drivers for Win7 64 (chipset, video, etc.), tried to install different versions for other OS-did not help.
  PC: Qosmio G50-12 X (PQG55E).

  You have changed the system to 32 bit to 64 bit.
  There is a difference between 64-bit and 32-bit system and therefore the performance index will also be different.

  To be honest, I don t care about clean internal Windows experience index.
  Firstly this Index isn't very useful because any change in the system may affect the unique results. So the results are not very significant.

  If you want to get more details about Windows 7 performance index, I recommend this MS site:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/Windows-experience-index

  However, the upgrade of the SSD HARD drive is the best decision you could ever made.
  I also changed the HARD drive to SSD drive and the performance gain is huge

• Satellite P200-1FZ: Question about Vista performance index?

  I recently bought a P200D-128 announced as having 256 MB of memory graphic dedicated only to find only has a HD2400 with 128 MB card (the name must have been an idea, I know).

  I was looking for a model with 256 MB I had read that it was recommended for good graphics performance in Vista.
  On the P200-128 model Vista performance index showed:

  Processor: 4.8
  Memory: 5.9
  Graphics: 3.3
  Games graphics: 3.7
  Hard drive: 5.2

  If the overall score of 3.3 seems not be limited by the graphics performance.

  I now plans to upgrade this model to a P200-1FZ (which has a HD2600 with 256 MB memory card), but would like to know if it significantly improves the score of graphics and Vista performance index.

  If anyone has this model (or a relative) and could tell me the VEI score, I would be very grateful.

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Just FYI: I Satellite P200D-111 with ATI Mobility Radeon X 2600 almost 5 months now. I use Vista Home Premium and to be honest, I'm quite satisfied with the performance of Vista. Up to now, I also tested with several games such as Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty 4, El Matador and older games like FarCry and Max Payne 2 WXP. It works perfectly.

  I like Call of Duty 4. He funs all simply fantastic. I do not even use complete running. At the moment I think to upgrade RAM to have better running OS. in the end, I can say one thing: for the reasonable price, I have large notebook.

  Good bye

• Satellite A100 - low Windows Vista performance index

  Hey there,

  I bought a Toshiba Satellite A100 just for more than a year now with Vista Home Premium. I recently formatted the laptop and installed Vista Business. When I got Home Premium, my 'Windows experience index' (found in Control Panel > system) has been a 3.0 for the graphics. Under Business, is however now that 1.0. I guess that it has not detected the graphics hardware on my laptop.

  How do it detects hardware?

  > I guess that it has not detected the graphics hardware on my laptop.

  I put t know what do you say that it has not detected the graphic material, but you should definitely check out if the graphic and other driver drivers Toshiba have been installed on your laptop properly.

  In addition, the Windows Vista experience index can change and can go down if more programs are installed on the system.
  I noticed that my Windows Vista performance index decreases every time if a 3rd party application has been installed and then removed from the system.

  In my opinion, Windows Vista index experience might be less because you have installed a newer version of the Vista operating system which contains functions of Vista more and so would need of more resources.

  Best regards

• Performance index Windows sides my RAM at 5.5, how can I increase this score.

  I have Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit, and the performance index scores my RAM to 5.5 (lowest score).  I have 4 GB of RAM installed, which is the maximum 32-bit windows can use.  Because a maxed out what's a low score?

  -Mike

  Because it has to do with the amount of RAM you have, but rather that it's good. What you have in your computer is probably some 800 MHz RAM, which is realitivly slow compared to my 1600 MHz... that is much faster.

• Insert / * + parallel * / performance index

  Insert / * + parallel * / performance index

  Hello

  I performed the procedure below

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE bulk_collect

  IS

  SID TYPE TABLE IS NUMBER;

  Screated_date TYPE IS an ARRAY OF DATE;

  Slookup_id TYPE TABLE IS NUMBER;

  Surlabasedesdonneesdufabricantduballast ARRAY TYPE IS VARCHAR2 (50);

  l_sid sid;

  l_screated_date screated_date;

  l_slookup_id slookup_id;

  l_sdata surlabasedesdonneesdufabricantduballast;

  l_start NUMBER;

  BEGIN

  l_start: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_time;

  SELECT id, created_date, lookup_id, data

  BULK COLLECT INTO l_sid, l_screated_date, l_slookup_id, l_sdata

  FROM big_table;

  -dbms_output.put_line (' after collection in bulk: ' | systimestamp);

  FORALL indx IN l_sid. FIRST... l_sid. LAST

  INSERT / * + parallel (big_table2, 2) * / INTO big_table2 values (l_sid (indx), l_screated_date (indx), l_slookup_id (indx), l_sdata (indx));

  -dbms_output.put_line (' after FORALL: ' | systimestamp);

  COMMIT;

  Dbms_output.put_line ('Total elapsed:-' |) (DBMS_UTILITY.get_time - l_start) | "hsecs");

  END;

  /

  DISPLAY ERRORS;

  I want to confirm if the query is running in parallel. I checked the tables below to confirm if the insert statement is run in parallel, but none of them returns all the rows.

  Select * from V$ PX_SESSION where sid = 768

  Select * from V$ PX_SESSTAT

  Select * from V$ PX_PROCESS

  Select * from V$ PX_PROCESS_SYSSTAT

  Select * from V$ PQ_SESSTAT

  Please may I know how to find out the parallel execution of / * + parallel (table_name, 2) * / reference

  Thank you

  I'd go for the SQL insert/selection option as suggested.

  Bulk insert is the APPEND_VALUES of 11r2 trick that will lead to a direct path load. Parallel is to directly load path, but if you are bench marking may include this as an additional test.

• window performance index became weak

  window performance index became weak, initial 5.1 2.3

  I3, first generation system, kernel x 64 bit win 7 home base, 4 GB ram, 500 GB hard drive512 map chart

  any help, suggestion

  Thank you

  Hello

  Update driver for graphics card can help. What is your computer and its operating system?

  Kind regards.

• Processor under-score in performance index Windows has decreased.

  My WEI score fell from 5.0 to 3.3. Mainly due to the reduction of processor under-score (3.3). I have an Intel (r) Core i3 CPU M370 @ 2.40 GHz processor. The drop came after I updated my NVIDIA Geforce driver version and updated the score...

  My subscores are
  3.3
  5.4
  5.0
  5.9
  5.7
  Please help me...!

  Probably you updated the driver through windows update or in the Nvidia support pages?

  If theres a comment from info on stateing Nvidia site that mobile device drivers are pilots and pilots of reference should come from the machine to the laptop, in your case, Lenovo, then reinstall from Lenovo support pages

• Search for compounding and return processor & Performance

  Hi all

  We must use Lookup from 2 to 5 and processors return in each of our 16 lots. A couple of batch processing about 700K records per day.

  To reduce clutter, I think create a processor research and personalized return (containing 5 processors Lookup and return and processor attribute merge at the end to combine the outputs of each processor search/return).

  In some of the processes, I can't use all the 5 research as input for the custom processor. My understanding of article - creating processors , all stages of the research will be always executed for all records even if some of the entries have the value NULL in accordance with the instruction-

  "the value of the attribute will be considered as zero in the logic of the processor.

  Can I create more than one processor for each research/back number 1 2, research/back 3, etc and use them in my process or compounding of processors will have a negligible performance impact?

  Also think about composition processors to add an attribute, believe this won 't a lot of impact on performance if I use not all entries.

  Kind regards

  Vivek

  1. research and return is generally effective in performance. If the research is external, make sure that you have indexes on columns of search.

  2. 5 searches in a batch is not uncommon.

  3 5 to put in a composed robot research is fine and will have no impact on performance.

  4. If you do not every 5 to run according to the given conditions, you can model this in your process of / processor, for example by using no. Data Check not to records of the road to one of the controls. Make sure that you join all records after passing different paths (the attributes of fusion will be this beautiful.)

  5. as you say, adding attributes will not add any significant performance overhead. What makes them in a processor made up makes no difference to performance.

• 1801 - Microcode Patch error after upgrading D310v EVO 1.7 GHz Celeron processor Celeron 2.8 GHz

  I replaced my processor, as described and on startup, I get the "1801 - Microcode Patch error...". "mssg telling me to 'contact' Compaq for a new ROM BIOS to take in charge the new stepping. I have to push 'F1' at startup, then it starts and runs significantly faster than before the upgrade. I found the BIOS upgrades to the HP site but I cannot know which is correct. I've tried a couple and nothing happened after downloading; How will I know which is the right one, how to throw, etc? Can damage my computer if I run that badly?

  Hello:

  I'm sure that a Pentium 4 processor 2.8/533/512 will work fine with your current configuration to 95%.

  Certainly better than celery.  I even think that the P4 2.4/533/512 would be better than celery 2.8.

  But go for the P4 2.8. They should be cheap and abundant.

  Just check you get one with the FSB 533 and 512 KB of L2, FSB 800 or 1 MB L2 cache cache, or it won't work.

  It's one you need - and the cheapest I could find - buy - it now.

  http://www.eBay.com/ITM/SL6PF-2-80-GHz-Intel-Pentium-4-processor-CPU-478-pin-/330678567620?PT=CPUs&hash=item4cfdfa82c4

  Paul

• improve windows performance index

  Please suggest how to improve the results for:

  1 performance for windows aero desktop

  the current score is 7.2. is there further scope for improvement, without compromising a lot on the way in which windows appear. from now the aero settings are set at: as recommended by windows

  2 3d graphics business and gamming

  the current score is 7.2, the system is with nvidia k2100m grahics card of 2 GB of memory dedicated. is there to provide for additional improvements?

  How to improve the performance of office for Windows Aero' void / score?   Answer Palcouk not really, without changing your vid card, assuming that it is a desktop computer

  J W Stuart You can check if you have the latest graphics driver installed. This may help a bit, but as mentioned Palcouk you must update the card to get the best scores.

  Note: The 2D under-score graphics are not as important as the score of the game if you are in the games.

  Visit the download of the manufacture of the graphics card: download and install the most recent Windows 7 drivers for your card.
  ATI: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx
  NVIDIA: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index5.aspx?lang=en-us

• Performance index Windows CPU drops with new hard drive installed on Windows Home Premium 64 bit.

  Hello world. I have a Toshiba laptop with Win 7 Home Premium 64-bit. 1 GB of GPU, 6 GB of ram, Intel i7 Q740 1.73 GHz. operating system has been pre-installed.

  The old hard drive was 600 GB 5400 RPM 8 MB Cache. The new disk of 1 TB 7200 RPM 32 MB Cache. With the old drive the cpu had index of the 7.1. With the new disc, he fell to 5.6. all the other components even rated the two discs. Both discs have a 512th form. Searched everywhere for an answer and would like an answer, cause im very curious and puzzled. Health perfect new drive using disk setiniel and crystal HD... info old drive had bad sectors, but cpu always valued at 7.1. If someone can answer, I would be very grateful.

  SV

  WEI is a completely arbitrary number and because it has been eliminated in the 8 win & win 10.  I would not be concerned about the number unless your computer is actually slower.  Your hard drive has nothing to do with the rating of the CPU.

• Performance index Windows of your system could not be calculated

  Hi guys,.

  I use a desktop with win-7(32bit) SP1.

  When I have one tries to use the option my computer, I get an error. I use Mcafee antivirus but I also tried to uninstall the antivirus but the same problem occurred.

  

  I tried to read its log (C:\Windows\Performance\WinSAT) file, but I am not able to understand a single word in the present. Can someone help me please. Here are the logs.

  27355758 (7528) - winsat\logging.cpp:0815:-START 2015\2\14 16:12:35 -
  27355758 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:4301: command line = "C:\Windows\system32\winsat.exe" formal - CancelEvent f97ddc8d-72e7-4947-b967-8c725ad8f3b6
  27355758 (7528) - winsat\processwinsaterror.cpp:0095: ERROR: tried to read resource strings, unknown exception occurred
  27355773 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:4474: > IsFormal is TRUE IsMoobe = FALSE.
  27355804 (7528) - 4585: Watch dog system active
  27355804 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:4600: watch dog timer 600.0 seconds hand
  27356070 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2490: > DWM running.
  27356194 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2497: > turn off DWM.
  27356194 (7528) - 2470: > EMD service will be restored to the exit.
  27357146 (7528) - 0983: > read the active power as «381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e» mode
  27357162 (7528) - 2793: > power policy saved.
  27357162 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2800: ERROR: cannot write to the registry of integrated security to ensure the food policy is restored.
  27357162 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2845: ERROR: failed to remove RunOnce Key
  27357224 (7528) - winsat\syspowertools.cpp:1015 >: 381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e value of the power system active"
  27357224 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2855: > state restored power.
  27357224 (7528) - winsat\main.cpp:2870: > Successfully reenabled EMD.
  27357240 (7528) - winsat\watchdog.cpp:0311: Watch dog system shutdown
  27357240 (7528) - 4909: > exit value = 1.

  27951338 (3528) - winsat\logging.cpp:0815:-START 2015\2\14 16:22:31 -
  27951338 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:4301: command line = "C:\Windows\system32\winsat.exe" formal - CancelEvent d3ebb439-11cc-409e-b605-e7bf66a8fd6b
  27951338 (3528) - winsat\processwinsaterror.cpp:0095: ERROR: tried to read resource strings, unknown exception occurred
  27951385 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:4474: > IsFormal is TRUE IsMoobe = FALSE.
  27951416 (3528) - 4585: Watch dog system active
  27951416 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:4600: watch dog timer 600.0 seconds hand
  27951697 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2490: > DWM running.
  27951869 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2497: > turn off DWM.
  27951869 (3528) - 2470: > EMD service will be restored to the exit.
  27952118 (3528) - 0983: > read the active power as «381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e» mode
  27952118 (3528) - 2793: > power policy saved.
  27952118 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2800: ERROR: cannot write to the registry of integrated security to ensure the food policy is restored.
  27952118 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2845: ERROR: failed to remove RunOnce Key
  27952181 (3528) - winsat\syspowertools.cpp:1015 >: 381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e value of the power system active"
  27952181 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2855: > state restored power.
  27952181 (3528) - winsat\main.cpp:2870: > Successfully reenabled EMD.
  27952196 (3528) - winsat\watchdog.cpp:0311: Watch dog system shutdown
  27952196 (3528) - 4909: > exit value = 1.

  28262373 (7072) - winsat\logging.cpp:0815:-START 2015\2\14 16:27:42 -
  28262373 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:4301: command line = "C:\Windows\system32\winsat.exe" formal - CancelEvent dbe386de-580d-4fea-b050-46be902070a8
  28262373 (7072) - winsat\processwinsaterror.cpp:0095: ERROR: tried to read resource strings, unknown exception occurred
  28262404 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:4474: > IsFormal is TRUE IsMoobe = FALSE.
  28262451 (7072) - 4585: Watch dog system active
  28262451 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:4600: watch dog timer 600.0 seconds hand
  28262716 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2490: > DWM running.
  28262888 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2497: > turn off DWM.
  28262888 (7072) - 2470: > EMD service will be restored to the exit.
  28263122 (7072) - 0983: > read the active power as «381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e» mode
  28263137 (7072) - 2793: > power policy saved.
  28263137 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2800: ERROR: cannot write to the registry of integrated security to ensure the food policy is restored.
  28263137 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2845: ERROR: failed to remove RunOnce Key
  28263184 (7072) - winsat\syspowertools.cpp:1015 >: 381b4222-f694-41f0-9685-ff5bb260df2e value of the power system active"
  28263184 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2855: > state restored power.
  28263184 (7072) - winsat\main.cpp:2870: > Successfully reenabled EMD.
  28263200 (7072) - winsat\watchdog.cpp:0311: Watch dog system shutdown
  28263200 (7072) - 4909: > exit value = 1.

  Hi Rohit,

  Thanks for posting your question on the Microsoft community.

  I would like to know some information about the problem so that we can help you better.

  1. What is the brand and model of your computer?
  2. is your computer connected to a domain network?

  Thank you to provide detailed information and screenshot of the question and your efforts

  the solution there.

  This problem may occur either corrupt drivers installed or due to missing or corrupted Windows files.

  I would suggest trying the following methods and check if it helps.

  Method 1:
  Date of display drivers and chipset of your computer from the manufacturer's website and check.
  Refer to this article:
  Updated a hardware driver that is not working properly
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Update-driver-hardware-ISN

  If this does not help, use method 2.

  Method 2:
  Run the system file checker (SFC) and check the issue.
  Reference:
  Use the System File Checker tool to repair missing or corrupted system files
  http://Support2.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

  System File Checker is a Windows utility that allows users to find corruptions in Windows system files and restore the damaged files.

  See also:
  What is the Windows experience index?
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/what-is-Windows-experience-index#what-is-Windows-experience-index=Windows-7

  I hope this information helps.

  Please let us know if you need more help.

  Thank you

• WEI - the Windows of your system performance index could not be calculated.

  Hello

  Ive installed a clean copy of Windows7 64 bit, on a formatted hard drive. I am unable to execute WEI.

  I've updated the BIOS for my M3A79-T DELUXE for later (1303 rev). Installed the latest drivers for hardware and Windows was last updated.

  I ran CHKDSK/f/r/x c: (I saw on a Web site that's the problem for one person)

  checked everything is installed ok and there is no conflict in Device Manager.

  Index of Windows performance has a logfile '% SystemRoot%\Performance\WinSAT\winsat.log '. This can give a few pertinent details.

  I got the same error message and, in my case, the log file reported "Unable to save". He seems to have been Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 that blocked WEI to save the results. The full test of the WEI ran OK and even flashed-up the message 'done', but this was then immediately replaced with the message 'assessment could not be completed'... because he could not * recording * results.

  Can I suggest you try another AV package? If you disconnect the network cable, you can safely uninstall your existing AV package and see if WEI works again. If that solves it, perhaps you need another AV package in the future.

  Personally, I found that Microsoft Security Essentials seems not to have this issue and I can now my notes again. But I can try a few other (try before you buy) packages to see which is better.

  Worth a try?

  Keith.