Save entire hierarchy LV 6i

Similar Questions

• A VI record with it's subvis and hierarchy

  Hello community,

  I'm working on two independent version of the same application. The differences are minor, most of the source code is the same. Obviously a pain in the back to keep as if I find a problem with esityksen and fix it then I need to apply the same changes on versionB as well. Even if I want to add a new feature. Its particularly painful if the hotfix affects several subVIs as so I need to copy the new version to the other version. Its very subject as if I just forget to crush a VI then VersionB can't do what I want it to do.

  The question I have: is there a way to export sort a VI with all its subvis in keeping the structure of moose files, so I can simply copy this new structure and it would replace all of the old screws?

  (Before ask you... I inherited this accession and there is absolutely no way to merge the two versions in a single application. "It must stay as it is.)

  Let me know if you have a feasible idea.

  Thank you!

  While it sounds like it would be better to find a new way to manage these slightly different versions, I will answer your original question.

  If all your screws are in a project, you can click on file > save for the previous Version... And then choose the version that you want to save it to. You can, of course, select the same version of LabVIEW in the menu drop-down (I don't mean that you need to change the version each record!). Choose a new folder to save on and it will preserve your file structure.

  It could be a bit annoying because it copies the entire hierarchy. So if you have a folder called MyProject with subfolders, but MyProject lies in Libraries\Documents\LabVIEW Projects\2014\MyProject, then you have to dig several records to join your screws

• reentrant VI copies the entire structure VI (of Subvi) when it is called?

  Hello world

  I would ask each of you about the reentrant VI.

  I have a VI (Thread.vi), which is set to reentrant (Preallocated clone reentrante execution) that is called from the main vi using the method run a VI. Reference of vi is open with all of the option 0 x 8.

  When I call the Thread.vi, the original vi clone is created.

  My question is, when the clone of the first level vi (Thread.vi) is created, all the Subvi contains the Thread.vi is also the Subvi originally clones?

  Going to queue named in the Thread.vi when it is called by using the control property value node and using this queue within the Thread.vi (in sub - VI) to control the Thread.vi.

  My problem is that when two clones are created, I can run, stop, and close the two together. But when I want to close the second clone, the Dequeue function reference to queue the first clone. I do not understand what the queue has been obtained with the name in the main vi and spent in the clone of Thread.vi. When I want to close the first clone, it works as it has reference to the appropriate queue.

  I thought that LabVIEW creates entire hierarchy of the Subvi the reentrant VI so when it is called.

  Thank you for your answers and help.

  Tukan

  I'm using LabVIEW 2014 32 b, Windows 7

  You use named queues, so unless you call your clones several times (rather than, say, calling a clone and get running code in a loop for a "long time"), I would recommend not worrying to pass a reference queue for the Clone, but rather the name of the queue.  Get the Clone of its own queue - if the hand is already done, get queue of the Clone will not allocate a new queue, but returns the reference to the queue already created.

  Screws that are used by the Clones can be "specific clone" (if they are, themselves, marked as Reentrant) or 'universal' and shared by all of the Clones.  There is really nothing wrong with that, as long as you realize that while A Clone uses void-VI X, Clone B will be "blocked" when it tries to use the Subvi, if you want to run in a mode of the Subvi '-and-out ", without blocking.  In particular, not to put any function, for example a Dequeue, who must wait in a common Subvi.

  Bob (who has learned this "rule" with the sad experience) Schor

• Question of hierarchy for the keyword Lightroom 3

  I use primairly LR3 to follow the architectural photographs with many different style or maintained by keyword type designations.  A hierarchy of keywords can be Tudor > (included under the Tudor) symmetrical > Gabled (included in Tudor).  Often, I'll print contact sheets that include key words displayed in the form of photo information.  On what seems to be a completely random basis print keywords may or may not include the entire hierarchy.

  If I check Gabled include in/under Tudor I can have printed on my board contact Gabled > Tudor or just Gables.  Never is it same rest forever.  Certain keywords, symmetrical say can print as symmetrical > Tudor and always will do.  I can redo the keyword (remove and replace), and it may or may not contain the hierarchy now.

  Random action must be something I am or don't do, but have you tried thousands of times to get a consistent result with no luck.  My library of architecture has more than 126 k photos.  I used LR since the first version beta and been able to resolve or understand recent questions (if Adobe or mine).  This question has me and there appear to be no questions and answers on the subject (probably few people rely on the ability to print a string of keyword).  And Yes, there are several workaround solutions, but not how I should approach.

  Anyone, please?

  LR will only show the hierarchy of keywords if the keyword exists more than once in your list of keywords. If you have one "Gabled" keyword in the list, you will see only "Gabled" in your photo info.

  Marc

• restrict the application of hierarchy based on a given value at the leaf node level

  Is it possible to restrict a query of the hierarchy based on a test given at the leaf node level?
  
  For example, in the data presented below, I like to shoot the entire hierarchy for terminal nodes that have 'John' in the criteria:
  
  Parent value criteria
  Z
  A Z
  B HAS
  C B John
  D B Smith
  E Z
  F E
  John F G
  H F Neal
  I have F John
  
  Filertering on John I want to return together to resemble the following prints:
  A
  B
  C
  F
  G
  I have
  
  I tried the following, but it only gives me the nodes:
  SELECT
  LPAD (' ', (LEVEL) * 3,'.) ') || t.Valeur
  OF tbl_test t
  WHERE t.criteria = "John".
  START WITH t.valeur = "Z".
  CONNECT BY PRIOR t.valeur = t.parent;
  
  Rule return form the above query:
  C
  G
  I have
  
  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  It is possible, but not conventional =)

  Sys_connect_by_path allows you to concatenate the path and another request of the hierarchy of dividing a value generated in the rows.

  with t as (
  select 'Z' as  Val , null as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'A' as  Val , 'Z' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'B' as  Val , 'A' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'C' as  Val , 'B' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'D' as  Val , 'B' as  Par, 'Smith' as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'E' as  Val , 'Z' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'F' as  Val , 'E' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'G' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'H' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'Neal' as  Criteria from dual union all
  select 'I' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual
  )
  select distinct regexp_substr(path, '[^,]+', 1, level) as val
  from (  SELECT  sys_connect_by_path(val,',') as path , rownum as row_id
            FROM   t
          WHERE t.criteria = 'John'
          START WITH t.val = 'Z'
          CONNECT BY t.par = PRIOR t.val
       )
  connect by nocycle regexp_substr(path, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null
  and prior row_id= row_id
  and prior dbms_random.value is not null
  

• Package VI and screw Sub

  Hi all

  I have a first level VI with a bazillion sub screws what is the best way to package all the screws in a nice, transportable set that will allow me to launch the first level on another computer that has installed LabVIEW VI.

  I tried to make a project out of everything, but it seems to me that the project contains pointers to the screws, not the screw themselves.  Is it possible to have the project include all associated files in VI?

  Or is it better to create a LAW degree?  If so, orientation in this way would be highly appreciated.

  Thanks in advance.

  If you go to your highest level VI and go to save one of the options is to save the entire hierarchy to a new location. This will save each VI which is called in your program. See below:

  

• A copy of the class LVOOP

  
  

  Use the file > save as on the class library itself. Click on "save a copy".

  If you need to duplicate the entire hierarchy, create a specification to Build for "Source Distribution".

• Why stage Builder creates constantly new instances of nodes?

  Hello

  I thought I had a simple idea to create a control that would allow me to recover a part of the behavior of a component of the map.  It's all of the control:

  import javafx.beans.property.BooleanProperty;
  import javafx.beans.property.SimpleBooleanProperty;
  import javafx.beans.value.ChangeListener;
  import javafx.beans.value.ObservableValue;
  import javafx.scene.Node;
  import javafx.scene.Parent;
  import javafx.scene.layout.StackPane;
  
  
  public class Card extends StackPane {
      private final BooleanProperty active = new SimpleBooleanProperty();
      public final BooleanProperty activeProperty() {return active;}
      public final boolean isActive() {return active.get();}
      public final void setActive(boolean active) {this.active.set(active);}
  
  
      {
          visibleProperty().bind(active);
          managedProperty().bind(active);
  
  
          active.addListener(new ChangeListener<Boolean>() {
              @Override
              public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Boolean> observable,
                                  Boolean old,
                                  Boolean active) {
                  System.out.println(toString() + " active changed to: " + active);
                  if(active) {
                      Parent parent = getParent();
                      if(parent != null) {
                          System.out.println("Parent is: " + parent.toString());
                          parent.getChildrenUnmodifiable().forEach(Card.this::deactivateIfCard);
                      }
                      else {
                          System.out.println("Parent is null.");
                      }
                  }
              }
          });
      }
  
  
      private void deactivateIfCard(Node node) {
          if(node != this && node instanceof Card) {
              Card card = (Card) node;
              card.setActive(false);
          }
      }
  }
  

  The idea is simple enough; expand StackPane, add an active property, bind the visible and managed component properties to the property active, and, whenever the active property is changed to true, browse the sibling nodes by disabling brothers and sisters who are also the type of card.

  However, this does not work with the generator from the scene.  While trying to debug, I created an ExtStackPane:

  import javafx.collections.ListChangeListener;
  import javafx.scene.Node;
  import javafx.scene.layout.StackPane;
  
  
  public class ExtStackPane extends StackPane {
      {
          getChildren().addListener((ListChangeListener<Node>) c -> {
              System.out.println("ExtStackPane children change: " + c.toString());
          });
      }
  }
  

  It doesn't save that list change events.  However, I was very surprised by the exit when you work in the generator from the scene.  I added both controls the generator onstage and did the following:

  0) added an ExtStackPane

  (1) added a map to the ExtStackPane

  2) added another card at the ExtStackPane

  (3) adds a label the first card

  (4) added a label to the second card

  5) changed the text of the first label Hello

  6) changed the text of the label of second in the world

  (7) set the first card to active

  (8) the value of the second card active

  I get the following result:

  1)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@5b9067b3] added at 0 }
  
  
  2)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@6b6328bd] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@6aca8cc5] added at 1 }
  
  
  3)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@3b7bc340] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@1879819e] added at 1 }
  
  
  4)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@60ffed67] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@64955a14] added at 1 }
  
  
  5)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@5dc96bc4] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@40667c26] added at 1 }
  
  
  6)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@164770fa] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@7decebbf] added at 1 }
  
  
  7)
  Card$1@f4f4850 active changed to: true
  Parent is null.
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@27442c8b] added at 0 }
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@643d810e] added at 1 }
  
  
  8)
  Card$1@4877c67b active changed to: true
  Parent is null.
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@7e8a473e] added at 0 }
  Card$1@2b4497c1 active changed to: true
  Parent is null.
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@5df6c8cc] added at 1 }
  

  This is what things look like in the generator from the scene:

  

  The scene generator recreate the entire hierarchy whenever I make a small change?  Here's an app that does the same thing as the manual steps that I performed in the stage Builder:

  import javafx.application.Application;
  import javafx.scene.Scene;
  import javafx.scene.control.Label;
  import javafx.stage.Stage;
  
  
  public class CardApplication extends Application {
      @Override
      public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {
          ExtStackPane stackPane = new ExtStackPane();
  
  
          // 1
          Card card1 = new Card();
          stackPane.getChildren().add(card1);
  
  
          // 2
          Card card2 = new Card();
          stackPane.getChildren().add(card2);
  
  
          // 3
          Label label1 = new Label();
          card1.getChildren().add(label1);
  
  
          // 4
          Label label2 = new Label();
          card2.getChildren().add(label2);
  
  
          // 5
          label1.setText("Hello");
  
  
          // 6
          label2.setText("World");
  
  
  
  
          primaryStage.setScene(new Scene(stackPane));
          primaryStage.setTitle("Card Application");
          primaryStage.setWidth(600);
          primaryStage.setHeight(400);
          primaryStage.show();
  
  
          // 7
          card1.setActive(true);
  
  
          // 8
          card2.setActive(true);
      }
  }
  

  The output when executing the above is:

  1)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@6dfaa767] added at 0 }
  
  
  2)
  ExtStackPane children change: { [Card@6aa2c411] added at 1 }
  
  
  7)
  Card$1@1abf7511 active changed to: true
  Parent is: ExtStackPane@41993867[styleClass=root]
  
  
  8)
  Card$1@5733cd2 active changed to: true
  Parent is: ExtStackPane@41993867[styleClass=root]
  Card$1@1abf7511 active changed to: false
  

  The behavior is obviously very different than when I work with control in the generator from the scene.  Can someone explain to me that event giving rise to the stage to change the behavior of my map control so much?  My map control breaks some I'm not aware of one or more rules?

  I think you're confused about what makes SceneBuilder.

  SceneBuilder is a design tool, used by the programmer (not the end user) to generate the part of the code that is used to run the application. (Specifically, it generates the FXML code which is analysed by the FXMLLoader to create and configure objects that are usually part of the graphic scene.)

  When you use SceneBuilder to create the code, it generates a model of what the user interface will look like, if the generated FXML should be loaded and displayed. This model is not meant to be an identical vision of what will be the end user, but a help to you, the programmer, to generate the code that you want to.

  So, for example your accordion/TitledPane in the layout of the poster than SceneBuilder, the * selected * titled pane is always expanded. This allows you to drag and drop objects inside and set it up in other ways. If you clear the checkbox "extended" in the properties pane, then it remains extended in the model so that you can continue to configure it. However, this property is not ignored: the State of these boxes is respected in the FXML file that is generated. So when you click on 'save' in SceneBuilder, the fxml generated will contain TitledPane extended element = "true" If the box is checked and expanded = "false" If the check box is cleared. (SceneBuilder will of course also applied the rule that only TitledPane in the accordion can be increased.)

  Similarly, for your control customized, you should be able to implement and SceneBuilder displays the 'active' property in the box. If you disable this property, if active = false, which will be respected in the fxml and when you run the active application will be set to false and so by your liaison, visible is set to false and the component is not displayed. But the comp in (of course) SceneBuilder always displays your component, because it would be extremely difficult for you to configure a component that did not appear in the programming tool.

  In fact, there is no real reason for SceneBuilder create all the objects that you set up at all. He could just trying to figure out what they look like and render a representation of them on a canvas, for example. It's probably much (much) harder than instantiating them and the authors of SceneBuilder apparently chose to write SceneBuilder in a way that re-instantiates the controls several times. But this has absolutely nothing to do with what happens when you run the application and it is no logic at all to compare the two.

• Own the library has blocked enforcement of the VI

  Hey,.
  I was just working on the LV - OOP fire workshop (find it here). Unfortunately, even if I'm on the right track with the real tasks, I can't have the example of programming oriented OBJECT to run. understanding is reflected by the ability to debug - I spent a lot of time looking at things and now I think that there must be an error in the Interface.lvclass. Reason is, that Section.lvclass works, while Configuration.lvclass does not work - Configuration includes Interface Interface itself is not running.

  The thread is only useful for this error message is on the LAVA Forums:

  1. one of your dynamic send VI is not the same connector pane (and data types) than its counterpart of parent.
  2. you have a dynamic send VI that is configured to require all children's classes to substitute it, and one of the children is not ignore it.
  3. you have a VI private with dynamic distribution on its part of the connector, which is forbidden entry.
  4. you have the VI to a dynamic redirection which is broken. Check the entire hierarchy up to the parentmost VI.

  Interface is inherited directly from LabVIEW. Therefore, I am excluding 1 and 2. I've not found anything by searching the 3, but that could well be due to inexperience. As for number 4, because of the hierarchy has nothing to check (?).

  I know it's okay to ask to look through all of this, but I can't find the problem on mine) -: I appreciate all help.

  I use LV 2013 on Windows XP 32-bit.

  

  
  

• LabVIEW 8.6.1 - message builder vi is password protected

  I am new to Labview 8.6.1 and I get a few messages I can't explain why. Labview is the construction of an executable, I have a few messages such as the one displayed in attachment. The messages are associated with the screws that are part of the Labview library and are protected by Word. Usually I ignore messages. I wonder why I see these messages.

  Another question: you can see the entire hierarchy of the project to generate an executable from just in Report Designer by exploring the table of parameters VI in Labview 7.1.1. Is it possible to see a similar thing in Labview 8.6? Or Labview 8.6 builds any project no meter if I put the generator in a certain way, with only a few screws of the whole project?

  Hi Virginia,...

  have you checked the field to change/remove the password?

  The manufacturer includes only the vi of always included and all dependencies of this as well as all dynamically vi with also all dependencies.

  Mike

• SubVIs called screw embedded in a DLL must be located at the opening of a VI that calls the DLL

  I have compiled a DLL that contains two exported screws calling subVIs that calls another DLL that contains hardware dongle functions.  The build DLL works fine and the two screws work fine as source code.  The reason why I want to build a DLL, it is avoid distributing the source dongle screws in order to make the two functions called more sure.  However, when I try to open a VI that makes a call to one of my two functions of the DLL (screws exported), LabVIEW try to find all the subVIs called by VI exported in the DLL.  This suggests that the DLL does not contain the subVIs - probably each VI called by the exported screws must be built in the DLL - or am I completely wrong?  I tried setting all the subVIs and the dongle DLL like 'always understood' and even export all the subVIs too.  The constructor of the DLL is able to include the entire hierarchy of VI in the DLL?  Am I missing a special combination of parameters?

  To summarize my approach:

  A first level VI (to provide an end user with password protected diagram) calls my DLL (two functions are exported screws) that call subVIs that call the DLL dongle.  I want only to provide my DLL and the dongle DLL, NOT all their source code is linked.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated, that this problem has ceased completely in my development.

  Mike

  After traveling through the builder application LAVA forum, I found a post that discusses a problem of construction of the Advanced setting 'Use LabVIEW 8.x file layout'.  This should be checked to make the build work.  Apparently R & D already know the problem (# 158487).  Moreover, previous projects of 8.6 will have this checked by default, which makes them to build properly.

  The new application now works correctly.

  The problem of generation original DLL is also fixed.

• Get links from speed negotiated CF using Cisco Powertool

  I can get the speed of the uplinks to network on the FI-s Cisco with the command

  Get-UcsFiLanCloud-Id "A" | Get-UcsUplinkPort - AdminState 'enabled ' | ForEach-Object {$_.adminspeed}

  However, there is no option to get the speed negotiated in the rising Fibre Channel on the Cisco FI - s. There is no property AdminSpeed of the output of the command below

  Get-UcsFiSanCloud-Id "A" | Get-UcsFcUplinkPort - AdminState "enabled."

  Is it possible to get the negotiated speed of the CF links? If so, please provide the command powertool.

  You can take a different approach to get them.  I said that the 'network element' cmdlet to get all the IFS, specify the 'Module' I want to get the information of (id 1 = fixed ports, code 2 = the first slot for expansion into the FI, id 3 = the second extension in the FI slot, if present), specify the FC port groups, get all of these ports and then use a select statement to filter down.  As you can see below, my FC ports are negotiated at 4gpbs.

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsNetworkElement | Get-UcsFiModule-Id 1 | Get-UcsPortGroup-CF to Transport | Get-UcsFiFcPort | Select dn, nmdt, admintransport, adminstate, operspeed | Format-Table

  DN Nmdt AdminTransport AdminState OperSpeed

  --                                      ----                                    --------------                          ----------                              ---------

  sys/switch-A/slot-1/switch-CF/port-31 fabric/san/A/phys-slot-1-port-31 Canadian forces active 4 Gbps

  CF sys/switch-A/slot-1/switch-CF/port-32 fabric/san/A/phys-slot-1-port-32 active 4 Gbps

  sys/switch-B/slot-1/switch-CF/port-31 fabric/san/B/phys-slot-1-port-31 Canadian forces active 4 Gbps

  CF sys/switch-B/slot-1/switch-CF/port-32 fabric/san/B/phys-slot-1-port-32 active 4 Gbps

  If you weren't aware, there is a large command called get-ucscmdletmeta.  It will help to understand how things are defined in the XML of the UCS model.

  Here are some example uses:

  Get-UcsCmdletMeta-name ucsnetworkelement-tree

  (I removed the output as it was very long, but it will give you the entire hierarchy of all classes of sup that are children of the network element, the names of XML classes for each and it suitable PowerShell verbs and names for query and manipulate classes.)

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-name ucsfifcport

  ClassId: FcPIo

  Name: UcsFiFcPort

  Verb: get

  PipelineClassId: PortGroup {}

  LimitScopePipelineClassId: {}

  MoMeta: Cisco.Ucs.UcsMoMeta

  -This result displays the available cmdlets to get information about an FC Port.  You can see the PipelineClassID PortGroup watch, which means the classes / substantive PoSh that are pipelineable in this category

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-noun ucsfifcport | Select mometa - ExpandProperty

  ClassId: FcPIo

  XmlTag: fcPIo

  RN: port-[PortId]

  MinVersion: 1.0 (1e)

  Access: input-output

  ChildClassId: {EventInst, FaultInst, EquipmentXcvr, FcErrStats...}

  AccessPrivilege: {read only}

  PropertyMeta: {AdminState, AdminTransport, ChassisId, Dn...}

  -Here, you can see the metadata Object (MO) on the Port CF class.  You can see it was added in UCSM 1.0 (1e) and needs only the 'Read only' privilege to see.

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-noun ucsfifcport | Select mometa - ExpandProperty | Select propertymeta - ExpandProperty | FT - AutoSize

  Name XmlAttribute Type MinVersion access restriction

  -----------                      ----           ------------   ----            ----------    ------

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction AdminState adminState System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction AdminTransport adminTransport System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction ChassisId chassisId System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  DN dn System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Encap encap System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Nmdt Nmdt System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction IfRole ifRole System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction IfType ifType System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Lc lc System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction LicGP licGP 1.4 (1i) of System.UInt64 ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction LicState licState System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction settings regional locale System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Mode mode System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Model Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction model System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction name Name System.String 1.0 (1e) ReadWrite

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction OperSpeed operSpeed System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction OperState operState System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerChassisId peerChassisId System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerDn peerDn System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerPortId peerPortId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerSlotId peerSlotId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PortId portId System.UInt32 1.0 (1e) Naming

  Revision revision 1.0 System.String Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Rn rn System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Series Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction series System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction SlotId slotId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction StateQual stateQual System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction status System.String 1.0 (1e) ReadWrite

  SwitchId switchId System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Transport Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Transport System.String [] 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Ts ts System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction of type System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction UnifiedPort unifiedPort System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction UsrLbl usrLbl System.String 1.4 (1i) is ReadWrite

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction seller seller System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Wwn wwn System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction XcvrType xcvrType System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  -In this example I show all the properties of the class Port FC.  As you can see that operspeed is the property, you are more concerned.

  Let me know if you have more questions!

  Thank you
  Eric

• Updated metadata to ASO

  Gurus,

  We have built a standalone ASO cube. We are finalizing the process of updating the metadata for the cube. The excerpts we receive DRM contain all of the hierarchy for each dimension, so we will not only make the changes, but update the entire hierarchy of the dimensions. This cube is complex and much shared members in 2 dimensions. What would be the best approach for the update of metadata?

  1. update the main cube OR by creating a cube temp and then by copying this sketch to the main cube.

  2. If we change the outline of maincube in each update of metadata, what would be the impact on the data in this cube?

  3. we'll certainly take backups via Maxl when he is executed, but do we need to import the exported data after each update of metadata?

  
  

  Please suggest.

  
  

  Thank you

  ~ RN
  

  1. I wouldn't do it this way. Update the plan itself (vs restructuring of the cube) is not usually a lot of time, so this does not really vs downtime rebuild the contour "in place".

  2. unless your version of Essbase is System 9, that I guess that's not, the cube will restructure well with 'delete not determined' in the State of charge (which is what you do if you want to rebuild the entire dimension) and keep the data. All existing data of level 0 will be fine, unless you actually remove members of level 0 in the DRM source hierarchy. In this case, the data for the deleted members will be lost (as you can probably guess).

  3 backups are always good. But there should be no need to re - import the data.

• end of migration of photo database

  Hello! tried to migrate my photos from the external hard drive 1st to 2nd. I did leave in Lightroom. It starts well. For some unknown reason, one of the HD was ejected (on its own) and the process is stopped in the middle.

  Destination HD has the entire hierarchy of folder with folders for each year, the months and the days of my photos, but some of my pictures are still on the HD (1).

  How can I 'consolidate' my photo database and complete the migration to the 2nd HD? Can I nead to "reconnect" each of my photos, or move them manually?

  Thank you!

  Greg

  Move photos to the appropriate help for your operating system folders.

  You will need to reconnect these photos in Lightroom, if so please follow these instructions: Adobe Lightroom - find folders and files moved or missing

• Bridge cache

  I have an SSHD, too small to accommodate the bridge Cache, as my C: drive. How can I run bridge to use another hard drive?

  I can get bridge (CC version) to create a different folder in the Preferences menu, but were unable to assign another hard drive.

  Yes, the desktop shortcut that did the trick. I should add that this 'correction' is, as said manual, very strange indeed. You run the bridge to this shortcut via preferences/Cache. However, after restart bridge, the location came under the shortcut to the real folder and, therefore, the entire hierarchy is listed. Weird.