Security server to slow Server Broker on the initial connection

Similar Questions

• Impossible to launch the store "we were not able to connect to the store.this could not have due server problem or the network connection has expired.

  Original title: PROBLEM WITH WINDOWS STORE

  Hi, I'm a first year student at IIT MADRAS. I just got a new laptop (W8, 4 GB RAM, 320 to drive HARD, I3). I had problems to open the store. He said: "we were not able to connect to the store.this could not have come because of problem with the server or the network connection timed out." My connection to the local network requires the proxy settings. PLEASE HELP ME.

  Hello

  Yes, the speed and connectivity of the internet must be consistent for the applications to work properly.

  I suggest you create a new user account and checkif the problem persists.

  Create a new user account.

  Setting up a new user account is a very easy process in Windows 8. There are two types of user accounts, a Microsoft user account and a Local user account. See this link for more information on the two types of user accounts and how to create them.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-8/create-user-account

  Try to connect with the user account that is having right of the administrator and check if the problem persists.

  I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please get back to us and we would be happy to help you.

• How can I change the initial connection speed in the State of the connection to the Local network?

  Default value is always 100.0 Mbps.  I need to account for 3-5 Mbps for the chart on the scale correctly in task mgr.

  Salvation of yesteryear,

  I suggest you have a look at the following link:

  Local area connection status does not show the correct speed

  I hope this helps.

• Problem with USB auto connect with clients that connect through the Security server...

  Lack of VMware View 5.0.1 with 2 servers connection and a security server. When the clients connect directly to the server connection, USB connection works very well... users can use their USB drives and other devices with their VM. The problem occurs when they attempt to use their USB devices when negotiated through the Security server.

  I know that port 32111 (TCP) must be open between the server security and the connection to the server, but even after doing so it does not always work... customers just to get the scrolling message of office in the USB menu initialization.

  Our current facility is:

  External IP address-> DMZ (Security Server)-> connect to server

  Entrust us our firewall config through our ISP (we are not overloaded with scientists here, it's just me, so things like little help my work load). They are certainly not incompetent (or at least were not in the past). I had to open the external 32111 IP port to the DMZ, then of the DMZ to our connection server that is used for external connections. Everything about VMware View works perfectly for the clients that connect this way, but not USB devices.

  One thing I give is if our having a configuration of VLAN dedicated for customers views influence what either. I'm trying to keep an eye on what ports are open that for our firewall for my records, but I do not see where I openly opened ports on the internal side of security server to our internal network. He must have the port opened directly from the internal face of security server of vmware 32111 discovers clients?

  The firewall Guys tell me that they checked over and over that port 32111 is open throughout the. They also said that they tried to telnet 32111 to our security server port and have nothing back (should have gotten garbage at least according to them).

  An idea of the next steps to take? It is obviously a blocked port, I just have no idea why at this stage.

  I know that port 32111 (TCP) must be open between the server security and the connection to the server, but even after doing it still does not work

  This is not what it takes. The agent is listening on the port 32111, you must open the firewall to allow connections to the Security server for the desktop on port 32111 (same thing you must allow RDP and PCoIP).

  Mike

• Not able to connect with the Security Server

  Hello

  IM setting up a demo with view 6 environment, and when I try to connect locally on the servers of connection it works fine, but when I try to connect to the Security server fails with the image below.

  

  The Security server has 2 network cards, now in the DMZ and in production. I guess I should also be able to connect directly to the ip production, but the same error.

  We have disabled the firewall between dmz and prod for troubleshooting, but same problem.

  The image below is the Security Server, the addresses here are the ip 'internet', I guess it's true?

  

  The image below is the connection to server 1, the addresses here are internal, and is the FULL domain name, if it was "internet ip" instead?

  

  If I try on the spot to connect to the ip address of prod on security with internet server explorer, im able to connect, but when I select the office that it will fail "cannot display this page", then shows the 'internet' ip in the address field.

  I guess there is just something simple I've missed... hope you understand my question

  Thanks for the support.

  If you do not already have a look at this description of the display configuration, it covers remote access via security servers as well. Setting up remote access with a view PCoIP 4.6 and newer https://communities.VMware.com/docs/doc-14974

  I guess the fact that you can connect through the servers of connection that the URL you configured in the view administrator for servers in connection is a production local IP address/address?

  External security URL server is also an IP/address of DMZ / external can be solved?

• View customer Horizon | Unable to login via the Security Server

  Hello people,

  We strive to deploy VMware View 5.3. Everything is complete we are able to access desktop of customer view through connection to the server. But when we try to connect to the desktop via security server, authentication of the user position get us the attached error.

  Can someone please help me to understand and resolve the error?

  Thank you!

  Hari.

  Thank you for your response. Issues was DNS resolution external URL referred to the client device. We decided. Thank you.

  Hari.

• SSL certificate for the Security Server external facing

  Dear all,

  Today, I bought an external SSL certificate of DigitCert for our security server. I imported the certificates in the personal certificate (computer account) on the Security Server store. DigiCert provided three certificates, root CA, CA server and the other with the name of our domain. I renamed the vdm to the friendly name of the existing self-signed certificate and used the friendly name for the certificate vdm has our domain name. Subsequently, I rebooted consulting on the Security server. They are all released on except the "Display Blast Secure Gateway" service which entered the suspended state.

  On our facility, we have a connection to the server and a security server. To the Security Server, we use a different domain name for connecting to the server. We have an internal PKI and the connection to the server uses an SSL certificate.

  connection to the server = server01.internaldomain.com

  Security Server = server02.externaldomain.com

  Why the certificate cannot be loaded to view Blast Secure Gateway? I missed something?

  Thank you

  Edy

  I solved it. It was with the private key of the certificate. This is the reason that the Blast Secure Gateway could not load.

• View the connections of the server to connect to the Security Server 5.2

  So, I wonder if it is anyway possible to not expose a subnet of office to the DMZ during the deployment of a security server?  I think remember me, there was a way to have the tunnel of security server all traffic through the connection to the server, but for the life of me, I can't seem to understand.

  Even in your previous PoC you should always have allowed some ports (PCoIP, RDP if use you it and the frame channel) from the server security for virtual offices. This has always been the case.

  The role of the Security Server is to protect exposure of desktop to the Internet. It provides a monitoring of protocols of the Internet (for example PCoIP) so make it succeed to check if the traffic is in the name of an authenticated user, and to ensure that if it is valid, it is transmitted over an office whose user is authorized to access. It is important to configure your internal firewall so that Office (PCoIP etc.) protocols can come only security servers. Then you give the required insurance. If such packets only packets UDP PCoIP arrive in your DMZ that are not on behalf of an authenticated user and then they are ignored in the DMZ without ever be passed in your data center. You know that all protocols for virtual desktops have been validated by the Security server.

  The Security server should also communicate with the login server and that's why you should also allow JMS, AJP13, and IPsec through. These should be only to the servers again only from servers to security and connection.

  You can always route the PCoIP packages through a proxy in your data center, but the security required inspection happens before that the Security Server so that eventually they can be thrown into the demilitarized zone.

  Mark

• Security Server cannot connect to the replica to connect to the server

  
  Hello

  I want to set up two security servers. Each connected to a login server.

  The installation of the Security Server works only when I connect to the backend connection.

  Telnet using port 4001 to replicas login server does not work. (from the Security Server)

  On the login replica server firewall rules seems to be OK.

  Who can help me here?

  Jan Willem

  It certainly works. Have two security servers, each associated with a connection to the server (for example a standard and the other a replica) is a very common scenario.

  Double check the rules in your firewall if you have an external firewall between your security servers and connection. Check for the setting procedure Administrator's guide matching password etc and for matching Security Server Troubleshooting section.  Make sure that the two security servers are configured the same (no group political advertising strategies of firewall different, firewalls running on all servers etc..). Make sure that the two connection servers are configured the same.

  Let us know what it was.

  Mark

• Security server certificates and naming

  Hello

  I create a security server to test some of the features of the Horizon. My question is about the certificates. I want to keep it as secure as possible. If I have the name of the Security server different from the external URL will this cause issues with certification? So my server would be say S132985SV1 and my external URL is access.amazingcompany.com. View would be ok with a different external certificate name (the name on the certificate would be the URL that would be different for the name of the physical server). Or will I have to the name of the Security Server similar to my external URL 'access.amazingcompany.com' for the certificate works properly?

  Thank you

  It is a very common configuration.

  The idea here is that the external name is the one with the certificate. This way the View Client can validate as being approved.

  In this case, you create a regular certificate issued for the external name and add short security server and the full DNS name for the same certificate San (Subject Alternative Name).

  In short, a common name for the external name certificate and adds the Security server to the SAN certificate fields.

  For more details, please see:

  https://pubs.VMware.com/horizon-view-60/topic/com.VMware.ICbase/PDF/horizon-view-60-scenarios-SSL-certificates.PDF

  See you soon,.

  JesusM

• Unable to connect to view Security Server 5.0

  Use vmware view client build horizon 2.1.0 1213173 (ubuntu 12.04 64-bit), when I tried to login (local network), I got timeout message

  I can connect if server connection hollow instead of security server connection

  one mistake that I find on security server is 33, SideBySide error

  no errors not found on the page of the web interface of the login server events

  Here is the output of scan nmap from client to server security

  from Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) 2013-11-06 15:13 MYT

  Scan nmap for view.cnc.net.my (10.1.1.20) report

  Host is (0.00017 s latency).

  Not shown: 988 closed ports

  SERVICE OF THE PORT STATE

  53/tcp open domain

  80/tcp open http

  135/tcp open msrpc

  139/tcp open netbios-ssn

  443/tcp open https

  445/tcp open microsoft-ds

  3389/tcp open ms-word-serv

  49152/tcp open unknown

  49153/tcp open unknown

  49154/tcp open unknown

  49155/tcp open unknown

  49167/tcp open unknown

  MAC address: 00:50:56:87:35:FF (VMware)

  Do not check everything again: you cannot log in because you can't solve. It can be solved, either replace the connection URL in the configuration of the IP address instead of FULL domain name, which I do not recommend since the certificate cannot be based on IP addresses...

  When you receive a message "Server (null)", it is because the server name cannot be resolved by the client. The reason why you configure server security <->Server with IP addresses tunnel connection is because they may not be able to resolve the FULL of the other domain name.

  The PCoIP gateway feature is enabled on the servers of your connection? It may be useful if you send us pictures of your configuration (security servers and connection)

• VMware View 5.1.1 Security Server LDAP errors

  Im having a serious amount of errors on my VMware View (5.1.1) security server

  Log debugging shows a large amount of LDAP errors, see below.

  2012-09 - 06T 10: 46:49.075 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0940) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 01:50.102 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0CB8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 16:50.109 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0FE8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 31:51.120 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0DD8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 46:51.132 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0244) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 01:52.159 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0F3C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 16:52.155 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0E5C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 31:53.182 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0F68) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 46:53.194 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-092 C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 13: 01:54.217 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-08E4) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 13: 16:54.227 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0504) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE

  Anyone got any suggestions?

  Hello

  The plugin ws_admin trying to make field checks every 15 minutes, but given that your security server is not on the field these checks fail. It is completely harmless, but they should not run in first place, I raised this in their own country.

  Mike

  Edit:

  There is a simple solution for this in 5.1.x:

  Under the current registry key HKLM\Software\VMware, Inc. \VMware VDM\plugins\wsnm\admin, create a new key named Params, and under that a new DWORD value named InitiateDomainChecks with 0 data. Once set, you will need to restart the VMware View Security Server service for the change to take effect.

• Peripheral NAT between Security Server and Connection Manager - View 4.6

  Hi all

  I'm trying to deploy a view environment 4.6 - with a view Security Server in the DMZ.

  The DMZ is a NAT entirely would be and isolated network (single firewall, configuration 3-leg-GB-2000 is the model of the firewall).

  
  At this point, just trying to get RDP to work with this configuration.

  The firewall configuration is as follows:

  -Security server IP - 10.1.1.49/24

  -The alias created to view connection server - 10.1.1.100 (NAT IP)

  -Tunnel NAT (with port 8009 and 4001) created between the server connection view and real IP 10.2.2.229 server connection alias

  -The alias created for the view Desktop - 10.1.1.101 (NAT IP)

  -Tunnel NAT (with port 3389) created between Desktop and view real IP Destop 10.2.2.239 view alias

  I can RDP directly since the Security server to the desktop (via the 'alias' 10.1.1.101 IP) view correctly.

  I can connect successfully from the internal network (via IP real office 10.2.2.239).

  When I try to connect via the server of security (from the outside) I get the connection for the initial connection manager, and I choose the pool to connect to. However I'm unable to start a desktop session. The error I get is "the office is currently not available.

  In the event logs on the Manager server connection that I see that the real IP (10.2.2.239) is used to connect to the desktop view - which will not work in this scenario (the 10.1.1.101 alias should be used).

  Has anyone deployed a server of security seen in this scenario?

  Thanks in advance!

  Not sure if it works or not, but there is a GPO that changes the rules to connect using the DNS name.  Is the name DNS returns the correct value, you must connect as?

• The upgrade of the view connection Server 4.6

  My view VM connection server currently running 4.5 and I wanted to upgrade to 4.6.  90% of my end-users have the agent 4.5 and 4.5 client.  I upgrade first before upgrading the server to connect to 4.6?  I want to have the 4.6 available for download to local users, but I'm afraid if I improve the connection to the server at 4.6 4.5 users won't be able to connect.  Everything I read of VM Ware, it should be possible.  I was wondering if someone had no problem doing this upgrade?

  Thank you!

  Ben

  Connection brokers, security server and perhaps the composer.  I don't remember if there is another version 4.6 on top of my head.

• View 4.6 and security server

  The Security Server and the connection must be in different local networks?

  I installed a DEMO, both for the same cause of LAN, there is no real DMZ there.

  Servers are 2008 r2 64-bit, I opened the 4172 ports and 443 to j.4 server,

  When clients connect to the connection to the server or the security gateway, they can connect to the virtual desktop, but trying to connect on the internet, there is a problem, the client can connect to the Security Server and enter the credentials, but trying to connect to the office virtual has a white screen and after a few seconds will appear an error message 'the connection to the remote computer has done '.

  Is this the same local network, which is the problem here? or something else that i'm missing?

  Another thing, the FW performed the NAT to the Security Server, in the fields of configuration to the Security Server, I put the public ip address.

  Thank you

  They can be on the same local network.

  You get the symptoms you see if you have not done all 3 installation steps correctly.

  Most people on this forum who suffer from what you see remedy through each of the 3 steps of Setup again very carefully.

  http://communities.VMware.com/docs/doc-14974

  Let us know who it was.

  Mark