see speed interfaces en MV

Similar Questions

• Working with USB high speed Interface Modul 2.7 in LabVIEW

  Hello

  is there an example works with a USB high speed Interface Modul 2.7 in LabVIEW?

  The EGG is a "Cypress CY7C68013A-56PVXC»

  Thank you

  Best regards, patrick

  Hi patrick,

  I searched on google for the module. The manufacturer is Braintechnology.
  If you need a LabVIEW driver ask them please, maybe it's that they can provide you with a.

  Braintechnology offers a DLL - USB. With a little work, you can include this dll in your LabVIEW project (call library function node).

  The following documents explain how to:

  Integration of external Code with the Shared Library Import Wizard (requires a corresponding header dll)
  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/tut/p/ID/2818

  Writing Win32 dynamic link (dll) libraries and qualifying of LabVIEW
  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/tut/p/ID/4877

  Example: Passing a variety of Data Types in the DLL for LabVIEW
  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/EPD/p/ID/1288

  Kind regards
  N. Ralf
  NIG.

• 1841, see dsl interface command

  Hi all

  I try to solve one of our site today and can't make the show command from the LAN interface on a router in 1841. could someone advise if the same command is used for SHDSL or my computer is running it with an IOS bug? Thanks in advance!

  #sh dsl?

  % Unrecognized command

  #sh worm

  Cisco IOS Software, 1841 (C1841-BROADBAND-M), Version 12.4 (15) T7, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)

  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Updated Thursday 13 August 08 15:42 by prod_rel_team

  #sh inv

  NAME: "chassis", DESCR: "1841 chassis.

  PID: CISCO1841, VID: V05, SN: FHK13212639

  NAME: ' WIC/HWIC 0', DESCR: "WAN Interface Card - ATM (with the multi line G.SHDSL module).

  PID: WIC-1SHDSL-V3, VID: V02, SN: FOC132041KD

  been a while since I touched these but from memory I think his show controller x/x dsl

• Nested 6 ESXi on workstation 11 - host can see 1 interface 'physical '.

  I'm trying to set up a nested ESXi 6.0.0 laboratory under 11 workstation.  The ESXi host sees only 1 custom NICs, one as vmnic0 which is operational and configured in the management interface.  I have three other network adapters configured for the virtual computer but ESXi is not clear make them they show as active and connected from the point of view of 11 s Workstation.  I need at least one more because it does not use the network for iSCSI vKernel management.  The cards, the first of which are configured the same (custom) in my computer.

  I dropped the hardware compatibility of 11.0 to NIC 10.0, but always without extra charge.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  

  

  

  

  If you have another suggestion I'm all ears.

  I'm pretty sure that it will solve the problem to add the missing lines already. Please make sure that change you the . VMX file with tab of the virtual machine closed in order to ensure that the configuration file is reread after the change.

  André

• IT BECOMES DIFFICULT TO SEE THE INTERFACE ON A HIGH REX SCREEN FONTS

  The applications that I am running on a Dell 27 "monitor all the text of the view menu which is a nuisance to read.  Change the screen resolution makes a blurry image - (and did the useless upgrade)

  I am told by the developers, that it is an OS problem.   How or when this problem can be solved?

  Visit system preferences > accessibility. There are many parameters it designed to improve the legibility and visibility. Try them all to know what they are doing, and then apply those that help you the most.

• Cannot see interface in mode of inspection inspection on CVS1458rt

  Nice day

  I did a VBAI (with a custom interface inspection) inspection. The inspection runs on a CVS-1458RT and control interface must be visible on a touchscreen connected via VGA to the CVS. But on the screen connected to the CVS is only part of the visible control interface, the last image of acuired. But the control interface also controls and counter part, which are not visible. Even if the VBAI inspection is defined as a start and no other computer is connected remotely to the CVS (without remote) I can't see the interface of any inspection. What I did wrong? If remote control my RESUME while it is inspectiong I can see the interface all inspection on my computer screen and can change the values of the elements of order entry.

  Thanks in advance

  This is the page where you can download Vision Builder AI 2015.

  http://search.NI.com/nisearch/app/main/p/AP/tech/lang/en/PG/1/SN/N8:2235, ssnavdl.

  Give it a try.

  Christophe

• Logic Pro does not recognize my audio interface

  Hi all

  I just bought the "Claret pre2 audio interface" (Thunderbolt) going to the thunderbolt port in my Mac pro. In system information, both devices show as connected. However in my audio preferences in 'pro Logic' his does not give me the option to select the audio interface, like its just do not appear at all. Someone has an idea of what might NOT be past - lack driver/s maybe? Thanks in advance

  Shane

  have you installed the driver and the control software, as shown below...

  https://global.Focusrite.com/downloads?product=Clarett+2Pre

  If you do not have - do, restart, make sure you see the interface in the audio and Midi of the Mac - if you do - then it will appear in the logic.

• Questions about Wi - Fi connection speeds

  I want to my wi - fi connection speed for my wireless devices. I use an Airport Extreme 4th gen, with an Apple Express 2nd generation. All devices are 802.11n, but iPhones have ac 802.11. I have an Apple TV and a Yamaha AV receiver as well using a Wi - fi connection and doing very well. My Internet speed to my iMac (cable) is constantly 88 MB/s. But two rooms, the living room, my devices see speeds Internet 12-15 Mbps. Two walls and 25 feet between the two.

  A new 6th gen AE would give me better speeds of Wi - fi? Alternatively, would be faster Internet? I pay for 75 Mbps. I realize to reposition my router AE could help, especially to move it to another room, but I like the speed of a wired connection to my iMac, which I use for work. If I got a new AE, I would probably opt for a time Capsure, but I think I read somewhere that he does not like working on 802.11n. My wife has a MacBook Air using the Apple Express... and she obviously would like to back up on a TC instead of his external hard drive attached to the MB.

  A new 6th gen AE would give me better speeds of Wi - fi?

  Yes and no.

  Yes, if you ask on the speed of connection Wi - Fi between devices on your ' LAN '. Given that iPhones are capable of 802.11ac, they would connect to faster speeds if they are in close proximity to the extreme AriPort.  Other 802.11n devices will connect to the same speed as they do now.

  No, if you ask if your connection Internet Wi - Fi speed will improve, since the speed of your Internet connection is controlled by your provider of Internet Service (ISP).  If you want faster Internet connection speeds, you need to talk to your ISP a faster Internet connection package.

  The trick to good Wi - Fi connection speeds in your network is to have Wi - Fi devices in the same room, or line-of-sight with the wireless router. On average, even a normal wall in a House will slow down the speed of 20 to 25%, so if the signal must pass through several obstacles, the speed of the signal drops dramatically.

  Sometimes, the only way to maintain good speeds is to add another AirPort router in another area where you need faster speeds and connect airports together using a wired Ethernet connection.  In the largest House, it is not uncommon to see four or five airports used to get good coverage throughout the House.

  My House is not big, about 2200 square feet, and it takes three airports to cover the good, fast throughout the House.

  I would probably opt for a time Capsure, but I think I read somewhere that he does not like working on 802.11n.

  As you know, a Capsule is an AirPort Extreme with a built-in hard drive. Otherwise, there is no difference between a Time Capsule 802.11ac and an AirPort Extreme 802.11 ac.

  I'm not aware of any report or other documentation that would indicate that the products do not like working on 802.11n. I have an AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule, and both do just fine with "ac" and "n" devices.

• HARD drive speed limited to 20 MB/s in T60.

  Hello!
  My problem is that my HDD (HITACHI HTS541680J9SA00 (80 GB)) has limited the speed to 20 MB/s.
  Screenshot of HD TUNE:
  

  

  S.M.A.R.T. is OK!

  I have the latest driver for the controller SATA of Intel ICH7-M (9.1.9.1004).

  Very important screenshot of Ubuntu LiveCD:

  Link to photo

  As you can see speed is normal for this drive, so there is something wrong in Windows (no BIOS)!

  Why is it limited?

  See you soon!

  Note of the moderator; image (s) for a total of > 50 K converted for the programming of the Forum rules

  This sentence is wise, but I fixed it in decrypting my HARD drive. Yes, TrueCrypt limited my hard drive... Now, transfers are normal for this HARD drive (average of 38 MB/s).

• Can not find the tourmalines usb gpib interface (agilent io suite) max

  Hello

  I try to use my USB-GPIB Interface of 63488 TAMS in LabView.

  There is a manual for the use of the TAMS Interfaces in LabView. You must uninstall all Suite of IO with the exception of the CLCL-pieces. The problem is, this option is not given in the new versions of the suite that run under win7 (14.2 +). And according to driver download site, you need to install Suite 14.2 +. It is misleading. On my request for a manual for the use of a newer version of the suite I don't got no answer so far, so I'll try on own and with your help, I hope.

  To do this, I have installed on my Win7 x 86 system:

  -LabView 2009

  NI-VISA 4.6

  OR-488. 2 2.73

  -Measurement & Automation Explorer 4.6.2

  -Agilent IO Suite 15.5

  -TAMS pilot 63488 v1.2

  The driver of the TAMS works on my system. The Agilent connection Expert I see the interface and the device connected. And I can connect through this connection.

  To use this interface in LabView, I activated the NI-VISA for Tulip passport, but I had no new device in MAX I tried to activate the Agilent GPIB cards for 488 programs in the Expert of the connection, but it was not the solution.

  So I checked the DLL. The GPIB - 32.dll is replaced by Agilent, so cards Agilent must be enabled for 488 programs. But the info for the t6348832.dll says "TULIP DLL for the USB/GPIB T63488". If the 488 option can take effect, but why I have no effect on the activation of the passport for a Tulip? Any ideas?

  Thank you for your help and support.

  Michael

  For someone who has this particular problem:

  I have found a small workaround to solve this problem. For this you need a Suite of Agilent, which will uninstall VISA without CLCL (review of Agilent IO libraries M.01.01 should be the last). With a tool like 7Zip, you can unzip the single installation file to get the installation files. Now you must enable the compatibility mode for Windows XP on the installation application before you install the libraries. After that, you can proceed as described by TAMS:

  http://tamsinc.com/HPIB/60488/support/NI-60488.htm

  Best regards

  Michael

• NO tab "speed up" on Intel RST MISTLETOE on U310

  Hello

  I'm not able to see "speed up" tab on my ideapad u310 Intel RST GUI. Is this usual somehting wrong with my system, or is?

  I'm not familiar with the u310

  but a search revealed that he uses the HM77 chipset, which supports RAID and so should be compatible with the function of acceleration to the RST.

  Now is the u310 using exclusive Lenovo RapidDrive, or implementing Intel caching software?

  I'm guessing that lenovo could turning off RAID in the bios. If the bios is not paralyzed, there may be a RAID option. If this isn't the case, then you need to find a bios hacked with displayed characteristics.

• Is it possible to change the source of e-mail alerts interface created by the ASA?

  Hello

  We have configured our ASA to send alerts by e-mail of events such as the connection, it works very well between our ASA and the mail server that is contacted through the 'inside' interface, however we tried to configure it to an another ASA on a remote site that is connected via a VPN from site to site , the problem is when the ASA remote attempts to send an email to our email server, it uses the source IP address of the external interface, we need to use the source IP address of the inside of the interface so that it is sent over the VPN. Is there a way to configure that?

  Now when the ASA attempts by e-mail to our mail server, it uses the source interface IP from outside because he see this interface, as the output of the interface accordingly of the email does not get sent over the VPN.

  Thank you

  If the remote mail server is available on the VPN site-to site, I don't think that you can configure the ASA for him come traffic one interface other than the one with a route to the remote server. And it will only encrypt in VPN tunnel packets that arrive on the interface where the card encryption is applied (i.e. inside of an interface).

  You could mail proxy or set up a redirection on your local mail server rule.

• Cisco aironet 1131AG AP radio interface down

  Hello
  I have a problem with my cisco aironet 1131ag AP radio interface.
  I configured the ssid, authentication and encryptation me have it (the ssid) associated with the radio interface, but the interface of dot11radio still in a State of remission to zero, and if a restart the interface this msg appears "% DOT11-4-NO_SSID: no SSID configured." Not started Dot11Radio0 ' what I need to do?
  Help, please

  Configuration:

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 1394 bytes
  !
  version 12.4
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  encryption password service
  !
  host ap name
  !
  Select the 5 secret $1$ Mf3YfBFQQS2.6MSWHQOeG0 $URAK
  !
  No aaa new-model
  domain IP Nida.local
  !
  !
  !
  dot11 ssid Nida
  VLAN 1
  open authentication
  authentication wpa key management
  Comments-mode
  WPA - psk ascii 7 01100F175804575D72
  admit-traffic
  !
  !
  diet pre-standard trading online
  !
  !
  username Cisco privilege 15 password 7 123A0C041104
  !
  Bridge IRB
  !
  !
  interface Dot11Radio0
  IP 192.168.1.80 255.255.255.0
  no ip route cache
  !
  algorithms for encryption tkip encryption mode
  !
  encryption vlan 1 tkip encryption mode
  !
  SSID Nida
  !
  root of station-role
  Bridge-Group 1
  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 1
  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  192.168.1.81 IP address 255.255.255.0
  no ip route cache
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  Bridge-Group 1
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface BVI1
  customer_id FastEthernet0 dhcp IP address
  no ip route cache
  !
  IP http server
  no ip http secure server
  IP http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
  1 channel ip bridge
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  line vty 0 4
  local connection
  !
  end

  You must create the dot11radio0.1 and fastethernet0.1 interface

  Must be something like this:

  version 12.4
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  encryption password service
  !
  host ap name
  !
  Select the 5 secret $1$ Mf3YfBFQQS2.6MSWHQOeG0 $URAK
  !
  No aaa new-model
  domain IP Nida.local
  !
  !
  !
  dot11 ssid Nida
  VLAN 1
  open authentication
  authentication wpa key management
  Comments-mode
  WPA - psk ascii 7 01100F175804575D72
  admit-traffic
  !
  !
  diet pre-standard trading online
  !
  !
  !
  Bridge IRB
  !
  !
  interface Dot11Radio0
  no ip route cache
  !
  algorithms for encryption tkip encryption mode
  !
  encryption vlan 1 tkip encryption mode
  !
  SSID Nida
  !
  root of station-role

  interface dot11radio0.1
  encapsulation dot1q 1 native
  Bridge-Group 1
  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 1
  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  no ip route cache
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
   
  interface Fastethernet0.1
  encapsulation dot1q 1 native
  192.168.1.81 IP address 255.255.255.0
  Bridge-Group 1
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface BVI1
  customer_id FastEthernet0 dhcp IP address
  no ip route cache
  !
  IP http server
  no ip http secure server
  IP http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
  1 channel ip bridge
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  line vty 0 4
  local connection
  !
  end

  PS has also removed the ip address dot11 interface slot and I'm not sure why the role of station is root?

• ASA 5510 using only the GB interfaces

  I am looking for should I use a 5510 to activate two interfaces for VPN connections broadband from only a few sites. Our 5505 s (I have dozens) can not manage speeds of more than 100 MB and I have now a few FIOS beyond that--150 to 300mpbs.  I want a 5510 basis who needs to manage a few voice / data sites and just use two interfaces. A basic 5510 allow 2 gigabytes or just ports FE interfaces?  I have to be able to use 2 GB interfaces and no one else. I don't know that the 5510 will probably support the same QOS settings that I use on the 5505 s... I just need more speed interface so that I'm not bottlenecking data (I know I could use several 5505 s and extend the charges but is not how I want to do it for other reasons). Thank you

  Hello

  To my knowledge the ASA5510 supports 2 x 1 Gbps interfaces when you the Security license for the SAA. The basic license counts 100Mbps interfaces.

  Take a look at this document for more information on licensing above

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/license/license82.html#wp190732

  Its a document from the 8.2 version but its still even to 9.x on the license requirement more security get the 2 x 1 Gbps interfaces

  The documentation for ASA5500 series promises an 300Mbps for the ASA5510 model flow, but I guess that's a value of location. In the most recent document, two values of max flow max and Multiprotocol are given.

  Here's a link to the document

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/prod_brochure0900aecd80285492.PDF

  -Jouni

• ACL IPSEC - CRYPTO vs Interface

  Hello

  Where an IOS device is connected to a PIX 6.3, with a VPN IPSec site to site with ipsec connection allowed sysopt

  Thinking that it would be simpler to apply the required ACL, I created the ACL crypto to the entire subnet with the thought I would create ACL interface for nailing to specific hosts inside the subnet.  I see now that I need to disable the connection of sysopt permit-ipsec for the ACL interface to apply.

  1. is it more common for crypto ACL to be more host specific vs specific subnet and the necessary ACL ONLY (with the active sysopt)? I have a true Swiss cheese of the armies on either side of the vpn that need access and I didn't want to maintain such a complicated in meaning OPPOSITE ACL.

  2 or it is more common for both - crypto ACL (allow a simpler ACL) then apply ACL interface?

  3. I see the issue with the realization of the interface & crypto ACL, there is more that can get sent THEN denied to the remote interface, or even blocked traffic on the local side.  If the ACL interface should be used, what is the best practice here?

  4. I see the interface that acl work when sysopt allowed ipsec connection is enabled, but only on outbound traffic. Is it because traffic has not struck the crypto ACL again?

  Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  Dan Foxley

  Dan

  Much depends on whether the VPN device also acts as a firewall. If this isn't ie. Once the traffic has been decrypted, it is then passed on the firewall then allowed sysopt of active ipsec connection is a logical choice.

  In response to your questions, speak from my personal experience-

  (1) crypto ACL tend to be more subnet than host-based, but it depends on your specific needs.

  (2) Yes, in general the crypto acl is more general, the acl interface is where you attach.

  (3) don't know, I followed. If you want to limit this subnet traffic is sent through the tunnel then you would with an acl interface but on a different interface IE. the interface more near the source of the traffic.

  (4) it is to do with the order of treatment IE. which is done first. Not really used an acl outgoing on the same interface as endpoint vpn but I suspect you're right.

  Note that you do not need to apply the acl on the actual interface the VPN ends, at least with the code v7.x and beyond. You can terminate the VPN on the external interface, and then use an outbound acl on the interface that is sent unencrypted traffic. Yes, that means he has to go through the firewall, but it can make the management of your ACLs easier.

  Jon