Sensitivity of compact display Z5

Z5 compact when typing get mutable letters or screen becomes no reagent

Problem solved with the update the update phone operating system has been a little slow to come in Australia. Phone works as it should do l don't love it no compact large Z5 complaints

Tags: Sony Phones

Similar Questions

LR4.0: Library meshes Compact displays a few numbers instead of file name, etc..

(Red) RAW files appear more their file name in library view meshes Compact (now just shows numbers)!
Jpg (green and blue) doesn't show anything at all, including the sides and the choice of status, and develops it disappeared.
This was after you import a catalog LR3.6 and its use intermittently for a month.
Data:
-Catalogue is beyond 1 GB in size, more than 50,000 images in the library
-Windows 7 x 64 with SP1
-LR4.0 x 64
I have not yet tried:
Re-import the backup of the LR3 catalog to see what is happening.
-Creating a new catalog LR4 and see if it displays the data in the display of mesh Compact
I tried:
Optimization/integrity tests the catalogue

Change the view - J/Ctrl or cmd/J.

Sensitive colouring text "display results that include all search words.

I use RoboHelp 2015 Version 12.02.384.
I created a provision of the screen responsive HTML5 Adobe provided Charcoal Grey -based layout and adjust the colors to match the image of my company.
The "use search option"is enabled and displays the text"show results that include all search words" on the tab "" Search " and the function bar." But the text is displayed in gray on the "Search" tab and is virtually unreadable.
How can I change the color of the "'show results that include all search words" string on the tab "Search"? "

Change the color of messages did not work so I've edited layout.css and changed the value of the color in the next section. That fixed it. Thanks for your help.

{label.wSearchAndLabelResults Body.Media - Office div.searchresults.search - sidebar}

Display: block;

margin-bottom: .75em;

padding-top: .75em;

padding-bottom: .75em;

padding-left: 1.75em;

Color: #000000;

}

Xperia Z3 compact MHL 3.0 1080 p streaming

Hello

On my current phone xperia z likes to broadcast content to my TV bravia w905.

This works well and should work with a compact z3 because this phone is MHL 3.0 better.

Recently, however, I discovered that the compact display of the z3 is only 720 p.

This phone will be able to stream 1080 p through the MHL?

IM also a little worried that MHL on a compact size phone can work less, especially when streaming.

Before you buy the compact Z3, I need to know how it behaves in mode MHL.

Ideas on this subject would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards

Gert-Jan fluff

I tested here, and if you play a 1080 p video using the video, it has not been reduced and enhanced again. You get 1080 p in MMC without any scaling. But if the content you are viewing in the phone is not 1080 p (for example General apps like the Chrome mirror), the output in MMC is enhanced 1080 p 720 p (the phone always outputs 1080 p but it is enhanced in this resolution).

change find rear bar

any way to get find it old bar back? I tried to watch: config and searching online, but couldn't find anything. I was hoping that you can personalize it the way other toolbars and I could remove the flexible space or move the controls.

Mozilla doesn't do usability testing? I doubt they make because there's no way on the new discovery is easier to use or upgrade the old one. I really don't want to install an add-on comes to make the bar research can be used again. It's almost as bad as when they removed the new tab option in the context menu of legs (something that chrome has). Thank you.

Why the new search bar is horrible.
- the keys next/previous occurrence of find are tiny and hard to click. To make them so small, because there are a lot of unused space, there is no reason.
- the next occurrence of the find has been moved far away from the text box. I almost always want to use the option of the next occurrence search first.
- Select all, match case and the X to close the search bar are completely the opposite. with ff magnified on a monitor screen is far the textbox control and the next/previous buttons.
just to remind you how much better the old bar was. everything on the top bar is better and easier to use.

http://S11.postimg.org/qsc5piwr7/ff_find.PNG

Here's a better code to move the spacer since its current position before the two buttons to a position after the two buttons to push the close button at the right end.

Add code to the file userChrome.css below default @namespace.
- http://KB.mozillazine.org/userChrome.CSS
The file userChrome.css (UI) customization and userContent.css (Web sites) are located in the chrome folder in the Firefox profile folder.
- http://KB.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration
```
@namespace url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul"); /* only needed once */

/* add text to Previous and Next buttons */
.findbar-find-previous label:after { content: "Previous"; }
.findbar-find-next label:after { content: "Next"; }

/* more possible tweaks */
/* Quick find - show buttons */
.findbar-container>*, .findbar-container>hbox>* { display:-moz-box; }

/* move spacer to a position behind the Match case button */
.findbar-container>spacer { -moz-box-ordinal-group:2 !important; }

/* close button at far left */
.findbar-closebutton { -moz-box-ordinal-group: 0 !important; }
/* older Firefox versions may need this code */
/* .findbar-container>.findbar-closebutton { -moz-box-ordinal-group: 0 !important; margin-right:10px!important} */

/* adjust the width of the text field */
.findbar-textbox { width:30em !important; }

/* add a background color to the checked Highlight and Case sensitive buttons */
.findbar-highlight[checked]>label { background-color:#ff8 !important; }
.findbar-case-sensitive[checked]>label { background-color:#f88 !important; }
.findbar-case-sensitive[checked]+label { display:none !important; } /* hide "(Case sensitive)" label */
```
(you can consider using 'Prev' instead of 'Previous' to give the two buttons of the same size)

Edition to update the code for the current releases.

write the bmp incompatible aid

In labview 2011, the help on the bmp 'writing' vi reference is different from what is shown in the dialog using the schema context of the block for the necessary data types. The reference to assistance to the first (2) elements of the cluster as U16 and U8, image type and image depth, respectively. However, context-sensitive help shows these two as I32 (I just plugged a wire cut at the entrance of 'image' on writing in the comics and on bmp icon context-sensitive help, which displays the data expected for this entry).

Which is correct?

The function is correct, the file of detailed help associated with this function does not.

Interestingly, the BMP reading help file shows the correct data types.

Good fishing! A person of OR will probably issue a CAR # to have corrected documentation.

UP2414Q, stuck at 30 Hz, HDMI double 1920 x 2160 tiles unspecified

Any version/revision of this monitor has an OHS meter that does not rely on daisy chaining for the operation of 4k60Hz DP? I was lucky to suffer A00 of Nov13 for over a year and is about to put it where it belongs - in the tip. The geniuses at Dell support offer to replace it with the same model where I told them don't not worry because even if he solved the curriculum vitae of sleep problems. Questions of support and compatibility 3D app is quite different from Pandora's box. My disappointment with the guarantee 5 years in option is that they refuse to replace the monitor with something else in the range and I am faced with a return/refund now. My other question from a marketing point of view is that he has been never announced to be detected as two 1920 x 2160 for 60 Hz operation screens and the resultant capacity of use which offered this limited mode. I am almost tempted to insert the history of my case here I have on email, but will not go there immediately.

The Land Down Under, the battle and crab @ 30 Hz continues

Each single 4 k/UHD monitor that I know at this moment there doing UHD 60 Hz by DP STD at this time. As far as I know, there were no UHD / 4 k 60 Hz scalers so everything had to be driven by the MST.

As far as I know, all revisions of UP2414Q are basically the same monitor and not with any new 1.3 HDMI 2.0 RFP Measurer or or anything so I'm sure it's STD for 60 Hz only.

From what I've seen on my Windows 7 + box GeoForce STD UHD 60 Hz seems to work pretty well. I also have the UP2414Q A00. And here I get the weird screen split thing or something else (60 Hz UHD is VERY sensitive to the display port cable, Accell cables better seem to work and if you must use an adapter or extension, you must be very careful because far most combinations will fail or be erratic at best), but 95% of the time just say things to try a different connector and then say things back to the good a set and it takes just a few seconds.

I ran all my games fine on it.
And it was beyond awesome to see/change photos or anything web or text.

Actually, the uP2414Q uses a method of current continuous of high-end to brighten and darken the backlight LED Go - r and does not use PWM at low prices, as do most of the monitors backlit LED.

Windows Vista seems a little longer at times and is a little more likely to throw himself into a weird state of monitor.

Projects of reactive nature is not recognized correctly on mobile phones and tablets.

I have problems with a sensitive project being displayed correctly on mobile and tablet devices. When I use Adobe Edge inspect the test on the mobile and tablets, it renders correctly in a vertical orientation, but not a horizontal orientation (direction of the unit). When I publish the project for devices, and then download the project on a web server to test in a browser, I get the same results for the Tablet and mobile phone doesn't recognize any mobile version. My problem is trying to get the device to recognize the mobile version in a sensitive project.
What I found:
On a Tablet (iPad 2 - iOS 8) I get the tablet of the presentation version when the unit is vertical and get a desktop morphing version when the device is horizontal. (These results were the same in Safari and Chrome browsers). When you test in Adobe Edge inspect the tablet version works as it is supposed to be the direction.
On the mobile device (iPhone iOS - 6 8) I get the version compressed when the device is in a vertical and horizontal orientation. It does not recognize the Mobile version of my responsive project at all (these results were the same in Safari and Chrome browsers). When you test in Adobe Edge inspect, the phone does not recognize the project in mobile version when it is vertical, but recognize the version of the tablet in a horizontal position.
I do not have access to other devices (i.e. Android) to see if the results are the same.
How I found this:
I created a new responsive project with only 1 slide and 1 button (the button is pause the presentation). In the view of the office, I created a "Desktop" title and hid in respect of other points of view. I did the same thing for the Tablet and mobile, with the titles 'Tablet' and 'Mobile' which are hidden in other views. I then published the draft for the devices and downloaded on a test server. Here is the link to test.
So my question is if someone else gets the same results that I am and if someone knows a solution. What I need the most is for mobile devices to recognize the correct version in a vertical orientation in a browser. I hope this isn't a problem with browser/phone and it is an easy fix.
Thank you!

Also with regard to your iPhone.

Your IPhone memory 6 is 375px width of display window, the default value of CP is 360. That's why your iPhone 6 enter the cause of the published file tablet mode detects your iPhone 6 width is greater than 360.

Open this site on your phone and confirm your width is 375: what is my Viewport size?

Then adjust (increase) your mobile breakpoints in captivate to the width of your phone. It should then enter the width of your phone.

Reasons of OC: very slow SweepSwitch?

I have a configured system as shown below. GC works well most of the time, i.e. YCs every 20-30 seconds max pause about 13-15 ms, OCs every 45-60 minutes with break about 10 to 30 ms max. KeepArea YC is 25% and GC trigger auto set to 23.4%.
However from time to time I get a long pause in the OC. Diagnosis of break shows that the problem is with the OC: SweepSwitch as indicated in the log below.
According to the docs (Introduction to managing memory - release R28), OC: SweepSwitch is "a short break from the halves. However, I have caught breaks of 5 seconds in the newspapers and other data that suggests that I had made a break as long as 10 seconds. In these cases, I didn't have enough diagnostics to show to some that it was OC: SweepSwitch I increased progressively diagnoses, but everything I have shows that the variation in time of break is always in OC: SweepSwitch and other aspects are still within a reasonable range.
I suspect that there may be also a very slow model OC: SweepSwitch only occurs on the first OC after the passage of genconpar to genconcon highlighted below.
Any thoughts on why OC: SweepSwitch sometimes slower would be highly appreciated.
Operating system: Linux 2.6.32 - 279.14.1.el6.x86_64
VM Version: Version of JRockit (R) Oracle R28.2.4-14-151097-1.6.0_33-20120618-1634-linux-x86_64
GC parameters: - Xms1g-Xmx1g - Xns: 400 m - Xgc: gencon
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Reason for the GC: GC trigger reached.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [OC #83] 282232.476: OC began.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Reason for compacting: Normal.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Compaction of 32 to 4096 parties to index 2752. Compaction type is external. Exceptional: No.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Compaction area start: 0xeb000000 end: 0xeb800000. Timeout: ms 333,333.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Compact display limit (by wire): 10200 (dynamic), using matrices.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Initial phase of the initial rating (OC1).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Phase semiRef weakjnihandles operate in single single-threaded mode.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Phase semiRef classconstraints operate in single single-threaded mode.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Original marking phase promoted 16503 objects (1088KB).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:09 2013] [CO #83] Initial phase of the competing brand (OC2).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Concurrent mark phase lasted 207,213 ms.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] From precleaning phase (OC3).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Precleaning phase lasted 16,991 ms.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Initial phase of the final rating (OC4).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Phase semiRef weakjnihandles operate in single single-threaded mode.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Phase semiRef classconstraints operate in single single-threaded mode.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Phase semiRef FinalMemleak operate in single single-threaded mode.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Final grading phase promoted 33496 objects (1972KB).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Withdrawal of 15 packages of ongoing work pool, now 277 packages.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Brand of total time: 262,350 ms.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] End of marking phase.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Change of KM strategy from: genconpar to: genconcon, right: back to the basic strategy.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] From concurrent sweeping phase.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Total scan time: 547,824 ms.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] End sweeping phase.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Ratio of medium-term compact (move the time of phase/total): 1.000000.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Compaction too short, increasing the ratio of compact.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Compaction, total time: 10,630 ms (ms 478,617 target).
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Compaction moved 19375 objects and left 2 objects. Total size 994752B moved.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Free memory 8257504B added compaction in 3 parts.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Found 26089 references.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] 22524 references updated.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] GC trigger is now 23.4%, was 23.4%.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [-] 816,920 ms OC (282232.476000 - 282233.293000)
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [con] 0.020 ms (282232.476000 - 282232.476000) CBS: PreGC
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [pau] 17,291 ms (282232.476000 - 282232.493000) OC: Initial
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [con] 223,511 ms (282232.494000 - 282232.717000) CBS: ConcurrentMark
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [pau] 33,006 ms (282232.718000 - 282232.751000) OC: hand
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [con] 4,586 ms (282232.751000 - 282232.755000) CBS: ConcurrentSweep1
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [pau] 524,649 ms (282232.756000 - 282233.281000) CBS: SweepSwitch
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [con] 5,071 ms (282233.281000 - 282233.286000) CBS: ConcurrentSweep2
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [pau] 0,278 ms (282233.287000 - 282233.287000) OC: Cleanup
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] [con] 6,117 ms (282233.287000 - 282233.293000) CBS: PostGC
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Page faults before OC: flaws page 3, after OC: 3, pages bunch: 262144.
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [CO #83] Size of the nursery after OC: 409600KB. (Free: 400339 KB parties: 10999)
[Thu Nov 14 02:22:10 2013] [OC #83] 282232.476-282233.293: OC 880239 KB-> 146686 KB (1048576 KB), 0,817 s, sum of 575,224 ms breaks, longer break ms 524,649.

If the solutions to avoid the resumption of the genconcon after a genconpar of emergency (and therefore the OC: slow SweepSwitch in this next genconcon) are:
1. -The value XXgcTrigger: value to a higher value to avoid ever getting genconpar. The value of this is of course conjecture based on the behavior observed worse cases.
2. Always use a genconpar, i.e. Xgc -: genconpar instead of-Xgc: gencon.
But the question remains, why the OC: slow SweepSwitch? Maybe something to do with the information we need for simultaneous scanning of reconstruction lost during the parallel scan?

Overrides styles apply to the new cloudy theme minus 4.1.1.
We need (on a single screen) to considerably compress a report view. To do this, reduce us the font size, get rid of padding, etc., resulting in a much more compact display of data. We do this by placing the following in the region report header (this is an IRR):
```
<style type="text/css">
table.apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA th {padding:0px 1px 0px 1px; margin:0px; font-size:12px; font-weight:bold; vertical-align: bottom;}
table.apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA th div {padding:0px 1px 0px 1px; margin:0px; font-size:12px; font-weight:bold;}
table.apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA td { padding:0px 1px 0px 1px; BORDER-LEFT: #ddd 1px solid; white-space: nowrap;  font-size:10px; }
table.apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA a { text-decoration: none; border-bottom:1px dashed; }
.look1 {padding:0px 1px 0px 1px;}
.look2 {padding:0px 1px 0px 1px;}
</style>
```
4.1.0 and 21 Scarlet theme, it does exactly what we want. However, under 4.1.1 with theme trouble a lot, but not all of these style settings are ignored. For example, the "nowrap" seems to take effect but, all others appear to be ignored. Looking for the source of the page generated under 4.1.1 I see the apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA of the class I don't know what the problem is.

It's actually a bigger deal that sounds like to the customer I'd appreciate any help.

Thank you

-Joe

Published by: Joe Upshaw on February 28, 2012 05:48
Joe Upshaw wrote:
Thank you, Paul.

Do you think I could replace them using «!» important; » ?

Why can't you simply change the selectors as shown above?

! important (without space) is the last resort and is not necessary in this case as matching the theme later in the cascade selectors will be replace the rules of theme.

As I said, we want only that this behavior on a single window, and it seems just exaggerated. If there is no way to do it, you know a detailed anywhere doc to allow me to add a template just for that?

Interactive reports using templates, if working around or on top existing styles is the only way to change their appearance.

Truncate the text after the first line in TextFlow

I have a TextFlow object that is rendered in a Sprite with several lines.
For a compact display, I now want to show only the first line, followed by 3 dots (...).
I've not found a good approach up to now.

There is a support for truncation. It is limited to cases of use of label and requires the use of the TextLine factories. There is no support for text editable with truncation. Example below.

Hope that helps,

Richard

/** ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Copyright 2011 Adobe Systems Incorporated All Rights Reserved.
NOTICE: Adobe permits you to use, modify, and distribute this file in accordance with the terms of the Adobe license agreement accompanying it. If you have received this file from a source other than Adobe, then your use, modification, or distribution of it requires the prior written permission of Adobe. */ package { import flash.display.DisplayObject; import flash.display.Sprite; import flash.display.StageAlign; import flash.display.StageScaleMode; import flash.geom.Rectangle; import flash.text.StyleSheet; import flash.utils.ByteArray; import flashx.textLayout.container.ContainerController; import flashx.textLayout.conversion.TextConverter; import flashx.textLayout.elements.TextFlow; import flashx.textLayout.formats.TextLayoutFormat; import flashx.textLayout.factory.StringTextLineFactory; import flashx.textLayout.factory.TextFlowTextLineFactory; import flashx.textLayout.factory.TruncationOptions; [SWF(width="500", height="500")] public class Truncation extends Sprite { public function Truncation() { stage.align = StageAlign.TOP_LEFT; stage.scaleMode = StageScaleMode.NO_SCALE; // sample of truncation with the StringFactory var stringFactory:StringTextLineFactory = new StringTextLineFactory(); var stringSprite:Sprite = new Sprite(); stringSprite.x = 25; stringSprite.y = 25; addChild(stringSprite); // this bounds has no maximum height stringFactory.compositionBounds = new Rectangle(0,0,200,NaN); stringFactory.text = "This is an extremely long and overly verbose string of text that I would like to see trunctated."; // truncate after two lines stringFactory.truncationOptions = new TruncationOptions(TruncationOptions.HORIZONTAL_ELLIPSIS,2); stringFactory.createTextLines(function (obj:DisplayObject):void { stringSprite.addChild(obj); }); // sample of truncation with the TextFlowTextLineFactory var flowFactory:TextFlowTextLineFactory = new TextFlowTextLineFactory(); var flowSprite:Sprite = new Sprite(); flowSprite.x = 25; flowSprite.y = 75; addChild(flowSprite); // this bounds has no maximum height flowFactory.compositionBounds = new Rectangle(0,0,200,NaN); // truncate after three lines with a big red ellipsis flowFactory.truncationOptions = new TruncationOptions(TruncationOptions.HORIZONTAL_ELLIPSIS,3,TextLayoutFormat.createTextLayoutFormat({ fontSize:24, lineHeight:0, color:0xff0000 })); flowFactory.createTextLines(function (obj:DisplayObject):void { flowSprite.addChild(obj); },TextConverter.importToFlow(Data.markup, TextConverter.TEXT_LAYOUT_FORMAT)); } } } class Data { public static const markup:String = "" + " The following excerpt is from Ethan Brand by Nathaniel Hawthorne. " + "There are many such lime-kilns in that tract of country, for the purpose of burning the white marble which composes" + " a large part of the substance of the hills. Some of them, built years ago, and long deserted, with weeds growing in the vacant round of the interior, which is open to the sky," + " and grass and wild-flowers rooting themselves into the chinks of the stones, look already like relics of antiquity, and may yet be overspread with the lichens of centuries to come." + " Others, where the lime-burner still feeds his daily and nightlong fire, afford points of interest to the wanderer among the hills, who seats himself on a log of wood or a fragment " + "of marble, to hold a chat with the solitary man. It is a lonesome, and, when the character is inclined to thought, may be an intensely thoughtful occupation; as it proved in the case " + "of Ethan Brand, who had mused to such strange purpose, in days gone by, while the fire in this very kiln was burning. The man who now watched the fire was of a " + "different order, and troubled himself with no thoughts save the very few that were requisite to his business. At frequent intervals, he flung back the clashing weight of the iron door, " + "and, turning his face from the insufferable glare, thrust in huge logs of oak, or stirred the immense brands with a long pole. Within the furnace were seen the curling and riotous flames, " + "and the burning marble, almost molten with the intensity of heat; while without, the reflection of the fire quivered on the dark intricacy of the surrounding forest, and showed in the " + "foreground a bright and ruddy little picture of the hut, the spring beside its door, the athletic and coal-begrimed figure of the lime-burner, and the half-frightened child, shrinking " + "into the protection of his father's shadow. And when again the iron door was closed, then reappeared the tender light of the half-full moon, which vainly strove to trace out the " + "indistinct shapes of the neighboring mountains; and, in the upper sky, there was a flitting congregation of clouds, still faintly tinged with the rosy sunset, though thus far down " + "into the valley the sunshine had vanished long and long ago. "; }

After the update to 34.0.5 Firefox, good number of our sensitive sites of companies we created are displayed incorrectly, that in Firefox.

Now that I have updated, or rather has been automatically updated to the new version of Firefox, many Web sites that have been good before, now appear correctly only on Firefox. I enclose a link to display the different browsers and what they currently show. I use an iMac OS X Yosemite running.

I tried a full cleaning of the Firefox and all the files, extensions and bookmarks, with a new facility. Images that I will have in the link enclosed will be the version of Firefox slate. I need to know, not only what is causing this issue, but how to solve it. Currently, I have to go into each of our sites and check to see if they are affected. If they are, then I must make a new .css file customized for this specific version of Firefox and hope that this issue is not fixed at a later date and I have to go back to each of them.

To the best of my knowledge, the new Firefox has some problem to show images to their size, they should not be, or not to read the CSS correctly. It is originally the rest of the layout of the site to be moved and messed up. I have associated images to be larger that how they display certain screen sizes so that when they are narrowing down to one layout mobile, for example, the image fills the screen. Bypassing of all different sizes of a sensitive provision separate image files, which is not practical, there's no way I can solve the problem.

For example, I use a flex of gantry container, with 3 modules together on a Joomla platform for a single site. The '%' for the 3 containers from left to right is as follows: 25%, 50%, 25%. They work fine in all other browsers and has worked well in the old version of Firefox, and now they are causing big problems. I actually had to make the total container adds up to less than 100% to show somewhat properly. Of course, there is a problem, but right now, it's the simplest solution I found trying to repair files for this new update.

Here is a link to the image I did the list of comparisons side by side of what is currently happening on our sites. Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated, as other customers have called already saying that their sites are not displayed correctly. And surprise, surprise, it is only in the new version of Firefox. http://www.clearchoicestudio.com/Firefox-issues/browser-difference.jpg

I have fixed the problem. It was a necessary update of Portico to solve the problem. It took them time to get things fixed to work with the new Firefox update.

Z3 HDCP Compact error with Microsoft display adapter (Mirrorcast)

Recently I bought a Z3 Compact and the Microsoft Wireless display adapter (uses Mirrorcast). When I use the mirroring of the screen on the Z3 there however, the Microsoft display adapter when you connect I get the error: "could not turn on the screen of mirroring. The output device is not ready or does not support HDCP ".

I tested the display adapter MS with a PC Windows 8.1 and can properly connect and share my screen, so I don't know that the adapter is working properly. I tried the adapter on my Bravia and another brand of TV, it works with Windows 8.1 devices but not my Xperia.

Sorry to hear that you have problems with mirroring of the screen.

Our developers have investigated this and found that the problem is that Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter is not completely compatible with the HDCP 2.2 specification.

However, our engineers brought a work around for this problem so that it will still work. This work around will be conducted with the update for Android 5 for Z2 and Z3.

Exhibiting in context sensitive help display bug

Hello

I found a bug, but just didn't know where to report so I'm posting it here. (What is the suitable channel for bug reports)?

When I wriggle-over "before software final Position" on the property of an axis node SoftMotion, context-sensitive help contain this line:

Valid values are between 0 and 253. The default value is 230.

I was puzzled, because I use (successfully) values well beyond this range. In any case, I detailed assistance from opening and saw:

Valid values are between 0 and 2⁵³. The default value is 2³⁰.

It's a very big difference! Is it simply a typo, or a result of formatting stripped using the context?

Hi JKSH,

I presented the CAR #390204 to our R & D group for the survey.

In addition, here a link to a page describing the process of bug reports.

Cannot use a CSS file to display from the rafters in the sensitive HTML output

We use a CSS file to add styles to characters in some of our content. It works by using the WebHelp output, but when we exit to HTML5 reactive, rafters are not displayed. Here is the code in the CSS file:
span. KeyName {}
make-weight: normal;
do-variant: small-caps;
}
span. KeyName: before {}
content: ' < ';
}
span. KeyName: after {}
content: ' > ';
}
This part of the CSS file should just define content relevant to small capitals and wrapping brackets around it. When you look at this style in the Styles dialog box, it does not display the rafters in the preview window, then perhaps there is a clue as to what is at the origin of the problem. We use RoboHelp version 11, but get the same problem with the 2015 version. Any advice would be appreciated.

I'm not a CSS guru, but I know that the output files are different from the source. My gut tells me that the build process is originally munging of the CSS in the output. I tested by copying your code and pasting in one of my CSS and applying the style. As you say, WebHelp was beautiful and the media were there but more responsive, they were absent. But when I copied the CSS from the source to the output, the reactivity is actually media.

When I compared the differences, what seems to happen is that in the CSS source there are quotes that surround the characters of your choice and in the output, the quotes are ejected. So workaround seems to be either simply change the CSS output after generating or just copy the CSS source produce by and replace with her output.

:

See you soon... Rick

Sensitivity of compact display Z5

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for