SHA1

Similar Questions

• Firefox publishes a MD5 or SHA1 hash for me to check my download?

  For security reasons, I want to be able to check my download of Firefox using the MD5 or SHA1 hash.

  Firefox 3.6.13 you can access it here - http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.6.13/

• Export of SHA1 LDAP in AD

  Hello

  We currently have a WIndows 2008 AD Setup and also several Linux servers, which we have a LDAP Linux server.

  What I want to do is to replace the LDAP Linux server with Windows 2008 AD Setup and authenticate users with AD LDAP.

  I can export the users LDAP Inc., their SHA1 passwords and I was wondering if there is anyway that I can import these in AD?

  If I can't directly import the SHA1 in AD, are there other options?

  Thank you

  Stuart

  Hello

  I suggest you post the same question in the Microsoft Technet forum. We have a dedicated team to help you with Windows 2008 server problems.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

• RIM-COD-SHA1 value to the jad file will not be checked during the on air download

  Hi, expert,

  I'm trying to see if the 2 following properties espeically the sha1 either activated or not during the over-the-air download of my aplication:

  RIM-COD-SHA1: 8 b 11 58 and 6 d 94 ee 4 c 94 27 09 57 95 1 b 1 c 80 2 b 45 38 f8 f7
  RIM-COD-size: 68020

  So I modified the value of sha1 of my jad file, to my surprise, actually the download will not check it at all and download was successful.  Actually the RIM-COD-size value is not matching the actual size of the cod file so. I suppose it could be due to some extra bytes added by signing. It is perhaps because of the same reason do not check the sha1 as well.

  But with all this, how BONES would be able to check the consistency between the JAD file and cod in case a COD file is corrupted? From my reading on the web, the sha1 is checked which is different from what I've seen during my obvious tests.

  Moreover, for on the airflow, after the signing, in fact we still use a single COD file that is in the results expected/standard eclipse folder (there is also one of expected/web results, but we don't use it) and then we rename the file .zip and extra cod all these cod file the zip and put all these cod and jad file on our server.

  I'm doing sth wrong here?

  Signatures added at the end of a COD file are not included when calculating the value of SHA1.  It is expected that the SHA1 of the JAD file values remain the same after the signing.

• Problem of HMAC-SHA1!

  I do not understand this problem! I am really frustrated...

  I have this por HMAC-SHA1 function:

  QByteArray Fla * bleep *: firmaHMACSHA1 (QString textBase, QString key) {}
  qDebug()< "base:="" "="" +="">
  qDebug()< "key:="" "="" +="">
  sb_Context hmacContext;
  sb_GlobalCtx globalCtx;
  unsigned char messageDigestHMAC [SB_HMAC_SHA1_160_TAG_LEN];

  hu_GlobalCtxCreateDefault(&globalCtx);
  hu_RegisterSbg56 (globalCtx);
  hu_RegisterSystemSeed (globalCtx);
  hu_InitSbg56 (globalCtx);

  QByteArray textBaseBytes = textBase.toUtf8 ();
  unsigned char * textBaseHash = reinterpret_cast(textBaseBytes.data ());
  QByteArray keyBytes = key.toUtf8 ();
  unsigned char * keyHash = reinterpret_cast(keyBytes.data ());

  hu_HMACSHA1Begin (SB_HMAC_SHA1_160_TAG_LEN, keyHash, NULL, & hmacContext, globalCtx);
  hu_HMACSHA1Hash (hmacContext, (size_t) textBaseBytes.length (), textBaseHash, globalCtx);
  hu_HMACSHA1End (& hmacContext, SB_HMAC_SHA1_160_TAG_LEN, messageDigestHMAC, globalCtx);

  QByteArray PasswordHash = QByteArray::fromRawData (reinterpret_cast(messageDigestHMAC), SB_HMAC_SHA1_160_TAG_LEN);

  hu_GlobalCtxDestroy(&globalCtx);
  qDebug()<>
  Return passwordHash.toBase64 () .toPercentEncoding ();
  }

  For these values, works WELL:

  textBase: POST&https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fservices%2Foauth%2Frequest_token&oauth_callback%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.poncholabs.net%26oauth_consumer_key%ca93486d3aa617636656d7XXXXXXXXXX%26oauth_nonce%3D87ae6fb631f7c8a627e8e28785d9992d%26oauth_signature_method%3DHMAC-SHA1%26oauth_timestamp%3D1402195208%26oauth_version%3D1.0

  key: f0e54c70825XXXXX &

  But for these values does not work:

  textBase: POST&https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fservices%2Foauth%2Faccess_token&oauth_consumer_key%3Dca93486d3aa617636656d7XXXXXXXXXX%26oauth_nonce%3D936a40b7e8eea0dc537e5f2edee1387a%26oauth_signature_method%3DHMAC-SHA1%26oauth_timestamp%3D1402195228%26oauth_token%3D72157644652600637-4d9daa97cdab0be3%26oauth_verifier%3D7ee06a20ebc9d621%26oauth_version%3D1.0

  key: f0e54c70825XXXXX & dcec3a2abb77844b

  Why not work well? To compare the hash generated with the result https://quickhash.com, are NOT the same (for the first values placed if I coincide).

  You can see that between the values I put, what changes is basically the key

  NOTE: For obvious reasons, that I have NOT set the secret values of the API complete, I replaced some characters by 'X '.

  Help, please.

  FIX:

  Change hu_HMACSHA1Begin (SB_HMAC_SHA1_160_TAG_LEN, keyHash, NULL, & hmacContext, globalCtx);

  By: hu_HMACSHA1Begin ((size_t) keyBytes.length (), keyHash, NULL, & hmacContext, globalCtx);

  Is the right one.

• HMAC-SHA1

  Hello

  I have a small question.

  My application needs to communicate with a web service that uses code HMAC-SHA1. Is there an API that would calculate HMAC-SHA1 signatures for me?

  Thank you

  Go to the API documentation and click on "net.rim.device.api.crypto", go down until you get to tutorials and choose #10. Summaries and MACs. They demonstrate the HMAC-SHA1 encoding.

• Where to find the correct SHA1 checksum for the upgrade Pro Windows 8 ISO?

  I ordered the Windows 8 Pro upgrade online.  (not a preview but the new product on 26/10/12).  I downloaded and burned the ISO of the English version of the Windows 8 ISO file.  I'm assuming that 64-bit. This took place without incident.  I started the upgrade on a PC running Windows 7 SP1 64-bit, but it failed during the installation phase of Windows 8 to 72% with the error "installing Windows 8 failed".

  So I restarted the upgrade and it has not exactly in the same place (72%) and the same cryptic error.
  So I contacted the Microsoft Store and they helped me to go through the process of downloading a 2nd time.  The 2nd ISO file was exactly the same size, BUT it had a different SHA1 checksum!
  Then I tried the upgrade using the new DVD burned in the 2nd ISO file and it failed at exactly at the same stage of the upgrade (72%).
  So I got two corrupt downloads / Burns?   I have no way to tell because all I know is that they have different amounts of control.
  Maybe they all are both wrong, or maybe the question is something else entirely.
  But first things first.   How can I determine if my ISO file is correct?
  What is the checksum SHA1 of a non-corrupt ISO file?    Where to find the information online?

  I have the same problem with my 64-bit windows English version.

  I created a bootable DVD from iso and started to install a clean install by formatting the hard drive.
  Installation will be stuck at 17% and it happened to me like 3 times and I burned a fresh DVD and always the same question.
  It's like the worst level ever... Is there a way I can download an iso of 64-bit bootable DVD and use it to upgrade?

• Oracle 11g SHA1 SHA2 Oracle 12 c authorized Net

  I am looking for the following:
  
  Description of the system: the current system is an Oracle DB using 11 g w / Oracle Forms. They use to enter orders and process transactions from credit card with Authorized.net
  Description of the problem: since may 2015 Authorized.net is no longer supported SHA1 authentication. They do support the SHA2 authentication now. They need support to convert and change SHA1 SHA2 authentication and get authorized.net to work.
  
  See authorized.net websites that document this change/problem:
  https://community.developer.authorize.NET/T5/the-authorize-NET-developer-blog/authorize-NET-begins-infrastructure-and-Sha-2-certificate/BA-p/49615
  https://community.developer.authorize.NET/T5/the-authorize-NET-developer-blog/production-certificate-upgrades-begin-May-27-2015/BA-p/50430
  
  Research: We have troubleshooted the problem and tried to fix on our end. After review, we found that Oracle 11 g does not support the SHA2 and must be upgraded to 12.x
  
  I would like to have this problem temporarily for now and then do additional tests / development with Oracle 12.x. unable to solve the problem at the moment, he customer would be a complete solution to make it work with oracle 12.x
  

  Hello

  What version of Oracle are you using?

  SHA - 2 is supported in the 11.2.0.3 output: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e41360/chapter1_11203.htm#NEWFT355

• VMA new v6 Server Error (s) runs a command ESXCLI: connection failed. Digital fingerprint SHA1 of the server (not approved)

  New Server v6 of vMA. Added two new ESXi hosts v6 at the VMAs with no problems. When I change the target to one of these new hosts and try to run "esxcli system syslog recharge", I get the error: failed to connect . (Untrusted) Server SHA1 thumbprint [thumb print listed here] .

  Research tells me what to do if I get this error running and order ESXCLI on my PC, but nothing when it arrives at the VMAs.

  Any help is appreciated people - thank you!

  Me am I say - READ THE MANUAL/RELEASE NOTES

  vMA 6.0 Release Notes

  • ESXCLI command displays SSH fingerprint error

    When you run a command ESXCLI in each target ESX, footprint SSH error appears. Add the footprint against each target ESX using the credstore_admin.pl utility. Run the following command:

    /usr/lib/VMware-VCLI/apps/General/credstore_admin.pl add s ServerName> imprintt >

    where: servername is the name of target ESX and Thumbprint is the value that is received in error during the execution of the command esxcli .

    For example:

    VI-admin@sin2-Pek-esxplatdhcp156 :/> Add sin2-pek - esxplatdhcp211.eng.vmware.com - s /usr/lib/vmware-vcli/apps/general/credstore_admin.pl t E2:FA:96:09:FC:18:C8:19:07:3F:78:12:74:46:66:1E:C8:3 B: 84:8 C

    VI-admin@sin2-Pek-esxplatdhcp156 :/> /usr/lib/vmware-vcli/apps/general/credstore_admin.pl add s 10.111.8.211 t E2:FA:96:09:FC:18:C8:19:07:3F:78:12:74:46:66:1E:C8:3 B: 84:8 C

    This problem has been resolved in this release.

  All better.

• Imprint of SSL (SHA1) in ESX I copy on my worksheet

  How do I copy information digital footprint SSL (SHA1) of the console of the ILO in my spreadsheet.

  Too many ESX hosts I exist in my environment wehre I work and now I wonder to a worksheet with the thumbprint info SSL of ESX host them all.

  for each host, I have to open the console of the ILO and take note of all those who, like manually

  D 03:0: 86:8E:3 A: 49:FC:33:EF:41:07:CD:5 C: C3:28:D7:95:3F:11:D0

  It's really consuing time and I'm sure wehther I am in the correct values in the worksheet.

  Y at - it that somehow it please let me know.  Thanks in advance.

  Discover the lamw healthcheck script.  It will make has many elements, including the digital fingerprint of the ssl host.

  http://communities.VMware.com/docs/doc-9842

  -KjB

• SHA1 for Flash cs5?

  Hello

  I have updated with the latest core lib for sha1, but I get the following error when compiling in CS5 for an AIR application:

  com\adobe\crypto\SHA1. ACE, line 117

  1046: type was not found or is not a constant of compilation: Base64Encoder.

  Does this mean that I need Flex to use?

  See you soon

  Shaun

  Sorry about that: http://www.jamesthompsondigital.com/developers/actionscript/classes/hash.php

• Different SHA1 hash value

  Hello
  I tried to use the DBMS_CRYPTO. HASH function for hash SHA1 of channels
  "appleM00003A00000001411111111111111101123100MYR", which suppose to be ' KN4bMOKw5nu29RLZ2xXqDr/H5Lc =',
  but the DBMS_CRYPTO. HASH function return a different value as "28DE1B30E2B0E67BB6F512D9DB15EA0EBFC7E4B7."
  
  
  Here is the code I use to get the SHA1 hash value
  DECLARE
  l_credit_card_no VARCHAR2 (50): = "appleM00003A00000001411111111111111101123100MYR";
  l_ccn_raw RAW (128): = utl_raw.cast_to_raw (l_credit_card_no);
  l_encrypted_raw RAW (2048);
  BEGIN
  dbms_output.put_line ('CC: ' | l_ccn_raw);
  
  
  l_encrypted_raw: = dbms_crypto.hash (l_ccn_raw, 3);
  dbms_output.put_line ('SH1: ' | l_encrypted_raw);
  END;
  
  Anyone know if I am using the correct function?
  
  Thank you
  
  Vincent pek

  There are other included base64 encoding:

  SQL>  declare
   l_credit_card_no varchar2(50) := 'appleM00003A00000001411111111111111101123100MYR';
   l_ccn_raw raw(128) := utl_raw.cast_to_raw(l_credit_card_no);
   l_encrypted_raw raw(2048);
  begin
   dbms_output.put_line('CC: ' || l_ccn_raw);
  
   l_encrypted_raw := dbms_crypto.hash(l_ccn_raw, 3);
   dbms_output.put_line('SH1: ' || (utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(utl_encode.base64_encode(l_encrypted_raw))));
  end;
  /
  CC: 6170706C654D30303030334130303030303030313431313131313131313131313131313130313132333130304D5952
  SH1: KN4bMOKw5nu29RLZ2xXqDr/H5Lc=
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

• Unable to download iOS 9.3.4 via iTunes

  I am new to this forum so Hello to everyone.

  I tried to download the latest version of iOS (9.3.4) for my iPad 2 Air via iTunes without success, every attempt ending with "the software for the iPad has been altered during the download. Where download can be seen in the upper right of iTunes (by clicking on downloads), the icon is replaced by an orange exclamation point. When you click it, the download fails has an error code 1403 - I tried to find what it is, but not luck.

  I downloaded iOS 9.3.4 for my iPhone 64 GB 6s and that worked perfectly. as did download iOS 9.3.4 directly to my iPad i.e. without connecting to iTunes. I want to do a reinstall of my iPad, but iTunes will not allow the download to install it, even if it does not download the entire file.

  I ran a diagnosis in iTunes and there is no problem, I also tried to fix iTunes through programs in the control panel (Windows 10), still no luck. I even turned off my firewall and anti virus and who has not helped either.

  Someone had a similar problem with this previous version or ideas what could be the problem?

  PS, none of my devices are broken, or never been jail.

  Thank you very much

  Mark

  You're not alone, I am also having the same problem.

  I tried another computer, different network. nothing works, so I decided to check the sha1 ipsw

  iPad5, 3_9.3.4_13G35_Restore SHA1: 18861E865AF83AE5C446F30C6898F27A8055C7D0

  the problem is the ipsw is supposed to have SHA1: 75da292347d300277c5945d5974fc18b22d20d75

  It's ridiculous, apple please fix the firmware on your servers.

  .

  To fix your ipad download ios 9.3.3 ipsw then he ever signed.

• Need to access info "header / properties" and the use of a 'peek-a-boo' feature that allows an opening not assigned an e-mail message. BOTH are necessary.

  When the list of "incoming mail is received, a few times an e-mail will have a familiar name, BUT the message is NOT the person I know.» A header would reveal which is the familiar name of MASKING. It is located on the right click of an email entering under "properties.", for those who use the Windows Mail service. Upon activation, two panels are available: "general", line information base; and the jury of "Details". [email protected]

    Here is the "Details" on your recent request:
  

  Return-Path: < 8fd.10.Ragingmt =rochester.rr.com@mxsp4.email-od.com>
  Received: from dnvrco-pub-iedge - vip.email.rr.com ([107.14.70.244])

           by dnvrco-fep24.email.rr.com
           (InterMail vM.8.04.01.13 201-2343-100-167-20131028) with ESMTP
           id <20150527165815.TQBS12014.dnvrco-fep24.email.rr.com@dnvrco-pub-iedge-vip.email.rr.com>
           for <[email protected]>; Wed, 27 May 2015 16:58:15 +0000
  

  Return-Path: < 8fd.10.Ragingmt =rochester.rr.com@mxsp4.email-od.com>
  Received: from [64.151.119.54] (helo [64.151.119.54:45118] =mail24.smtprelayserver.com)
  by dnvrco-iedge04 (envelope-from < 8fd.10.Ragingmt =rochester.rr.com@mxsp4.email-od.com>)
  (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r (Momo - dev:tip)) with ESMTP)
  ID 05/42-22770-6A7F5655; Wednesday May 27, 2015 16:58:15 + 0000
  DKIM signature: v = 1; a = rsa-sha1; d =email - od.com; i=@email-od.com; s = dkim;
  c = relaxed/relaxed; q = txt/dns; t = 1432745904; x = 1435337904;
  h = content-type: mime-version: subject: to: to: date: message-id: reply - to;
  BH = BorokUNlliKkKGt/h0t9J5QZRXM =;
  b = ivSHJkJVgtIuuPbdKelm8wrP9MTDBOfWi38tURaeWYyE7irIYrzg8PjdIXA/r9B3Uc8l1gJJ9blRBU2jcN + jKV4C2 + / 5tSrQSrfiqa9l5xBx81Fm8Winq6uvCxyTCUwioUwJ21eUR7FDAXlDmcg7fbRBoG2b4 + f0CvQLBrdPNxU =
  X-wire-Info: OGZkLjEyLjhhMDAwMDA3NmJmNzIzLlJhZ2luZ210PXJvY2hlc3Rlci5yci5jb20 =
  Received: from r2.us - West - 2A .aws .in .socketlabs .com ([54.186.58.227]) by mail30.email - od.com
  with ESMTP; Wednesday, may 27, 2015 12:58:23-0400
  Received: from support3.webapp.phx1.mozilla.com ([63.245.216.223]), of r2.us - West - 2A .aws .in .socketlabs .com
  with ESMTP; Wednesday, may 27, 2015 12:58:14-0400
  Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

    I do NOT have this option on the right-clicked menu.
  

    Yes, I have been fooled, BUT, with a name of an extended family member, who questions such?  However, the message came from an unknown party, pushing some product from Oprah.   I check now.
  

    There are also e-mails I may NOT wish to indicate that I have "read" them via the formal opening process.  I call this the "peek-a-boo" method of opening an e-mail, as it is NOT a formal opening, per my research.  The point is that NOT all you see on the screen IS what you ARE seeing.  Thus the old saying: "Seeing IS believing.", is NOT true.   This is a more current peeking process, an advancement on the old "300 watt bulb behind the envelope" method of finding out contents withOUT opening the letter.  This applies to a sender I am familiar with BUT, the current topic is NOT of interest to me.   Thus, I can use the "Delete" function with complete satisfaction.
  

    Therefore I wish to know HOW I can gain these two features on THUNDER BIRD e-mails?
  

  Thomas J. Baglin
  [email protected]
  27/05/2015

  R.M. said

  Thank you, you, Matt.
  Regarding the "peek-a-boo," about 15 years ago, it was somewhat revealed the Web that some shippers had the ability to detect IF you had opened their missive.

  This is handled by the Web beacons. Thunderbird blocks remote images by default. Web beacons work only if you enable the remote images in specific email.

  From THIS time, it is the GOVERNMENT that has the ability to detect if you open all or part of your receipts "Entrants".

  Interesting point of view, but not quite corr4ect. f they have access to a mail server IMAP "could" determine the status of mail on this server. In the case of POP e-mail that could determine if it has been downloaded. While I do not trust of Government oversight. About the only time where they would do that would be when they are already studying you as an individual. It's a slow late then.

  So, WHY Windows Mail offers this function and the T-bird, NO mail?

  I played with Visual basic using integrated Internet Explorer about 15 years ago and it was a simple toggle to change the display of the HTML displayed in the source. So I would say it is in windows mail, because he was already in Internet explore and it made for a very simple to implement the functionality. Just expose the existing functionality. After all the composition and rendering in Windows mail used Internet explorer.

  Although the header can help tremendously, , what I SEE is NOT NECESSARILY WHAT THAT REALLY is the content of the e-letter.
  

  This is a feature of Thunderbird. It uses the display names from your address book on incoming mail. You can disable it in the menu (alt + T) tools > options > advanced > reading and posting.

  If the follow-up can be done via the 'Key STROKE' method, and YOU do NOT know of it, then a "peek-a-boo" is useful to have, huh?

  Keyloggers are all also able to capture screens and clicks. If your number more ahead.

  It makes me feel, I have a FEW C-O-N-T-R-O-L that I CHOSE to read, and what I based on the content and subject.

  Seriously. encryption of e-mails with s/mime and free email certificates will do more to protect your mail that any kind of fake check before you read. Most of the people may face apparently not having a certificate of personal mail to encrypt their mail and like most internet technologies, we get the lowest common denominator. This is the plain text that scours the internet to an ordinary human-readable text.

  Please when using these forums not your text indent. This is what makes it become very difficult to read and not wrap. I don't know that that is how you were taught in school. I learned the same thing. But it must comply with the requirements of the opportunity.

• The exclamation icon instead of padlock

  When I type www.amazon.com and then log on to my firefox 37.01 (SHA1 13fbc8686b0bc443f77297743443958e3d471d73) the following text is displayed in the URL field with an exclamation icon before the URL.

  https://support.CDN.Mozilla.NET/media/uploads/images/2015-05-24-12-21-56-d1fc8e.PNG

  If I open the same web site on the same workstation using another browser, it works showing the correct https. Also, if I copy the URL in Firefox it works showing the value of the correct URL.

  Firefox seems to change the URL as shown

  Wrong URL:
  https://www.Amazon.com/AP/signin?_encoding=UTF8 & openid.assoc_handle = usflex & openid.claimed_id=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.identity=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.mode = checkid_setup & openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0 & openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0 & openid.pape.max_auth_age = 0 & openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2F www.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fyourstore%2Fhome%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dnav_ya_signin

  good URL:
  https://www.Amazon.com/AP/signin/189-4554439-6554623?_encoding=UTF8 & openid.assoc_handle = usflex & openid.claimed_id=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.identity=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.mode = checkid_setup & openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0 & openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0 & openid.pape.max_auth_age = 0 & openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2F www.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fyourstore%2Fhome%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dnav_ya_signin

  This means that Firefox is distort the URL address, why?

  Hello!

  Both the URL "(s) you have provided have the padlock solid for me."

  Also, I see that your version of Firefox is a bit outdated. Please consider to update first to see if that solves your problem.

  Bad URL: https://www.amazon.com/ap/signin?_encoding=UTF8 & openid.assoc_handle = usflex & openid.claimed_id=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.identity=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.mode = checkid_setup & openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0 & openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0 & openid.pape.max_auth_age = 0 & openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2F www.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fyourstore%2Fhome%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dnav_ya_signin

  good URL: https://www.amazon.com/ap/signin/189-4554439-6554623?_encoding=UTF8 & openid.assoc_handle = usflex & openid.claimed_id=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.identity=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0%2Fidentifier_select & openid.mode = checkid_setup & openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0 & openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0 & openid.pape.max_auth_age = 0 & openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2F www.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fyourstore%2Fhome%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dnav _

  I tested both of these URL'(s) with the padlock being shown so no problems are on my side. However, the reason behind this is interesting as to why you are facing this problem. However, you have indicated that on a separate workstation you might not this problem. I would consider a new installation of Firefox and a virus scan just to be on the safe side. Or if you want to provide more information or newspapers on this, that would be helpful, but I leave the choice to you. Personally, a new reinstall of Firefox does not hurt

  Some Firefox problems can be solved by performing a clean reinstall. This means that you remove Firefox program files, and then reinstall Firefox. Please follow these steps:

  Note: You can print these steps or consult them in another browser.

  1. Download the latest version of Firefox from mozilla.org office (or choose the download for your operating system and language on this page) and save the file to install it on your computer.
  2. Once the download is complete, close all Firefox Windows (or open the Firefox menu

     

     Click the close button

     

  ).

• Remove the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
  • Windows:
    • C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
    • C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox
  • Mac: Delete Firefox in the Applications folder.
  • Linux: If you have installed Firefox with the distribution-based package manager, you must use the same way to uninstall: see Install Firefox on Linux. If you have downloaded and installed the binary package from the Firefox download page, simply remove the folder firefox in your home directory.
• Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
  1. Double-click on the downloaded Setup file and go through the steps in the installation wizard.
  2. Once the wizard is completed, click to open Firefox directly after clicking the Finish button.

More information on the resettlement of Firefox can be found here.

WARNING: Do not use an uninstaller to third parties as part of this process. This could permanently delete your Firefox profile data, including but not limited to, extensions, cache, cookies, bookmarks, personal settings and passwords saved. They can be retrieved easily unless they have been backed up on an external device! See back up and restore the information contained in the profiles of Firefox.

Please report to say if this helped you!

Thank you.